It happened, by a singularly fortuitous combination of circumstances,

that I had under my vigilant eye at that time a man who was concerned in

getting up a forgery. In the course of my watch I saw letters passing to

and from the secretary's office of an important railway. It was no part

of my business to report the circumstance. To have done so might have

spoiled the game I was playing; so I took no notice, or rather made no

sign. In less than a week after the delivery of the last letter, about

six o'clock in the evening, my plot was ripe, and I seized my man.

Extraordinary inadvertence, and wonderful care! He had destroyed one

link in the chain I was constructing with his own unconscious aid, but

he had preserved one link in another chain of equal value and utility to

his other foes. On his person I found a note, in cipher it is true, but

written on paper which had an impression of one of the company's seals.

The cipher was, moreover, not so very hard to decipher. A friend, to

whose skill I paid a deserved compliment in my former volume, soon

unravelled that mystery.

Would the reader like to guess what the letter contained? It was a

transcript in cipher of the minute of the board in relation to that case

of damage and compensation! A confederate of the gang, or at least one

of its spies, actually held a confidential situation in the secretary's

office, so near to the heart of the company's innermost secrets that he

could copy the minutes from the book in which their resolutions were

recorded. It was under this guidance the plaintiff instructed the

attorney, employed by the gang for that action, to take his stand upon

800_l._ precisely, and it was through this infamous betrayal of the

company's confidence that the plunderers got the money.

Of course I now handed the document over to the company. The money had,

however, been paid. My prisoner was found guilty on another charge, so

that it was not requisite to prosecute _him_ for the railway fraud. The

clerk was also not prosecuted. He escaped that fate under the shelter of

his respectable connexions. He solemnly assured the directors that he

had not participated in the plunder, that the forger was not one of his

regular associates, that he had learned the cipher, but as an amusement,

playfully, and that he merely told him the effect of the board's

resolution in order that he might induce his friend, the plaintiff (who

he supposed had been indeed hurt), not to persist in his excessive

demand. The directors believed, or affected to believe, this story.

Perhaps they did not like it to transpire that fraud and villany had

nestled in their head-quarters, and so near to the very centre of their

administration. However that may have been, I know that they

reprimanded, censured, and dismissed the clerk, and that they abstained

from his prosecution.

When this young gentleman, who had copied the minute, was discharged,

the company imagined no doubt that they had weeded out the fraudulent

elements which tainted their confidence. How great their mistake was

will now appear. The matter I am about to speak of occurred only about

twelve months after the episode just narrated.

It so happened that, at the date of this grand "plant," a clerk attached

to the chief cashier's office, whose duty it was to convey the wages

down the main line, had arranged to take his annual month's holiday and

to start on Friday--the day on which he had always delivered out the

money.

"What is to be done about the wages, sir, this week?" the clerk inquired

of the chief cashier.

"Oh, that's easily managed, Wilson," replied that gentleman; "you must

pay on Thursday."

"Thank you, sir. But shall I telegraph to the stations and tell them we

pay this week on Thursday?"

"That may be as well, Wilson," added the chief cashier.

Now, whether any message was handed to the telegraph-clerk by Wilson, or

not, is a mystery yet unsolved. He says that he did so. The

telegraph-clerk says he did not. Between these conflicting statements

there hangs a painful suspicion to this day. It would seem only probable

that the liar was a confederate of the gang, but that is not a certain

inference. The written message may have been handed by Wilson to one of

his fellow-clerks in the chief cashier's office, in a confusion or

excitement resulting from his impending holiday; or it may have been

inadvertently placed aside by the telegrapher, and one of his associates

may have destroyed it in order to favour the criminal enterprise which

its suppression (from whatever cause arising) did render possible.

The board of directors could not, and perhaps could not be reasonably

expected to judge between the conflicting declarations of the two

clerks, so they dismissed both from their situations, and thought they

had done all which impartial justice and their duty to the shareholders

required.

The only certain fact is a negative one. The telegraphic message was not

sent. The wages were looked for, and looked for in vain, on the Friday.

Wilson, laden with a good round sum of money, went down the line on

Thursday, as he had arranged with his chief. He went, as ill luck would

have it, according to his promise in the telegram, by an afternoon

express, and, as if the elements favoured the fraud, a heavy autumnal

mist, nearly amounting to a fog, lasted during the whole of his journey;

although I don't know that events would have taken any other form or

colour if the day had been distinguished by sunshine.

As Wilson approached each station the train slackened speed, according

to usage when he travelled by it on such an errand, and he put out his

head from the carriage in which he enjoyed a separate compartment. As

soon as it appeared he was greeted by a friend--or at least some one who

knew his features very well.

"Good afternoon, Mr. Wilson. You're early this week. Never too soon to

take money. Hope you'll enjoy your holiday, Mr. Wilson."

These sentences embody the pleasant wishes of his quondam friends, and

with slight variations confirm the letter, as well as the substance, of

all the greetings he received.

As each friend so greeted the clerk he took the money designed for a

particular station, and in double quick time the train was again in

motion.

In some cases the train didn't stop at all. The money was dropped out

much in the way that mail bags are dropped; an attendant being on this

Thursday, as on previous Fridays, in readiness to meet the expected

boon.

At one station--it was a large station--a man, who was there patiently

waiting to receive the cash from Mr. Wilson, was disappointed. An old

acquaintance caught a glimpse of the cash-clerk as the train slackened

speed.

After a moment's shaking of hands Wilson offered the station-clerk the

money.

"Here it is," said Wilson.

"What?" inquired the other.

"The screw."

"It's only Thursday."

"Yes; I'm off to-morrow for my holiday."

"Oh! very well. It's just as welcome to-day as to-morrow, I dare say;

but why didn't you say you were coming to-day? 'Pon my word, I wasn't

looking out for you; and what an awful lark it would have been if you

had had to take the money back to London!"

"I did telegraph on Monday."

"The d--l you did! The gaffer never told me any thing about it. It's

just like him; but never mind, I'm mum about his carelessness. He's a

good sort."

The train moved on again, and the expectant thief went empty away.

From another station the money was lost. That is to say, it reached

neither the hands for which it was intended by the company's cashier,

nor those who laid a plan to divert it into other channels. It went in a

direction that neither party contemplated.

The train did not stop at this station, and a man was there to receive

the money, but his movements had, he thought, been noticed. He was

cautious--perhaps needlessly timid. He thought that as the train

approached two faces were peering at him from the station-master's

office. So he turned, went into the station, asked when the next

down-train which stopped at that station would arrive, and sneaked away.

Wilson arrived at this station in due course, and saw what he took to be

a man in waiting for him. Unluckily the wheels did not properly bite the

rails, owing to the damp and their slipperyness, so that he had not

sufficient time for observation, although the condition of the

atmosphere rendered careful notice doubly requisite. Into the hands, as

he supposed, of the official in waiting, the incautious (and I think I

must, after all fair allowances, say very negligent) clerk dropped his

packet, which lay there unnoticed until morning.

An old man and woman, passengers by the market train, then saw it,

picked it up, took it home, said nothing, but inserted it in a hole up

the cottage chimney for a long while; after which they informed the

parson of the parish that an uncle of the husband's mother had sent this

money to them. It was the amount of a legacy. The clergyman thought it

remarkable that this money should be received abruptly, without his

knowing a word about any previous correspondence with lawyers; but the

parson was not a suspicious man, and he made no inquiries.

The sum, although not large (only about 53_l._), was very much more than

the usual weekly apportionment to the station where it was dropped. The

wages there were not more than 8_l._ per week. There was, however, a sum

due from the company to a cattle-dealer, as compensation for the

unpublished destruction of a part of his freight; and this was forwarded

along with the wages to the station-master, with strict directions about

the form of the receipt he was to take for it.

The clergyman advised that the money should be laid out under the

guidance of Messrs. Seal and Delivery, highly respectable solicitors in

the neighbouring town of H----. He gave an introduction to those

gentlemen by a letter, which explained the matter as it had been

explained to him; and this introduction, and his explanation, saved all

inquiries as to the source of the funds, which they profitably invested

for the childless couple, who will never enjoy a penny of it.

The two miscarriages I have mentioned were the only failures of the plan

of the gang to capture one whole week's wages throughout the line of the

Great ---- Railway Company.

Next day (Friday) Mr. Wilson went on his holiday trip to Paris. The

company's servants were expecting him, as usual--except at the one

station to which a misadventure had taken the money intended for its

use. It is needless to say that no Mr. Wilson and no money reached

either of these places from London, as expected. Until rather late in

the afternoon, when the chief cashier's office was closed, and that

exalted functionary and all his clerks had gone home, nothing was said

about the affair. It had not indeed until then become very remarkable;

but as soon as the fact became the subject of particular notice, it rose

to the magnitude of a grievance, and threatened to become a scandal.

"We've had no money, and ain't likely to get none till to-morrow," said

a porter at one of the extremest stations to the guard of an up-train.

"Oh, bosh; don't come that, you know. I sha'n't lend you another

shilling in a hurry," retorted the guard, who had two days before lent

that small amount to the friendly porter.

"'Pon my soul, we ain't," rejoined the porter; and he appealed to his

fellow-servants for a corroboration, which they supplied.

"It will be all right to-morrow," said the guard. "I suppose the chief

cashier has got a headache and hasn't been to the office, or Wilson has

got the belly-ache, or some fine thing or other. Well, it's lucky for me

my old woman isn't without a pound; so she can go to market, if we are

as bad off at our station as you are here; and I suppose we're all in

the same pickle."

The porters were less philosophical. All their domestic and personal

arrangements were planned on the theory of a week's wages on Friday, and

no other day. The wives might have been allowed to postpone the purchase

of the Sunday joint and the rest of the needful week's supply of

provision, but every man had engagements which could not be so easily

deferred. Every Friday night the porters assembled at a "public" to

spend a convivial hour. Was this enjoyment to be sacrificed, or even

postponed? It was more than human nature, cast in the railway-porter

mould, could endure without protests as loud as they were deep. Were

they to be laughed at, and jeered at, and told that the company was

insolvent, that their masters couldn't pay their wages? It was too bad.

Hadn't they feelings as well as a secretary, or a general manager, or a

director, or the chairman of a board? That was what they would like to

know. They meant to say it was shameful, scandalous, atrocious, and

abominable, and worthy of harsher terms of description. This is not only

what they meant to say, it is what they did say.

During the night the news had circulated up and down the line, and over

all its tributaries. In the morning it was known to the secretary and

the chief cashier. The circumstances of the case were so peculiar, that

these leading functionaries did not feel themselves competent to deal

with it. The secretary hastened to confer with the chairman of the

board, who again consulted two of his colleagues, who happened to be in

Town, and, in consequence, certain steps were taken.

In the first place a cheque was drawn upon the company's bankers for the

amount they had been robbed of--exactly 2310_l._ 18_s._ 6_d._; and a

clerk was despatched to all the stations for the satisfaction and

comfort of all the indignant servants, who had now grown clamorous for

their wages.

Wilson's conduct was the topic of serious consideration. Could he have

run away with the money? How could the robbery have been effected

without his participation or connivance? What was his previous

character? What sort of references did he bring to the company when he

first entered its service, now five years ago? The latter questions were

answered satisfactorily; the former were not. The chief cashier echoed a

general opinion when he declared that he did not think Wilson capable of

such a villanous and wholesale robbery. Yet the chairman of the board

and the secretary did not see how the thing could have been perpetrated

without his connivance, or, they thought, indeed without his active

participation. They asked again and again, How could it have been done

in despite of his vigilance? They searched the papers, and examined the

"Clerks' Reference Book" to see what sort of references he gave when

engaged as one of their servants. Nothing could be more satisfactory

than these. Their distinctness, emphasis, and verisimilitude were, it

would seem, an adequate guarantee for his fidelity in any place. Yet

again and again these very inquiries landed them upon the question, How

could it have happened without at least his connivance? His mode of

life, his habits, and his manners, conversation, tone of thought, and

known tastes, were repugnant to the theory of his criminality. Yet

again, here the chairman of the board ventured to say that he had heard

of rascals who covered the most nefarious designs, and even found their

opportunities for the commission of crime, in the well-sustained outward

show of virtue. He was absolutely sure that that fellow Wilson was at

the bottom, if not also at the top, of the crime.

The solicitors to the company were instructed to take such steps as they

might think fit in the case. They consulted me, and I gave it as my

decided opinion that the facts were as consistent with the innocence of

the clerk as with his guilt. This was a view of the matter which had not

occurred to the solicitors. Lawyers have a kind of second instinct,

which always makes them lean to the dark side of conduct and of events.

Of criminal lawyers this is especially true. A regular Old-Bailey

practitioner cannot understand a theory of innocence. It would be far

more easy to convince any judge or jury of the guiltlessness of an

accused man or woman, than it would that able and accomplished gentleman

with the hooked nose and guttural voice, who is known as the "thieves'

attorney-general," in the City of London. But what does he care about

the guilt or innocence of his clients? Literally nothing. Under the

genial influence of a fee, he will speak as eloquently (in his own and

in some other person's opinion) and contend as loudly that his client is

really guiltless, whether he be so or not. If any thing, as he has often

had occasion to say, he likes to have a confession of crime from the

accused, because then he knows that the client is not humbugging him; he

relies upon a knowledge of the worst; he is sure that no facts are being

concealed from him; and he can tell how far it is safe to carry his

objurgations or his cross-examination of witnesses. The company's

solicitors were, it is true, not men of this precise stamp. Still, they

had in their professional career seen so very much of the corrupt and

evil in mankind, and so very little of the higher traits of human

nature, that they were always ready to accept unfavourable hypotheses in

explanation of human conduct, and slow to receive opposite theories in

their place. They were hard to convince that Wilson _might_ be innocent

of all participation in the robbery. At length, however, after carefully

weighing all the reasons I advanced against the immediate arrest and

accusation of the clerk, they admitted it was just possible that he did

not aid the conspirators and thieves otherwise than by his gross and

culpable negligence.

I speedily ascertained how and where Wilson intended to spend his

holiday. It was arranged that I should follow him. If, when I overtook

him, he consented to return with me, I was not to legally arrest him.

In case he should, however, refuse, or manifest any decided

unwillingness to return, warrants for his seizure in Paris and his

rendition were procured, and placed in the hands of an ordinary

detective officer, who accompanied me, and had instructions to obey my

directions.

Thus armed, we proceeded to Paris. To discover the suspected clerk was

not difficult. It was one of the easiest tasks I ever had allotted me. I

found out the hotel he put up at. He was not in when we arrived there,

somewhat early in the evening. I left my companion with the warrants at

the hotel, while I went further, in quest of Mr. Wilson.

I had a special motive for this part of my little arrangement. I did not

think my man would return during my absence from the hotel. I thought it

most likely--as I knew my way about Paris, was acquainted with the

institutions of the gay capital, knew I could get aid from the French

police in my search, and for other reasons--that I should bring Mr.

Wilson back to the hotel, a prisoner in fact, although under no formal

detention. In case I did not discover him out of doors, I resolved to

return alone to the hotel in good time--in all likelihood to meet him

there. I wanted to have the first word with him, and, if I could, to

have that word in the absence of my fellow-traveller, clothed with so

much authority.

And why, the reader may ask, did you want to take this advantage of the

law's proper servant or officer? I did not want any such advantage. I

would have given him an advantage, which might have served his turn at

Scotland Yard, if I could have done so with what I considered fairness

towards the suspected. I did not wish the circumstances of his arrest to

prejudice him with his masters, and it might have been before a criminal

tribunal. My experience of human nature and of society had suggested to

me that this young man might perhaps, when so far from the scene of his

labours, beyond, as he supposed, the eyes and ears of his employers, and

in a holiday mood, visit some places, not thought proper places by many

right-minded folks, of whom I am, at least in this respect, one. As I

felt that the weight of suspicion, before evidence of guilt, already

bore with undue force upon the clerk, I thought it wrong to let the

weight of another element (however fair in itself) be added to the

burden of prejudice. If I had then been, as I have on other occasions

often been, employed to watch leisure movements and scan the holiday

pursuits of a clerk, so that his masters might by my report determine

whether or not he were fit to hold a position of trust, I should have

had no desire to screen the incidents of Mr. Wilson's visit to Paris.

Here I saw or thought I saw it my duty to bring him back to London, in

order that he might render such explanations as he could about a

particular crime. To do this effectually, I argued that it was

desirable, for his sake truly, but also for the interests of justice,

that he should encounter no prejudice which the clerks' reference book,

his antecedents, and his general conduct did not warrant. This, I hope

the reader will see, was but an act of simple justice to the suspected.

Let me add, that I foresaw, if the clerk were really innocent, but if

prejudice led to his wrongful arrest, the true culprits would have had

an effective warning to destroy any clue while their pursuers were on

the wrong track. Whatever the reader may think, I am candid enough to

say, will not alter my conviction that I acted so far prudently and

justly.

I found Wilson, costumed a little _outre_, in a "fast" dancing-room of

the French capital. A gendarme pointed him out as a new arrival. An

inspection of my photograph satisfied me of his identity.

I accosted him as "Mr. Wilson?"

"That's my name."

"I know it perfectly well. I want to speak with you."

"Who are you? What's your name? What have you got to say to me?"

"If you step aside to the other end of the gallery, and leave this

pretty little lady here, I'll tell you."

"You be--"

I stopped the remainder of the sentence by a look which terrified him.

I whispered in his ear that I wanted him, and should, if he did not obey

me, call upon the police, who were in force in and about this haunt of

folly and vice, to arrest him, on a charge of robbing his employers,

the ---- Railway Company, of 2310_l._ 18_s._ 6_d._; but that if he

followed me back to his hotel, and from thence to London, he would have

an opportunity of rendering any explanation of the case which lay in his

power.

He extricated himself from his frail companion, and we proceeded

together to the end of the gallery, where conversation, unheard by the

disinterested, was possible; and I told him in greater detail the

circumstances of the robbery. He naturally denied all knowledge of the

affair; said he was entirely unable to account for it; and, although it

was plain to see the terror inspired by a bare suspicion against him, he

expressed an ardent wish to return with me to England, and lend all the

assistance he could in the discovery of the culprits.

I explained my reasons for not allowing my friend with the warrants to

arrest Wilson. He was very grateful. I told him that if he followed me

out I would allow him to make his way, under my eye, to one of the least

objectionable of the cafés on the Boulevards, where I should take him

into my custody. The poor wretch was glad enough to avail himself of

this privilege.

I telegraphed my success that night. By an early train next morning we

took our journey homewards, and arrived in London the same evening in

due course. Mr. Wilson consented to become my guest for the evening, and

until either the stress of duty compelled me to hand him over to the

police, or I had the pleasure of announcing that he was no longer under

restraint.

The day after my return to London there was a solemn conference at the

head-quarters of the ---- Railway. That august assembly, the board, had

been hastily convened, and had a special meeting. The whole matter was

investigated by the light of facts now within the knowledge of its

officers and advisers. Other minor and auxiliary conferences were held

in ante-rooms between myself and the leading partner of the firm who

enjoyed the lucrative and honourable appointment of solicitors to the

company. The results of the whole deliberations put together were, a

resolution not to prosecute the suspected clerk, because there was not

enough evidence at hand to warrant a conviction; and another resolution,

that as there was more than enough evidence to justify a strong

suspicion of his complicity in the affair--as there was abundant proof

of gross negligence--the clerk Wilson should be dismissed.

One victim not being sufficient to compensate for the loss of so much

money, the two other clerks--one in the chief cashier's and one in the

telegraph department--were also deprived of their situations.

Secret Service; or, Recollections of a City Detective · 第 13 / 19 段