Felipe Pardo as archbishop

[The Dominican side of this controversy is related by Salazar, one of

the official historians of that order, in his Hist. Sant. Rosario,

pp. 490-513 (chapters xviii-xxi); as this account is long, it is

presented here partly in full translation, partly in synopsis.]

On the fourth day of August in the year 1677, dedicated to our

glorious patriarch St. Dominic, a royal decree was received in

Manila in which our Catholic monarch Don Carlos II appointed for

archbishop of Manila father Fray Felipe Pardo--who that year had

completed his second provincialate and now was filling the post of

commissary of the Holy Office. In the latter office he had given,

before this second provincialate, such proofs of good judgment that

report of his abilities had reached Madrid; and these alone, without

any other backing, had procured for him so high a dignity. The

choice of him [as bishop] was received in this community with

universal acclamation and applause, on account of the esteem that

was merited by his abilities, accredited by the experience that all

had of his success and discretion in government--not only in the two

provincialates which he had obtained, but also, as I have indicated, in

the commissariat of the Inquisition; all therefore confidently expected

in him a prelate discreet and accomplished in all respects. Our

father Fray Felipe Pardo alone, distrustful of his suitability for

that office--either on account of his sixty-seven years of age, or

in view of the difficulty of the task--was greatly perplexed about

accepting it. Indeed, it was necessary at the end of two months, to

make requisition on him, in accordance with the rules established by

the councils regarding immediate acceptance by those thus appointed,

under penalty of the appointment being annulled, and the see being

again declared vacant. [He finally accepts (November 11 of that year)

the dignity of archbishop, and by special decree of the king enters

on his duties before being consecrated (which occurs on October 28,

1681), "the first archbishop who has governed this archbishopric

without being consecrated, and the first who has been consecrated in

these islands." Having spent thirty years in that country, he has

much knowledge of it and of its moral and social conditions, and

much experience in ecclesiastical government. "He was very learned

in theology, whether speculative or practical, moral or scholastic;

and very expert in the despatch of business." He is aided in his

duties by Fray Raymundo Berart, very learned in canon and civil law,

who has left great opportunities of advancement in Espana "to come to

this poor province, to serve in the ministry of souls--as he actually

learned the Tagal language, and spent some time in ministering to

the Indians in the district of Batan."]

The church of this archbishopric was in great need of reform, being

full of pernicious abuses, which had been introduced by vicious

practices, shielded by permitted usage; so that now these alleged

right of possession, and that which was public and practiced by many

was regarded as lawful and allowable. False oaths were regarded, not

heeding this despite to the holy name of God, as a matter of kindness,

in exchange for not injuring another person by the denunciation of

his sins; and the oath which the judges take not to engage in trade

was regularly broken, without there being any one who had scruples

in doing so. The friendships and intimacies between the two sexes

were so prevalent that the excessive familiarity which was causing

so many scandals was already no occasion for them [i.e., in public

opinion]. Executorships were hereditary, despoiling minors of their

property, and never rendering accounts [of those trusts]. Trading had

found its way among the ecclesiastics, notwithstanding the ordinance

[constitucion] of Clement IX recently published in these islands; and

at like pace all the vices gained sway, without the least scruple or

reparation, since established practice and custom had now rendered

those vices tolerated. [To remedy these evils, the archbishop

vigorously devotes his energies, notwithstanding his age.]

The first action with which his illustrious Lordship began to carry

out this plan in the government of his archbishopric was, to reconcile

his cabildo with the royal Audiencia in a certain controversy between

them. This was, whether they should give the gospel to be kissed,

not only by the auditor who then provisionally held the government

of these islands (he was Don Francisco Mansilla), but also by his

associate, Doctor Don Diego Calderon. As soon as the archbishop began

to rule, he settled this dispute with great sagacity, and much to the

satisfaction of both sides. Afterward another strife arose between

the ecclesiastical estate and the royal officials, because, at the

time of paying the former their stipends, these were curtailed on

account of the exemption from the mesada which had been conceded

by his Holiness to our Catholic king; and, the amount of what the

ecclesiastics ought to contribute on account of this privilege not

being liquidated, the official royal judges had acted illegally in

the collection of the said mesada, making themselves judges in their

own cause by explaining the bull of his Holiness without consenting

to show it to the interested parties, although the latter had several

times demanded this. But our archbishop, recognizing that what the

royal officials were collecting was excessive, and that it belonged

to his office and dignity to explain the doubts that might arise in

the text of the apostolic bulls, compelled the royal official judges,

by dint of monitory decrees and censures, to display that privilege;

and when it was seen, it was found that they had collected more than

they should for several years past. All this he made them restore,

with considerable advantage to the ecclesiastics, who were extremely

grateful for the zealous activity of his illustrious Lordship.

In almost all the Indias were being celebrated the masses which

they call "masses for Christmas," [148] mingling with them certain

abuses which contaminated these masses with practices that were

superstitious, and contrary to the holy rites of the church. These

were tolerated under the cloak of devotion, and, although to some

they appeared mischievous, they did not dare to rebuke these rites

in public lest they excite against themselves the pious feelings of

the common people, and as this matter was one of those which belong

to the zeal and foresight of the ecclesiastical superiors. Finally

the holy Congregation of Rites, in consequence of the representations

made by zealous persons, on January 16 in the year 1677 declared the

said "masses for Christmas" to be not only opposed to the rubrics,

but also cause for scandals, and of superstitious nature, on account

of certain ballads that were interwoven with them, and other like

abuses. This decree of the Congregation arrived in these islands

in the year eighty; acting in conformity thereto, the archbishop

prohibited the said masses in his archbishopric. They were no longer

celebrated while his illustrious Lordship lived, although afterward

they were again established, but with some abatement--I know not

whether it was so everywhere--of the abuses which formerly were

customary. He also prohibited under severe penalties the practice

of bringing sick persons to the church to receive holy communion

by way of viaticum--a custom introduced into these islands from

the infancy of their Christian faith. It had never been entirely

uprooted, although ordinances against it had been issued by various

zealous prelates in their decrees, and by our Catholic monarchs in

their royal cedulas--commanding that the holy viaticum should be

carried to the houses of the sick, even though they were poor and

of low estate, as are the natives of these islands. And because the

previous ordinances of the king our sovereign on this subject had not

had the desired effect, his Majesty again repeated his commands in a

royal decree of July 28, 1681, in which he charged our archbishop to

banish this abuse, the custom of carrying the sick to the church to

receive the holy viaticum, on account of the difficulties which might

follow from it. In accordance with this, our archbishop promulgated

an edict throughout his diocese, dated September 5, 1682, commanding

that all the parish priests should carry the viaticum to the sick,

without permitting them to be brought to the church; and although

he received from the parish priests entreaties and arguments on

this point, his illustrious Lordship did not listen to them, but

courageously proceeded in his holy undertaking.

Besides those exceedingly just measures, at the instance of the royal

Audiencia of these islands his illustrious Lordship promulgated an

edict--which was affixed to the doors of the churches, with penalty

of major excommunication--that all executors of wills must within two

months present before his tribunal the said wills, which had not been

inspected for fourteen years past; and so numerous were those that

were presented--not to mention others dating back to forgotten times,

which were not yet accomplished--that they gave him work sufficient

for several years. He issued other edicts and monitory decrees in

regard to the denunciation of various crimes, and so many of these

were continually disclosed that soon the ecclesiastical tribunal was

tilled with cases, and the numerous officials in its employ could not

make room for the legal proceedings therein. Very scandalous lives

were revealed, and criminal suits were begun; but these could not be

prosecuted on account of appeals and subterfuges which caused delay.

He who attempts to correct abuses and scandals finds it necessary

to equip himself with courage to meet the hostilities which he will

encounter; for abuses which have already become inveterate, and

scandals favored by indulgence, cannot be overcome without strenuous

efforts and repeated conflicts. Such was the case of a certain prebend

whom the predecessor of his illustrious Lordship had tried to correct,

but had never been able to do so on account of the support that the

delinquent received from a certain potent personage; accordingly the

archbishop's zeal contented itself with giving information of the

whole matter to the king our sovereign--who issued on this matter a

royal decree commanding the said archbishop to correct the scandalous

acts of that prebend, without fear or regard for any power. As

this royal decree arrived at Manila when the said archbishop was

already dead, the king our sovereign despatched another decree to our

archbishop-elect, Don Fray Felipe Pardo, very earnestly recommending

to him the correction of the transgressions of the said prebend. [149]

Notwithstanding the activity of our archbishop, he could not end the

proceedings in this case for eight years, on account of the evasions

of the culprit, and the protection that he found in the officials of

the royal Audiencia, who at every step forbade our archbishop to take

any further steps in the prosecution of the suits, thus preventing

his holy zeal from successfully checking abuses and scandals.

This was made more plainly evident in the suit regarding another

ecclesiastic, the cura of Bigan, against whom the provisor appointed

by his illustrious Lordship (since the government of that bishopric

pertained to him) began to institute proceedings in a criminal suit,

in consequence of various denunciations and accusations. As the

culprit was on intimate terms with one of the auditors, the latter

managed the affair so dexterously that he caused the issue of a

royal decree in which the royal Audiencia commanded the archbishop

to remove thence [i.e., from Vigan] the said provisor and oblige

him to reside in the city of Lalo all to the end that he should not

proceed in the suit. This measure was ineffectual, on account of

the reply and representations made by the archbishop; the provisor

therefore proceeded in his suit. The delinquent, finding himself

in a tight place, fled from Bigan and came to Manila; and, when he

was arrested by the archbishop for this flight, he demanded to be

released on bail--which his illustrious Lordship granted, by an act

in which he designated the city as the prisoner's bounds until his

suit should be ended. The culprit consented to this, thanking his

illustrious Lordship for this concession, and therewith submitting to

his tribunal. Affairs being in this condition, there came [in 1680],

with proprietary appointment as bishop-elect of Nueva Segovia,

a prebend of this holy church, who was an intimate friend of the

culprit; the latter, availing himself of this opportunity, undertook

to shake off the yoke of his illustrious Lordship's authority with an

appeal to the new bishop-elect--who, desiring to shelter the other,

demanded from the archbishop the acts [which he had issued]. As his

illustrious Lordship did not choose to furnish these--as this suit

was firmly established, by the consent of the delinquent himself,

in his metropolitan tribunal--the new bishop had recourse to the

royal Audiencia, asking them to command the archbishop to deliver the

acts. In virtue of the representation made by the new bishop, a royal

decree was despatched to Senor Pardo, in which he was commanded to

deliver the said acts to the bishop of Nueva Segovia; his illustrious

Lordship answered this by saying that the suit proceedings therein

were already established in his own tribunal by the delinquent

having accepted certain acts, and the law, therefore, afforded no

occasion for removing this suit and the proceedings therein from

the tribunal of the metropolitan, and restoring it to the culprit's

ordinary judge. His illustrious Lordship well knew that all these

were frivolous measures of delay, so that the case might not reach the

point of sentence, and the scandals should be left without restraint,

accordingly, although the second and the third royal decrees on this

matter were served upon him, he never consented to yield his rights,

or to acquiesce in the illegal commands laid upon him. For this cause

the officials of the royal Audiencia issued a fourth royal ordinance

and decree, condemning our archbishop to exile; this sentence was not

executed at the time, but with occasion of the new emergencies which

afterward arose, it was enforced with severity in the following year.

Now that the archbishop was on bad terms with the royal Audiencia,

it was easy for the subordinates of his illustrious Lordship to

have recourse to this supreme tribunal in order to challenge the

jurisdiction or appeal from the proceedings of the ecclesiastical

judge; and therefore royal decrees were continually emanating,

forbidding our archbishop to prosecute suits and proceedings, and

commanding him to deliver up the documents regarding them--by which the

course of the suits was hindered or delayed. His illustrious Lordship

answered these requisitions with so much clearness and proof that the

officials who issued them often considered themselves vanquished, and

did not follow up their efforts; and although they resented what they

called rebellion and audacity, they found his opposition so justified

by law that they did not dare to condemn him for disobedience,

no matter how much they chose to give his conduct this title to

outsiders--for these tribunals are not accustomed to hear "no" to

what they ordain in the name of the king our sovereign. And knowing

that the greater force of the replies and representations of the

archbishop depended on the assistance of the consultor, father Fray

Raymundo Berart, they strove to separate the latter from his side,

in order that his illustrious Lordship, destitute of this aid, might

be reduced with more blind submission to the decrees and despatches

of the royal Audiencia; and therefore that court issued a mandate

demanding and requiring our archbishop to remove from his side Father

Berart, and another to the same effect, addressed to our provincial,

to assign that father to a ministry among the Indians. Suitable reply

was made to both these decrees, without causing any change, for the

time, in the aspect of affairs--until, a new occasion and emergency

arising, they again insisted upon this point.

At the first foundation of Manila, only two parishes were formed for

the Spaniards--one for those who lived within the walls, and another

for those who lived outside the city, this latter being located in a

place where at that time most of them were wont to live. Afterward that

site appeared to them unsuitable for the conveniences of human life,

and so they went to live in another part of the city, and even on

the other side of the river which washes it. Consequently, they lived

very far from their parish church, and suffered great inconvenience in

attending it, because it was necessary for the administration of the

sacraments that the parish priest should cross the entire city, or make

the circuit of its walls, and finally he had to cross the river. As

this often had to be done at night, and at other times with the risk

of being drowned through the fury of the winds and waves, it was soon

evident how great difficulty there must be in giving prompt aid to

the sick--especially as the distance of the parish church was so great

that many parishioners lived half a legua from it. On this account the

burials also were solemnized with extreme inconvenience, and without

the processional order which is the custom of the church. Besides

this, it caused great confusion that the Spaniard who was owner of

the house should belong to the said parish, and the servants, whether

Indians or negroes, to that of the territory in which they happened

to be. The Spaniards also were ashamed of having a parish church so

poor and in so wretched a condition, for it was only a shelter of

bamboos covered with nipa. For these reasons the parishioners had at

various times asked that they might be joined to the parishes in which

they lived; and now, on the occasion of a controversy which arose

between the said cura and another parish priest over the question,

to which of them belonged [the interment of] a deceased person,

the Spaniards publicly appeared before the ordinary, asking that he

would assign the parish churches according to the territories, in

accordance with the custom throughout the church. When this request

was considered by his illustrious Lordship, he gave information of it,

and a copy of the petition, to the vice-patron, to whom this matter

pertained by law. The governor showed this to the fiscal of his

Majesty, who approved the desired change; and with this decision the

governor decreed that the parishes should be divided according to the

territories. He gave commission for this to his illustrious Lordship,

who divided and allotted the parishes in the suburbs of Manila, with

the system and order which are observed to this day declaring that to

each parish church belonged all the persons who dwelt in its territory,

whether Spaniards, Indians, or negroes.

Notwithstanding that this arrangement was in every way so judicious,

and had been made by the order of the vice-patron, with the approval

and advice of the auditor fiscal, the former cura of the Spaniards

considered it an injury and injustice, casting the blame for it all on

his illustrious Lordship; and, making common cause with the clergy,

he continued to disturb and disquiet their minds, until finally

the cabildo arrogated to itself authority, interposing a letter to

his illustrious Lordship that was very offensive to his dignity,

complaining of the severity of his government, in terms that libeled

his uprightness, and other expressions that were very unbecoming and

inappropriate to the dignity of a cabildo. Accordingly, for the sake

of their reputation, his illustrious Lordship was not willing to make

the document public, and he only showed it privately to the governor

of these islands--who was deeply irritated at what they had done,

and promised all his protection to the archbishop for correcting

his prebends. The archbishop did not choose to avail himself of

this aid, because he intended to bring them back to sober judgment

by means of kindness and gentle treatment. He therefore replied to

his cabildo with another pastoral letter, couched in affectionate

terms, and full of learning and paternal affection in which he gently

admonished them to recognize and correct their error. Again they

wrote to his illustrious Lordship, in more submissive tone, although

it was apparently only to pay him compliments; for almost on the same

day they appeared before the royal Audiencia with another document,

making complaint against their prelate of injuries, and saying that

although they had represented these to his illustrious Lordship,

he had not answered them to the point. The effect of this petition

was, that the royal Audiencia issued new commands, not only to the

archbishop but to the father provincial of this province, that father

Fray Raymundo Berart (of whom the cabildo bitterly complained) must

leave his association with his illustrious Lordship, and depart to the

ministries among the Indians; this was carried out (at the instance of

the father himself), in order to wreak the wrath of those who were in

power. On this occasion the royal Audiencia also ordered that a secret

investigation be made of the lives and conduct of our religious,

commencing with the archbishop; and, although a beginning was made

in the fabrication of this information, the plan soon fell through on

account of another and public report which was made, by command of the

archbishop, in favor of the religious--in which their reputation was

so well vindicated by testimony that those who undertook to blacken

it through the secret inquiry were left confounded and abashed.

All these occurrences that we have mentioned were preludes and omens

of some outbreak; for the minds of the people were disquieted, and

jealousy of the archbishop was plainly evident on the part, not only

of the clergy, but of the secular government. They were eager for some

fresh opportunity to arise for them to take extreme measures at once

against the archbishop, or at least against the religious of this

province. This soon occurred, in a sermon that was preached in the

cathedral by a certain religious, [150] in which he explained moral

principles that were pertinent to the disorders then prevailing. The

auditors, who were present, began to resent this; and one of them

urged the governor to send a message to his illustrious Lordship,

asking him to order the preacher to leave the pulpit. The governor

did so, in fact: but he himself assumed authority to do this, before

his illustrious Lordship's answer came, and ordered the preacher to

stop his sermon, and proceed with mass--an act extremely injurious

to the dignity of the archbishop, that in his own church, and before

his eyes, the governor (a secular official, too) should interfere

to give commands to the ministers of the church. But his illustrious

Lordship was obliged to overlook this, in order not to cause greater

disturbances or expose his episcopal dignity to the insults of those

who had already, it appears, pronounced judgments in defiance of the

courts of the church, and were only awaiting an opportunity to assail

his jurisdiction and dignity. His illustrious Lordship did not choose

to afford this to them, at that time, although zeal stimulated him to

defend the honor of the mitre; for affairs were now in such condition

that he would [by doing so] cause more injury than benefit.

Notwithstanding the tolerance and patience of the archbishop, on the

second day after the sermon sentence was passed in the royal Audiencia,

in accordance with the representations made by the ecclesiastical

cabildo, against the preacher, condemning him to imprisonment and to

banishment from these islands. This was carried out on the following

day; Villalba was arrested in his convent of Binondoc and conveyed

through the public streets, being finally placed on board a vessel,

in which he was sent to a remote island until the time should come

for embarking him for Nueva Espana. This was accomplished in due time,

with great injury and hardship to that religious, and not less grief

to the archbishop at seeing such dreadful disorders, and even his

zeal powerless to remedy them; for these disturbances had now reached

such a point, and his subordinates had now become so hard-hearted and

rebellious, that they had already lost their dread of [committing]

sacrilegious acts, and did not fear to lay violent hands on the

persons of ecclesiastics and religious. Accordingly, foreseeing from

these acts of violence that which might result to his own person if

some new occasion should arise, his prudence caused him to prepare

beforehand for what might occur in such an emergency, by an act which

he drew up with the utmost secrecy, dated on the twenty-second of the

same month of January in the year 1682. By this act he appointed, for

any such occasion, as governor of the archbishopric the illustrious

Don Fray Gines Barrientos, bishop of Troya and his own assistant; and

made other arrangements--which were mild and reasonable, and worthy of

his apostolic zeal, piety, and gentleness--that would tend to quiet

the disturbances which would arise from any such act of violence,

and to favor absolution from the censures which would necessarily be

incurred by persons who should commit such acts of irreverence. All

this was laid away and kept with great secrecy until the following

year, in which occurred the imprisonment of the archbishop.

These melancholy events did not daunt the fervent courage of his

illustrious Lordship; rather, with apostolic valor and zeal he

proceeded in the correction of evil deeds, notwithstanding that he

had reliable information that his case was already concluded in the

royal Audiencia and sentence of banishment pronounced against him. He

was continually menaced with the execution of this sentence, at every

new difficulty which might arise--in this being like the great pastor

Jesus Christ, who, the nearer He foresaw His arrest, so much the

more freely rebuked vices. It is true that our archbishop in order to

give place to wrath and avoid hostilities, judiciously dissimulated

in some points which concerned his person or his privileges--for many

were the incivilities shown to him at every turn by the members of his

cabildo, who disregarded the customary forms of politeness toward him;

and again, at critical moments in the controversies which arose between

the governor and the archbishop, the latter tried to yield what was his

right, or to overlook the lack of courtesy. But when offenses against

God, or attacks on his church or his episcopal dignity, came in his

way, his apostolic zeal did not allow him to overlook these--the

more, as he was needed by the aggrieved party on account of points

of justice intervening at the time. And of such character were the

events which occurred in the course of this year, and were the final

incentive to the acts of violence committed against his illustrious

Lordship--his zealous attempt to restrain certain ecclesiastics from

carrying on trade and traffic, to which they were greatly addicted and

devoted, in contravention of the pontifical decrees, especially of

a recent ordinance by Clement IX which prohibited the said commerce

to ecclesiastics; and likewise his having endeavored to compel an

executor to render an account of the estate which he had in his charge.

These were the chief motives for the arrest and banishment of our

archbishop; for, the same persons [i.e., the Jesuits] being concerned

in both of those incidents, they again disturbed people's minds, and

stirred them up anew against his illustrious Lordship. Past disputes

seemed lulled, and affairs had been smoothed over and adjusted,

although anger against the firmness and activity of his illustrious

Lordship remained alive; and now the unusual character of these

incidents revived again the old complaints--those who were parties in

this affair uniting with those who were angry at what had previously

occurred. All joined in clamors against the archbishop, treating him

as turbulent, seditious, prejudiced, contumacious, and the like; and

from various speeches and conversations this opinion steadily grew--all

regarding as already certain and evident what originated only in their

mistaken prejudices, and with this basis easily reaching a conclusion

(as occurred with the majesty of Christ)--that it was necessary to

remove his illustrious Lordship from their midst, in order to quiet

the anxieties and disturbances which had grieved all the estates of

the commonwealth. So in the execution of this their undertaking they

did not observe the method and plan which is prescribed in the laws

for cases of so great importance--for there was now no disobedience

or contumacy to a second or third royal decree, or interference with

the royal patronage, or other like causes or motives which could

justify so audacious an act. And solely at hearing the reply of his

illustrious Lordship to two royal decrees, which at the very same time

were communicated to him in regard to different matters--each one of

these being the first one which was issued, in both cases--all the

officials of the royal Audiencia were so irritated that immediately

they proceeded to decree that the sentence of banishment and [loss of]

secular revenues, [temporalidades] which had been pronounced against

his illustrious Lordship in the preceding year, must be executed.

But the controversy of that year was now ended, and the parties

now reconciled, and therefore the cause of this action was not past

but present disputes. These were: that his illustrious Lordship had

refused to absolve a contumacious executor whose name he had posted

as excommunicate; and that he had replied to the royal decrees with

apostolic freedom and liberty--in both these acts displaying his

constancy, and zeal for maintaining his jurisdiction unimpaired. [On

March 29, 1683, the Audiencia decree that the sentence of banishment

be carried out, but it is suspended for two days, that the necessary

preparations may be made secretly, in order to avoid disturbances

like those connected with Archbishop Guerrero's banishment. Pardo

is arrested at midnight, by a large body of officials and soldiers,

and immediately deported to Pangasinan, [151] "where the alcalde of

that province had strict orders to detain his illustrious Lordship

there, without allowing him to leave the provincial capital, or to

perform any act of jurisdiction [152] or authority pertaining to his

episcopal dignity, or to correspond by letter with Manila." On the

same day, various persons are arrested as officials or near friends of

the archbishop. The provisor takes refuge in the Dominican convent,

which is at once surrounded by soldiers, an auditor threatening to

demolish it with artillery; at this, the provisor surrenders himself

to the assailants, but "with certain precautions and securities," and

is kept under guard in his own house. Guards are also placed "at the

bell-towers of certain churches, so that the bells might not be rung

for an interdict. All the household furniture and personal property

[espolio] of the archbishop was confiscated, and placed in the royal

magazines--scrutiny being first made of the most private papers of

his illustrious Lordship, without finding in them anything by which

his enemies could calumniate him."]

The bishop of Troya, Don Fray Gines Barrientos, who had been appointed

governor of the archbishopric by his illustrious Lordship for this

emergency, when he learned of the arrest of the archbishop immediately

presented to the cabildo the document appointing him; but that body

appealed to the royal Audiencia, and, with either their expressed

or their tacit approval, took possession of the government of the

archbishopric. They declared that the banishment of the archbishop must

be construed as the vacation of his see, although their action might

better be called a spiritual adultery--for, while the spouse of this

church was still living, the cabildo intruded their presence in order

to abuse her; and, although in reality they were but sons and subjects,

they had the audacity to occupy their father's marriage-bed. At the

head of this action was the dean, who with dexterity and artifice

lured on the rest to consent to this monstrous deed; and because

one, a racionero, would not consent, they thrust him out of the

chapter-room. Government by the cabildo having been declared, it

was an easy thing for this same dean to cause them to appoint him

as provisor; and in virtue of this fantastical jurisdiction he went

on undoing what had been done, and making blunders--liberating all

those who had been imprisoned by the [ecclesiastical] tribunal,

[153] giving permission to all the clerics to hear confessions,

absolving ad cautelam the excommunicated (especially the executor

[i.e., Ortega] who had been publicly posted), and promulgating an

Octavian peace, like that of which the prophet says, Dicunt, "pax,

pax," et non erat pax. [154]

Among this confusion of affairs, the perplexity that existed in the

consciences of men was very noticeable: for some, endeavoring to

flatter those who were in power, gave their approval to all that

these had done, saying that they had not incurred any censure,

and that the jurisdiction of the cabildo was valid; but others,

with more pious judgment, regarded the said jurisdiction as either

fanciful or monstrous, and therefore felt scruples regarding all

their transactions--and not least in regard to intercourse with

those persons who had taken part in the arrest of the archbishop

and other ecclesiastics. This was the feeling of our religious, and

therefore they endeavored to refrain from intercourse with [those]

secular persons, that they might not incur danger from having

communication with excommunicated persons. [155] This withdrawal

being resented by the parties concerned, they began to calumniate us

as inciters of sedition, saying that with our scruples we disturbed

the peace which the cabildo and their dean had striven to introduce

in this community. In consequence of this, the father provincial was

notified, in the following year, of a decree by the royal Audiencia

in which he was charged and commanded to banish three religious,

the most prominent in his province, to the kingdom of Nueva Espana;

and to send to the province of Cagayan two others, who were lecturers

in theology--all because the Audiencia had concluded that the said

religious, as being the most learned and serious, would persuade the

rest to their own opinion. The father provincial replied to this that

the said religious were not at all to blame, since he had ordered

them to withdraw from intercourse with those who were excommunicated;

[156] then they pronounced against him also sentence of banishment,

which was executed with great severity on the father provincial

and his associate, accompanied by the acts of violence which are

mentioned in the first book. [157] ... The archbishop was very

contented in that place of his banishment, but so poor and needy

in temporal revenues that for his ordinary support he was confined

to what was given him for food by the religious who was minister in

that village; he therefore resided in the convent, like any private

brother in the order, and practiced the duties of [a member of] the

community as if he were a subordinate of the vicar of that house. But

outside of food and clothing he had nothing even for almsgiving; and

therefore in the letter that I have mentioned--written to a lay friend,

a citizen of this city of Manila--his illustrious Lordship asks that,

for the love of God, his friend will send him some rosaries, medals,

and like articles, so that he can make some return for the little

presents which the Indians give him. And by way of acknowledgment for

the hospitality which they had showed him in the convent of Lingayen,

he left in it his sole possession, a piece of the wood of the holy

cross--which he valued highly because it had been sent to him by the

supreme pontiff when the latter issued the bulls for his appointment

to this see. In this exile our archbishop remained during a period

of about twenty months, until at last a new opportunity arose, by

which he was restored to his see by the royal Audiencia.

In the year 1684 a new governor came to these islands, and as soon

as he entered upon his office he began, as an unprejudiced party,

to recognize the blind way in which action had been taken in these

proceedings, and the injuries and bad consequences which might

be feared if affairs continued in this state, especially as the

ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the cabildo was losing repute [estando

en opiniones]. For the remedy of so many evils, he made arrangements

with the ministers of the royal Audiencia that the archbishop should

be restored to his see; and this was actually carried out, by decree

of that royal tribunal, in which the ministers of the royal Audiencia

admit that the ecclesiastical jurisdiction had been snatched from

the archbishop--as if this could be thus taken away, and especially

by lay and secular officials!

Notwithstanding that the decree for the restitution of the archbishop

had gone out from the royal Audiencia, it took much persuasion to

make him acquiesce in returning to his see. One reason was, that he

was not willing to return until his Holiness and the Council should

decide his cause; the other, that he saw the affairs of his church in

such a condition that it was almost impossible to set them right. But

finally, at the entreaties of good men, and as persons very influential

in this colony had gone to bring back his illustrious Lordship, he

made the decision to return to Manila, where he was received with

universal rejoicing and applause.... The holy pastor went about,

looking up his flock, and when he saw it so injured and despoiled by

the abuses, errors, and evil consequences which had been occasioned

by the usurping jurisdiction of the cabildo--and, above all, by the

censures in which so many were involved, affecting the liberty of

their consciences, with disregard for our holy mother the Church--he

undertook to procure the reconciliation of the accused persons,

inducing them first to acknowledge their errors. First of all,

through the intercession of the new governor absolution was given

in private to the auditors (who had been active in his arrest and

in those of other ecclesiastical persons), they humbling themselves

to ask for absolution with certain demonstrations of reverence. The

members of his cabildo he absolved in public, with all the customary

preparations and ceremonies; and the same thing was done with other

persons, laymen, who had been concerned in the said arrests--especially

with the preceding governor [i.e., Vargas] the principal author of

these acts of violence, who, being now a private person, was not on

the same footing as the auditors, who were royal ministers and were

actually governing this commonwealth. There was much to overcome in

this point, in order that the said governor should humble himself;

for he attempted by various means and pretexts to exempt himself from

the jurisdiction of the archbishop--until, finding all paths barred,

he was obliged to subject himself to that prelate's correction, and

to make the necessary declarations in acknowledgement and detestation

of his errors. But at the time of imposing on him public penance he

showed that his repentance was feigned; for he never was willing to

accept that penance, or to submit to the commands of his illustrious

Lordship. On this account he had much to suffer--although the pain

that he had inflicted on the holy archbishop was incomparably greater

than this--seeing how rebellious was his heart, and how little regard

he paid to the censures.

The decision in the archbishop's cause from the courts of Roma and

Madrid could not arrive here as soon as it was desired; for those of

the party opposed to his illustrious Lordship had managed so well

that they seized all the mails in which anything was going that

was favorable to the archbishop, and they only sent to those courts

whatever would contribute to his injury. Accordingly, the good name of

that holy prelate suffered greatly, and he was regarded as restless,

seditious, and disobedient to the royal ministers. But as there was no

allegation made on the side of his illustrious Lordship, and as the

sentence that would be just could not be pronounced without hearing

both sides, the Council were unwilling to settle so important a matter

until all the documents that were in favor of the archbishop should

arrive there. And in view of the allegations made on each side,

although (it is said) the royal Council had uttered the sentence

against his illustrious Lordship, the king our sovereign obliged them

to revoke it, because at Roma the sentence was of contrary tenor, and

his Holiness earnestly charged him to protect the cause of the Church,

and to reflect very carefully on all the events which had occurred

in this case. In consequence of these admonitions from his Holiness,

it is said, our most Catholic king Carlos II summoned the president

of the Council of the Indias, and gave him a severe and sharp rebuke

for having declared sentence against the archbishop--saying, among

other things: "How you have deceived me!" at which the said president

was so grieved that (according to report) he died on the third day

after. Thereupon these matters were again considered in the Council,

with more deliberation; and revoking the previous sentence, declared

that all the irregular measures enacted by this royal Audiencia

were arbitrary and illegal; they also removed from office all the

auditors, for having been concerned in this proceeding [i.e., against

the archbishop]. In the same manner, the supreme pontiff declared

that all those who had taken any part in the arrest and banishment

of his illustrious Lordship, and of the other ecclesiastics were

publicly excommunicated; and he made the archbishop his deputy

judge, in order to absolve them and reconcile them to the Church,

after they should render such satisfaction as, in the judgment of

his illustrious Lordship, was necessary. And to our archbishop he

despatched an apostolic letter, praising his fortitude in defending

the ecclesiastical immunity, exhorting him to continue with the

same courage in any future difficulties that he might encounter;

and to follow his own good example, acting with the same constancy

that he had previously displayed. [Here follows the Latin text of the

brief; before it arrives, Pardo has a fresh opportunity to follow its

injunctions.] Notwithstanding that all the affairs of this commonwealth

were for the time in peace, a new difficulty and occasion arose for the

archbishop to display his constancy in defense of the ecclesiastical

immunity; and, without fearing the threats of a new banishment, he

showed himself steadfast and brave in defending the privileges of

his jurisdiction--so much so, that the royal Audiencia again passed

sentence, of banishment anew, against his illustrious Lordship. They

would have carried this into execution, if it had not been for the

intercession of both cabildos (the ecclesiastical and the secular)

and the holy religious orders who all fell at the governor's feet,

entreating him not to take such a step, which would cause so great

injury to this commonwealth; with this the rigorous intention of his

Lordship was moderated, and this new blow was not inflicted.

Not for this did the valor of his illustrious Lordship grow weak:

rather, in new emergencies (and many of these arose) he bore himself

with invincible courage; nor could his constancy be overcome,

either by regard for meritorious persons, or by dangers, perils, or

threats. For he had a heart and courage of steel (as may be gathered

from his letters written to the governor regarding various affairs)

for defending the rights of the Church--in these letters showing

fortitude like that of a St. Ambrose, of a St. John Chrysostom, and of

other like holy prelates. The holy archbishop was gentle as a lamb;

and all those who knew him affirm that he was merciful and affable;

but in matters touching the honor of God and the immunities and rights

of His Church he was transformed into a spirited lion, nor did he

ever swerve from his course or accept any [personal] advantage. And

it seems that God approved his apostolic zeal and the justness of his

cause, by coming to its defense with the exemplary punishments which

He inflicted on the enemies of the holy archbishop; so that, before

the final settlement of these disputes arrived from Roma and Madrid,

He made evident to the world his innocence, and the injustice of those

who persecuted him--taking just vengeance upon them by their miserable

and violent deaths, and other like calamities. These are not repeated

here, since they are already related at length in the eighteenth [158]

chapter of the preceding book; and God, almost by a miracle, preserved

the life of the holy archbishop so that he might before his death see

his cause concluded in his favor. Thus, if before all the world--or, to

speak more correctly, all hell--had conspired against him, at the last

he was able to see in his own day the union, in his favor and defense,

of the apostolic see on one hand, and the king our sovereign with his

royal Council on the other; and, besides, the Supreme Judge of mortal

men taking just vengeance on his enemies, by which the ministers of

the secular government were warned not to insult again the dignity of

the holy archbishop. And, although various collisions were not lacking,

they did not reach violence and hostilities; for every one feared him,

and regarded him as a holy man whom God assisted and favored.

No other judgment is merited by the exemplary virtues of his

illustrious Lordship; for even those most blind and obstinate in their

prejudices were obliged to confess that the archbishop was a saintly

man--as was said by the auditor who went to arrest him, as has been

previously stated. The holy archbishop was much given to prayer and

meditation, and inclined to silence; he was modest and sedate in

his actions; and he was very watchful in whatever he did that all

should be ordered by the divine law--continually keeping in mind the

account that he must render to God of his ministry, a consideration

which frequently shines out through his letters and other documents

pertaining to the affairs of his high office. And this was the most

potent stimulus which constrained him to act with so much firmness

in the affairs pertaining to his ministry, as is noticeable in the

letters which he wrote thereon to the governor, and are found in

the authentic relation of his acts. In eating he was always very

sparing, not only that he might observe religious abstinence, but

because the delicate condition of his stomach could not endure the

least excess. The holy archbishop lived in extreme poverty, behaving

like the poorest religious in regard to his table, clothing, bed,

and everything else. The province supplied his clothing, of rough,

coarse frieze; and when a garment was torn he himself mended it with

his own hands, as the members of his household have often seen. He

employed the income of his see in doing good to the poor, in aiding

the missions of his diocese, and in the adornment and repair of the

churches. In the university of Santo Thomas he endowed a chair of

canonical law, on account of the need in his church for training in

this knowledge--to the end that the ecclesiastics of this archbishop

might in future be better instructed in a subject so important for

the management of the business in the ecclesiastical court; but this

foundation was not enough to be effective, on account of unexpected

accidents in the country. [159]

At last God chose to reward his labors, and his zeal in defense

of the Church; and thus, the previous storms calmed, God took him,

triumphant over impiety and injustice, from this life to that which

is eternal, with a holy and enviable death. This occurred on the last

day of December in the year 1689, when he was seventy-eight years

of age, most of these employed in the service of God our Lord. [160]

He was given honorable burial at the steps of the clergy-house of our

church of Santo Domingo at Manila: and at his funeral were present

the royal Audiencia and the ecclesiastical and secular cabildos, all

the religious orders, and the rest of this community, all bitterly

sorrowing for the loss of such a pastor and prelate. Although his

government at first ran counter to many who were discontented,

as he seemed to them excessive in his rectitude, yet finally--his

cause justified, and the truth declared by so many tribunals; and

his blameless and holy life being seen [by all]--they hailed him

unanimously as a holy prelate, and an example worthy of imitation. And

even those who formerly regarded his rule as grievous now felt the

lack of such a father, and were grieved that they had not treated him

with more respect, their prejudice not having allowed them to know

his virtue and holiness. The cabildo was left with the government

of the cabildo, and transferred it to the bishop of Troya, Don Fray

Gines Barrientos, a member of our own order--not only to show their

affection for the deceased archbishop, but to make some amends for

the resistance which in past times they had made to his rule, when,

at the time of the banishment and exile of the archbishop, he had

left the bishop with appointment as his governor. Thus the cabildo

made acknowledgment of their past errors, for now were lacking in

their number the two prebends who had been the principal authors of

that resistance, and of all the incivilities shown to his illustrious

Lordship; and these two seditious persons being removed, the rest

professed filial reverence to the mitre and to his episcopal dignity.

The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898—Volume 39 of 55, 1683-1690 Explorations by Early Navigators, Descriptions of the Islands and Their Peoples, Their History and Records of The Catholic Missions, As Related in Contemporaneous Books and Manuscripts, Showing the Political, Economic, Commercial and Religious Conditions of Those Islands from Their Earliest Relations with European Nations to the Close of the Nineteenth Century · 第 27 / 32 题