CHAPTER VII.

INDUSTRY: WEAVERS, GLOVERS, SOCK-MAKERS, CORDWAINERS, TANNERS, HATTERS,

DYERS OF PURPLE, ETC., FISHERMEN.

In spinning and weaving the ancients evidently rivalled us, though

without the aid of machinery. As far, indeed, as the former process is

concerned, no machinery can rival the human hand, which, from its slight

oily exudation[1283] is enabled to communicate superior strength and

evenness to the finest threads. Thus in Hindustân muslins were formerly

produced, which, laid on the grass and wetted by dew, became

invisible.[1284] And there is no reason for doubting that the produce of

ancient Greek looms rivalled those of Dakka. The fabrics of Cos[1285]

and Tarentum appear, in fact, from the testimony of the ancients, to

have floated like a snowy mist around the female form, disclosing its

whole contour like a gauze veil.[1286] In flowered and variegated

tissues,[1287] too, they attained extraordinary excellence. The finest

and most brilliant shot stuffs imitating the breast of the dove,

flowered cloth of gold, and the weaving of gold wire itself, were known

to the ancients. Silk, before that of China[1288] was common in the

west, they obtained from the beard of a sea shell; and lawn and cambric

and open work, like Brussels or Valenciennes lace, were familiar to

them.

-----

Footnote 1283:

The whole of the manufacture in India is by hand-spinning,

consequently there is a greater tension, from the moisture which the

hand gives them, than can be had from anything in the shape of

machinery; a fine yarn can be produced by hand-spinning “from a short

staple, which frame-spinning will not touch at all.” Report from the

Lords, July 8, 1830, p. 316.

Footnote 1284:

Tavernier relates, “that the ambassador of Shah Sefi, on his return

from India, presented his master with a cocoa-nut, set with jewels,

containing a muslin turban, sixty covits, or thirty English yards, in

length, so exquisitely fine, that it could scarcely be felt by the

touch.” The Hindoos, vol. i. p. 188.

Footnote 1285:

Winkel. Hist. de l’Art. i. 498.

Footnote 1286:

Athen. xii. 23. Aristoph. Lysist. 48. Poll. vii. 76.

Footnote 1287:

To these an allusion is made in the following passage of Plato: ὥσπερ

ἱμάτιον ποικίλον πᾶσιν ἄνθεσι πεποικιλμένον, οὕτω καὶ αὔτη πᾶσιν ἤθεσι

πεποικιλμένη καλλίστη ἂν φαίνοιτο. De Repub. viii. t. vi. p. 401. Cf.

Poll. iii. 34. Winkelmann, i. 500. Athen. ii. 30.

Footnote 1288:

Paus. vi. 266, sqq. Aristoph. Hist. Animal. v. 19, p. 138. Plin. Nat.

Hist. ix. 26, seq. Gibbon, t. vii. p. 90, seq. Dapper, p. 266.

-----

Being ignorant of who was the inventor of the art of weaving, they

attributed the honour to Athena, who imparted a knowledge of it to

Arachnè,[1289] a virgin of Mæonia, afterwards changed into a spider. But

spiders were not long the only weavers among the Hellenes, who speedily

invented the upright and horizontal looms, which, in after times at

least, were constructed from the wood of the andrachnè.[1290]

-----

Footnote 1289:

Goguet, i. 266. Plut. Nic. § 9.

Footnote 1290:

Theoph. Hist. Plant. v. 7. 7. The stem of the bastard-saffron (κνῆκος)

was used as a spindle by the women of remote antiquity. vi. 14. 3.

-----

Among the finest and most elegant fabrics of Greece were those

manufactured in the Achæan city of Patræ,[1291] where the women being

twice as numerous as the men, would alone appear to have worked in the

factories, from which the greater number of the inhabitants, doubtless,

derived their livelihood. The flax, from which the fine linen and

head-nets[1292] of this town were made, was not grown in the

neighbourhood, but in the plains of Elis,[1293] where alone, in Greece,

the plant attained the highest degree of perfection, not yielding in

fineness to the best produced in India, while it was possessed of

superior whiteness.[1294] The fine cloths manufactured from it sold for

their weight in gold.[1295] Another species of very fine flax was

cultivated in the island of Amorgos,[1296] where were likewise

manufactured linens of the most beautiful texture, frequently dyed

purple, on which account the word Amorgis[1297] has sometimes been

supposed to denote a purple stuff, though the fabrics of the island were

as often white as of any other colour. In imitation of the Egyptians,

they wove a sort of fine napkins, which were evidently used in the same

manner as our pocket-handkerchiefs.[1298]

-----

Footnote 1291:

Pausan. vii. 21. 14. Cf. Dutens, Origine des Découvertes, p. 285.

Herod. ii. 105.

Footnote 1292:

Foës. Œconom. Hippoc. v. κεκρύφαλος. p. 202. These head-nets were

purple among the Spartans. Athen. xv. 28. The Grecian ladies, it would

appear, sometimes wore upon their heads cauls of fine skin, probably

semi-transparent, which obtained the name of πομφόλυγες. Mœris, p.

206. Bekk. In a former part of this work, I have supposed this word,

where it occurs in Pollux, to signify beads, because water-bubbles,

which transparent beads resemble, were so called. Etym. Mag. 682. 10.

Suid. v. πομφόλ. t. ii. p. 565. d. Martial alludes to the cauls

above-mentioned in the following verses:

Fortior et tortos servat vesica capillos,

Et mutat Latias spumâ Batavâ comas.

Epigram. viii. 23. 19.

Footnote 1293:

Not as Mr. Bœckh supposes in Achaia, this name signifying Greece in

general. It grew, observes Pliny, _circa Elim in Achaia_. Nat. Hist.

xix. 4. Bœckh. i. 142.

Footnote 1294:

Paus. vi. 26. 6. v. 5. 2. vii. 21. 14. Winkel. Hist. de l’Art, i. 498.

Sixteen matrons wove the peplos of Hera in Elis. Meurs. Gr. Fer. iii.

130, sqq.

Footnote 1295:

Quaternis denariis scripula ejus permutata quondam, ut auri reperio.

Plin. Nat. Hist. xix. 4.

Footnote 1296:

Suid. v. Ἀμοργὶς. Aristoph. Lysist. 150, et Schol. This was the rate

at which silk was afterwards sold, as we learn from an anecdote of

Aurelian. “Vestem holosericam neque ipse in vestiario suo habuit,

neque alteri utendam dedit. Et quum ab eo uxor sua peteret, ut unico

pallio blatteo serico uteretur, ille respondit, _absit ut auro fila

pensentur_: libra enim auri tunc libra serici fuit.” Vopisc. Vit.

Aurelian, cap. xlv.

Footnote 1297:

See Dapper, Description des Iles de l’Archipel. p. 184.

Footnote 1298:

For which the old man substitutes a fox’s tail. Aristoph. Eq. 906, et

Schol.

-----

Even from hemp, very superior cloths were produced[1299] in antiquity,

especially amongst the Thracians, in whose country this plant was found

both in a cultivated and a wild state. It differed very little from

flax, except in its superior height and thickness; and the fabrics

manufactured from it were not to be distinguished from linen, save by

the most experienced judges. From hair, too, they both wove and plaited

a variety of garments, among which would seem to have been a sort of

mantle for ladies.[1300] Sacks, too, were manufactured from the same

materials, together with socks, whips, and fishing-lines. The Egyptians,

we may observe by the way, wove fine cloths and sails, and made ropes,

from the fibre of the papyrus plant,[1301] as the Indians did from a

sort of grass or fine rush.[1302]

-----

Footnote 1299:

Poll. vii. 73. Herod. iv. 74.

Footnote 1300:

Hemst. ad Poll. x. 32. Cf. ii. 24.

Footnote 1301:

Herod. vii. 12.

Footnote 1302:

Id. iii. 98. Comm. on Poll. vii. 76.

-----

In the island of Cos existed, from a very early age, the art of rearing

silkworms and weaving silk. As these insects, however, fed on the leaves

of the pine, the ash, and the oak, the white mulberry not having been

yet introduced into Greece, the silk they produced was very different in

quality from that of China. The art of unwinding the cocoons and

spinning the threads was invented by Pamphila, daughter of Plates,[1303]

who thus became the benefactress of her country, whose fabrics were

universally admired for their delicacy, fineness, and transparency,

since they allowed the whole form and colour of the body to be

distinguished through them, like the gauze chemises worn by the Turkish

ladies in the recesses of the harem.[1304] Another kind of silk was

manufactured by the ancients from the floss-like beard of the pinna

marina, or silk-worm of the sea,[1305] found on the coasts of Asia

Minor, Sicily, and the Balearic isles. This kind of silk was evidently,

at one period, held in the highest estimation, since we find the

emperors of Rome bestowing robes of it as a mark of their imperial

favour on the satraps of Armenia. In modern times, however, this branch

of industry has been almost totally neglected, though very warm and

beautiful winter gloves and stockings are still manufactured from it at

Tarento. A pair of these gloves was considered of sufficient importance

to be presented as a gift to Pope Benedict the Fourteenth.[1306]

-----

Footnote 1303:

Aristot. Hist. Animal. v. 19. Plin. Nat. Hist. ix. 26.

Footnote 1304:

Lady Montague’s Works, t. ii. p. 191.

Footnote 1305:

Shaw, Travels in Barbary. Winkelmann, i. 499.

Footnote 1306:

Winkelmann, Hist. de l’Art. i. 499. Æschyl. Agamem. 855.

-----

But not for lightness and fineness only were the silks and other

delicate fabrics of the ancients valued. They were variegated[1307] with

stripes, lozenges, the figures of birds and other animals, sprigs,

flowers,[1308] and stars,[1309] inwoven into their texture, and of the

most brilliant and beautiful colours.

-----

Footnote 1307:

Plut. Aristid. § 16. Winkelmann, Hist. de l’Art, i. 492. Herod. vii.

67.

Footnote 1308:

Plat. de Repub. t. vi. p. 401.

Footnote 1309:

Athen. xiii. 45. xii. 50. Cf. Winkelmann, i. 499. Gitone, Il Costume

Antico e Moderno di tutti i Popoli, t. i. p. 94. Tav. 15.

-----

Occasionally, moreover, when the ground of the whole tissue was white, a

border of fanciful scrolls, leaves, and flowers, intermingling their

several tints, extended round the whole robe or mantle, which was

sometimes also bedropped with asterisks of gold. Their flowered silks,

and cloths of various colours, were worn, not only by ladies in their

dresses, but occasionally, also, by vain young men, who thus exposed

themselves to the derision of the multitude. Bed-curtains, too, and the

hangings of apartments[1310] were of variegated stuffs. In the

manufacturing of tapestry[1311] and drapery for the statues and temples

of the gods, the greatest possible magnificence and beauty were

displayed. Whole years were devoted to the production of a single piece,

which exhibited views of landscapes and cities, together with figures of

gods, and heroes, and groups of warriors, sometimes arranged in

religious processions, at other times engaged in battle, where the

scene, the combatants, their armour, their weapons, and the flowing gore

were represented by various colours to the life.[1312] In the

manufacture of carpets, the Greeks displayed great taste and elegance,

whether we regard the figures of animals, trees, or flowers, with which

they were inwrought, or their pile, softness, and texture.[1313] Many

times when they had not been flowered by the hand of the weaver, they

were adorned by the ladies themselves with sprigs, and leaves, and

figures, in embroidery; sometimes of various bright colours, at others

with threads of gold.[1314] Even napkins in Egypt were embroidered with

golden flowers,[1315] as both these and all kinds of handkerchiefs still

are throughout the East. In Greece, the fine soft vests which

warriors[1316] wore beneath their shirts of mail were usually figured

with rich embroidery by the females of their family.

-----

Footnote 1310:

Casaub. ad Theoph. Char. p. 172. Athen. xv. 42.

Footnote 1311:

Hom. Il. γ. 125, sqq.

Footnote 1312:

Cf. Hom. Il. ζ. 289. 295.

Footnote 1313:

See Book III. chap. ii.

Footnote 1314:

One of the most extraordinary productions of the Grecian loom seems to

have been that magnificent chlamys which was weaving for king

Demetrius at the period of his overthrow. It had been, we are told, a

long time in hand, and represented in one vast picture both the face

of the earth, and heaven with all its constellations. But it was never

completed, none of the succeeding sovereigns of Macedon possessing the

gorgeous taste of the son of Antigonos. Plut. Demet. § 41. Next

perhaps to this in curious workmanship may be reckoned that rich

mantle fifteen cubits in length, which the Sybarite Alcisthenes

exhibited on Mount Lacinium during the festival of Hera, which was

frequented by all the people of Italy. Dionysios, the elder, obtaining

possession of this garment, sold it to the Carthaginians for a hundred

and twenty talents. It was of a rich sea purple colour, and surrounded

on all sides by a border containing the figures of animals, the upper

row consisting of those of Susiana, the lower of those of Persia

Proper. In the middle appeared an assembly of the gods—Zeus, Hera,

Themis, Athena, Apollo, and Aphroditè. At either end stood a figure of

Alcisthenes himself with a representation, probably symbolical of the

city of Sybaris. All these figures were the produce of the loom, and

not of the needle. Aristot. de Mirab. Auscult. t. xvi. p. 199, seq.

Athen. xii. 58.

Footnote 1315:

Poll. iv. 116. Athen. ix. 79. v. 28. Herod. ii. 122. Lucian. Amor. §

36, sqq.

Footnote 1316:

Cf. Herod. vii. 61. ix. 76. 109.

-----

It appears to be generally supposed,[1317] that silver threads were not

employed until a very recent period, either in weaving or

embroidery;[1318] we find mention, however, in Philo Judæus,[1319] of

purple coverlets inwrought with silver and gold. But at length the love

of show and magnificence rose to so high a pitch, that robes were woven

entirely of threads of gold.[1320] Ribbons also were manufactured of the

same materials, and several fragments of these fabrics have more than

once been discovered in cinerary urns at Rome, though the greediness of

the finder has almost invariably led to their being melted down.[1321]

At a later period stuffs were woven partly of silk or woollen and partly

of gold.[1322]

-----

Footnote 1317:

By Beckmann, for example, History of Inventions, ii. 217, and

Salmasius, ad Vopisc. p. 394, and ad Tertull. de Pallio, p. 208.

Footnote 1318:

Cf. Lucian. Amor. § 38, sqq.

Footnote 1319:

Ed. Mangey, ii. 478.

Footnote 1320:

Winkelmann, i. 503. Huet, Hist. of Comm. p. 33. Cf. Athen. xii. 5,

sqq.

Footnote 1321:

Winkel. Hist. de l’Art, i. 503.

Footnote 1322:

Id. i. 504.

-----

Of gloves[1323] the Greeks made little use, though they must have

observed very early, that they were worn by the Persians, and probably

by other nations of Asia.[1324] Nay even among their own rustics they

would appear to have been in fashion as far back as the heroic

ages.[1325] The principal customers, therefore, of the Hellenic glovers

were the hedgers and ditchers, woodmen, and actors; for on the stage it

was frequently necessary to appear in gloves,[1326] either in order to

disguise the colour or augment the size of the hands, or, as in the case

of the Furies, to give them the appearance of being furnished with

talons like those of the hippogriff.[1327]

-----

Footnote 1323:

Cf. Poll. ii. 152.

Footnote 1324:

Xenoph. Cyrop. viii. 8.

Footnote 1325:

Odyss. ω. 229. Paccichelli, de Chirothecis, in p. 238.

Footnote 1326:

Luc. Jup. Tragœd. § 41.

Footnote 1327:

See an example, Mus. Chiaramont, tav. 16. Museo Real Borbonico, tav.

32. 50.

-----

Stockings properly so called, were perhaps little known to the Greeks,

though we find mention made of certain socks woven from the cotonaceous

filaments of a species of river truffle,[1328] which must have resembled

them very closely both in form and texture. Besides, we see in works of

art representations of this kind of sock reaching nearly to the knees,

and somewhat loose, which may probably therefore have been woven. But

the common sock, like the hat, was of felt,[1329] and usually

white,[1330] fitting close to the foot and leg, and chiefly worn by

women, with shoes or sandals,[1331] and sometimes in lieu of them,[1332]

though in some cases it occupied the same place in the costume of the

Greeks as it does in modern times.

-----

Footnote 1328:

Theoph. Hist. Plant. viii. 13. 8.

Footnote 1329:

Theoph. Hist. Plant. vii. 13. Athen. ii. 67. Plin. Nat. Hist. xix. 10.

Poll. i. 148. ii. 196. Some persons wore in winter a lambskin covering

for the legs and feet. Sch. Aristoph. Nub. 720.

Footnote 1330:

Lucian. Rhet. Præcept. § 15.

Footnote 1331:

Schol. Aristoph. Lysist. 417. Acharn. 299.

Footnote 1332:

Constant, v. πῖλοι. Antich. di Ercol. t. ii. p. 185.

-----

The Hellenic cordwainers[1333] appear in every age to have carried on

a thriving trade, since all the world, with the exception of a few

philosophers, went well shod. Their workshops seem to have been neatly

furnished. The shoes already made, whether plain or gilded,[1334] used

to be ranged on shelves fixed up against the wall with fanciful

brackets, while their lasts, pastepots, pincers, awls,[1335] and other

implements, were kept in armories, sometimes furnished with double

folding-doors, four or five deep shelves, and extremely elegant in

form. Their cutting-boards[1336] were made from the wood of the wild

pear-tree which being of a close hard grain kept their knives

constantly in edge. Among the Israelites we find mention made of shoes

of badger-skins.[1337]

-----

Footnote 1333:

Poll. vii. 80-96. Schol. Aristoph. Acharn. 299. Eq. 321. 709. Vesp.

103. Athen. iii. 56. On the Cretan Cothurn. Poll. vii. 193. v. 18.

Bœttig. Les Furies, p. 35. There was an expensive sort of Ionian shoe

called βαυκίδες. Etym. Mag. 192. 17. Κρηπίδες. Hieron. Mag. Miscell.

iii. 3. A pair of these slippers appears to have been a day’s work,

and cost in Lucian’s time seven oboloi. Somn. seu Gal. § 22. Herodotus

speaks of purple buskins, vii. 76. The women of Thessaly wore wooden

shoes. Athen. xiii. 55.

Footnote 1334:

Luc. adv. Indoct. § 6.

Footnote 1335:

Poll. ii. 195. x. 141. Antich. di Ercol. t. i. tav. 35. p. 187.

Footnote 1336:

Theoph. Hist. Plant. v. 5. 1.

Footnote 1337:

Ezekiel, xvi. 10.

-----

Of the various processes resorted to for tanning, dressing, and dyeing

leather,[1338] whether to be worked up into clothing, armour, shoes, or

parchment, too little by far is known. We are merely informed that, in

removing the hair from hides and skins, they made use of the berries of

the white briony;[1339] that, in preparing them for receiving any dye or

colour, the seeds of the sumach[1340] were employed; and that the bark

of the fir-tree and the wood of the alder,[1341] reduced to chips,

entered into various preparations for dressing and dyeing.[1342]

Fawn-skins among the Thracians were prepared probably with the hair

on,[1343] for a sort of buskins,[1344] and the skins of sheep,[1345] and

dogs,[1346] beavers,[1347] otters, and badgers, tanned in a variety of

ways, sometimes with and sometimes without the hair, were appropriated

to the manufacture of various articles of dress. Leather, moreover, was

dyed of every bright colour,[1348] purple, scarlet, and crimson, and

occasionally gilded or flowered with gold,[1349] for sandals, thongs,

and other purposes.

-----

Footnote 1338:

Schol. Aristoph. Av. 259.

Footnote 1339:

Dioscor. iv. 184.

Footnote 1340:

Ῥόος. Dioscor. i. 147.

Footnote 1341:

Theoph. Hist. Plant, iii. 9. 1. 14. 3.

Footnote 1342:

The low oak, which produces the large acorn used in tanning, is now

found in abundance in the Troad. Chandler i. 25.

Footnote 1343:

Herod. vii. 75.

Footnote 1344:

Sandals of leather with the hair on are still occasionally observed

among the sailors of Greece. Chandler. ii. p. 12.

Footnote 1345:

Schol. Aristoph. Eq. 398.

Footnote 1346:

Schol. Aristoph. Nub. 269.

Footnote 1347:

Dioscor. ii. 26.

Footnote 1348:

As early as the age of Moses we find mention of rams’-skins dyed red.

Exod. xxv. 5.

Footnote 1349:

Poll. vii. 87.

-----

The manufacture of hats and caps,[1350] though a less important branch

of industry than among the northern nations of modern times, afforded

nevertheless employment to a pretty numerous class of persons. At Athens

it was not fashionable in fine weather to wear a hat at all, chiefly,

perhaps, because the practice was supposed to hasten the approach of

grey hairs;[1351] but in those seasons of the year when sudden showers

were looked for, cautious persons seldom went abroad without their

broad-brim, which being furnished with a long skin thong was suffered to

fall back and hang over the shoulders. If they happened to be caught by

the rain when not thus provided, they threw, like Strepsiades in the

Clouds, a corner of their mantle over the head. These hats were of

various shapes,[1352] and manufactured of very different materials;

sometimes square or lozenge-formed, like our college-caps: sometimes

round with broad leaf[1353] and low basinet crown; sometimes peaked atop

with rim curling all round like the bell of the Egyptian lotos. There

was another modification of the hat,[1354] fashioned like a

limpet-shell, and without a brim, chiefly worn by fishermen and poor

operatives, and sometimes also by travellers.[1355]

-----

Footnote 1350:

Poll. vii. 171. The President Goguet, however, imagines the Greeks had

no hats. v. 440. Nightcaps. Sch. Vesp. 10. Arist. Cf. Antich. di

Ercol. t. viii. p. 47. Gitone, Il Cost. Ant. e Mod. di tut. i Pop. t.

i. p. 102. pl. 16.

Footnote 1351:

Aristot. de Gen. Animal. v. 1. p. 355.

Footnote 1352:

Dion Chrysost. ii. 67.

Footnote 1353:

Poll. x. 164. Athen. i. 12.

Footnote 1354:

Poll. vii. 124. x. 127, 138. Solerius, de Pileo. c. viii. p. 167.

Footnote 1355:

Solerius, de Pileo. c. viii. p. 167.

-----

The cynic, Menippos, however, when making his round through Thebes, in

the costume of a Fury, wore a broad-brimmed Arcadian hat, on which were

represented the twelve signs of the zodiac.[1356] Among the Macedonians,

who in all things affected magnificence, the hats of the courtiers and

nobles were purple,[1357] like the tiara of the Persians,[1358] which,

however, was furnished with side-flaps, resembling a peacock’s wings.

The most common material was felt, though they were likewise made of

leather. Caps were ordinarily manufactured of dog, or sheep, or lamb

skin.[1359]

-----

Footnote 1356:

Bœttiger. Furies, p. 29, sqq.

Footnote 1357:

Plut. Eumenes. § 8.

Footnote 1358:

Sch. Aristoph. Acharn. 63. Cf. Poll. iv. 154.

Footnote 1359:

Schol. Aristoph. Nub. 269. Poll. iv. 139.

-----

But if in some of these branches of the useful arts the Greeks

approached, and, perhaps, equalled, the moderns, in another they

probably excelled them; I mean in dyeing,[1360] more particularly, that

deep crimson, or purple, of which Greek and Roman authors so often speak

with an admiration bordering on rapture. Winkelmann[1361] is not far

wrong in supposing there were two kinds of purple, the one containing a

tinge of violet, or sea-blue, produced at Tarentum,[1362] the other

resembling our lake, known in antiquity as Tyrian dye. On the origin of

this colour the ancients had many legends (for they loved to build a

mythos on what they could not explain), from among which we shall select

the most poetical. The Tyrian Heracles loved, they say, a nymph, who

dwelt somewhere about the sea-coast, and her name, it is added, was

Tyros. In visiting this young lady, Heracles, according to the custom of

the heroic age, was accompanied by his dog, as we find Telemachos, in

the Odyssey. This same dog, not having love to support him, grew hungry

by the way, and espying a purple fish upon a rock, with its head

protruding from the shell, he seized, and devoured it. On Heracles

reaching the residence of the nymph, she observed the muzzle of the

animal dyed of a bright purple, and, in the style of a froward beauty,

declared she would never again see her lover until he brought her a

dress of that colour. Now this hero, as all the world knows, or may

learn from the comic poets, was always more remarkable for courage and

gluttony than for invention. Love, however, on the present occasion,

sharpened his wits. He discovered the fish, turned dyer, and, having

produced such an article as the lady required, had the honour of being

esteemed the inventor of the Tyrian purple.[1363]

-----

Footnote 1360:

Cf. Plat. Tim. t. vii. 95. De Rep. t. vi. p. 183, seq. Don J. P.

Canáls y Martí, sob. la Purp. de los Antiguos. Gibbon, however,

considered the ancient purple very inferior to our own: “By the

discovery of cochineal, &c., we far surpass the colours of antiquity.

Their royal purple had a strong smell, and a dark cast, as deep as

bull’s blood—obscuritas rubens (says Cassiodorus, Var. i. 2,) nigredo

sanguinea. The president, Goguet, will _amuse_ and _satisfy_ the

reader.” Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, vii. 90. _Note._ Goguet

will, no doubt, amuse and instruct, but I very much question whether

he will satisfy, the reader. When Goguet and Gibbon wrote, the subject

was much less understood than it is at present.

Footnote 1361:

Hist. de l’Art. iv. 5. 500, sqq.

Footnote 1362:

Horat. Epist. ii. 1. 207.

Footnote 1363:

Poll. i. 45. sqq. Palæphat. Fragm. ap. Gal. Opuscul. Mytholog. &c. p.

62. Goguet, Origine des Loix. iii. 196. Fab. Column. de Purp. i. 22.

-----

The writer to whom we are indebted for this fable, which he related for

the amusement of Commodus, has preserved a valuable account of the

purple fishery as carried on by the Phœnicians. They fastened, he

observes,[1364] a number of small bell-formed baskets, at regular

distances, to a long, stout, and tough cable, capable of resisting the

action of the sea. These baskets, like the eel-traps of modern times,

were surrounded at the mouth with a circle of slender twigs[1365]

projecting inward, and almost meeting at the centre, resembling the

bottom of a claret bottle, but with an opening through which the fish

could easily force its way in, though the twigs closing with a spring

behind it prevented its egress. To entice the prey, there was a bait in

the basket, which, according to some, was a cockle, according to others,

a frog, upon a hook,[1366] so that assurance was made doubly sure. All

things thus prepared, the fisherman conveyed the apparatus to a rocky

part of the shore, where they let it down, having previously fastened to

it a strong cord with a piece of cork at the end, that they might be

able to discover and pull it up. Leaving their traps there all night and

all the ensuing day, they generally took up the basket full. Then,

pounding both shell and flesh together, to prepare it for dyeing they

cleansed away all impurities with water, and boiled the whole in a

cauldron. The blood, being of an oily nature, melted on coming in

contact with the heat and acquired its rich colour. Not always did it

assume the same tint, but was sometimes yellow, sometimes a deep violet,

and, occasionally, some other shade. Into this whatever was dipped

immediately took the tincture of it. Nor did it all fade in the sun;

but, on the contrary, rejoiced in the rays of light, as it were, its

brightness imparting additional brilliance, and heightening the bloom

and splendour of its tints.[1367]

-----

Footnote 1364:

Cf. Pausan. x. 37. 3.

Footnote 1365:

Cf. Poll. i. 97. Plat. Sophist. t. iv. p. 134. Æl. Var. Hist. xiii.

43.

Footnote 1366:

Athen. iii. 33.

Footnote 1367:

Poll. i. 47, sqq.

-----

Wherever, and by whomsoever, discovered, the purple was known in the

time of Moses, who introduced it into the costume of the high priest,

and among the ornaments of the tabernacle.[1368] Homer,[1369] too,

speaks of purple among the colours worn by his heroes, for example, a

large purple pelisse. Iris is denominated “purple;” we have mention,

also, of a “purple cloak, of a purple ball wherewith to play;” “purple

coverings,” of great beauty, for beds, or seats; “purple carpets;”

“purple threads,” where the “sea-purple” is distinctly spoken of.[1370]

Again, in another part of the Odyssey, we find it said, that women wove

the “purple cloaks.”[1371] The President Goguet has entered into many

useful investigations respecting the manner in which the Tyrian dye was

used; but at the outset confounds the _conchyliatæ vestes_ with the

purple garments, though Pliny, on whom he chiefly relies, constantly

distinguishes them. The dye was obtained from several kinds of

shell-fish[1372] found in the Mediterranean, the best on the island on

which New Tyre was built.[1373] Aristotle, who of all the ancients has

best described the purple fish, observes, that there were several

species, of which some were of considerable size, such as those caught

near Sigeion and Lecton; while those found on the coast of Caria and in

the Euripos were small. Generally, he says, such as inhabited bays or

arms of the sea were large and rough, and contained a liquid of blackish

hue, though sometimes it was reddish, and small in quantity. Some of

these were a mina, or about seventeen ounces, in weight. Those caught

close along shores, or about headlands were usually of small size, but

the dye they yielded was of a ruddier tinge. In general, too, it was

thought that those found on northern coasts produced a darker, those on

southern coasts a ruddier dye.[1374] Purple fisheries were carried on on

the coast of Africa, near the island of Menninx, and on the shores of

Getulia.[1375] So, likewise, in Europe,[1376] on the coast of

Laconia,[1377] whose purple was greatly celebrated; in the Euripos, as

we have seen above;[1378] and in the terrible southern bend of Eubœa,

beneath the cliffs of Mount Caphareus.[1379] An inferior kind of purple

was obtained from the buccinum,[1380] but the genuine dye was produced

by the _calchè_ alone. The colour was contained in a white vein about

the neck, the remainder of the fish being of no value. To secure, this,

however, it was necessary to take the fish alive, for at its death the

colour fled. Having been carefully collected, and left to macerate in

salt[1381] during three days, it was mixed with a certain quantity of

water. The whole was then boiled for ten days in leaden boilers over a

slow fire.[1382] After this the wool well washed, cleansed and properly

prepared, was dipped into it. Here it was allowed to soak during five

hours. It was then taken out, dried, carded, and thrown back, where it

was suffered to remain till it imbibed the whole of the dye.[1383] To

this double-dyed purple the poets often allude. Thus Horace:

Te bis Afro

Murice tinctæ

Vestiunt Lanæ.[1384]

-----

Footnote 1368:

Exod. xxv. 4, sqq.

Footnote 1369:

Il. ζ. 219. θ. 221. ρ. 547. Odyss. δ. 115. 154. τ. 225. 242. θ. 373.

δ. 298. ι. ω. 645. 796. ι. 200. Odyss. υ. 151. Cf. Pind. Pyth. iv.

203. 6.

Footnote 1370:

Odyss. ξ. 53. 306.

Footnote 1371:

Id. ν. 108.

Footnote 1372:

See a representation of the purple fish on a red jasper in Gori, Mus.

Florent. ii. pl. 21. fig. 4.

Footnote 1373:

Plin. Nat. Hist. ix. 60.

Footnote 1374:

Arist. Hist. Anim. v. 15. p. 128, seq. Vitruv. vii. 13.

Footnote 1375:

Plin. Nat. Hist. ix. 60.

Footnote 1376:

There was another purple fishery of considerable note carried on in

the Corinthian gulf by the citizens of Bulis, a city of Phocis.

Pausan. x. 37. 2. 3. Steph. de Urbib. p. 238. On the modern state of

Bulis see Chandler, ii. p. 288.

Footnote 1377:

Pausan. iii. 21. 6.

Footnote 1378:

Pausan. iii. 21. 6.

Footnote 1379:

Dion Chrysost. Orat. vii.

Footnote 1380:

This fish is now abundant on the shores of Naples, where it is

commonly eaten. Fab. Column. de Purp. iv. 1.

Footnote 1381:

The proportion of salt was 20 oz. to 1 cwt. of the purple matter.

Plin. Nat. Hist. ix. 62.

Footnote 1382:

The animal matter mingled with it being constantly skimmed off. Plin.

Nat. Hist. ix. 62.

Footnote 1383:

Plin. ix. 62. Gog. iii. 20.

Footnote 1384:

Carm. ii. 16. 35, sqq. On this the ancient scholiast quoted by

Bentley, says, “Bis tinctæ, dibaphæ vestes preciocissimæ.” Cf. Pompon.

Mel. iii. 10. 35, p. 301. Gronov.

-----

And again where the Phœnician operation is spoken of:

Muricibus Tyriis iteratæ vellera lanæ

Cui properabantur?[1385]

-----

Footnote 1385:

Epod. xii. 21, seq.

-----

Elsewhere in enumerating the things, wherein the vulgar pride

themselves, he once more enumerates purple garments—

Gemmas, marmor, ebur, Tyrrhena sigilla, tabellas,

Argentum, vestes Gætulo murice tinctas,

Sunt qui non habeant, est qui non curat habere.[1386]

-----

Footnote 1386:

Epist. ii. 2. 180, seq.

-----

It was seldom or never considered sufficient to rely upon one species of

fish. Usually several kinds were mingled together;[1387] and to the

mixture were added many other ingredients, as nitre, urine, water, salt,

and the fucus—a kind of moss—by some writers supposed to be our

argol,[1388] found in abundance on the rocky shores of Crete.[1389] The

tint produced by this mixture resembled the colour of the

amethyst.[1390] For, under the word purple, the ancients included three

distinct colours,—the first a deep violet with a black or dusky tinge,

designed by Homer, when he speaks of the “purple wave,” or of “purple

death.” This was the amethystine shade spoken of as so magnificent by

Pliny; produced by the calchæ and buccina alone. The second which

resembled deep scarlet or crimson, which is the colour of a ripe

pomegranate, was the purple of Tyre and Tarentum. The third was the deep

blue of the Mediterranean sea, when it begins to be ruffled by the

winds; a variety produced by the buccinum alone, and always understood

by the word conchyliata.[1391] Near the Isthmus of Darien, a sea-snail

has been discovered, which some have supposed to be the murex of the

ancients. In dimensions it is about equal to the bee. Being of extremely

rare occurrence, the Indian fishermen preserve it, when found, in a

vessel of water until they have collected a sufficient quantity for

dyeing a piece of stuff. They then, like the ancient Tyrians, pound it

shell and all with a smooth stone or something which serves them for a

mortar, which as the shell is extremely thin and frail is a task of

little labour, and immediately dip the cotton yarn or stuff in the

liquor thus obtained. The colour resulting from this operation is the

richest purple that can be conceived, which instead of fading by being

passed through water grows more lustrous and brilliant the more it is

washed. Stuffs dyed in this manner are, as may be supposed, exceedingly

costly, and on account of their beauty much coveted by the richest of

the Indian women.[1392]

-----

Footnote 1387:

The buccinum, for example, to give the ruddy hue. Fab. Column. de

Purp. i. 19. Johan. Daniel. Annot. p. 33. Plin. ix. 37.

Footnote 1388:

Beckmann, i. 59, sqq.

Footnote 1389:

Goguet, iii. 20.

Footnote 1390:

Fab. Column. de Purpura, c. i. § 8.

Footnote 1391:

Dalecamp. ad Plin, ix. 62. t. iii. p. 770. Cf. Winkel. iv. 1. § 14.

Footnote 1392:

Valm. de Bomare. v. Murex, p. 169.

-----

The fucus above-mentioned, found on the shores of Crete, was sometimes

employed separately in dyeing fillets, garments, and wool, and the

colour thus produced was still more brilliant than that of the purple

fish, though no means of fixing it could be discovered.[1393] The purple

of Hermione, however, preserved its lustre and freshness for centuries.

Alexander, for example, found in the royal palace of Susa vast

quantities of purple garments dyed at Hermione, which, though they had

been laid up nearly two hundred years, exhibited all their pristine

bloom and beauty; because, observes the historian, the wool had been

previously combed with white oil, and the colour fixed with honey.[1394]

Even in Plutarch’s own time garments of equal age were to be seen, the

purple of which had preserved its brilliance and splendour undiminished.

Nay, a small pot of the dye was discovered at Pompeii which though

covered atop with a thick tawny film had preserved all the deep tone and

richness attributed to the Tyrian purple by the ancients.

-----

Footnote 1393:

Theoph. Hist. Plant. iv. 6. 5. Another method of dyeing purple

prevailed in a district of Asia Minor, where the quality of the

springs would appear to have fixed the colour: “The waters of

Hierapolis were surprisingly attempered for tinging wool with a colour

from roots, rivalling the more costly purples; and were a principal

source of the riches of the place.” Chandler, i. p. 270. The learned

traveller, who is exceedingly sparing of his authorities, doubtless

based his relation on the following passage in Strabo: Ἔστι δὲ καὶ

πρὸς, βαφὴν ἐρίων θαυμαστῶς σύμμετρον τὸ κατὰ τὴν Ἱεράπολιν ὕδωρ, ὥστε

τὰ ἐκ τῶν ῥιζῶν βαπτόμενα ἐνάμιλλα εἶναι τοῖς ἐκ τῆς κόκκου καὶ ταῖς

ἁλουργέσιν. l. xiii. c. iv. t. iii. p. 158.

-----

In dyeing scarlet, the ancients made use of kermes[1395] or cochineal,

found in several parts of Greece, but imported likewise from various

other countries. It was sometimes employed in giving the ground to

purple stuffs.[1396] Garments of this colour would appear to have been

extremely rare among the Orientals, since the admiration excited in

Darius by the scarlet cloak of Syloson, whom he saw walking in the great

square of Memphis, can be accounted for only by supposing that he had

never beheld the like before;[1397] otherwise he would not have been so

captivated by its magnificent colour as to press its wearer to sell it

to him in the street. Syloson presented him the cloak as a gift; but

afterwards, when Darius was king of Persia, he took care to proceed to

court and make the circumstance known, upon which the generous prince

overwhelmed him with his favours. This kind of dye appears to have been

known in Greece from the remotest antiquity, since Simonides supposes

that even the signal sail given by Ægeus to Theseus in his expedition to

Crete was of a scarlet colour.[1398] Sardis was celebrated for its

scarlet,[1399] whence the proverb,—to be dyed with the tincture of

Sardis,—for, to be beaten black and blue. The ancients, however,

generally mistook the insect for the fruit of the holm-oak, upon whose

leaves it feeds; a circumstance which may be regarded as very

extraordinary, when it is remembered that both the insect and the tree

were daily under their eyes.

-----

Footnote 1394:

Plut. Vit. Alex. § 36.

Footnote 1395:

Theoph. Hist. Plant. iv. 6. 9. Cf. Fab. Column. de Purp. i. 13. Don

Juan Pablo Canáls Y Martí, Memorias sobra la Purpura de los Antiguos.

c. v. Phile, De Animal. Proprietat. c. xliii. p. 172, sqq. appears to

describe, though in an indistinct and imperfect manner, the cochineal

insect among the productions of India.

Footnote 1396:

Beckmann, ii. 171.

Footnote 1397:

Herod. iii. 139.

Footnote 1398:

Plut. Thes. § 17. In later times we find Alcibiades, on his return to

Athens, hoisting purple sails in the Admiral’s galley. Plut. Alcib. §

32.

Footnote 1399:

Schol. Aristoph. Pac. 1140. ad Acharn. 118. Cf. Plin. xxiv. 4.

-----

The wool of sheep is said by the Greek poets to have been dyed red on

their backs by eating the madder plant.[1400] The wool of brown sheep

was spun, woven, and worn of its natural colour, as it is still by the

rustics of several European countries. Dyes of every other colour were

likewise known to the ancients; as bright flame and saffron-colour,

pink, green, and russet grey;[1401] deep and sky-blue, produced by

woad;[1402] and red by madder.[1403] The Phrygian dyers made use of a

kind of mineral[1404] obtained from Cappadocia; and wool was sometimes

dyed with a decoction of beans.[1405] Among the Egyptians, linens,

muslins, and all kinds of cloths were painted with flowers and figures,

in a great variety of colours;[1406] which was the case, also, among the

Massagetæ, who impressed on their fine woollen cloths a multitude of

patterns, which preserved their brilliance unfading to the last.[1407]

-----

Footnote 1400:

Virg. Eclog. iv. 45. Beckmann, History of Inventions, iii. 256—_note_.

Footnote 1401:

Poll. vii. 13.

Footnote 1402:

Ισάτις ἥμερος. Dioscor. ii. 215. Cf. Aristoph. Cimon. 332. Nub. 71.

Dioscor. iii. 160.

Footnote 1403:

Beckmann, History of Inventions, t. iii. p. 255.

Footnote 1404:

Dioscor. v. 141.

Footnote 1405:

Id. ii. 127.

Footnote 1406:

Plin. Nat. Hist. xxxv. 42.

Footnote 1407:

Herod. i. 203.

-----

As many kinds of woollens are wholly spoiled by common washing,[1408]

they were regularly, when soiled, carried by the Greeks to the

fullers,[1409] whose mill and trade are supposed to have been invented

by Nycias of Megara.[1410] These artisans made use of numerous earths

and other substances in their operations; such as gypsum,[1411] the

Cimolian earth and the Chian, the Lemnian, the Sardian, the Umbrian, the

Samian, the Tymphæan, and the Chalastræan.[1412] Wool, previous to being

spun, was cleansed by soap-wort.[1413] In washing clothes they commonly

made use of a lye prepared with lime or wood ashes.[1414] Sponges were

blanched in the following manner:[1415] over such as were extremely soft

they sprinkled a quantity of salt-fish, collected from the rocks, after

which they were carefully washed, and laid in the summer sun with their

hollow part uppermost. They were rendered still whiter by being

saturated with salt froth or sea-water, and exposed during a succession

of calm summer nights to the moon’s rays.

-----

Footnote 1408:

Casaub. ad Theoph. Charact. p. 241.

Footnote 1409:

Herod. iv. 14. i. 92.

Footnote 1410:

Plin. vii. 57. Goguet. iv. 6.

Footnote 1411:

Theoph. de Lapid. § 67.

Footnote 1412:

Constant. v. χαλαστραῖον. Theoph. de Lapid. § 64. Plat. Rep. t. vi.

184. Poll. vii. 39. x. 135.

Footnote 1413:

Στρουθίον. Dioscor. ii. 193. Cf. Theoph. Hist. Plant. iv. 10. 3. Plin.

Nat. Hist. xix. 18.

Footnote 1414:

See Mitchell on the Acharnes. 7. Gog. Origine des Loix, i. 279.

Footnote 1415:

Dioscor. v. 138.

-----

The extent and importance of the Grecian fisheries[1416] may be inferred

from the prodigious quantities of fish eaten in every part of Greece;

for although they knew nothing in antiquity of those long fasts during

which the members of the Greek church in modern times, ceasing to prey

upon the dumb inhabitants of terra firma, let loose their voracity

against those of the sea, they were no less partial to this kind of food

than their descendants,[1417] as will have been seen from a preceding

portion of this work. Fisheries were accordingly established on nearly

every part of the coast of Hellas, as well as of those islands and

distant colonies of which she became mistress.

-----

Footnote 1416:

In the heads of certain fish, jewels are said to have been sometimes

found. Athen. iii. 70.

Footnote 1417:

Strabo relates an excellent anecdote in illustration of this passion

of his countrymen. Speaking of the city of Iasos, situated in an

island of the same name on the coast of Caria, whose inhabitants drew

their chief subsistence from their maritime pursuits, and were

abundantly supplied with fish, he adds,—that once upon a time a

celebrated musician was performing in public before the inhabitants of

this city: suddenly the bell which announced the opening of the

fish-market was heard to sound. Away, in an instant, scampered the

Iasians, eager to secure their favourite dainty, all except a single

individual, who appeared to enjoy the performance of the citharador.

Flattered by this mark of his taste or politeness, the musician

approached the man, and said, “I am greatly obliged by the attention

you have shown me, and have to congratulate you on your love of the

art; for all the rest, as soon as they heard the bell ring, ran

away.”—“What then! has the bell rung?” inquired the apparent listener,

who happened to be deaf. “Yes,” answered the musician. “Then good luck

be with you!” cried the man, and rising hastily from his seat, he

rushed after his townsmen. Strab. xiv. 2. t. iii. p. 203, seq.

-----

Thus a celebrated lamprey[1418] fishery existed on the Faro of Messina,

an eel-fishery at Syracuse,[1419] another for taking the purple fish, on

the eastern coast of Eubœa, a second on the shores of Laconia, a third

at Sigæum in Asia Minor, and a fourth in the neighbourhood of Tyre and

Sidon.[1420] Whales and dolphins were caught in the Mediterranean, and

in the Black Sea; thunnies in the same sea, on the Bosporos, in the sea

of Marmora, in the Hellespont, in the Adriatic, and in nearly all the

eastern parts of the Mediterranean. Many kinds of smaller fish afforded

employment to numerous bodies of men in the gulfs and bays of Attica and

the Peloponnesos; and flourishing sponge-fisheries were carried on along

the coast of Crete, and in several other parts of the Archipelago.[1421]

-----

Footnote 1418:

The observations made by Spallanzani on the eel and lamprey fisheries

of Stromboli, may, with equal propriety perhaps, be applied to those

which are found along the roots of Ætna: “The fish here,” he says,

“are very plentiful and large, especially the sea-eels and murænas;

and, during my short stay in this island, I saw a greater quantity

taken than during the whole time of my continuance in all the Eolian

isles. They are, likewise, of an excellent taste. This abundance, I am

inclined to attribute to the volcano, which has continued incessantly

burning from time immemorial; and which, extending to an immense

depth, must necessarily communicate a part of its heat to the

submarine base of the mountain, and to the waters that surround it, in

the gentle warmth of which the fish find a more agreeable place of

resort, and perhaps propagate in greater numbers than elsewhere.”

Travels in the Two Sicilies, iv. 125.

Footnote 1419:

Plut. Timol. § 20. In catching this fish it was customary to disturb

the waters. Schol. Aristoph. Eq. 862. In the polypus fisheries,

besides the difficulty of detaching the animal from its place, there

was supposed to be another, arising from the power it possesses of

assuming, like the chameleon, the colour of the surrounding rocks.

Lucian. Dial. Deor. Marin. iv. § 3.

Footnote 1420:

This fish served for food as well as a dye. Luc. Cynic. § 11. The

cuttle-fish also was eaten as now. Catapl. § 7.

Footnote 1421:

Theoph. Hist. Plant. iv. 6. 5. Poll. i. 97.

-----

In seas frequented by sharks, sponge-fishers necessarily incurred much

risk. They therefore carefully observed every circumstance denoting the

absence of danger, as for example, the appearance of the anthias,[1422]

which is supposed never to be seen in the neighbourhood of any voracious

sea-monster; for which reason it obtained from the Greeks the name of

the Sacred Fish.

-----

Footnote 1422:

Aristot. Hist. Animal. ix. 37. p. 279. 20. Bekk.

-----

The divers engaged in this trade made use, moreover, of many

contrivances to diminish the toil and hazard of their dangerous calling.

Sometimes they poured oil[1423] upon the waves, which rendered them at

once more tranquil and translucent and enabled them the better to carry

on their operations at the bottom of the sea. They made likewise the

first step towards the invention of the diving-bell, by descending with

a large vessel turned upside down upon their heads, taking care that its

edges sank into the water at the same instant, by which means they

carried along with them a quantity of air, and were enabled to continue

a considerable space of time beneath the surface.[1424] A diver and his

daughter are said to have performed good service for their country

during the Median war; for, descending into the sea during a tempest,

they loosened the anchors of many Persian vessels, and thus set them

adrift to perish by the weather; in remembrance of which services, a

statue was erected to both father and daughter at Delphi.[1425]

-----

Footnote 1423:

Dutens, Origine des Découvertes, 145.

Footnote 1424:

Aristot. Problem. xxxii. 5.

Footnote 1425:

Paus. x. 19. 2. Athen. vii. 48. Anthol. Græc. ad Palat. Cod. ed. ix.

296. Cf. Herod. viii. 8. Quint. Curt. iv. 3.

-----

The business of fishing was pursued in much the same manner as in modern

times. Great numbers of smacks,[1426] of all dimensions, crowded the

narrow seas between the islands and the main, making sometimes pretty

long voyages, and taking passengers to augment their gains.[1427] These,

moreover, formed the principal nurseries for the Grecian navies,[1428]

particularly those of Athens, which consequently were manned, in the

better ages of the republic, by the hardiest and most expert seamen in

the ancient world. They employed in their operations both the harpoon

and various kinds of large nets;[1429] and the ease and rapidity with

which they filled their vessels may be inferred from the accounts given

in modern times of the vast shoals of fish of all species and dimensions

which in spring time collect in the eastern extremity of the

Mediterranean, and pour in such multitudes into the narrow stream of the

Dardanelles and the Bosporos,[1430] that, with one sweep of a net, the

fishermen are enabled to fill whole skiffs, while they may be taken by

the hand from the shores, killed like birds with stones, caught with

unbaited hooks, or by the women in common baskets, let down by ropes

from the windows of such houses in Constantinople[1431] as happen to

stand on the beach. Elsewhere the fishermen made use of stop-nets in

rivers or along the sea-coasts where the water for some way out was

shallow. Various kinds of baskets,[1432] also, they had recourse to,

together with the rod and line. Even that barbarous method, still in

many parts of Europe put in practice by the vulgar, of poisoning the

waters, was known to the Greeks, who, for this purpose, cast into

streams or ponds the pounded leaves of the Euphorbia Platyphylla.[1433]

-----

Footnote 1426:

Dion Chrysost. i. 220. Cf. Aristoph. Nub. 878. Ran. 139. Eq. 1220.

Acharn. 367.

Footnote 1427:

Dion Chrysost. i. 220.

Footnote 1428:

See a comparison between the hardy occupations of the citizen and the

hunter in Oppian. Halieut. i. 12. Cyneget. i. 49. The same poet in the

third book of his Halieutics, (35, sqq.) describes the principal

qualities of a fisherman, bodily and mental, such as strength,

watchfulness, love of the sea, all which must have admirably fitted

him for distinguishing himself in his country’s navy.

Footnote 1429:

Plut. De Solert. Anim. § 24. Poll. i. 97. Anglers’ lines were

sometimes made of τέρμινθος, a plant resembling flax. Id. i. 233.

Salmas. ad Solon. p. 911. a. Etymol. Mag. 753, 10. Fishing-hooks.

Goguet, i. 166. Nets were sunk by leaden weights. Poll. i. 97. Cf.

Philost. Icon. i. 13. p. 783. Artemid. Oneirocrit. ii. 14. p. 102.

Footnote 1430:

See in Oppian a long and highly picturesque passage describing the

allurements by which the Black Sea drew into itself those innumerable

shoals of fish which in the text I have described flocking towards it.

Halieut. i. 598, sqq. Cf. Strab. vii. 6. t. ii. p. 112.

Footnote 1431:

Gyllius, De Topograph. Constant. p. 6.

Footnote 1432:

Poll. i. 97.

Footnote 1433:

Dioscor. iv. 165. Plat. De Repub. Cf. Schol. Aristoph. Concon. 404.

See the whole process of poisoning described by Oppian, Halieut. iv.

647, seq.

-----

On the land-locked seas, also, and lakes, and rivers, they pursued that

striking and romantic species of fishery[1434] carried on at

night,[1435] in which a flaming torch held at the boats’ bows allures

the fish to the surface, where by their bright eyes and glittering

scales shining through the transparent water, they directed the aim of

the fisherman’s trident.[1436] A small fleet of this kind of boats

dispersed over a smooth sea under the lea of woody headlands or rocky

shores, each with its bright red light, gliding noiselessly[1437] hither

and thither, discloses a scene of singular beauty to the imagination. In

the paintings of Herculaneum,[1438] we find a landscape representing a

group of fishermen immediately before day, when the dusky shadows are

beginning to be dispersed by the first straggling rays of light which

barely enable us to distinguish the boats, the nets, the rods, the

fishermen themselves, and the picturesque shore on which they are at

work.

-----

Footnote 1434:

Cf. Herod. i. 62.

Footnote 1435:

Chandler supplies us with a picture of this kind of fishing as carried

on in modern Greece: “We embarked with a rougher sea than was

pleasing, and rowed out in the dark towards the island, intending to

fish. We joined our two seines, and the boats parted, moving each a

different way, a man letting the net gently down into the water. We

met again in the centre, when some embers which had been hidden, were

blown up and exposed on an iron grate, the flame was fed with cedar

dipped in oil, which blazing in the wind, brightened over the deep;

the red coals hissing as they fell, and were extinguished. At the same

time we began to clatter with wooden hammers on the sides and seats of

the wherries, to dash with a pole, and to throw stones, disturbing and

driving the fish, and darting a trident or spear if any appeared at

the top, dazzled by the light; sprinkling oil to render the surface

tranquil and pellucid. The men drew up the net with caution, fearing

the fins of some poisonous fish, particularly the scorpion, which is

killed with a blow on the head while entangled, when the danger

ceases. The boats meeting again, they untie the seines, and throwing

the fiery brands into the sea, proceed in the dark to some other

place. This is the common method of fishing in these seas.” Travels in

Greece and Asia Minor, ii. p. 198, seq.

Footnote 1436:

Quint. Smyrn. Posthomeric, vii. 569, sqq.

Footnote 1437:

Cf. Oppian. Halieut. iii. 429.

Footnote 1438:

Antich. di Ercol. t. xii. p. 273.

-----

One of the most profitable of the Greek fisheries was that of the

thunny, which commenced about the rising of the Pleiades and terminated

shortly after the setting of Arcturus.[1439] As this animal always moves

about in troops, and swims near the surface of the water, which it

visibly disturbs in its progress, at the same time blowing sportively,

and uttering a loud noise, the fishermen, on the shores frequented by

it, constantly stationed a number of watchmen along the beach, some

perched aloft on the summits of cliffs, others on detached rocks, rising

out of the waves, or in trees, or on the top of masts set up at certain

distances along the coast, that they might give notice of the approach

of the thunnies.[1440] As soon as the signal was given the fishermen

pushed out with their barks, making a wide circuit, so as to take the

fish in flank. Then letting down their long nets furnished with leaden

weights to sink them, and with cords[1441] wherewith to draw them up,

they formed themselves into a semicircle, which rapidly narrowing round

the shoal drove them towards the land, by which means the greatest

number were either taken in the nets, or speared by tridents.[1442]

Respecting one of these fishing stations, on the coast of Cypros, a very

romantic anecdote is related.[1443] The inhabitants we are told, having

sculptured a marble lion, which they adorned with emerald eyes, set it

up on the tomb of a prince of the country named Hermias,[1444] upon an

eminence overlooking the sea. The splendour of the emerald, penetrating

through the waves, scared away the thunnies, which in truth are

remarkable for their timidity, so that the fishermen of that part of the

island must unquestionably have been ruined had they not discovered the

property of their lion’s optics, and substituted in lieu of the emerald,

eyes less terrible to the pusillanimous herds of Thetis. A circumstance

almost equally extraordinary is related of the strait by which the

stream of the Bosporos disgorges itself into the Propontis. Here they

say a rock of marvellous whiteness is discovered on the Asiatic side

through the waves in the neighbourhood of Chalcedon, which by its

brightness scares away the thunnies, both in their way to and from the

Black Sea. The ancient naturalists remark, that the thunny in this part

of its migrations observes steadily one course, keeping generally on the

Asiatic side in the ascent to the Pontus, where, excepting the seal and

the dolphin, nothing destructive to fish is found, and, after making the

circuit of its shores, returning to the Ægæan close along the coast of

Europe.

-----

Footnote 1439:

Plin. ix. 20. Cf. Schol. Aristoph. Eq. 313. 361. 862. Philost. Icon.

i. 13, p. 783.

Footnote 1440:

Suid. v. θυννοσκόπος. t. i. p. 1336, seq. Aristoph. Eq. 313. Aristot.

Hist. Animal. iv. 10. They who act as sentinels in the catching of the

sword-fish, take their station on a platform in the fishing boat

itself. “In the middle (of the bark) is fixed an upright pole,

seventeen feet high, with ladders to go up it, and a kind of round

platform at the top, for one of the crew, who acts as sentinel, to

stand on. This platform is called _fariere_.” Spallanzani, Travels in

the Two Sicilies, iv. 336.

Footnote 1441:

Poll. i. 97.

Footnote 1442:

Similar methods still prevail in the Mediterranean. “We had,” says

Chandler, “frequent opportunities (while at Genoa) of seeing the

method of fishing within the mole. Several seines are united and

extended so far as to form a large semicircle, but much curved at the

two extremities. The men then retire to some distance, and begin

clattering with sticks or hammers on the sides of their boats; the

noise making the fish rise. One stationed on the yard-arm of a ship,

takes notice which way they swim, and gives directions, until they are

within the net, when they are driven towards the ends, and are soon

entangled; or, trying from despair to leap over, fall on a wing, which

is fastened to long reeds, and kept floating horizontally on the

surface. The reward of much toil was, now and then a few mullet. The

thynnus, or thunny fish, was anciently and is now taken nearly in this

manner, but in shoals which endanger and often break the nets.”

Travels, &c., i. p. 6, seq.

Footnote 1443:

Plin. Nat. Hist. xxxvii. 17.

Footnote 1444:

Cf. Winkelm. ii. 93.

-----

This proceeding they account for by supposing that, of its two dull

eyes, the right sees best, and that, in obedience to the guidance of

this peeper, it makes the circuit of the sea in the manner stated. A

better reason may be, that its peculiar food[1445] is most plentiful on

the Asiatic coast in spring, and on the European in autumn, if, after

all, we are to regard the fact itself as well established.[1446] In this

traject, however, it seems in reality, for some cause or another, to

shun the vicinity of the City of the Blind, which constituted, perhaps,

one of the principal causes of its inferiority to Byzantium.

Nevertheless, a very delicate species of pelamys,[1447] caught there,

was known in the commerce of the ancient world, and transported to all

parts of Greece.

-----

Footnote 1445:

Observations made on the habits of the swordfish may be thought to

give some colour to this relation of the ancient naturalists: “The

swordfish, we are told, is taken by the Messinese sailors in two ways;

that is, with the lance, and the palimadara, a kind of net with very

close meshes. This fishery begins about the middle of April, and

continues till the middle of September. From the middle of April to

the end of June it is carried on upon the coast of Calabria; and from

the end of June to the middle of September on that of Sicily. The

reason of this is, that, by the account of all the fishermen, the

swordfish, from April till June, entering by Faro, coasts the shore of

Calabria, without approaching that of Sicily; and passes the contrary

way from the end of July to the middle of September. We know not

whether it takes this contrary route for the sake of food, or from any

other cause; or whether it be the same fish that passes and repasses;

it is only certain that it does not coast the shore of Sicily but when

it goes to spawn.” Spallanzani, Travels in the Two Sicilies, iv. 331.

-----

We have remarked above, that the taking of the thunny commenced in

spring, when it appears to have been in excellent condition, and very

highly prized. During winter, whatever may have been its quality, it was

not to be caught, since it retired to the depths of the Ægæan, beyond

the reach of nets or tridents. In the heat of summer it was rendered

lean and flabby by the persecution of a kind of worm, which, insinuating

itself beneath the fins,[1448] harassed it incessantly. But, towards

autumn, being delivered by nature from this pest, it again became plump,

and was esteemed excellent eating. The growth of this fish is extremely

rapid, more especially in the Black Sea, where, amid the vast quantities

of mud and slime brought down by the numerous rivers, it finds in great

abundance the food most congenial to its taste.[1449] The thunny,

properly so called, is at present[1450] scarce along the coast of

Mingrelia, where, by the ancients, it is said to have abounded, which

renders it not improbable, that they included under this name more than

one species of sturgeon, a fish still found in great numbers in those

parts of the Black Sea.

-----

Footnote 1446:

Plin. Nat. Hist. ix. 20.

Footnote 1447:

Oppian, who tells a wonderful story about the thunny devouring its

spawn, immediately adds, that the roes which escaped, concealed among

the reeds and rushes, became pelamydes:

Τὰ δ᾽ ἐν δονάκεσσι καὶ ἐν σχοίνοισι μένοντα

Πηλαμύδων ἀγέλας ὥρη τέκεν

Halieut. iv. 510, seq.

Footnote 1448:

Aristot. Hist. Animal. viii. 13. p. 231. 30.

Footnote 1449:

Oppian. Halieut. i. 600, sqq.

Footnote 1450:

Voyages au Nord, vii. 187.

-----

The method of taking the pelamys[1451] has been graphically described by

an ancient writer. A well-appointed and swift bark, putting to sea with

her rowers, dashed out as rapidly as possible into deep water, upon

which one of the crew, stationed at the stern, let down the tackle. This

consisted of two strong ropes, one on either side, to which were

attached a number of small cords, each with a hook at the end, baited

with the Laconian purple fish, and garnished with a feather of the

sea-mew, which, glancing hither and thither in the currents of the sea,

assisted in attracting the eye of the pelamydes. The boat then traced

various lines upon the surface of the deep, now skimming in this

direction, now in that, until it was followed by a shoal of fish, which,

coming up with it, voraciously gorged the baits until not a single hook

was left without its prey. Upon this the rowers desisted from their

toil, and, pulling up the ropes, generally found their boat laden with

the take.[1452]

-----

Footnote 1451:

Pallas supposes this fish to be the Mugil Cephalus, or mullet, from

the eggs of which Botargo is prepared. Travels in Southern Russia, iv.

241.

Footnote 1452:

Ælian. de Nat. Animal. xv. 11.

-----

The manner in which the thunny is taken on the coast of Chili may,

perhaps, be worth mentioning for the sake of comparison. As soon as the

Indians discover a shoal of these fish near the shore they put to sea on

large sealskin floats inflated, like bladders, with air, carrying with

them a sharp-pronged trident, fastened to a tough and very long rope.

They then approach and pierce the fish, which, immediately upon being

struck, darts out to sea with prodigious celerity, the Indian,

meanwhile, rapidly uncoiling his rope till the strength of the thunny is

spent through loss of blood, after which he draws back his prey, and,

raising it upon his float, returns to the shore rejoicing.[1453]

-----

Footnote 1453:

Ovalle, i. 17. Baumgarten, i. 4. Aristot. Hist. Anim. iv. p, 109.

Plin. Nat. Hist. ix. 20, seq.

-----

It is probable that, in this manner of fishing, the Indian draws near

the thunny while asleep,[1454] as we find to have been often the

practice among the Greek fishermen, who when they went forth at night,

at which time the thunny is exceedingly drowsy, were attracted towards

their prey by the white belly of the fish sleeping quietly on the

surface of the water. Many other kinds of fish also appear to have been

taken while asleep, notwithstanding that in general their slumbers are

brief. Thus flat-fish, nestling in the sand or mud, were discovered

through the transparent water, and pierced with the trident. So likewise

the sea-dog, the gilthead, and the mullet, were taken by day, with the

trident, while asleep; otherwise it has been thought they could scarcely

be touched by this instrument. The skate and other fishes of the

Selachian tribe were sometimes found to sleep so soundly, that they

could be taken by the hand.[1455]

-----

Footnote 1454:

According to Oppian, however, most species of fish, like the Olympian

Zeus, refuse to submit to the chains of sleep, and keep their

intellectual faculties perpetually on the stretch. But the Scaros, he

allows, is occasionally caught napping. Halieut. ii. 656.

Footnote 1455:

Aristot. Hist. Animal. iv. 10. p. 109.

-----

On the shores of the Chelidonian isles there was a celebrated anthias

fishery which was carried on in a peculiar manner. The fishermen putting

to sea in their bark, and clad in garments of a sober colour, sailed

backward and forward daily in the same place and at the same hour. By

this means, the anthias, which in great numbers frequents that part of

the sea, became accustomed to the sight of the vessel, and by degrees

approached it, one of the shoal generally preceding the rest. To him the

fishermen threw out something of which the anthias is fond, and

continued to do so until the fish became so tame that they would eat

food from his hand. A hook was then introduced into the bait, and as the

fish crowded around the bark in prodigious multitudes, they were caught

rapidly, and handed to a second person, who threw them into the bottom

of the boat upon heaps of soft rags, lest by their bounding and

struggling they should make a noise and frighten away their companions.

The shadow of the boat assisted in concealing this manœuvre from the

fish. It was considered necessary to spare the anthias which first

approached, since, being probably a kind of leader, his disappearance

instantly put all the rest to flight.[1456] Sometimes it is said

multitudes of these fish were collected round the boat by the striking

of two bits of wood together in the manner of castanets.[1457] The

Milesians[1458] possessed close to their city a very lucrative fishery

chiefly of the sea-dog,[1459] which there attained a larger size than

anywhere else. This is supposed to have been owing to an extensive

lagoon of fresh water, having however with the sea a channel of

communication through which these fish found their way in, where they

grew tame and fat, and were taken in great numbers.[1460]

-----

Footnote 1456:

Plin. Nat. Hist. ix. 85.

Footnote 1457:

Oppian. Halieut. iii. 205, sqq.

Footnote 1458:

Athen. vii. 86, seq.

Footnote 1459:

Remarkable for its voracity. Lucian. Dial. Mort. viii. The sea-dog was

classed by Linnæus among the amphibia; but Spallanzani and M.

Vicq-d-Azyr, restored it, upon more accurate observation, to its place

among the fishes. Travels in the Two Sicilies, iv. 379.

Footnote 1460:

Schol. Aristoph. Eq. 361.

-----

At a point on the gulf of Smyrna, a productive fishery is at present

carried on in a very ingenious manner. The shore being low and level, a

continuous sweep of reed-fences is stretched along, so as to enclose a

considerable space of water, and furnished at intervals with gates,

which are raised occasionally for letting in the shoals. The avenues are

then closed, and the fish taken with facility. On the coast of China a

similar fishery is found, lines of mats being substituted for

reeds.[1461]

-----

Footnote 1461:

Chandler, i. 85. Cf. 151. Osbeck, Voyage to China, i. 199.

-----

There was a small, but apparently productive, fishery in the canton of

Marathon.[1462] The right of fishing in the salt stream of the Rheitæ

was secured by law to the priests of Eleusis,[1463] whose city was

famous for the scombros as well as for soles or turbots.[1464]

-----

Footnote 1462:

Paus. i. 32. 7. Meurs. Rel. Att. c. viii. p. 32. Chandler. ii. 184.

Footnote 1463:

Paus. i. 38. 1. ii. 24. 6. Chandler, ii. 210.

Footnote 1464:

Athen. vii. 24.

-----

The History of the Manners and Customs of Ancient Greece, Volume 3 (of 3) · 第 7 / 15 章