CHAPTER XXXI

THEORIES VERSUS FACTS

PERCY planned to walk to Blue Mound to take the three-thirty train

that Saturday afternoon; but Adelaide's parents both insisted that

she would willingly drive to the station, and the grandmother

discovered that she needed a certain kind of thread which Adelaide

could then also get at the store.

"Certainly," said Adelaide, with some merriment, "I always enjoy our

departing guests to the train."

"Very well," replied Percy. "If you must go to get the thread and

will permit me to be the coachman, I shall be satisfied, for you

will be home early."

"Then we will take the colts and buckboard, and I shall be home in

less than twenty minutes after your train leaves the station."

"I think I have missed several days of your beautiful 'Indian

Summer,' because of my trip to the North," Percy remarked to Mr.

West as they sat on the broad veranda waiting for the hour of two

thirty when the colts were to be ready for the drive.

"I wish you might have been with us while Professor Barstow was

here," replied Mr. West, "not only because of the mild autumn

weather we have had, but also because Professor Barstow has some

ideas about questions of soil fertility that are very different from

those you hold. He says a young man from Washington gave a lecture

at his college down in North Carolina, in which he informed them

that the cause of infertility of soils is a poisonous substance

excreted by the plant itself, and that this can be overcome by

changing from one crop to another because the excrete of one plant,

while poisonous to that plant, will not be poisonous to other plants

of a different kind. Thus, by rotation of crops, good crops could be

grown indefinitely on the same land without the addition of plant

food. He said that the soil water alone dissolved plenty of plant

food from all soils for the production of good crops, and that the

supply of plant food will be permanently maintained, because the

plant food contained in the subsoil far below where the roots go is

being brought to the surface by the rise of the capillary moisture,

and that there is in fact a steady tendency toward an accumulation

of plant food in the surface soil. He said that it is never

necessary to apply fertilizing material to any soil for the purpose

of increasing the supply of plant food in that soil. He admitted

that applications of fertilizers sometimes produce increased crop

yields, but that the effect was due to the power of the fertilizer

to destroy the toxic substances excreted by the plants, and this is

really the principal effect of potash, phosphates, and nitrates, and

also of farm manure and green manures. Humus, he said, is one of the

very best substances for destroying these toxic excrete although

they had some other things which were as good or better than any

sore of fertilizing materials. He mentioned especially a substance

called pyrogallol, which cost $2.00 a pound, and of course it could

not be applied on a large scale; but it was as good a fertilizer as

anything, although it contains nothing but carbon, oxygen, and

hydrogen, which, as you explained to me when you were here before,

the plants secure in abundance from air and water. This information

had been secured in the laboratories at Washington by growing wheat

seedlings in water culture for twenty-day periods."

"I have already heard something of those theories," said Percy, "but

I shall be glad to have you tell me more about them. As I understand

them, we need only to rotate and cultivate and our lands should

always continue to produce bountiful crops. Is that correct?"

"I understand that is the theory," replied Mr. West, "but I know it

is not correct for my grandfather used to grow two or three times as

much wheat per acre as I can grow, and I rotate much more than he

did. In fact I can grow only ten to fifteen bushels of wheat per

acre once in ten years, whereas he grew from twenty-five to forty

bushels per acre in a five-year rotation; and I don't see that there

is any particular connection between the growing of wheat seedlings

in small pots or bottles for a few twenty-day periods and the

growing of crops in soils during successive seasons. No, I don't

take any stock in their theories. I think they are _watered, _or

perhaps I should say _hydrated, _in deference to science. But I

would like to know about this question of plant food coming up from

below. That would be a happy solution of the fertilizer problem."

"It is true," said Percy, "that soluble salts are brought to the

surface in the rise of moisture by capillarity in times of partial

drouth; and in the arid regions where the small amount of water that

falls in rain or snow leaves the soil only by evaporation, because

there is never enough to produce underdrainage, the salts tend to

accumulate at the surface. The alkali conditions in the arid or

semiarid regions of the West are thus produced. But in humid

sections where more or less of the rainfall leaves the soil as

underdrainage the regular loss by leaching is so much in excess of

the rise by capillarity that soils which are not affected by erosion

or overflow steadily decrease in fertility even under natural

conditions, with no cultivation and no removal of crops. Of course

this applies at first only to the mineral plant foods, as phosphorus

potassium, magnesium, and calcium. While mineral supplies are

abundant in the surface soil, there may be a large acumulation of

organic matter and nitrogen, especially because of the growth of

wild legumes, which are very numerous and in places very abundant,

especially on some of the virgin prairies of the West. However, as

the process of leaching proceeds there comes a time when the growth

of the native vegetation is limited because of a deficiency in some

essential mineral plant food, such as phosphorus, or the limestone

completely disappears and soil acidity develops which greatly

lessens the growth of the legumes.

"Decomposition of organic matter begins almost as soon as any part

of the plant ceases to live, and there is certain to come a time

when the rate of decomposition and loss exceeds the rate of fixation

and accumulation; and from that time on the organic matter and

nitrogen as well as the mineral plant foods continue to decrease in

the surface, until finally the natural barrens are developed, such

as are found in different sections of the World and in some places

even where the rainfall is sufficient for abundant crops."

"Yes, Sir," said Mr. West. "I know that is true. I have visited

Tennessee and I know there are some extensive areas there of

practically level upland which have always been considered too poor

to justify putting under cultivation, and they are called the

'Barrens'."

"I know about those barren lands, too," said Percy. "Our teacher of

soil fertility in college told us that a farm is more than a piece

of the earth's surface. He said if we only wanted to get a large

level tract of upland where the climate is mild and the rainfall

abundant and where all sorts of crops do well on good soil,

including the wonderful cotton crop which brings a hundred dollars

for a thousand pounds, while corn brings forty dollars for a hundred

bushels,--well, he said we could go to the Highland Rim of Tennessee

where, according to analyses reported in 1897 by the Tennessee

Experiment Station, the surface soil of the 'Barrens' contains

eighty-seven pounds of phosphorus and the subsoil sixty-one pounds

of phosphorus per acre, counting two million pounds of soil in each

case. He said, if we didn't like that we might go into the Great

Central Basin of Tennessee or the famous Blue Grass Region of

Kentucky and find land that is still extremely productive and more

valuable than ever, even after a hundred years of cultivation, and

buy land containing from three thousand to fifteen thousand pounds

of phosphorus per acre."

"I know both of those sections very well," said Mr. West. "But

doesn't it seem strange that the scientists at Washington would

teach as they do? Why doesn't the plant food accumulate in the

surface soil of those barrens? Surely they have been lying there

long enough, with no crops whatever removed, so that they ought to

have become very rich. I wish I had known about their phosphorus

content so I could have told Professor Barstow. He was quite carried

away with the Washington theory."

"You ought not for a moment call it the 'Washington' theory," said

Percy; "and neither is it promulgated by scientists, but rather by

two or three theorists who are upheld by our greatest living

optimist. Science, Sir, is a word to be spoken of always with the

greatest respect. Of course you know its meaning?"

"Yes, I know it comes from the Latin _scire, _to know."

"Then _science _means _knowledge; _it does not mean theory or

hypothesis, but absolute and positive knowledge. Is there any

uncertainty as to the instant when the next eclipse will appear? No,

none whatever. Science means knowledge, and men are scientists only

so far as they have absolute knowledge, and to that extent every

farmer is a scientist.

"Nevertheless the erroneous teaching so widely promulgated by the

federal Bureau of Soils is undoubtedly a most potent influence

against the adoption of systems of positive soil improvement in the

United States, because it is disseminated from the position of

highest authority. Other peoples have ruined other lands, but in no

other country has the powerful factor of government influence ever

been used to encourage the farmers to ruin their lands."

The Story of the Soil; from the Basis of Absolute Science and Real Life · 第 31 / 42 章