By Charles Willis Thompson

The subjoined estimate of William J. Bryan's character and

public career, which appeared in THE NEW YORK TIMES of June

9, 1915, is by the hand of one of its staff writers who has

specialized in American national politics.

The plain man of the prairie became Secretary of State when William J.

Bryan did; the prairie then entered diplomacy, international

controversy. The secret of all that has puzzled the land in his

behavior lies in that fact. His hold on the West lies in the fact that

he is in himself the average man of that country, with that man's

ideals, aspirations, defects, and drawbacks. There seems nothing

strange or funny in a Secretary of State who goes to New York and

signs temperance pledges, or holds Billy Sunday's platform in

Philadelphia, when you get a few miles away from the cities; and if it

seems a little queer to New York to find the Secretary of State

undertaking to demolish the Darwinian theory, there are plenty of

regions where the Darwinian theory is regarded as a device of the

devil to upset the Mosaic cosmogony. Chesterton says that Dickens

never wrote down to the mob, because he was himself the mob; and Bryan

never talked down to the men of the prairie for the same reason.

He is not a man of culture, nor of reading. He has been around the

world, but when he came back the books and articles he wrote were such

as might have been published as guide books or in encyclopedias; he

could have written them without leaving home. Travel had no

broadening or polishing effect upon his mind.

The vast influence he still has is due to the fact that the common

man, with all his mistakes and gaucheries, speaks in him, and that

when the common man hears his own thoughts spoken in Bryan's voice he

knows that the accent is sincere. Bryan may have taken up this or that

particular issue because it sounded like a vote-maker, but none of

them represented the least divergence from his course as a whole,

which has always been honestly bent in a certain plain direction. He

never hesitated to be in a minority and never dodged a fight. He is an

innocent theorist, who frequently goes wrong because of the simplicity

of his mental processes; but he acts upon his theories, right or

wrong, with an intrepidity and a whole-hearted courage in which the

ordinary man sees the qualities he himself would like to have, and

dreams he has. His mind is not broad, but it is strong; he is always

sure he is right, and always ready to fight for his beliefs, and he

keeps his hold upon his followers because he is not below them, and

not much above them, and because they know he is honest and sincere.

In 1906, the Democratic Party, picking itself out of the wreckage of

Parker's defeat, was yearning to reunite. "Big business," assaulted

and bruised and banged about by President Roosevelt, was ready to come

into line. Roosevelt or his candidate could be defeated in 1908 only

by Democratic harmony. Bryan was abroad, traveling, and somehow his

distant figure looked less appalling than the near-by figure in the

White House. The East did not ask him to recant his radicalism, but

only not to talk about it. He arrived in New York, and business went

to hear him make a harmony speech. If he made it, business would

support him for President. He made the speech; he declared for

Government ownership of railroads. Business, roaring with pain, fell

back into the Republican arms, and Bryan was defeated for President.

No, Bryan is not an opportunist--not in things that really matter.

William Bayard Hale once accurately described him as "essentially a

preacher, a high-class exhorter, a glorified circuit rider." There are

vast spaces of our country still populated by men and women of the

old-fashioned kind; Chesterton describes them as "full of stale

culture and ancestral simplicity." They are the descendants of the

Puritans--intellectually, at any rate--they look askance on cards,

dancing, and the stage; they are the kind of folks who peopled the

Mississippi Valley in Lincoln's day and Massachusetts in John

Hancock's. Bryan does not talk down to that type for votes; he is that

type. Colonel George Harvey, with sarcastic intent, alleged that Bryan

became a white-ribboner after hearing a little girl recite "The Lips

That Touch Liquor Shall Never Touch Mine." There are regions which

would accept that parable as Gospel truth, and much to Bryan's credit.

Salem, Ill., is a little town which fairly shrieks at you its

pre-eminence as a picture of that type. As you pass through its

orderly little streets, with its little frame houses, all of the same

kind and all neat and unassuming, with its dirt roads and its typical

Town Hall, set correctly back behind a correct little patch of grass

in a neat square, you feel instinctively that the Darwinian theory

must be avoided in your Salem conversation. You know at once that the

same families have lived there for generations. So they have; one of

them was Bryan's, and he was born there on March 19, 1860.

Of course, he was the valedictorian of his class--Illinois College,

1881. Of course, he became a lawyer; and, of course, in the Middle

West, that involved politics. He lived now in Lincoln, Neb., in a

Republican district, but he was a Democrat. There was a landslide in

1890. The whole country went Democratic, and many a forlorn hope

leader in some hide-bound Republican district was swept into Congress,

Bryan among them. He made a great speech on the tariff, which won him

instantly a national reputation; but Lincoln had recovered its

Republican poise, and he did not go back to Congress. He added to his

reputation in his own State, however, as editor of its chief

Democratic organ, The Omaha World-Herald, and went to Chicago as the

head of its delegation to the National Convention of 1896.

At a moment when David B. Hill's masterly presentation of the

gold-standard case and Tillman's failure in his effort at rejoinder

had thrown a wet blanket over the silverites, Bryan came forward with

his "Cross of Gold" speech. The cheering delegations carried him

around the hall on their shoulders. None of the candidates before the

convention was dominating or really of Presidential size; the

convention was deadlocked for many ballots, and at last it turned to

Bryan and nominated him.

His defeat by McKinley really marked the beginning of his career as a

national leader. Despite the accident which had made him the

Democracy's nominal leader, he demonstrated that he was the ablest of

the radicals into whose hands it had fallen, and his nominal

chieftainship became a real one. It was evident from the beginning

that he would be renominated in 1900. When the Spanish war broke out

he offered his services and became Colonel of the Third Nebraska

Regiment. The Republican Administration was taking no chances on his

getting any military glory, and it marooned him in Florida till after

the war. He returned good for evil by going to Washington, uniform and

all, and dragooning reluctant Democratic Senators into voting for the

treaty with Spain whereby we acquired the Philippines. This was one of

his incidental opportunisms; he believed it would give the Democrats a

winning issue, that of imperialism. The cast of Bryan's mind is such

that he always gets his winning issues on wrong end foremost; it gave

the Republicans a winning issue, that of imperialism.

Bryan went down to defeat again in 1900, on this new issue, and as

usual epitaphs were written over his political grave. It is a favorite

parlor game; but Bryan never stays dead, because there is something

enduring in him. What is it? That same spokesmanship for the average

man of many regions, the man of the little parlor with the melodeon or

parlor organ, the plush-bound photograph album and the "History of the

San Francisco Earthquake" bought by subscription from a book agent,

and the grandfather's clock in the corner of the hall.

But in 1904 the Democratic leaders, tired of defeat, turned

desperately to the opposite wing of the party. The radical leaders,

really opportunists, forswore or hid their convictions for the sake of

victory, tried to teach their unskillful tongues the language of

conservatism, and joined in with the conservatives in the nomination

of Parker. But Bryan did not yield; he forswore nothing, hid nothing,

and he fought a lonely fight, the bravest of his life.

His fight was of one man against a multitude. Alone, he had to be

everywhere; he was in the Committee on Resolutions, in the Committee

on Credentials, on the floor of the convention, speaking, fighting,

working, twenty hours a day. He had no one to help him; all his

fellows were on the other side, strangling their convictions and

fighting against him. He was insulted on the platform, even by

fellow-radicals; he was elbowed aside and snarled at by men who had

been more radical than himself; attempts were made to deny him a

hearing. Nothing could daunt him or perturb him; he fought on until

Parker was nominated, went to his hotel at dawn as the convention

adjourned, and fell into his bed in utter collapse. A doctor was

summoned, who said that Bryan must instantly give up all work and

undergo treatment.

That evening the news came that Parker had refused to run unless the

word "gold" was written into the platform; the convention was thrown

into panic; the sick man rose from his bed and entered the wild and

turbulent hall, white-faced, breathing with difficulty, sweat pouring

down his face, and there took up the work again, single-handed still.

He fought on all night, was defeated again, and went under the

doctor's hands. Those speeches in that convention were really the

greatest of his life, though they may not read as well as others;

each of them was a battle.

Parker's defeat by Roosevelt again erased that ever-recurring epitaph

over Bryan's political grave. It was evident at once that nothing

could prevent him from being again the candidate in 1908. Again he was

defeated, and again the epitaph was jubilantly rewritten. He was

extinguished, he would never again be an influence in the party; it

was, to use the phrase of 1896, 1900, and 1904, "the end of Bryan."

Again the epitaph had to be erased. He was so far from being

extinguished that he became the dominating force of the convention of

1912. There is no doubt in the mind of the writer, who was there, that

Bryan had given up all hope of running for President, because, as he

expressed it in a thrilling midnight speech at that convention, he

recognized at last that he had too many enemies ever to expect to win.

But he did determine to be a king-maker if he could not be a king, and

king-maker he was.

Not even the convention of 1904 showed Bryan in better light as a

fighter than that of 1912. He was determined that the reactionaries

should not control the convention. At the beginning he was defeated,

but defeat never affected Bryan in the least in all his life, and this

time, as usual, he only went on fighting. When the convention rejected

him for Temporary Chairman and elected Parker, the embodiment of all

he opposed, he merely took a fresh hold and fought harder.

When he swung Nebraska from Champ Clark to Wilson he had won, and

thereafter Wilson's nomination was only a question of time. He was the

centre of violent scenes, as when maddened men swept down upon him and

shook their standards in his face and seemed on the verge of

assaulting him. When he tried to get a hearing and the opposition

shouted him down, he simply climbed up on the platform beside the

Chairman and forced them to hear. Once, while the whole convention

seemed to be yelling at him, and he stood in the midst of a whirlwind

of angry noise, ex-Governor McCorkle of West Virginia, jumping up and

facing him, shrieked in a voice heard above the cyclone: "Are you a

Democrat?"

"My Democracy has been certified to by six and a half million voters.

But," pointing his palm-leaf fan at McCorkle, with magnificent

contempt, "I will ask the secretary to record one vote in the negative

if the gentleman will give me his name."

He won; Wilson was nominated. He brought his great following into line

for an Eastern man, and Wilson was elected. The new President,

following a precedent set by Taylor, Garfield, and Harrison, made him

Secretary of State.

Then Bryan showed a new side of his character to the country. He

effaced himself in Wilson's interest; he became a loyal subordinate,

accepting a minor place cheerfully and laboring with might and main to

make the Administration a success. It is chiefly due to his efforts

that it was one for its first two years. The new President was unknown

to most of his party, and the legislation he recommended would have

met with internal opposition but for Bryan. The Secretary whipped his

followers into line even for legislation so repugnant to them as the

Currency bill, and the Presidential program went through. In two years

Mr. Wilson had become a definite personality to the country, and had a

following of his own; but his initial success was due to Bryan, and

but for Bryan Mr. Wilson might have had to face a party as divided as

did Cleveland, and might have seen his Administration wrecked as

Cleveland's was.

Mr. Bryan hoped to make an enduring name for himself as Secretary of

State. In the years that had elapsed since he was Colonel of the Third

Nebraska he had become an ardent pacifist, and he dreamed of going

into history with a title greater than that of any other statesman who

ever lived--for such, surely, would have been the meed of the man who

abolished war. That mind of his, honest as the day, but far from

great; strong but not broad, sees everything as simple, not as

complex. Is there a wrong? Why, then, abolish it; it is as simple as

A B C. War is wrong; therefore let us stop it. How? Why, get everybody

to agree not to fight without taking a year to look into the thing.

And he busied himself drafting and negotiating treaties with all the

world to get it to agree to this simple but certain remedy. The

"glorified circuit rider" was at the head of the Department of State

of the United States. If anybody had suggested to him that there were

nations which no treaty could bind, he would have answered, in the

style of the prayer-meeting exhorter, "Ah! I have a higher faith in

human nature." So he worked busily, building himself his niche in the

temple of fame, and meanwhile the greatest war in history broke out.

With such a mind as has been described, it is evident that this event

could not shake Mr. Bryan's confidence in himself or his remedies. To

him it was obvious that the war came because the nations involved had

not signed his treaty; if they had, Germany would have abided by it;

would not have dreamed of treating it as a scrap of paper; would have

waited the prescribed year, and Austria would have given Serbia the

same time to reply to her ultimatum. The mischief was done, but he set

about heroically to repair it; he sought to have the United States

intervene as a peacemaker; he sought to prevent the United States

from protecting its citizens on the high seas, since that seemed

likely to lead to war; and at last, finding his efforts of no avail,

he resigned.

No one who had seen him in his unequal fights for his principles on

less momentous occasions could doubt that he would fight for them to

the end on this greatest one. There is no parallel to his action in

American history. So far as its political aspects are concerned, the

nearest thing to it is Blaine's resignation from Harrison's Cabinet in

1892; but that only faintly resembles it. Blaine did not resign

because of any difference in principles, but because he wanted to

fight the Administration; and the superficial resemblance lies only in

the similarity of the relations of the two Presidents to their

Secretaries of State.

Bryan leaves the Cabinet saddened, but not disillusioned. When he had

been Secretary of State two months he said that he would not have

taken office "if I thought there was to be a war during my tenure." "I

believe," he added, "there will be no war while I am Secretary of

State, and I believe there will be no war so long as I live." It has

not come out that way; it might have so easily come out that way if

only Germany had signed that treaty of his! But he is not

disillusioned; nothing can disillusion him; his ideal is still only a

day or two ahead of him, and he resigns to fight for it, since fight

for it in the Cabinet he cannot any longer.

In the Name of Peace.

By LAVINIA V. WHITNEY.

(After Kipling.)

When the last of the soldiers has fallen, and the cannons lie twisted

aside,

When the last of all homes has been ruined, and the heart of the

youngest girl bride,

We shall wake from our terrible madness, and pause for an eon or two,

Till the Master of all the good soldiers shall call us to battle anew.

Then those that were brave shall be braver--they shall love with a

love more fair;

They shall hear, o'er a worldwide battlefield, the Voice of their God

in the air;

They shall have the real saints for their comrades--Magdalene, Peter,

and Paul;

They shall fight unembittered, and never again shall be weary at all.

And only the Master shall praise us, for only the Master shall lead;

And no one shall fight for his country, and none for his honor or

creed;

But each for the Master Who loves him, and Teuton and Briton and all

Shall fight, each the cause of the other, for the God of the Love of

us All!

New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 4, July, 1915 April-September, 1915 · 第 58 / 233 题