Brighton, of course, was the fashionable watering-place, for there

were the life and gaiety of the young Court, in contradistinction to

the humdrum existence led by the King, Queen, and younger branches of

the Royal Family, at Weymouth. So it will be interesting to know their

habits at this famous sea-side resort. The _Morning Post_, 18th

September 1788, has the following:--

"The Ladies have no particular dress for the morning, but

_huddle_ away to the bathing place, in close caps, and _gipsey

bonnets_, so that they look like a set of wandering

_fortune-tellers_, who have just had the opportunity of pillaging

the contents of a _frippery warehouse_, with which they had

bedecked themselves in haste.

"It is to be remarked that the ladies do not atone for the

negligence of the morning, by neatness, and elegance, during the

rest of the day, but _shuffle on something_ by dinner time,

covering themselves with an enormous _nondescript_ bonnet,

which, to the confusion of all order, they afterwards think a

proper garb for the Assembly."

In doors, the dresses were not so _outré_, as we see by the two

illustrations taken from "The School for Scandal," 1st August 1788.

That ladies copied the eccentricities of male attire, and made them

their own, we have proof in this cutting from the _Morning Post_, 15th

January 1789:--

"Among other fashions lately introduced from Paris is the brace

of gold watch chains now sported by our fashionable females. Some

economical husbands may wish their wives were less imitative."

The portrait of the Duchess of York (the Princess Frederique,

Charlotte, Ulrique, Catherine, of Prussia, married to the Duke,

November 1791), shews us the indoor dress of a lady of rank in 1792.

She had a remarkably small foot, and many were the delineations of her

shoes--actual size, &c.

Of all curious freaks of fashion the following is the most

incomprehensible, yet it doubtless obtained:--

"The fashion of dressing, at present, is to appear _prominent_,

and the stays are made accordingly. This is holding out a wish to

be thought in a thriving way, even without the authority of the

_Arches Court_ of Canterbury--something in the French way--a

philosophical desire to be _conspicuously great_ with MISCHIEF,

without any regard to law or reason. The idea was at first sent

forward by a few _dropsical_ Ladies."--(_Times, March 25, 1793._)

* * * * *

"The _Wapping Land-ladies_ are all at the very pinnacle of the

fashion. Nature has given them prominences which far out-picture

the false mountains at the West end of the town. It is not only

the fashion of appearing six months gone, that prevails with the

ladies--but that of not having any waists, so that, even with

their prominences, they may be called--_No-body_." (_Times, April

15, 1793._)

[Illustration: A Cotillion--1788.]

[Illustration: Fashions for 1788.]

[Illustration: Indoor Costumes.--1788.]

[Illustration: The Duchess of York.]

[Illustration: The Duchess.]

[Illustration: Frailties of Fashion--1793.]

[Illustration: The Height of Fashion--1793.]

[Illustration: The Toilette, No. 1.]

[Illustration: The Toilette, No. 2.]

[Illustration: The Toilette, No. 3.]

A series of prints were published which represent the amount of

indebtedness, ladies were under, to Art, to repair the ravages made by

Nature.

No. 1 shows us most graphically the "levée au matin."--Tears drop from

the eyeless socket--a yawn discloses the want of teeth, and, the

handkerchief, tied round the head, which does service for a night cap,

tells a sad tale of baldness.

In No. 2 the defect of nature is being remedied by the insertion of a

glass eye--which the subsequent illustrations prove to be very

effective.

No. 3 shows the triumph of the hairdresser's art; and, certainly, it

adds much to the ladies personal attractions.

In No. 4 false teeth are being inserted, to replace those, of which

unkind nature has robbed her.

No. 5 applies the bloom of youth to the faded cheek,--a bloom that

never yet deceived any one.

In No. 6 the Belle has finished her toilette, and is now prepared to

break all hearts.

This series is attributed to Rowlandson--and, most probably, is his

work. It is called "Six Stages of making a face.--Dedicated with

respect to Lady Archer," of which lady we shall hear more anon under

the head of "Gaming."

Waists, as may have been perceived by the last two, or three

examples, have been gradually disappearing, until, as in "The

Scarecrow," they became practically _nil_. High feathers were

beginning to come in, and, in addition to the "panache," was worn a

curious thing made of straw, very much resembling the "bristle plume"

which used to be worn in the Shakos of our Engineers, and Artillery.

In imitation of the men, the ladies' throats were swathed in

voluminous wrappers.

With very low bodices, and very high waists, came very scanty

clothing, with an absence of petticoat, a fashion which left very

little of the form to the imagination. I do not say that our English

Belles went to the extent of some of their French sisters, of having

their muslin dresses put on damp--and holding them tight to their

figures till they dried--so as absolutely to mould them to their form,

or that they ever discarded stockings, and went to balls with bare

feet, and only wearing sandals, having on but the lightest of

classical clothing--but their clothes were of the scantiest, and we

shall find that, as year succeeded year, this fashion developed, if

one can call diminution of clothing, development. Men made fun of it,

_vide_ the following from the _Times_, 12th August, 1794:--"Amongst

prudent papas, the favourite toast at this time is 'The present

fashion of our wives and daughters,' viz. _No Waste_."

There was a very pretty song, called "Shepherds, I have lost my love,

Have you seen my Anna?"--and this was parodied as follows--the music

being the same as the original song:--

[Song: SHEPHERDS, I HAVE LOST MY WAIST.

Shep-herds, I have lost my waist, Have you seen my bo - - dy?

Sac - ri - ficed to mo-dern taste, I'm quite a hod - dy dod - - dy.

For fashion I that part for - sook Where sages place the bel - - - ly;

'Tis gone, and I have not a nook For cheesecake, tart, or jel - ly.]

"Never shall I see it more,

Till, common sense returning,

My body to my legs restore,

Then I shall cease from mourning,

Folly and fashion do prevail

To such extremes among the fair,

A woman's only top and tail,

The body's banish'd God knows where!'

[Illustration: A Scarecrow--1793.]

[Illustration: Shepherds! I have lost my waist.--1794.]

[Illustration: Following the Fashion.]

[Illustration: Following the Fashion.]

That a fashion may become one person, and not another, is peculiarly

exemplified by the two following pictures by Gillray, 9th December,

1794, both called "Following the Fashion:"--

"St. James's giving the Ton, | "Cheapside aping the Mode,

a Soul without a Body. | a Body without a Soul."

* * * * *

The tax on Hair powder was much objected to; people had been used,

for a long time, to grease, and powder their hair and wigs; and, when

the duty of a Guinea per head was passed, many left off using it. The

illustration "Leaving off Powder, or a Frugal family saving a

Guinea," was doubtless the fact in many a family. The man, in the

coloured engraving, with his "crop," to our eyes does not look so

singular, as the lady, with her "fausse chevelure" unpowdered looks so

bad, that, no wonder, ladies reverted to their own locks, as we see

in future illustrations. So also shall we see the "Cap" of the

period, the length of which is most amusingly portrayed.

The wearing of false hair is of very early origin, inasmuch as we

possess, in the British Museum, an early Egyptian wig, and, in every

age, we find women supplementing their natural attractions, by the

addition of some one else's hair. Here is a Hair-dresser's

advertisement of 1795, wherein is not only mentioned the price, &c.,

of hair, but shows the antiquity of the "Chignon," which, otherwise,

many might think of modern date.

"TO THE LADIES.--T. BOWMAN respectfully acquaints the Ladies,

that he has entirely removed his Shop and Manufactory to No. 102

New Bond Street, near Brook Street. Firmly relying upon the

future favors and recommendation of his old Customers, and

trusting to the superiority of his articles, he has augmented his

stock of Chignons or Braids, from 600 to near 1000, in 14 shades

(not 20) of brown colours, besides Auburns, Flaxens, &c., and in

8 lengths (not 50) at 10s., 14s., £1 £1 1s., £1 11s. 6d., £2 2s.,

£3 3s., £4 4s., and £6 6s. each. Any colour matched in all the

sizes in a minute. T. Bowman formerly gave a description of his

Braids, but that has been copied by another and applied unto his

own, without their possessing one requisite for which Bowman's

Braids have been distinguished: and, not contented with slaying

by twenties, he now kills by fifties. Bravo! Captain Boabdill,

fifty more, kill them!!! As for the shades, what with Chinese

hairs, mixing, and dying, he may have them (as he says) of every

tint, but for real, natural, Brown colours. T. Bowman, with by

far the greatest stock in the Kingdom, cannot make more than 14

shades; he can only challenge a comparison, and pledges himself

to make good every assertion he has at any time made. His

Brunswick fillets, an entire new and elegant article, with curls

complete, fit either for morning or full dress, from 7s. 6d. to

10s. 6d. each, with Tetes, Borders, and every article in

ornamental Hair, much cheaper than at any shop in town: having a

very large stock, and dealing for ready money only, he has as yet

made no advance on his old prices, although the price of hair is

now double. Country orders, with money, or reference, duly

observed. Chignons, &c., changed when not approved of, if not

powdered."--(_Times, June 22, 1795._)

* * * * *

"Corsettes about six inches long, and a slight _buffon_ tucker of

two inches high, are now the only defensive _paraphernalia_ of

our fashionable Belles, between the necklace and the

apron-strings.--(_Times, June 24, 1795._)

"The annual City Assemblies, from the glowing colours which

decorate the _belles_, may be now fairly styled _red-hot

balls_."--(_Times, Dec. 29, 1795._)

[Illustration: Crops.]

[Illustration: A Lady putting on her Cap--1795.]

[Illustration: Characters in High Life.]

[Illustration: A Modern Belle going to the Rooms or Balls--1796.]

But Feathers were now used on the shafts levelled at the vagaries of

Fashion.

"At all elegant Assemblies, there is a room set apart for the

lady visitants to put their feathers on, as it is impossible to

wear them in any carriage with a top to it. The lustres are also

removed upon this account, and the doors are carried up to the

height of the ceiling. A well-dressed Lady, who nods with

dexterity, can give a friend a little tap upon the shoulder

across the room, without incommoding the dancers. The Ladies'

feathers are now generally carried in the sword-case, at the back

of the carriage."--(_Times, Dec. 29, 1795._)

* * * * *

"A young lady, _only ten feet high_, was overset in one of the

late gales of wind, in Portland Place, and the upper mast of her

feather blown upon Hampstead Hill."

"The _maroon fever_ has been succeeded by a very odd kind of

light-headedness, which the physicians call the _ptereo mania_,

or feather folly."

"The Ladies now wear feathers exactly of their own length, so

that a woman of fashion is twice as long upon her feet as in her

bed."--(_Times, Dec. 30, 1795._)

* * * * *

"We saw a feather in Drury Lane Theatre, yesterday evening, that

cost _ten_ guineas. We should have thought the _whole goose_ not

worth the money."--(_Times, Jan. 6, 1796._)

Here is a contrivance by which "A Modern Belle going to the Rooms or

Balls" can go fully dressed, with her feathers fixed:--

"There is to be seen in Gt. Queen Street, a Coach upon a new

construction. The Ladies set in this well, and see between the

spokes of the wheels. With this contrivance the fair proprietor

is able to go quite dressed to her visits, her feathers being

only a yard and a half high."--(_Times, Jan. 22, 1796._)

The freaks of fashion, towards the latter end of 1795, are most

curious. "Waggoner's frocks," and the "Petticoat" dress, are singular

illustrations of feminine taste. This latter is noticed in a paragraph

in the _Times_, 27th Oct. 1795. "The present fashionable dress is the

most simple imaginable. The petticoat is pinned to the Cravat, and the

arms come out at the pocket holes."

"The only new fashions that remain for our modern belles are

certainly puzzling and difficult. There can be nothing new, but

going either dressed or naked."--(_Times, Jan. 27, 1796._)

The following paragraph from the _Times_ refers not only to the

general absence of dress, but also to the famous (or infamous) Miss

Chudleigh, a maid of Honour to the Queen, afterwards Duchess of

Kingston, and tells the story of how the Princess of Wales, wife of

Frederick (father of George III.), rebuked her for her nakedness.

"One night, when the late Duchess of Kingston appeared at

Ranelagh in a dress which may be compared with the undress of

some of our fashionable _belles_, a _handkerchief_ was thrown to

her, not from the Prince, but the Princess of Wales."--(_Times,

March 5, 1796._)

"Lady Godiva's Rout, or Peeping Tom spying out Pope Joan," is by

Gillray, 12th March 1796, and is a scathing satire on the extremely

_decolletée_, and diaphonous, dresses of the time. The fair one, whose

uncovered bosom so attracts the candle snuffer, is intended to

represent Lady Georgiana Gordon, afterwards Duchess of Bedford.

"High Change in Bond Street" is by Gillray (27th March 1796), and is a

most amusing caricature of the then prevalent fashions both of men and

women. The "Bond Street Loungers," are depicted to perfection.

[Illustration: Waggoners Frock-or-No Bodys of 1795.]

[Illustration: The Fashion.--Dec{r}. 1795.]

[Illustration: Fashionable Modesty.--1796.]

[Illustration: High Change in Bond Street--1796.]

"At the late Fandango Ball in Dublin, a certain Lady of Fashion

appeared in the following very whimsical dress:--Flesh coloured

pantaloons, over which was a gauze petticoat, tucked up at each

side in drapery, so that both thighs could be seen; the binding

of the petticoat was tied round the neck, and her arms were

through the pocket holes. Her head dress was a man's pearl

coloured stocking, the foot hanging down at the back of the head

like a lappet, and in the heel of the stocking was stuck a large

diamond pin, the _tout ensemble_ not less novel, than

ludicrous."--(_Times, May 26, 1796._)

* * * * *

"_Whalebone-Veils_ are worn by all the fashionable dames at

Weymouth. This invention is evidently borrowed from the head of a

one horse chaise."--(_Times, August 27, 1796._)

* * * * *

"_High heels_ are once more the rage; there is, however, no

scarcity of _flats_. During the reign of the _flat sole_, the

Ladies make more faux-pas than ever, so that we need entertain no

apprehensions for them, if they chuse to get upon stilts. What

with high heels and high feathers, the _better half_ of many an

honest man is just one third part of herself."--(_Times, August

27, 1796._)

* * * * *

"Fashion would be its own murderer, if it were to be constant

and permanent. The last year's dress seems to abdicate entirely;

even the waist is walking down towards the hip; and three

straps, with buckles in front, have abridged so much of the

usurpation of the petticoat. One cannot see so many Ladies of

high ton with the straps over the bosom, without thinking how

much better they might have been employed over the

shoulders."--(_Times, Aug. 27, 1796._)

* * * * *

"Before the waist is quite again in fashion, and while the thing

exists (which will soon be incredible), we set down the

measurement of a petticoat in the summer of 1796, which for a

middling-sized woman is five foot and an inch."--(_Times, Nov. 4,

1796._)

* * * * *

"It would not be easily believed by our Great Grandmothers, that

their lovely daughters cannot make their appearance without a

dozen combs in their heads, and as many false curls and cushions.

The victory over black pins is complete."--(_Times, May 30,

1797._)

* * * * *

"Horse Hair has risen near 50 per cent. since Wigs have become so

much the rage."--(_Times, April 27, 1798._)

* * * * *

"The women at Paris are every day divesting themselves of some of

the customary articles of dress, and the rage for _nudity_ is so

great, that it is apprehended, even by the Parisian Journalists,

they will shortly have the effrontery to present themselves to

the public eye in a state of pure nature. One of them appeared a

few days since in the Champs Elysées, in a simple robe of spotted

black gauze, and shewed so much that little was left to guess.

The spectators were struck with indignation at this flagrant

violation of decorum, and she was compelled to make a shameful

and precipitate retreat."--(_Times, June 18, 1798._)

* * * * *

"An Artist has advertised that he makes up worn out Umbrellas

into fashionable Gypsey Bonnets. The transition is so easy, that

he is scarce to be praised for the invention.

"The _Gypsey Bonnet_ is commonly worn by the Lancashire

Witches."--(_Times, July 7, 1798._)

* * * * *

"We are very happy to see the waists of our fair country women

walking downwards by degrees towards the hip. But, as we are a

little acquainted with the laws of increasing velocity in

fashionable gravitation, we venture to express, thus early in

their descent, a hope that they will _stop there_."--(_Times,

April 15, 1799._)

* * * * *

"_Straw_ in the head-dress, according to the laws and immemorial

customs of the stage, denotes the unsoundness of the brain it

covers. Several of those useful and respectable young men, who

make the campaign of Bond Street, have thought proper to invest

their temples with the sacred symbols, and wear straw hats to

give notice of their light-headedness."--(_Times, July 4, 1799._)

The Censor could also be severe on the harmless "Reticule."

"In the present age of political innovation, it is curious to

observe the great veneration for antiquity which prevails in all

our dresses and fashions. Queen Elizabeth's ruffs decorate our

blooming belles; and our beaux are puckered and stuffed on the

shoulders _à la Richard the Third_. But what is still more

remarkable, is the total abjuration of the female pocket. Those

heavy appendages are no more worn at present than keys at the

girdles. Every fashionable fair carries her purse in her workbag.

Her money and her industry lie cheek by jowl: and her gambling

gains lie snug by her housewife. Her handkerchiefs, her toothpick

case, her watch, and her keys, if she has any, are the constant

concomitants of her visits; and while no part of the symmetry of

her shape is altered or concealed by the old-fashioned panniers,

she has the pleasure of laying everything that belongs to her

upon the table wherever she goes."--(_Times, Nov. 9, 1799._)

* * * * *

"A dashing Lady of Fashion, inconvenienced by the new custom of

carrying a bag with her handkerchief, smelling-bottle, purse,

&c., &c., went to a large party the other evening, attended by a

Page, who was employed to present the articles as they might be

wanted. The Page was well qualified to go through the fatigues of

office, being well-made, active, and just one and twenty. Should

the example be imitated, Pages will probably be more in request

than waiting-women."--(_Times, Dec. 7, 1799._)

* * * * *

"If the present fashion of nudity continues its career, the

Milliners must give way to the Carvers, and the most elegant

_fig-leaves_ will be all the mode.

"The fashion of _false bosoms_ has at least this utility, that it

compels our fashionable fair to wear _something_."--(_Times,

Dec. 11, 1799._)

With which most pungent criticism, we will take our leave of lady's

_dress_.

NAVY AND ARMY.

No history of England, that I know of, has ever given us so graphic a

description of the ways and means for procuring men for the Navy, as

the Newspapers of the time, and in this, as in many other things,

their help is invaluable.

When we find from what classes the Navy was recruited, we wonder at

what the men went through, without much murmuring; and, if their very

moderate, and just, demands, had been met in a conciliatory spirit, or

even, officially investigated, instead of being pooh-poohed, and

shelved--there would have been no mutiny at the Nore, nor elsewhere.

When afloat, sailors were kept in subjection, or as it was termed,

discipline, by brutality, foul language, and a plentiful application

of the lash, to be recouped by almost unlimited license, whilst on

shore, or, for the matter of that, when afloat, if at home in harbour.

When the _Royal George_ went down, there were 200 women on board, and

in Dibdin's song of "Wapping Old Stairs," the heroine plaintively

reminds her temporary lover thus--

"When _I passed a whole fortnight between decks with you_,

Did I e'er give a kiss, Tom, to one of the Crew?"

When the War with France broke out, it was hardly to be imagined that

Fishermen, and Merchant seamen, would volunteer to leave their quiet

occupation, to be bullied by petty, and other officers; to be triced

up, and lashed unmercifully, for even a venial fault; to be no better

paid, nor fed than they were already; and to have an extra chance of

death in a Naval engagement, even if the English were victorious, or

the certainty of semi-starvation in a French prison, if captured. So

the State, wanting food for slaughter, stretched out its strong hand,

and took it, by means of the pressgang. I shall have to recount a long

list of "severe," or "hot," presses--and, first of all, in order that

we may perfectly understand what a "press" was, and so thoroughly

identify ourselves with the position, let us see the very minute, and

vivid, description of _Smollett_, in "Roderick Random."

[Illustration: My Poll & my Partner Joe.--1796.]

"As I crossed Tower Wharf, a squat, tawny fellow, with a hanger by his

side, and a cudgel in his hand, came up to me calling, 'Yo ho!

brother, you must come along with me.' As I did not like his

appearance, instead of answering his salutation, I quickened my pace,

in hopes of ridding myself of his company; upon which, he whistled

aloud, and immediately another sailor appeared before me, who laid

hold of me by the collar, and began to drag me along. Not being of a

humour to relish such treatment, I disengaged myself of the assailant,

and, with one blow of my cudgel, laid him motionless on the ground;

and, perceiving myself surrounded in a trice, by ten or a dozen more,

exerted myself with such dexterity and success, that some of my

opponents were fain to attack me with drawn Cutlasses; and, after an

obstinate engagement, in which I received a large wound on my head,

and another on my left cheek, I was disarmed, taken prisoner, and

carried on board a pressing tender; where, after being pinioned like a

malefactor, I was thrust down into the hold, among a parcel of

miserable wretches, the sight of whom well nigh distracted me.

"As the commanding officer had not humanity enough to order my wounds

to be dressed, and I could not use my own hands, I desired one of my

fellow-captives who was unfettered, to take a handkerchief out of my

pocket, and tie it round my head, to stop the bleeding. He pulled out

my handkerchief ('tis true), but, instead of applying it to the use

for which I designed it, went to the grating of the hatchway, and,

with astonishing composure, sold it before my face to a bum boat

woman, then on board, for a quart of gin, with which he treated my

companions, regardless of my circumstances, and entreaties.

Old times · 第 5 / 27 段