With the prospect of reaching university students I traveled to

Cambridge. In the midst of the weathered spires, the ivied halls, and

the storied dignity of Trinity and Kings, Noel Porter and his wife,

Bevan, had converted an old public house, The Half Moon, into a home,

yet had managed to keep its original atmosphere of convivial

hospitality. The tap-room had once opened directly on Little St. Mary’s

Lane; now the bar had been removed, but the ancient sign still swung

back and forth and the smoky ceilings and mildewed paneling were the

same as when former generations had congregated there over mugs of ale.

Opposite was a tiny, old-fashioned graveyard, no longer used, and I went

out there and let the sun beat against my aching back. It was amusing to

have to resort to a cemetery for privacy, but the house was constantly

filled with hatless students coming and going through the enormous

downstairs room which served as rendezvous for all. In the afternoons

these youths on the threshold of manhood came to talk over the questions

which were perplexing them; in the evenings they had little meetings, at

one of which I spoke.

Guy Aldred, who was in Scotland, had planned my schedule there, and I

had three weeks of a Scottish summer—bluebells so thick in spots that

the ground was azure, long twilights when the lavender heather faded the

hills into purple.

When I had been in Glasgow before, I had encountered only officials, but

on this occasion I met the people in their homes and found them quite

opposite to the stingy, tight-fisted, middle-class stereotype. They were

hospitable, generous, mentally alert, just as witty as the Irish and in

much the same way, which rather surprised me.

Fourth of July, Sunday, we had a noon meeting on the Glasgow Green.

Nearly two thousand shipyard workers in caps and baggy corduroys stood

close together listening in utter, dead stillness without cough or

whisper. That evening I spoke in a hall under Socialist auspices, Guy

Aldred acting as chairman. One old-timer said he had been a party member

for eleven years, attending Sunday night lectures regularly, but never

before had he been able to induce his wife to come; tonight he could not

keep her home. “Look!” he cried in amazement. “The women have crowded

the men out of this hall. I never saw so many wives of comrades before.”

The men were there, partly through curiosity to hear the American and

partly through interest in the subject, ready to fight the ancient

battle of Marx against Malthus. Efforts of the English Neo-Malthusians

to introduce birth control to the masses had been hampered not only by

the opposition of the upper classes, but more especially by the

persistent hostility of the orthodox Socialists.

Marx, dealing with problems after they had arisen, had taught that any

reform likely to dull the edge of poverty was bad for Socialism because

it made labor less dissatisfied. It followed that if a man had to fight

for the hungers and necessities of ten or twelve children, he made a

better revolutionary. “Let ’em have as many as they can,” was the cry.

On the other hand, if birth control were practiced by the working

classes, the wage earner who could support two children and knew how not

to have more was going to be content and would not struggle against

conditions of economic insecurity. Hence he was likely to forget “the

Revolution.”

Knowing that the Scotch took mental notes of items on which to debate, I

had tried to prepare myself well, and I produced the unanswerable

argument to this theory. “Why do you demand higher wages then,” I asked,

“when what you really want is privation? If misery is your weapon you

should not insist on an eight-hour day but on a twelve- or fourteen-hour

one. You should pile up your grievances, and pile them up higher.

However, in spite of your best efforts I believe your hunger-revolution

will, as it has always done, capitulate to whatever force or government

will fill your stomachs.”

Socialists, like anarchists and syndicalists, were used to contesting

Malthusianism on economic grounds, but, unlike the others, they had as a

part of their platform the freedom of woman. I pointed out that she

could have the sort of freedom they desired for her right here and now

through birth control.

When I ended, Guy Aldred asked, “Now are there any questions?” After a

few somewhat irrelevant ones, silence fell; confronted by their own

philosophy they could see it. One man finally rose, “We’d like to hear

what the Chairman thinks of all this. Does he believe birth control will

do what the lady speaker claims for it?” Apparently they were waiting

for their cue. But Guy Aldred was not to be drawn. After giving him an

opportunity to express himself they plunged in and said their say. Even

some women who had never been on their feet before got up to tell

dramatic, vivid, personal stories.

The next day I was on my way to a town not far from Dunfermline, Andrew

Carnegie’s birthplace. I arrived about four o’clock in a driving storm,

lacking both umbrella and raincoat. No taxi had ever graced the railroad

station, and we trudged through the rain to the cottage of one of the

“most advanced friends of labor.” I was soaking wet up to the knees. A

hurry-call was sent to neighbors for dry clothing, but among that

population of five thousand not a single woman had an extra skirt to

lend, and only after long search was a new pair of Sunday shoes

forthcoming.

Because there was not an inn within miles, I slept that night with my

hostess in the one bed the house contained; the husband stretched

himself out on two chairs in the kitchen. Since Sylvia Pankhurst had

been similarly accommodated just a few months before, I knew I was

having the best the village afforded.

The inhabitants had been dispatched from Lancashire factory towns during

the War for special munitions work, and here they had stayed and made

their homes. Practically all had been apprenticed to the mills at the

age of eight or nine. Girls, because they were destined for marriage and

therefore needed no education, had worked ten or twelve hours a day

throughout their adolescence, and even after their weddings up to the

time pregnancy was well advanced. As a result, the young mothers, who

had never, from childhood to maturity, had a chance to become rested and

get the fatigue out of their systems, had apparently transmitted their

weariness to their children; the firstborn were sleepy, inert, and

always tired. A doctor told me it was common for boys and girls of five,

six, and seven to fall asleep at their school desks and have to be

awakened.

When I had arrived in England I had gone to see Havelock in the quaint

old Cornwall village where he was living alone since Edith’s death.

Winding pathways, well-trodden and embraced on either side by rambling

shrubbery and verbena, led from his house to the sea hundreds of feet

below. The waves dashed continuously against the crags and rocks, and

thousands of gulls shrieked or sailed majestically almost in front of my

eyes.

We had then talked about going to Ireland where I could make a foray

into my own genealogy. Mother’s ancestors at some stage had been the

same as Edward Fitzgerald’s and I thought I might find some of the

places from which they had sprung. I had no exact information—just

tradition from childhood days. Now, after my strenuous lecturing, I

needed a brief holiday, and Havelock also wanted a vacation; so we

joined forces.

My primary purpose was frustrated because after half a century nobody in

any of the little villages seemed to know anything definite. At

Glengariff they said, “Sure, and I thought it was Killarney your

grandfather was born in.” But at Killarney I was told, “Oh, it was Cork

your family came from. My grandmother knew them very well.”

More difficult to surmount than the vague discursiveness of these good

people was the Sinn Fein Rebellion, in the thick of which we found

ourselves. The night before we reached Cork there had been a raid and

the leaders were in hiding. Everywhere we went we could sense a subtle,

surreptitious undercurrent—in the hotels, in the restaurants, among

small, whispering groups which dispersed when any stranger approached.

Ireland had great natural beauty, and I was sorry to see the beginnings

of ugly, modern industrialism cropping up, especially in Cork with the

Ford factory. The mustard-colored kilts of the men astonished me; I had

never known the Irish wore them, but they were trying to bring back

their ancestral dress along with the Gaelic language. Always their

kindness and interest and the sadness in their voices moved me deeply.

They were never too sad, however, to give a quick turn to a phrase. One

morning the tram in which we were riding suddenly stopped. Nobody knew

why; everybody was complaining. Then from a side street came a handful

of Black and Tans with bayonets fixed. I asked the Irishman sitting

beside me, “What does that mean?”

“You should know,” he replied. “Those are Wilson’s Fourteen Pints.”

Havelock was a delightful companion, not loquacious, but keenly

interested in everything, and forever jotting down his copious notes. We

hired a two-wheeled jaunting car in which we sat back to back, and in

this way bumped from Glengariff to Killarney. Occasionally the sun broke

through for half an hour, but it was wet that year—potatoes and hay were

rotting on the ground because the sun did not shine long enough to dry

them.

We arrived at the inn, drenched and sopping. Havelock, with his

typically English dread of a cold, went to bed, but I stayed up talking

with a young woman and three equally young traveling priests—Sinn

Feiners all. We chatted desultorily until I happened to mention I had a

letter to the widow of the hero, Skeffington, who had been killed in the

disturbances.

The company, assuming me to be one with their cause, immediately became

most friendly. The girl began discussing higher education for her sex. I

asked her how she could keep on when she married and had the inevitable

succession of offspring. The priests, somewhat to my surprise, fell in

with my ideas by deploring too large families; some of the older sons

and daughters had to emigrate, and even those who were left could not

care adequately for their parents. It would be better for the Catholic

Church as well as for the world if they could help people to have only a

few children and bring them up decently. I felt hopeful because they

were speaking of birth control as solving some of their own problems;

they were saying exactly what I most wanted them to say.

Several happy days we spent at Killarney, exploring on foot, on

horseback, and in boats. The men who drove the cart or rowed us through

the lakes always knew the old myths of the mountains and poured into our

ears tales of leprechauns and other “little people.” You heard the word

“divil” more than any other. Here the divil, so they told us, had left

his step, there he had run away. The shape of every mountain, the twist

of every stream had their stories.

Wherever we went women, lean and elderly, wearing tiny shoulder shawls

and calico print dresses, fairly started out of the hillsides,

bareheaded, barefooted, complexions like roses, and eyes as blue as the

sky. Yet their faces were hungry and worn. Getting on in years as they

were, they could and did run faster than our ponies. When we spurred

forward they came right along, flattering, cajoling, uttering prayers

and “God bless you’s,” calling on all the saints to preserve you if you

would buy a drop of “Mountain Dew,” which was so good for your health.

If you bought this Irish whiskey from one, another took her place, and,

quite undiscouraged, began again the flow of sales talk.

One of our last days, when the wraiths of the lake dimmed the emerald

hills, we walked to red-bricked Killarney House, to which, as Havelock

said, nature was adding her own wild beauty to the beauty that man had

made.

All of Ireland had seemed draped in mist and sadness and, lovely as it

had been, I never wanted to go back.

_Chapter Twenty-two_

DO YE HEAR THE CHILDREN WEEPING?

After the Irish interlude I was ready to go on to Germany to carry out

the most important objective of my journey abroad. It had become obvious

that progress depended on finding a means of contraception, cheap,

harmless, easily applied. Way back in 1914 Havelock had seen in some of

the last medical journals to come out of Germany an advertisement of a

chemical contraceptive. He had mentioned it to me, and ever since I had

been eager to track it down. In pre-War Germany every advertised product

had been required to live up to the claims made for it; the public must

not be misled. Thus I was convinced that if the notice had stated it was

to prevent conception, the assertion was true. No news of it had come

since the War, and I wished to ascertain whether it was still being

manufactured. Perhaps this formula would be the solution to our problem.

I had a secondary reason also for going to Germany—to investigate the

decline in the birth rate. It was said half the married women had become

barren during the blockade for lack of proper food. I was always looking

for evidence to support and strengthen our arguments, and, consequently,

wanted to discover what had been learned of the relation between

vitamins and fertility.

Berlin was cold and dark when Rose Witcop and I, about eleven at night,

arrived at Neuköln, a special proletarian section of the city. The train

was late, an unusual state of things in efficient Germany, but this was

the period of her greatest disorganization. The telegram which had been

sent to Rose’s sister and brother-in-law, Milly and Rudolph Rocker, had

apparently not been delivered; nobody met us. There were no taxis, no

carriages, no lamps, no lights in the windows to relieve the pitch

blackness. A sleepy, disgruntled porter led us across the street to an

insignificant hotel. He knocked at the door; a head popped out of a

window above. “Two ladies want to stay overnight.” The proprietress said

she could give us nothing to eat, but that we could have a room. We

accepted gladly, climbed up a ladder into the same bed, piled high with

feathered mattresses above and below us, and settled ourselves to

comforting sleep after the long and tiresome journey.

In the morning, refreshed, we took a tram to the Rockers’ small

apartment. Rudolph was a syndicalist, a friend of Portet, and had been

interned in a concentration camp near London during the War. Both Milly

and Rudolph had suffered great privations after their return. But,

although food was very scarce, they were more than prodigal and kind in

sharing with us.

Germany was still no place for casual visitors in 1920. She seemed dead,

crushed, broken. Street traffic, even in a metropolis the size of

Berlin, was slight. I noted particularly the grim silence everywhere;

people had forgotten how to smile. They were thankful for the

Revolution, but it had not brought much relief, and the winter to come

was dreaded. Instead of displaying food or clothing, the windows of shop

after shop on street after street were decorated only with streamers of

colored paper.

Everybody was ravenous for fresh vegetables; money meant nothing, food

everything. I saw old peasant women coming in from the country with bags

of potatoes on their backs. Fifteen minutes after emptying them on to

pushcarts they were sold out. The only fruit to be had were plums, and

that is how I remember it was late summer in Berlin; it is curious how

such memories crop up.

Ordinarily I could go without eating if I had plenty of water, but in

Berlin I found myself haunting grocery stores like a hungry animal,

examining each new article avariciously. I cannot as a rule bear tinned

milk and will not give it to babies, yet here when I saw a can of

American evaporated milk, I found myself viewing it with glowing eyes. I

was disgusted with myself. Nothing satisfied my appetite except eggs,

and these, along with milk, could be purchased only on prescription from

a doctor. Meat was reduced to half a pound a week for each person, but I

had no ration card. A neighbor of the Rockers obtained some bread for me

and gave me her potatoes although she and her three lovely daughters had

only rice as a substitute. I was in tears over her generosity.

For months many families had existed on nothing but turnips. They ate

turnip soup, turnips raw, turnips mashed, turnip salad, turnip coffee,

until their whole systems revolted physically against the sight of

turnips. The contact with other persons in trams, halls, churches, even

streets, was nauseating; in a few minutes the fumes of turnip from their

bodies was so offensive that they became almost unendurable to

themselves.

I went into a two-room home, clean but overflowing with ten children,

five born since the War, starvation horribly stamped on their faces. The

oldest was twelve—still too young to work. The father, a locksmith, had

no job. All were living on a hundred marks received every week from

Government Unemployment Insurance. It was now Saturday, and not one

crumb or morsel remained to tide them over until the next payment on

Monday. They had eaten no breakfast, no dinner, and the father had gone

to the woods to search for mushrooms to keep them alive.

Even men who had employment were working only three days a week,

averaging a hundred and fifty marks for a family, and marks were fifty

to the American dollar. The best food had to be given to them because

they were the earners. Women were the real sufferers; they had to go

without or subsist on what they could scrape together. They nursed their

babies beyond two years to supply milk, and all their time was occupied

in a constant hunt to find nourishment for the older ones.

I heard countless stories from mothers who had been tortured by watching

their children slowly starve to death—pinched faces growing paler, eyes

more listless, heads drooping lower day by day until finally they did

not even ask for food. You saw a tiny thing playing on the street

suddenly run to a tree or fence and lean against it while he coughed and

had a hemorrhage. Others like him were dying of tuberculosis from lack

of eggs, butter, and milk—so many cows had been sent to France. Yet they

came up to me and offered to sell their prescriptions thinking that I,

as a foreigner, had money to buy them; they themselves had none for

these luxuries.

The old-fashioned warrior who entered with the sword and killed his

victims outright had my respect after witnessing the “peace conditions”

of Germany.

The Quaker food stations admitted only children who were ill and only

mothers who were more than seven months pregnant or who were nursing

babies less than four months old. The spectacle of one of these women

bringing two or three of her brood, not sick enough to be regularly fed,

to share her own soup was too sad and overwhelming to bear. Those in

charge of the distribution wanted each mother herself to eat for the

benefit of her unborn child or nursing infant, and were already crowded

to capacity, feeding three and four hundred at a time on cocoa and rolls

made from white flour. But they could not bring themselves to exclude

the little scarecrows with large, starry eyes, pipestem legs, and hands

from which the flesh had fallen until they were like claws. On one of my

visits the “sister” had them stand up and then asked, “Where have you

been?”

“To America,” they chorused.

“What have you to say?”

“We love America. We thank America.”

I did not instantly comprehend, but it was explained to me that they

called the station _Amerika_ in token of their gratitude.

To account for the sorry state in which they found themselves the

Germans were groping to fix the blame either within their country or on

some foreign power. All seemed of the opinion that had the United States

not entered the War, none would have been victor and none vanquished;

this, they said, would have meant a lasting peace. Yet they felt little

animosity towards us. What there was had been largely wiped out by the

aid of the Hoover Commission. Furthermore, they still hoped we might be

an influence in loosening the Treaty chains which kept them helpless and

bound. When I asked them why they had accepted the humiliating terms at

Versailles of which they complained so bitterly, they replied they had

been told that, had they not done so, vast territories which supposedly

had been mined would have been blown up and huge populations would have

been annihilated.

The military party accused the Socialists of having stabbed them in the

back and brought about defeat through the leadership of such pacifists

as Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg, who had paid with their lives;

the Socialists and workers regretted they had not united with Russia

and, combining their own scientific and technical knowledge with her raw

materials, conquered the world and thus molded all civilization to their

ideals.

Both classes sincerely believed that France wanted to destroy them

utterly. I saw something of the reason for their feeling one day when a

tram stopped to let off passengers, and a French automobile filled with

French officers, instead of halting the prescribed number of feet away,

plowed right through, knocking down two people and never even pausing to

see what havoc it had created. The spectators gazed at the bodies lying

there waiting for the ambulance. They did not dare shake their fists,

but anyone could tell from the pitch of their voices, their expressions

of passion and anger, how bitter was their resentment.

The women broke down all the reserves of my emotion. They had been at

one time the most advanced in Europe, politically, economically, and

socially, and, although they had had to work harder at the gymnasiums

than the men because higher marks had been required of them, they had

been really on a par. But now a frightful retrogression had occurred.

Working women had been forced down to a state beside the lower animals;

they had become drudges in the fields in place of draft horses. I saw

one who could not have been past twenty-five carrying a huge basket of

vegetables strapped to her back, the weight of which threw her forward

so that I expected any minute to see her go on all fours.

An impressive and tragic poster by Käthe Kollwitz was displayed on

various corners. It showed a woman with head thrown back, eyes closed,

arms crossed over breast, and was captioned simply, “Waiting.” The human

figures you saw on the streets looked out of eyes dried by suffering and

deepened by hunger. They had no faith, no hope, no philosophy; they were

resigned to love or hatred, peace or war, a living death or a sudden

end.

Throughout Europe, governments were clamoring for bigger populations;

France was offering bonuses for large families. “Our babies are dying;

give us more babies.” Among European labor groups only the syndicalists

of France had recognized excessive population as detrimental to the

working classes.

The deficiency in Germany of two million lives sacrificed in the War had

been made up by the thousands returned from Alsace-Lorraine, from the

former province of Posen, and the deportees from England, France, and

Italy. There were not nearly enough positions to go round. Yet the

nationalists, who had tried to cover the bitter pill of imperialistic

ambitions with a sugar-coating of patriotism, still estimated the world

in terms of numerical greatness and women as mere machines in the cradle

competition of human production. Even the German Socialists, following

in the footsteps of Marx, opposed Malthusianism vigorously in and out of

season.

Margaret Sanger: an autobiography. · 第 23 / 43 段