FEDERAL REGULATION

I am in favor of reducing, rather than expanding, Government bureaus which

seek to regulate and control the business activities of the people.

Everyone is aware that abuses exist and will exist so long as we are

limited by human imperfections. Unfortunately, human nature can not be

changed by an act of the legislature. When practically the sole remedy for

many evils lies in the necessity of the people looking out for themselves

and reforming their own abuses, they will find that they are relying on a

false security if the Government assumes to hold out the promise that it is

looking out for them and providing reforms for them. This principle is

preeminently applicable to the National Government. It is too much assumed

that because an abuse exists it is the business of the National Government

to provide a remedy. The presumption should be that it is the business of

local and State governments. Such national action results in encroaching

upon the salutary independence of the States and by undertaking to

supersede their natural authority fills the land with bureaus and

departments which are undertaking to do what it is impossible for them to

accomplish and brings our whole system of government into disrespect and

disfavor. We ought to maintain high standards. We ought to punish

wrongdoing. Society has not only the privilege but the absolute duty of

protecting itself and its individuals. But we can not accomplish this end

by adopting a wrong method. Permanent success lies in local, rather than

national action. Unless the locality rises to its own requirements, there

is an almost irresistible impulse for the National Government to intervene.

The States and the Nation should both realize that such action is to be

adopted only as a last resort.

State of the Union Addresses(#5036) · 第 94 / 172 题