TAM O’ THE COWGATE.

A court of old buildings, in a massive style of architecture, existed,

previous to 1829, on a spot in the Cowgate now occupied by the southern

piers of George IV. Bridge. In the middle of the last century it was

used as the Excise-office; but even this was a kind of declension

from its original character. It is certain that the celebrated Thomas

Hamilton, first Earl of Haddington, President of the Court of Session,

and Secretary of State for Scotland, lived here at the end of the

sixteenth century, renting the house from Macgill of Rankeillour.[209]

This distinguished person, from the circumstance of his living here,

was endowed by his master, King James, with the nickname of TAM O’ THE

COWGATE, under which title he is now better remembered than by any

other.

The earl, who had risen through high legal offices to the peerage, and

who was equally noted for his penetration as a judge, his industry

as a collector of decisions, and his talent for amassing wealth,

was one evening, after a day’s hard labour in the public service,

solacing himself with a friend over a flask of wine in his house in the

Cowgate[210]—attired, for his better ease, in a nightgown, cap, and

slippers—when he was suddenly disturbed by a great hubbub which arose

under his window in the street. This soon turned out to be a _bicker_

between the High School youths and those of the College; and it also

appeared that the latter, fully victorious, were, notwithstanding a

valiant defence, in the act of driving their antagonists before them.

The Earl of Haddington’s sympathies were awakened in favour of the

retiring party, for he had been brought up at the High School, and

going thence to complete his education at Paris, had no similar reason

to affect the College. He therefore sprang up, dashed into the street,

sided with and rallied the fugitives, and took a most animated share

in the combat that ensued, so that finally the High School youths,

acquiring fresh strength and valour at seeing themselves befriended by

the prime judge and privy-councillor of their country (though not in

his most formidable habiliments), succeeded in turning the scale of

victory upon the College youths, in spite of their superior individual

ages and strength. The earl, who assumed the command of the party, and

excited their spirits by word as well as action, was not content till

he had pursued the Collegianers through the Grassmarket, and out at

the West Port, the gate of which he locked against their return, thus

compelling them to spend the night in the suburbs and the fields. He

then returned home in triumph to his castle of comfort in the Cowgate,

and resumed the enjoyment of his friend and flask. We can easily

imagine what a rare jest this must have been for King Jamie.

[Illustration: A Court of Old Buildings.]

When this monarch visited Scotland in 1617, he found the old statesman

very rich, and was informed that the people believed him to be in

possession of the Philosopher’s Stone; there being no other feasible

mode of accounting for his immense wealth, which rather seemed the

effect of supernatural agency than of worldly prudence or talent. King

James, quite tickled with the idea of the Philosopher’s Stone, and

of so enviable a talisman having fallen into the hands of a Scottish

judge, was not long in letting his friend and gossip know of the story

which he had heard respecting him. The Lord President immediately

invited the king, and the rest of the company present, to come to his

house next day, when he would both do his best to give them a good

dinner and lay open to them the mystery of the Philosopher’s Stone.

This agreeable invitation was of course accepted; and the next day

saw his Cowgate _palazzo_ thronged with king and courtiers, all of

whom the President feasted to their hearts’ content. After dinner

the king reminded him of his Philosopher’s Stone, and expressed his

anxiety to be speedily made acquainted with so rare a treasure, when

the pawky lord addressed His Majesty and the company in a short

speech, concluding with this information, that his whole secret lay

in two simple and familiar maxims—‘Never put off till to-morrow what

can be done to-day; nor ever trust to another’s hand what your own

can execute.’ He might have added, from the works of an illustrious

contemporary:

‘This is the only witchcraft I have used;’

and none could have been more effectual.

A ludicrous idea is obtained from the following anecdote of the

estimation in which the wisdom of the Earl of Haddington was held by

the king, and at the same time, perhaps, of that singular monarch’s

usual mode of speech. It must be understood, by way of prefatory

illustration, that King James, who was the author of the earl’s popular

appellation, ‘_Tam o’ the Cowgate_,’ had a custom of bestowing such

ridiculous _sobriquets_ on his principal councillors and courtiers.

Thus he conferred upon that grave and sagacious statesman, John, Earl

of Mar, the nickname _Jock o’ Sklates_—probably in allusion to some

circumstance which occurred in their young days when they were the

fellow-pupils of Buchanan. On hearing of a meditated alliance between

the Haddington and Mar families, His Majesty exclaimed, betwixt jest

and earnest: ‘The Lord hand a grup o’ me! If Tam o’ the Cowgate’s

son marry Jock o’ Sklates’s daughter, what’s to come o’ _me_?’ The

good-natured monarch probably apprehended that so close a union betwixt

two of his most subtle statesmen might make them too much for their

master—as hounds are most dangerous when they hunt in couples.

The Earl of Haddington died in 1637, full of years and honours. At

Tyningham, the seat of his family, there are two portraits of his

lordship, one a half-length, the other a head; as also his state-dress;

and it is a circumstance too characteristic to be overlooked that in

the crimson-velvet breeches there are no fewer than _nine pockets_!

Among many of the earl’s papers which remain in Tyningham House, one

contains a memorandum conveying a curious idea of the way in which

public and political affairs were then managed in Scotland. The paper

details the heads of a petition in his own handwriting to the Privy

Council, and at the end is a note ‘to _gar_ [that is, make] the

chancellor’ do something else in his behalf.

A younger son of Tam o’ the Cowgate was a person of much ingenuity, and

was popularly known, for what reason I cannot tell, by the nickname

of ‘Dear Sandie Hamilton.’ He had a foundry in the Potterrow, where

he fabricated the cannon employed in the first Covenanting war in

1639. This artillery, be it remarked, was not formed exclusively of

metal. The greater part of the composition was leather; and yet, we

are informed, they did some considerable execution at the battle of

Newburnford, above Newcastle (August 28, 1640), where the Scots drove

a large advanced party of Charles I.’s troops before them, thereby

causing the king to enter into a new treaty. The cannon, which were

commonly called ‘Dear Sandie’s Stoups,’ were carried in swivel fashion

between two horses.

The Excise-office had been removed, about 1730, from the Parliament

Square to the house occupied many years before by Tam o’ the Cowgate.

It afforded excellent accommodations for this important public office.

The principal room on the second floor, towards the Cowgate, was a very

superb one, having a stucco ceiling divided into square compartments,

each of which contained some elegant device. To the rear of the house

was a bowling-green, which the Commissioners of Excise let on lease

to a person of the name of Thomson. In those days bowling was a much

more prevalent amusement than now, being chiefly a favourite with the

graver order of the citizens. There were then no fewer than three

bowling-greens in the grounds around Heriot’s Hospital; one in the

Canongate, near the Tolbooth; another on the opposite side of the

street; another immediately behind the palace of Holyrood House, where

the Duke of York used to play when in Scotland; and perhaps several

others scattered about the outskirts of the town. The arena behind the

Excise-office was called Thomson’s Green, from the name of the man who

kept it; and it may be worth while to remind the reader that it is

alluded to in that pleasant-spirited poem by Allan Ramsay, in imitation

of the _Vides ut alta_ of Horace:

‘Driving their ba’s frae whins or tee,

There’s no ae gouffer to be seen,

Nor doucer folk wysing a-jee

The byas bowls on Tamson’s green.’

The green was latterly occupied by the relict of this Thomson; and

among the bad debts on the Excise books, all of which are yearly

brought forward and enumerated, there still stands a sum of something

more than six pounds against Widow Thomson, being the last half-year’s

rent of _the green_, which the poor woman had been unable to pay.

The north side of Brown’s Square was built upon part of this space

of ground; the rest remained a vacant area for the recreation of the

people dwelling in Merchant Street, until the erection of the bridge,

which has overrun that, as well as every other part of the scene of

this article.[211]

Traditions of Edinburgh · 第 229 / 317 题