THREE-WAY TUNNELS.

Mr. T.R. Cramton, who at the Southampton meeting of the British

Association suggested a method of tunneling which, under certain

conditions, seems of excellent promise, brought forward a suggestion at

Southport for the construction of three-way tunnels. Now, the undoubted

aim of all engineers is economy of construction and the securing of

permanent advantages. Mr. Crampton maintains that the suggested system

will give these, that three tunnels of, say, 17 ft. diameter, can be

constructed cheaper than one of 30 ft. diameter. After describing Sir J.

C. Hawkshaw's scheme for the ventilation of long tunnels, the three-way

scheme was discussed. Three separate tunnels of 17 ft. diameter each,

or 227 ft. area, are to be connected by large passages about midway

of their length. These passages are without valves; in fact, free air

passages. Between these midway connections and the ends, say again

midway between, is formed a branch at right angles either above or below

with separate openings from the branch into the other tunnels, such

openings being provided with doors or valves quite clear of the main

tunnel, any two of which may be closed, thus separating at this point

the corresponding tunnels from the third. The branch is to be led to any

convenient position where the exhustion apparatus can be placed. If two

of the tunnels are left open to this branch, and the third one shut off

from it by closing the doors, the vitiated air will be drawn from the

two working tunnels, through the connecting branch, while fresh air will

be partly sucked down the vertical shafts through their open ends and

partly at the center tunnel, which is supplied by forcing air down the

vertical shaft in communication with it, a stop or door being placed

just outside of the bottom of the shaft so as to compel the air to flow

to the center of the tunnel. It will be observed that no trains are

running in this air tunnel so long as it is so used; there are similar

doors for the working tunnel, but they are kept open, unless either of

them is required to be made into an air tunnel, so that the passing

trains run no risk of running into the doors. By means of the doors

above mentioned, any one of the three tunnels can be used as a fresh-air

tunnel, in which the men doing the repairs to the road would be clear of

the traffic, while the other two are used for the traffic, as well as

outlets for the mixed impure gas and air. If a breakdown of a train

occurs in any one tunnel, that tunnel can at once be converted into a

fresh-air one, while its traffic is transferred to the one previously

used for air, thereby avoiding delay. The system described for splitting

the air and drawing off the noxious gases is very similar to that

described by Mr. Hawkshaw at Southampton. The valves and other details

being added, to make the system applicable to three tunnels, it will

be obvious that other modes of ventilation may be adopted. In order to

reduce the number of men working in the tunnel it is proposed, if found

practicable, not to adopt the ordinary ballast and cross sleepers, but

to substitute the longitudinal timber system, the timbers to be secured

to brickwork or concrete, forming a part of the tunnel lining, placing

efficient elastic material between the foundation and longitudinals for

their whole area, also between the rails and sleepers. An open drain is

formed between the rails; by this plan any water accumulating flows over

smooth surfaces through small channels into a drain, the tunnel on each

side being dry. The saving of labor in repairs, if this system can be

employed, is so evident that a large amount of money might be expended

in endeavoring to discover a suitable elastic material for the purpose.

There are data on many long viaducts sufficient to justify experiments

being made on the subject, and it is not unreasonable to expect that

suitable material may be met with. In very long tunnels nothing should

be omitted tending to reduce the number of men working in them. The

opinion was expressed that in tunnels passing through solid materials,

and proper foundations being made for the longitudinals to rest upon,

with good elastic material placed between the rails and sleepers and

foundations, one-half of the men employed on the ordinary cross sleeper

road resting on ballast would be saved, more particularly as the repairs

are effected in pure air free from the traffic as explained. The

estimate as to the cost of this system was upon the dimensions given by

Sir J. Hawkshaw, and the following gives the comparison:

The quantity of excavation and brickwork or concrete in each case will

be as follows: Single tunnel: 30 ft. diameter lining, 3 ft. thick, with

the brickwork forming the air passage = to 36.5 cubic yards per yard

forward. Excavation to outside of brickwork 36 ft. diameter = to 113

cubic yards per yard forward. Three tunnels 17 ft. diameter and 18 in.

brickwork. Brickwork lining for three tunnels = 24.5 cubic yards per

yard forward. Excavation outside brickwork for the same 105 cubic yards

per yard forward. It is assumed that three 17 ft. tunnels are stronger,

more conveniently formed, and involve less risks in construction than

one of 30 ft. diameter; at the same time there is no difficulty in

making the latter. The above shows the saving in the three tunnels of

23 per cent. in brickwork, and about 7 per cent. of earthwork, compared

with one of 30 ft. With regard to ventilation, it is well known that the

power required to force air along passages is practically as the cube of

the velocity; and as the area of the air passages in the single tunnel

is 106 ft. with speed ten miles per hour, and that of one of the 17 ft.

diameter is 227 ft., or rather more than double, giving only five miles

per hour velocity, it follows that the power for this portion would be

eight times less. That for the working tunnels would be practically the

same, the velocities being nearly alike in both cases, which would be

about 2½ miles per hour--the 30 ft. having an area of 470 ft., the

two single ones together about 450 ft. Upon the face of it the system

deserves a trial. A full consideration of the scheme by engineers

preparing plans for new tunnels would no doubt throw further light

upon the subject and be of interest wherever such work is

contemplated.--_Contract Journal_.

* * * * *

Scientific American Supplement, No. 430, March 29, 1884 · 第 32 / 51 题