NATIONAL DEFENSE

Being a nation relying not on force, but on fair dealing and good will, to

maintain peace with others, we have provided a moderate military force in a

form adapted solely to defense. It should be continued with a very generous

supply of officers and with the present base of personnel, subject to

fluctuations which may be temporarily desirable.

The five-year program for our air forces is in keeping with this same

policy and commensurate with the notable contributions of America to the

science of aeronautics. The provisions of the law lately enacted are being

executed as fast as the practical difficulties of an orderly and stable

development permit.

While our Army is small, prudence requires that it should be kept in a high

state of efficiency and provided with such supplies as would permit of its

immediate expansion. The garrison ration has lately been increased.

Recommendations for an appropriation of $6,166,000 for new housing made to

the previous Congress failed to pass. While most of the Army is well

housed, some of it which is quartered in wartime training camps is becoming

poorly housed. In the past three years $12,533,000 have been appropriated

for reconstruction and repairs, and an authorization has been approved of

$22,301,000 for new housing, under which $8,070,000 has already been

appropriated. A law has also been passed, complying with the request of the

War Department, allocating funds received from the sale of buildings and

land for housing purposes. The work, however, is not completed, so that

other appropriations are being recommended.

Our Navy is likewise a weapon of defense. We have a foreign commerce and

ocean lines of trade unsurpassed by any other country. We have outlying

territory in the two great oceans and long stretches of seacoast studded

with the richest cities in the world. We are responsible for the protection

of a large population and the greatest treasure ever bestowed upon any

people. We are charged with an international duty of defending the Panama

Canal. To meet these responsibilities we need a very substantial sea

armament. It needs aircraft development, which is being provided under the

five-year program. It needs submarines as soon as the department decides

upon the best type of construction. It needs airplane carriers and a

material addition to its force of cruisers. We can plan for the future and

begin a moderate building program.

This country has put away the Old World policy of competitive armaments. It

can never be relieved of the responsibility of adequate national defense.

We have one treaty secured by an unprecedented attitude of generosity on

our part for a limitation in naval armament. After most careful

preparation, extending over months, we recently made every effort to secure

a three-power treaty to the same end. We were granted much cooperation by

Japan, but we were unable to come to an agreement with Great Britain. While

the results of the conference were of considerable value, they were mostly

of a negative character. We know now that no agreement can be reached which

will be inconsistent with a considerable building program on our part. We

are ready and willing to continue the preparatory investigations on the

general subject of limitation of armaments which have been started under

the auspices of the League of Nations.

We have a considerable cruiser tonnage, but a part of it is obsolete.

Everyone knew that had a three-power agreement been reached it would have

left us with the necessity of continuing our building program. The failure

to agree should not cause us to build either more or less than we otherwise

should. Any future treaty of limitation will call on us for more ships. We

should enter on no competition. We should refrain from no needful program.

It should be made clear to all the world that lacking a definite agreement,

the attitude of any other country is not to be permitted to alter our own

policy. It should especially be demonstrated that propaganda will not cause

us to change our course. Where there is no treaty limitation, the size of

the Navy which America is to have will be solely for America to determine.

No outside influence should enlarge it or diminish it. But it should be

known to all that our military power holds no threat of aggrandizement. It

is a guaranty of peace and security at home, and when it goes abroad it is

an instrument for the protection of the legal rights of our citizens under

international law, a refuge in time of disorder, and always the servant of

world peace. Wherever our flag goes the rights of humanity increase.

State of the Union Addresses(#5036) · 第 107 / 172 题