CHAPTER XLV.

ON THE ASH, BEECH, AND OTHER WHITE-WOODED TREES.

THE ASH (_Fraxinus excelsior_), when well-grown and in good

foliage, is one of our most charming trees; its light, graceful, and

agreeably-coloured leaves, united with a graceful disposition of lithe,

smoothly-formed limbs, altogether fully entitle it to be considered as

the “Venus of the Forest.”

The leaves of the common ash are pinnate, with from three to four pairs

of leaflets and one terminal leaflet. This latter is sometimes absent

when the apex is bifoliate, and a form called the double-leaf is

produced, which even at this day is reputed by the rustics to be capable

of working various charms.

It is this pinnate pendent leaf which, loosely hanging on the flexile,

more or less pendent branches, gives so much grace to the tree.

We have been much pleased with some groups of ash trees in Earl

Bathurst’s park (Oakley Park) at Cirencester; but, as Strutt well

observes,—

It is in mountain scenery that the ash appears to peculiar

advantage; waving its slender branches over some precipice which

just affords it soil sufficient for its footing, or springing

between crevices of rock, a happy emblem of the hardy spirit which

will not be subdued by fortune’s scantiness. It is likewise a

lovely object by the side of some crystal stream, in which it views

its elegant pendent foliage, bending, Narcissus-like, over its own

charms.

But charming as is the ash when in its most perfect foliage, yet as its

æstivation is usually so late, and the fall of its leaves so early and

rapid, it often displays all but naked limbs, even amidst the freshness

of spring, as well as during the autumnal tinting of almost all other

trees. It would seem that its buds cannot expand in spring frosts,

whilst the first frost of autumn will frequently make the whole foliage

drop in one mass beneath the influence of the succeeding sunshine. This

susceptibility to spring cold is doubtless at the base of the country

weather predictions which are made to depend upon the behaviour of the

ash in respect to its time of displaying its leaves:—

When the oak’s before the ash,

You may then expect a dash.

Generally held to mean, that if the leaves of the oak are seen before

those of the ash, a fine dry summer may be expected; but, on the

contrary,—

With the ash before the oak,

You may then expect a soak.

The truth of all this may be that a cold wet spring, which would retard

the bursting of the buds of the ash, may be expected to be followed by a

fine summer; whilst, on the contrary, a genial forward spring is often

succeeded by a wet summer.

Selby remarks on the early fall of the leaf, which, as he says, is

“after the first autumnal frost, however early that may happen; and

this, in general, without undergoing any change of colour, or

contributing by the ’sear and yellow leaf’ to the waning beauty of

autumnal foliage.” On this account, Sir T. D. Lauder recommends that

“ash trees should be sparingly planted around a gentleman’s residence,

to avoid the risk of their giving to it a cold, late appearance, at a

season when all nature should smile.”

It should be noted that although the ash seems to be so susceptible of

cold, it nevertheless ripens its seeds most perfectly in any part of

Great Britain; and besides this, these seeds, or “keys,” when naturally

sown, come up with the greatest certainty, so that young ash may be

removed from the wood and used for planting.

This renders it easy to cultivate young plants from seed; to which end,

when the ripened keys are gathered in the autumn, they should be well

examined to see that the seed has not been eaten out by the ash-weevil,

as it will most certainly be if a small orifice be observable on one

side of the key or samara, just over the seed.

In growing ash with a view to profit, it is recommended to plant it by

itself in belts or plantations, which are called ash-holts, as it

usually, when well started, grows upwards too fast to be a good nurse to

other trees, which latter would suffer from the whipping of the longer

heavy flexile stems of the ash.[29]

[29] Selby says, “The pitting system should always be adopted in

planting the ash, for the roots, even in young plants, are too numerous,

large, and spreading, to be properly inserted by the splitting or [T]

method.” We would also add, that they should be planted as soon upon

removal as possible.

It is too often planted in hedge-rows, where it is exceedingly

objectionable, not only from the ill effects on the scene of

interminable rows of one kind of tree, but the drip and the peculiar

growth of the roots render it most destructive to the growth of crops

planted beneath its shade.

The uses to which the wood of this tree is turned are multifarious in

the extreme. Walking-sticks are made from ash saplings; and as, from

youth to age, it is so tough and elastic, it is used for handles and

other parts of farm implements and machinery of all kinds. The

wheelwright and coachmaker employ the wood extensively; so also the

cooper. As a firewood its “offal” is always welcome, as it burns with a

clear, bright flame, and that nearly as well in the green as in the dry

state; and the whole tree is so rich in potash that this alkali is often

made from its trimmings and loppings.

We had already mentioned some of the superstitions connected with the

ash, and at p. 250 will be found directions for making a shrew-ash; we

shall now, therefore, only direct attention to another practice which

this tree was employed for, even to a somewhat recent period, as it will

account for some curious growths of ash which will sometimes be met

with. Evelyn says:—

I have heard it affirmed with great confidence, and upon

experience, that the rupture to which many children are obnoxious,

is healed, by passing the infant through a wide cleft made in the

bole or stem of the growing ash-tree; it is then carried a second

time round the ash, and caused to repass the same aperture as

before. The rupture of the child being bound up, it is supposed to

heal as the cleft of the tree closes and coalesces.

As, then, the healing of the child would seem to depend upon that of

the tree, this potent charm is not always successful, as may be gathered

from the fact that young trees have been met with which never healed at

all, and we recollect one of these, of which the accompanying wood-cut

is a copy, having been presented at a Conversazione of the

Worcestershire Natural History Society. The tree from whence it was

taken was of about ten years of age. Selby says that an instance of this

use of the ash is “related by the Rev. T. Bree, in the _Magazine of

Natural History_, where a ruptured child was made to pass through the

chasm of a young ash-tree, split for the purpose, in Warwickshire.”

[Illustration]

These facts seem to point to the acting upon such superstitions to

within a comparatively recent period, though doubtless the drawing a

child beneath the stolon or shoot of a bramble that has rooted at its

extremity, and which we have known to be gravely recommended by a wise

(!) woman, would be equally efficacious, and, upon the whole, easier to

perform.

Evelyn further says that “the chemists exceedingly commend the seed of

the ash to be an admirable remedy for the stone.” “But,” he adds,

“whether by the power of magic or nature, I determine not.” We would

suggest that it was by the power its roots possess of riving the natural

rock. So stone-crop, from decomposing the stones on which it grows, was

held to have the like effect. How strange, then, it is that with such

evidences of the truth of the motto,—

Similia similibus curantur,

physicians of the present day should refuse to listen to this still (and

very small) voice of nature, and not all become homœopaths! Such may

well be the reasoning of many an old woman who still pretends to cures

either by magic spells or infinitesimal globules.

Two interesting varieties of ash are met with: the pendulous or

weeping-ash, which, Sir W. Hooker informs us, is said to have been first

discovered in a field at Gamlingay, and the _Fraxinus heterophylla_, in

which the leaf is simple, that is, it is in one piece, more the form of

a laurel-leaf than the usual pinnated ash-leaf. These variations are

easily perpetuated by grafting, and are here only mentioned on account

of their peculiar habits.

* * * * *

THE BEECH (_Fagus sylvatica_) is admitted by all authors to be a native

of Great Britain, and if the many magnificent giants one here and there

meets with be admitted as proofs of indigenous origin, few trees can put

in a more imposing claim. The celebrated Burnham beeches, so well known

to artists and lovers of nature in general, and the many fine examples

of this tree in the Cotteswolds, upon which range it is said to grow as

a weed, testify to the age and size to which the beech may attain.

The plantations of beeches in Oakley Park are well worthy of note in

speaking of the Cotteswolds, for although they have been planted here,

yet the fine, tall, clean balks, lofty tops, and the “twilight shades”

beneath, will not soon be forgotten by the author, who, beneath their

boughs, through the liberality of Earl Bathurst, “has felt them all his

own,” as says the poet Gray of the Burnham beeches. Here, too, has he

mused, though not, like Pope, in “thoughts that burn,” yet much

wondering at the curious plants which choose such seclusion for their

dwelling. Of these the following may be here enumerated, as they really

form part of the natural history of the beech wood:—

_Listera Nidus-avis_—Birds’-nest Orchis.

_Habenaria chlorantha_—Butterfly Orchis.

_Epipactis grandiflora_—Large White Helleborine.

_Epipactis ensifolia_—Narrow-leaved White Helleborine.

_Epipactis latifolia_—Broad-leaved Helleborine.

_Monotropa Hypopithys_—Yellow Birds’-nest.

_Pyrola minor_—Lesser Winter Green.

Such a list of plants found in the beech woods is sufficient to make

their locality remarkable, and if we add to them the

_Tuber cibarium_—Truffle,

_Morchella esculenta_—Morell,

_Elaphomyces muricatus_—Sharp-warted _Elaphomyces_,

—these, with various other curious fungi, will be sufficient to make

Oakley Park and its beeches a botanical habitat of no mean pretension.

As regards the truffle, we may mention that we have heard that a former

Earl Bathurst kept dogs for the purpose of hunting them. We have

partaken of the morells from this park several times, and always found

them delicious, and can recommend them stuffed with sausage-meat and

fried, as a dish for an epicure: we have seen them exposed for sale in

the greengrocers’ shops of the good old town of Cirencester.

But we are sadly digressing from the subject of the beech tree in his

history as a forest and ornamental tree. Under the latter aspect, then,

most authors, except Gilpin, view the beech to hold a very high place.

Coleman, in his “Woodlands,” considers that,—

Among our truly indigenous forest-trees, the beech must certainly

rank as second only to the oak for majesty and picturesqueness;

while, for the union of grace and nobility, it may claim precedence

over every other member of our sylva.

Having said this, we must, as a matter of course, dissent from the

opinion of Gilpin, the highly-gifted author of “Forest Scenery,”

who has, as we think, unjustly impugned the ornamental character of

this generally favourite tree, and this because he had some

crotchets of his own about landscape composition, and the shape

that trees ought to take to make them good subjects for the pencil.

The beech did not happen to fit itself to his theory, and so he

quarrelled with it, and called it hard names.

Any one who has ever seen a well-grown beech tree, such as was once our

delight to visit at Hartley Bottom, near the source of the Thames, or

who has seen such masses of beech glowing with autumnal tints as may be

witnessed in a journey on the Great Western Railway between Swindon and

Cheltenham, will never speak disparagingly of the beech, which we think

noble, alike by itself as in masses, or as a sylvan denizen with other

trees.

But it has other claims besides that of ornament; it is a highly useful

wood, much employed in carpentry, cabinet-work, and turnery; in the

making of charcoal; and increasingly so in the manufacture of

wood-spirit.

As a firewood it excels most others, as it burns with a clear flame,

even when wet, and leaves behind only a small quantity of ash. How,

indeed, could it possess much ash when it flourishes in positions where

scarcely four inches of soil covers up the oolitic stone, its roots

spreading over the rock and occasionally dipping into its fissures in a

manner most aptly illustrative of the fact that this tree really derives

but little nutrition from the soil, the rocks upon which it grows, for

the most part, serving to moor the giant in position that it may spread

forth its leaves to feed upon the atmosphere?

The beech is easily propagated from its fruit—“mast”—which, indeed, so

readily grows beneath the trees that thousands might be obtained for the

purpose of pricking out in nursery lines, if looked after. The usual

method of cultivation is to gather the mast in the autumn, to keep it

well in sand, and sow in the spring. After two years it is pricked out

in nursery rows, and is fit for planting in three years more.

Where once established it will soon spread, as the mast grows

sporadically with great readiness, and this tree has a faculty for

extending undisputed possession; thus, in America will be found

wide-extended forests of scarcely anything but beech, which, though

perhaps a little varied from our own, is yet doubtless of the same

species.

There are several ornamental varieties of beech to be obtained from the

nurserymen, some of which are more curious than useful; but we must not

omit to mention the Copper Beech (_Fagus sylvatica_, var. _purpurea_).

This, judiciously disposed, is capable of affording a great charm to the

wood, and more especially in plantations near the homestead. They are

fast-growing trees, and at present are here and there to be met with of

considerable size. We once possessed a couple on our lawn, the largest

of which must have been nearly six feet in circumference; and what from

its colour, the thickness of its foliage, and the fine sweep of its

branches, it was capable of yielding shade and shelter of a most perfect

and agreeable kind.

The drip of the beech is prejudicial to cultivation, we think, from the

circumstance that the hard, though thin, leaves are so difficult of

decomposition that where they fall they leave a thick carpet covering up

the ground. If, then, these trees are in such a position as to do

mischief from this cause, the leaves should be removed, and they will,

if stored, be found very useful in making hotbeds, linings to pots, and

other gardening work.

Beech is less liable to insect attacks than almost any other tree; the

most annoying is that of the _Aphis_, especially when near the house, as

this harbours insects of all kinds, and the exuding honey-dew much

injures the aspect of the tree.

Beech timber would be more valuable than it is were it not for its

liability, when in panels, tables, and furniture, to be attacked and

bored by weevils. We once had our house so infested with these little

beetles, derived from some furniture of this wood, as to cause

considerable alarm; but fortunately our domestic’s knowledge of natural

history in the matter of bugs was somewhat defective, as she had

mistaken the nature of the weevil. This pest can be removed by boiling

in oil; but it is a great drawback to the use of a wood which otherwise

might be applied to various domestic purposes.

Science and Practice in Farm Cultivation · 第 45 / 51 章