8. #þet wes#: comp. 1/10, where the verb is plural.

10. #hu--ferde#, how things went on there: ‘quia deus voluit ut Paulus

videret penas inferni,’ B iv. 75/5. #Mihhal--wuniende#, there is nothing

corresponding in B iv, but James has, ‘dixit [angelus] mihi: Veni et

sequere me, et ostendam tibi animas impiorum et peccatorum ut cognoscas

qualis sit locus,’ 28/17, and Adam de Ros, ‘Seint michiel en ueit auant

| Sein pol ses hores disant,’ Ward, ii. 410.

15, 16. #eȝen#: probably a mistake for eren (= ‘auribus’ B iv), as

Kölbing pointed out in ES xxii. 137. #hefede#, by the hair, ‘capillis.’

#heorte#: a strange substitution for ‘brachiis’ of B iv.

16. #ouen--leies#: ‘fornacem ignis ardentem per septem flammas in

diversis coloribus,’ B iv. #he#, i.e. ouen; if not a mistake for þe, a

striking example of parataxis.

17. #eateliche to bi haldene#: comp. ‘eatolice on to seonne,’ Beda,

240/21; the _dat. inf._ answers to the L. supine as in terribilis

aspectu. In #sead . . . to iseonne#, 133/30, it corresponds to the

genitive of the L. gerund, aspiciendi.

18. #strengre#: see 21/94 note, and comp. ‘ne geþæncaþ hio na, hu strang

hit biþ an helle to bionne,’ Wulfstan, 225/12.

21. #meister deoflen#, principal devils: for this use of meister comp.

KH 642 note. They are not in B iv, but F iv has ‘Soignours, an l’apre

fornoise habitent · vij · delo[u]rs | · vij · diable l’atisent: cest lor

maistre labours | Et · vij · flames an issent de diverses colours.’

#swilc#, as if; OE. #swilce#, _conj._; comp. ‘He . . . geseah |

modiglice menn on merebate | sittan siðfrome swylce hie ofer sæ comon,’

Andreas, 247; ‘mon geseah swelce hit wære an gylden hring on heofonum,’

Orosius, 234/8; ‘þe king Leir iwerðe swa blac[;] swlch hit a blac cloð

weoren,’ L 3069. #Swylc swa# is also found with the same conjunctive

sense, ‘þyslic me is gesewen . . . þis andwearde lif . . . swylc swa þu

æt swæsendum sitte,’ Beda, 134/24. For #swilc swa#, such as, 76/29, see

34/80 note.

24. #þe sea of helle#: B iv has ‘Et septem plage erant in circuitu eius

(i.e. fornacis): prima nix, secunda glacies’ &c. The writer or his

original has changed these plagues of the furnace into waves ‘uþe’ of

the ‘flumen orribile in quo multe bestie dyabolice erant quasi pisces in

medio maris,’ which is mentioned at a later point in the Latin, while he

alters the river into a lake, perhaps due to a recollection of the

‘stagnum ignis et sulphuris’ of the Apocalypse, xx. 9.

Selections from Early Middle English, 1130-1250. Part 2: Notes · 第 257 / 959 题