[102] This refers to the following occurrence. During the war, while

Uys was in the field, a complaint, afterwards proved to be frivolous,

was made against his wife to the nearest special magistrate for the

protection of apprentices, who issued a warrant, and she was taken

to Port Elizabeth to be tried. Upon her innocence being clearly

established she was liberated, and an action was then brought

before the circuit court against the special magistrate for false

imprisonment. The chief justice, who was the circuit judge, and before

whom the case was tried, condemned the special magistrate to pay the

costs, but these were defrayed for him out of the district treasury,

on the ground that otherwise he would be deterred from doing his legal

duty when complaints were made to him.--See Chase’s _Natal Papers_.

[103] Sir Benjamin D’Urban provisionally extended the boundary of

the colony to the Kraai river, and on the 6th of November 1835

Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Somerset, who visited the north-eastern

districts as an agent of the governor, issued a notice that Stephanus

Petrus Erasmus was to be fieldcornet of the newly annexed ward. In

September of this year one hundred and sixty families were reported to

be living on the Stormberg spruit and the Kraai river. See the D’Urban

papers in the South African Public Library. A full account of the

massacres and robberies by the Matabele will be found in my _History

of South Africa_.

[104] See his _Fifty Years of the History of the Republic in South

Africa (1795-1845)_, published in London in 1899, Volume II, pages 23

to 28.

[105] I am unable to add to or amend the accounts of these events

given by me a quarter of a century ago in my _History_, except in

one particular. The number of men and boys murdered at Umkungunhlovu

on the 6th of February 1838 (page 318, volume ii, _History of South

Africa since September 1795_) should be sixty-seven, not sixty-six,

and to the names should be added that of Pieter Retief, junior. This

is found in Mr. Boshof’s list, but not in most of those made shortly

after the event. These vary from each other, and some trouble must be

taken to verify many of the names. In a letter from Magdalena Johanna

de Wet, widow of Mr. Retief, to her brothers and sisters, dated at

Pietermaritzburg on the 7th of July 1840, published in Mr. Preller’s

work, she mentions the murder of her son Pieter Retief with his

father, and also of Abraham Greyling, her son by a former marriage, at

the same time.

[106] For the particulars see my _History of South Africa since

September 1795_, Volume II, pages 323 to 326.

[107] The difficulty of giving a reliable account of all the details

of this event is insurmountable, as it is impossible to reconcile

the narratives of those who took part in it with each other. I give

therefore only the leading features. Readers who may imagine that

every incident should be obtained by thorough research are requested

to consult the different statements given by Mr. Bird in his _Annals

of Natal_, and to believe that others consulted by me long before the

publication of that work are equally as conflicting.

End of Project Gutenberg's Willem Adriaan Van Der Stel, by George McCall Theal

Willem Adriaan Van Der Stel, and Other Historical Sketches · 第 27 / 27 段