The author of these lines is not without his _hic jacet._

By the good sense of his son, it contains none of that praise which no

marble can make the bad or the foolish merit; which, without the

direction of a stone or a turf, will find its way, sooner or later, to

the deserving.

M. S.

Optimi parentis

EDVARDI YOUNG, LL.D.

hujus ecclesiae rect.

Et Elizabethae

faem. praenob.

Conjugis ejus amantissimae,

pio et gratissimo animo

hoc marmor posuit

F. Y.

Filius superstes.

Is it not strange that the author of the Night Thoughts has inscribed no

monument to the memory of his lamented wife? Yet, what marble will

endure as long as the poems?

Such, my good friend, is the account which I have been able to collect

of the great Young. That it may be long before any thing like what I

have just transcribed be necessary for you, is the sincere wish of,

Dear sir,

Your greatly obliged friend,

HERBERT CROFT, Jun.

Lincoln's Inn, Sept. 1780.

P.S. This account of Young was seen by you in manuscript, you know, sir;

and, though I could not prevail on you to make any alteration, you

insisted on striking out one passage, because it said, that, if I did

not wish you to live long, for your sake, I did for the sake of myself

and of the world. But this postscript you will not see before the

printing of it; and I will say here, in spite of you, how I feel myself

honoured and bettered by your friendship: and that, if I do credit to

the church, after which I always longed, and for which I am now going to

give in exchange the bar, though not at so late a period of life as

Young took orders, it will be owing, in no small measure, to my having

had the happiness of calling the author of the Rambler my friend[191].

H.C.

Oxford, Oct. 1782.

Of Young's poems it is difficult to give any general character; for he

has no uniformity of manner: one of his pieces has no great resemblance

to another. He began to write early, and continued long; and at

different times had different modes of poetical excellence in view. His

numbers are sometimes smooth, and sometimes rugged; his style is

sometimes concatenated, and sometimes abrupt; sometimes diffusive, and

sometimes concise. His plan seems to have started in his mind at the

present moment; and his thoughts appear the effect of chance, sometimes

adverse, and sometimes lucky, with very little operation of judgment.

He was not one of those writers whom experience improves, and who,

observing their own faults, become gradually correct. His poem on the

Last Day, his first great performance, has an equability and propriety,

which he afterwards either never endeavoured or never attained. Many

paragraphs are noble, and few are mean, yet the whole is languid: the

plan is too much extended, and a succession of images divides and

weakens the general conception; but the great reason why the reader is

disappointed is, that the thought of the Last Day makes every man more

than poetical, by spreading over his mind a general obscurity of sacred

horrour, that oppresses distinction, and disdains expression.

His story of Jane Grey was never popular. It is written with elegance

enough; but Jane is too heroick to be pitied.

The Universal Passion is, indeed, a very great performance. It is said

to be a series of epigrams; but, if it be, it is what the author

intended; his endeavour was at the production of striking distichs and

pointed sentences; and his distichs have the weight of solid sentiment,

and his points the sharpness of resistless truth.

His characters are often selected with discernment, and drawn with

nicety; his illustrations are often happy, and his reflections often

just. His species of satire is between those of Horace and Juvenal; and

he has the gaiety of Horace without his laxity of numbers, and the

morality of Juvenal, with greater variation of images. He plays, indeed,

only on the surface of life; he never penetrates the recesses of the

mind, and, therefore, the whole power of his poetry is exhausted by a

single perusal; his conceits please only when they surprise.

To translate he never condescended, unless his Paraphrase on Job may be

considered as a version; in which he has not, I think, been

unsuccessful; he, indeed, favoured himself, by choosing those parts

which most easily admit the ornaments of English poetry.

He had least success in his lyrick attempts, in which he seems to have

been under some malignant influence: he is always labouring to be great,

and at last is only turgid.

In his Night Thoughts he has exhibited a very wide display of original

poetry, variegated with deep reflections and striking allusions, a

wilderness of thought, in which the fertility of fancy scatters flowers

of every hue and of every odour. This is one of the few poems in which

blank verse could not be changed for rhyme but with disadvantage. The

wild diffusion of the sentiments, and the digressive sallies of

imagination, would have been compressed and restrained by confinement to

rhyme. The excellence of this work is not exactness, but copiousness;

particular lines are not to be regarded; the power is in the whole; and

in the whole there is a magnificence like that ascribed to Chinese

plantations, the magnificence of vast extent and endless diversity.

His last poem was Resignation; in which he made, as he was accustomed,

an experiment of a new mode of writing, and succeeded better than in his

Ocean or his Merchant. It was very falsely represented as a proof of

decaying faculties. There is Young in every stanza, such as he often was

in his highest vigour.

His tragedies, not making part of the collection, I had forgotten, till

Mr. Steevens recalled them to my thoughts by remarking, that he seemed

to have one favourite catastrophe, as his three plays all concluded with

lavish suicide; a method by which, as Dryden remarked, a poet easily

rids his scene of persons whom he wants not to keep alive. In Busiris

there are the greatest ebullitions of imagination: but the pride of

Busiris is such as no other man can have, and the whole is too remote

from known life to raise either grief, terrour, or indignation. The

Revenge approaches much nearer to human practices and manners, and,

therefore, keeps possession of the stage: the first design seems

suggested by Othello; but the reflections, the incidents, and the

diction, are original. The moral observations are go introduced, and so

expressed, as to have all the novelty that can be required. Of the

Brothers I may be allowed to say nothing, since nothing was ever said of

it by the publick.

It must be allowed of Young's poetry, that it abounds in thought, but

without much accuracy or selection. When he lays hold of an

illustration, he pursues it beyond expectation, sometimes happily, as in

his parallel of Quicksilver with Pleasure[192] which I have heard

repeated at the approbation by a lady, of whose praise he would have

been justly proud, and which is very ingenious, very subtile, and almost

exact: but sometimes he is less lucky, as when, in his Night Thoughts,

having it dropped into his mind, that the orbs floating in space might

be called the _cluster_ of creation, he thinks of a cluster of grapes,

and says, that they all hang on the great vine, drinking the "nectareous

juice of immortal life."

His conceits are sometimes yet less valuable. In the Last Day he hopes

to illustrate the reassembly of the atoms that compose the human body at

the "trump of doom" by the collection of bees into a swarm at the

tinkling of a pan.

The prophet says of Tyre, that "her merchants are princes." Young says

of Tyre, in his Merchant,

Her merchants princes, and each _deck a throne_.

Let burlesque try to go beyond him.

He has the trick of joining the turgid and familiar: to buy the alliance

of Britain, "Climes were paid down." Antithesis is his favourite: "They

for kindness hate;" and, "because she's right, she's ever in the wrong."

His versification is his own: neither his blank nor his rhyming lines

have any resemblance to those of former writers; he picks up no

hemistichs, he copies no favourite expressions; he seems to have laid

up no stores of thought or diction, but to owe all to the fortuitous

suggestions of the present moment. Yet I have reason to believe that,

when once he had formed a new design, he then laboured it with very

patient industry; and that he composed with great labour and frequent

revisions.

His verses are formed by no certain model; he is no more like himself in

his different productions than he is like others. He seems never to have

studied prosody, nor to have had any direction but from his own ear.

But, with all his defects, he was a man of genius and a poet.

-----

[Footnote 185: See Gent. Mag. vol. lxx. p. 225. N.]

[Footnote 186: As my great friend is now become the subject of

biography, it should be told, that every time I called upon Johnson

during the time I was employed in collecting materials for this life and

putting it together, he never suffered me to depart without some such

farewell as this: "Don't forget that rascal Tindal, sir. Be sure to hang

up the atheist." Alluding to this anecdote, which Johnson had mentioned

to me.]

[Footnote 187: Dr. Johnson, in many cases, thought and directed

differently, particularly in Young's works. J.N.]

[Footnote 188: Not in the Tatler, but in the Guardian, May 9, 1713.]

[Footnote 189: See a letter from the duke of Wharton to Swift, dated

1717, in Swift's works, in which he mentions Young being then in

Ireland. J.B.N.]

[Footnote 190: Davies, in his life of Garrick, says 1720, and that it

was produced thirty-three years after.]

[Footnote 191: Mr. Boswell discovered in this heavy piece of biography a

successful imitation of Johnson's style. An eminent literary character

exclaimed, "No, no, it is not a good imitation of Johnson; it has all

his pomp without his force; it has all the nodosities of the oak without

its strength." Endeavouring to express himself still more in Johnsonian

phrase, he added, "It has all the contortions of the Sybil, without the

inspiration." See Boswell, iv. According to Malone, this eminent person

was Burke, and the observation is assigned to him, without hesitation,

in Prin's Life. It has sometimes been attributed to G. Stevens. ED.]

[Footnote 192: See Mrs. Piozzi's Anecdotes, 162.]

The Works of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. in Nine Volumes, Volume 08 The Lives of the Poets, Volume II · 第 62 / 67 题