THE PURSUIT OF TRUTH.

"To be loyal to the truth is of more account than to be merely

successful in formulating it."--_Popular Science Monthly_ for

December.

Indeed it is; for loyalty to truth is the prior condition of success

in formulating or stating it, and that loyalty not only precedes the

special success in formulating it, but is the prior cause of

_universal success_ in its attainment. Special perceptive powers and

favorable opportunities may enable scientists to ascertain certain

truths, as a lamp may enable them to discover a few objects near them

which darkness hides from others, but loyalty to truth reveals, like

daylight, all that lies within our horizon, for it opens widely all

the avenues between the mind and universal nature, and prevents our

mental transparency from being darkened in any direction or relation.

He who has this loyalty dominant in his nature never pronounces

anything false which subsequent investigation, or the investigation by

others, proves true. He never becomes an obstacle to the spread of any

truth. He is always the first to welcome a new truth and the last to

falter in sustaining it. He is always ready to recognize the same

sincerity and fidelity in others, and to give a kindly welcome to the

labors and discoveries of other followers of truth. As brave men

readily recognize and honor each other, so do the soldiers of truth

meet in quick sympathy and cordial co-operation.

The labors, the discoveries and promulgations of such men ever become

criteria by which to test the loyalty and truthfulness of others, for,

wherever they are presented, all who live in loyalty to truth are at

once attracted and realize their harmony with the truth. As the

magnetized iron attracts the unmagnetized, so does the loyal soul

charged with truth attract all other loyal souls.

But all through human history we find that inventions, discoveries

and, above all, momentous truths uniformly fail to attract the masses,

either of the learned or the unlearned, as was illustrated in our

December number, and hence we must conclude that, in the present early

or juvenile stage of human evolution, loyalty to truth is one of the

rarest virtues of humanity.

And yet, how often do we meet in literature expressions which would

indicate that the writers were entirely loyal. They mistake loyalty to

their own self-esteem, loyalty to their own dogmatic convictions,

mental limitations, prejudices, and prepossessions for loyalty to

truth, which is a passionless, modest, lovely and noble quality.

No doubt the contemporaries of Galileo, Newton, and Harvey indulged in

the same self-gratulations. The bigot and dogmatist in all ages have

entertained no doubt of their own loyalty to truth; but it was loyalty

to their own very limited perceptions, and to their profound

conviction that all outside of their own sphere of perception was

falsehood or nonentity, and should be received with supercilious scorn

or crushing blows whenever presented.

Men's minds are thus narrowed in the base contests of selfishness,

jealousy, and fraud; but of all the demoralizing influences that

darken the mind by closing up permanently its most important inlets,

none have had such a wide-spread and far-reaching power for evil as

the false theology which demands the absolute surrender of reason to

self-evident absurdities.

Benumbed by countless centuries of superstition and passive surrender

to false education, to social influences, to pre-natal conditions, to

the terrors of law and custom, and to the lurid threats and horrors of

the imaginary drama of eternity, the mass of mankind have lost the

power of the dispassionate philosophical reasoning demanded by loyalty

to truth, and they do not know how to appreciate it when they see it.

Rebelling now against this limitation and slavery, they still carry in

their rebellion the marks of their slavery, and in their honest

agnosticism they still fail to reason fairly in loyalty to truth, and

indulge in the same dogmatism, narrowness or prejudice as when they

were slaves to priestly dogmas.

It is true that in the agnostic scientific classes there is far more

independent reasoning capacity generally than among those who dwell in

the theological limitations, but their independence has not relieved

them from the dogmatism which has so long been cultivated in the human

race by all religious systems. The dogmatism of the medical college,

and of most scientific associations, rivals that of theological

sectarianism.

The _Popular Science Monthly_, from which the above expression in

behalf of loyalty to truth was taken, is itself a striking

illustration of _disloyalty_, and rigidly confines itself to the

fashionable doctrines of the schools, excluding from its pages

whatever differs from the prevalent scientific dogmatism, and while

denouncing the dogmatism of theology, exhibiting itself a dogmatism

equally blind, unreasoning and regardless of facts. Experimental

demonstrations and scientific facts, which transcend the limits of

their arbitrary theories, receive as little attention from the

dogmatists trained in medical schools, as they would from a college of

cardinals.

The JOURNAL OF MAN, in the presentation of new truths, attracts only

the candid, loyal and progressive. It does not hope to conquer the

results of inheritance, pre-natal influence and old institutions, or

force any truth upon reluctant and disloyal minds, but it knows that

there is an important and growing class who sympathize with loyalty

and prefer the glowing future to the decaying remains of the past.

To the party of progress, this magnificent republic opens a free and

ample field. The domination of habit and transmitted dogmatism is

growing continually weaker, fading away in churches and colleges. The

pulpit of today is tolerant indeed in comparison with the pulpit of

our fathers, and the bright, free thought of the advanced people

surrounds the colleges with an atmosphere which is gradually

penetrating their walls and modifying their policy. An important duty

devolves upon every loyal, progressive thinker,--the duty of speaking

out firmly, manfully and distinctly, to swell the volume of thought

which carries mankind onward to a nobler future.

Buchanan's Journal of Man, January 1888 Volume 1, Number 12 · 第 3 / 26 题