CHAPTER XXXII.

Glimpses of Social Life in the Seventeenth Century--Literature and

Literary Men--Keating--the Four Masters--Colgan--Ward--Usher--Ware--

Lynch--Trade--Commerce depressed by the English--Fairs--Waterford

Rugs--Exportation of Cattle forbidden--State of Trade in the Principal

Towns--Population--Numbers employed in different Trades--Learned

Professions--Physicians--Establishment of their College in

Dublin--Shopkeepers--Booksellers--Coffee-houses--Clubs--Newspapers--

Fashionable Churches--Post-houses and Post-offices established--

Custom-house--Exchange--Amusements--Plays at the Castle--The First

Theatre set up in Werburgh-street--Domestics Manners and Dress--

Food-A Country Dinner Party in Ulster.

[A.D. 1600-1700.]

Notwithstanding the persecutions to which the Irish had been subjected

for so many centuries, they preserved their love of literature, and the

cultivated tastes for which the Celt has been distinguished in all ages.

Indeed, if this taste had not existed, the people would have sunk into

the most degraded barbarism; for education was absolutely forbidden, and

the object of the governing powers seems to have been to reduce the

nation, both intellectually and morally, as thoroughly as possible. In

such times, and under such circumstances, it is not a little remarkable

to find men devoting themselves to literature with all the zest of a

freshman anticipating collegiate distinctions, while surrounded by

difficulties which would certainly have dismayed, if they did not

altogether crush, the intellects of the present age. I have already of

the mass of untranslated national literature existing country and in

continental libraries. These treasures of mental labour are by no means

confined to one period of our history; but it could scarcely be expected

that metaphysical studies or the fine arts could flourish at a period

when men's minds were more occupied with the philosophy of war than with

the science of Descartes, and were more inclined to patronize a new

invention in the art of gunnery, than the _chef d'oeuvre_ of a limner or

sculptor. The Irish language was the general medium of conversation in

this century. No amount of Acts of Parliament had been able to repress

its use, and even the higher classes of English settlers appear to have

adopted it by preference. Military proclamations were issued in this

language;[512] or if the Saxon tongue were used, it was translated for

the general benefit into the vernacular. During the Commonwealth,

however, the English tongue made some way; and it is remarkable that the

English-speaking Irish of the lower classes, in the present day, have

preserved the idioms and the accentuation used about this period. Many

of the expressions which provoke the mirth of the modern Englishman, and

which he considers an evidence of the vulgarity of the uneducated Irish,

may be found in the works of his countrymen, of which he is most justly

proud.

The language of Cromwell's officers and men, from whom the Celt had such

abundant opportunities of learning English, was (less the cant of

Puritanism) the language of Shakspeare, of Raleigh, and of Spenser. The

conservative tendencies of the Hibernian preserved the dialect intact,

while causes, too numerous for present detail, so modified it across the

Channel, that each succeeding century condemned as vulgarism what had

been the highest fashion with their predecessors. Even as Homeric

expressions lingered for centuries after the blind bard's obit had been

on record, so the expressions of Chaucer, Spenser, and Shakspeare, may

still be discovered in provincial dialects in many parts of the British

Isles. I do not intend to quote _Tate and Brady_ as models of

versification and of syntax; but if the best poets of the age did not

receive the commission to translate the Psalms into verse, it was a poor

compliment to religion. We find the pronunciation of their rhymes

corresponding with the very pronunciation which is now condemned as

peculiarly Irish. Newton also rhymes _way_ and _sea_, while one can

scarcely read a page of Pope[513] without finding examples of

pronunciation now supposed to be pure Hibernicism. In the Authorized

Protestant version of the Bible, _learn_ is used in the sense of _to

teach_, precisely as it is used in Ireland at the present day: "If thy

children shall keep my covenant and my testimonies that I shall _learn_

them" and their use of the term _forninst_ is undoubtedly derived from

an English source, for we find it in Fairfax's _Tasso_.[514]

History and theology were the two great studies of the middle ages, and

to these subjects we find the _literati_ of Ireland directing special

attention. The importance and value of Latin as a medium of literary

intercommunication, had been perceived from an early period: hence that

language was most frequently employed by Irish writers after it had

become known in the country. It is unquestionably a national credit,

that no amount of suffering, whether inflicted for religious or

political opinions, deprived the Irish of historians.[515] Some of their

works were certainly compiled under the most disadvantageous

circumstances.

None of the writers whom we shall presently enumerate, worked for hope

of gain, or from any other motive save that of the purest patriotism.

Keating, whose merits are becoming more and more recognized since modern

research has removed Celtic traditions from the region of fable to the

tableland of possibility, wrote his _History_ principally in the Galtee

Mountains, where he had taken refuge from the vengeance of Carew,[516]

Lord President of Munster. Although he had received a high education in

the famous College of Salamanca, for the sake of his people he preferred

suffering persecution, and, if God willed it, death, to the peaceful

life of literary quiet which he might have enjoyed there. He wrote in

his mother-tongue, although master of many languages; and in consequence

of this choice his work remained in MS. for many years. When it came to

light, those who were ignorant of the MS. materials of ancient Irish

history, were pleased to suppose that he had invented a considerable

portion, and supplied the remainder from the _viva voce_ traditions of

the country people. Unfortunately, he was not sufficiently master of the

science of criticism to give the authorities which he had used so

carefully, and to prove their value and authenticity. But truth has at

length triumphed. Several of the works from which he has quoted have

been discovered; and it has been shown that, wild as some of his legends

may read in the garb in which he has given them, there is proof that

important facts underlie the structure, though it has been somewhat

overembellished by a redundant fancy.

[Illustration: TUBRID CHURCHYARD--BURIAL-PLACE OF THE HISTORIAN

KEATING.]

Keating was also a poet. Many of his pieces are still well known and

highly popular in Munster, and copies of nearly all of them are

preserved by the Royal Irish Academy. One of his ballads has been

"coaxed" into verse by D'Arcy M'Gee, in his _Gallery of Irish Writers_.

It is entitled "Thoughts on Innisfail." I shall give one verse as a

specimen, and as an illustration of the popular feelings of the time:

"And the mighty of Naas are mighty no more,

Like the thunders that boomed 'mid the banners of yore;

And the wrath-ripened fields, 'twas they who could reap them;

Till they trusted the forsworn, no foe could defeat them."

[Illustration: INSCRIPTION IN HONOUR OF KEATING.]

The poet-priest must have died at an advanced age, though the precise

date of his demise has not been ascertained. He has also left some

religious works; and his "Shaft of Death" is well known and much admired

both by divines and Celtic scholars.[517]

O'Sullivan Beare's history is too well known to require more than a

passing mention. It was said that he wrote as fiercely as he fought.

Archbishop Usher, with whom he had many a literary feud, appears to have

been of this opinion; for, after having described O'Sullivan as an

"egregious liar," he was so sensitive to any counter abuse he might

receive in return, that he carefully cut out every disparaging epithet

which the historian used from the copy of his reply, which at present

lies, with Usher's other works, in the Library of Trinity College,

Dublin.

The Four Masters are included amongst the Irish writers of this century,

but I have already given ample details of their labours. The _Acta

Sanctorum_ of Colgan, and Ward's literary efforts in a foreign land for

his country, are beyond all praise. Usher and Ware were also amongst the

giants of these days; and, considering the state of political and

religious excitement amongst which they lived and wrote, it is

incomparably marvellous that they should not have dipped their pens

still deeper into the gall of controversy and prejudice. Usher was one

of the _Hibernis ipsis Hiberniores_, for his family came to Ireland with

King John; but he admired and wrote Celtic history with the enthusiasm

of a Celt, and he gathered materials for other men's work with patient

industry, however he may have allowed party spirit to influence and warp

his own judgment in their use. Usher was Ware's most ardent patron.

Habits of indefatigable research did for him, in some degree, what

natural genius has done for others. Nor was he slow to recognize or

avail himself of native talent; and there can be no doubt, if he had

lived a few years longer after his acquaintance with MacFirbis, that

Irish literature would have benefited considerably by the united efforts

of the man of power, who was devoted to learning, and the man of gifts,

who had the abilities which neither position nor wealth can purchase.

John Lynch, the Bishop of Killala, and the indefatigable and successful

impugner of Cambrensis, was another literary luminary of the age. His

career is a fair sample of the extraordinary difficulties experienced by

the Irish in their attempts to cultivate intellectual pursuits, and of

their undaunted courage in attaining their end. Usher has himself

recorded his visit to Galway, where found Lynch, then a mere youth,

teaching a school of humanity (A.D. 1622). "We had proofe," he says,

"during our continuance in that citie, how his schollars profitted under

him, by the verses and orations which they brought us."[518] Usher then

relates how he seriously advised the young schoolmaster to conform to

the popular religion; but, as Lynch declined to comply with his wishes,

he was bound over, under sureties of £400 sterling, to "forbear

teaching." The tree of knowledge was, in truth, forbidden fruit, and

guarded sedulously by the fiery sword of the law. I cannot do more than

name a few of the other distinguished men of this century. There was

Florence Conry, Archbishop of Tuam, and founder of the Irish College of

Louvain. He was one of the first to suggest and to carry out the idea of

supplying Irish youth with the means of education on the Continent,

which they were denied at home. It is a fact, unexampled in the history

of nations, that a whole race should have been thus denied the means of

acquiring even the elements of learning, and equally unexampled is the

zeal with which the nation sought to procure abroad the advantages from

which they were so cruelly debarred at home. At Louvain some of the most

distinguished Irish scholars were educated. An Irish press was

established within its halls, which was kept constantly employed, and

whence proceeded some of the most valuable works of the age, as well as

a scarcely less important literature for the people, in the form of

short treatises on religion or history. Colleges were also established

at Douay, Lisle, Antwerp, Tournay, and St. Omers, principally through

the exertions of Christopher Cusack, a learned priest of the diocese of

Meath. Cardinal Ximenes founded an Irish College at Lisbon, and Cardinal

Henriquez founded a similar establishment at Evora. It is a remarkable

evidence of the value which has always been set on learning by the

Catholic Church, that even in times of persecution, when literary

culture demanded such sacrifices, she would not admit uneducated persons

to the priesthood. The position which the proscribed Catholic priesthood

held in Ireland at this period, compared with that which the favoured

clergy of the Established Church held in England, is curious and

significant. Macaulay says of the latter: "A young levite--such was the

phrase then in use--might be had for his board, a small garret, and ten

pounds a year; and might not only perform his own professional

functions, but might also save the expenses of a gardener or a groom.

Sometimes the reverend man nailed up the apricots, and sometimes he

curried the coach-horses. He cast up the farrier's bills. He walked ten

miles with a message or a parcel. He was permitted to dine with the

family, but he was expected to content himself with the plainest

fare--till he was summoned to return thanks for the repast, from a great

part of which he had been excluded."[519]

In Ireland there were few learned men in the Established Church, and

even Usher seems to have been painfully indifferent to the necessity of

superior education, as well as regular ordination, for his clergy. In

1623 Dr. Blair was invited to Ireland by Lord Clannaboy, to take the

living of Bangor, vacated by the death of the Rev. John Gibson, "sence

Reformacione from Popary the first Deane of Down." Dr. Blair objected

both to episcopal government and to use the English Liturgy; yet he

"procured a free and safe entry to the holy ministry," which, according

to his own account, was accomplished thus. His patron, Lord Clannaboy,

informed "the Bishop Echlin how opposite I was to episcopacy and their

liturgy, and had the influence to procure my admission on easy and

honorable terms." At his interview with the Bishop, it was arranged that

Dr. Blair was to receive ordination from Mr. Cunningham and the

neighbouring clergy, and the Bishop was "to come in among them in no

other relation than a presbyter." These are the Bishop's own words; and

his reason for ordaining at all was: "I must ordain you, else neither I

nor you can answer the law nor brook the land." In 1627 Blair had an

interview with Archbishop Usher, and he says "they were not so far from

agreeing as he feared." "He admitted that all those things [episcopacy

and a form of prayer] ought to have been removed, but the constitution

and laws of the place and time would not permit that to be done." A few

years later Mr. John Livingstone thus relates his experience on similar

subjects. He had been appointed also by Lord Clannaboy to the parish of

Killinchy; and, "because it was needful that he should be ordained to

the ministry, and the Bishop of Down, in whose diocese Killinchy was,

being a corrupt and timorous man, and would require some engagement,

therefore my Lord Clannaboy sent some with me, and wrote to Mr. Andrew

Knox, Bishop of Raphoe, who told me he knew my errand, and that I came

to him because I had scruples against episcopacy and ceremonies,

according as Mr. Josiah Welsh and some others had done before; and that

he thought his old age was prolonged for little other purpose than to

perform such ceremonies." It was then arranged that he should be

ordained as Dr. Blair and others had been. The Bishop gave him the book

of ordination, and said, "though he durst not answer it to the State,"

that he might draw a line over anything he did not approve of, and that

it should not be read. "But," concludes Mr. Livingstone, "I found that

it had been so marked by some others before, that I needed not mark

anything; so the Lord was pleased to carry that business far beyond

anything that I have thought, or almost ever desired."[520]

Such facts as these were well known to the people; and we can scarcely

be surprised that they increased their reverence for the old clergy, who

made such sacrifices for the attainment of the learning necessary for

their ministry, and who could not minister, even if they would, without

having received the office and authority of a priest by the sacrament of

orders.

But literary efforts in Ireland were not confined to the clergy;

O'Flaherty and MacFirbis devoted themselves with equal zeal to the

dissemination and preservation of knowledge; and we envy not the man who

can read without emotion the gentle complaint of the former, in his

_Ogygia_: "I live a banished man within the bounds of my native soil--a

spectator of others enriched by my birthright." And again: "The Lord

hath wonderfully recalled the royal heir to his kingdom, with the

applause of all good men; but He hath not found me worthy to be restored

to the kingdom of my cottage. Against Thee, O Lord, have I sinned: may

the Lord be blessed for ever!"

The customs and dress of the upper classes in Ireland were probably much

the same as those of a similar rank in England.[521] Commerce was so

constantly restricted by English jealousy, that it had few opportunities

of development. In a curious old poem, called the _Libel of English

Policie_, the object of which was to impress on the English the

necessity of keeping all trade and commerce in their own hands, we find

Irish exports thus enumerated:--

"Hides and fish, salmon, hake, herring,

Irish wool and linen cloth, falding

And masternes good be her marchandie;

Hertes, birds, and others of venerie,

Skins of otter, squirrel and Irish hare,

Of sheep, lambe, and fore is her chaffere,

Felles of kids, and conies great plentie."

It will be observed that this list contains only the natural produce of

the country; and had any attempt been made to introduce or encourage

manufactures, some mention would have been made of them. The silver and

gold mines of the country are alluded to further on, and the writer very

sensibly observes, that if "we [the English] had the peace and good-will

of the wild Irish, the metal might be worked to our advantage." In the

sixteenth century the Irish sent raw and tanned hides, furs, and

woollens to Antwerp,[522] taking in exchange sugar, spices, and mercery.

The trade with France and Spain for wines was very considerable; fish

was the commodity exchanged for this luxury; and even in 1553, Philip

II. of Spain paid[523] £1,000 yearly--a large sum for that period--to

obtain liberty for his subjects to fish upon the north coast of Ireland.

Stafford, in speaking of the capture of Dunboy Castle, says that

O'Sullivan made £500 a-year by the duties which were paid to him by

foreign fishermen, "although the duties they paid were very

little."[524]

Stanihurst has described a fair in Dublin, and another in Waterford,

where he says the wares were "dog-cheap." These fairs continued for six

days, and merchants came to them from Flanders and France, as well as

from England. He gives the Waterford people the palm for commerce,

declares they are "addicted to thieving," that they distil the best

_aqua vitæ_, and spin the choicest rugs in Ireland. A friend of his, who

took a fancy to one of these "choice rugs," being "demurrant in London,

and the weather, by reason of a hard hoar frost, being somewhat nipping,

repaired to Paris Garden, clad in one of the Waterford rugs. The

mastiffs had no sooner espied him, but deeming he had been a bear, would

fain have baited him; and were it not that the dogs were partly muzzled

and partly chained, he doubted not he should have been well tugged in

this Irish rug."

After the plantation of Ulster, Irish commerce was allowed to flourish

for a while; the revenue of the crown doubled; and statesmen should have

been convinced that an unselfish policy was the best for both countries.

But there will always be persons whose private interests clash with the

public good, and who have influence enough to secure their own advantage

at the expense of the multitude. Curiously enough, the temporary

prosperity of Ireland was made a reason for forbidding the exports which

had produced it. A declaration was issued by the English Government in

1637, which expressly states this, and places every possible bar to its

continuance. The Cromwellian settlement, however, acted more effectually

than any amount of prohibitions or Acts of Parliament, and trade was

entirely ruined by it for a time. When it again revived, and live cattle

began to be exported in quantities to England, the exportation was

strictly forbidden. The Duke of Ormonde, who possessed immense tracts of

land in Ireland, presented a petition, with his own hands, against the

obnoxious measure, and cleverly concluded it with the very words used by

Charles himself, in the declaration for the settlement of Ireland at the

Restoration, trusting that his Majesty "would not suffer his good

subjects to weep in one kingdom when they rejoiced in another." Charles,

however, wanted money; so Ireland had to wait for justice. A vote,

granting him £120,000, settled the matter; and though for a time cattle

were smuggled into England, the Bill introduced after the great fire of

London, which we have mentioned in the last chapter, settled the matter

definitively. The Irish question eventually merged into an unseemly

squabble about prerogative, but Charles was determined "never to kiss

the block on which his father lost his head."[525] He overlooked the

affront, and accepted the Bill, "nuisance" and all. One favour, however,

was granted to the Irish; they were graciously permitted to send

contributions of cattle to the distressed Londoners in the form of

salted beef. The importation of mutton, lamb, butter, and cheese, were

forbidden by subsequent Acts, and salted beef, mutton, and pork were not

allowed to be exported from Ireland to England until the general dearth

of 1757.

The commercial status of the principal Irish towns at this period (A.D.

1669), is thus given by Mr. Bonnell, the head collector of Irish customs

in Dublin: "Comparing together the proceeds of the duties for the six

years ending December, 1669, received from the several ports of Ireland,

they may be thus ranked according to their worth respectively, expressed

in whole numbers, without fractions, for more clearness of

apprehension:----

"Rate. Ports. Proportion Rate. Ports Proportion

per cent. per cent.

1 Dublin 40 { Drogheda 3

2 Cork 10 5 { Londonderry 3

{ Waterford 7 { Carrickfergus 3

3 { Galway 7 { Ross 1

{ Limerick 5 { Wexford 1

4 { Kinsale 5 6 { Dundalk 1

{ Youghal 5 { Baltimore 1

{ Sligo 1"

"Killybeg, Dungarvan, Donaghadee, Strangford, Coleraine, and Dingle, are

mentioned as "under rate."

The linen trade had been encouraged, and, indeed, mainly established in

Ireland, by the Duke of Ormonde. An English writer[526] says that

200,000 pounds of yarn were sent annually to Manchester, a supply which

seemed immense in that age; and yet, in the present day, would hardly

keep the hands employed for forty-eight hours. A political economist of

the age gives the "unsettledness of the country" as the first of a

series of reasons why trade did not flourish in Ireland, and, amongst

other remedies, suggests sumptuary laws and a tax upon celibacy, the

latter to weigh quite equally on each sex.[527] Sir William Petty does

not mention the trade but he does mention the enormous amount of

tobacco[528] consumed by the natives. It is still a disputed question

whether the so-called "Danes' pipes," of which I give an illustration,

were made before the introduction of tobacco by Sir Walter Raleigh, or

whether any other narcotizing indigenous plant may have been used. Until

one, at least, of these pipes shall have been found in a position which

will indicate that they must have been left there at an earlier period

than the Elizabethan age, the presumption remains in favour of their

modern use.

[Illustration: "DANES' PIPES," FROM THE COLLECTION OF THE R.I.A.]

I shall now give some brief account of the domestic life of our

ancestors 200 years ago, and of the general state of society, both in

the upper and lower classes. Petty estimates the population of Ireland

at 1,100,000, or 200,000 families. Of the latter he states that 160,000

have no fixed hearths; these, of course, were the very poorest class,

who lived then, as now, in those mud hovels, which are the astonishment

and reprobation of foreign tourists. There were 24,000 families who had

"one chimney," and 16,000 who had more than one. The average number

appears to be four. Dublin Castle had 125, and the Earl of Heath's

house, twenty-seven. There were, however, 164 houses in Dublin which had

more than ten.

Rearing and tending cattle was the principal employment of the people,

as, indeed, it always has been. There were, he estimates, 150,000

employed in this way, and 100,000 in agriculture. "Tailors and their

wives" are the next highest figure--45,000. Smiths and apprentices,

shoemakers and apprentices, are given at the same figure--22,500.

Millers and their wives only numbered 1,000, and the fishery trade the

same. The woolworkers and their wives, 30,000; but the number of

alehouse-keepers is almost incredible. In Dublin, where there were only

4,000 families, there was, at one time, 1,180 alehouses and ninety-one

public brewhouses. The proportion was equally great throughout the

country; and if we may judge from the Table of Exports from Belfast

before-mentioned, the manufacture was principally for home consumption,

as the returns only mention three barrels of beer to Scotland, 124 ditto

to the Colonies, 147 to France and Flanders, nineteen to Holland, and

forty-five to Spain and the Mediterranean. There are considerable

imports of brandy and wines, but no imports of beer. We find, however,

that "Chester ale" was appreciated by the faculty as a medicament, for

Sir Patrick Dun, who was physician to the army during the wars of 1688,

sent two dozen bottles of Chester ale, as part of his prescription, to

General Ginkles, Secretary-at-War, in the camp at Connaught, in 1691. He

added two dozen of the best claret, and at the same time sent a "lesser

box," in which there was a dozen and a-half potted chickens in an

earthen pot, and in another pot "foure green geese." "This," writes the

doctor, "is the physic I advise you to take; I hope it will not be

nauseous or disagreeable to your stomach-a little of it upon a

march."[529] It is to be supposed such prescriptions did not diminish

the doctor's fame, and that they were appreciated as they deserved.

A century previous (A.D. 1566), Thomas Smyth seems to have been the

principal, if not the only English practitioner in Dublin; and although

he sold his drugs with his advice, his business did not pay. However,

Thomas was "consoled" and "comforted," and "induced to remain in the

country," by the united persuasions of the Lord Deputy, the Counsellors

of State, and the whole army. The consolation was administered in the

form of a concordat, dated April 25th, 1566, by which an annual stipend

was settled on him, the whole army agreeing to give him one day's pay,

and every Counsellor of State twenty shillings, "by reason of his long

contynuance here, and his often and chardgeable provision of druggs and

other apothecarie wares, which have, from tyme to tyme, layen and

remained in manner for the most part unuttered; for the greater part of

this contray folke ar wonted to use the mynisterie of their leeches and

such lyke, and neglecting the apothecarie's science, the said Thomas

thereby hath been greatly hyndered, and in manner enforced to abandon

that his faculty."[530] It was only natural that the English settler

should distrust the _leeche_ who gathered his medicines on the hillside

by moonlight, "who invoked the fairies and consulted witches;" and it

was equally natural that the native should distrust the Saxon, who could

kill or cure with those magical little powders and pills, so

suspiciously small, so entirely unlike the traditionary medicants of the

country. In a list still preserved of the medicines supplied for the use

of Cromwell's army, we may judge of the "medicants" used in the

seventeenth century. They must have been very agreeable, for the

allowance of sugar, powder and loaf, of "candie," white and brown, of

sweet almonds and almond cakes, preponderates wonderfully over the

"rubarcke, sarsaparill, and aloes."[531] Mr. Richard Chatham was

Apothecary-General, and had his drugs duty free by an order, dated at

"ye new Customs' House, Dublin, ye 24th of June, 1659."

Dr. William Bedell was the first who suggested the foundation of a

College of Physicians. On the 15th of April, 1628, he wrote to Usher

thus: "I suppose it hath been an error all this while to neglect the

faculties of law and physic, and attend only to the ordering of one poor

college of divines." In 1637 a Regius Professor of Physic was nominated.

In 1654 Dr. John Stearne was appointed President of Trinity Hall, which

was at this time set apart "for the sole and proper use of physicians;"

and, in 1667, the physicians received their first charter from Charles

II. The new corporation obtained the title of "The President and College

of Physicians." It consisted of fourteen Fellows, including the

President, Dr. Stearne. Stearne was a grand-nephew of Archbishop Usher,

and was born in his house at Ardbraccan, county Meath. He was a man of

profound learning; and although he appears to have been more devoted to

scholastic studies than to physic, the medical profession in Ireland may

well claim him as an ornament and a benefactor to their faculty. The

College of Physicians was without a President from 1657 until 1690, when

Sir Patrick Dun was elected. The cause of this was the unfortunate

illiberality of the Provost and Fellows of Trinity College, who refused

to confirm the election of Dr. Crosby, simply because he was a Roman

Catholic. In 1692 the College received a new charter and more extended

privileges; and these, with certain Acts of Parliament, form its present

constitution.

In medieval cities the castle was the centre round which the town

extended itself. Dublin was no exception to this rule, and in this

century we find High-street and Castle-street the fashionable resorts.

The nobility came thither for society, the tradesmen for protection.

Castle-street appears to have been the favourite haunt of the

bookselling fraternity, and Eliphud Dobson (his name speaks for his

religious views) was the most wealthy bookseller and publisher of his

day. His house was called the Stationers' Arms, which flourished in the

reign of James II. The Commonwealth was arbitrary in its requirements,

and commanded that the printer (there was then only one) should submit

any works he printed to the Clerk of the Council, to receive his

_imprimatur_ before publishing the same. The Williamites were equally

tyrannical, for Malone was dismissed by them from the office of State

Printer, and tried in the Queen's Bench, with John Dowling, in 1707, for

publishing "A Manuall of Devout Prayers," for the use of Roman

Catholics.[532]

There were also a great number of taverns and coffee-houses in this

street; the most noted was the Rose Tavern, which stood nearly opposite

to the present Castle steps. Swift alludes to this in the verses which

he wrote on his own death, in 1731:--

"Suppose me dead; and then suppose

A club assembled at the _Rose."_

Political clubs, lawyers' clubs, and benevolent clubs, all assembled

here; and the Friendly Brothers of St. Patrick had their annual dinner

at the _Rose_, at the primitive hour of four o'clock, annually, on the

17th of March, having first transacted business and heard a sermon at

St. Patrick's.

The first Dublin newspaper was published in this century, by Robert

Thornton, bookseller, at the sign of the Leather Bottle, in

Skinner's-row, A.D. 1685. It consisted of a single leaf of small folio

size, printed on both sides, and written in the form of a letter, each

number being dated, and commencing with the word "sir." The fashionable

church was St. Michael's in High-street. It is described, in 1630, as

"in good reparacion; and although most of the parishioners were

recusants, it was commonly full of Protestants, who resorted thither

every Sunday to hear divine service and sermon." This church had been

erected originally for Catholic worship. Meanwhile the priests were

obliged to say Mass wherever they could best conceal themselves; and in

the reign of James I. their services were solemnized in certain back

rooms in the houses of Nicholas Quietrot, Carye, and the Widow O'Hagan,

in High-street.[533] Amongst the fashionables who lived in this locality

we find the Countess of Roscommon, Sir P. Wemys, Sir Thady Duff, and

Mark Quin, the Lord Mayor of Dublin in 1667. Here, too, was established

the first Dublin post-house, for which the nation appears to have been

indebted indirectly to Shane O'Neill, of whose proceedings her Majesty

Queen Elizabeth was anxious to be cognizant with as little delay as

possible. In 1656, it having been found that the horses of the military,

to whom postal communications had been confided previously, were "much

wearied, and his Highness' affayres much prejudiced for want of a

post-office to carry publique letters," Evan Vaughan was employed to

arrange postal communications, and was made Deputy Postmaster. Major

Swift was the Postmaster at Holyhead, and he was allowed £100 a-year for

the maintenance of four boatmen, added to the packet boats, at the rate

of _8d_. per diem and 18s. per month for wages. Post-houses were

established in the principal towns in Ireland about the year 1670, by

means of which, for 8_d_. or 12_d_., letters could be conveyed, twice a

week, to the "remotest parts of Ireland," and which afforded "the

conveniency of keeping good correspondence."

The Dublin Philosophical Society held their first meetings on Cork-hill,

at the close of this century, and it is evident that there were many men

in that age who had more than ordinary zeal for scientific research. Dr.

Mullen has left a detailed account of the difficulties under which he

dissected an elephant, which had been burned to death in the booth where

it was kept for exhibition on the 17th June, 1682. According to Haller,

oculists are indebted to him for some important discoveries connected

with the organs of vision.[534]

The old Custom-house stood on the site of houses now comprised in that

part of Dublin known as Wellington-quay. Here a locality was selected,

in the reign of James I., for the purpose of "erecting cranes and making

wharves." This street, now so busy and populous, was then in the

suburbs, and is described in the lease, A.D. 1620, as "a certain parcel

of ground, lying in or near Dame-street, street, in the suburbs of the

city of Dublin." A new Custom-house was erected about the period of the

Restoration, with the addition of a council-chamber, where the Privy

Council and Committees of the House of Commons were accustomed to

assemble. By an order of the Privy Council, 19th September, 1662, the

Custom-house-quay was appointed the sole place for landing and lading

the exports and imports of the city of Dublin. In 1683 the public

Exchange of Dublin was transferred from Cork House to the Tholsel, a

building erected early in the reign of Edward II., and described by

Camden as built of hewn stone. Here the Mayor was elected on Michaelmas

Day, and the citizens held their public meetings. A clock was set up in

1560, no doubt very much to the admiration of the citizens. A new

Tholsel or City Hall was erected in 1683, on the same site, and there

was a "'Change," where merchants met every day, as in the Royal Exchange

in London. Public dinners were given here also with great magnificence;

but from the marshy nature of the ground on which the building had been

set up, it fell to decay in 1797, and a new Sessions-house was erected

in Greenstreet.

Nor did the good people of Dublin neglect to provide for their

amusements. Private theatricals were performed in the Castle at the

latter end of the reign of Queen Elizabeth, if not earlier. The sum of

one-and-twenty shillings and two groats was expended on wax tapers for

the play of "Gorbodne," "done at the Castle," in September, 1601.

Miracle and mystery plays were enacted as early as 1528, when the Lord

Deputy was "invited to a new play every day in Christmas;" where the

Tailors acted the part of Adam and Eve, it is to be supposed because

they initiated the trade by introducing the necessity for garments; the

Shoemakers, the story of Crispin and Crispianus; the Vintners, Bacchus

and his story; the Carpenters, Mary and Joseph; the Smiths represented

Vulcan; and the Bakers played the comedy of Ceres, the goddess of corn.

The stage was erected on Hogges-green, now College-green; and probably

the entertainment was carried out _al fresco_. The first playhouse

established in Dublin was in Werburgh-street, in 1633. Shirley's plays

were performed here soon after, and also those of "rare Ben Jonson."

Ogilvy, Shirley's friend, and the promoter of this enterprise, was

appointed Master of the Revels in Ireland in 1661; and as his first

theatre was ruined during the civil war, he erected a "noble theatre,"

at a cost of £2,000, immediately after his new appointment, on a portion

of the Blind-quay. Dunton describes the theatres, in 1698, as more

frequented than the churches, and the actors as "no way inferior to

those in London." The Viceroys appear to have been very regular in their

patronage of this amusement; and on one occasion, when the news reached

Dublin of the marriage of William of Orange and Mary, the Duke of

Ormonde, after "meeting the nobility and gentry in great splendour at

the play, passed a general invitation to all the company to spend that

evening at the Castle."[535]

The inventory of the household effects of Lord Grey, taken in 1540,

affords us ample information on the subject of dress and household

effects. The list commences with "eight tun and a pype of Gaskoyne

wine," and the "long board in the hall." A great advance had been made

since we described the social life of the eleventh century; and the

refinements practised at meals was not the least of many improvements. A

_bord-clothe_ was spread on the table, though forks were not used until

the reign of James I. They came from Italy, to which country we owe many

of the new fashions introduced in the seventeenth century. In _The Boke

of Curtosye_ there are directions given not to "foule the _bord-clothe_

wyth the knyfe;" and Ben Jonson, in his comedy of "The Devil is an Ass,"

alludes to the introduction of forks, and the consequent disuse of

napkins:

"The laudable use of forks,

Brought into custom here as they are in Italy,

To th' sparing o' napkins."

The English edition of the _Janua Linguarum_ of Comenius, represents the

fashion of dining in England during the Commonwealth. The table was

simply a board placed on a frame or trestles, which was removed after

the meal to leave room for the dancers. Old Capulet's hall was prepared

thus:

"A hall! a hall! give room, and foot it, girls!

More light, ye knaves, and turn the table up."

The head of the table, where the principal person sat, was called the

"board-end;" and as one long table was now used instead of several

smaller ones, the guests of higher and lower degree were divided by the

massive saltcellar, placed in the centre of the table. Thus, in Ben

Jonson, it is said of a man who treats his inferiors with scorn, "He

never drinks below the salt." The waiters, after settling the cloth,

placed the spoons, knives, forks, bread, and napkins beside the

trenchers. The butler served out the drink from the cupboard, the origin

of our modern sideboard. The "cobbord," erroneously supposed to have

been like our modern cupboard, is specially mentioned amongst Lord

Grey's effects. Lord Fairfax, in his directions to his servants, written

about the middle of the seventeenth century, says: "No man must fill

beer or wine the cupboard keeper," and he should know which of his "cups

for beer and which for wine, for it were a foul thing to mix them

together." There was another reason, however, for this arrangement--much

"idle tippling" was cut off thereby; for as the draught of beer or wine

had to be asked for when it was needed, demand was not likely to be so

quick as if it were always at hand. There were also cups of "assaye,"

from which the cupbearer was obliged to drink before his master, to

prove that there was no poison in the liquor which he used. The cupboard

was covered with a carpet, of which Lord Grey had two. These carpets, or

tablecovers, were more or less costly, according to the rank and state

of the owner. His Lordship had also "two chares, two fformes, and two

stooles." Chairs were decidedly a luxury at that day. Although the name

is of Anglo-Norman origin, they did not come into general use until a

late period; and it was considered a mark of disrespect to superiors,

for young persons to sit in their presence on anything but hard benches

or stools. The Anglo-Saxons called their seats _sett_ and _stol_, a name

which we still preserve in the modern stool. The hall was ornamented

with rich hangings, and there was generally a _traves_, which could be

used as a curtain or screen to form a temporary partition. The floor was

strewn with rushes, which were not removed quite so frequently as would

have been desirable, considering that they were made the repository of

the refuse of the table. Perfumes were consequently much used, and we

are not surprised to find "a casting bottel, dooble gilte, for

rose-water," in the effects of a Viceroy of the sixteenth century. Such

things were more matters of necessity than of luxury at even a later

period. Meat and pudding were the staple diet of the upper classes in

1698. Wright[536] gives a long and amusing extract from a work published

by a foreigner who had been much in England at this period, and who

appears to have marvelled equally at the amount of solid meat consumed,

the love of pudding, and the neglect of fruit at dessert.

We are able, fortunately, to give a description of the fare used during

the same period in Ireland, at least by the upper classes, who could

afford to procure it. Captain Bodley, a younger brother of the founder

of the famous Bodleian Library in Oxford, has left an account of a

journey into Lecale, in Ulster, in 1603, and of the proceedings of his

companions-in-arms, and the entertainment they met with. His "tour" is

full of that gossiping, chatty, general information, which gives an

admirable idea of the state of society. This is his description of a

dinner: "There was a large and beautiful collar of brawn, with its

accompaniments, to wit, mustard and Muscatel wine; there were

well-stuffed geese (such as the Lord Bishop is wont to eat at

Ardbraccan), the legs of which Captain Caulfield always laid hold of for

himself; there were pies of venison and various kinds of game; pasties

also, some of marrow, with innumerable plums; others of it with

coagulated milk, such as the Lord Mayor and Aldermen of London almost

always have at their feasts; others, which they call tarts, of divers

shapes, materials, and colours, made of beef, mutton, and veal." Then he

relates the amusements. After dinner they rode, and in the evening they

played cards, and had, "amongst other things, that Indian tobacco of

which I shall never be able to make sufficient mention." Later in the

evening "maskers" came to entertain them; and on one occasion, their

host gave them up his own "good and soft bed, and threw himself upon a

pallet in the same chamber."[537]

The large stand-bed, or four-post, was then coming into use, and was,

probably, the "good and soft bed" which the host resigned to the use of

the officers, and which, if we may judge by the illustration of this

piece of furniture, would conveniently hold a considerable number of

persons. The pallet was placed on the truckle-bed, which rolled under

the large bed, and was generally used by a servant, who slept in his

master's room. The reader will remember the speech of Mine Host of the

Garter, in the "Merry Wives of Windsor," who says of Falstaff's room:

"There's his chamber, his house, his castle, his standing-bed and

truckle-bed."

However interesting the subject may be, there is not space to go into

further details. The inventory of Lord Grey's personal effects can

scarcely be given as a picture of costume in this century, for even a

few years produced as considerable changes in fashion then as now.

Dekker, in his _Seven Deadly Sinnes of London_, describes an

Englishman's suit as being like a traitor's body that had been hanged,

drawn, and quartered, and set up in several places; and says: "We that

mock every nation for keeping one fashion, yet steal patches from every

one of them to piece out our pride, and are now laughing-stocks to them.

The block for his head alters faster than the feltmaker can fit him, and

hereupon we are called in scorn block-heads." The courtiers of Charles

II. compensated themselves for the stern restraints of Puritanism, by

giving way to the wildest excesses in dress and manners. Enormous

periwigs were introduced, and it became the fashion for a man of _ton_

to be seen combing them on the Mall or at the theatre. The hat was worn

with a broad brim, ornamented with feathers; a falling band of the

richest lace adorned the neck; the short cloak was edged deeply with

gold lace; the doublet was ornamented in a similar manner--it was long,

and swelled out from the waist; but the "petticoat breeches" were the

glory of the outer man, and sums of money were spent on ribbon and lace

to add to their attractions.

The ladies' costume was more simple, at least at this period; they

compensated themselves, however, for any plainness in dress, by

additional extravagances in their head-dresses, and wore

"heart-breakers," or artificial curls, which were set out on wires at

the sides of the face. Patching and painting soon became common, and

many a nonconformist divine lifted up his voice in vain against these

vanities. Pepys has left ample details of the dress in this century;

and, if we may judge from the entry under the 30th of October, 1663,

either he was very liberal in his own expenditure, and very parsimonious

towards his wife, or ladies' attire was much less costly than

gentlemen's, for he murmurs over his outlay of about £12 for Mrs. Pepys

and £55 for himself. The country people, however, were attired more

plainly and less expensively, while many, probably--

"Shook their heads at folks in London,"

and wondered at the follies of their superiors.

The arms and military accoutrements of the period have already been

mentioned incidentally, and are illustrated by the different costumes in

our engravings, which Mr. Doyle has rendered with the minutest accuracy

of detail. This subject, if treated at all, would require space which we

cannot afford to give it. The Life Guards were embodied by Charles II,

in 1681, in imitation of the French "Gardes des Corps." The Coldstream

were embodied by General Monk, in 1660, at the town from whence they

obtained their name.

From an account in the Hamilton MSS., published in the _Ulster_

_Archæological Journal_, it would appear that it was usual, or, at least

not uncommon, for young men of rank to go abroad for some time, attended

by a tutor, to perfect themselves in continental languages. It need

scarcely be said that travelling was equally tedious and expensive. A

journey from Dublin to Cork occupied several days; postchaises are a

comparatively modern invention; and Sir William Petty astonished the

good people of Dublin, in the seventeenth century, by inventing some

kind of carriage which could be drawn by horses. With his description of

the condition of the lower classes in Ireland at this period, I shall

conclude this chapter. The accompanying figure represents the costume of

the Irish peasant about the fifteenth century. The dress was found on

the body of a male skeleton, in the year 1824, which was preserved so

perfectly, that a coroner was called to hold an inquest on it. The

remains were taken from a bog in the parish of Killery, co. Sligo. The

cloak was composed of soft brown cloth; the coat of the same material,

but of finer texture. The buttons are ingeniously formed of the cloth.

The trowsers consists of two distinct parts, of different colours and

textures; the upper part is thick, coarse, yellowish-brown cloth; the

lower, a brown and yellow plaid.

[Illustration]

"The diet of these people is milk, sweet and sour, thick and thin; but

tobacco, taken in short pipes seldom burned, seems the pleasure of their

lives. Their food is bread in cakes, whereof a penny serves a week for

each; potatoes from August till May; muscles, cockles, and oysters, near

the sea; eggs and butter, made very rancid by keeping in bogs. As for

flesh they seldom eat it. Their fuel is turf in most places." The

potatoe, which has brought so many national calamities on the country,

had been then some years in the country, but its use was not yet as

general as it has become since, as we find from the mention of "bread in

cakes" being an edible during a considerable part of the year.

[Illustration: CASTLE CAULFIELD, COUNTY TYRONE.]

[Illustration: SCENE OF THE BATTLE OF THE BOYNE.]

FOOTNOTES:

[512] _Language_--A proclamation in Irish, issued by Tyrone in 1601, is

still extant, with a contemporary English translation.--_See Ulster

Arch. Jour_. vol. vi. p. 57.

[513] _Pope_.--He rhymes spirit and merit; fit and yet; civil and devil;

obey and tea.

[514] _Tasso_.--

"The land fornenst the Greekish shore he held."

Chaucer, too, uses _faute_ for _fault_ in the _Canterbury Tales_.

[515] _Historians_.--Max Müller--_Lectures on the Science of Language_,

p. 271--states, that labourers in country parishes in England do not use

more than 300 words. A friend of mine, who is an excellent Irish

scholar, assures me the most illiterate Irish-speaking peasant would use

at least 500.

[516] _Carew_.--The tradition of the country says that this vengeance

was excited by the complaints of a lady, with whom the Lord President

had some gallantries, and whose conduct Keating had reproved publicly.

[517] _Scholars_.--We have been favoured with an accurate photograph of

this inscription, by William Williams, Esq., of Dungarvan, from which

the engraving given above has been made. The view of Tubrid Churchyard

is also engraved from a sketch with which he has favoured us. It is

hoped that many Irishmen in distant lands will look with no little

interest on these beautifully executed engravings, and breathe a

blessing on the memory of the good and gifted priest. A Keating Society

was established a few years ago, principally through the exertions of

Mr. Williams and the Rev. P. Meany, C.C. A Catechism in Irish has

already appeared, and other works will follow in due time.

[518] _Brought us_.--Regal Visitation Book. A.D. 1622, MS., Marsh's

Library, Dublin.

[519] _Excluded_.--_History of England_, People's Edition, part ii. p.

156.

[520] _Desired_.--See the Hamilton Manuscripts, _Ulster Arch. Jour_.

vol. iii. pp. 155-147. Blair complains also that his patron "would

receive the sacrament kneeling."

[521] _England_.--"The diet, housing, and clothing of the 16,000

families above-mentioned [those were the middle class] is much the same

as in England; nor is the French elegance unknown in many of them, nor

the French and Latin tongues. The latter whereof is very frequent among

the poorest Irish, and chiefly in Kerry, most remote from

Dublin."--_Political Anatomy of Ireland_, Petty, p. 58.

[522] _Antwerp_.--_Descrittione dei Paesi Bassi:_ Anvers, 1567.

[523] _Paid_.--_The Sovereignly of the British Seas:_ London, 1651.

[524] _Little_.--_Hib. Pac_.

[525] _Head_.--The tract entitled _Killing no Murder_, which had

disturbed Cromwell's "peace and rest," and obliged him to live almost as

a fugitive in the country over which he had hoped to reign as a

sovereign, still left its impression on English society. The miserable

example of a royal execution was a precedent which no amount of

provocation should have permitted.

[526] _Writer_.--_Merchant's Map of Commerce:_ London, 1677.

[527] _Sex_.--_The Interest of Ireland in its Trade and Wealth_, by

Colonel Lawrence: Dublin, 1682.

[528] _Tobacco_.--A Table of the Belfast Exports and Imports for the

year 1683, has been published in the _Ulster Arch. Jour._ vol. iii. p.

194, which fully bears out this statement, and is of immense value in

determining the general state of Irish commerce at this period. There

are, however, some mistakes in the quotations of statistics, probably

misprints.

[529] _March_.--Gilbert's _Dublin_, vol. i. p. 178.

[530] _Faculty._--Document in the State Paper Office, Dublin, entitled

_Smyth's Information for Ireland._

[531] _Aloes._--_Ulster Arch. Jour._ vol. iii. p. 163.

[532] _Roman Catholics_.--The noisy and violent opposition which was

made to a Catholic if he attempted to enter either a trade or a

profession, would scarcely be credited at the present day; yet it should

be known and remembered by those who wish to estimate the social state

of this country accurately and fairly. After the Revolution, the

Protestant portion of the Guild of Tailors petitioned William III. to

make their corporation exclusively Protestant, and their request was

granted.

[533] _High-street_.--Gilbert's _Dublin_, vol. i. p. 220.

[534] _Vision_.--Gilbert's _Dublin_, vol. ii. p. 149.

[535] _Castle_.--Gilbert's _Dublin_, vol. ii. p. 69. There is a curious

account in the _Quarterly Journal of the Kilkenny Archæological

Society_, July, 1862, p. 165, of a comic playbill, issued for a Kilkenny

theatre, in May, 1793. The value of the tickets was to be taken, if

required, in candles, bacon, soap, butter, and cheese, and no one was to

be admitted into the boxes without shoes and stockings; which leads one

to conclude that the form of admission and style of attire were not

uncommon, or there would have been no joke in the announcement.

[536] _Wright.--Domestic Manners_, pp. 465, 466: "Oh! what an excellent

thing is an English pudding! Make a pudding for an Englishman, and you

will regale him, be he where he will."

[537] _Chamber_.--This most interesting and amusing journal is published

in the _Ulster Arch. Jour_. vol. iii. p. 73, with a translation and

notes. The original is in Latin.

An Illustrated History of Ireland from AD 400 to 1800 · 第 32 / 37 章