CHAPTER XXXXI.

In speaking of the changes, in habits and customs, which have

occurred in my day, it will be difficult to draw the line between

those, which only my older readers will remember, and those more

recent ones, which will be recalled by the young. In noting these

changes I shall not confine myself to Plymouth, but shall as far

as possible include those which have elsewhere come under my

observation. The population of Plymouth in 1820, two years before

my birth, was 4,384. Its growth to 11,017, in 1905, is one of the

least remarkable changes in the history of the town during that

period. Turning, however, to the nationality of the population, we

find a change which has kept pace with the growing facilities of

international communication, and the restless tide of migration,

which characterized the 19th century. This change in nationality

began to show itself about the time of my birth. Up to that time the

population was not only practically wholly American, but also largely

of Plymouth nativity. There are records showing that in 1813 there

were two Irishmen, John Burke and Michael Murphy, living in Plymouth,

and there are reasons for believing that they and their families were

the only persons of Irish birth in the town. It is possible that the

above two men were servants, or employees of Judge Joshua Thomas,

who lived in the house on Main street, now called the Plymouth

Tavern. At any rate, Judge Thomas must have felt a special interest

in them, as in the year above mentioned, 1813, Bishop Cheverus, by

his invitation, came down from Boston and celebrated mass for their

benefit in the parlors on the southerly side of his house. It is

undoubtedly true that Bishop Cheverus was the most distinguished

Divine who ever visited Plymouth. He was born in Mayenne, France,

Jan. 28, 1768, and came to Boston in 1796, where he became associated

with the Catholic mission. In 1803 he raised by subscription money to

build the Catholic church in Franklin street, the site of which is

now occupied by Devonshire street, and more than $3,000 of the sum

raised was subscribed by Protestants, of whom John Adams headed the

list. The esteem in which he was held in Boston was further shown

by the gratuitous services of Charles Bulfinch, the distinguished

architect, who furnished the design for the church, and by the gift

of a picture of the crucifixion by Henry Sargent, a Boston artist,

to place on its walls. Among the subscribers to the church fund were

Harrison Gray Otis, Benjamin Crowinshield, Theodore Lyman, Thomas

H. Perkins and Samuel Dexter, and General E. Hasket Derby gave the

church a bell. While in Boston Bishop Cheverus accepted invitations

to preach in Protestant churches, following as he said, the example

of Christ, who preached in the synagogues. In 1810 he was consecrated

in Baltimore the first Bishop of Boston, and in 1818 his associate,

the Abbé Mantignon, died, at whose funeral the body was borne to

the grave through the streets of Boston with the Bishop wearing

ecclesiastical garments, and a mitre, presenting a novel scene to

the eyes of New England people. In 1823, the Bishop was called to

France to take charge of the Bishopric of Montauban, and in 1826 was

nominated to the Metropolitan See of Bordeaux. In 1828 he was made

councillor of state, and in 1830 commander of the order of the Holy

Ghost. In February, 1836, he was made a Cardinal, and on the 9th of

March received from Louis Philippe the Cardinal’s hat. He died July

2d, 1836.

Until ocean steamers were built of sufficient size to accommodate

steerage passengers, immigration was chiefly confined to the Irish,

who came in the packet ships plying between London or Liverpool

and New York, Philadelphia, or Boston. There were the Cambridge,

Devonshire, London, Henry Clay, Yorkshire, Liverpool, Ashburton and

Hottingeur, coming to New York; the Daniel Webster, North America,

Anglo Saxon and Ocean Monarch coming to Boston, and the Tuscarora

and Shenandoah to Philadelphia, and for some years their steerages

were crowded with Irish immigrants. With the coming in of the

steamers the numbers largely increased. It was during the period

from 1835 to 1855, that the Irish element began to be perceptible

to any considerable extent in Plymouth. Within my day the first

Irishman to come to the town was John Cassidy, about 1820 or 1830.

He had been living for a time in Boston, and there his son, John S.,

our townsman, was born. He was a blacksmith by trade, and a man of

striking appearance. He had two daughters, whom I knew very well,

fine women; Elizabeth, who married Gridley T. Poole, and Ellen,

who married a Mr. Southmayd of Campton, New Hampshire. There was a

Michael McCarthy who came not long after Mr. Cassidy, whose daughter

was the mother of our late townsman, Timothy Downey. Quite a number

came both before and soon after 1850, including Timothy and John

Quinlan in 1849, John O’Brien in 1851, and not far from those dates

Jeremiah Murray, John Murray, Timothy Regan, Wm. O’Brien, Timothy

Lynch, James Ready, Timothy Hurley, James Lynch, James Burns, Barney

Sullivan and others. For many years the number of Catholics in

Plymouth was insufficient to maintain a church, and father Moran of

Sandwich, where the glass works had gathered a considerable Irish

population, was in the habit of holding service once or twice in

each month in the town hall and Davis Hall, and elsewhere, until the

Catholic church was erected in 1874.

After the advent of the Irish there was for some years quite a large

German immigration, which found occupation in the Cordage works at

Seaside. The German population, however, was rather a changeable

one, and after a few years of savings, it largely found its way

west, and was followed in Plymouth by the Italians, French and

Portuguese, who, added to the Irish, now make up nearly one quarter

of the population of the town. The Portuguese have drifted here

chiefly from New Bedford and Provincetown, to which places they found

their way in vessels bringing the first catch of oil landed at the

Western Islands by whale ships from those ports. The effect of this

immigration on Provincetown has been remarkable. The first time I

ever went to that town was in 1836, when I was permitted as a boy

of fourteen to join a party of older persons in the sloop Thetis,

going one day and returning the next. At that time its population

was about two thousand, nearly all of whom were Cape Cod people, who

had moved there to either engage in the whale or cod fishery, or

to keep stores for the sale of ship chandlery and supplies of all

kinds to vessels making harbor there. A man by the name of Lothrop

from some up Cape town, kept a hotel, and by the aid of loam brought

from distant towns, he was cultivating the only garden in town. The

only street was parallel with the shore, and from fence to fence

it was a bed of loose sand, through the middle of which everybody

waded, the women I have heard it said, having a way of kicking their

heels in walking by which they kept the sand out of their shoes. One

of our party asked the landlord if he could have a horse and ride

through the village. “My dear sir,” said Mr. Lothrop, “there is not

a horse owned in town, but the mail chaise will arrive about six

o’clock, and perhaps the driver will let you have his horse.” During

the administration of Andrew Jackson not only was our National debt

extinguished, but a very considerable surplus revenue grew up, which

in 1836 was divided among the states in the form of a loan, each

state giving its obligation to repay the loan if ever called for.

Massachusetts distributed its share among the towns, and Provincetown

spent her portion in building plank sidewalks. At the present time

the Portuguese constitute a majority of the population of the town.

At the beginning of the civil war one of the measures proposed

for the relief of the financial straits of the government was a

call on the states for the payment of the loan above mentioned. It

has been stated by Mr. L. E. Chittenden, Register of the Treasury

under President Lincoln, that it was found at that time that the

obligations of the Rebel states had mysteriously disappeared.

One of the important results of the foreign immigration in Plymouth

County, and probably elsewhere has been the solution of the problem

concerning the future of our abandoned farms. These foreigners, more

especially the Portuguese and Italians, have picked them up one after

another, and are prospering, where their former native owners failed.

It must not be forgotten, while considering changes in population and

occupation, that the abandonment of the fisheries has caused a great

change in the industries of our town. With seventy-three vessels

engaged in the Grand Bank fishery, as there were thirty-five years

ago, our wharves and flake yards presented busy scenes. The large

increase, however, of our coal and lumber trade, amounting now in the

former, to thirty thousand tons annually, has helped materially to

prevent any recent depreciation of wharf property.

I propose now to speak of the changes which have occurred within

my recollection in carriages and in general methods of travel. I

have in an early chapter referred to buggies and wagons, giving

the derivation of their names, and the countries where they were

originally used. The introduction of the carry-all in Plymouth

occurred within my time, and as far back as I can remember there

were only two, one in the stable of George Drew in Middle street,

and the other owned by Bourne Spooner. It is generally supposed

that its spacious interior gave rise to its name which, however,

is really only a corruption of the name of the French Carriole. A

vehicle called a cab, which is simply an abbreviation of cabriolet

came quite extensively into use in Boston about 1840, but never

reached Plymouth, and in the city has now largely given way to a four

wheeler, which retains the old name. The carriage known as a hack,

brought to America from London, and receiving the name which there

applied to the horse alone, was never introduced into Plymouth until

1870. At the celebration of the dedication of the Soldiers’ Monument

on Training Green in 1869, the committee of arrangements borrowed one

from Geo. W. Wright of Duxbury, and hired another in Boston. There

is probably no city in the world in which the hack has been for more

than a hundred years in such general use as in Boston. The superior

quality for which Boston hacks have long been distinguished, has been

probably due to the fact that wealthy families have patronized hack

stables rather than keep carriages of their own, and they wanted the

best. I can well remember when there were not more than four private

carriages and coachmen in Boston, and when nothing in livery was seen

on its streets. About 1850 Mr. Deacon, who built an elegant mansion

at the south end after the style of a French Chateau, surrounded by a

high brick wall, set up a livery, and when his flunkey first appeared

sitting like Solomon in all his glory on the box, he was followed

and hooted at by the boys. The vehicle for many years in general use

was in Boston, as elsewhere, the chaise. Lawyers and doctors and

merchants constantly used them, and always drove themselves, while

before the days of street cars business men drove every morning

into the city from suburban homes, and put up their horses for the

day in some central stable. I remember stables in Cambridge street,

Bowdoin Square, Howard street, Elm street, Brattle street, Devonshire

street, Franklin street, Federal street, School street, Bromfield

street, Bedford street, West street and Charles street. With the

introduction of street cars leading to neighboring towns, the livery

business gradually disappeared, and the high price of central city

lots has left the older sections of the city with scarcely a place

where a horse can be put up for a night. These stables first found a

new resting place in the extension of Chestnut street on the river

side of Charles street, which Tom Appleton, the Boston wit, called

Horse Chestnut street, but they have gradually extended to localities

farther west. In the process of evolution the wheel has now turned,

and the suburban business men are deserting the street cars, and,

coming to Boston in their automobiles, instead of chaises, put them

up for the day in the grand garage in Park Square. Again referring

to the general use of chaises, I remember that such men as President

Quincy, Lucius Manlius Sargent, Ebenezer Francis and Jeremiah Mason

were frequently seen driving their chaises, and Mr. Webster often

rode in one over the road from Marshfield to Boston, holding the

reins himself, and having a trunk lashed to the axle. Mr. Mason,

above mentioned, the distinguished lawyer, one day when riding in

his chaise, turned from Washington street into Spring Lane, and met

a truckman coming up with his team. He was six feet six inches in

height, but he always sat in his chaise so bent as not to appear to

be a tall man. The truckman called out to him to back out, which Mr.

Mason was not inclined to do, as he would have to back up hill, while

the truckman could more easily back down. Mr. Mason said nothing, but

the truckman finally began to swear at him, and showed a disposition

to fight. Mr. Mason becoming a little angry, began to straighten up

and show his size, much to the astonishment of the man with the team,

who called out, “for God’s sake, Mr., don’t uncoil any more, I’ll get

out of the way.”

The stage derived its name, which it took from the stage coach of

England, from the word stage, meaning a section or the whole of a

road route. The name, however, reached New England many years before

the arrival of the English coach, and was applied to a carriage of

very different construction. The New England stage in the early

part of the last century was a long covered wagon hung on leather

thorough-braces, and contained seats without backs, which were

reached by climbing over the seats in front. In 1801, according to

the Farmer’s Almanac, there were twenty-five lines of coaches running

out of Boston, most of which started from the King’s Inn on the

corner of Exchange street and Market Square. The stages running to

Cambridge and Roxbury and Brookline, made each two trips a day, and

the stage to Plymouth made three trips a week by the way of Hingham,

being ten hours on the road. The South Boston and Dorchester turnpike

running as far as Neponset River, was incorporated, March 4, 1805,

and the Braintree and Weymouth turnpike running from Quincy to Queen

Ann’s Corner in West Scituate, was incorporated March 4, 1803. Thus

a new route was opened by the last named turnpike, over which the

fast line ran every day, while the mail line ran every alternate

day through Hingham. Until the Old Colony Railroad was opened these

turnpikes were toll roads. After a few years the clumsy stage gave

way to the well known English coach made with the addition of a

middle seat with an adjustable back strap. With the exception of the

English post carriage a sort of a barouche drawn by two horses, one

of which was ridden by a uniformed postilion, I have never found a

more comfortable and attractive traveling carriage. In 1846 I rode

with the coachman on one of these coaches from Glasgow to Carlisle,

ninety miles, in nine hours, with the four horses on the gallop, and

never leaving the centre of the track. The red coated guard occupying

a seat at the back of the coach, warned with his horn every team to

clear the road, and when passing a post office he threw off a mail

pouch and took another from a hooked rod, held up by the master of

the post. On approaching a station for change of horses, the guard

gave notice with his horn, and the coachman halting in the middle

of the road, dropped his reins right and left, and four hostlers,

two to unhitch, and two to hitch, would have a new team ready with a

delay of not more than two minutes, the coachman leaving his seat but

once in the nine hours. During the last years of these coaches the

schedule time of a trip from London to Edinburgh, four hundred miles,

was forty hours. The hansom, which for more than fifty years has been

used in London, has found a difficult entrance into Boston, but is

now gradually finding its way into use. The fares charged for them

are much lower in London than in Boston. In 1895 I took one at the

railway station and rode with a fellow passenger to Morley’s hotel at

Trafalgar Square, nearly three miles, and paid two and six pence for

the two, while in Boston the charge would have been from two to three

dollars.

The introduction of omnibuses in Boston, first used in London,

was very gradual. Having an aunt living in Cambridge, one of my

excursions during my vacation visits in Boston was to her home, and

thus I became early familiar with the methods of communication with

that town. As long ago as I can remember these omnibuses, taking the

place of the old coaches, made only two or three trips a day, in

answer to calls entered on a slate at the office in Brattle street,

picking up passengers at their houses, and dropping them at their

destinations. As business increased, passengers were obliged to take

the omnibuses at the office, starting at every hour, and thus they

became known as hourlies. Their business was partially interrupted

for a time by the construction of a branch of the Fitchburg railroad,

which had a station about where the law school is now located, but it

was soon abandoned, and the track was taken up.

As I have begun to speak of matters connected with Boston, I may as

well speak of the changes in that city since my early boyhood. For

this digression I ask to be excused. I was almost as familiar with

Boston, when a boy, as I was with Plymouth, as I spent nearly every

vacation there with my grandmother who lived in Winthrop Place,

which, with Otis Place, formed a circuitous avenue, entering from and

returning to Summer street. Summer street during my early life was

distinguished, not only for its beautiful shade trees and elegant

houses, but also for its notable residents. Among the latter whom I

remember were, Dr. Jacob Bigelow, Robert C. Winthrop, Dr. Putnam,

Edward H. Robbins, Nathaniel Goddard, John Wells, Horace Gray, John

P. Cushing, Benjamin Buzzey, Charles Tappan, Edward Everett, Rev. Dr.

Nathaniel Langdon Frothingham, John C. Gray, Benjamin Rich, Rev. Dr.

Alexander Young, Wm. Sturgis, Joseph Bell, Benjamin Loring, James

W. Paige, and Daniel Webster. There also were Trinity church on the

north side, and the Octagon church, Unitarian, at the junction

of Summer and Bedford streets, while in Winthrop and Otis Place

lived Rufus Choate, Abel Adams, Wm. Perkins, Samuel Whitwell, H. H.

Hunnewell, George Bond, Henry Cabot, Joshua Blake, George Bancroft,

Nathaniel Bowditch, and Israel Thorndike.

When that neighborhood was changed from a residential to a business

one, Winthrop Place was extended across Franklin street to State

street, the whole taking the name of Devonshire street. From Franklin

to Milk street the nucleus of the extended street was Theatre Alley,

so-called, because in the alley was the stage entrance of the Federal

Street Theatre. The Catholic church, which stood on the south side

of Franklin street, was taken down to make way for the extended

street. Ma’am Dunlap’s famous cigar, snuff and tobacco store, which

every gentleman in Boston knew, partly on account of the quality

of her goods, and partly on account of the beauty of her daughter

Rachel, stood on the west side of the alley. Boston has always been

famous for its alleys, at least fifteen of which I remember. They

furnished very convenient cut shorts for those who were in a hurry,

or did not wish to encounter undesirable friends. Mr. Choate, whose

office was on the southerly corner of Court and Washington streets,

lived at different times at the United States hotel, in Edinboro

street and Winthrop Place, and in going home he invariably went down

State to Devonshire street, and thence through Theatre Alley and

Catholic Church Alley. The Alley from State street to Dock Square,

now called Change Alley, was formerly called Flagg Alley, taking

its name from its pavement of flagstones, which again took their

name from Elisha Flagg, who about 1750 opened a quarry in Grafton,

and furnished Boston and some other New England towns with slabs of

that description. For some unknown reason alleys seem to have been

peculiar to seaport places like Provincetown, Salem, Marblehead,

Newburyport and Plymouth, in the last of which were in my day,

Thomas’s Alley, Cooper’s Alley, LeBaron’s Alley, Spooner’s Alley and

Clamshell Alley, all of which remain except Thomas’s Alley on the

south side of the estate of Col. Wm. P. Stoddard, which was closed

some years ago, under an agreement with the town.

On the south side of Franklin street, until about 1800, known as

Barrell’s pasture, extending from the Catholic Alley, now Devonshire

street, up to Hawley street, there was a single block called the

Tontine block, such as we ought to see more of in Boston today. It

was designed by Charles Bulfinch, and contained sixteen dwelling

houses, with a front curved to correspond to the curve of the street,

and built with a palace front, two houses at each end projecting

about six feet, and the centre carried up higher than the rest of the

building, and built over three arches, a central arch for a street

called Arch street to pass through, and one smaller arch on each

side over the Arch street sidewalks. A door under the arch led up

to the old Boston Library, which is still in existence with a home

in Boylston Place. The block was built on the Tontine plan, with a

certain number of owners, the property descending to the survivors.

After some years its tontine feature was abandoned and the property

divided among the survivors.

All through my boyhood, Franklin, Federal, Atkinson, now called

Congress, Pearl, High, Purchase, South, Lincoln, Summer, Arch,

Winter, Tremont, West, Bedford, Chauncy, Boylston, Essex and Kingston

streets, Otis Place, Winthrop Place and Fort Hill were occupied by

dwelling houses. Fort Hill, which rose about twenty-five or thirty

feet above Pearl street, was cut down in 1865, and High street

extended across it. Pemberton hill, the residence of Gardner Greene,

was cut down in 1835 to its present level, and Pemberton Square laid

out for houses. The estate covered by Pemberton hill was a famous

historic estate. It was occupied by Sir Harry Vane in 1636, by Rev.

John Cotton and his son Seaborn, John Hull, Wm. Vassall, Madame

Hayley, the society leader in Boston, Jonathan Mason, and Gardner

Green. The house of Mr. Green, which was taken down in 1835, was

built by Mr. Vassall in 1760. When the hill was levelled, a rare tree

called the Gingko, brought from China, was removed to the Common,

slips from which are now standing on the grounds of Jason W. Mixter

and B. F. Mellor in Plymouth.

When the city government decided to remove the hill Patrick T.

Jackson, in behalf of the city, made a contract with Asa G. Sheldon

of Wilmington to perform the work and fill the flats north of

Causeway street. Mr. Sheldon moved the Gingko tree to a spot on the

Common near the Beacon street mall on a stone dray drawn by oxen,

driven by Waterman Brown of Woburn.

Washington street, once called the Neck, was until 1786 the only way

in and out of Boston. South Boston, then a part of Dorchester, could

only be reached by the way of Roxbury; and Cambridge could not be

reached except by ferry, only by going through Roxbury and Brookline.

The Charles River Bridge Company was incorporated March 9, 1785, and

built the old Charlestown bridge, which was opened June 17, 1786.

This bridge furnished a new and convenient route to Cambridge. The

West Boston Bridge Company was incorporated March 9, 1792, and built

the bridge extending from Cambridge street, which was opened November

23, 1793. These two bridges continued as toll bridges until January

30, 1858. Dorchester Neck, now known as South Boston, was annexed to

Boston, March 6, 1804, then having only ten families, and on the same

date the South Bridge Co. was incorporated. The Dover street bridge

was built by that company, and opened Oct. 1, 1805, and was sold to

the city April 19, 1832, and made free, tolls having been charged

up to that time. Canal bridge now Craigie’s Bridge, a toll bridge,

leading to East Cambridge, was built by a company incorporated Feb.

27, 1807, and after its purchase by the state, was made free January

30, 1858. On the 14th of June, 1814, Isaac P. Davis, Uriah Cotting

and Wm. Brown, and their associates, were incorporated as the Boston

and Roxbury Mill Corporation, who built the mill dam leading from

Beacon street to Brookline, over which a road was opened July 2,

1821. This was a toll road, and during my college life the toll

gate was located a little east of Arlington street, and tolls were

collected until it was laid out as a highway, Dec. 7, 1868. The

Boston Free Bridge Corporation was incorporated March 4, 1826, and

built the South Boston Bridge, which crossed Fort Point Channel at

Sea street, and was bought by the city September 16, 1828, and called

Federal street bridge. The Warren Bridge Corporation was incorporated

March 11, 1828, and opened Dec. 25, in that year. It was assumed by

the state in 1833, and made free in 1858.

Between the toll gate on the Mill Dam and Brookline there were no

houses, and what is now called the Back Bay extended from the Mill

Dam to Washington street. In this connection the statement may be

interesting that in 1830 the pasturage of cows on the Common was for

the first time forbidden by a city ordinance.

When I was ten years old, my great uncle, Isaac P. Davis, who was

born in 1771, and who as one of the corporators of the Mill Dam, was

familiar with that neighborhood, took me one day down to the corner

of Boylston street and Charles street, and said to me, William,

here was the original bank of Charles River, and on this spot the

British embarked for Charlestown on the morning of the battle of

Bunker Hill. I was also told by one of the building committee of

Trinity church, that in driving piles to support the foundation,

the bed of an old channel was found where hard bottom could not be

reached, and the expedient was adopted of clearing away the earth

between the piles several feet down and filling the space with

cement, thus holding them from the top instead of supporting them

at the bottom. On this foundation, containing either five thousand

piles at a cost of $7 each, or seven thousand at a cost of $5, I have

forgotten which, the structure stands without a crack, to show any

settling. If an X ray could penetrate the sub-surface of the Back

Bay, it would disclose thousands of piles with a composite between,

of old hats, bonnets, shoes, hoop skirts and tomato cans on which

stand the domiciles of wealth and fashion. Perhaps, however, such a

foundation is as genuine and real as that on which stands fashion

itself. In my youth the South Bay, east of Washington street, was

open to the harbor through Fort Point channel, only obstructed by

the Dover street, and the old South Boston bridges. At that time the

yards of the houses in Purchase street extended to the water, and

Atlantic Avenue, north of Dewey Square, was built along the harbor

margin. Thus within my recollection, there have been added between

the Mill Dam and Washington street, Boylston street, Huntington,

Columbus, Atlantic, Shawmut and Harrison avenues, all built where

once was water, and adding more than eight hundred acres of made land

to the old peninsula of Boston, which contained only six hundred

and ninety. Until 1852 the Commonwealth owned 2,453,730 square

feet of land in the Back Bay, which in that year it began to have

filled with the view of selling it. At that time it was estimated

that the land was worth, less the cost of filling, $906,516.00.

The conservatism of this estimate is shown by the fact that in 1872

$3,551,514 had been received from sales, or $2,044,294 taking out

the cost of filling, and 500,000 square feet remained unsold, valued

at $750,000, leaving a profit to the Commonwealth of $1,887,178. In

view of the probably speedy and profitable sales of this land, the

question came up in the legislature of 1859, when I was a member of

the Senate, whether it would not be well to devote a part of the

proceeds of these sales to educational purposes, and petitions were

presented looking to this end, which were referred to the committee

on education, of which I was chairman. After several hearings I drew

up a report at the request of the committee, and after I submitted it

to the legislature, the daily papers paid it the unusual compliment

of printing it in full. Resolves accompanied the report, giving

$100,000 to the Museum of Natural History and Comparative Zoology

in Cambridge, fifty thousand dollars to Tufts college, and $25,000

each to Amherst and Williams colleges, and the Wilbraham academy,

and in addition a substantial amount to enlarge the school fund

of the state. Against some opposition the Resolves were passed by

both branches of the legislature, and it has always been a source

of satisfaction to me that I was in some degree instrumental in

prosecuting to a successful issue a measure so plainly conducive to

the best interests of the state.

One of the most striking changes in Boston within my time, has been

the change in the location of meeting houses from those localities

where they were once marked features, to the newer parts of the

city. While many of the meeting houses which stood sixty years ago

in Purchase street, Summer street, Hollis street, Cambridge street,

Chambers street and Hanover street, have been abandoned, and others

in Federal street, Franklin street, Summer street, Washington street

and Essex street have been replaced by new, no less than twenty-five

have been built in sections which in 1840 were covered by water. Thus

the money changers, instead of being driven out of the temple, have

driven the temples away from the haunts of trade.

In recalling these recollections of Boston, to which I have merely

glanced, it seems to me that I have witnessed its growth from youth

to age. There are other evidences of its growth than those to which

I have alluded. I was told many years ago by Edwin Rice, a resident

in East Boston, which now contains a population of thirty thousand,

that when he settled there its population did not exceed a hundred.

I recall sitting one calm summer afternoon nearly seventy years ago

on the grassy bank of Noddles Island, as East Boston was called, now

covered with a dense population, and listening to the roar of the

city across the harbor. I do not remember to have heard it before or

since. The experience was an interesting one. There was no single

distinguishable sound, but the rattle of wheels on the pavement,

the footfall of horses on the bridges, the hammer on the anvil, the

drum of a passing band, the cries of street venders, and, perhaps

the rustle of trees and the voices of boys at play, all mingled in a

continuous rumble of a busy, populous city. It has been stated that

during the battle of Waterloo the people of Brussels heard neither

the rattle of musketry, nor the booming of cannon, but both were

combined in an unbroken roar of the battle field. In recalling that

summer afternoon at East Boston, I have thought that the voices of

the past, not the voice of this man or that, performing his part in

the drama of life, but the voices of all good and great men who have

lived and died need time and distance to be blended as a harmonious

whole in the grand symphony of civilization.

In 1832 the whole of East Boston, containing 663 acres of upland and

marsh with the flats contiguous thereto and one house, was bought

by Wm. H. Sumner, Stephen White, Francis J. Oliver and others for

about $80,000, and the East Boston corporation was soon after formed.

From that time it rapidly grew, attracting a large population,

and becoming a hive of industry. Before the civil war two hundred

and thirty or more vessels had been built on its shores, with a

measurement of more than two hundred thousand tons. Ship builders

were drawn there from the shallow waters of Duxbury, the North river

and other places, among whom the chief were Samuel Hall, Donald

McKay, Daniel D. Kelly, A. & G. T. Sampson, Jackson & Ewell, Paul

Curtis, Jarvis Pratt, Brown, Bates & Delano, Robert E. Jackson,

Andrew Burnham, Brown & Lovell, Hugh R. McKay, G. & T. Boole, Wm.

Hall, Pratt & Osgood, Samuel Hall, Jr., Joseph Burke, Wm. Kelly,

Otis Tufts, Burkett & Tyler, C. F. & H. D. Gardiner; E. & H. O.

Briggs. There Donald McKay built the fleet of ships which made his

name famous. The following is, I believe, a correct list of his

vessels:

Anglo Saxon, 894 tons

Ocean Monarch, 1301 tons

Washington Irving, 751 tons

New World, 1404 tons

Moses, 700 tons

Anglo American, 704 tons

Az, 700 tons

Jenny Lind, 533 tons

Plymouth Rock, 960 tons

Helicon, 400 tons

Reindeer, 800 tons

Parliament, 998 tons

Moses Wheeler, 900 tons

Antarctic, 1116 tons

Daniel Webster, 1187 tons

Staghound, 1534 tons

Flying Cloud, 1782 tons

Staffordshire, 1817 tons

North American, 1469 tons

Sovereign of the Seas, 2421 tons

Westward Ho, 1650 tons

Bald Eagle, 1704 tons

Empress of the Seas, 2200 tons

Star of Empire, 1635 tons

Romance of the Seas, 1500 tons

Challenger, 1400 tons

Lightning, 2083 tons

Great Republic, 4556 tons

Champion of the Seas, 2447 tons

James Baines, 2526 tons

Commodore Perry, 1964 tons

Santa Claus, 1256 tons

Benin, 692 tons

Blanche Moore, 1787 tons

Japan, 1964 tons

Adriatic, 1327 tons

Mastiff, 1030 tons

Zephyr, 1184 tons

Defender, 1413 tons

Donald McKay, 2594 tons

Abbott Lawrence, 1497 tons

Amos Lawrence, 1396 tons

Minnehaha, 1695 tons

Harry Hill, 568 tons

Baltic, 1720 tons

L Z, 897 tons

The total tonnage of the above, forty-six ships, was 67,041,

averaging 1,457. The greatest achievements of these vessels were the

passage of the Flying Cloud, Capt. Cressey, from New York to San

Francisco in 89 days, and the run by the Sovereign of the Seas of 430

geographical miles in 24 hours.

Some of the customs prevailing in my youth and early manhood may be

as interesting as the topographical changes in Boston. There was

no day police established in Boston until 1854, and old Constable

Derastus Clapp stationed in and about State street, was the only

officer ever seen. In the above year a police force, under the

direction of a chief, was established, but not uniformed until 1856.

I remember that the newspapers on a day after the 4th of July,

commented with pride on the quiet and peaceful dispersion of the

crowd on the Common, witnessing the fireworks the evening before,

without a police officer to keep them in order. There were only

night watchmen with their rattles who cried the hour with “All is

well.” They wore in cool weather plaid camlet cloaks, and as there

was a city ordinance forbidding smoking in the streets, which by the

way has never been repealed, I have many a time when meeting them

concealed my cigar until they were out of sight. My readers may not

be aware that a by-law was adopted in Plymouth in 1831, which is

still in force, forbidding smoking in any street, lane or public

square, or on any wharf in the town.

Ringing the bell at various hours during the day and evening for the

convenience of the inhabitants, has so far as Plymouth is concerned,

been confined to the town sexton. Since, however, the ringing has

been detached from the duties of a sexton proper, who was an officer

of the church, the name sexton in our town is now given to the bell

ringer, who continues to be chosen by the town every year, though he

has now no connection with the church. The first mention of a sexton

in the town records is under date of 1712, when Eleazer Rogers was

chosen “to ring the bell, sweep the meeting house, keep the doors and

windows of said meeting house shut and open for the congregation’s

use upon all occasions, and carefully look after said house as above

said.” In 1714 he was required to ring the bell at nine o’clock every

evening. From that time to this a town sexton is chosen each year,

who since the severance of the First Church from the town no longer

rings the bell for church, while each church has its own sexton for

that duty. The custom in Plymouth is to ring the Town bell as follows

at 7 a. m., 12 noon, 1 p. m. and nine p. m., all the year; 6 p. m.

when the sun sets after that hour, and on Saturdays 5 p. m., instead

of 6. This custom of bell ringing existed in Boston, as well as other

places, and I have heard it stated that the Old South Church bell was

rung as late as 1836 at 11 a. m. to announce “the grog time o’ day.”

The nine o’clock evening bell had its origin in the ancient curfew

bell, which derived from the French words, “_couvre feu_,” was rung

at an hour when the fires in houses should be covered up. It was

adopted in New England merely to indicate the hour.

There was a method in Boston of lighting the street lamps, which was

primitive. The city was divided into districts, and a lamplighter

was appointed for each district. The lamps were all oil lamps until

1834, and each lighter would start from home in the morning carrying

a ladder, a can of oil, and a filled and trimmed lamp. He would take

the old lamp out of the first lantern, putting the fresh one in its

place. He would then fill and trim the lamp he took out and go on to

the next lantern, and so on through his district. There was another

custom, so far as I know peculiar to Boston, where domestic life

was less extravagantly and luxuriously enjoyed than in New York,

Philadelphia and Baltimore. Few families kept men servants, and many

gentlemen, rather than impose the work of blacking boots on servant

girls, or have blacking in the house, fell in with a plan suggested

by the Brattle street negroes. For many years the shops on the south

side of that street were chiefly occupied by shoe blacks and negro

dealers in second hand clothing. Some of these negroes went about on

the first of January and secured lists of subscribers for their work

for the year as a milkman or an ice man would for his milk or ice.

If, for instance, he was a beginner in the industry, he would start

out early in the morning with two rods about eight feet long, and

an inch or more in diameter, and calling at the house of the first

subscriber, take his boots and stringing them by the tugs on a rod

like herrings on a stick, go the rounds of his subscribers, and the

next morning exchange the clean boots for soiled ones. A more general

employment of men servants, and finally boot black shops and stands

put an end to this custom.

Plymouth memories of an octogenarian · 第 41 / 49 章