II. That contrast carries with it a rebuke.

Many voices echo the prophet's contrast nowadays. Our travelling

countrymen, especially those of them who have no great love for earnest

religion, are in the habit of drawing disparaging contrasts between

Buddhists, Brahmins, Mohammedans, any worshippers of other gods and

Christians. One may not uncharitably suspect that a more earnest

Christianity would not please these critics much better than does the

tepid sort, and that the pictures they draw both of heathenism and of

Christianity are coloured by their likes and dislikes. But it is well

to learn from an enemy, and caricatures may often be useful in calling

attention to features which would escape notice but for exaggeration.

So we may profit by even the ill-natured and distorted likenesses of

ourselves as contrasted with the adherents of other religions which so

many 'liberal-minded' writers of travels delight to supply.

Think, then, of the rebuke which the obstinate adherence of idolaters

to their idols gives to the slack hold which so many professing

Christians have on their religion.

Think of the way in which these lower religions pervade the whole life

of their worshippers, and of how partial is the sway over a little

territory of life and conduct which Christianity has in many of its

adherents. The absorption in worship shown by Mohammedans, who will

spread their prayer carpets anywhere and perform their drill of prayers

without embarrassment or distraction in the sight of a crowd, or the

rapt 'devotion' of fakirs, are held up as a rebuke to us 'Christians'

who are ashamed to be caught praying. One may observe, in mitigation,

that the worship which is of the heart is naturally more sensitive to

surrounding distractions than that which is a matter of posturing and

repetition by rote. But there still remains substance enough in the

contrast to point a sharp arrow of rebuke.

And there is no denying that in these 'heathen' religions, religion is

intertwined with every act of life in a fashion which may well put to

shame many of us. Remember how Paul had to deal at length with the duty

of the Corinthians in view of the way in which every meal was a

sacrifice to some god, and how the same permeation of life with

religion is found in all these 'false faiths.' The octopus has coiled

its tentacles round the whole body of its victim. Bad and sad and mad

as idolatry is, it reads a rebuke to many of us, who keep life and

religion quite apart, and lock up our Christianity in our pews with our

prayer-books and hymnaries.

Think of the material sacrifices made by idolaters, in costly

offerings, in painful self-tortures, and in many other ways, and the

niggardliness and self-indulgence of so many so-called Christians.

III. The contrast suggests the greatness of the power which can

overcome even such obstinate adherence to idols.

There is one, and only one, solvent for that rock-like obstinacy--the

Gospel. The other religions have seldom attempted to encroach on each

other's territory, and where they have, their instrument of conversion

has generally been the sword. The Gospel has met and mastered them all.

It, and it only, has had power to draw men to itself out of every

faith. The ancient gods who bewitched Israel, the gods of Greece, the

gods of our own ancestors, the gods of the islands of the South Seas,

lie huddled together, in undistinguished heaps, like corpses on a

battlefield, and the deities of India and the East are wounded and

slowly bleeding out their lives. 'Bel boweth down, Nebo stoopeth, the

idols are upon the beasts,' all packed up, as it were, and ready to be

carried off.

The rate of progress in dethroning them varies with the varying

national conditions. It is easier to cut a tunnel through chalk than

through quartz.

IV. That contrast carries with it a call for Christian effort to spread

the conquering Gospel.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: Isaiah and Jeremiah · 第 429 / 512 题