II. Notice the grand mysterious transference of this office to Jehovah.

This singular institution was gradually discerned to be charged with

lofty meaning and to be capable of being turned into a dim shadowing of

something greater than itself. You will find that God begins to be

spoken of in the later portions of Scripture as the Kinsman-Redeemer. I

reckon eighteen instances, of which thirteen are in the second half of

Isaiah. The reference is, no doubt, mainly to the great deliverance

from captivity in Egypt and Babylon, but the thought sweeps a much

wider circle and goes much deeper down than these historical facts.

There was in it some dim feeling that though God was separated from

them by all the distance between finitude and infinitude, yet they were

nearer to Him than to any one else; that the nearest living relation

whom these poor persecuted Jews had was the Lord of Hosts, beneath

whose wings they might come to trust. Therefore does the prophet kindle

into rapture and triumphant confidence as he thinks that the Lord of

Hosts, mighty, unspeakable, high above our thoughts, our words, or our

praise, is Israel's Kinsman, and, therefore, their Redeemer. How

profound a consciousness that man was made in the image of God, and

that, in spite of all the gulf between finite and infinite, and the yet

deeper gulf between sinful man and righteous God, He was closer to a

poor struggling soul than even the dearest were, must have been at all

events dawning on the prophet who dared to think of the Holy One in the

Heavens as Israel's Kinsman. No doubt, he was dwelling mostly on

historical outward deliverances wrought for the nation, and his idea of

Israel's kinship to God applied to the people, not to individuals, and

meant chiefly that the nation had been chosen for God's. But still the

thought must have been felt to be great and wonderful, and some faint

apprehension of the yet deeper sense in which it is true that God is

the next-of-kin to every soul and ready to be its Redeemer, would no

doubt begin to be felt.

The deepening of the idea from a reference to external and national

deliverances, and the large, dim hopes which clustered round it, may be

illustrated by one or two significant instances. Take, for example,

that mysterious and very beautiful utterance in the Book of Job, where

the man, in the very depth of his despair, and just because there is

not a human being that has any drop of pity for him, turns from earth,

and striking confidence out of his very despair, like fire from flint,

sees there his Kinsman-Redeemer. 'I know that my Redeemer liveth.' Men

may mock him, friends may turn against him, the wife of his bosom may

tempt him, comforters may pour vitriol instead of oil into his wounds,

yet he, sitting on his dunghill there, poverty-stricken and desolate,

knows that God is of kin to him, and will do the kinsman's part by him.

The very metaphor implies that the divine intervention which he expects

is to take place after his death. It was a dead man whose blood the

Goel avenged. Thus the view which sees in the subsequent words a hope,

however dim and undefined, of an experience of a divine manifestation

on his behalf beyond the grave is the only one which gives its full

force to the central idea of the passage, as well as to the obscure

individual expressions. Most strikingly, then, he goes on to say,

carrying out the allusion, 'and that he shall stand at the last upon

the dust.' Little did it boot the murdered man, lying there stark, with

the knife in his bosom, that the murderer should be slain by the swift

justice of his kinsman-avenger, but Job felt that, in some mysterious

way, God would appear for him, after he had been laid in the dust, and

that he would somehow share in the gladness of His manifestation--for

he believes that 'without his flesh' he will see God, 'whom I shall see

for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another.' Large and

mysterious hopes are gathering round the metaphor, which flash some

light into the darkness of the grave, and give to the troubled soul the

assurance that when life with all its troubles is past, and flesh has

seen corruption, the inmost personal being of every man who commits his

cause to God will behold Him coming forth his Kinsman-Redeemer.

Another illustration of the hopes which gathered round this image is

found in the great psalm which prophesies of the true King of Peace, in

language too wide for any poetical licence to warrant if intended only

to describe a Jewish king (Ps. lxxii. 14). The universal dominion of

this great King is described in terms which, though they may be partly

referred to the Jewish monarchy at its greatest expansion, sweep far

beyond its bounds in exulting anticipation that 'all kings shall fall

down before Him, all nations shall serve Him.' The reason for this

world-wide dominion is not military power, as was the case with the

warrior kings of old, who bound nations together for a little while in

an artificial unity with iron chains, but His dominion is universal,

'_for_ He shall deliver the needy when he crieth,...He shall _redeem_

their souls from oppression and violence, and precious shall their

blood be in His sight.' Two of the functions of the Kinsman-Redeemer

are here united. He buys back slaves from their tyrannous masters, and

He avenges their shed blood. And because His Kingdom is a kingdom of

gentle pity and loving help, because He is of the same blood with His

subjects, and brings liberty to the captives, therefore it is universal

and everlasting. For the strongest thing in all the world is love, and

He who can staunch men's wounds, and will hear their cries and help

them, will rule them with authority which conquerors cannot wield.

This universal King, the kinsman and the sovereign of all the needy, is

not God. A human figure is rising before the prophet-psalmist's eye,

whose meekness as well as His majesty, and whose kingdom as well as His

redeeming power, seem to pass beyond human limits. Divine offices seem

to be devolved on a man's shoulders. Dim hopes are springing which

point onwards. So that great psalm leads us a step further.

III. See the perfect fulfilment of this divine office by the man Christ

Jesus.

Job's anticipation and the psalmist's rapturous vision are fulfilled in

the Incarnate Word, in whom God comes near to us all and makes Himself

kindred to our flesh, that He may discharge all those blessed offices,

of redeeming from slavery, of recovering our alienated inheritance, and

of guarding our lives, which demand at once divine power and human

nearness. Christ is our Kinsman. True, the divine nature and the human

are nearly allied, so that even apart from the Incarnation, men may

feel that none is so truly and closely akin to them as their Father in

Heaven is. But how much more blessed than even that kinship is the

consanguinity of Christ, who is doubly of kin to each soul of man, both

because in His true manhood He is bone of our bone and flesh of our

flesh, and because in His divinity He is nearer to us than the closest

human kindred can ever be. By both He comes so near to us that we may

clasp Him by our faith, and rest upon Him, and have Him for our nearest

friend, our brother. He is nearer to each of us than our dearest is. He

loves us with the love of kindred, and can fill our hearts and wills,

and help our weakness in better, more inward ways than all sympathy and

love of human hearts can do. Between the atoms of the densest of

material bodies there is an interspace of air, as is shown by the fact

that everything is compressible if you can find the force sufficient to

compress it. That is to say, in the material universe no particle

touches another. And so in the spiritual region, there is an awful film

of separation between each of us and all others, however closely we may

be united. We each live on our own little island in the deep, 'with

echoing straits between us thrown.' We have a solemn consciousness of

personality, of responsibility unshared by any, of a separate destiny

parting us from our dearest. Arms may be twined, but they must be

unlinked some day, and each in turn must face the awful solitude of

death, as each has really faced that scarcely less awful solitude of

life, alone. But 'he that is joined to the Lord is one spirit,' and our

kinsman, Christ, will come so near to us, that we shall be in Him and

He in us, one spirit and one life. He is your nearest relation, nearer

than husband, wife, parent, brother, sister, or friend. He is nearer to

you than your very selves. He is your better self. That is His

qualification for His office.

Because He is man's kinsman, He buys back His enslaved brethren. The

bondage from which 'one of His brethren' might 'redeem' the Israelite

was a voluntary bondage into which he had sold himself. And such is our

slavery. None can rob us of our freedom but ourselves. The world and

the flesh and the devil cannot put their chains on us unless our own

wills hold out our hands for the manacles.

And, alas! it is often an unsuspected slavery. 'How sayest thou, ye

shall be made free. We were never in bondage to any man,' boasted the

angry disputants with Christ. And if they had lifted up their eyes they

might have seen from the Temple courts in which they stood, the citadel

full of Roman soldiers, and perhaps the golden eagles gleaming in the

sunshine on the loftiest battlements. Yet with that strange power of

ignoring disagreeable facts they dared to assert their freedom. 'Never

in bondage to any man!'--what about Egypt, and Assyria, and Babylon?

Had there never been an Antiochus? Was Rome a reality? Did it lay no

yoke on them? Was it all a dream?

Some of us are just as foolish, and try as desperately to annihilate

facts by ignoring them, and to make ourselves free by passionately

denying that we are slaves. But 'he that committeth sin is the slave of

sin.' That sounds a paradox. I am master of my own actions, you may

say, and never freer than when I break the bonds of right and duty and

choose to do what is contrary to them, for no reason on earth but

because I choose. That is liberty, emancipation from the burdensome

restraints which your narrow preaching about law and conscience would

impose. Yes, you are masters of your actions, and your sinful actions

very soon become masters of you. Do we not know that that is true? You

fall into, or walk into a habit, and then it gets the mastery of you,

and you cannot get rid of it. Whosoever sets his foot upon that

slippery inclined plane of wrongdoing, after he has gone a little way,

gravitation is too much for him and away he goes down the hill.

'Whosoever committeth sin is the slave of sin.' Did you ever try to

kill a bad habit, a vice? Did you find it easy work? Was it not your

master? You thought that a chain no stronger than a spider's web was

round your wrist till you tried to break it; and then you found it a

chain of adamant. Many men who boast themselves free are 'tied and

bound with the cords of their sins.'

Dreaming of freedom, you have sold yourself, and that 'for nought.' Is

that not true, tragically true?

What have you made out of sin? Is the game worth the candle? Will it

continue to be so? Ye shall be redeemed without money, for Jesus Christ

laid down His life for you and me, that by His death we might receive

forgiveness and deliverance from the power of sin. And so your Kinsman,

nearer to you than all else, has bought you back. Do not refuse the

offered emancipation, but 'if thou mayest be made free, use it rather.'

Be not like the spiritless slaves, for whose servile choice the law

provided, who had rather remain bond than go out free. Surely when

Christ calls you to liberty, you will not turn from Him to the

tyrannous masters whom you have served, and, like the Hebrew slave, let

them fasten you to their door-posts with their awl through your ear. Do

you hug your chains and prefer your bondage?

Your Kinsman-Redeemer brings back your squandered inheritance, which is

God. God is the only possession that makes a man rich. He alone is

worth calling 'my portion.' It is only when we have God in our hearts,

God in our heads, God in our souls, God in our life--it is only when we

love Him, and think about Him, and obey Him, and bring our characters

into harmony with Him, and so possess Him--it is only then that we

become truly rich. No other possession corresponds to our capacities so

as to fill up all our needs and satisfy all our being. No other

possession passes into our very substance and becomes inseparable from

ourselves. So the mystical fervour of the psalmist's devotion spoke a

simple prose truth when he exclaimed, 'The Lord is the portion of mine

inheritance and of my cup.'

We have squandered our inheritance. We have sinned away fellowship with

God. We have flung away our true wealth, 'wasted our substance in

riotous living.' And here is our Elder Brother, our nearest relative,

who has always been with the Father; but who, instead of grudging the

prodigals their fatted calf and their hearty welcome when they come

back, has Himself, by the sacrifice of Himself, won for them the

inheritance, its earnest in the possession of God's spirit here and its

completion in the broad fields of 'the inheritance of the saints in

light,' the entire fruition and possession of the divine in the life to

come. 'If children, then heirs, heirs of God and joint heirs with

Christ.'

Your Kinsman-Redeemer will keep your lives under His care, and be ready

to plead your cause. 'He that touches you, touches the apple of Mine

eye.' 'He reproved kings for their sake, saying, Touch not Mine

anointed.' Not in vain does the cry go up to Him, 'Avenge, O Lord, Thy

slaughtered saints,'--and if no apparent retribution has followed, and

if often His servant's blood seems to have been shed in vain, still we

know that it has often been the seed of the Church, and that He who

puts our tears into His bottle will not count our blood less precious

in His sight. So we may rest confident that our Kinsman-Redeemer will

charge Himself with pleading our cause and intervening in our behalf,

that He will compass us about with His protection, and that we are knit

so close to Him that our woes and foes are His, and that we cannot die

as long as He lives.

So, dear brethren, be sure of this, that if only you will take Christ

for your Saviour and brother, your Helper and Friend, if only you will

rest yourself upon that complete sacrifice which He has made for the

sins of the world, He will give you liberty, and restore your lost

inheritance, and your blood shall be precious in His sight, and He will

keep His hand around you and preserve you; and finally will bring you

into His home and yours. 'In Him we have redemption through His blood,'

and He comes to every one of you now, even through my poor lips, with

His ancient word of merciful invitation: 'Behold! I have blotted out as

a cloud thy sins and as a thick cloud thy transgressions. Turn unto Me,

for I have redeemed thee.'

'AS SODOM'

'Zedekiah was one and twenty years old when he began to reign, and he

reigned eleven years in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Hamutal

the daughter of Jeremiah of Libnah. 2. And he did that which was evil

in the eyes of the Lord, according to all that Jehoiakim had done. 3.

For through the anger of the Lord it came to pass in Jerusalem and

Judah, till he had cast them out from his presence, that Zedekiah

rebelled against the king of Babylon. 4. And it came to pass, in the

ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the

month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he and all his army,

against Jerusalem, and pitched against it, and built forts against it

round about. 5. So the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king

Zedekiah. 6. And in the fourth month, in the ninth day of the month,

the famine was sore in the city, so that there was no bread for the

people of the land. 7. Then the city was broken up, and all the men of

war fled, and went forth out of the city by night by the way of the

gate between the two walls, which was by the king's garden; (now the

Chaldeans were by the city round about) and they went by the way of the

plain. 8. But the army of the Chaldeans pursued after the king, and

overtook Zedekiah in the plains of Jericho; and all his army was

scattered from him. 9. Then they took the king, and carried him up unto

the king of Babylon to Riblah in the land of Hamath; where he gave

judgment upon him. 10. And the king of Babylon slew the sons of

Zedekiah before his eyes: he slew also all the princes of Judah in

Riblah. 11. Then he put out the eyes of Zedekiah; and the king of

Babylon bound him in chains, and carried him to Babylon, and put him in

prison till the day of his death.'--JER. lii. 1-11.

This account of the fall of Jerusalem is all but identical with that in

2 Kings xxv. It was probably taken thence by some editor of Jeremiah's

prophecies, perhaps Baruch, who felt the appropriateness of appending

to these the verification of them in that long-foretold and disbelieved

judgment.

The absence of every expression of emotion is most striking. In one

sentence the wrath of God is pointed to as the cause of all; and, for

the rest, the tragic facts which wrung the writer's heart are told in

brief, passionless sentences, which sound liker the voice of the

recording angel than that of a man who had lived through the misery

which he recounts. The Book of Lamentations weeps and sobs with the

grief of the devout Jew; but the historian smothers feeling while he

tells of God's righteous judgment.

Zedekiah owed his throne to 'the king of Babylon,' and, at first, was

his obedient vassal, himself going to Babylon (Jer. li. 59) and

swearing allegiance (Ezek. xvii. 13). But rebellion soon followed, and

the perjured young king once more pursued the fatal, fascinating policy

of alliance with Egypt. There could be but one end to that madness,

and, of course, the Chaldean forces soon appeared to chastise this

presumptuous little monarch, who dared to defy the master of the world.

Our narrative curtails its account of Zedekiah's reign, bringing into

strong relief only the two facts of his following Jehoiakim's evil

ways, and his rebellion against Babylon. But behind the rash, ignorant

young man, it sees God working, and traces all the insane bravado by

which he was ruining his kingdom and himself to God's 'wrath,' not

thereby diminishing Zedekiah's responsibility for his own acts, but

declaring that his being 'given over to a reprobate mind' was the

righteous divine punishment for past sin.

An eighteen months' agony is condensed into three verses (Jer. lii.

4-6), in which the minute care to specify dates pathetically reveals

the depth of the impression which the first appearance of the besieging

army made, and the deeper wound caused by the city's fall. The memory

of these days has not faded yet, for both are still kept as fasts by

the synagogue. We look with the narrator's eye at the deliberate

massing of the immense besieging force drawing its coils round the

doomed city, like a net round a deer, and mark with him the piling of

the mounds, and the erection on them of siege-towers. We hear of no

active siege operations till the final assault. Famine was

Nebuchadnezzar's best general. 'Sitting down they watched' _her_

'there,' and grimly waited till hunger became unbearable. We can fill

up much of the outline in this narrative from the rest of Jeremiah,

which gives us a vivid and wretched picture of imbecility, divided

counsels, and mad hatred of God's messenger, blind refusal to see

facts, and self-confidence which no disaster could abate. And, all the

while, the monstrous serpent was slowly tightening its folds round the

struggling, helpless rabbit. We have to imagine all the misery.

The narrative hurries on to its close. What widespread and

long-drawn-out privation that one sentence covers: 'The famine was sore

in the city, so that there was no bread for the people'! Lamentations

is full of the cries of famished children and mothers who eat the fruit

of their own bodies. At last, on the memorable black day, the ninth of

the fourth month (say July), 'a breach was made,' and the Chaldean

forces poured in through it. Jeremiah xxxix. 3 tells the names of the

Babylonian officers who 'sat in the middle gate' of the Temple,

polluting it with their presence. There seems to have been no

resistance from the enfeebled, famished people; but apparently some of

the priests were slain in the sanctuary, perhaps in the act of

defending it from the entrance of the enemy. The Chaldeans would enter

from the north, and, while they were establishing themselves in the

Temple, Zedekiah 'and all the men of war' fled, stealing out of the

city by a covered way between two walls, on the south side, and leaving

the city to the conqueror, without striking a blow. They had talked

large when danger was not near; but braggarts are cowards, and they

thought now of nothing but their own worthless lives. Then, as always,

the men who feared God feared nothing else, and the men who scoffed at

the day of retribution, when it was far off, were unmanned with terror

when it dawned.

The investment had not been complete on the southern side, and the

fugitives got away across Kedron and on to the road to Jericho, their

purpose, no doubt, being to put the Jordan between them and the enemy.

One can picture that stampede down the rocky way, the anxious looks

cast backwards, the confusion, the weariness, the despair when the rush

of the pursuers overtook the famine-weakened mob. In sight of Jericho,

which had witnessed the first onset of the irresistible desert-hardened

host under Joshua, the last king of Israel, deserted by his army, was

'taken in their pits,' as hunters take a wild beast. The march to

Riblah, in the far north, would be full of indignities arid of physical

suffering. The soldiers of that 'bitter and hasty' nation would not

spare him one insult or act of cruelty, and he had a tormentor within

worse than they. 'Why did I not listen to the prophet? What a fool I

have been! If I had only my time to come over again, how differently I

would do!' The miserable self-reproaches, which shoot their arrows into

our hearts when it is too late, would torture Zedekiah, as they will

sooner or later do to all who did not listen to God's message while

there was yet time. The sinful, mad past kept him company on one hand;

and, on the other, there attended him a dark, if doubtful, future. He

knew that he was at the disposal of a fierce conqueror, whom he had

deeply incensed, and who had little mercy. 'What will become of me when

I am face to face with Nebuchadnezzar? Would that I had kept subject to

him!' A past gone to ruin, a present honey-combed with gnawing remorse

and dread, a future threatening, problematical, but sure to be

penal--these were what this foolish young king had won by showing his

spirit and despising Jeremiah's warnings, It is always a mistake to fly

in the face of God's commands. All sin is folly, and every evildoer

might say with poor Robert Burns:

'I backward cast my e'e

On prospects drear!

An' forward, tho' I canna see,

I guess an' fear.'

Nebuchadnezzar was in Riblah, away up in the north, waiting the issue

of the campaign. Zedekiah was nothing to him but one of the many

rebellious vassals of whom he had to make an example lest rebellion

should spread, and who was especially guilty because he was

Nebuchadnezzar's own nominee, and had sworn allegiance. Policy and his

own natural disposition reinforced by custom dictated his barbarous

punishment meted to the unfortunate kinglet of the petty kingdom that

had dared to perk itself up against his might. How little he knew that

he was the executioner of God's decrees! How little the fact that he

was so, diminished his responsibility for his cruelty! The savage

practice of blinding captive kings, so as to make them harmless and

save all trouble with them, was very common. Zedekiah was carried to

Babylon, and thus was fulfilled Ezekiel's enigmatical prophecy, 'I will

bring him to Babylon,... yet shall he not see it, though he shall die

there' (Ezek. xii. 13).

The fall of Jerusalem should teach us that a nation is a moral whole,

capable of doing evil and of receiving retribution, and not a mere

aggregation of individuals. It should teach us that transgression does

still, though not so directly or certainly as in the case of Israel,

sap the strength of kingdoms; and that to-day, as truly as of old,

'righteousness exalteth a nation.' It should accustom us to look on

history as not only the result of visible forces, but as having behind

it, and reaching its end through the visible forces, the unseen hand of

God. For Christians, the vision of the Apocalypse contains the ultimate

word on 'the philosophy of history.' It is 'the Lamb before the

Throne,' who opens the roll with the seven seals, and lets the powers

of whom it speaks loose for their march through the world. It should

teach us God's long-suffering patience and loving efforts to escape the

necessity of smiting, and also God's rigid justice, which will not

shrink from smiting when all these efforts have failed.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: Isaiah and Jeremiah · 第 512 / 512 题