THE BLUE BLANKET—MOBS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY—BOWED JOSEPH.

The Edinburgh populace was noted, during many ages, for its readiness

to rise in tumultuary fashion, whether under the prompting of religious

zeal or from inferior motives. At an early time they became an

impromptu army, each citizen possessing weapons which he was ready

and willing to use. Thus they are understood to have risen in 1482 to

redeem James III. from restraint in the Castle; for which service,

besides certain privileges, ‘he granted them,’ says Maitland, ‘a banner

or standard, with a power to display the same in defence of their

king, country, and their own right.’ The historian adds: ‘This flag,

at present denominated the BLUE BLANKET, is kept by the Convener of

the Trades; at whose appearance therewith, ’tis said that not only

the artificers of Edinburgh are obliged to repair to it, but all the

artisans or craftsmen within Scotland are bound to follow it, and fight

under the Convener of Edinburgh, as aforesaid.’ The Blue Blanket, I may

mention, has become a sort of myth in Edinburgh, being magnified by the

popular imagination into a banner which the citizens carried with them

to the Holy Land in one of the Crusades—expeditions which took place

before Edinburgh had become a town fit to furnish any distinct corps of

armed men.[157]

When the Protestant faith came to stir up men’s minds, the lower order

of citizens became a formidable body indeed. James VI., who had more

than once experienced their violence, and consequently knew them well,

says very naïvely in his _Basilicon Doron_, or ‘Book of Instruction’ to

his son: ‘They think we should be content with their work, how bad and

dear soever it be; and if they be in anything controuled, up goeth the

_Blue Blanket_!’

The tumults at the introduction of the Service-book, in 1637, need

only be alluded to. So late as the Revolution there appears a military

spirit of great boldness in the Edinburgh populace, reminding us of

that of Paris in our own times: witness the bloody contests which took

place in accomplishing the destruction of the papistical arrangements

at the Abbey, December 1688. The Union mobs were of unexampled

violence; and Edinburgh was only kept in some degree of quiet, during

the greater part of that crisis, by a great assemblage of troops.

Finally, in the Porteous mob we have a singular example of popular

vengeance, wreaked out in the most cool but determined manner. Men seem

to have been habitually under an impression in those days that the

law was at once an imperfect and a partial power. They seem to have

felt themselves constantly liable to be called upon to supplement its

energy, or control or compensate for its errors. The mob had at that

time a part in the state.

[Illustration: ‘General’ Joe Smith laying down the Law to the

Magistrates.]

In this ‘fierce democracy’ there once arose a mighty Pyrrhus, who

contrived, by dint of popular qualifications, to subject the rabble to

his command, and to get himself elected, by acclamation, dictator of

all its motions and exploits. How he acquired his wonderful power is

not recorded; but it is to be supposed that his activity on occasions

of mobbing, his boldness and sagacity, his strong voice and uncommonly

powerful whistle, together with the mere whim or humour of the thing,

conspired to his promotion. His trade was that of a cobbler, and he

resided in some obscure den in the Cowgate. His person was low and

deformed, with the sole good property of great muscular strength in the

arms. Yet this wretch, miserable and contemptible as he appeared, might

be said to have had at one time the command of the Scottish metropolis.

The magistrates, it is true, assembled every Wednesday forenoon to

manage the affairs and deliberate upon the improvements of the city;

but their power was merely that of a viceroyalty. _Bowed Joseph_,

otherwise called General Joseph Smith, was the only true potentate;

and their resolutions could only be carried into effect when not

inconsistent with his views of policy.

In exercising the functions of his perilous office, it does not appear

that he ever drew down the vengeance of the more lawfully constituted

authorities of the land. On the contrary, he was in some degree

countenanced by the magistracy, who, however, patronised him rather

from fear than respect. They frequently sent for him in emergencies,

in order to consult with him regarding the best means of appeasing

and dispersing the mob. On such occasions nothing could equal the

consequential air which he assumed. With one hand stuck carelessly into

his side, and another slapped resolutely down upon the table—with a

majestic toss of the head, and as much fierceness in his little gray

eye as if he were himself a mob—he would stand before the anxious and

feeble council, pleading the cause of his compeers, and suggesting the

best means of assuaging their just fury. He was generally despatched

with a promise of amendment and a hogshead of good ale, with which

he could easily succeed in appeasing his men, whose dismissal, after

a speech from himself and a libation from the barrel, was usually

accomplished by the simple words: ‘_Now disperse, my lads!_’

Joseph was not only employed in directing and managing the mobs, but

frequently performed exploits without the co-operation of his greasy

friends, though always for their amusement and in their behalf. Thus,

for instance, when Wilkes by his celebrated Number 45 incensed the

Scottish nation so generally and so bitterly, Joseph got a cart, fitted

up with a high gallows, from which depended a straw-stuffed effigy of

North Britain’s arch-enemy, with the devil perched upon his shoulder;

and this he paraded through the streets, followed by the multitude,

till he came to the Gallow Lee in Leith Walk, where two criminals were

then hanging in chains, beside whom he exposed the figures of Wilkes

and his companion. Thus also, when the Douglas cause was decided

against the popular opinion in the Court of Session, Joseph went up to

the chair of the Lord President as he was going home to his house, and

called him to account for the injustice of his decision. After the said

decision was reversed by the House of Lords, Joseph, by way of triumph

over the Scottish court, dressed up fifteen figures in rags and wigs,

resembling the judicial attire, mounted them on asses, and led them

through the streets, telling the populace that they saw the fifteen

senators of the College of Justice!

When the craft of shoemakers used, in former times, to parade the High

Street, West Bow, and Grassmarket, with inverted tin kettles on their

heads and schoolboys’ rulers in their hands, Joseph—who, though a

leader and commander on every other public occasion, was not admitted

into this procession on account of his being only a cobbler—dressed

himself in his best clothes, with a royal crown painted and gilt and a

wooden truncheon, and marched pompously through the city till he came

to the Netherbow, where he planted himself in the middle of the street

to await the approach of the procession, which he, as a citizen of

Edinburgh, proposed to welcome into the town. When the royal shoemaker

came to the Netherbow Port, Joseph stood forth, removed the truncheon

from his haunch, flourished it in the air, and pointing it to the

ground, with much dignity of manner, addressed his paste-work majesty

in these words: ‘O great King Crispianus! what are we in thy sight but

a parcel of puir slaister-kytes—creeshy cobblers—sons of bitches?’

And I have been assured that this ceremony was performed in a style of

burlesque exhibiting no small artistic power.

Joseph had a wife, whom he would never permit to walk beside him, it

being his opinion that women are inferior to the male part of creation,

and not entitled to the same privileges. He compelled his spouse to

walk a few paces behind him; and when he turned, she was obliged to

make a circuit so as to maintain the precise distance from his person

which he assigned to her. When he wished to say anything to her, he

whistled as upon a dog, upon which she came up to him submissively and

heard what he had to say; after which she respectfully resumed her

station in the rear.

After he had figured for a few years as an active partisan of the

people, his name waxed of such account with them that it is said he

could in the course of an hour collect a crowd of not fewer than ten

thousand persons, all ready to obey his high behests, or to disperse

at his bidding. In collecting his troops he employed a drum, which,

though a general, he did not disdain to beat with his own hands; and

never, surely, had the fiery cross of the Highland chief such an effect

upon the warlike devotion of his clan as Bowed Joseph’s drum had upon

the spirit of the Edinburgh rabble. As he strode along, the street was

cleared of its loungers, every close pouring forth an addition to his

train, like the populous glens adjacent to a large Highland strath

giving forth their accessions to the general force collected by the

aforesaid cross. The Town Rats, who might peep forth like old cautious

snails on hearing his drum, would draw in their horns with a Gaelic

execration, and shut their door, as he approached; while the _Lazy

Corner_ was, at sight of him, a lazy corner no longer; and the West Bow

ceased to resound as he descended.

It would appear, after all, that there was a moral foundation for

Joseph’s power, as there must be for that of all governments of a more

regular nature that would wish to thrive or be lasting. The little man

was never known to act in a bad cause, or in any way to go against the

principles of natural justice. He employed his power in the redress

of such grievances as the law of the land does not or cannot easily

reach; and it was apparent that almost everything he did was for the

sake of what he himself designated _fair-play_. Fair-play, indeed, was

his constant object, whether in clearing room with his brawny arms for

a boxing-match, insulting the constituted authorities, sacking the

granary of a monopolist, or besieging the Town-council in their chamber.

An anecdote which proves this strong love of fair-play deserves to be

recorded. A poor man in the Pleasance having been a little deficient

in his rent, and in the country on business, his landlord seized and

rouped his household furniture, turning out the family to the street.

On the poor man’s return, finding the house desolate and his family in

misery, he went to a neighbouring stable and hanged himself.[158] Bowed

Joseph did not long remain ignorant of the case; and as soon as it

was generally known in the city, he shouldered on his drum, and after

beating it through the streets for half-an-hour, found himself followed

by several thousand persons, inflamed with resentment at the landlord’s

cruelty. With this army he marched to an open space of ground now

covered by Adam Street, Roxburgh Street, &c., named in former times

Thomson’s Park, where, mounted upon the shoulders of six of his

lieutenant-generals, he proceeded to harangue them, in Cambyses’s vein,

concerning the flagrant oppression which they were about to revenge.

He concluded by directing his men to sack the premises of the cruel

landlord, who by this time had wisely made his escape; and this order

was instantly obeyed. Every article which the house contained was

brought out to the street, where, being piled up in a heap, the general

set fire to them with his own hand, while the crowd rent the air with

their acclamations. Some money and bank-notes perished in the blaze,

besides an eight-day clock, which, sensible to the last, calmly struck

ten just as it was consigned to the flames.

On another occasion, during a scarcity, the mob, headed by Joseph, had

compelled all the meal-dealers to sell their meal at a certain price

per peck, under penalty of being obliged to shut up their shops. One of

them, whose place of business was in the Grassmarket, agreed to sell

his meal at the price fixed by the general, for the good of the poor,

as he said; and he did so under the superintendence of Joseph, who

stationed a party at the shop-door to preserve peace and good order

till the whole stock was disposed of, when, by their leader’s command,

the mob gave three hearty cheers, and quietly dispersed. Next day, the

unlucky victualler let his friends know that he had not suffered so

much by this compulsory trade as might be supposed; because, though the

price was below that of the market, he had taken care to use a measure

which gave only about three-fourths instead of the whole. It was not

long ere this intelligence came to the ears of our tribune, who,

immediately collecting a party of his troops, beset the meal-dealer

before he was aware, and compelled him to pay back a fourth of the

price of every peck of meal sold; then giving their victim a hearty

drubbing, they sacked his shop, and quietly dispersed as before.

Some foreign princes happening to visit Edinburgh during Joseph’s

administration, at a period of the year when the mob of Edinburgh

was wont to amuse itself with an annual burning of the pope, the

magistrates felt anxious that this ceremony should for once be

dispensed with, as it might hurt the feelings of their distinguished

visitors. The provost, in this emergency, resolved not to employ his

own authority, but that of Joseph, to whom, accordingly, he despatched

his compliments, with half a guinea, begging his kind offices in

dissuading the mob from the performance of their accustomed sport.

Joseph received the message with the respect due to the commission of

‘his friend the Lord Provost,’ and pocketed the half-guinea with a

complacent smile; but standing up to his full height, and resolutely

shaking his rough head, he gave for answer that ‘he was highly

gratified by his lordship’s message; but, everything considered, the

pope _must be burnt_!’ And so the pope, honest man, _was_ burnt with

all the honours accordingly.

Joseph was at last killed by a fall from the top of a Leith

stage-coach, in returning from the races, while in a state of

intoxication, about the year 1780. It is to be hoped, for the good of

society, that ‘we ne’er shall look upon his like again.’[159]

Traditions of Edinburgh · 第 194 / 317 题