THE SERBS AND THE CROATS

We have alluded to the relations between Serbs and Croats. This is a

subject of such importance that it will be well to consider it more

fully. When Yugoslavia sprang into existence at the end of the War--70

per cent. of this State having previously been under the rule of the

House of Habsburg--it was met in various quarters with a grudging

welcome. Soon, we were told, it would dissolve again, and every symptom

of internal discontent was treated as a proof of this. On the other hand

there were those who told us that the Southern Slavs, having come

together after all these hundreds of years, were tightly clasped in each

others' arms and that all reports to the contrary came from very

interested parties.

Little was said of the Slovenes; their language, as we have mentioned,

is not the same as that spoken by Serbs and Croats, and--what is of

still greater importance--they have Slovenia to themselves. If Croatia

were equally immune from Serbs, then by this time the Southern Slavs

would be a more united nation. Those people were wrong who fancied that

the presence of the Serbs in Croatia--they form between one-fourth and

one-third of the population--would be of service in welding together the

new State. They forgot that for many years the Austro-Hungarian

Government had in Croatia played off the Roman Catholic Croats against

the Orthodox Serbs. The two Slav brothers were incited to mutual hatred,

and though such a propaganda would naturally have more effect among the

uneducated classes, yet all too often the _intelligentsia_ responded to

these machinations. More favour, of course, was shown to the Croats,

whose obedience could largely be secured by means of the Church, whereas

no similar pressure could be brought to bear upon the Orthodox Serbs.

Even if the Government approached the Orthodox clergy, these latter had

only a very moderate control over their flock. A Serb is always ready to

subscribe towards the erection of a new church, which he regards as most

other nations regard their flag; but when it is built he rarely enters

it. This being so, the Austro-Hungarian Government tyrannized over the

Serbs in Croatia by measures taken against their schools, the Cyrillic

alphabet and so forth. It was natural that the suffering Serbs were apt

to compare these restrictions with those that were imposed upon the

Croats. However, among the _intelligentsia_ an effort--a fairly

successful effort--was made to nullify this dividing policy; the

Serbo-Croat Coalition was formed, one of the protagonists being Svetozar

Pribi[vc]evi['c], that very energetic Serb of Croatia, and in 1906 this

party obtained no less than sixty-eight seats, while the power of the

older Croat parties was correspondingly diminished and Radi['c] had his

very small following in the Zagreb Lantag. [Those who represented

Croatia in the central Parliament at Buda-Pest were chosen by the Ban,

Khuen-Hedervary. Those forty members had practically no acquaintance

with the Magyar language, so that some of them drew their 8000 annual

crowns and only went to Pest if an important division was expected,

others who spent more time in the capital wasted their lives amid

surroundings just as riotous as and more expensive than the Parliament,

while only those did useful work who managed to confer, behind the

scenes, with the authorities. To some extent this was done by

Pribi[vc]evi['c] and to a greater extent by another Serb, Dr. Du[vs]an

Popovi['c], who surpassed him in capacity and geniality. It was he, by

the way, who demonstrated in the Buda-Pest Parliament that if the

average Croat deputy was ignorant of the Magyar language, there was a

greater ignorance of Serbo-Croatian on the part of the Magyars. One day

when he had started on a speech in his native tongue he was howled down

after he had explained that he was talking Serbian. He promised to

continue in Croatian, and did so without being interrupted.]

At Zagreb the fusion of the Croat and Serb _intelligentsia_ was still

very incomplete at the outbreak of the War--the Croat Star[vc]evist

party and others going their own way. During the War the

Austro-Hungarian Government ruled by means of the Coalition party; but

the latter had no choice, and throughout Croatia they were never charged

with infidelity to the Slav cause. They did whatever their delicate

situation permitted; and in October 1918, when the Slavs of Croatia and

Slovenia threw off the yoke of centuries and joined with the Serbs of

Serbia and Montenegro, one hoped that the simultaneous arrival in

Belgrade of the Coalition and the Star[vc]evist leaders heralded in

Croatia a cessation of the ancient hostility. Pribi[vc]evi['c] became

Minister of the Interior in the new State, and very soon it was obvious

that he meant to govern in a centralizing fashion, despite his earlier

assurance that no such steps would be taken without the sanction of the

Constituent Assembly. No doubt his motives were unimpeachable; he feared

lest the negative, anti-Serb mentality, which for so long had flourished

among the Croats, would not, except by drastic methods, be removed. He

was met with opposition. Now you see, he cried, there are still in

Croatia a number of disloyal Slavs, great landowners, Catholic clergy

and others whom the Habsburgs used to favour. And he continued, with

hundreds of edicts, to try to weld the State together. Consumed with

patriotism, his great black eyes on flame amid the pallor of his

face--his luminous and martyred face, to use the expression of his

friends--he never for a moment relaxed his efforts; if those who opposed

him were numerous it was all the more reason why he must be resolute.

The role fitted him very well, for he is the dourest politician in

Yugoslavia--a perfectly honest, upright, injudicious patriot. His

Democratic party had now taken the place of the Serbo-Croat Coalition

and it saw the other parties in Croatia gradually drifting back again

from it or rather from the dominating man; if his place had been

occupied by his afore-mentioned colleague, the burly and beloved

Du[vs]an Popovi['c], there would have been in Zagreb a very much suaver

atmosphere. But unfortunately Popovi['c] is a wealthy man, a highly

successful lawyer who cares little for the tumult of politics.... It was

a thorny problem, whether the State should be constituted on a federal

or a centralized basis.[63] The federation of the United States depends

on the centralization of political parties, whereas in Yugoslavia the

parties have only just begun to combine. Feudalism in the German Empire

rested on the predominance of Prussia, a position which the Serbs are,

under present conditions, loth to occupy in Yugoslavia. In Germany,

moreover, many of the States used to be independent, while in Yugoslavia

this was only the case with Serbia and Montenegro. Centralism would tend

to obliterate the tribal divisions, but on the other hand it brings in

its train bureaucracy, which is slow, cumbrous and often corrupt; it

demands unusually good central institutions and first-rate

communications, neither of which are as yet in a satisfactory state. The

constitution has arrived at a compromise between the federal and the

centralized systems. A writer in the _Contemporary Review_ (November

1921) said that the division of the whole of Yugoslavia into some

twenty administrative areas [he should have said thirty-three] to

replace the racial areas, was a very drastic proposal to put forward;

and he added that when the historic provincial divisions of France were

broken up into departments, the nation had been prepared by nearly 200

years of centralization under the monarchy. It is a flaw in his argument

to say that the previously existing areas were racial, whereas

populations of identical race were divided from one another by the

course of events. And in the proposed obliteration of these

divisions--to be effected in a less arbitrary fashion than in France,

where no account was taken of the former provinces--it can scarcely be

maintained that, of itself, this part of the centralizing programme in

Yugoslavia is so very drastic.

Whatever one may think about the Balkan peoples it is a fact that the

essential Serb, the Serb from [vS]umadia, is a pacific person, rather

lazy perhaps, but certainly more devoted to dancing than to battle. And

some of the wiser Serbs were dubious in 1919 and 1920 as to whether the

most sagacious methods were being employed in Croatia. Radi['c] was in

prison, but they were told that this impetuous demagogue was insisting

on a republic, and the Croat _intelligentsia_ were far from happy. It is

true that in the elections of November 1920 the National party, as the

Star[vc]evists now called themselves, had no great success; but the

Radi['c] party had more than half the seats. Surely this had not been

brought about merely by the chief's imprisonment? There seemed to be in

that province some wider, some growing dissatisfaction. And in the

spring of 1921 most of the Catholic Croats, those within and those

without the Radi['c] party, were nourishing a score of grievances. No

doubt a large proportion of these were unavoidable (in view of the state

of Central Europe) or were rather trivial (the mayor of an important

town told me that he, who was under the Minister of the Interior, had

received an order from the Belgrade Minister of War, with respect to the

detention of deserters--conditions, said he, were not so primitive in

the Austro-Hungarian monarchy) and sometimes the grievances were against

the Habsburgs (for not having made them more fit to assume these new

responsibilities), and sometimes they were against the Serbs for being

less civilized--though they might be more moral--than themselves, and

sometimes the grievances were personal: now and then after the Austrian

collapse a Serbian officer or his men, uncertain of the feelings of the

population, had acted with unwise, or rather with inexpedient,

vigour--instead of shooting those who in the general anarchy were laying

waste and plundering, they merely flogged them, and this was for a long

time remembered against them, although the Croat _intelligentsia_ who

had taken service in the police flogged in a far more wholesale fashion.

But down at the bottom of all the grievances there is the fundamental

fact that the Southern Slavs yearn to be comrades, to shake off the

differences which in the course of ages have grown up between them.

These fraternal sentiments may be crudely expressed--it has happened

that a Slav from Bosnia (whose ancestors adopted Islam some centuries

ago) finds himself in a Serbian village. He strikes up acquaintance with

some native. "What is your name?" asks the latter. "Muhammed." The Serb

has never heard of such a name; he is puzzled. "Well, never mind," says

he, and takes his new friend back to dinner. They sit down to the

sucking pig. Muhammed refuses to partake of it, and informs the Serb

that Allah would be angry. "Don't be afraid," says the Serb; "I'll tell

him that it's my fault," and after a time he overcomes the Bosniak's

scruples.... In more cultured circles the wonderful union of the

Southern Slavs is manifested after a different fashion, and those

neighbours who imagine that the afore-mentioned grievances are going to

dissolve the new State will one day see how much they are mistaken. The

Southern Slavs intend to quarrel with each other, to quarrel like

brothers.

The Birth of Yugoslavia, Volume 2 · 第 136 / 214 题