WORDSWORTH

[39] SOME English critics at the beginning of the present century had a

great deal to say concerning a distinction, of much importance, as they

thought, in the true estimate of poetry, between the Fancy, and another

more powerful faculty--the Imagination. This metaphysical distinction,

borrowed originally from the writings of German philosophers, and

perhaps not always clearly apprehended by those who talked of it,

involved a far deeper and more vital distinction, with which indeed all

true criticism more or less directly has to do, the distinction,

namely, between higher and lower degrees of intensity in the poet's

perception of his subject, and in his concentration of himself upon his

work. Of those who dwelt upon the metaphysical distinction between the

Fancy and the Imagination, it was Wordsworth who made the most of it,

assuming it as the basis for the final classification of his poetical

writings; and it is in these writings that the deeper and more vital

distinction, which, as I have said, underlies the metaphysical [40]

distinction, is most needed, and may best be illustrated.

For nowhere is there so perplexed a mixture as in Wordsworth's own

poetry, of work touched with intense and individual power, with work of

almost no character at all. He has much conventional sentiment, and

some of that insincere poetic diction, against which his most serious

critical efforts were directed: the reaction in his political ideas,

consequent on the excesses of 1795, makes him, at times, a mere

declaimer on moral and social topics; and he seems, sometimes, to force

an unwilling pen, and write by rule. By making the most of these

blemishes it is possible to obscure the true aesthetic value of his

work, just as his life also, a life of much quiet delicacy and

independence, might easily be placed in a false focus, and made to

appear a somewhat tame theme in illustration of the more obvious

parochial virtues. And those who wish to understand his influence, and

experience his peculiar savour, must bear with patience the presence of

an alien element in Wordsworth's work, which never coalesced with what

is really delightful in it, nor underwent his special power. Who that

values his writings most has not felt the intrusion there, from time to

time, of something tedious and prosaic? Of all poets equally great, he

would gain most by a skilfully made anthology. Such a selection would

show, in truth, not so much what he was, or to himself or others [41]

seemed to be, as what, by the more energetic and fertile quality in his

writings, he was ever tending to become. And the mixture in his work,

as it actually stands, is so perplexed, that one fears to miss the

least promising composition even, lest some precious morsel should be

lying hidden within--the few perfect lines, the phrase, the single word

perhaps, to which he often works up mechanically through a poem, almost

the whole of which may be tame enough. He who thought that in all

creative work the larger part was given passively, to the recipient

mind, who waited so dutifully upon the gift, to whom so large a measure

was sometimes given, had his times also of desertion and relapse; and

he has permitted the impress of these too to remain in his work. And

this duality there--the fitfulness with which the higher qualities

manifest themselves in it, gives the effect in his poetry of a power

not altogether his own, or under his control, which comes and goes when

it will, lifting or lowering a matter, poor in itself; so that that old

fancy which made the poet's art an enthusiasm, a form of divine

possession, seems almost literally true of him.

This constant suggestion of an absolute duality between higher and

lower moods, and the work done in them, stimulating one always to look

below the surface, makes the reading of Wordsworth an excellent sort of

training towards the things of art and poetry. It begets in those,

[42] who, coming across him in youth, can bear him at all, a habit of

reading between the lines, a faith in the effect of concentration and

collectedness of mind in the right appreciation of poetry, an

expectation of things, in this order, coming to one by means of a right

discipline of the temper as well as of the intellect. He meets us with

the promise that he has much, and something very peculiar, to give us,

if we will follow a certain difficult way, and seems to have the secret

of a special and privileged state of mind. And those who have

undergone his influence, and followed this difficult way, are like

people who have passed through some initiation, a disciplina arcani, by

submitting to which they become able constantly to distinguish in art,

speech, feeling, manners, that which is organic, animated, expressive,

from that which is only conventional, derivative, inexpressive.

But although the necessity of selecting these precious morsels for

oneself is an opportunity for the exercise of Wordsworth's peculiar

influence, and induces a kind of just criticism and true estimate of

it, yet the purely literary product would have been more excellent, had

the writer himself purged away that alien element. How perfect would

have been the little treasury, shut between the covers of how thin a

book! Let us suppose the desired separation made, the electric thread

untwined, the golden pieces, [43] great and small, lying apart

together.* What are the peculiarities of this residue? What special

sense does Wordsworth exercise, and what instincts does he satisfy?

What are the subjects and the motives which in him excite the

imaginative faculty? What are the qualities in things and persons

which he values, the impression and sense of which he can convey to

others, in an extraordinary way?

An intimate consciousness of the expression of natural things, which

weighs, listens, penetrates, where the earlier mind passed roughly by,

is a large element in the complexion of modern poetry. It has been

remarked as a fact in mental history again and again. It reveals

itself in many forms; but is strongest and most attractive in what is

strongest and most attractive in modern literature. It is exemplified,

almost equally, by writers as unlike each other as Senancour and

Théophile Gautier: as a singular chapter in the history of the human

mind, its growth might be traced from Rousseau to Chateaubriand, from

Chateaubriand to Victor Hugo: it has doubtless some latent connexion

with those pantheistic theories which locate an intelligent soul in

material things, and have largely exercised men's minds in some modern

systems of philosophy: it is traceable even in [44] the graver writings

of historians: it makes as much difference between ancient and modern

landscape art, as there is between the rough masks of an early mosaic

and a portrait by Reynolds or Gainsborough. Of this new sense, the

writings of Wordsworth are the central and elementary expression: he is

more simply and entirely occupied with it than any other poet, though

there are fine expressions of precisely the same thing in so different

a poet as Shelley. There was in his own character a certain

contentment, a sort of inborn religious placidity, seldom found united

with a sensibility so mobile as his, which was favourable to the quiet,

habitual observation of inanimate, or imperfectly animate, existence.

His life of eighty years is divided by no very profoundly felt

incidents: its changes are almost wholly inward, and it falls into

broad, untroubled, perhaps somewhat monotonous spaces. What it most

resembles is the life of one of those early Italian or Flemish

painters, who, just because their minds were full of heavenly visions,

passed, some of them, the better part of sixty years in quiet,

systematic industry. This placid life matured a quite unusual

sensibility, really innate in him, to the sights and sounds of the

natural world--the flower and its shadow on the stone, the cuckoo and

its echo. The poem of Resolution and Independence is a storehouse of

such records: for its fulness of imagery it may be compared to Keats's

Saint Agnes' Eve. To [45] read one of his longer pastoral poems for

the first time, is like a day spent in a new country: the memory is

crowded for a while with its precise and vivid incidents--

The pliant harebell swinging in the breeze

On some grey rock;--

The single sheep and the one blasted tree

And the bleak music from that old stone wall;--

In the meadows and the lower ground

Was all the sweetness of a common dawn;--

And that green corn all day is rustling in thine ears.

Clear and delicate at once, as he is in the outlining of visible

imagery, he is more clear and delicate still, and finely scrupulous, in

the noting of sounds; so that he conceives of noble sound as even

moulding the human countenance to nobler types, and as something

actually "profaned" by colour, by visible form, or image.

He has a power likewise of realising, and conveying to the

consciousness of the reader, abstract and elementary

impressions--silence, darkness, absolute motionlessness: or, again, the

whole complex sentiment of a particular place, the abstract expression

of desolation in the long white road, of peacefulness in a particular

folding of the hills. In the airy building of the brain, a special day

or hour even, comes to have for him a sort of personal identity, a

spirit or angel given to it, by which, for its exceptional [46]

insight, or the happy light upon it, it has a presence in one's

history, and acts there, as a separate power or accomplishment; and he

has celebrated in many of his poems the "efficacious spirit," which, as

he says, resides in these "particular spots" of time.

It is to such a world, and to a world of congruous meditation thereon,

that we see him retiring in his but lately published poem of The

Recluse--taking leave, without much count of costs, of the world of

business, of action and ambition; as also of all that for the majority

of mankind counts as sensuous enjoyment.*

And so it came about that this sense of a life in natural objects,

which in most poetry is but a rhetorical artifice, is with Wordsworth

the assertion of what for him is almost literal fact. To him every

natural object seemed to possess more or less of a moral or spiritual

life, to be [47] capable of a companionship with man, full of

expression, of inexplicable affinities and delicacies of intercourse.

An emanation, a particular spirit, belonged, not to the moving leaves

or water only, but to the distant peak of the hills arising suddenly,

by some change of perspective, above the nearer horizon, to the passing

space of light across the plain, to the lichened Druidic stone even,

for a certain weird fellowship in it with the moods of men. It was

like a "survival," in the peculiar intellectual temperament of a man of

letters at the end of the eighteenth century, of that primitive

condition, which some philosophers have traced in the general history

of human culture, wherein all outward objects [48] alike, including

even the works of men's hands, were believed to be endowed with

animation, and the world was "full of souls"--that mood in which the

old Greek gods were first begotten, and which had many strange

aftergrowths.

In the early ages, this belief, delightful as its effects on poetry

often are, was but the result of a crude intelligence. But, in

Wordsworth, such power of seeing life, such perception of a soul, in

inanimate things, came of an exceptional susceptibility to the

impressions of eye and ear, and was, in its essence, a kind of

sensuousness. At least, it is only in a temperament exceptionally

susceptible on the sensuous side, that this sense of the expressiveness

of outward things comes to be so large a part of life. That he awakened

"a sort of thought in sense," is Shelley's just estimate of this

element in Wordsworth's poetry.

And it was through nature, thus ennobled by a semblance of passion and

thought, that he approached the spectacle of human life. Human life,

indeed, is for him, at first, only an additional, accidental grace on

an expressive landscape. When he thought of man, it was of man as in

the presence and under the influence of these effective natural

objects, and linked to them by many associations. The close connexion

of man with natural objects, the habitual association of his thoughts

and feelings with a particular spot of earth, has sometimes seemed to

[49] degrade those who are subject to its influence, as if it did but

reinforce that physical connexion of our nature with the actual lime

and clay of the soil, which is always drawing us nearer to our end.

But for Wordsworth, these influences tended to the dignity of human

nature, because they tended to tranquillise it. By raising nature to

the level of human thought he gives it power and expression: he subdues

man to the level of nature, and gives him thereby a certain breadth and

coolness and solemnity. The leech-gatherer on the moor, the woman

"stepping westward," are for him natural objects, almost in the same

sense as the aged thorn, or the lichened rock on the heath. In this

sense the leader of the "Lake School," in spite of an earnest

preoccupation with man, his thoughts, his destiny, is the poet of

nature. And of nature, after all, in its modesty. The English lake

country has, of course, its grandeurs. But the peculiar function of

Wordsworth's genius, as carrying in it a power to open out the soul of

apparently little or familiar things, would have found its true test

had he become the poet of Surrey, say! and the prophet of its life.

The glories of Italy and Switzerland, though he did write a little

about them, had too potent a material life of their own to serve

greatly his poetic purpose.

Religious sentiment, consecrating the affections and natural regrets of

the human heart, above all, that pitiful awe and care for the [50]

perishing human clay, of which relic-worship is but the corruption, has

always had much to do with localities, with the thoughts which attach

themselves to actual scenes and places. Now what is true of it

everywhere, is truest of it in those secluded valleys where one

generation after another maintains the same abiding-place; and it was

on this side, that Wordsworth apprehended religion most strongly.

Consisting, as it did so much, in the recognition of local sanctities,

in the habit of connecting the stones and trees of a particular spot of

earth with the great events of life, till the low walls, the green

mounds, the half-obliterated epitaphs seemed full of voices, and a sort

of natural oracles, the very religion of these people of the dales

appeared but as another link between them and the earth, and was

literally a religion of nature. It tranquillised them by bringing them

under the placid rule of traditional and narrowly localised

observances. "Grave livers," they seemed to him, under this aspect,

with stately speech, and something of that natural dignity of manners,

which underlies the highest courtesy.

And, seeing man thus as a part of nature, elevated and solemnised in

proportion as his daily life and occupations brought him into

companionship with permanent natural objects, his very religion forming

new links for him with the narrow limits of the valley, the low vaults

of his church, the rough stones of his [51] home, made intense for him

now with profound sentiment, Wordsworth was able to appreciate passion

in the lowly. He chooses to depict people from humble life, because,

being nearer to nature than others, they are on the whole more

impassioned, certainly more direct in their expression of passion, than

other men: it is for this direct expression of passion, that he values

their humble words. In much that he said in exaltation of rural life,

he was but pleading indirectly for that sincerity, that perfect

fidelity to one's own inward presentations, to the precise features of

the picture within, without which any profound poetry is impossible.

It was not for their tameness, but for this passionate sincerity, that

he chose incidents and situations from common life, "related in a

selection of language really used by men." He constantly endeavours to

bring his language near to the real language of men: to the real

language of men, however, not on the dead level of their ordinary

intercourse, but in select moments of vivid sensation, when this

language is winnowed and ennobled by excitement. There are poets who

have chosen rural life as their subject, for the sake of its

passionless repose, and times when Wordsworth himself extols the mere

calm and dispassionate survey of things as the highest aim of poetical

culture. But it was not for such passionless calm that he preferred

the scenes of pastoral life; and the meditative poet, sheltering [52]

himself, as it might seem, from the agitations of the outward world, is

in reality only clearing the scene for the great exhibitions of

emotion, and what he values most is the almost elementary expression of

elementary feelings.

And so he has much for those who value highly the concentrated

presentment of passion, who appraise men and women by their

susceptibility to it, and art and poetry as they afford the spectacle

of it. Breaking from time to time into the pensive spectacle of their

daily toil, their occupations near to nature, come those great

elementary feelings, lifting and solemnising their language and giving

it a natural music. The great, distinguishing passion came to Michael

by the sheepfold, to Ruth by the wayside, adding these humble children

of the furrow to the true aristocracy of passionate souls. In this

respect, Wordsworth's work resembles most that of George Sand, in those

of her novels which depict country life. With a penetrative pathos,

which puts him in the same rank with the masters of the sentiment of

pity in literature, with Meinhold and Victor Hugo, he collects all the

traces of vivid excitement which were to be found in that pastoral

world--the girl who rung her father's knell; the unborn infant feeling

about its mother's heart; the instinctive touches of children; the

sorrows of the wild creatures, even--their home-sickness, their strange

yearnings; the tales of passionate regret that hang [53] by a ruined

farm-building, a heap of stones, a deserted sheepfold; that gay, false,

adventurous, outer world, which breaks in from time to time to bewilder

and deflower these quiet homes; not "passionate sorrow" only, for the

overthrow of the soul's beauty, but the loss of, or carelessness for

personal beauty even, in those whom men have wronged--their pathetic

wanness; the sailor "who, in his heart, was half a shepherd on the

stormy seas"; the wild woman teaching her child to pray for her

betrayer; incidents like the making of the shepherd's staff, or that of

the young boy laying the first stone of the sheepfold;--all the

pathetic episodes of their humble existence, their longing, their

wonder at fortune, their poor pathetic pleasures, like the pleasures of

children, won so hardly in the struggle for bare existence; their

yearning towards each other, in their darkened houses, or at their

early toil. A sort of biblical depth and solemnity hangs over this

strange, new, passionate, pastoral world, of which he first raised the

image, and the reflection of which some of our best modern fiction has

caught from him.

He pondered much over the philosophy of his poetry, and reading deeply

in the history of his own mind, seems at times to have passed the

borders of a world of strange speculations, inconsistent enough, had he

cared to note such inconsistencies, with those traditional beliefs,

which [54] were otherwise the object of his devout acceptance.

Thinking of the high value he set upon customariness, upon all that is

habitual, local, rooted in the ground, in matters of religious

sentiment, you might sometimes regard him as one tethered down to a

world, refined and peaceful indeed, but with no broad outlook, a world

protected, but somewhat narrowed, by the influence of received ideas.

But he is at times also something very different from this, and

something much bolder. A chance expression is overheard and placed in

a new connexion, the sudden memory of a thing long past occurs to him,

a distant object is relieved for a while by a random gleam of

light--accidents turning up for a moment what lies below the surface of

our immediate experience--and he passes from the humble graves and

lowly arches of "the little rock-like pile" of a Westmoreland church,

on bold trains of speculative thought, and comes, from point to point,

into strange contact with thoughts which have visited, from time to

time, far more venturesome, perhaps errant, spirits.

He had pondered deeply, for instance, on those strange reminiscences

and forebodings, which seem to make our lives stretch before and behind

us, beyond where we can see or touch anything, or trace the lines of

connexion. Following the soul, backwards and forwards, on these

endless ways, his sense of man's dim, potential powers became a pledge

to him, indeed, of a future life, [55] but carried him back also to

that mysterious notion of an earlier state of existence--the fancy of

the Platonists--the old heresy of Origen. It was in this mood that he

conceived those oft-reiterated regrets for a half-ideal childhood, when

the relics of Paradise still clung about the soul--a childhood, as it

seemed, full of the fruits of old age, lost for all, in a degree, in

the passing away of the youth of the world, lost for each one, over

again, in the passing away of actual youth. It is this ideal childhood

which he celebrates in his famous Ode on the Recollections of

Childhood, and some other poems which may be grouped around it, such as

the lines on Tintern Abbey, and something like what he describes was

actually truer of himself than he seems to have understood; for his own

most delightful poems were really the instinctive productions of

earlier life, and most surely for him, "the first diviner influence of

this world" passed away, more and more completely, in his contact with

experience.

Sometimes as he dwelt upon those moments of profound, imaginative

power, in which the outward object appears to take colour and

expression, a new nature almost, from the prompting of the observant

mind, the actual world would, as it were, dissolve and detach itself,

flake by flake, and he himself seemed to be the creator, and when he

would the destroyer, of the world in which he lived--that old isolating

thought of many a brain-sick mystic of ancient and modern times.

[56] At other times, again, in those periods of intense susceptibility,

in which he appeared to himself as but the passive recipient of

external influences, he was attracted by the thought of a spirit of

life in outward things, a single, all-pervading mind in them, of which

man, and even the poet's imaginative energy, are but moments--that old

dream of the anima mundi, the mother of all things and their grave, in

which some had desired to lose themselves, and others had become

indifferent to the distinctions of good and evil. It would come,

sometimes, like the sign of the macrocosm to Faust in his cell: the

network of man and nature was seen to be pervaded by a common,

universal life: a new, bold thought lifted him above the furrow, above

the green turf of the Westmoreland churchyard, to a world altogether

different in its vagueness and vastness, and the narrow glen was full

of the brooding power of one universal spirit.

And so he has something, also, for those who feel the fascination of

bold speculative ideas, who are really capable of rising upon them to

conditions of poetical thought. He uses them, indeed, always with a

very fine apprehension of the limits within which alone philosophical

imaginings have any place in true poetry; and using them only for

poetical purposes, is not too careful even to make them consistent with

each other. To him, theories which for other men [57] bring a world of

technical diction, brought perfect form and expression, as in those two

lofty books of The Prelude, which describe the decay and the

restoration of Imagination and Taste. Skirting the borders of this

world of bewildering heights and depths, he got but the first exciting

influence of it, that joyful enthusiasm which great imaginative

theories prompt, when the mind first comes to have an understanding of

them; and it is not under the influence of these thoughts that his

poetry becomes tedious or loses its blitheness. He keeps them, too,

always within certain ethical bounds, so that no word of his could

offend the simplest of those simple souls which are always the largest

portion of mankind. But it is, nevertheless, the contact of these

thoughts, the speculative boldness in them, which constitutes, at least

for some minds, the secret attraction of much of his best poetry--the

sudden passage from lowly thoughts and places to the majestic forms of

philosophical imagination, the play of these forms over a world so

different, enlarging so strangely the bounds of its humble churchyards,

and breaking such a wild light on the graves of christened children.

And these moods always brought with them faultless expression. In

regard to expression, as with feeling and thought, the duality of the

higher and lower moods was absolute. It belonged to the higher, the

imaginative mood, and was the pledge of its reality, to bring the [58]

appropriate language with it. In him, when the really poetical motive

worked at all, it united, with absolute justice, the word and the idea;

each, in the imaginative flame, becoming inseparably one with the

other, by that fusion of matter and form, which is the characteristic

of the highest poetical expression. His words are themselves thought

and feeling; not eloquent, or musical words merely, but that sort of

creative language which carries the reality of what it depicts,

directly, to the consciousness.

The music of mere metre performs but a limited, yet a very peculiar and

subtly ascertained function, in Wordsworth's poetry. With him, metre

is but an additional grace, accessory to that deeper music of words and

sounds, that moving power, which they exercise in the nobler prose no

less than in formal poetry. It is a sedative to that excitement, an

excitement sometimes almost painful, under which the language, alike of

poetry and prose, attains a rhythmical power, independent of metrical

combination, and dependent rather on some subtle adjustment of the

elementary sounds of words themselves to the image or feeling they

convey. Yet some of his pieces, pieces prompted by a sort of

half-playful mysticism, like the Daffodils and The Two April Mornings,

are distinguished by a certain quaint gaiety of metre, and rival by

their perfect execution, in this respect, similar pieces among our own

Elizabethan, or contemporary French poetry.

[59] And those who take up these poems after an interval of months, or

years perhaps, may be surprised at finding how well old favourites

wear, how their strange, inventive turns of diction or thought still

send through them the old feeling of surprise. Those who lived about

Wordsworth were all great lovers of the older English literature, and

oftentimes there came out in him a noticeable likeness to our earlier

poets. He quotes unconsciously, but with new power of meaning, a

clause from one of Shakespeare's sonnets; and, as with some other men's

most famous work, the Ode on the Recollections of Childhood had its

anticipator.* He drew something too from the unconscious mysticism of

the old English language itself, drawing out the inward significance of

its racy idiom, and the not wholly unconscious poetry of the language

used by the simplest people under strong excitement--language,

therefore, at its origin.

The office of the poet is not that of the moralist, and the first aim

of Wordsworth's poetry is to give the reader a peculiar kind of

pleasure. But through his poetry, and through this pleasure in it, he

does actually convey to the reader an extraordinary wisdom in the

things of practice. One lesson, if men must have lessons, he conveys

more clearly than all, the supreme importance of contemplation in the

conduct of life.

[60] Contemplation--impassioned contemplation--that, is with Wordsworth

the end-in-itself, the perfect end. We see the majority of mankind

going most often to definite ends, lower or higher ends, as their own

instincts may determine; but the end may never be attained, and the

means not be quite the right means, great ends and little ones alike

being, for the most part, distant, and the ways to them, in this dim

world, somewhat vague. Meantime, to higher or lower ends, they move

too often with something of a sad countenance, with hurried and ignoble

gait, becoming, unconsciously, something like thorns, in their anxiety

to bear grapes; it being possible for people, in the pursuit of even

great ends, to become themselves thin and impoverished in spirit and

temper, thus diminishing the sum of perfection in the world, at its

very sources. We understand this when it is a question of mean, or of

intensely selfish ends--of Grandet, or Javert. We think it bad

morality to say that the end justifies the means, and we know how false

to all higher conceptions of the religious life is the type of one who

is ready to do evil that good may come. We contrast with such dark,

mistaken eagerness, a type like that of Saint Catherine of Siena, who

made the means to her ends so attractive, that she has won for herself

an undying place in the House Beautiful, not by her rectitude of soul

only, but by its "fairness"--by those quite different qualities [61]

which commend themselves to the poet and the artist.

Yet, for most of us, the conception of means and ends covers the whole

of life, and is the exclusive type or figure under which we represent

our lives to ourselves. Such a figure, reducing all things to

machinery, though it has on its side the authority of that old Greek

moralist who has fixed for succeeding generations the outline of the

theory of right living, is too like a mere picture or description of

men's lives as we actually find them, to be the basis of the higher

ethics. It covers the meanness of men's daily lives, and much of the

dexterity with which they pursue what may seem to them the good of

themselves or of others; but not the intangible perfection of those

whose ideal is rather in being than in doing--not those manners which

are, in the deepest as in the simplest sense, morals, and without which

one cannot so much as offer a cup of water to a poor man without

offence--not the part of "antique Rachel," sitting in the company of

Beatrice; and even the moralist might well endeavour rather to withdraw

men from the too exclusive consideration of means and ends, in life.

Against this predominance of machinery in our existence, Wordsworth's

poetry, like all great art and poetry, is a continual protest. Justify

rather the end by the means, it seems to say: whatever may become of

the fruit, make sure of [62] the flowers and the leaves. It was justly

said, therefore, by one who had meditated very profoundly on the true

relation of means to ends in life, and on the distinction between what

is desirable in itself and what is desirable only as machinery, that

when the battle which he and his friends were waging had been won, the

world would need more than ever those qualities which Wordsworth was

keeping alive and nourishing.*

That the end of life is not action but contemplation--being as distinct

from doing--a certain disposition of the mind: is, in some shape or

other, the principle of all the higher morality. In poetry, in art, if

you enter into their true spirit at all; you touch this principle, in a

measure: these, by their very sterility, are a type of beholding for

the mere joy of beholding. To treat life in the spirit of art, is to

make life a thing in which means and ends are identified: to encourage

such treatment, the true moral significance of art and poetry.

Wordsworth, and other poets who have been like him in ancient or more

recent times, are the masters, the experts, in this art of impassioned

contemplation. Their work is, not to teach lessons, or enforce rules,

or even to stimulate us to noble ends; but to withdraw the thoughts for

a little while from the mere machinery of life, to fix [63] them, with

appropriate emotions, on the spectacle of those great facts in man's

existence which no machinery affects, "on the great and universal

passions of men, the most general and interesting of their occupations,

and the entire world of nature,"--on "the operations of the elements

and the appearances of the visible universe, on storm and sunshine, on

the revolutions of the seasons, on cold and heat, on loss of friends

and kindred, on injuries and resentments, on gratitude and hope, on

fear and sorrow." To witness this spectacle with appropriate emotions

is the aim of all culture; and of these emotions poetry like

Wordsworth's is a great nourisher and stimulant. He sees nature full

of sentiment and excitement; he sees men and women as parts of nature,

passionate, excited, in strange grouping and connexion with the

grandeur and beauty of the natural world:--images, in his own words,

"of man suffering, amid awful forms and powers."

Such is the figure of the more powerful and original poet, hidden away,

in part, under those weaker elements in Wordsworth's poetry, which for

some minds determine their entire character; a poet somewhat bolder and

more passionate than might at first sight be supposed, but not too bold

for true poetical taste; an unimpassioned writer, you might sometimes

fancy, yet thinking the chief aim, in life and art alike, to be a

certain deep emotion; seeking most often the great [64] elementary

passions in lowly places; having at least this condition of all

impassioned work, that he aims always at an absolute sincerity of

feeling and diction, so that he is the true forerunner of the deepest

and most passionate poetry of our own day; yet going back also, with

something of a protest against the conventional fervour of much of the

poetry popular in his own time, to those older English poets, whose

unconscious likeness often comes out in him.

1874.

Appreciations, with an Essay on Style · 第 18 / 45 题