The three great emunctories, the skin, the bowels, and the kidneys, are

chiefly appealed to for relief in this as in other serous

accumulations. Most physicians prefer to use the diuretics--first,

because if they will act at all, they act so quietly and produce so

little debility that whatever can be gained by them is obtained at

small cost to the system. The form of ascites that most resists

diuretics is that which originates in cirrhosis. Often a full trial of

them, with suitable changes from time to time, is of no avail, yet now

and then the kidneys yield to persuasion and act freely. The saline

diuretics and digitalis are most in favor with some. In the early part

of the present century a pill composed of squill and digitalis in

powder, and calomel, each one grain, given three times a day, was

almost universally chosen. In place of the calomel the blue mass was

often preferred. When this prescription had produced a little ptyalism

the mercurial was omitted and the squill and digitalis continued. It

has often been observed in dropsies of all kinds that diuretics act

better after a little mercurial action is set up in the system. The

diuretic that I most frequently prescribe is made of the carbonate of

potass. ounce ss and water ounce vj; to a tablespoonful of this a

tablespoonful of fresh lemon-juice is added. This is taken every two

hours, and at the same time a dessertspoonful of the infusion of

digitalis or more is taken three times a day. This is an {1179} old

prescription. Sometimes the old sal diureticus is used. This is the

acetate of potassium. It is not always kindly received by the stomach.

At Bellevue Hospital the following is much used: viz. infusion of

digitalis, ounce iv; bitartrate of potash, ounce j; simple syrup, ounce

ss; and water added to make a pint. This is taken pretty freely. But it

would require many pages to exhaust the diuretics. I will only add that

I have more confidence in the salts of potash and soda, singly or

combined, aided by digitalis and a mercurial, than in any others.

The diaphoretics that are most efficient are warm water and steam. A

foot-bath long continued and frequently repeated, the patient covered

with blankets, and the water kept at 90° or warmer, are very effectual

in producing perspiration. Bricks heated or hot water in bottles, or

potatoes heated, and enveloped in damp cloths and laid alongside of the

body and limbs, form an extemporaneous vapor-bath of considerable

efficiency. A vapor-bath can be easily extemporized in the following

way: Have a kitchen vessel furnished by the tinman with a cover which

has an inch tube fitted to this and bent so as reach the floor six feet

from the fire. The pot should have a capacity of a gallon or more, and

should be kept boiling briskly. Meantime, the patient, in his

night-dress, has a double blanket brought over his shoulders from

behind, and another from before, and fastened. Now he takes a chair

(wooden), under which the steam is delivered. The blanket from behind

is kept off his body by the back of the chair, and the front one by his

knees. The steam, shut in in this way, soon brings on a sweat, and when

it is sufficiently active the front blanket is thrown off, and the

patient wrapped in the rear one and put to bed, when the sweating can

be regulated by blankets. This is better than what is called the

alcohol sweat, for in that the patient is bathed in carbonic acid gas

as well as heat. A patient is sometimes enveloped in a hot, wet blanket

with good effect. Pilocarpine has come into use lately as a sudorific.

I have witnessed its effects many times and can testify to its

certainty as a sudorific; but it is too debilitating for common use.

Digitalis has sometimes acted with extraordinary power in this way, but

there are grave risks in administering large doses.

Among the cathartics that may be used in ascites, it has seemed to me

that the milder hydragogues are safest. One ounce of Epsom salts with a

drachm of the fluid extract of senna can be taken every second or third

day for months, if need be, with little reduction of strength, and

sometimes with an increase of it. I had charge of a young man in the

hospital in whom cirrhosis was unquestionable, and dropsy at one time

extreme, in whom the abdominal veins had made furrows that would

receive the little finger, who was wholly relieved by a drastic dose of

elaterium every second day. I saw him three years after his discharge,

and then his health was good. Notwithstanding this, I prefer the milder

medicines.

Bristowe has seen no cures from either sudorifics, diuretics, or

purgatives. I have seen one or more from each of those agents, all

cirrhotic. He "has seen cures occasionally from mercury, iodide and

bromide of potash, copaiba, and a combination of fresh squills and

crude mercury." I agree with him in his statement that

counter-irritants are useless, making exception for chronic peritonitis

and the early stage of the tubercular variety. He thinks quinia, iron,

and cod-liver oil are useful.

{1180} Paracentesis in almost every case will at length become

necessary, and the question comes whether it should be practised early

or late. If it be delayed till the oppression of the breathing makes it

imperative, the walls of the abdomen will be so stretched as to present

little resistance to the reaccumulation of the fluid, and a second

tapping will be required in fifteen to twenty-five days. A bandage is a

poor substitute for muscular contraction. If, on the other hand, the

fluid is withdrawn before the muscularity is not stretched out of the

muscles, then accumulation will be less rapid and the patient will be

spared the suffering which large accumulations cause. But tapping is

not always an innocent operation. It is sometimes followed by acute

peritonitis. By the early tapping this risk is oftener taken. Reginald

Smith suggests the use of a small canula by which only ten or twenty

ounces of the fluid can escape each hour. This mode, he thinks, removes

the danger of syncope and makes the bandage needless.

Hemorrhagic Effusion

in the peritoneum is a topic on which there is little to be said. A

primary effusion of this kind probably does not occur. In hæmatophilia,

where the mucous membrane of the nose and wounds bleed dangerously,

there is no record of spontaneous bleeding into the peritoneal cavity.

The same thing can be said of that very rare disease which has been

called bloody sweat. An unmarried lady applied to me fifteen years ago

with this disorder. The blood would ooze out at hundreds of points on

the inner face of the arm; these would run together and drop off the

arm, or the same thing would occur on the chest and in the bend of the

knee. This would continue for two or three minutes, and then cease of

itself, but to recur in one or more, rarely several, places. For years

this habit continued. There was no irregularity of the menses. I could

find no visceral disease; there was no nose-bleed. She lost strength,

but only moderately. This kind of bleeding continued for several years.

She is now approaching fifty years of age, and for the last two or

three years has had no recurrence of the bleeding. There was never

anything in this case to lead to the suspicion of peritoneal or other

serous hemorrhage. In the few similar cases on record there is the same

absence of all evidence of internal bleeding.

It has already been said that a certain amount of blood, as shown by

its corpuscles, is to be expected in cancerous ascites, and with less

uniformity in tubercular ascites, and not unfrequently in hepatic

dropsy, as well as in acute peritonitis. This may not deserve to be

called hemorrhage, on account of the moderate quantity of blood that is

effused; but aside from that which results from rupture of

blood-vessels it is about the only kind of it with which we are

familiar.

Scurvy, and conditions of the blood analogous to those produced by that

disease, make it almost certain that if pleurisy or pericarditis occurs

while these conditions exist, it will be hemorrhagic. I am not,

personally, acquainted with a single instance in which peritonitis in

this condition has occurred. Copeland, however, says that hemorrhage in

peritonitis has been noticed by Broussais and others. The blood is

mixed {1181} with the serum and stains the surface of the false

membrane, as in hemorrhagic pleurisy and pericarditis, and the disease

is of an asthenic type, "occurring in the hemorrhagic diathesis." "The

symptoms are inflammatory from the beginning, and rapidly pass into

those indicating great depression; the pulse becomes rapid, small, and

soft, death quickly supervening, with convulsions, cold and damp

extremities and surface," etc.

Copeland has himself not seen a case, and regards its occurrence as

very rare. Delafield states that "Friedreich describes two cases

occurring in patients with ascites who had been frequently tapped. He

says that both the parietal and visceral peritoneum was covered with a

continuous membrane of a diffuse, yellowish-brown color, mottled with

small and large extravasations of blood. The membrane was thickest over

the anterior abdominal wall. It could be separated into a number of

layers. These layers were composed of blood-vessels, masses of pigment,

branching cells, and fibrillated basement substance. In many places the

extravasated blood was coagulated in the shape of round, hard, black

nodules. The new membrane could be readily stripped off from the

peritoneum, and there were no adhesions between the visceral and

parietal portions of the peritoneum."

The erosions of abdominal cancer sometimes open vessels of considerable

size, causing large hemorrhage into this cavity and sudden death.

When aneurisms of the abdominal aorta rupture, they sometimes flood the

abdominal cavity; oftener they open into the structures under the

peritoneum on the left side, and make a large flat tumor extending from

the point of rupture downward to the brim of the pelvis, and even

beyond it.

A gentleman whose health was usually good, thirty-five years of age,

felt an unwonted exhaustion and feebleness creeping over him. His

countenance became pale, his pulse rapid, growing smaller and smaller.

It seemed certain that there was hemorrhage somewhere, but until it was

noticed that the bowels were growing tumid and hard there was nothing

to guide us to its seat. Even then we were left to conjecture regarding

the bleeding vessel. This sinking continued for thirty-six hours. After

death it was found that a small aneurism had been formed on one of the

vessels of the omentum, not larger than a small walnut, and had

ruptured by a very small opening, and that it was by this small opening

that life had oozed away.

Bleedings from stabs and other wounds of the bowels, from lacerations

of the liver, spleen, uterus, and sometimes of the kidneys, should be

mentioned in this connection; but as they, for the most part, fall into

the hands of the surgeons, this is not the place to give the details

regarding them.

{1182}

DISEASES OF THE ABDOMINAL GLANDS (TABES MESENTERICA).

BY SAMUEL C. BUSEY, M.D.

DEFINITION.--Tabes mesenterica may be briefly defined to be

tuberculosis of the mesenteric glands. This definition may seem too

limited, because it recognizes the identity of tuberculosis and

scrofulosis of the lymph-glands, and excludes those hyperplastic

conditions which do not certainly undergo the cheesy degeneration. It

is supported, however, by the absence of any essential difference in

the histological changes which take place in tuberculous and scrofulous

(Wagner) lymph-glands; by the frequent simultaneous occurrence of each

in the same subject; by the secondary development of tubercles during

the course of scrofulous affections; and by the fact that the cheesy

transformation is alike common to both these conditions of new

formations. Schüppel maintains that the presence of tubercles is

necessary to the production of the cheesy metamorphosis of

lymph-glands, and that "scrofulous glands are always tuberculous

glands." In this view Rindfleisch coincides, and expresses the belief

that the inflammatory and hyperplastic changes are secondary to the

formation of the tubercles. Birch-Hirschfeld asserts that cheesy

degeneration of the mesenteric glands is always accompanied by

tubercular formations.

This definition is therefore adopted as the expression of the result of

the most recent investigations. It must, nevertheless, be admitted that

a few equally competent observers deny the identity of the tuberculous

and scrofulous new formations in lymph-glands. It must also be conceded

that occasionally hyperplastic processes in the lymph-glands undergo

the cheesy metamorphosis independent of tubercular development.

SYNONYMS.--The differences of opinion, especially among the older

authors, in regard to the nature of this disease are very distinctly

indicated in the varying significance of the numerous synonyms, of

which the following list is only a part: Atrophia mesenterica; Atrophia

infantum (Hoffmann); Febris hectica infantum (Sydenham); Scrofula

mesenterica (Sauvages); Paralysma mesentericum (Good); Physconia

mesenterica (Baumes); Mesenteritis chronica (Stewart); Mesenteric

fever, Hectic fever, Marasmus (Underwood); Carreau, Entero-mésentérite

of the French; Darrsucht der Kinder and Gekröschwindsucht of the

Germans; Tubercles of the mesentery; Tuberculous disease of the

abdomen; Phthisis mesenterica; Tabes glandularis; Tabes scrofulosa;

Macies infantum; Pædatrophia; and Rachialgia mesenterica.

{1183} Some of these synonyms indicate the theoretical and unsupported

opinions of their authors, and others refer merely to a symptom. The

name carreau refers to a hardness of the abdomen; physconia, to the

presence of a non-fluctuating and non-sonorous abdominal tumor; and

that of entero-mésentérite presupposes a secondary origin from a

primary enteritis. Good classes it among his numerous varieties of

mesenteric turgescence, but characterizes this special form as a

scrofulous turgescence always associated with the strumous diathesis.

The terms tabes and atrophy originated when the nomenclature of disease

was derived from symptoms, and not from pathology.

HISTORY AND PATHOLOGY.--The history of tabes mesenterica is coeval with

that of scrofula and pulmonary consumption. The ancient authors

recognized the existence of a chronic disease of the mesenteric glands,

characterized by enlargement and induration, followed by destruction of

the gland-parenchyma, which was associated with digestive disturbances,

emaciation, hectic fever, and usually terminated in death. At first,

the degenerative process was regarded as suppurative. But as the study

of scrofula progressed, and frequent observations were made of the

occurrence of disease of the external lymphatics and of the mesenteric

glands in the same subject, disputes arose as to the identity of the

two affections. These controversies led to the general acceptance of

the belief that the scrofulous degeneration of lymph-glands and the

process of destruction in tabes mesenterica were identical.

Consentaneous with these investigations, and for a long time

subsequent, even down to a very late period, which is, perhaps, not yet

concluded, the relation of scrofulous disease of the lymph-glands to

pulmonary consumption was discussed and studied with great assiduity.

As the knowledge concerning these diseases advanced, and the results of

investigations were accepted, the doctrine of the identity of the

morbid processes in scrofulous disease of the external glands and

mesenteric phthisis became firmly established. The history of

scrofulosis and tuberculosis cannot be separated. The connection and

identification of the two processes have been subjects of constant

discussion from the discovery of tubercle to the present time.

Occasionally, the dividing-line seemed definitely fixed. Then would

follow the general acceptance of the doctrine of identity. With the

discovery of miliary tubercle a determined reaction took place against

this view, and for a while many regarded scrofulosis merely as a form

or stage of tuberculosis. As the conclusions in regard to these

questions changed, so did the opinions concerning the true nature of

tabes mesenterica change, until, finally, the investigations of

Rindfleisch, Schüppel, and others seem to have established the

tuberculous nature of the disease. Many authors of a comparatively

recent date have applied the term tuberculosis to this condition, not

because they knew or believed the development of true tubercle was a

constant or essential characteristic, but because they regarded the

words scrofulosis and tuberculosis as synonymous.

Notwithstanding the obscurity in which, for so long a time, the

pathology of this disease was involved, certain facts well known to the

earliest writers have been confirmed by continuous observation down to

the present. Its secondary character has been so uniformly recognized

that some of the older authors based its origin upon the absorption and

conveyance along the lymphatic vessels to the glands of some peccant

material originating {1184} in a primary focus of disease. The constant

coexistence with scrofulous affections and pulmonary consumption had

long ago established the direct and primary relation of these diseases

to tabes mesenterica, and authors of recent date, though not so

generally holding the opinion that it is always an intercurrent

complication of these maladies, yet maintain its secondary development.

Even Schüppel, whose investigations and conclusions lead in the

direction of an idiopathic origin, admits that the only primary element

is the tuberculosis, which finds its cause in some peripheral

irritation.

In the earlier times, as now, tuberculosis of the mesenteric glands has

been observed during every period of life from birth to advanced old

age, but then, as at the present time, the greater number of cases were

known to occur during infancy and childhood. But few cases have been

observed during the earlier months of life or before weaning. Between

the ages of two and eight years is the period of greatest frequency.

Though rarer during the later years of childhood, the older the child

the more rapid its progress to a fatal termination. Nursing infants are

not exempt, but those nursed by healthy mothers are much less liable

than the wet-nursed. Among hand-fed infants it is not an uncommon

disease, but it is much more common among the farmed-out children.

While, as has been stated, the greatest number of cases occur in those

between two and eight years of age, statistics show that the liability

to it increases from the age of two and a half years up to the eighth,

and, according to some authors, up to the tenth year. At the latter age

there is a remarkable diminution in the number of cases. This fact is

probably due to the greater prevalence of the acute diseases of the

respiratory organs and of the exanthematous diseases among children

during this period of life. Some have attributed it to the more rapid

development and increased functional activity of the mesenteric glands.

This circumstance might afford a plausible explanation for the apparent

sudden increase in frequency after the completion of the second year

because of the independent subsistence of children at that age, and the

additional duties imposed upon the alimentary tract and its

dependencies; still, if this were so, the period of greatest frequency

ought to begin at an earlier age and more nearly correspond with the

time of weaning. It is, however, a fact that tubercularization of the

mesenteric glands is more frequently associated with chronic intestinal

inflammation in those over one year than in those under that age. This

fact, together with the greater liability of artificially-fed infants,

would seem to connect, at least in such cases, its secondary origin

with some primary irritation of the intestinal canal.

Authors are not yet agreed in regard to the relative frequency of this

disease in boys and girls, though opinions predominate in favor of the

greater number among the males. The statistics of Rilliet and Barthez

and Schmalz show a decidedly greater prevalence among boys.

The comparative frequency of tuberculosis of the mesenteric glands

cannot be determined. Louis found disease of the mesenteric glands in

one-fourth of the autopsies of persons dying of phthisis; in 100 adults

dying of the same disease Lombard found tuberculosis of these glands in

10; and in the bodies of 100 tuberculous children he found the glands

tuberculous in 34 cases. In the Hôpital des Enfants Maladies tubercles

were found in the mesentery of one-half of the children dying of {1185}

tuberculous affections. In the bodies of children dying of tuberculous

disease in the Children's Hospital of Washington tuberculous

degeneration of the mesenteric glands has been found in two-thirds of

the cases, and without a single exception in those dying of rickets.

Authors differ also, and the statistics are equally unreliable, in

regard to the relative frequency of tubercularization of the bronchial

and mesenteric glands. The general opinion seems to be in favor of the

greater frequency in the bronchial glands. In a majority of cases both

sets of glands are found diseased.

The geographical distribution of tabes mesenterica is as universal as

that of scrofula and pulmonary phthisis. No country or climate is

exempt, yet there is no locality in which it is endemic. It has been

observed among all civilized nations, in the cold regions as well as in

the tropical countries. Wherever scrofulous and phthisical diseases are

known, there also are found cases of tabes mesenterica. Livingstone has

stated that scrofula is unknown in some regions in Central Africa, and

other travellers have made similar statements in regard to some Indian

tribes. The statistics of the Children's Hospital of Washington show a

far greater frequency among the African race than among the whites. It

belongs to no class or condition of life, but occurs more frequently

among the children of the squalid than among the children of the

affluent and well-to-do.

ETIOLOGY.--Predisposing Causes.--Modern as well as the older authors

have very generally accepted the conclusion that a constitutional

tendency or liability to this disease is its most frequent and

potential etiological factor. This predisposition may be either

inherited or acquired. The ancients called it the strumous, and the

more recent writers the scrofulous or tuberculous, diathesis. Lugol

maintained that this diathesis is begotten of old and syphilitic

fathers, and others state that children of parents nearly related and

of those broken down by disease and excesses may inherit it. That it is

transmitted by scrofulous and phthisical parents no one can doubt, but

as yet it cannot be defined to be anything more than a peculiarity of

the constitution which may exhibit abnormal reactions against

irritating influences. The scrofulous habit is believed to be indicated

by physical appearances which represent two extremes. The erethic form

is characterized by a feeble and delicate frame; deficient muscular

development; transparent, smooth, and florid skin; light hair and blue

eyes, large pupils; precocious intellect and sanguine temperament; the

torpid form, by a large head; large and tumid upper lip; soft and

flaccid flesh, bloated appearance; short and thick neck; muscular

incapacity, tumid abdomen, and sluggish intellect. Some of these

features are more frequently symptoms of the actual disease than of the

existence of a predisposition to it, and, except so far as they may

refer to a primary scrofulous or pulmonary disease, cannot be accepted

as indicative of the presence of a constitutional tendency to

tuberculosis of the mesenteric glands. A tumid abdomen, rapid

emaciation, and anæmia are far more valuable signs of the disease of

these glands.

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 2 · 第 166 / 184 段