OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_By Mr. Punch's Staff of Learned Clerks._)

The long-promised _Herbert Beerbohm Tree_ (HUTCHINSON), than which I

have expected no book with more impatience, turns out to be a volume

full of lively interest, though rather an experiment in snap-shot

portraiture from various angles than a full-dress biography. Mr. MAX

BEERBOHM has arranged the book, himself contributing a short memoir of

his brother, which, together with what Lady TREE aptly calls her

_Reverie_, fills some two-thirds of it with the more intimate view of

the subject, the rest being supplied by the outside appreciations of

friends and colleagues. If I were to sum up my impression of the

resulting picture it would be in the word "happiness." Not without

reason did the TREES name a daughter FELICITY. Here was a life spent in

precisely the kind of success that held most delight for the

victor--honour, love, obedience, troops of friends; all that _Macbeth_

missed his exponent enjoyed in flowing measure. Perhaps TREE was never a

great actor, because he found existence too "full of a number of

things"; if so he was something considerably jollier, the enthusiastic,

often inspired amateur, approaching each new part with the zest of a

brief but brilliant enthusiasm. I suppose no popular favourite ever had

his name associated with more good stories and wit, original and

vicarious. Despite some entertaining extracts from his commonplace book

I doubt if this side of him is quite worthily represented; at least

nothing here quoted beats Lady TREE'S own _mot_ for a mendacious

newspaper poster--_Canard à la Press_. Possibly we are still to look for

a more official volume of reference; meantime the present memoir gives a

vastly readable sketch of one whose passing left a void perhaps

unexpectedly hard to fill.

* * * * *

In the prefatory chapter of _Our Women_ (CASSELL) Mr. ARNOLD BENNETT

coyly disclaims any intention of tackling his theme on strictly

scientific principles. The warning is perhaps hardly necessary, since,

apart from the duty which the author owes to his public as a novelist

rather than a philosopher, the title alone should be a sufficient guide.

One would hardly expect a serious zoologist, for instance, in attempting

to deal with the domesticated fauna, to entitle his work _Our Dumb

Friends_. The book is divided in the main between adjuration and

prophecy. As a result of their emancipation from economic slavery, Mr.

BENNETT expects women--women, that is to say, of the "top class," as he

calls it--to adopt more and more the _rôle_ of professional

wage-earners; but at the same time he insists that they do not as yet

take themselves seriously enough as professional housekeepers. How the

two functions are to be combined it is a little difficult to see, but

apparently women are to retain a profession as a stand-by in case they

fail to marry or to remain married. At the same time Mr. BENNETT takes

it for granted that woman will never relinquish her position as a

charmer of man, or even the use of cosmetics and expensive lingerie.

Speaking neither as a novelist nor as a philosopher, I cannot help

feeling that Mr. BENNETT is too apt to consider the things he

particularly likes about women to be eternal, and those that he does not

like so much to be susceptible of alteration and improvement. Anyhow, it

looks as if Our Men were going to have rather a thin time.

* * * * *

Miss BEATRICE HARRADEN calls her latest story _Spring Shall Plant_

(HODDER AND STOUGHTON). She might equally well have called it _The

Successes of a Naughty Child_. Certainly it is chiefly concerned with

the many triumphant insubordinations of _Patuffa_ (whom I suspect of

having been encouraged by her too challenging name) both at home and at

the various schools from which she either ran away or was returned with

thanks. This is all mildly attractive if only from the vivacity of its

telling; but I confess to having felt a mild wonder whether a child's

book had not got on to my table by error--when the grown-ups suddenly

began to carry on in a way that placed all such doubts at rest. There

was, for example, a Russian lady, godmother of _Patuffa_, who escaped

from somewhere and established herself, with others of her kind, in an

attic in Coptic Street. My welcome for this interesting fugitive was to

some extent shaken by a realisation that she was (so to speak) a refugee

from the other side and, in a sense, a spiritual ancestress of

Bolshevism. Miss HARRADEN would however object, and justly, that the

clean-purposed conspirators of the earlier revolution had little in

common with the unsavoury individuals who at present obscure the Russian

dawn. Soon after this, _Patuffa's_ papa begins to go quite dreadfully

off the rails, even to the extent of wishing to elope with her governess

and eventually losing all his money and shooting himself. There was also

a famous violinist--well, you can see already that _Patuffa's_ vernal

experiences were on generous lines. It is to the credit of all concerned

that she and her story retain an appreciable charm under adverse

conditions.

* * * * *

Nothing, one would imagine, could promise much more restful reading than

a book that concerns itself with such things as christening robes for

caterpillars, the dyeing blue of white chickens and searches among

Californian lilies and pine-trees for the soul of a hog unseasonably

defunct. But, since this most uncharitable age refuses to believe

anything just because it is told it should, the peaceful pages of _The

Diary of Opal Whiteley_ (PUTNAM) are unfortunately fussed over with a

controversy that no one who reads them can quite escape. Miss WHITELEY'S

diary is presented with every circumstance of solemn asseveration as the

unaided work of a child of seven, only now pieced together by the writer

after quite a number of years. If you care to throw yourself into the

argument you will certainly find heaps of reasons for thinking unkind

thinks, as the writer would say, of the truth of this claim,

particularly in the completeness with which every incident is carried

through various stages to its literary finish; but, if you will be ruled

by me, you will try to forget anything but the book itself, with its

quite charming pictures of many animals and one little girl, their

understanding friend. The quaint idiom in which the diary is supposed to

have been written (or, of course, was written) adds to the delight of a

rather uncommon feeling for nature at its simplest, while the scrapes

for which the small heroine receives (or, you may say, is alleged to

receive) well-deserved punishment preserve the book from ever dropping

into mere mawkishness. A great pity, I think, that it was not published

rather as based on childish memories than as the actual printed script

of a prodigy.

* * * * *

_Moon Mountains_ (HURST AND BLACKETT) is a story which with the best

will in the world I found it impossible to regard wholly seriously. The

greater part of the scene is laid in Darkest Africa, where the father of

the hero, _Peter_ (my hope that the _Peter_ habit had blown over appears

to have been premature), disappears at an early stage. The subsequent

course of events reminds me of the words of the musical-comedy poet,

popular in my youth, who wrote, "It were better for you rather not to

try and find your father, than to find him"--well, certainly better than

to find him as _Peter_ found his. Perhaps it would not be unfair to

suppose that Miss MARGARET PETERSON had at this point her eye already

firmly fixed upon her big situation. Certainly the course of _Peter_ is

rather impatiently and spasmodically sketched till the moment when

matters are sufficiently advanced to ship him also to Africa, in company

with an elderly hunter of butterflies named _Mellis_. Their adventures

form the bulk of the tale (filled out with some chat about elephants,

and a sufficiency of love-making on the part of _Peter_), and I suppose

I need hardly tell you how one of them, poor _Mellis_, is immediately

captured and brought before the terrible white king of the hidden lands,

nor how this same monarch, a really dreadfully unpleasant person, turns

out to be--Precisely. So there the tale is; little more incredible than,

I dare say, most of its kind; and if you have no rooted objection to

characters all of whom behave like persons who know they are in a book

there is no reason why you should not find it at least passably

entertaining.

* * * * *

Mr. F. BRETT YOUNG'S manner of presenting _The Tragic Bride_ (SECKER) is

not free from affectation, and this is the more irritating because his

literary style is in itself admirably unpretentious. But having recorded

this complaint I gladly go on to declare that his tale of _Gabrielle

Hewish_ has both charm and distinction. I protest my belief in

_Gabrielle_ both in her Irish and English homes, but my protest would

have been superfluous if Mr. BRETT YOUNG had not almost super-taxed my

powers of belief. So also with _Arthur Payne_; he is a fascinating lad,

and the battle between his mother and _Gabrielle_ for possession of him

was a royal struggle, fought without gloves yet very fairly. All the

same I caught myself doubting once or twice whether any boy could at the

same time be so human and so inhuman. It is to Mr. BRETT YOUNG'S credit

that these doubts do not interfere with one's enjoyment of his book, and

the reason is that he is first and last and all the time an artist.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _New Clerk._ "BEG PARDON, SIR, BUT THERE'S A GENTLEMAN

OUTSIDE WHO SAYS THAT YOU'VE ROBBED HIM OF ALL HE HAD."

_Turf Accountant._ "WELL, WHAT'S HIS NAME? ASK HIM TO GIVE YOU HIS NAME.

HOW AM I TO DISTINGUISH HIM IF HE DOESN'T SEND HIS NAME IN?"]

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 159, 1920-10-06 · 第 55 / 55 题