TENNIS COURT.

EARLY THEATRICALS—THE CANONGATE THEATRE—DIGGES AND MRS

BELLAMY—A THEATRICAL RIOT.

‘Just without the Water-gate,’ says Maitland, ‘on the eastern side of

the street, was the Royal Tennis Court, anciently called the Catchpel

[from Cache, a game since called _Fives_, and a favourite amusement

in Scotland so early as the reign of James IV.].’ The house—a long,

narrow building with a court—was burned down in modern times, and

rebuilt for workshops. Yet the place continues to possess some interest

as connected with the early and obscure history of the stage in

Scotland, not to speak of the tennis itself, which was a fashionable

amusement in Scotland in the seventeenth century, and here played by

the Duke of York, Law the financial schemer, and other remarkable

persons.

The first known appearance of the post-reformation theatre in Edinburgh

was in the reign of King James VI., when several companies came from

London, chiefly for the amusement of the Court, including one to which

Shakespeare is known to have belonged, though his personal attendance

cannot be substantiated. There was no such thing, probably, as a play

acted in Edinburgh from the departure of James in 1603 till the arrival

of his grandson, the Duke of York, in 1680.

Threatened by the Whig party in the House of Commons with an exclusion

from the throne of England on account of his adherence to popery, this

prince made use of his exile in Scotland to conciliate the nobles, and

attach them to his person. His beautiful young wife, Mary of Modena,

and his second daughter, the _Lady Anne_, assisted by giving parties

at the palace—where, by the bye, tea was now first introduced into

Scotland. Easy and obliging in their manners, these ladies revived

the entertainment of the masque, and took parts themselves in the

performance. At length, for his own amusement and that of his friends,

James had some of his own company of players brought down to Holyrood

and established in a little theatre, which was fitted up in the Tennis

Court. On this occasion the remainder of the company playing at Oxford

apologised for the diminution of their strength in the following lines

written by Dryden:

‘Discord and plots, which have undone our age,

With the same ruin have o’erwhelmed the stage.

Our house has suffered in the common woe;

We have been troubled with Scots rebels too.

Our brethren have from Thames to Tweed departed,

And of our sisters, all the kinder-hearted

To Edinburgh gone, or coached or carted.

With bonny _Blew cap_ there they act all night,

For Scotch half-crowns—in English threepence hight.

One nymph to whom fat Sir John Falstaff’s lean,

There, with her single person, fills the scene.

Another, with long use and age decayed,

Died here old woman, and there rose a maid.

Our trusty door-keeper, of former time,

There struts and swaggers in heroic rhyme.

Tack but a copper lace to drugget suit,

And there’s a hero made without dispute;

And that which was a capon’s tail before,

Becomes a plume for Indian emperor.

But all his subjects, to express the care

Of imitation, go like Indians bare.

Laced linen there would be a dangerous thing,

It might perhaps a new rebellion bring;

The Scot who wore it would be chosen king.’

We learn from Fountainhall’s _Diary_ that on the celebration of the

king’s birthday, 1681, the duke honoured the magistrates of the city

with his presence in the theatre—namely, this theatre in the Tennis

Court.

No further glimpse of our city’s theatrical history is obtained till

1705, when we find a Mr Abel announcing a concert in the Tennis Court,

under the patronage of the Duke of Argyll, then acting as the queen’s

commissioner to the Parliament. It is probable that the concert was

only a cloak to some theatrical representation. This is the more

likely from a tradition already mentioned of some old members of the

Spendthrift Club who once frequented the tavern of a Mrs Hamilton,

whose husband recollected having attended the theatre in the Tennis

Court at Holyrood House, when the play was _The Spanish Friar_, and

many members of the Union Parliament were present in the house.

Theatrical amusements appear to have been continued at the Tennis Court

in the year 1710, if we are to place any reliance upon the following

anecdote: When Mrs Siddons came to Edinburgh in 1784, the late Mr

Alexander Campbell, author of the _History of Scottish Poetry_, asked

Miss Pitcairn, daughter of Dr Pitcairn, to accompany him to one of the

representations. The old lady refused, saying with coquettish vivacity:

‘Laddie, wad ye ha’e an auld lass like me to be running after the

play-actors—me that hasna been at a theatre since I gaed wi’ papa

to the Canongate in the year _ten_?’ The theatre was in those days

encouraged chiefly by such Jacobites as Dr Pitcairn. It was denounced

by the clergy as a hotbed of vice and profanity.

After this we hear no more of the theatre in the Tennis Court. The next

place where the drama set up its head was in a house in Carrubber’s

Close, under the management of an Italian lady styled Signora Violante,

who paid two visits to Edinburgh. After her came, in 1726, one Tony

Alston, who set up his scenes in the same house, and whose first

prologue was written by Ramsay: it may be found in the works of that

poet. In 1727 the Society of High Constables, of which Ramsay was then

a member, endeavoured to ‘suppress the abominable stage-plays lately

set up by Anthony Alston.’[263] Mr Alston played for a season or two,

under the fulminations of the clergy and a prosecution on their part in

the Court of Session.

Traditions of Edinburgh · 第 291 / 317 题