General Wood’s entire offense consists in his having, before the war,

continually advocated our doing things which now every one in his

senses admits ought to have been done. Nine tenths of wisdom consists

of being wise in time. General Wood was wise in time. Moreover,

by twenty years of hard, practical work, he fitted himself to do

peculiarly well in this very crisis. He was our senior general in rank,

he was recognized by the best French and English military authorities

as by experience trained to play an immediate and important part in

the difficult and perilous joint work of the war. He had testified

at length and with exhaustive professional knowledge before the

congressional military committees, one year and two years prior to

our entry into the war, pointing out all the military lacks, which

experience has since shown to exist and which the War Department then

denied existed. He is to be credited with the only piece of serious

military preparedness in advance which is to our credit. In the service

of 1915, in the teeth of indifference and hostility from his superiors,

he created the Plattsburg officers’ reserve training camp, starting the

system of training camps which has enabled us to officer our draft army.

He is in splendid physical condition. Recently when in France he

was severely wounded by a shell burst, and the surgeons reported his

recovery as being more rapid than would have been the case with the

average young man of robust bodily health and vigor. He has done

excellent work in training his men at Camp Funston. He has been

unwearied in looking after the health and welfare of his men. He has

been rewarded by their loyal devotion; they have been profoundly

grieved and moved by having him suddenly taken from them. The refusal

to use his great ability and energy means a distinct subtraction from

the sum total of our military efficiency, a distinct addition to the

risk from disease and discomfort which some of our men at the front

will have to incur, and a distinct benefit to the cause of Germany.

No explanation has been given the American people for the action

concerning him. Nothing has been made public which warrants our belief

that this action was due either to professional or to patriotic

considerations.

HELP RUSSIA NOW

JUNE 20, 1918

Russia has been thrown under the iron tyranny of German militarism

and capitalism by the Bolshevists of the Lenine type. The Russian

people are slowly awakening to this bitter truth. The far-sighted, the

Russians of genuine patriotism, have long been awake, but the peasants,

who are at heart good, but who are ignorant and misled, are now

awakening also. Plenty of them, especially among the Cossacks, are well

aware that submission to Germany now means death for Russia. Plenty of

them are eager to fight and know well that only by successful war on a

grand scale can Russia now be saved and regenerated, but they must have

help and the help must be given immediately or it may be too late, and

America can best give the help.

A Russian peasant woman who can hardly write her name is here to ask

that the help be given immediately and that it be given in Siberia.

She is a remarkable character in her strength, her simplicity, her

direct straightforwardness, and her intense earnestness and entire

disinterestedness. She was a major in the Russian army until the

Russian army was betrayed and dissolved. Her peasant husband was

killed in the ranks. She served in the ranks of a regiment of men. She

commanded in a regiment of women. She has been wounded four times. She

was born in Tomsk, Siberia. She is a peasant of the best class, in

habits of thought and belief and life and sympathy. But she has a wide

outlook. She knows that America will keep her word about Siberia, just

as America kept her word about Cuba. She asks that for our own sake,

just as much as for Russia’s sake, we now send an army to Siberia,

entering through Vladivostok or Harbin, or through both. She asks us to

announce that after the war is over we guarantee to return to Russia

her country with the right for her people to decide for themselves

how they are to be governed, and that in the war we fight with and for

all the Russians who will fight against Germany for Russia, and that

we fight to the death against the Germans and against all Russians who

side with the Germans.

Siberia is in chaos. Eastern Siberia has plenty of food and contains

large elements of the population, especially Cossacks, who would

promptly join with an Allied force which they believed would, in good

faith, aid in the reconquest of Russia for the purpose of giving it

back to the Russians themselves. West of Lake Baikal is a region

dominated by a German army, some twenty thousand strong, composed of

former German prisoners of war, who are organized under the name of

the German Red Guards and who are the permanent adherents of German

autocracy, but who help the cause of Russian anarchy in order to

conquer Russia for the German autocracy. West of these again a stretch

of country, which includes the passes of the Ural Mountains, is held

by the splendid Czechs, who, by the way, must at the end of this

war be rewarded by seeing an independent Czech-Slovak commonwealth

established, just as there must also be a great Jugo-Slav commonwealth.

At once there should be in East Siberia an American army of say thirty

thousand men with a Japanese army of the same size and a British

imperial army of as nearly the same size as possible. If there was

difficulty as to the command of the Allied forces, borrow some man of

great reputation, Joffre, for instance, from France. Let the woman

major above spoken of and other Russian friends of the peasants and of

a Russian republic go in advance to make clear that the Allied army

comes only to restore Russia to the Russians. Let all Russians who

join be paid by the United States on the same scale as our own troops,

and if necessary let the United States guarantee the payment of the

Japanese. Move against the German Red Guards as quickly as possible

and then push instantly to join the heroic Czechs in the Urals. Let

the railroads be organized back of the army by our best railroad men

and let them carry immediately behind the army immense quantities of

clothing, boots, and farm machinery. Siberia has food and it will

furnish hundreds of thousands of soldiers who will rally around such

an Allied army as a nucleus. Before this army reached the Urals, the

Germans would have to prepare to meet it and their pressure on the

Western front would thereby be relieved.

Russia is at this moment lost, so that no change in Russia can make

things worse for the Allies than they now are. We ought to have acted

with energy and intelligence on her behalf a year ago. Let us at least

act now, for no possible action can be worse than our inaction. She

does not need talk and envoys to study the situation. She needs an

army to serve as a nucleus around which she can create her own immense

armies. The above plan is better than none. If our Government can

devise a better, let them do so, but let us act at once.

AN AMERICAN FOURTH OF JULY

JUNE 23, 1918

It is announced that on the Fourth of July the celebration is to be

by race groups--that is, by Scandinavians, Slavs, Germans, Italians,

and so forth. In sport organizations it may be necessary to have such

a kind of divided celebration in some places, but I most emphatically

protest against such a type of celebration being general, and I doubt

whether it is advisable to have it anywhere. On the contrary, I believe

that we should make the Fourth of July a genuine Americanization day,

and should use it to teach the prime lesson of Americanism, which is

that there is no room in the country for the perpetuation of separate

race groups or racial divisions; that we must all be Americans and

nothing but Americans, and that therefore on the Fourth of July we

should all get together simply as Americans and celebrate the day as

such without regard to our several racial origins.

At two thirds of the places where I have made speeches on Americanism

(and these speeches have at least been free from any pussy-footing on

Americanism), I have been introduced by straight Americans who were

in whole or in part of German blood. At Milwaukee, for example, I was

introduced by August Vogel, who has three sons already in the army and

a fourth who will enter this summer. At Martinsville, Indiana, I was

introduced by the mayor, George F. Schmidt, who has two sons in the

army. One of the sons, Wayne Schmidt, was the catcher of the University

of Indiana baseball nine. He was in the same regiment with my two

sons, Ted and Archie, and like Archie has been severely wounded. Mayor

Schmidt writes me:

We are proud of Wayne and hope that his wounds will soon heal and that

he may get back to his regiment and continue to serve his country.

There is nothing fifty-fifty in this boy’s blood or any of his kin.

His greatest ambition is to lead a company up the streets of Berlin.

This speaks the true American!

I also have German blood in my veins. We Vogels and Schmidts and

Roosevelts intend to celebrate the Fourth of July with all our fellow

Americans, without regard to whether they are of German, English or

Irish, French, Scandinavian, Spanish, or Italian blood. Unless they

are Americans and nothing else, they are out of place at a Fourth of

July celebration, and if they are straight Americans, absolutely loyal

to America, and resolutely bent on putting this war through until

it is crowned by the peace of complete victory, then we are their

brothers, their fellow Americans, and we decline to permit any lines of

separation between us and them.

HOW NOT TO ADJOURN POLITICS

JUNE 25, 1918

In the current North American Review and its supplemental War Weekly

there are two strong and deeply patriotic articles on the President’s

recent announcement that politics is to be adjourned. When contrasted

with the injection of politics by the President into the senatorial

contests in Wisconsin and Michigan, never before in any great crisis in

this country has there been such complete subordination of patriotism

to politics as by this Administration during this war. Witness the

activities of the organization under Messrs. Burleson and Creel and the

working alliance between the Administration and the Hearst newspapers,

while Vice-President Marshall and Secretary McAdoo give the signal for

frank partisanship of an extreme type in their public speeches. The

various activities are, of course, co-related and directed toward the

same end.

In Wisconsin the President interfered by a personal appeal for the

Democratic senatorial candidate against the Republican. He based his

appeal on certain alleged positions taken by the Republican candidate,

Mr. Lenroot, during the two years and a half preceding our entry into

the war, which positions, he asserted, did not meet the “acid test” of

patriotism. The President made the conduct of our public men during

the two years and a half prior to the war the test by which they are

to be judged, and where he himself applies this test to others he must

himself be judged by it.

His supporters make the plea that to call attention to the President’s

record during these two and a half years is to cry over spilt milk. But

the President’s attack on Lenroot was a square repudiation of this

plea when it applied to anybody except himself. In reality the “acid

test” of patriotism during these two and a half years is to be found

in the use of phrases like “too proud to fight” and “peace without

victory” and the refusal to act instead of merely talking after the

sinking of the Lusitania; in the fatuous refusal to prepare and in the

insistence on preserving an ignoble neutrality between right and wrong

between those who were fighting to make the world safe for democracy

and liberty and those who were fighting to overthrow both. Tried by the

test of past conduct which the President applied to Mr. Lenroot, he is

himself found wanting. Mr. Lenroot spilled a teaspoonful of milk, but

Mr. Wilson spilled a bucketful and he must not call attention to the

teaspoon and expect to escape having attention called to the bucket.

The President has now personally requested Mr. Henry Ford to come

forward as his personal candidate for the Senate in Michigan. This

action cannot be reconciled either with the President’s statement that

politics must be adjourned or with the reasons he alleged for opposing

Mr. Lenroot. No man was a more intense pacifist, no man struggled

harder against preparedness, no man was more eagerly hailed as an

ally by the pro-Germans than Mr. Ford during the two and a half years

before we did our duty and entered the war. He is not a Republican;

he is not a Democrat. He supported Mr. Wilson on the “he kept us out

of war” issue. Mr. Wilson can only desire his election on grounds of

personal politics, as Mr. Wilson wishes as associates not strong men,

but servants, and from the servants he demands servility even more

than service. I have not the slightest political feeling when politics

comes into hostile contact with patriotism and Americanism. There is no

public servant whom during the past year I have supported more heartily

than the Democratic Senator, Chamberlain. I oppose Mr. Ford, because

in the great crisis I feel that his election would be a calamity from

the standpoint of far-sighted and patriotic Americanism. I would oppose

him if he had been nominated by the Republican Party. I oppose him in

precisely the same spirit now that he has been nominated on personal

grounds by Mr. Wilson.

HATS OFF TO THE INTERNATIONAL TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION

JUNE 27, 1918

The published reports of the International Typographical Union,

issued from Indianapolis, make a very remarkable showing and put that

organization high on the honor roll of America for the Great War.

Forty-one hundred journeymen members of the union and seven hundred

apprentices are in the military and naval forces of the United States

and Canada. Seventy-five members have already paid with their lives

for their devotion to their country. The union has paid $22,000

mortuary benefits to the widows, orphans, and mothers of these men.

The union, through its executive council, has invested $90,000 in the

Liberty loans, and subordinate local unions and individual members have

invested $3,000,000 in the Liberty loans.

These are war-time activities. During the same period the International

Typographical Union has continued all its ordinary benefit works. It

has paid over $350,000 to fifteen hundred old-age pensioners, over

$300,000 in mortuary benefits, and $170,000 to the Union Printers’

Home at Colorado Springs. Every dollar has been paid by members of the

organization in the form of regular dues and assessments. The union

neither solicits nor accepts contributions to its benefit funds.

During the same period the union has expended only $1200 for strike

expenses. The union acts in thoroughgoing patriotic fashion on the

conviction that there should be no strikes or lockouts during the

war. Its officers regard themselves as volunteers in the army for the

preservation of industrial peace, at least for the duration of the

war, and I hope for long after the war. Such conduct offers a striking

contrast to the action of certain corporations which during this war

have refused to permit their employees to organize. Labor has as much

right as capital to organize. It is tyranny to forbid the exercise

of this right, just as it is tyranny to misuse the power acquired by

organization. The people of the United States do not believe in tyranny

and do believe in coöperation.

The International Typographical Union has offered an admirable

example of Americanism and patriotism. Its attitude is typical of the

attitude of organized labor generally. Hats off to the International

Typographical Union! And hats off to the working-men and working-women

of the United States!

THE PERFORMANCE OF A GREAT PUBLIC DUTY

JULY 3, 1918

It is announced from Washington that the President has been converted

to the need of universal military training of our young men, as a

permanent policy. This is excellent. If this policy is forthwith

incorporated into our laws, it will represent an immense national

advance. In the first place, it will guarantee us against a repetition

of the humiliating experiences of the last four years, when our

helpless refusal to prepare invited Germany’s attack upon us and then

forced us to rely entirely upon our allies to protect us from that

attack while for over a year we slowly made ready to defend ourselves.

In the next place, it will immeasurably increase the moral and physical

efficiency of the young men who are trained and fit them both to do

better for themselves and to perform in better fashion the tasks of

American citizenship. Finally it is essential that the policy should

be adopted now while we are at war and therefore while our people are

awake to the needs of the situation. As soon as peace comes, there

will be a revival of the sinister agitation of the pro-German or other

anti-American leaders and of the silly clamor of the pacifists, all

of whom will with brazen folly again reiterate that preparedness ends

with war, and that, anyhow, all war can be averted by signing scraps

of paper. The adoption at once of the policy of obligatory universal

military training will be the performance of a great public duty.

For three years the foremost advocates of this policy have pointed

out that it can advantageously be combined with a certain amount of

industrial training. It is earnestly to be hoped that this element of

industrial training will be incorporated in the law. Of course, in such

case the length of service with the colors in the field, aside from

preliminary training in the higher school grades, ought to be a year,

so as to avoid superficiality. Credit should be given the graduates of

certain scholastic institutions or to individuals who speedily attain

a high degree of proficiency, and for them the time of service could

be shortened. All officers or other candidates for officers’ training

schools would be chosen from among the best of the men who had gone

through the training, without regard to anything except their fitness.

This would represent the embodiment in our army of the democratic

principle which insists upon an equal chance for all, equal justice for

all, and the need for leadership, and therefore for special rewards for

leadership. The industrial training could be so shaped as to emphasize

the need that hard workers who are efficient should become in a real

sense partners in industry, and that insistence upon efficiency should

be accompanied by a fair division of the rewards of efficiency, and by

insistence that the work should be made healthful and interesting, so

that its faithful performance would be a matter of pride and pleasure.

At this moment our training camps are huge universities, huge

laboratories of fine American citizenship. Let us make them permanent

institutions. They develop both power of initiative and power of

obedience. They inculcate self-reliance and self-respect. They also

inculcate respect for others and readiness for discipline, which

means readiness to use our collective power in such shape as to make

us threefold more efficient than we have been. To make these camps

permanent training schools for all our young men would mean the

greatest boon this Nation could receive.

REPEAL THE CHARTER OF THE GERMAN-AMERICAN ALLIANCE

JULY 11, 1918

The United States Senate has struck an effective blow against the

Hun within our gates by unanimously voting to repeal the charter of

the German-American Alliance. It is earnestly to be hoped that the

House will at once follow suit with like unanimity. The Alliance has

been thoroughly mischievous in its activities. It has acted in the

interest of Germany and against the interest of America. It has tried

to perpetuate Germanism as a separate nationality with a separate

language in the United States; it has attacked our allies; it has

encouraged disloyalty; it was decorated by the Kaiser for its services

to Germany. It has endeavored to prostitute our politics to German

needs. I have personally had the honor of being specially singled out

by it for attack. It received money from the Brewers’ Association for

the campaign against prohibition.

At this time, when the campaign of German frightfulness is in full

blast, when the Prussianized Germany of the Hohenzollerns is steadily

adding to its list of literally unforgivable offenses against

civilization, there is no room in this country for any organization,

great or small, which either defends Germany or is lukewarm in the

great crusade against her in which America will henceforth play

a leading part. Germany has recently scored another victory for

frightfulness by sinking a Canadian hospital ship without warning and

drowning two hundred persons, including women nurses. The ship was a

mercy vessel, not a warship, and was so distinctly marked that it was

impossible to mistake it. The attack upon it was sheer murder. Yet the

German people tolerate, applaud, and approve the action of the German

Government in this continuous and methodically organized campaign of

murder, rape, and outrage.

The most complete exposure of Germany’s infamous purpose in forcing

this dreadful war upon the world is contained in the pamphlet written

by the leading German steel magnate, Herr August Thyssen. This pamphlet

has been translated into English, has been put into the official

record by Senator Owen, of Oklahoma, has been printed in full in

the San Francisco Argonaut and Baltimore Manufacturers’ Record, and

circulated in pamphlet form by Mr. J. G. Butler, Jr., of Youngstown,

Ohio. It is accessible to everybody. Herr Thyssen has no conception

of the monstrous turpitude of the plan which he supported. His only

complaint is that he and the other German financiers were fooled by

the German Kaiser and the German Government, who promised them victory

and failed to furnish it. He proves that German capitalism was just as

responsible for the war as German militarism (which incidentally shows

the peculiar infamy of the Russian Bolshevists and American Socialists

and their allies in playing Germany’s game). He shows that Germany’s

ruthless brutality was equaled by her sordid greed. He showed that

the Hohenzollern Government, through the Emperor and the Chancellor,

deliberately planned the war over a year and a half before it broke

out, and at that time and on several occasions gathered the leading

business men of Germany, informed them of the plans, and got their

support by holding out the war as one of sheer plunder. The other

nations were to be attacked simply in order to rob them naked. Herr

Thyssen himself was promised thirty thousand acres in Australia. The

Emperor particularly dwelt on the conquest of India, saying that the

English allowed the vast Indian revenue to be used for and by the

Indians themselves, but that Germany after her conquest would turn the

whole “Golden Stream into the Fatherland.” There could be no finer

tribute to England when compared with Germany than that which is thus

furnished by the Emperor.

In point of international morality the Germany of the Hohenzollerns has

become the wild beast of the nations. Whoever directly or indirectly

works for her or against our allies or who is merely lukewarm in the

war is an enemy of this country, and an enemy of all mankind.

EVERY MAN HAS A RIGHT TO ONE COUNTRY

JULY 15, 1918

Every man ought to love his country. If he does not love his country

and is not eager to serve her, he is a worthless creature and should

be contemptuously thrown out of the country when possible, and at any

rate debarred from all rights of citizenship in the country. He is only

entitled to one country. If he claims loyalty to two countries, he is

necessarily a traitor to at least one country. If he claims to be loyal

to both Germany and America, he is necessarily a traitor to America. No

man can be a good American now unless he is an enemy of Germany and

Germany’s allies and a stanch supporter of America’s allies.

Roosevelt in the Kansas City Star: War-time Editorials · 第 12 / 20 段