SECTION VI.

_Of NITROUS AIR._

Ever since I first read Dr. Hales's most excellent _Statical Essays_, I

was particularly struck with that experiment of his, of which an account

is given, VOL. I, p. 224. and VOL. II, p. 280. in which common air, and

air generated from the Walton pyrites, by spirit of nitre, made a turbid

red mixture, and in which part of the common air was absorbed; but I

never expected to have the satisfaction of seeing this remarkable

appearance, supposing it to be peculiar to that particular mineral.

Happening to mention this subject to the Hon. Mr. Cavendish, when I was

in London, in the spring of the year 1772, he said that he did not

imagine but that other kinds of pyrites, or the metals might answer as

well, and that probably the red appearance of the mixture depended upon

the spirit of nitre only. This encouraged me to attend to the subject;

and having no pyrites, I began with the solution of the different metals

in spirit of nitre, and catching the air which was generated in the

solution, I presently found what I wanted, and a good deal more.

Beginning with the solution of brass, on the 4th of June 1772, I first

found this remarkable species of air, only one effect of which, was

casually observed by Dr. Hales; and he gave so little attention to it,

and it has been so much unnoticed since his time, that, as far as I

know, no name has been given to it. I therefore found myself, contrary

to my first resolution, under an absolute necessity of giving a name to

this kind of air myself. When I first began to speak and write of it to

my friends, I happened to distinguish it by the name of _nitrous air_,

because I had procured it by means of spirit of nitre only; and though I

cannot say that I altogether like the term, neither myself nor any of my

friends, to whom I have applied for the purpose, have been able to hit

upon a better; so that I am obliged, after all, to content myself with

it.

I have found that this kind of air is readily procured from iron,

copper, brass, tin, silver, quicksilver, bismuth, and nickel, by the

nitrous acid only, and from gold and the regulus of antimony by _aqua

regia_. The circumstances attending the solution of each of these metals

are various, but hardly worth mentioning, in treating of the properties

of the _air_ which they yield; which, from what metal soever it is

extracted, has, as far as I have been able to observe, the very same

properties.

One of the most conspicuous properties of this kind of air is the great

diminution of any quantity of common air with which it is mixed,

attended with a turbid red, or deep orange colour, and a considerable

heat. The _smell_ of it, also, is very strong, and remarkable, but very

much resembling that of smoking spirit of nitre.

The diminution of a mixture of this and common air is not an equal

diminution of both the kinds, which is all that Dr. Hales could observe,

but of about one fifth of the common air, and as much of the nitrous air

as is necessary to produce that effect; which, as I have found by many

trials, is about one half as much as the original quantity of common

air. For if one measure of nitrous air be put to two measures of common

air, in a few minutes (by which time the effervescence will be over, and

the mixture will have recovered its transparency) there will want about

one ninth of the original two measures; and if both the kinds of air be

very pure, the diminution will still go on slowly, till in a day or two,

the whole will be reduced to one fifth less than the original quantity

of common air. This farther diminution, by long standing, I had not

observed at the time of the first publication of these papers.

I hardly know any experiment that is more adapted to amaze and surprize

than this is, which exhibits a quantity of air, which, as it were,

devours a quantity of another kind of air half as large as itself, and

yet is so far from gaining any addition to its bulk, that it is

considerably diminished by it. If, after this full saturation of common

air with nitrous air, more nitrous air be put to it, it makes an

addition equal to its own bulk, without producing the least redness, or

any other visible effect.

If the smallest quantity of common air be put to any larger quantity of

nitrous air, though the two together will not occupy so much space as

they did separately, yet the quantity will still be larger than that of

the nitrous air only. One ounce measure of common air being put to near

twenty ounce measures of nitrous air, made an addition to it of about

half an ounce measure. This being a much greater proportion than the

diminution of common air, in the former experiment, proves that part of

the diminution in the former case is in the nitrous air. Besides, it

will presently appear, that nitrous air is subject to a most remarkable

diminution; and as common air, in a variety of other cases, suffers a

diminution from one fifth to one fourth, I conclude, that in this case

also it does not exceed that proportion, and therefore that the

remainder of the diminution respects the nitrous air.

In order to judge whether the _water_ contributed to the diminution of

this mixture of nitrous and common air, I made the whole process several

times in quicksilver, using one third of nitrous, and two thirds of

common air, as before. In this case the redness continued a very long

time, and the diminution was not so great as when the mixtures had been

made in water, there remaining one seventh more than the original

quantity of common air.

This mixture stood all night upon the quicksilver; and the next morning

I observed that it was no farther diminished upon the admission of

water to it, nor by pouring it several times through the water, and

letting it stand in water two days.

Another mixture, which had stood about six hours on the quicksilver, was

diminished a little more upon the admission of water, but was never less

than the original quantity of common air. In another case however, in

which the mixture had stood but a very short time in quicksilver, the

farther diminution, which took place upon the admission of water, was

much more considerable; so that the diminution, upon the whole, was very

nearly as great as if the process had been intirely in water.

It is evident from these experiments, that the diminution is in part

owing to the absorption by the water; but that when the mixture is kept

a long time, in a situation in which there is no water to absorb any

part of it, it acquires a constitution, by which it is afterwards

incapable of being absorbed by water, or rather, there is an addition to

the quantity of air by nitrous air produced by the solution of the

quicksilver.

It will be seen, in the second part of this work, that, in the

decomposition of nitrous air by its mixture with common air, there is

nothing at hand when the process is made in quicksilver, with which the

acid that entered into its composition can readily unite.

In order to determine whether the fixed part of common air was deposited

in the diminution of it by nitrous air, I inclosed a vessel full of

lime-water in the jar in which the process was made, but it occasioned

no precipitation of the lime; and when the vessel was taken out, after

it had been in that situation a whole day, the lime was easily

precipitated by breathing into it as usual.

But though the precipitation of the lime was not sensible in this method

of making the experiment, it is sufficiently so when the whole process

is made in lime-water, as will be seen in the second part of this work;

so that we have here another evidence of the deposition of fixed air

from common air. I have made no alteration, however, in the preceding

paragraph, because it may not be unuseful, as a caution to future

experimenters.

It is exceedingly remarkable that this effervescence and diminution,

occasioned by the mixture of nitrous air, is peculiar to common air, or

_air fit for respiration_; and, as far as I can judge, from a great

number of observations, is at least very nearly, if not exactly, in

proportion to its fitness for this purpose; so that by this means the

goodness of air may be distinguished much more accurately than it can be

done by putting mice, or any other animals, to breathe in it.

This was a most agreeable discovery to me, as I hope it may be an useful

one to the public; especially as, from this time, I had no occasion for

so large a stock of mice as I had been used to keep for the purpose of

these experiments, using them only in those which required to be very

decisive; and in these cases I have seldom failed to know beforehand in

what manner they would be affected.

It is also remarkable that, on whatever account air is unfit for

respiration, this same test is equally applicable. Thus there is not the

least effervescence between nitrous and fixed air, or inflammable air,

or any species of diminished air. Also the degree of diminution being

from nothing at all to more than one third of the whole of any quantity

of air, we are, by this means, in possession of a prodigiously large

_scale_, by which we may distinguish very small degrees of difference in

the goodness of air.

I have not attended much to this circumstance, having used this test

chiefly for greater differences; but, if I did not deceive myself, I

have perceived a real difference in the air of my study, after a few

persons have been with me in it, and the air on the outside of the

house. Also a phial of air having been sent me, from the neighbourhood

of York, it appeared not to be so good as the air near Leeds; that is,

it was not diminished so much by an equal mixture of nitrous air, every

other circumstance being as nearly the same as I could contrive. It may

perhaps be possible, but I have not yet attempted it, to distinguish

some of the different winds, or the air of different times of the year,

&c. &c. by this test.

By means of this test I was able to determine what I was before in doubt

about, viz. the _kind_ as well as the _degree_ of injury done to air by

candles burning in it. I could not tell with certainty, by means of

mice, whether it was at all injured with respect to respiration; and yet

if nitrous air may be depended upon for furnishing an accurate test, it

must be rather more than one third worse than common air, and have been

diminished by the same general cause of the other diminutions of air.

For when, after many trials, I put one measure of thoroughly putrid and

highly noxious air, into the same vessel with two measures of good

wholesome air, and into another vessel an equal quantity, viz. three

measures of air in which a candle had burned out; and then put equal

quantities of nitrous air to each of them, the latter was diminished

rather more than the former.

It agrees with this observation, that _burned air_ is farther diminished

both by putrefaction, and a mixture of iron filings and brimstone; and I

therefore take it for granted by every other cause of the diminution of

air. It is probable, therefore, that burned air is air so far loaded

with phlogiston, as to be able to extinguish a candle, which it may do

long before it is fully saturated.

Inflammable air with a mixture of nitrous air burns with a green flame.

This makes a very pleasing experiment when it is properly conducted. As,

for some time, I chiefly made use of _copper_ for the generation of

nitrous air, I first ascribed this circumstance to that property of this

metal, by which it burns with a green flame; but I was presently

satisfied that it must arise from the spirit of nitre, for the effect is

the very same from which ever of the metals the nitrous air is

extracted, all of which I tried for this purpose, even silver and gold.

A mixture of oil of vitriol and spirit of nitre in equal proportions

dissolved iron, and the produce was nitrous air; but a less degree of

spirit of nitre in the mixture produced air that was inflammable, and

which burned with a green flame. It also tinged common air a little red,

and diminished it, though not much.

The diminution of common air by a mixture of nitrous air, is not so

extraordinary as the diminution which nitrous air itself is subject to

from a mixture of iron filings and brimstone, made into a paste with

water. This mixture, as I have already observed, diminishes common air

between one fifth and one fourth, but has no such effect upon any kind

of air that has been diminished, and rendered noxious by any other

process; but when it is put to a quantity of nitrous air, it diminishes

it so much, that no more than one fourth of the original quantity will

be left.

The effect of this process is generally perceived in five or six hours,

about which time the visible effervesence of the mixture begins; and in

a very short time it advances so rapidly, that in about an hour almost

the whole effect will have taken place. If it be suffered to stand a day

or two longer, the air will still be diminished farther, but only a very

little farther, in proportion to the first diminution. The glass jar,

in which the air and this mixture have been confined, has generally been

so much heated in this process, that I have not been able to touch it.

Nitrous air thus diminished has not so strong a smell as nitrous air

itself, but smells just like common air in which the same mixture has

stood; and it is not capable of being diminished any farther, by a fresh

mixture of iron and brimstone.

Common air saturated with nitrous air is also no farther diminished by

this mixture of iron filings and brimstone, though the mixture ferments

with great heat, and swells very much in it.

Plants die very soon, both in nitrous air, and also in common air

saturated with nitrous air, but especially in the former.

Neither nitrous air, nor common air saturated with nitrous air, differ

in specific gravity from common air. At least, the difference is so

small, that I could not be sure there was any; sometimes about three

pints of it seeming to be about half a grain heavier, and at other times

as much lighter than common air.

Having, among other kinds of air, exposed a quantity of nitrous air to

water out of which the air had been well boiled, in the experiment to

which I have more than once referred (as having been the occasion of

several new and important observations) I found that 19/20 of the whole

was absorbed. Perceiving, to my great surprize, that so very great a

proportion of this kind of air was miscible with water, I immediately

began to agitate a considerable quantity of it, in a jar standing in a

trough of the same kind of water; and, with about four times as much

agitation as fixed air requires, it was so far absorbed by the water,

that only about one fifth remained. This remainder extinguished flame,

and was noxious to animals.

Afterwards I diminished a pretty large quantity of nitrous air to one

eighth of its original bulk, and the remainder still retained much of

its peculiar smell, and diminished common air a little. A mouse also

died in it, but not so suddenly as it would have done in pure nitrous

air. In this operation the peculiar smell of nitrous air is very

manifest, the water being first impregnated with the air, and then

transmitting it to the common atmosphere.

This experiment gave me the hint of impregnating water with nitrous air,

in the manner in which I had before done it with fixed air; and I

presently found that distilled water would imbibe about one tenth of its

bulk of this kind of air, and that it acquired a remarkably acid and

astringent taste from it. The smell of water thus impregnated is at

first peculiarly pungent. I did not chuse to swallow any of it, though,

for any thing that I know, it may be perfectly innocent, and perhaps, in

some cases, salutary.

This kind of air is retained very obstinately by water. In an exhausted

receiver a quantity of water thus saturated emitted a whitish fume, such

as sometimes issues from bubbles of this air when it is first generated,

and also some air-bubbles; but though it was suffered to stand a long

time in this situation, it still retained its peculiar taste; but when

it had stood all night pretty near the fire, the water was become quite

vapid, and had deposited a filmy kind of matter, of which I had often

collected a considerable quantity from the trough in which jars

containing this air had stood. This I suppose to be a precipitate of the

metal, by the solution of which the nitrous air was generated. I have

not given so much attention to it as to know, with certainty, in what

circumstances this _deposit_ is made, any more than I do the matter

deposited from inflammable air above-mentioned; for I cannot get it, at

least in any considerable quantity, when I please; whereas I have often

found abundance of it, when I did not expect it at all.

The nitrous air with which I made the first impregnation of water was

extracted from copper; but when I made the impregnation with air from

quicksilver, the water had the very same taste, though the matter

deposited from it seemed to be of a different kind; for it was whitish,

whereas the other had a yellowish tinge. Except the first quantity of

this impregnated water, I could never deprive any more that I made of

its peculiar taste. I have even let some of it stand more than a week,

in phials with their mouths open, and sometimes very near the fire,

without producing any alteration in it[6].

Whether any of the spirit of nitre contained in the nitrous air be mixed

with the water in this operation, I have not yet endeavoured to

determine. This, however, may probably be the case, as the spirit of

nitre is, in a considerable degree, volatile[7].

It will perhaps be thought, that the most _useful_, if not the most

remarkable, of all the properties of this extraordinary kind of air, is

its power of preserving animal substances from putrefaction, and of

restoring those that are already putrid, which it possesses in a far

greater degree than fixed air. My first observation of this was

altogether casual. Having found nitrous air to suffer so great a

diminution as I have already mentioned by a mixture of iron filings and

brimstone, I was willing to try whether it would be equally diminished

by other causes of the diminution of common air, especially by

putrefaction; and for this purpose I put a dead mouse into a quantity of

it, and placed it near the fire, where the tendency to putrefaction was

very great. In this case there was a considerable diminution, viz. from

5-1/4 to 3-1/4; but not so great as I had expected, the antiseptic power

of the nitrous air having checked the tendency to putrefaction; for

when, after a week, I took the mouse out, I perceived, to my very great

surprize, that it had no offensive smell.

Upon this I took two other mice, one of them just killed, and the other

soft and putrid, and put them both into the same jar of nitrous air,

standing in the usual temperature of the weather, in the months of July

and August of 1772; and after twenty-five days, having observed that

there was little or no change in the quantity of the air, I took the

mice out; and, examining them, found them both perfectly sweet, even

when cut through in several places. That which had been put into the air

when just dead was quite firm; and the flesh of the other, which had

been putrid and soft, was still soft, but perfectly sweet.

In order to compare the antiseptic power of this kind of air with that

of fixed air, I examined a mouse which I had inclosed in a phial full of

fixed air, as pure as I could make it, and which I had corked very

close; but upon opening this phial in water about a month after, I

perceived that a large quantity of putrid effluvium had been generated;

for it rushed with violence out of the phial; and the smell that came

from it, the moment the cork was taken out, was insufferably offensive.

Indeed Dr. Macbride says, that he could only restore very thin pieces

of putrid flesh by means of fixed air. Perhaps the antiseptic power of

these kinds of air may be in proportion to their acidity.

If a little pains were taken with this subject, this remarkable

antiseptic power of nitrous air might possibly be applied to various

uses, perhaps to the preservation of the more delicate birds, fishes,

fruits, &c. mixing it in different proportions with common or fixed air.

Of this property of nitrous air anatomists may perhaps avail themselves,

as animal substances may by this means be preserved in their natural

soft state; but how long it will answer for this purpose, experience

only can shew.

I calcined lead and tin in the manner hereafter described in a quantity

of nitrous air, but with very little sensible effect; which rather

surprized me; as, from the result of the experiment with the iron

filings and brimstone, I had expected a very great diminution of the

nitrous air by this process; the mixture of iron filings and brimstone,

and the calcination of metals, having the same effect upon common air,

both of them diminishing it in nearly the same proportion. But though I

made the metals _fume_ copiously in nitrous air, there might be no real

_calcination_, the phlogiston not being separated, and the proper

calcination prevented by there being no _fixed_ _air_, which is

necessary to the formation of the calx, to unite with it.

Nitrous air is procured from all the proper metals by spirit of nitre,

except lead, and from all the semi-metals that I have tried, except

zinc. For this purpose I have used bismuth and nickel, with spirit of

nitre only, and regulus of antimony and platina, with _aqua regia_.

I got little or no air from lead by spirit of nitre, and have not yet

made any experiments to ascertain the nature of this solution. With zinc

I have taken a little pains.

Four penny-weights and seventeen grains of zinc dissolved in spirit of

nitre, to which as much water was added, yielded about twelve ounce

measures of air, which had, in some degree, the properties of nitrous

air, making a slight effervescence with common air, and diminishing it

about as much as nitrous air, which had been itself diminished one half

by washing in water. The smell of them both was also the same; so that I

concluded it to be the same thing, that part of the nitrous air, which

is imbibed by water, being retained in this solution.

In order to discover whether this was the case, I made the solution boil

in a sand-heat. Some air came from it in this state, which seemed to be

the same thing, with nitrous air diminished about one sixth, or one

eighth, by washing in water. When the fluid part was evaporated, there

remained a brown fixed substance, which was observed by Mr. Hellot, who

describes it, Ac. Par. 1735, M. p. 35. A part of this I threw into a

small red-hot crucible; and covering it immediately with a receiver,

standing in water, I observed that very dense red fumes rose from it,

and filled the receiver. This redness continued about as long as that

which is occasioned by a mixture of nitrous and common air; the air was

also considerably diminished within the receiver. This substance,

therefore, must certainly have contained within it the very same thing,

or principle, on which the peculiar properties of nitrous air depend.

It is remarkable, however, that though the air within the receiver was

diminished about one fifth by this process, it was itself as much

affected with a mixture of nitrous air, as common air is, and a candle

burned in it very well. This may perhaps be attributed to some effect of

the spirit of nitre, in the composition of that brown substance.

Nitrous air, I find, will be considerably diminished in its bulk by

standing a long time in water, about as much as inflammable air is

diminished in the same circumstances. For this purpose I kept for some

months a quart-bottle full of each of these kinds of air; but as

different quantities of inflammable air vary very much in this respect,

it is not improbable but that nitrous air may vary also.

From one trial that I made, I conclude that nitrous air may be kept in a

bladder much better than most other kinds of air. The air to which I

refer was kept about a fortnight in a bladder, through which the

peculiar smell of the nitrous air was very sensible for several days. In

a day or two the bladder became red, and was much contracted in its

dimensions. The air within it had lost very little of its peculiar

property of diminishing common air.

I did not endeavour to ascertain the exact quantity of nitrous air

produced from given quantities, of all the metals which yield it; but

the few observations which I did make for this purpose I shall recite in

this place:

dwt. gr.

6 0 of silver yielded 17-1/2 ounce measures.

5 19 of quicksilver 4-1/2

1 2-1/2 of copper 14-1/2

2 0 of brass 21

0 20 of iron 16

1 5 of bismuth 6

0 12 of nickel 4

FOOTNOTES:

[6] I have since found, that nitrous air has never failed to escape from

the water, which has been impregnated with it, by long exposure to the

open air.

[7] This suspicion has been confirmed by the ingenious Mr. Bewley, of

Great Massingham in Norfolk, who has discovered that the acid taste of

this water is not the necessary consequence of its impregnation with

nitrous air, but is the effect of the _acid vapour_, into which part of

this air is resolved, when it is decomposed by a mixture with common

air. This, it will be seen, exactly agrees with my own observation on

the constitution of nitrous air, in the second part of this work. A more

particular account of Mr. Bewley's observation will be given in the

_Appendix_.

Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air · 第 6 / 11 章