By Jerome K. Jerome

The chivalrous spirit of the present conflict informs this

article, which appeared originally in The London Daily News

under the title "The Greatest Game of All: The True Spirit

of War," and is here reproduced by special permission of Mr.

Jerome.

War has been described as the greatest of games. I am not going to

quarrel with the definition. I am going to accept it. From that point

of view there is something to be said for it. As a game it can be

respectable; as a business it is contemptible. Wars for profit--for

gold mines, for mere extension of territory, for markets--degrade a

people. It is like playing cricket for money. A gentleman--man or

nation--does not do such things. But war for love--for love of the

barren hillside, for love of the tattered flag, for love of the

far-off dream--played for a hope, a vision, a faith, with life and

death as the stakes! Yes, there is something to be said for it.

Looked at practically, what, after all, does it matter whether Germany

or Britannia rules the waves? Our tea and our 'baccy, one takes it,

would still be obtainable; one would pay for it in marks instead of

shillings. Our sailor men, instead of answering "Aye, aye, Sir," in

response to Captain's orders, would learn to grunt "Jawohl." Their

wages, their rations would be much the same.

These peaceful Old World villages through which I love to wander with

my dogs; these old gray churches round which our dead have crept to

rest; these lonely farmsteads in quiet valleys musical with the sound

of mother creatures calling to their young; these old men with ruddy

faces; these maidens with quiet eyes who give me greeting as we pass

by in the winding lanes between the hedgerows; the gentle, patient

horses nodding gravely on their homeward way; these tiny cottages

behind their trim bright gardens; this lilliputian riot round the

schoolhouse door; the little timid things in fur and feather peering

anxious, bright-eyed from their hiding places! Suppose the miracle to

happen. Suppose the weather-beaten board nailed to the old beech tree

warning us in faded lettering as we pass beneath it of the penalties

awaiting trespassers were to be superseded by a notice headed

"Verboten!" What essential difference would there be--that a wise man

need vex his soul concerning? We should no longer call it England.

That would be all. The sweep of the hills would not be changed; the

path would still wind through the woodland. Yet just for a name we are

ready to face ruin and death.

It certainly is not business. A business man would stop to weigh the

pros and cons. A German invasion! It would bring what so many of us

desire: Conscription, tariff reform. It might even get rid of Lloyd

George and the Insurance act. And yet that this thing shall not be,

Tory Squire and Laborer Hodge, looking forward to a lifelong wage of

twelve-and-six-pence a week, will fight shoulder to shoulder, die

together, if need be, in the same ditch. Just for a symbol, a faith we

call England. I should say Britain.

Can we explain it even to ourselves? Thousands of Germans come over to

England to live. They prosper among us, take their pleasures with us,

adapt themselves to our English ways, and learn to prefer them.

Thousands of Englishmen make their homes in German cities; find German

ways of living, if anything, suit them better. Suddenly there arises

the question, shall English ways of life or German ways of life

prevail: English or German culture--which shall it be? And the English

who have lived contentedly in Germany for years hasten back to fight

for England, and the desire of every German in England is to break up

his pleasant home among us and fight to bring all Europe into German

ways of thinking.

Clearly the definition is a right one. It is just a game.

Just as all life is a game; joy and sorrow the zest of it, suffering

the strength-giving worth of it. Till Death rings his bell, and the

game is over--for the present. What have we learned from it? What have

we gained from it? Have we played it to our souls' salvation, learning

from it courage, manhood? Or has it broken us, teaching us mean fear

and hate?

I quote from the letter of a young cavalry officer writing from the

trenches:

Although I can't pretend to like this nightmare, I cannot

help realizing that it is doing something for those of us

who are going through it that we otherwise would have

missed; it brings out either the best or worst in a man. It

makes character.

He speaks of a little black dog. They are living in two feet of water,

he and his men. The German lines are a hundred yards off; wounds,

disease, and death are around them. They are worried about this

wretched little dog. He has, it seems, lost his people, and is not to

be comforted. It is a curious picture. One sees the straggling line of

grimy, mud-stained men. They are there to kill; their own life hangs

on a thread. A nightmare of blood and dust and horror, and in the

midst of it, growing there as if the soil suited it, this flower of

pity for a little fellow-creature.

New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 4, July, 1915 April-September, 1915 · 第 198 / 233 题