EXERCISES IN FALSE SYNTAX.

NOTE 1, TO RULE 12. A noun in the possessive case, should always be

distinguished by the apostrophe, or mark of elision; as, The _nation's_

glory.

That girls book is cleaner than those boys books.

Not correct, because the nouns _girls_ and _boys_ are both in the

possessive case, and, therefore, require the apostrophe, by which they

should be distinguished; thus, "_girl's, boys'"_ according to the

preceding NOTE. [Repeat the note.]

Thy ancestors virtue is not thine.

If the writer of this sentence meant _one_ ancestor, he should have

inserted the apostrophe after _r_, thus, "_ancestor's"_; if more than

one, after _s_, thus, _"ancestors'_ virtue;" but, by neglecting to place

the apostrophe, he has left his meaning ambiguous, and we cannot

ascertain it. This, and a thousand other mistakes you will often meet

with, demonstrate the truth of my declaration, namely, that "without the

knowledge and application of grammar rules, you will often speak and

write in such a manner as not to be _understood."_ You may now turn back

and re-examine the "illustration" of Rules 3, 4, and 12, on page 52, and

then correct the following examples about _five_ times over.

A mothers tenderness and a fathers care, are natures gift's for mans

advantage. Wisdoms precept's form the good mans interest and happiness.

They suffer for conscience's sake. He is reading Cowpers poems. James

bought Johnsons Dictionary.

RULE 4. A verb must agree with its nominative in number and person.

Those boys improves rapidly. The men labors in the field. Nothing

delight some persons. Thou shuns the light. He dare not do it. They

reads well.

I know you can correct these sentences without a rule, for they all have

a harsh sound, which offends the ear. I wish you, however, to adopt the

habit of correcting errors by applying rules; for, by-and-by, you will

meet with errors in composition which you cannot correct, if you are

ignorant of the application of grammar rules.

Now let us clearly understand this 4th Rule. Recollect, it applies to

the _verb_ and not to the noun; therefore, in these examples the verb is

ungrammatical. The noun _boys_, in the first sentence, is of the third

person _plural_, and the verb _improves_ is of the third person

_singular_; therefore, Rule 4th is violated, because the verb dues not

agree with its nominative in _number_. It should be, "boys _improve_."

The verb would then be _plural_, and agree with its nominative according

to the Rule. In the fourth sentence, the verb does not agree in _person_

with its nominative. _Thou_ is of the _second_ person, and _shuns_ is of

the _third_. It should be, "thou _shunnest_," &c. You may correct the

other sentences, and, likewise, the following exercises in

English Grammar in Familiar Lectures Accompanied by a compendium, embracing a new systematic order of parsing, a new system of punctuation, exercises in false syntax, and a system of philosophical grammar, in notes, to which are added an appendix and a key to the exercises : designed for the use of schools and private learners · 第 74 / 369 题