Finally, many of the difficulties connected with this subject are

reasonably met by Hutchinson's[241] doctrine that there exists a state

of tissue-health which is transmissible by inheritance, which involves

liability to inflammations of joints and fibrous structures, and upon

this arthritic diathesis as a foundation may be built up, under the

influence of special causes, a tendency to gout, rheumatism, or any one

of their various modifications or combinations.

[Footnote 241: _Trans. International Med. Congress_, ii. 95; Guéneau de

Mussy's chap., "De la Diathèse Arthritique," _Clin. Méd._, 1874, t. i.

317-338.]

Hutchinson has demonstrated that gout is often followed by rheumatoid

arthritis, the lesions characteristic of both affections coexisting in

the same joint. Charcot and Cornil had previously observed the same

{90} thing.[242] Acute and perhaps chronic rheumarthritis have

sometimes preceded rheumatoid arthritis. If a predisposition, inherited

or acquired, to rheumatoid arthritis exist, the occurrence of gouty or

rheumatic irritation in the joints may suffice to induce the peculiar

form of disturbance characteristic of the rheumatoid affection, just as

injuries sometimes develop the partial form.

[Footnote 242: _Mémoires de la Société de Biologie_, 1864.]

There is a group of conditions affecting the sexual functions and

organs of women which appear to be specially connected with the general

peripheral form of rheumatoid arthritis. The disease follows pregnancy,

and specially frequent pregnancies, protracted lactation, and various

disorders of menstruation. The latter influence obtained in ten out of

eleven instances of the disease met with in girls under eighteen by

Fuller.[243] The frequency of the disease about the period of the

menopause has been already mentioned. Todd noticed its coincidence with

dysmenorrhoea. Ord in an able and original paper[244] has lately dwelt

upon ovario-uterine disorder or irritation as a frequent active cause

of the disease, having in his opinion met with 33 instances of the

kind. The relationship between these various conditions of the

functions and organs of generation and rheumatoid arthritis cannot be

regarded as settled. Garrod supposed that such conditions, by causing

debility, predisposed to the articular disease. Todd, an ardent

humoralist, held the nexus between the two to be unhealthy secretions

of the uterus, leading to blood impurity; while Ord has ably defended

Remak's view that a direct influence of the nervous system is the real

link of relationship. It seems necessary to remark that mere

coincidence may play a large rôle in the explanation of many of these

cases. In 17 at least of Ord's 33 cases the conditions stated by that

author cannot safely be adduced as anything more; and it is probable

that they would be found present in much the same proportion in any

other chronic painful disease of women.

[Footnote 243: _Loc. cit._, 335.]

[Footnote 244: _Brit. Med. Jour._, i., 1880, 151-153.]

Scrofula and phthisis are regarded by Charcot, Cornil, and Garrod as

frequent antecedents of rheumatoid arthritis: the first had several

times seen white swelling in youth, followed by nodular rheumatism in

later life;[245] and Fuller found that 23 out of 119 victims of

rheumatic gout had lost a parent or one or more brothers and sisters by

consumption.[246] Chlorosis has several times preceded rheumatoid

arthritis. When the prevalence of scrofula, phthisis, and chlorosis is

borne in mind, it will not appear strange that they should frequently

be found amongst the antecedents of rheumatoid arthritis, without

inferring any other relationship between them. Gonorrhoeal rheumatism

has also occasionally preceded rheumatoid arthritis, but Ord and

Hutchinson are probably correct in regarding that affection as a

variety of rheumatoid arthritis.[247]

[Footnote 245: _Loc. cit._, p. 208, foot-note.]

[Footnote 246: _Loc. cit._, p. 334, foot-note.]

[Footnote 247: _Trans. International Med. Congress_, vol. ii. p. 92;

_Brit. Med. Jour._, 1881, p. 158.]

Cold, especially when prolonged and associated with dampness, is

commonly held to be the most common cause of general rheumatoid

arthritis. A protracted residence in low, damp dwellings, deprived of

the sun's rays and of a free circulation of air, is a condition thought

most favorable to the provocation of this disease, perhaps years after

the condition has been done away with.

{91} Poverty and all that it implies are at least frequent antecedents

of the disease (hence one of its epithets, arthritis pauperum), as are

other debilitating influences, such as night-watching, insufficient

food, mental worry, grief, anxiety, etc. Be it remembered, however,

that the disease is frequently observed in the well-to-do, who live in

dry climates and warm houses, are well fed, and want for nothing; so

that the external conditions first mentioned are not essential causes

of the disease, and many of them may act merely as adjuvants.

Direct injury of a joint from a blow, a fracture, a whitlow, etc. may

sometimes induce a local rheumatoid arthritis, which may subsequently

become multiple and involve several articulations more or less

symmetrically.[248]

[Footnote 248: Vide Charcot's and Ord's cases, _loc. cit._]

The partial form presents some peculiarities of causation--thus: it

occurs chiefly in advanced life (senile arthritis), much less

frequently in middle life, very exceptionally in the very young. Men

are much more liable to it than women. It is chiefly this variety which

follows injuries, blows, dislocations, pressure, etc., and the disease

may then be limited to the injured joint and be monoarticular, or it

may extend and become polyarticular, or rarely, as in Ord's case, even

general. This monoarticular form appears to be sometimes induced by

other local irritations of the articular structures than those

following traumatic influences; and as foreign growths in joints and

gouty irritation may respectively induce the lesions indicative of

rheumatoid arthritis, so, it is probable, may simple chronic

rheumatism; and this may be the true relationship existing between

these several affections. It is doubtful at present whether purely

local irritation or injury of a joint can originate the alterations

belonging to rheumatoid arthritis--that is, in the absence of all

predisposition to that disease or of the arthritic diathesis. Cold and

dampness are generally admitted to be causes of the partial form, but

the evidence on this point is not altogether satisfactory. It may be

that chronic articular rheumatism is induced by the prolonged operation

of damp cold, and that the prolonged rheumatic irritation, aggravated

by constant use of the joint and by occasional violence, ultimately

superinduces the profounder alterations characteristic of arthritis

deformans. It appears highly probable that if the predisposition exist,

any long-abiding irritation of a joint, whether the result of violence

or disease, may ultimately originate the alterations of the cartilages

and bones which obtain in rheumatoid arthritis.

As regards the etiology of Heberden's nodosities, and their relation to

other affections of the joints, the following summary must suffice:

They obtain chiefly in advanced life, but do occur rarely in the young;

they are probably somewhat more frequent in women than in men; although

more frequently seen in the upper classes, the poor are not exempt from

them, no doubt because they are specially exposed to slight but

oft-recurring injuries of their digits, such traumatism being an

exciting cause of the disease, especially when confined to a single

joint. The affection is sometimes hereditary; both it and the general

or the partial forms of rheumatoid arthritis may coexist in the same

family and even in the same person. The alterations in the joints are

identical with those found in the general variety of rheumatoid

arthritis, and exist without {92} deposits of urate of soda (Charcot).

It resembles the general form of the disease just mentioned in its

tendency to involve many symmetrical articulations at the same time,

and the partial form in the rarity with which it extends beyond the

joints first attacked. While Heberden's nodosities, as Haygarth taught,

do occur independently of gout and the gouty habit, I believe with

Begbie[249] and Duckworth[250] that in some persons they are evidences

of gout or the gouty diathesis.

[Footnote 249: _Contributions to Practical Med._, 1802, p. 29.]

[Footnote 250: "On Unequivocal Gouty Diseases," _St. Bartholomew's

Hospital Reports_, vol. xvi., 1880, p. 190.]

Quite recently a woman aged forty-eight consulted me with these

nodosities beginning upon the last joint of the fingers, while she was

the subject of vesico-renal irritation and was passing free uric acid

in the urine. Hutchinson has twice seen them in combination with a

peculiar insidious and painless inflammation of the iris and vitreous

body, which occurs in the children of the gouty, yet such children have

no deposits of lithates in their joints, nor any lithiasis, nor acute

paroxysms of true gout, and he considers that "the last joint arthritis

is to be regarded as in part gouty, and in part a kind of articular

chilblain."[251]

[Footnote 251: _Trans. International Med. Cong._, ii. p. 96.]

Lastly, in some instances they are no doubt the hybrid offspring of an

inherited tendency to both gout and rheumatoid arthritis.

No more important principle in pathology exists than has been of late

years insisted upon, especially by Jonathan Hutchinson and in his

recent lecture by Sir James Paget[252]--to wit, that "by inherited

dispositions, accumulating and combining or converging in definite

proportions, new diseases may be developed and old ones be variously

modified."

[Footnote 252: _Lancet_, ii., 1882, 1017-1021.]

The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis is the subject of differences

of opinion very like those existing in regard to acute articular

rheumatism. The weight of evidence is in favor of its diathetic

relationship to rheumatism; and the doctrine of an arthritic diathesis

and of the operation of the causes of the disease through the nervous

system appears to be specially applicable to it, with less difficulty

than to acute rheumatism, and the probability of a specific germ being

its true cause is very remote. What seems to be necessary in addition

to the preceding is, that the causes shall be more persisting and

oft-recurring, so as to maintain a prolonged local irritation of the

articular tissues, or that the neuro-arthritic diathesis shall be

highly developed. Under these conditions the prolonged or oft-repeated

application of cold and damp to the peripheral nerves, severe or

oft-repeated slight injuries to joints, urethral or ovario-uterine

irritation, chronic gout or rheumatism, or even, exceptionally, an

attack of the acute form of these diseases, may originate rheumatoid

arthritis; and all wearing influences, such as anæmia, excessive

menstruation, prolonged lactation, innutrition, failing health, mental

anxiety, or shock, etc., act as adjuvants in the development,

aggravation, and maintenance of the articular disease.

DIAGNOSIS.--It is perhaps not possible to distinguish with certainty

either the acute or the chronic form of rheumatoid arthritis from

subacute or chronic rheumarthritis respectively before the

characteristic deformities of the former affections have appeared.

Acute rheumatoid arthritis, which is comparatively rare, may be said to

exist, rather than subacute {93} articular rheumatism, if the disease

affect early and chiefly the smaller joints of the hands and feet alone

or along with some of the larger articulations, especially the

sterno-clavicular or the temporo-maxillary; if the effusion into the

joints be abundant; if inflammation persist in the articulations first

involved, notwithstanding the invasion of other joints; if the heart

escape; if the patient be a female who is constitutionally delicate, or

has borne children rapidly, or is the subject of disordered

menstruation, or has been attacked soon after childbirth or during

lactation;--finally, if, on cessation of the attack, one or more of the

joints remain swollen and permanently enlarged and impaired in

function. The coexistence of iritis, or a history of a previous attack

of that disease not attributable to syphilis or gout, would strengthen

the above view.

Precisely the same considerations serve to distinguish chronic general

or polyarticular rheumatoid arthritis from chronic articular

rheumatism, with the following qualifications: endo- or pericarditis is

not of frequent occurrence in chronic rheumatism, so that this

distinction is not available, and chronic rheumarthritis of long

standing does sometimes impair the movements of the joints, and even

produce slight alterations in them. However, it does not, as a rule,

involve so many joints as rheumatoid arthritis; it is less symmetrical

in its distribution, and much less prone to implicate the

sterno-clavicular, the temporo-maxillary, or the vertebral

articulations. Nor does it cause removal of the articular cartilage,

enlargement of the heads of the bones, and the formation of osteophytes

around them, and of loose bodies in the articulations, together with

marked deformities and luxations of the joints. A history of a remote

or recent attack of acute rheumarthritis or of chorea, or the presence

of chronic valvular disease, would strongly indicate the simple

rheumatic nature of the case.

The partial form of rheumatoid arthritis can with even less certainty

than the general be distinguished from chronic articular rheumatism

before the characteristic alterations of the joints have been

developed, more especially as it is sometimes a consequence of gouty

irritation and probably of chronic rheumatism. Chronic arthritis

following a traumatic cause, and persisting obstinately in the injured

joint is probably rheumatoid, if not strumous, gouty, or periarthritic.

But before definitely deciding it will be prudent to await the

development of some of the characteristic alterations of structure

appertaining to rheumatoid arthritis. An affection of the shoulder

frequently occurs which resembles in many respects rheumatoid

arthritis, and has been well described by Simon Duplay[253] and W.

Pepper.[254] It usually follows an injury, such as contusion, sprain,

etc., of the joint, but may be spontaneous; it is unattended by

swelling or deformity. Its early symptoms are pain on pressure of the

shoulder a little below the outer border of the acromion, and

especially behind it and at the coracoid process, also about the

insertion of the deltoid and below the acromion during movements of the

joint, especially when the arm is raised from the side or rotated

inwardly; early restriction of these movements, which increases till a

fibrous ankylosis becomes established and scapula and humerus move

together as one piece, motion between those bones no longer existing,

and forcible attempts to produce it giving great pain, and sometimes

producing {94} crepitus in or about the articulation; sometimes early

numbness and pain down the member to the hand in the course of the

ulnar, internal cutaneous, or the radial nerve; vicious and painful

semiflexion of the elbow; after a time wasting of the group of muscles

which move the shoulder-joint. Although usually monoarticular and of

traumatic origin, I have seen it affect first one and then the other

shoulder in the absence of any known injury, and beginning like a

neuritis or a neuralgia of the scapulo-humeral nerves. Duplay, however,

regards it as a periarthritis. It may be distinguished from the

rheumatoid arthritis by the absence of effusion into or enlargement of

the articulation, and of deformity of the bones; by the early

restriction of the movements and the rapid development of adhesions

which fix the articulation; and by the curability of the disease.

[Footnote 253: _Archives Générales de Méd._, Nov., 1872, pp. 512-542.]

[Footnote 254: _Archives of Med._, Oct., 1880.]

The articular affection of locomotor ataxia sometimes closely resembles

monoarticular rheumatoid arthritis,[255] but may be distinguished by

its sudden invasion, often without pain or fever; the prompt

development of a general and often enormous tumefaction of the entire

member, with copious effusion into the joint; the early destruction of

the articular cartilages, the rapid wearing away of the heads of the

bones, and the proneness to spontaneous fracture of their brittle

shafts; the prompt absorption of the articular effusion, followed by a

relaxed state of the ligaments and a facility of dislocation; the early

occurrence of the articular affection, when motor inco-ordination is

scarcely developed, and its frequent association with the crises of

ataxia or the presence of some of the other symptoms of that disease.

The importance of these facts will be especially evident in those

examples of ataxic articular disease in which, at an advanced stage,

eburnation and deformity of the articular surfaces, with the formation

of loose bodies and osteophytes, are observed, just as they are in

arthritis deformans.

[Footnote 255: Charcot's _Lectures on Diseases of the Nervous System_,

Syd. Soc., 1877; _Archives de Physiologie_, t. i., p. 161, 1868;

_ibid._, xi., 1869.]

Articular disease closely allied to what occurs in locomotor ataxia is

now and then observed in the early stages of progressive muscular

atrophy,[256] but while the large joints, more particularly the knee

and the shoulder, suffer in the former affection, the phalangeal

chiefly and the larger articulations more rarely are attacked in the

latter. Of course the peculiar symptoms of progressive muscular atrophy

coexisting with those of the articular affection would serve to

distinguish the latter from rheumatoid arthritis.

[Footnote 256: Remak, _Allgem. Med. Central. Zeitung_, March, 1862;

Rosenthal, _Clinical Treatise on Diseases of the Nervous System_,

translated by L. Putzel, M.D., 1879, p. 286.]

It is often very difficult to say whether a given case is one of

chronic rheumatoid arthritis or of chronic gout; and there is no doubt

that in England, where gout prevails, it is not unfrequently associated

with rheumatoid arthritis, sometimes preceding and even causing it,

much more often following it, for the one does not exclude the other.

While rheumatoid arthritis most frequently begins in the hand, and is

usually symmetrical and bilateral, gout commonly begins in the lower

extremities, and especially in the metatarsal joint of the great toe,

and of one foot only. Chronic gout is far more frequently preceded by

attacks of acute gout than chronic rheumatoid arthritis is by the acute

form of that affection; a history of inherited predisposition, of

indulgence in the {95} use of wine, ale, porter, and of animal food, of

deficient bodily exercise, with perhaps great mental occupation or

anxiety, of recurring gouty dyspepsia or of a tendency to lithiasis,

would indicate gout, while the absence of these and a history of

frequent exposure to cold and wet, of injury to the joint, of previous

exhausting disease or drain, of impaired health, debility, or poverty,

would strongly imply rheumatoid arthritis. Gout is especially observed

in males over thirty, and very rarely in children; general rheumatoid

arthritis is chiefly a disease of females during menstrual life, and

occasionally occurs in children of either sex.

The partial form is, like gout, chiefly a disease of men, but occurs

generally at a more advanced age than gout. Even chronic gout is more

or less paroxysmal, with distinct intermissions; chronic rheumatoid

arthritis is more or less abiding and progressive, with only remissions

in its course and severity; the former is frequently associated with

chronic renal disease, the latter is not. The urate-of-soda deposits

about the articulations in gout appear as more or less round or ovoid

swellings in the close vicinity of the joints, but not observing their

exact level or their general form; softish when recent, they never

acquire a bony hardness, and are nearly always capable of slight

lateral movement. The skin covering them is frequently stretched and

glossy, and may exhibit white spots of urate of soda. The articular

nodosities in chronic rheumatoid arthritis are actual osseous

enlargements of, or outgrowths from, the articular surfaces, forming

part of them, immovable and conserving more or less their form. The

integument covering the nodosities is not glossy or dotted with

chalk-like specks. The several types of deformity of the fingers

previously described, and mainly produced in rheumatoid arthritis by

muscular contractions and altered shape of the articular surfaces, are

not seen in gout. Finally, if chalk-like concretions are visible in the

ears, joints, or finger-ends, or if the blood contain uric acid, gout

is present. While rheumatoid arthritis and chronic gout occasionally

coexist in the same patient in England, in Canada, where the latter

disease is comparatively rare and the former quite common, the writer

does not remember to have observed such coexistence.

Besides the acute syphilitic disease of the joints already alluded to

as occurring in children (inherited), a chronic arthritis is observed

in the adult amongst the very late lesions of syphilis. It is usually

monoarticular, affects the larger joints, especially the knee, and may

originate either in the synovial membrane or in the bone and

periosteum. In syphilitic synovitis the history of the case, the

existence occasionally of soft gummy tumors in the periarticular

tissues and of hydrarthrosis, the trivial degree of pain and

tenderness, the insidious invasion and chronic course of the affection,

and its prompt relief by antisyphilitic remedies, will indicate the

nature of the case.

When it originates in the bone and periosteum, although the invasion

may be prompt and the pain at first severe, the latter usually

moderates greatly and becomes nocturnal, and the articular surfaces

present localized rather than general enlargement (hyperostosis); nodes

often coexist; effusion is moderate, unless the synovial membrane is

also involved, and full doses of iodide of potassium will soon afford

relief.

PROGNOSIS.--In the polyarticular form the course varies much more than

is commonly believed, and the disease must not be regarded as

necessarily {96} progressive and incurable. When it occurs in young

persons, and in children more especially, although it may suffer

exacerbations and remissions for a few years, yet arrest of the disease

and recovery of the functions of the joints, sometimes with very little

deformity, now and then take place under suitable management. Quite

recently a man of thirty-two consulted me about a vesical affection who

from the age of eight had suffered every winter for twenty years from

rheumatoid arthritis in his hands and feet, and finally in the knees.

Yet when seen by me he had been free from pain in his joints for three

years, and, although they were somewhat deformed, their movements were

remarkably free and painless.

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 2 · 第 11 / 184 段