THE CONSTITUTION OF 1844

The Constitution of 1844 as submitted by the Convention to Congress

and to the people of the Territory of Iowa contained thirteen

articles, one hundred and eight sections, and over six thousand words.

Article I. on "Preamble and Boundaries" acknowledges dependence upon

"the Supreme Ruler of the Universe" and purports to "establish a free

and independent government" in order "to establish justice, ensure

tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general

welfare, secure to ourselves and our posterity, the rights of life,

liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

Article II. as the "Bill of Rights" declares that "all men are by

nature free and independent, and have certain unalienable rights,

among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty,

acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and

obtaining safety and happiness." All political power is "inherent in

the people;" for their "protection, security, and benefit" government

is instituted; and they, the people, have "the right at all times, to

alter, or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it."

Following these classic political dogmas of the American Revolution is

a rather exhaustive enumeration of the fundamental rights of the

individual, which at various times and in various ways had found

expression in the state papers and Constitutions of England and

America, and which together constitute the domain of Anglo-Saxon

liberty and freedom.

Article III. defines the "Right of Suffrage" by limiting the exercise

thereof to white male citizens of the United States, of the age of

twenty-one years, who shall have been residents of the State six

months next preceding the election, and of the county in which they

claim a vote thirty days.

Article IV. proclaims the theory of the separation of powers in

sweeping terms, and prescribes the constitution of the law-making

department. Herein the legislative authority was vested in a General

Assembly, which was organized on the bicameral plan. The members of

the House of Representatives were to be chosen for two years,

those of the Senate for four years. The regular sessions of the

General Assembly were to be held biennially.

Article V. on the "Executive Department" provides that the "Supreme

Executive power shall be vested in a Governor, who shall hold his

office for two years; and that a Lieutenant Governor shall be chosen

at the same time and for the same term." The Governor must be a

citizen of the United States and have attained the age of thirty

years.

Article VI. organizes the "Judicial Department." It provides for a

Supreme Court consisting of "a Chief Justice and two Associates," to

be chosen by the General Assembly for a term of four years. The

District Court was to "consist of a Judge, who shall reside in

the district assigned him by law," and be elected by the people for

the same term as the Judges of the Supreme Court.

Article VII. provides that the "Militia" shall be composed of "all

able bodied white male persons between the ages of eighteen and

forty-five years," except such persons as are or may be especially

exempted by law. All details relative to organizing, equipping, and

disciplining the militia were left to the General Assembly.

Article VIII. on "Public Debts and Liabilities" prohibited the General

Assembly from contracting debts and obligations which in the aggregate

would exceed one hundred thousand dollars.

Article IX. placed restrictions upon banking and other business

corporations.

Article X. deals with "Education and School Lands." It provides for a

"Superintendent of Public Instruction" who shall be chosen by the

General Assembly. It directs the General Assembly to provide for a

system of common schools. It declares also that the General Assembly

"shall encourage, by all suitable means, the promotion of

intellectual, scientific, moral and agricultural improvement."

Article XI. outlines a system of local government which includes both

the county and the township organization. The details are left to the

General Assembly.

Article XII. provides for "Amendments to the Constitution." In the

case of partial revision of the Constitution, the specific amendment

must be passed by two successive General Assemblies and ratified by

the people. When it is desired to have a total revision of the

fundamental law, the General Assembly submits the question of a

Constitutional Convention to a direct vote of the people.

Article XIII. provides a "Schedule" for the transition from the

Territorial to the State organization.

From the view-point of subsequent events the most significant

provision of the Constitution of 1844 was the one which defined the

boundaries of the future State. There is, however, no evidence that

the members of the Convention foresaw the probability of a dispute

with Congress on this point, although Governor Chambers in his message

of December, 1843, had pointed out its possibility should the people

of Iowa assume to give boundaries to the State without first

making application to Congress for definite limits. It was on the

question of boundaries that the Constitution of 1844 was wrecked.

In the Convention the regular standing Committee on State Boundaries

reported in favor of certain lines which were in substance the

boundaries recommended by Governor Lucas in his message of November,

1839. Indeed, it is altogether probable that the recommendations of

Robert Lucas were made the basis of the Committee's report. This

inference is strengthened by the fact that the illustrious Ex-Governor

was a member of the Committee. It will be convenient to refer to the

boundaries recommended by the Committee as the _Lucas boundaries_.

The Lucas boundaries were based upon the topography of the country as

determined by rivers. On the East was the great Mississippi, on the

West the Missouri, and on the North the St. Peters. These natural

boundaries were to be connected and made continuous by the artificial

lines of the surveyor. As to the proposed Eastern boundary there could

be no difference of opinion; and it was generally felt that the

Missouri river should determine the Western limit.

On the South the boundary must necessarily be the Northern line of the

State of Missouri. But the exact location of this line had not been

authoritatively determined. During the administration of Lucas it was

the subject of a heated controversy between Missouri and Iowa which at

one time bordered on armed hostility. The purpose of the

Convention in 1844 was not to settle the dispute but to refer to the

line in a way which would neither prejudice nor compromise the claims

of Iowa.

The discussion of the Northern boundary was, in the light of

subsequent events, more significant. As proposed by the Committee the

line was perhaps a little vague and indefinite since the exact

location of certain rivers named was not positively known. Some

thought that the boundary proposed would make the State too large.

Others thought that it would make the State too small. Mr. Hall

proposed the parallel of forty-two and one-half degrees of North

latitude. Mr. Peck suggested the parallel of forty-four. Mr.

Langworthy, of Dubuque, asked that forty-five degrees be made

the Northern limit.

Mr. Langworthy's proposition met with considerable favor among the

people living in the Northern part of the Territory who desired to

increase the size of the State by including a considerable tract North

of the St. Peters. Mr. Chapman suggests the existence of sectional

feeling in the matter of boundaries when he says, in reply to Mr.

Langworthy's argument, that "it was a kind of creeping up on the North

which was not good faith to the South."

On October 14 the report of the regular Committee on State Boundaries

was referred to a Select Committee consisting of representatives from

the twelve electoral districts. But this Committee made no changes in

the original report except to make the Northern boundary a

little more definite.

As finally adopted by the Convention and incorporated into the

Constitution of 1844, the boundaries of the State were as follows:

"Beginning in the middle of the main channel of the Mississippi river

opposite the mouth of the Des Moines river; thence up the said river

Des Moines, in the middle of the main channel thereof, to a point

where it is intersected by the Old Indian Boundary line, or line run

by John C. Sullivan in the year 1816; thence westwardly along said

line to the 'Old Northwest corner of Missouri;' thence due west to the

middle of the main channel of the Missouri river; thence up in the

middle of the main channel of the river last mentioned to the mouth of

the Sioux or Calumet river; thence in a direct line to the

middle of the main channel of the St. Peters river, where the Watonwan

river (according to Nicollet's map) enters the same; thence down the

middle of the main channel of said river to the middle of the main

channel of the Mississippi river; thence down the middle of the main

channel of said river to the place of beginning."

In accordance with the act of the Legislative Assembly of February 12,

1844, and section six of the "Schedule" it was provided that the new

Constitution, "together with whatever conditions may be made to the

same by Congress, shall be ratified or rejected by a vote of the

qualified electors of this Territory at the Township elections in

April next." And the General Assembly of the State was authorized to

"ratify or reject any conditions Congress may make to this

Constitution after the first Monday in April next."

At the same time it was made the duty of the President of the

Convention to transmit a copy of the Constitution, along with other

documents thereto pertaining, to the Iowa Delegate at Washington, to

be by him presented to Congress as a request for the admission of Iowa

into the Union. For such admission at an early day the Convention, as

memorialists for the people of the Territory, confidently relied upon

"the guarantee in the third article of the treaty between the United

States and France" of the year 1803.

It now remained for Congress and the people of the Territory to pass

judgment upon the Constitution of 1844.

History of the Constitutions of Iowa · 第 25 / 42 题