This meant business, and the inhabitants of Fitchburg drew up a spirited

remonstrance, in which they were joined by the people in those portions

of the three adjoining towns not included in the proposed new township.

In this remonstrance every statement of the petitioners was denied, and

the whole thing denounced as visionary. This matter engrossed the

attention of both parties during 1790, and the result was that the

General Court refused to incorporate the new town.

After such a vigorous contest a brief breathing spell was necessary; but

Sept. 7, 1791, the town voted, forty-one to twenty-three, "to erect a

new meeting-house in the centre of the town, or in the nearest

convenientest place thereto." This double-barrelled superlativeness

shows that the spirit of the people was by no means cast down by the

fruitless struggle of five years. At this meeting a committee was

appointed to plan a new house. Oct. 10, this committee reported to the

town "to build a house sixty by forty-six feet, with a porch at each end

twelve by eleven feet, with stairs into the galleries." There were to be

forty-six pews on the ground floor, and twenty-five in the galleries, to

be sold to the highest bidders, and three years were to be allowed in

which to build the house. This report was accepted at a meeting held

Nov. 14, 1791. A committee was also chosen to clear a site upon the land

purchased of Thomas Boynton and build the house. Dec. 27, 1791, the town

with its usual consistency voted "to dismiss the committee chosen to

build a new meeting-house from further service." Thus the matter again

stood as at the beginning.

For nearly three years thereafter the pot continued to boil, but nothing

more was done about church affairs in town meeting, except that on May

17, 1793, the people showed their obstinacy by refusing "to repair the

meeting-house windows, and to paint the outside of the meeting-house."

Sept. 3, 1794, operations were again renewed by voting "to erect a

meeting-house in the centre of the town, or in the nearest convenientest

place thereto, to accommodate the inhabitants thereof for divine

worship." Three disinterested individuals, Joseph Stearns and David

Kilburn of Lunenburg, and Benjamin Kimball of Harvard, were chosen by

ballot as a committee to discover that much-to-be-desired spot, "the

nearest convenientest place to the centre." They found the centre to be

a little less than a quarter of a mile north-east of the pound, but

considered the most eligible location for the house to be about a half a

mile south of this point, which would have placed it near the present

junction of Main and River Streets. Oct. 21 a meeting was called to

hear their report and it was rejected 36 to 29. So the opinions of

interested and disinterested persons seem to have been considered of

about equal value--as good for nothing.

Nov. 21, 1794, a motion "to place the meeting-house on the spot where

the committee out of town proposed" was negatived, forty-eight to

forty-five. A committee was then appointed to select a suitable place.

Dec. 1 this committee reported in favor of "setting the meeting-house

near the high bridge, under the hill" (the place the out-of-town

committee had proposed). This report was accepted, sixty-one to

forty-seven. A town meeting was therefore called Jan. 8, 1795, to choose

a committee to purchase the land agreed upon; but at the meeting the

town refused to choose such a committee, and so ended the plan of

building a meeting-house there.

Jan. 26, 1795, the town voted "to erect a meeting-house on the town's

land they purchased of Thomas Boynton, about five rods south-west from a

large white oak tree, and to pattern it after the Leominster

meeting-house." It was to be completed by the last day of December,

1796.

Feb. 9, 1795, the town chose a committee of three "to view Ashburnham

meeting-house, and take a plan of the inside, and consult with Asa

Kendall of Ashby for the mode of finishing the inside, and laying a plan

for building the house." A week later the report of this committee was

heard and accepted, and it was voted to pattern the new house after the

one in Ashburnham. "Likewise voted to have the length of said house

sixty-two by forty-eight feet, the posts to said house to be

twenty-seven feet in length, and that the undertaker to build the house

give bonds, with good bondsmen, to fulfil the contract." The contract

was given to John Putman, Jr. Then followed other town meetings which

regulated the size of joists to be used, and other minor matters that

need not be here dwelt upon, Sept. 1, 1795, a committee of five was

chosen "to stake out and oversee the clearing and levelling of the

meeting-house spot for the underpinning on the town land." At this

meeting it was also voted "that the Selectmen lay out a four-rod road in

the best place to accommodate the travel to the new meeting-house spot."

At this time plans seem to have been perfected, and the prospect of a

new house on the town land tolerably assured; but Oct. 19, 1795,

everything was completely upset. On that day a meeting was called "to

know the sense of the town whether the former vote in placing said

meeting-house should be altered." After some wrangling, it was decided

by a vote of forty-four to thirty "to place the new meeting-house at the

crotch of the roads, near Capt. William Brown's house" (very near the

present junction of Main, Mechanic, and Academy Streets). This decision

was final. It is rather difficult to see how it happened to be, for this

site was a little east of the town land. The opposition put in one final

blow in this way. It was designed to have the house face directly "down

street" and the underpinning was laid with a view to this, but the

opposition party mustered enough strength to change the plan so that it

should face the south and "stand cornerwise to the street."

So the momentous question was finally settled, and early in the summer

of 1796 the raising occurred. This was of course an event of great

importance, and extensive preparations were made to celebrate it. On May

9, 1796, a town meeting was called "to see if the town will make any

provision for the refreshment of the Raisers and also the Spectators

that shall attend upon the raising of the new meeting-house." It was

then and there voted most amicably and unanimously "that the town

provide one barrill W. I. Rum and Loaf Sugar sufficient to make it into

Toddy for refreshment for the Raisers and Spectators that shall attend

the raising of the new meeting-house." A committee was also chosen,

consisting of _Deacon_ Daniel Putman, _Deacon_ Ephraim Kimball, _Deacon_

Kendall Boutelle, Reuben Smith, Joseph Polley, Dr. Jonas Marshall, and

Asa Perry, "to deal out the Liquor to the Raisers and Spectators on

Raising Day." It would seem as if a barrel of rum would suffice to make

enough toddy to satisfy the cravings of all that would gather to witness

this raising, but the people were evidently overflowing with

hospitality, and bound to have a rousing time after waiting for it so

long, for before the adjournment of the meeting it was voted "that the

committee to deal out the Liquor and Sugar sufficient for the Raisers

and Spectators, in case the barrill of W. I. Rum and Sugar already voted

should be insufficient, procure more and bring in their account to the

town for allowance."

This was the only meeting in ten years where there was no contention or

bitterness of feeling. For once these good people were all of the same

mind, and a "barrill of W. I. Rum," which in these days gives rise to

such excited controversy, in the presumably degenerate days of 1796

acted like oil upon the troubled waters.

The raising came off successfully, but it is not definitely stated how

much rum was consumed thereat. However here is a copy of the order to

reimburse Deacon Boutelle for the refreshment expenses.

"Fitchburg, May y'e 12: 1796.

"To Ebenezer Thurston Town treasurer you are hereby Directed to

pay De'n Kendall Boutwell thirty eight Dollars and one Cent it

being for providing Rum and Shugar for the Raising of the new

Meeting house and this with his Rec't shall be your Discharge

for the above sum

D C JOHN THURSTON }

38 1 PAUL WETHERBEE } _Selectmen._"

On the back of this order is written the receipt and settlement as

follows:--

1796

"may y'e 12 Recd a Note in behalf of the Town of fitchburg of

thirty Eight Dollers and one Sent in full of the within Order

"KENDAL BOUTELL"

"April 19:1797 Order Settled with the treasurer"

Such in substance was the controversy about the location of the

meeting-house. The contest was characterized by zeal, obstinacy, and

bitterness, manifested equally by both factions, and so fierce was the

strife that the people of adjoining towns, for miles around, were in the

habit of flocking into Fitchburg to attend town meetings.

The edifice was dedicated Jan. 19, 1797, Rev. Zabdiel Adams of Lunenburg

preaching the sermon. This house became, a few years later, the church

of the First Parish (Unitarian) in Fitchburg, and stood until 1836, when

it was removed, and a brick church, now standing, was built by the

Unitarians on nearly the same site.

FOOTNOTES:

[B] Torrey's "History of Fitchburg," Fitchburg, 1836.

ABBOT ACADEMY.[C]

BY ANNIE SAWYER DOWNS.

[Illustration: ABBOT ACADEMY.]

Joseph Cook says, "Andover, Mass., has founded several new Institutions.

Under the elms on Andover Hill is a study, in which a prayer-meeting was

once held weekly to devise ways and means of doing good. There

originated the first religious newspaper. There began its existence an

American Tract Society which now sifts its printed counsels, like the

dew, over a hemisphere. There, in imitation of a Scottish custom, was

instituted the American missionary monthly concert of prayer, in

response to the wants of an American Missionary Society, also

originating in Andover, and on whose operations now the moon goes not

down by night nor the sun by day. There had its birth the American

Education Society, which to-day rings its college bells all the way from

Niagara to the Yosemite. There was commenced the American Temperance

Society, which in our crowded cities has before it a work of which even

wakeful eyes do not yet see more than a glimpse of the importance." It

was, therefore, natural that the first incorporated school for the

higher education of girls in this Commonwealth should find its

birthplace in Andover; and that the first public meeting of which we

have any record whose sole object was the education of girls, should

have been held in its South parish, Feb. 19, 1828, at the house of James

Locke, Esq. The meeting adjourned after voting "that it was desirable

and necessary a female academy should be established in this place,"

leaving the matter in the hands of a committee who were to raise funds

and see if a lot of land could be obtained. At the next meeting, on the

4th of March, only a fortnight later, this committee reported that the

way was clear to draw up a constitution, buy a lot of land, erect a

brick building two stories high, for which funds should be raised by

subscription, and that the school should be put under the charge of

trustees. These trustees, seven in number, were: Rev. Milton Badger,

pastor of the South Church, Andover; Rev. Samuel C. Jackson, pastor of

the West Parish Church, who served until his death, a period of more

than fifty years; Samuel Farrar, Esq., treasurer of Phillips Academy;

Hon. Hobart Clark, State Senator; Mark Newman, formerly principal of

Phillips Academy; Amos Abbot, Member of Congress, and Amos Blanchard,

succeeded in later years by his son, Rev. Dr. Amos Blanchard of Lowell.

Drs. Badger and Jackson and Esquire Farrar were to draft a constitution,

while Messrs. Clark and Newman were to serve as a building committee.

But, alas! then, as now, it was easy to vote away money, but not easy to

collect it; easy to order buildings begun, but hard to find any way to

pay for them. So at a trustee meeting, July 4, 1828, it was voted that

it was not expedient to erect a building for the Female Academy with

their present means. At the Semi-Centennial of Abbot Academy in June,

1879, several persons were present who remembered the sadness and

disappointment which settled down upon the hearts which had been so

sanguine of success when the plan was first made public. But it is

always darkest just before day, and on July 24, 1828, "most important

information" was communicated at a meeting of the trustees. The first

site selected had not been universally approved. A lady, daughter of Mr.

Adams, then Principal of Phillips Academy, writes, "It was the

determination to put the new academy on Main Street; but many Andover

mothers were dissatisfied, as this was the street most frequented by

Theologues and Phillips boys. My mother and Mrs. Stuart consequently

drew up a petition requesting a change in location. Elizabeth Stuart

(mother of Elizabeth Stuart Phelps) and I circulated said petition. When

we had received a sufficient number of signatures, it was handed to the

trustees, who deemed the 'objections formidable'; so a portion of the

'important information' was that Deacon Mark Newman had presented the

enterprise an acre of land on School Street, and that Madam Sarah Abbot

pledged one thousand dollars to be paid at her death." Esquire Farrar

was ready to advance the money on such security, and it was gratefully

voted to take the deed of Deacon Newman, and begin directly to build

from a plan furnished by Mr. Goddard, Principal-elect. Mr. David Hidden

of Newburyport contracted to do the work, being assisted by Mr. William

Saunders of Cambridge, who, it is said, is proud to claim the honor of

having made the columns which support the front portico. Professor Park,

who came of age the year Abbot Academy was born, and who entered Andover

Theological Seminary the autumn the Academy was building, and who often

amused himself by walking upon the uncovered floor joists, adds his

testimony to that of many contemporary notices which declare the

completed structure, with its fine proportions and classic porch, to be

not only the pride of the town but of Essex County.

[Illustration]

So Abbot Female Academy fell into line with the other beneficent

institutions established by men of kindred blood to its founder, and

who, like her, were enthusiastic in their love for learning, passionate

in their benevolence, and extraordinarily endowed with common sense.

[Illustration: BIRD'S-EYE VIEW OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS.]

[Illustration]

The act of incorporation was passed Jan. 25, 1829; and there is no

record that any opposition was made or any encouragement offered,

although all were aware that it was a pioneer enterprise, for a local

journal says, "Abbot Academy is the first house built in New England by

a corporation for the exclusive work of educating women." Madam Sarah

Abbot not only pledged the one thousand dollars before mentioned, but

advanced additional moneys from time to time when the exigencies

threatened destruction; and so arranged her property before her death in

1848, that two years later, upon the 28th of February, 1850, the

trustees came into possession of a sufficient sum to make the whole

amount $10,109.04. Naturally enough the infant institution took her

name, for, though Abbot Academy has received many donations since

Esquire Farrar electrified her by his decided advice, "Surplus money!

Use it to found an academy in Andover for the education of women!" she

is still its largest as well as its first giver. The grand-daughter[D]

of one Abbot, the daughter of another, and the wife of a third, she led

a secluded life, unillumined by those opportunities for culture which

she appreciated highly for others, and oftentimes, without doubt, like

other great benefactors, half uncertain if the generosity, which to her

more than frugal habits must have seemed excessive, was not as

injudicious as it was unusual. For, as Rev. Phillips Brooks said at a

meeting on behalf of Abbot Academy, in Boston, upon the 12th of January,

at the time the school was founded, great ideas and great processes

which have not yet begun to fulfil themselves had just begun to impress

themselves on men's minds. The old and the new existed together; and

that Madam Abbot, without advantages of early education herself, could

so entirely have appreciated them that she was willing to bestow her all

upon the new scheme, speaks volumes for her strength and foresight. Her

portrait, probably painted by T. Buchanan Read, still hangs on the wall

of the pleasant hall built by her timely liberality; and women,

scattered all the way from Maine to Japan, as they recall its sagacious

features, quaint dress, and old-time air, say to their pupils, or record

in their books, or whisper lovingly to the little children round their

knees, that old Mrs. Abbot in far-off Andover was their real Alma Mater.

[Illustration: PLAN OF BASEMENT

ADMINISTRATION BUILDING

ABBOT ACADEMY

ANDOVER, MASS.

H. W. HARTWELL & W. C. RICHARDSON ARCHITECTS

68 DEVONSHIRE ST., BOSTON, MASS.]

May 6, 1829, Abbot Academy opened with eighty-five pupils, from the

little ones who did not know their letters, to young women of eighteen

and twenty. One who was there says, "Henrietta Jackson (afterwards Mrs.

Dr. Cyrus Hamlin) sat at my left." Another describes the three gifted

daughters of Professor Stuart, one of whom became the first wife of

Professor Phelps and the mother of Elizabeth Stuart Phelps, who in her

turn has likewise been a pupil of the school. As we look over the list

of the girls who went in and out under the Ionic porch of the new

academy, we see they were by inheritance and nature well worthy the

broad and generous course of study marked out for them by Dr Jackson,

Samuel Farrar and the others. That course, of more than half a century

ago, was as wide as any laid down in the women's colleges to-day; and

although it was gradually modified in conformity with popular sentiment,

still it speaks well for the sagacity and practical wisdom of the

trustees. It is pleasant to note that Dr. Jackson lived to see his

theories of women's education carried into practice by the establishment

of colleges for them. Mr. Charles Goddard, grandson of Dr. Langdon,

president of Harvard University, was the first principal of Abbot

Academy. He was tall and fine looking, with refined and polished

manners, worshipped by the little girls and greatly admired by the older

ones, who, as one of their number writes "woke up wonderfully and

enjoyed their studies exceedingly." "It was the universal opinion," says

another, "that the advantages offered by Abbot Academy were very

superior to anything in the region, and the building was considered

commodious and elegant." French and German were taught by Dr. William

Gottlieb Schauffler, whose romantic history and extraordinary musical

gifts had already attracted much personal interest, and whose after

career has made his name a household word from the shores of the German

Ocean to the Stairs of the Bosphorus. Who wonders that he was a hero to

those girls of fifty years ago? No theological student called upon them

who had not some story to tell of his enthusiasm, daring or cleverness,

and how eagerly must they have listened as the adventures of his magic

flute were dwelt upon.

[Illustration: PLAN OF FIRST FLOOR

ADMINISTRATION BUILDING

ABBOT ACADEMY

ANDOVER, MASS.

H. W. HARTWELL & W. C. RICHARDSON ARCHITECTS

68 DEVONSHIRE ST., BOSTON, MASS.]

For twenty-one years Abbot Academy was under the charge of principals

who were all college graduates and men of exceptional powers, uncommon

cultivation, and thorough interest in their work. There was no fund

(then as now it depended upon its fees, systematically as low as

possible) to pay running expenses, and although its superior character

as a school attracted as many pupils as it could accommodate it had a

hard struggle to live. Very early in its existence it was evident that

its great lack was a boarding-house for students from a distance, and

many attempts were made to remedy the deficiency. If the principal had a

family, he accommodated all he could; the trustees provided for several

brief periods common tables, but generally they lived in private houses

scattered about the village.

In 1853 two great events took place. The first was the offering of the

principalship to a woman, and the second the resolve of the trustees

"that it is indispensable to the prosperity, and even perpetuity of the

Academy, to raise the sum of eight thousand dollars in order to procure

suitable accommodations for the boarding pupils." Although the link may

not be apparent, the second is really the logical result of the first

for it was the enthusiasm of Miss Nancy J. Haseltine, who had accepted

the position of principal, that urged them on with an irresistible

force. She had come to them from Townsend, Mass., bringing a large

following of pupils, and she found it impossible to provide for them

satisfactorily, besides she saw clearly, as the Punchard Free School was

opened in Andover that year, Abbot Academy must henceforth, as time has

proved, depend chiefly upon patronage from out of town. There was no

doubt about the situation of the new building, the only land the

trustees owned was the acre given them by Deacon Newman in 1829; so they

must set it in the rear of the Academy, but where could they get the

money? Again, man's extremity was God's opportunity. Deacon Peter

Smith, who offered the resolution, promised $1,000, Mr. John Smith

$1,500, though in reality the brothers Smith gave before the house was

finished enough to amount to $6,611. Justly was it named Smith Hall, for

its whole cost was but seven thousand thirty-three dollars and

sixty-four cents. But how was the great empty house to be furnished?

Mrs. H. B. Stowe, then living in Andover, talked it over with Mrs. Dr.

Jackson and Mrs. Professor Park and declared a festival should do it.

And the festival did bring in $2,000 which furnished Smith Hall, and

prouder, happier women never slept on Andover Hill than those who had so

courageously and triumphantly carried the plan through.

Smith Hall has now been far more than a quarter of a century the home of

the pupils of the academy, during that portion of the time when they are

not attending to modern languages. Poverty has been its constant

companion, sternly forbidding any unnecessary expenditures, yet it has

always presented a cheerful, even tasteful appearance to strangers, as

well as to the scores of girls who cherish its memory tenderly. The

highly successful term of Miss Nancy J. Haseltine was all too brief, and

after her, Miss Maria J. Brown and Miss Emma L. Taylor, sister of Dr. S.

H. Taylor, filled the last three years of the first thirty of Abbot

Academy. In September, 1859, the present principal, Miss Philena McKeen,

entered upon her duties, bringing with her from Oxford, Ohio, her

sister, Miss Phebe F. McKeen, as first assistant. Miss McKeen's

management of affairs has been as wise as fortunate, as disinterested as

successful, and Abbot Academy now stands among the very first of the

girls' schools in the country.

The New England Magazine, Volume 1, No. 2, February, 1886. The Bay State Monthly, Volume 4, No. 2, February, 1886. · 第 3 / 9 段