TULZIES.

At the Bowhead there happened, in the year 1596, a combat between James

Johnston of Westerhall and a gentleman of the house of Somerville,

which is thus related in that curious book, the _Memorie of the

Somervilles_.

‘The other actione wherein Westerhall was concerned happened three

years thereftir in Edinburgh, and was only personal on the same

account, betwext Westerhall and Bread (Broad) Hugh Somervill of the

Writes. This gentleman had often formerly foughten with Westerhall upon

equal termes, and being now in Edinburgh about his privat affaires,

standing at the head of the West Bow, Westerhall by accident comeing up

the same, some officious and unhappy fellow says to Westerhall: “There

is Bread Hugh Somervill of the Writes.” Whereupon Westerhall, fancying

he stood there either to waitt him, or out of contempt, he immediately

marches up with his sword drawen, and with the opening of his mouth,

crying: “Turne, villane;” he cuttes Writes in the hint head a deep and

sore wound, the foullest stroak that ever Westerhall was knoune to

give, acknowledged soe, and much regrated eftirwards by himself. Writes

finding himself strucken and wounded, seeing Westerhall (who had not

offered to double his stroak), drawes, and within a short tyme puttes

Westerhall to the defensive part; for being the taller man, and one of

the strongest of his time, with the advantage of the hill, he presses

him sore. Westerhall reteires by little, traverseing the breadth of

the Bow, to gain the advantage of the ascent, to supply the defect of

nature, being of low stature, which Writes observeing, keepes closse to

him, and beares him in front, that he might not quyte what good-fortune

and nature had given him. Thus they continued neer a quarter of ane

hour, clearing the callsay,[27] so that in all the strait Bow there

was not one to be seen without their shop doores, neither durst any man

attempt to red them, every stroak of their swords threatening present

death both to themselves and others that should come neer them. Haveing

now come from the head of the Bow neer to the foot thereof, Westerhall

being in a pair of black buites, which for ordinary he wore closse

drawen up, was quyte tyred. Therefore he stepes back within a shop

doore, and stood upon his defence. The very last stroak that Writes

gave went neer to have brocken his broad sword in peaces, haveing

hitt the lintell of the door, the marke whereof remained there a long

tyme. Thereftir, the toune being by this tyme all in ane uproar, the

halbertiers comeing to seaze upon them, they wer separated and privatly

convoyed to ther chambers. Ther wounds but slight, except that which

Writes had upon his head proved very dangerous; for ther was many bones

taken out of it; however, at lenth, he was perfectly cured, and the

parties themselves, eftir Hugh Lord Somerville’s death, reconcealled,

and all injuries forgotten.’

In times of civil war, personal rencontres of this kind, and even

skirmishes between bands of armed men—usually called tulzies—were of

no unfrequent occurrence upon the streets of Edinburgh. They abounded

during the troublous time of the minority of James VI. On the 24th of

November 1567, the Laird of Airth and the Laird of Wemyss met upon

the High Street, and, together with their followers, fought a bloody

battle, ‘many,’ as Birrel the chronicler reports, ‘being hurte on both

sides by shote of pistoll.’ Three days afterwards there was a strict

proclamation, forbidding ‘the wearing of guns or pistolls, or aney

sick-like fyerwork ingyne, under ye paine of death, the king’s guards

and shouldours only excepted.’ This circumstance seems to be referred

to in _The Abbot_, where the Regent Murray, in allusion to Lord

Seyton’s rencontre with the Leslies, in which Roland Græme had borne

a distinguished part, says: ‘These broils and feuds would shame the

capital of the Great Turk, let alone that of a Christian and reformed

state. But if I live, this gear shall be amended; and men shall say,’

&c.

On the 30th of July 1588, according to the same authority, Sir William

Stewart was slain in Blackfriars Wynd by the Earl of Bothwell [the

fifth earl], who was the most famed disturber of the public peace in

those times. The quarrel had arisen on a former occasion, on account of

some despiteful language used by Sir William, when the fiery earl vowed

the destruction of his enemy in words too shocking to be repeated; ‘sua

therafter rancountering Sir William in ye Blackfriar Wynd by chance,

told him he vold now ...; and vith yat drew his sword; Sir William

standing to hes defence, and having hes back at ye vall, ye earle mad a

thrust at him vith his raper, and strake him in at the back and out at

the belley, and killed him.’

Ten years thereafter, one Robert Cathcart, who had been with the Earl

of Bothwell on this occasion, though it does not appear that he took an

active hand in the murder, was slain in revenge by William Stewart, son

of the deceased, while standing inoffensively at the head of Peebles

Wynd, near the Tron.

In June 1605, one William Thomson, a dagger-maker in the West Bow,

which was even then remarkable for iron-working handicraftsmen, was

slain by John Waterstone, a neighbour of his own, who was next day

beheaded on the Castle-hill for his crime.

In 1640, the Lawnmarket was the scene of a personal combat between

Major Somerville, commander of the forces then in the Castle, devoted

to the Covenanting interest (a relation of Braid Hugh in the preceding

extract), and one Captain Crawfuird, which is related in the following

picturesque and interesting manner by the same writer: ‘But it would

appear this gentleman conceived his affront being publict, noe

satisfactione acted in a private way could save his honour; therefore

to repair the same, he resolves to challange and fight Somervill upon

the High Street of Edenburgh, and at such a tyme when ther should be

most spectators. In order to this designe, he takes the occasione, as

this gentleman was betwext ten and eleven hours in the foirnoon hastily

comeing from the Castle (haveing been then sent for to the Committie of

Estates and General Leslie anent some important busines), to assault

him in this manner; Somervill being past the Weigh-house, Captaine

Crawfuird observeing him, presentlie steps into a high chope upon the

south side of the Landmercat, and there layes by his cloak, haveing a

long broad sword and a large Highland durke by his side; he comes up to

Somervill, and without farder ceremonie sayes: “If you be a pretty man,

draw your sword;” and with that word pulles out his oune sword with

the dagger. Somervill at first was somewhat stertled at the impudence

and boldnesse of the man that durst soe openly and avowedly assault

him, being in publict charge, and even then on his duty. But his honour

and present preservatione gave him noe tyme to consult the conveniency

or inconveniency he was now under, either as to his present charge or

disadvantage of weapons, haveing only a great kaine staff[28] in his

hand, which for ordinary he walked still with, and that same sword

which Generall Rivane had lately gifted him, being a half-rapper sword

backed, hinging in a shoulder-belt far back, as the fashion was then,

he was forced to guaird two or three strokes with his kaine before he

got out his sword, which being now drawne, he soon puts his adversary

to the defencive part, by bearing up soe close to him, and putting home

his thrusts, that the captaine, for all his courage and advantage of

weapons, was forced to give back, having now much adoe to parie the

redoubled thrusts that Somervill let in at him, being now agoeing.

‘The combat (for soe in effect it was, albeit accidental) begane about

the midle of the Landmercat. Somervill drives doune the captaine, still

fighting, neer to the goldsmiths’ chops, where, fearing to be nailled

to the boords (these chops being then all of timber), he resolved by

ane notable blow to revenge all his former affronts; makeing thairfor a

fent, as if he had designed at Somervill’s right side, haveing parried

his thrust with his dagger, he suddenly turnes his hand, and by a

back-blow with his broadsword he thought to have hamshekelled[29] him

in one, if not both of his legges, which Somervill only prevented by

nimbly leaping backward at the tyme, interposeing the great kaine that

was in his left hand, which was quyte cut through with the violence of

the blow. And now Providence soe ordered it, that the captaine missing

his mark, overstrake himself soe far, that in tyme he could not recover

his sword to a fit posture of defence, untill Somervill, haveing beaten

up the dagger that was in the captaine’s left hand with the remaineing

part of his oune stick, he instantly closes with him, and with the

pummil of his sword he instantly strikes him doune to the ground, where

at first, because of his baseness, he was mynded to have nailled him

to the ground, but that his heart relented, haveing him in his mercy.

And att that same instant ther happened several of his oune soulders

to come in, who wer soe incensed, that they wer ready to have cut the

poor captaine all in pieces, if he had not rescued him out of theire

hands, and saw him safely convoyed to prisone, where he was layd in

the irones, and continued in prisone in a most miserable and wretched

condition somewhat more than a year.’[30]

Traditions of Edinburgh · 第 113 / 317 题