PANMURE HOUSE—ADAM SMITH.

At the bottom of a close a little way below the Canongate Church,

there is a house which a few years ago bore the appearance of one of

those small semi-quadrangular manor-houses which were prevalent in

the country about the middle of the seventeenth century. It is now

altered, and brought into juxtaposition with the coarse details of

an ironfoundry, yet still is not without some traits of its original

style. The name of Panmure House takes the mind back to the Earls of

Panmure, the fourth of whom lost title and estates for his concern in

the affair of 1715; but I am not certain of any earlier proprietor of

this family than William Maule, nephew of the attainted earl, created

Earl of Panmure as an Irish title in 1743. _He_ possessed the house in

the middle of the last century.

[Illustration: Back of Canongate Tolbooth—Tolbooth Wynd.]

All reference to rank in connection with this house appears trivial

in comparison with the fact that it was the residence of Adam Smith

from 1778, when he came to live in Edinburgh as a commissioner of the

customs, till his death in 1790, when he was interred in a somewhat

obscure situation at the back of the Canongate Tolbooth. In his time

the house must have seen the most intellectual company to be had in

Scotland; but it had not the honour of being the birthplace of any

of Smith’s great works. His last and greatest—the book which has

undoubtedly done more for the good of the community than any other

ever produced in Scotland—was the work of ten quiet, studious years

previous to 1778, during which the philosopher lived in his mother’s

house in Kirkcaldy.

The gentle, virtuous character of Smith has left little for the

anecdotist. The utmost simplicity marked the externals of the man. He

said very truly (being in possession of a handsome library) that ‘he

was only a beau in his books.’ Leading an abstracted, scholarly life,

he was ill-fitted for common worldly affairs. Some one remarked to a

friend of mine while Smith still lived: ‘How strange to think of one

who has written so well on the principles of exchange and barter—he

is obliged to get a friend to buy his horse-corn for him!’ The author

of the _Wealth of Nations_ never thought of marrying. His household

affairs were managed to his perfect contentment by a female cousin, a

Miss Jeanie Douglas, who almost necessarily acquired a great control

over him. It is said that the amiable philosopher, being fond of a bit

sugar, and chid by her for taking it, would sometimes, in sauntering

backwards and forwards along the parlour, watch till Miss Jeanie’s

back was turned in order to supply himself with his favourite morsel.

Such things are not derogatory to greatness like Smith’s: they link

it to human nature, and secure for it the love, as it had previously

possessed the admiration, of common men.

The one personal circumstance regarding Smith which has made the

greatest impression on his fellow-citizens is the rather too well-known

anecdote of the two fishwomen. He was walking along the streets one

day, deeply abstracted, and speaking in a low tone to himself, when he

caught the attention of two of these many-petticoated ladies, engaged

in selling their fish. They exchanged significant looks, bearing strong

reference to the restraints of a well-managed lunatic asylum, and then

sighed one to the other: ‘Aih, sirs; and he’s weel put on too!’—that

is, well dressed; his gentleman-like condition making the case appear

so much the more piteous.

Traditions of Edinburgh · 第 279 / 317 题