CHAPTER XV

COEDUCATION

PERCY took a lesson in turning the cream separator and after dinner

Mrs. Thornton assured him that she and her sister were greatly

disappointed that they had not been permitted to hear the discussion

concerning the use of science on the farm.

"We have never forsaken our belief that these old farms can again be

made to yield bountiful crops," she said, "as ours did for so many

years under the management of our ancestors. 'Hope springs eternal

in the human breast.' I stop with that for I do not like the rest of

the couplet. We can see that some marked progress has been made

under my husband's management, although he feels that it is very

slow work building up a run-down farm. But he has raised some fine

crops on the fields under cultivation,--as much as ten barrels of

corn to the acre, have you not, Dear?" she asked.

"Yes, fully that much, but even ten barrels per acre on one small

field is nothing compared to the great fields of corn Mr. Johnston

raises in the West. and it makes a mighty small show here on a

nine-hundred-acre farm, most of which hasn't been cropped for more

than twenty years; and even then it was given up because the negro

tenants couldn't raise corn enough to live on.

"I've talked some with the fertilizer agents, but they don't know

much about fertilizers, except what they read in the testimonials

published in the advertising booklets. I have had some good help

from the agricultural papers, but most that is written for the

papers doesn't apply to our farm, and it's so indefinite and

incomplete, that I've just spent this whole evening asking Mr.

Johnston questions; and I haven't given him a chance to answer them

all yet."

"I am sure you have not asked more questions this afternoon than I

did this forenoon," Percy remarked; "and all your answers were based

on authentic history or actual experience, while my answers were

only what I have learned from others."

"Well, if we were more ready to learn from others, it would be

better for all of us," said Mr. Thornton. "Experience is a mighty

dear teacher and, even if we finally learn the lesson, it may be too

everlasting late for us to apply it. Now we all want to learn about

that process called nitrification."

"It is an extremely interesting and important process," said Percy.

"It includes the stages or steps by which the insoluble organic

nitrogen of the soil is converted into soluble nitrate nitrogen, in

which form it become available as food for all of our agricultural

plants."

"Excepting the legumes?" asked Mr. Thornton.

"Excepting none," Percy replied. "The legume plants, like clover,

take nitrogen from the soil so far as they can secure it in

available form, and in this respect clover is not different from

corn. The respect in which it is different is the power of clover to

secure additional supplies of nitrogen from the air when the soil's

available supply becomes inadequate to meet the needs of the growing

clover. If the conditions are suitable for nitrogen-fixation, then

the growth of the legume plants need not be limited by lack of

nitrogen; whereas, nitrogen is probably the element that first

limits the growth and yield of all other crops on your common

soils."

"Now, what do you think of that, Girls? With millions of dollars'

worth of nitrogen in the air over every acre, our crops are poor

just because we don't use it. I wish you would tell me something

about the suitable conditions for nitrogen-fixation, Mr. Johnston.

You understand, Girls, that nitrogen-fixation is simply getting

nitrogen from the inexhaustible supply in the air by means of little

microscopic organisms called bacteria, which live in little balls

called tubercles attached to the roots of certain plants called

legumes, like cowpeas and clover. Corn and wheat and such crops

can't get this nitrogen. Now, Mr. Johnston is telling about

nitrification, a process which is entirely different from

nitrogen-fixation. Excuse me, Mr. Johnston, but I wanted to make

this plain to Mrs. Thornton and Miss Russell."

"I am glad you did so," Percy replied. "As I was saying,

nitrification has no connection whatever with the free nitrogen of

the air.

"All plants take their food in solution; that is, the plant food

taken from the soil must be dissolved in the soil water or moisture.

Of the essential elements of plant food, seven are taken from the

soil through the roots into the plant. These seven do not include

those of which water itself is composed. Now, these seven plant food

elements exist in the soil almost exclusively in an insoluble form.

In that condition they are not available to the plant for plant

food; and it is the business of the farmer to make this plant food

available as fast as is needed by his growing crops.

"The nitrogen of the soil exists in the organic matter; that is, in

such materials as plant roots, weeds, and stubble, that may have

been plowed under, or any kind of vegetable maker incorporated with

the soil, including all sorts of crop residues, green manures, and

the common farm fertilizers from the stables. When these organic

materials are decomposed and disintegrated to such an extent that

their structure is completely destroyed, the resulting mass of

partially decayed black organic matter is called humus. The nitrogen

of the soil is one of the constituents of this humus or other

organic matter. It is not contained in the mineral particles of the

soil. On the other hand the other six elements of plant food are

contained largely in the mineral part of the soil, as the clay,

silt, and sand. thus the iron, calcium, magnesium, and potassium,

all of which are called abundant elements, are contained in the

mineral matter, and usually in considerable amounts, while they are

found in the organic matter in very small proportion. The phosphorus

and sulfur are found in very limited quantities in most soils, but

they are present in both organic and mineral form.

"Practically the entire stock or store of all of the elements in the

soil is insoluble and consequently unavailable for the use of

growing plants; and, as I said, some of the chief plans and efforts

of the farmer should be directed to the business of making plant

food available.

"The nitrogen contained in the insoluble organic matter of the soil

is made soluble and available by the process called nitrification.

Three different kinds of bacteria are required to bring about the

complete change."

"Are these bacteria different from the nitrogen fixing bacteria?"

asked Mr. Thornton.

"Entirely different," Percy replied, "and there are three distinct

kinds, one for each of the three steps in the process.

"The first may be called ammonia bacteria. They have power to

convert organic nitrogen into ammonia nitrogen; that is, into the

compound of nitrogen and hydrogen; and this step in the process is

called ammonification.

"The other two kinds are the true nitrifying bacteria. One of them

converts the ammonia into nitrites, and the other changes the

nitrites into nitrates. These two kinds are known as the nitrite

bacteria and the nitrate bacteria.

"Technically the last two steps in the process are nitrification

proper; but, speaking generally, the term nitrification is used to

include the three steps, or both ammonification and nitrification

proper.

"Now, the nitrifying bacteria require certain conditions, otherwise

they will not perform their functions. Among these essential

conditions are the presence of moisture and free oxygen, a supply of

carbonates, certain food materials for the bacteria themselves, and

a temperature within certain limits.

"You may remember, Mr. Thornton, that more soil nitrogen is made

available for cowpeas during the summer weather than for clover

during the cooler fall and spring?"

"Yes, I remember that distinction."

"I declare," said Miss Russell, "Tom talks as though he had been

there and seen the things going on. I haven't seen you using any

microscope."

"Well, I tell you, I've mighty near seen 'em," was the reply. "Mr.

Johnston makes everything so plain that I can mighty near see what

he saw when he looked through the microscope."

"I greatly enjoyed my microscopic work," said Percy, "and still more

the work in the chemical laboratory where we finally learned to

analyze soils, to take them apart and see what they contain,--how

much nitrogen how much phosphorus, how much limestone, or how much

soil acidity, which means that limestone is needed. Then I also

enjoyed the work in the pot-culture laboratory, where we learned not

to analyze but to synthesize; that is, to put different materials

together to make a soil. Thus, we would make one soil and put in all

of the essential plant food elements except nitrogen, and another

with only phosphorus lacking, and still another with both nitrogen

and phosphorus present, and all of the other essential elements

provided, except potassium, or magnesium, or iron. These prepared

soils were put in glass jars having a hole in the bottom for

drainage, and then the same kind of seeds were planted in each jar

or pot. Some students planted corn, others oats or wheat or any kind

of farm seeds. I grew rape plants in one series of pots, and I have

a photograph with me which shows very well that all of the plant

food elements are essential.

"You see one pot contained no plant food and one was prepared with

all of the ten essential elements provided. Then the other pots

contained all but one of the necessary soil elements, as indicated

in the photograph."

"Why, I never saw anything like that," said Mrs. Thornton.

"But I have many a time," said her husband, "right here on this old

farm; I don't know what's lacking, of course, but some years I've

thought most everything was lacking. But, according to this

pot-culture test, you can't raise any crops if just one of these ten

elements is lacking, no matter how much you have of the other nine;

and it seems to make no difference which one is lacking, you don't

get any crop. Is that the fact, Mr. Johnston?"

One pot with no plant food, and one with all the essential elements

provided, and still others with but one element lacking. All planted

the same day and cared for alike.

"Yes, Sir," Percy replied. "Where all of the elements are provided,

a fine crop is produced, but in each case where a single element is

omitted that is the only difference, and in some cases the result is

worse than where no plant food is supplied. It seems to hurt the

plant worse to throw its food supply completely out of balance than

to leave it with nothing except what it draws from the meager store

in the seed planted. Of course all the pots were planted with the

same kind of seed at the same time, and they were all watered

uniformly every day."

"Those results are very striking, indeed," said Miss Russell," but I

suppose one would never see such marked differences under farm

conditions?"

"Only under unusual or abnormal conditions," Percy replied, "but the

fact is that as a very general rule our crop yields are limited

chiefly because the supply of available plant food is limited.

Sometimes the clover crop is a complete failure on untreated land,

while it lives and produces a good crop if the soil is properly

treated; and in such cases the difference developed in the field is

just as marked as in the pot-cultures. In general we may set it down

as an absolute fact that the productive power of normal land depends

primarily upon the ability of the soil to feed the crop.

"I have here a photograph of a corn field on very abnormal soil.

They had the negative at the Experiment Station and I secured a

print from it, in part because I became interested in a story

connected with this experiment field, which our professor of soil

fertility reported to us.

"This shows a field of corn growing on peaty swamp land, of which

there are several hundred thousand acres in the swamp regions of

Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin. This peaty soil is extremely rich

in humus and nitrogen, well supplied with phosphorus and other

elements, except potassium; but in this element it is extremely

deficient. This land was drained out at large expense, and produced

two or three large crops because the fresh grass roots contained

some readily available potassium; but after three or four years the

corn crop became a complete failure, as you see from the untreated

check plot on the right; while the land on the left, where potassium

was applied, produced forty-five bushels per acre the year this

photograph was taken, and with heavier treatment from sixty to

seventy-five bushels are produced."

"Seventy-five bushels would be fifteen barrels of corn per acre.

How's that, Little Wife?" asked Tom.

"It's even more wonderful than the pot culture," replied Mrs.

Thornton; "but how much did the potassium cost, Mr. Johnston."

"About three dollars an acre," replied Percy; "but of course the

land has almost no value if not treated; and as a matter of fact the

three dollars is less than half the interest on the difference in

value between this land and our ordinary corn belt land. These peaty

swamp lands are to a large extent in scattered areas, and commonly,

if a farmer owns some of this kind of land, he also owns some other

good land, perhaps adjoining the swamp; but this is not always the

case, and was not with the man in the story I mentioned. This man

lived a few miles away and his farm was practically all of this

peaty swamp land type. He heard of this experiment field and came

with his family to see it.

"As he stood looking, first at the corn on the treated and untreated

land, and then at his wife and large family of children, he broke

down and cried like a child. Later he explained to the

superintendent who was showing him the experiments, that he had put

the best of his life into that kind of land. 'The land looked rich,'

said he,--'as rich as any land I ever saw. I bought it and drained

it and built my home on a sandy knoll. The first crops were fairly

good, and we hoped for better crops; but instead they grew worse and

worse. We raised what we could on a small patch of sandy land, and

kept trying to find out what we could grow on this black bogus land.

Sometimes I helped the neighbors and got a little money, but my wife

and I and my older children have wasted twenty years on this land.

Poverty, poverty, always! How was I to know that this single

substance which you call potassium was all we needed to make this

land productive and valuable? Oh, if I had only known this twenty

years ago, before my wife had worked like a slave,--before my

children had grown almost to manhood and womanhood, in poverty and

ignorance!'"

"Why wasn't the matter investigated sooner?" asked Miss Russell.

"Why didn't the government find out what the land needed long

before?"

"I am a Yankee," said Percy. "Why have American statesmen ridden

back and forth to the national capitol through a wilderness of

depleted and abandoned farms in the eastern states for half a

century or more before the first appropriation was made for the

purpose of agricultural investigation? and why, even now, does not

this rich federal government appropriate to the agricultural

experiment station in every state a fund at least equal to the

aggregate salaries of the congressmen from the same state, this fund

to be used exclusively for the purpose of discovering and

demonstrating profitable systems of permanent agriculture on every

type of soil? Why do we as a nation expend five hundred million

dollars annually for the development of the army and navy, and only

fifteen millions for agriculture, the one industry whose ultimate

prosperity must measure the destiny of the nation?

"Moralists sometimes tell us that the fall of the Babylonian Empire,

the fall of the Egyptian Empire, of the Grecian Empire, and the

Roman Empire, were all due to the development of pride and

immorality among those peoples; whereas, we believe that

civilization tends rather toward peace, security, and higher

citizenship. Is not the chief explanation for the ultimate and

successive fall of those great empires to be found in the exhausted

or wasted agricultural resources of the country?

"The land that once flowed with milk and honey might then support a

mighty empire, with independent resources sufficient for times of

great emergencies, but now that land seems almost barren and

supports a few wandering bands of marauding Arabs and villages of

beggars.

"The power and world influence of a nation must pass away with the

passing of material resources; for poverty is helpless, and

ignorance is the inevitable result of continued poverty. Only the

prosperous can afford education or trained intelligence.

"Old land is poorer than new land. There are exceptions, but this is

the rule. The fact is known and recognized by all America.

"What does it mean? It means that the practice of the past and

present art of agriculture leads toward land ruin,--not only in

China, where famine and starvation are common, notwithstanding that

thousands and thousands of Chinese are employed constantly in saving

every particle of fertilizing material, even gathering the human

excrements from every house and by-place in village and country, as

carefully as our farmers gather honey from their hives; not only in

India where starvation's ghost is always present, where, as a rule,

there are more hungry people than the total population of the United

States; not only in Russia where famine is frequent; but, likewise

in the United States of America, the present practice of the art of

agriculture tends toward land ruin.

"Nations rise and fall; so does the productive power of vast areas

of land. Better drainage, better seed, better implements, and more

thorough tillage, all tend toward larger crops, but they also tend

toward ultimate land ruin, for the removal of larger crops only

hastens soil depletion.

"To bring about the adoption of systems of farming that will restore

our depleted Eastern and Southern soils, and that will maintain or

increase the productive power of our remaining fertile lands of the

Great Central West, where we are now producing half of the total

corn crop of the entire world, is not only the most important

material problem of the United States; but to bring this about is

worthy of, and will require, the best thought of the most

influential men of America. Without a prosperous agriculture here

there can be no permanent prosperity for our American institutions.

While some small countries can support themselves by conducting

trade, commerce, and manufacture, for other countries, American

agriculture must not only be self-supporting, but, in large degree,

agriculture must support our other great industries.

"Without agriculture, the coal and iron would remain in the earth,

the forest would be left uncut, the railroads would be abandoned,

the cities depopulated, and the wooded lands and water-ways would

again be used only for hunting and fishing. Shall we not remember,

for example, that the coal mine yields a single harvest--one

crop--and is then forever abandoned; while the soil must yield a

hundred--yes, a thousand crops, and even then it must be richer and

more productive than at the beginning, if those who come after us

are to continue to multiply and replenish the earth.

"Even the best possible system of soil improvement, we must admit,

is not the absolute and final solution of this, the most stupendous

problem of the United States. If war gives way to peace and

pestilence to science, then the time will come when the soils of

America shall reach the limit of the highest productive power

possible to be permanently maintained, even by the general adoption

of the most practical scientific methods; and before that limit is

reached, if power, progress, and plenty are to continue in our

beloved country, there must be developed and enforced the law of the

survival of the fittest; otherwise there is no ultimate future for

America different from that of China, India, and Russia, the only

great agricultural countries comparable to the United States. An

enlightened humanity must grant to all the right to live, but the

reproduction and perpetuation of the unfit can never be an absolute

and inalienable right.

"Under the present laws and customs, a man may spend half his life

in the insane asylum or in the penitentiary, and still be the father

of a dozen children with degenerate tendencies. There should be no

reproduction from convicted criminals, insane persons, and other

degenerates. Thieves, grafters, bribers and bribe-takers all belong

in the same class, and it should not be left possible for them to

reproduce their kind. They are a burden upon the public which the

public must bear, but the public is under no obligation to permit

their multiplication. The children of such should never become the

parents of others. It is a crime against both the child and the

public.

"No doubt you will consider this extremely visionary, and so it is;

but unless America can see a vision somewhat like this, a population

that is doubling three or four times each century, and an area of

depleted soils that is also increasing at a rapid rate will combine

to bring our Ship of State into a current against which we may

battle in vain; for there is not another New World to bring new

wealth, new prosperity, and new life and light after another period

of 'Dark Ages.'

"Whether we shall ever apply any such intelligence to the possible

improvement of our own race as we have in the great improvement of

our cattle and corn is, of course, an open question; but to some

extent you will agree that the grafter and the insane, like the

poet, are born and not made. Of course there are, and always will

be, marked variations, mutants, or 'sports,' but, nevertheless,

natural inheritance is the master key to the improvement of every

form of life; and it is an encouraging fact that some of the states,

as Indiana, for example, have already adopted laws looking toward

the reduction of the reproduction of convicted degenerates."

The Story of the Soil; from the Basis of Absolute Science and Real Life · 第 15 / 42 章