CHAPTER XVI.

_Do Birds Return to Their Same Homes?_

“Do birds return to their same homes, year after year?” This is a

question that has been put to me more than any one along the bird line,

and it is usually followed by: “How do you know?” Then I have had to

take father’s advice, “drop it,” and talk about the weather or some

other side line. For while I was sure of this in my own mind, yet I had

no proof.

On August 5th, 1909, a wild black duck lit with my ducks in the north

pond. I started cozening around her, not by me going closer to her, but

by letting her come closer to me. Finally she was eating out of the

long-handled spoon that I had previously used for throwing little feed

over to her. The spoon, of course, was on the ground, gradually being

drawn towards me until it came over my left hand that was lying flat on

the ground, and on September 10th of the same year this duck actually

ate out of my hand. We named her Katie. In a few months Katie got so

tame she would follow us in the barn where we went after the feed. So I

scraped around in my hunting-case drawer and found a piece of sheet

aluminum about three-quarters of an inch wide and one and a half inches

long; I then took my sweetheart’s best pair of scissors, and with the

pointed blade I managed to scratch my post office address on it. Then I

caught Katie and wrapped it around one of her hind legs. She disappeared

on December 10th, and in January I received the following letter:

ANDERSON,

SOUTH CAROLINA,

January 17th, 1910.

Box 48,

Kingsville, Ontario.

Dear Sir,—

On Friday evening, January the 14th, I was hunting on Rocky River,

near this city. I killed a wild duck with a band on his leg, marked

Box 48, Kingsville, Ontario. I suppose whoever sent him out wanted

to hear from him, so I am writing to let you know where he came to

his end. He was a very fine specimen. I must commend him for his

judgment, for he came to the best County in the best State in

America. If you will let me hear from you I will return the band I

took from his leg. So hoping you will send me his pedigree I will

close until I hear from you. Send me your address in full.

Very respectfully,

W. E. BRAY.

[Illustration:

KATIE FEEDING OUT OF MY HAND]

I at once wrote Mr. Bray and he kindly returned the tag, which is the

centre one in the photograph of my collection of tags. Mr. Bray made two

distinct mistakes; one was when he called Katie “him” and another,

equally as big, was when he stated that the duck came to the best spot

in America, for the fact is that Essex County, Ontario, this duck’s

summer home, is the best spot on this beautiful earth; this, of course,

will include all of North America.

In 1910 and 1911 I was so busy I didn’t take the pleasure of tagging any

more, but in the spring of 1912 I hatched four young mallard. No, I

didn’t hatch them; I stole the eggs from a black duck that had paired

off with a gray, green-headed mallard drake and set them under a

domestic fowl; a few days after they were hatched they accepted me as

their step-father, and this old hen and I succeeded in raising four. I

always fed them in one spot on the brick wall that surrounded the pond.

The fish got so they came regularly for the bits that the ducks pushed

overboard; as I would tap the tin to call the ducks, I also called the

fishes. I was compelled to believe this, for before I would drop a bit

of food, the fishes would be right there. They were what we call

bull-heads, a little, miniature cat-fish, about six inches long. To see

them with their whiskers up above the water all along the wall was quite

interesting, especially when I would go to the opposite side of the pond

from where I usually fed them, and tap the tin. This makes me think of

the Irishman who was asked the question “Do fish sleep?” He replied, “I

never caught any that way.”

At any rate the little ducks got all they wanted to eat, for they grew

like mushrooms. I took a day off for no other reason than to go to

Detroit and buy sheet aluminum and a set of stencils, and when these

four ducks had their growth, each was presented with a leg-band stamped

with the following inscription: “Write box 48, Kingsville, Ontario.”

These four ducks’ names were Polly, Delilah, Susan and Helen. On or

about December 5th they left, and on the following day Dr. Rutherford,

Chatham, Ontario, shot Helen at Mitchell Bay, Lake St. Clair, Ontario.

Well, I looked to hear from the other three, all winter. But to my

delight, on March 10th, 1913, Polly came home, and on the 18th, Delilah

came; and although badly crippled in the wing and leg, Susan came

squawking down out of the heavens on March 30th. I caught each one and

examined their tags; and for the next three months I did all I could to

induce people to ask me how I knew that birds returned to their same

homes, for I had double proof: First, these ducks were mulattoes; they

had a black duck’s breast, and a grey duck’s wings. But the climax was

the tags that I put on their legs.

That summer, 1913, Polly and Delilah each raised a family, but Susan

remained in the hospital nearly all summer. That fall they all three

migrated again, and Noah Smith of Paris, Kentucky, shot Susan, February

27th, 1914.

On March 14th, Polly came home. On March 21st Delilah came; she was

accompanied by a Yankee sweetheart and this spot seemed too good to be

real for him. When Delilah would come to me, he would scour the heavens

above, but finally he believed what she said and he, too, came to me for

food.

That summer Delilah raised her family, but Polly came home May 20th

without any, and both ducks migrated again that fall.

On March 13th, 1915, Delilah came home, and on the 16th Polly came, but

Polly had had a narrow escape, as part of her beak was shot off. The

sight was pitiful. With a fragment of her beak hanging down she could

hardly eat, so I mixed up some corn-meal and put it in piles for her.

Finally I reached out and grabbed the opportunity, then with the

scissors in the other hand I clipped the dead fragment of her beak off,

and in a few days she appeared to eat quite naturally. Later on I caught

the two sisters, put them in a twine sack, took them to town, stood them

on a table and stroked them until they became quite contented; then I

stepped back and the photographer took the photograph which is shown.

[Illustration:

POLLY AND DELILAH

Wild ducks spending their third spring at my home. Notice where the

piece has been shot off Polly’s beak.]

My boy said Polly got her beak a little too far ahead. At any rate she

appeared to think that was a close enough call for her, and the next

winter she did not migrate, but stayed here with our domestic fowls, and

she was shot by a wild goose hunter in April, 1916. But Delilah

continued to migrate and returned for the sixth time on March 25th,

1918. That summer she raised a family of twelve, which is, by the way,

the largest family of mallards I have ever known to grow to maturity.

The last I have any positive proof of seeing her was in September, 1918.

During the six years she brought to my home five families, two eights,

two nines, and a twelve. In 1917 she came home without a family.

Providing all of her descendents multiply as she did, how many ducks

have you got in six years? Surely this is worth thinking over, and when

we see that it runs up into the thousands we cannot help but be

encouraged, and our confidence increased in His lovable, truthful

promise to us, His children; for He says “Let the mother go that it may

be well with thee, and that thou mayest prolong thy days.” Who could ask

for a plainer fulfilment of His promises?

Now in case the reader might think that possibly I am mistaken in the

ducks, and this was not the same bird, I will say that outside of other

proofs of her being the same duck (such as coming when we would call

her, and now and then eating from our hands, her peculiar marking, and

so forth), we caught her each year and examined the tag. In the spring

of 1917, after she had returned the fifth time, Mrs. Miner and I caught

her and gave her a new tag, as the old one was so badly worn.

Now before I go farther I want you to stop and think. Remember, these

are just wild ducks that we are apt to think know so little. Yet the

fact is, these birds have shied out around thousands of hunters who are

hidden in the ambush with all kinds of decoys to assist them. Yet these

ducks have outwitted them all, year after year. Then when they return

they will almost eat from my hand the first day they arrive, when if

they had allowed themselves to have ventured within two hundred feet of

the hunters’ decoys it would have been almost sure death to them. Can

you blame me for enjoying nature study? Do you wonder that I have hung

up the gun and am trying in my A, B, C fashion to tell you these

unpolished facts? Yet I doubt if the best writers on earth could give

you a taste of this grateful feeling in having your pets return to you

year after year for food and protection; really it almost makes you feel

you were personally present when He said, “How often would I have

gathered thee as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings.”

Another thing that interests me: These ducks always leave here in

flocks, and return singly, except those that have doubled by bringing

mates. I have never seen two with tags on return together. In 1914 I

tagged twelve. One was shot at Gueydan, Louisiana and one at Cooksville,

Tennessee. In the spring of 1915, day after day added to the number

until on March 28th there were six sitting on the brick wall surrounding

the pond with bright aluminum tags on their legs. In the fall of 1915 I

tagged fifty-three, and in the spring of 1916 nearly half of them

returned. In the fall of 1916 I caught and tagged fifty-four, and in

catching these fifty-four I caught twenty-three that had been tagged

previously.

Jack Miner and the Birds, and Some Things I Know about Nature · 第 16 / 36 章