No. 1803.]

DEPARTMENT OF STATE,

Washington, June 9, 1915.

American Ambassador, Berlin:

You are instructed to deliver textually the following note to the

Minister of Foreign Affairs:

In compliance with your Excellency's request I did not fail to

transmit to my Government immediately upon their receipt your note of

May 28 in reply to my note of May 15, and your supplementary note of

June 1, setting forth the conclusions so far as reached by the

Imperial German Government concerning the attacks on the American

steamers Cushing and Gulflight. I am now instructed by my Government

to communicate the following in reply:

The Government of the United States notes with gratification the full

recognition by the Imperial German Government, in discussing the cases

of the Cushing and the Gulflight, of the principle of the freedom of

all parts of the open sea to neutral ships and the frank willingness

of the Imperial German Government to acknowledge and meet its

liability where the fact of attack upon neutral ships "which have not

been guilty of any hostile act" by German aircraft or vessels of war

is satisfactorily established; and the Government of the United States

will in due course lay before the Imperial German Government, as it

requests, full information concerning the attack on the steamer

Cushing.

With regard to the sinking of the steamer Falaba, by which an American

citizen lost his life, the Government of the United States is

surprised to find the Imperial German Government contending that an

effort on the part of a merchantman to escape capture and secure

assistance alters the obligation of the officer seeking to make the

capture in respect of the safety of the lives of those on board the

merchantman, although the vessel had ceased her attempt to escape when

torpedoed. These are not new circumstances. They have been in the

minds of statesmen and of international jurists throughout the

development of naval warfare, and the Government of the United States

does not understand that they have ever been held to alter the

principles of humanity upon which it has insisted. Nothing but actual

forcible resistance or continued efforts to escape by flight when

ordered to stop for the purpose of visit on the part of the

merchantman has ever been held to forfeit the lives of her passengers

or crew. The Government of the United States, however, does not

understand that the Imperial German Government is seeking in this case

to relieve itself of liability, but only intends to set forth the

circumstances which led the commander of the submarine to allow

himself to be hurried into the course which he took.

Your Excellency's note, in discussing the loss of American lives

resulting from the sinking of the steamship Lusitania, adverts at some

length to certain information which the Imperial German Government has

received with regard to the character and outfit of that vessel, and

your Excellency expresses the fear that this information may not have

been brought to the attention of the Government of the United States.

It is stated in the note that the Lusitania was undoubtedly equipped

with masked guns, supplied with trained gunners and special

ammunition, transporting troops from Canada, carrying a cargo not

permitted under the laws of the United States to a vessel also

carrying passengers, and serving, in virtual effect, as an auxiliary

to the naval forces of Great Britain. Fortunately these are matters

concerning which the Government of the United States is in a position

to give the Imperial German Government official information. Of the

facts alleged in your Excellency's note, if true, the Government of

the United States would have been bound to take official cognizance in

performing its recognized duty as a neutral power and in enforcing its

national laws. It was its duty to see to it that the Lusitania was not

armed for offensive action, that she was not serving as a transport,

that she did not carry a cargo prohibited by the statutes of the

United States, and that, if in fact she was a naval vessel of Great

Britain, she should not receive clearance as a merchantman; and it

performed that duty and enforced its statutes with scrupulous

vigilance through its regularly constituted officials. It is able,

therefore, to assure the Imperial German Government that it has been

misinformed. If the Imperial German Government should deem itself to

be in possession of convincing evidence that the officials of the

Government of the United States did not perform these duties with

thoroughness the Government of the United States sincerely hopes that

it will submit that evidence for consideration.

Whatever may be the contentions of the Imperial German Government

regarding the carriage of contraband of war on board the Lusitania or

regarding the explosion of that material by the torpedo, it need only

be said that in the view of this Government these contentions are

irrelevant to the question of the legality of the methods used by the

German naval authorities in sinking the vessel.

But the sinking of passenger ships involves principles of humanity

which throw into the background any special circumstances of detail

that may be thought to affect the cases, principles which lift it, as

the Imperial German Government will no doubt be quick to recognize and

acknowledge, out of the class of ordinary subjects of diplomatic

discussion or of international controversy. Whatever be the other

facts regarding the Lusitania, the principal fact is that a great

steamer, primarily and chiefly a conveyance for passengers, and

carrying more than a thousand souls who had no part or lot in the

conduct of the war, was torpedoed and sunk without so much as a

challenge or a warning, and that men, women, and children were sent to

their death in circumstances unparalleled in modern warfare. The fact

that more than one hundred American citizens were among those who

perished made it the duty of the Government of the United States to

speak of these things and once more, with solemn emphasis, to call the

attention of the Imperial German Government to the grave

responsibility which the Government of the United States conceives

that it has incurred in this tragic occurrence, and to the

indisputable principle upon which that responsibility rests. The

Government of the United States is contending for something much

greater than mere rights of property or privileges of commerce. It is

contending for nothing less high and sacred than the rights of

humanity, which every Government honors itself in respecting and which

no Government is justified in resigning on behalf of those under its

care and authority. Only her actual resistance to capture or refusal

to stop when ordered to do so for the purpose of visit could have

afforded the commander of the submarine any justification for so much

as putting the lives of those on board the ship in jeopardy. This

principle the Government of the United States understands the explicit

instructions issued on August 3, 1914,[3] by the Imperial German

Admiralty to its commanders at sea to have recognized and embodied, as

do the naval codes of all other nations, and upon it every traveler

and seaman had a right to depend. It is upon this principle of

humanity as well as upon the law founded upon this principle that the

United States must stand.

[Footnote 3: The reference made by President Wilson in his first note

of May 13 to the German Government regarding the sinking of the

Lusitania to the "humane and enlightened attitude hitherto assumed by

the Imperial German Government in matters of international right, and

particularly with regard to the freedom of the seas," was based, it

was learned in Washington on June 12, upon the instructions of Aug. 3,

1914, which the German Government sent to its naval commanders. These

German rules are now in the possession of the State Department. While

no mention is made in them of submarine warfare, the extent and method

of the exercise of the right of search and the stoppage of ships is

prescribed with great nicety, and provision is made for the safety of

passengers and crew. After outlining the purpose of visiting and

searching vessels, the regulations state:

All measures are to be carried out in a form whose

observance, even against the enemy, will comport with the

dignity of the German Empire and with a regard for neutrals

conformable to the usages of international law and the

German interest.

The method of signaling ships to be halted is prescribed, and it is

directed that "two successive blank charges are to be fired, and, if

necessary, a shotted charge over the ship" if the signals are not

obeyed. "If the ship does not then stop or makes resistance, the

Captain will compel her to stop," the instructions continue. After

specifying what ships may be captured and destroyed, the regulations

continue:

Before destruction all persons on board, if possible with

their personal effects, are to be placed in safety and all

the ship's papers and other articles of evidence, which in

the opinion of the interested parties are of value for the

judgment of the prize court, are to be taken over by the

Captain.]

The Government of the United States is happy to observe that your

Excellency's note closes with the intimation that the Imperial German

Government is willing, now as before, to accept the good offices of

the United States in an attempt to come to an understanding with the

Government of Great Britain by which the character and conditions of

the war upon the sea may be changed. The Government of the United

States would consider it a privilege thus to serve its friends and the

world. It stands ready at any time to convey to either Government any

intimation or suggestion the other may be willing to have it convey

and cordially invites the Imperial German Government to make use of

its services in this way at its convenience. The whole world is

concerned in anything that may bring about even a partial

accommodation of interests or in any way mitigate the terrors of the

present distressing conflict.

In the meantime, whatever arrangement may happily be made between the

parties to the war, and whatever may in the opinion of the Imperial

German Government have been the provocation or the circumstantial

justification for the past acts of its commanders at sea, the

Government of the United States confidently looks to see the justice

and humanity of the Government of Germany vindicated in all cases

where Americans have been wronged or their rights as neutrals invaded.

The Government of the United States therefore very earnestly and very

solemnly renews the representations of its note transmitted to the

Imperial German Government on the 15th of May, and relies in these

representations upon the principles of humanity, the universally

recognized understandings of international law, and the ancient

friendship of the German Nation.

The Government of the United States cannot admit that the proclamation

of a war zone from which neutral ships have been warned to keep away

may be made to operate as in any degree an abbreviation of the rights

either of American shipmasters or of American citizens bound on lawful

errands as passengers on merchant ships of belligerent nationality. It

does not understand the Imperial German Government to question those

rights. It understands it, also, to accept as established beyond

question the principle that the lives of non combatants cannot

lawfully or rightfully be put in jeopardy by the capture or

destruction of an unresisting merchantman, and to recognize the

obligation to take sufficient precaution to ascertain whether a

suspected merchantman is in fact of belligerent nationality or is in

fact carrying contraband of war under a neutral flag. The Government

of the United States therefore deems it reasonable to expect that the

Imperial German Government will adopt the measures necessary to put

these principles into practice in respect of the safeguarding of

American lives and American ships, and asks for assurances that this

will be done.

ROBERT LANSING,

Secretary of State ad Interim.

New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 4, July, 1915 April-September, 1915 · 第 19 / 233 题