BY J. IVES PEASE.

Old Shoddy sits in his easy-chair,

And cracks his jokes and drinks his ale,

Dumb to the shivering soldier's prayer,

Deaf to the widows' and orphans' wail.

_His_ coat is warm as the fleece unshorn;

Of a 'golden fleece' he is dreaming still:

And the music that lulls him, night and morn,

Is the hum-hum-hum of the shoddy-mill.

Clashing cylinders, whizzing wheels,

Rend and ravel and tear and pick;

What can resist these hooks of steel,

Sharp as the claws of the ancient Nick?

Cast-off mantle of millionaire,

Pestilent vagrant's vesture chill,

Rags of miser or beggar bare,

_All_ are 'grist' for the shoddy-mill.

Worthless waste and worn-out wool,

Flung together--a specious _sham_!

With just enough of the 'fleece' to pull

Over the eyes of poor 'Uncle Sam.'

Cunningly twisted through web and woof,

Not 'shirt of Nessus' such power to kill.

Look! how the prints of his hideous hoof

Track the fiend of the shoddy-mill!

A soldier lies on the frozen ground,

While crack his joints with aches and ails;

A 'shoddy' blanket wraps him round,

His 'shoddy' garments the wind assails.

His coat is 'shoddy,' well 'stuffed' with 'flocks';

He dreams of the flocks on his native hill,

His feverish sense the demon mocks--

The demon that drives the shoddy-mill.

Ay! pierce his tissues with shooting pains,

Tear the muscles and rend the hone,

Fire with frenzy the heart and brain;

Old Rough-Shoddy! your work is done!

Never again shall the bugle-blast

Waken the sleeper that lies so still;

His dream of home and glory's past:

Fatal's the 'work' of the shoddy-mill.

Struck by 'shoddy,' and not by 'shells,'

And not by shot, our brave ones fall.

Greed of gold the story tells.

Drop the mantle and spread the pall.

Out! on the vampires! out! on those

Who of our life-blood take their fill.

No _meaner_ 'traitor' the nation knows,

Than the greedy ghoul of the shoddy-mill!

* * * * *

Some years ago, a German writer informed his astonished readers:

'Thieves are so rare in America, that I observe, from reading their

journals, that those who are curious in such studies are obliged to

offer a reward to find them.' To judge from a recent attempt at

imposition in New-York, one might suppose that negroes were so rare in

this country that we are obliged to imitate them, by way of keeping up

the supply. Not long ago, a young woman, named Perry, and a Dr. Perkins,

of Oneida county, engaged with a broker of the curb-stone persuasion to

show off the lady as a case of gradual external carbonization; it being

asserted that for four years her body had gradually been turning to

charcoal! Examination by Dr. Mott and others revealed the fact that 'the

supposed epidermis was made of woven cotton, into which charcoal mixed

with gum had been worked.' This was tightly gummed to the fair dame, who

was to have been exhibited 'in style' in a stylish house in Fourth

street; but who was taken to Bellevue Hospital, to be 'ungummed,' as the

French say of people who are turned out of place and lose their

chances--as this damsel did. The incident will doubtless, at a future

day, find a conspicuous place in the history of remarkable impostures.

As it is, we conclude with the remark of a friend, to the effect that

the lady, by putting the Coal On, had brought herself to a Full Stop!

* * * * *

We are indebted to the Amsterdam (N. Y.) _Weekly Dispatch_ for remarks

to the effect that THE CONTINENTAL MAGAZINE is reaching a point in

American literature seldom gained at so early a period by any young

magazine. 'We hail its independence of thought as the development of a

new era in the literature of our land. Its matter is high-toned and

interesting, it is the _most outspoken_ print we know of, and its

outspokenness is the result of a fresh and vigorous life that is not

warped by petty conventionalities.'

We thank our editorial friend for his compliment, and sincerely trust

that those who have followed us in our career will not disagree with

him. We honestly and earnestly believe that we _are_ outspoken and

independent, and accountable in no earthly way to any one, or aught save

our conscience and the public. We can imagine no measure for the good of

the people, which we would not urge heart and soul, and we most

certainly know of no public official, in any capacity, whom we should

feel bound to spare in the event of his unworthiness becoming patent. We

are neither Radical nor Conservative, neither anti-capital nor

anti-poor-man's rights, but hold to the great and glorious creed of

Labor and Intelligence hand in hand with Capital, and the harmony of

their interests. We believe in constantly enlarging the area of human

freedom, holding that the freer and more responsible you make a man,

the more, as a rule, will you stimulate him to improve himself.

And we detest from our very soul the Southern-planter and

Northern-democratic-conservative doctrine that society should consist of

two grades, the first being the mudsill poor, to whom certain

protections and privileges should be granted, and are due by the second

or the 'higher classes;' holding that a free American, beyond a good

education (to which every tax-payer contributes) should claim 'nothing

from any body,' and that the less use is made of such phrases as 'lower

orders,' 'aristocracy,' and 'social nobility,' the more creditable will

it be for man or woman, let their 'position' be what it will.

This war has inaugurated a new era when earnest, honest thought, and

bold straightforward speech alone can effect any thing. It is the time

for fearlessness and straightforwardness if there ever was one in our

history. We have a great war in hand, and great political reforms and

measures of tremendous importance are crowding thickly around it, while

others, not less mighty, are looming dimly behind them. The great

principles of Republicanism, of man's capacity for self-government, of

freedom and of progress, have been brought to 'the struggle for life,'

and it depends upon our national American energy and _honesty_ to

determine whether they shall live. If they _are_ to live, we shall be

first among nations, not in the narrow, wretched sense of old-fashioned

diplomacy, but in the high Christian sense of aiding all oppressed

humanity in their hopes of attaining their rights. But if these

principles are to perish--better would it be for this whole land to

become a wilderness, and every life a death, than that we should survive

the degradation. We have not yet sunk so low that there is no truth left

worth dying for. There was a time when men, women, and children were

martyred by countless thousands for their fidelity to the faith that

extended the same religious rights to all, and now that time has come

again to us, calling for fresh sacrifices to the same principle as

regards earthly rights and the common happiness of mankind.

But we believe that the truth will prevail, after a sore trial, and that

we shall be rewarded to the full. 'No cross, no crown.' But there is a

crown after the cross, and God will give it to us. We are passing

through the baptism of fire--and verily we needed it, both South and

North. The South had become mad with vanity and aristocracy; the North

was, is still, corrupt and rotten beyond all healthy life, with such

villainy in 'politics,' and such indifference to all that was noble and

honorable through the greed of gold, that honest and able men were cast

aside, or at best, used as mere tools by the 'intelligent.' Now we are

in the struggle for life, and rascals, whether of the Union or of the

confederacy, will sooner or later be tried, tested, and rejected. The

people are very patient, and they can be for a long time fooled with

this or that man's reputed honesty and ability. But we have come to the

time of trial, and the people will soon find who is false and what is

_true_.

It is not to be expected that in one year, or in two, the country will

be rid of all the old, corrupt politicians and demagogues who

continually work every subject of public interest into the question of a

'party.' But it is gratifying to observe that, whether Radical or

Conservative, such men are beginning to be regarded with contempt. In

times like these, _we_, at least, blame no man for honestly advocating

any policy which he thinks will aid the Union cause. But the country was

never more disgusted than it is at present, with men who use politics as

a mere trade by which to live. The infamy which has attached to the

miserable and imbecile Buchanan, that type of degraded, pettifogging

diplomacy, is rapidly extending to his whole tribe--and their name is

legion. It is significant that a bank, whose notes bore as vignette a

portrait of the ex-honorable ex-President, has been obliged to call them

in, and substitute another device, since so many of the bills were

marked beneath the picture with such words as 'traitor,' and 'Judas

Iscariot.'

The _people_ are 'all right' in this struggle: but they are awaking very

rapidly to the fact that those in power _must_ be honest or able. The

coming year is to witness either a grand sifting or a tremendous

protest, whose thunder-tones will be heard through all history. It is

all very well for conservatives to lay the blame on their enemies and

yell for their blood; to recommend the assassination of Charles Sumner,

as has been done by one Boston journal; or the hanging of all leading

Radicals, as recommended time and again by the New-York _Herald_; but

this will not satisfy the people who can not see how the country is to

be saved by holding up and aiding the enemy. Neither, on the other hand,

will the people long regard with favor any persons of the opposite

party, who are suspected of having managed the war for their own selfish

purposes. The old hacks who can only live for personal preferment and

for plunder, will be found out, and their places taken by honester and

younger men, whose minds will have been shaped, not in by-gone political

pettifogging, but in the great earnest needs of the times--in honor and

in truth.

* * * * *

Even before authentic copies of General Butler's famed 'Woman Order' had

reached us, it was generally understood that he had really done very

little more than enforce an already existing local law; yet 'with the

word' there went up a squall from the democratic press, clamoring for

his instant removal; so angry were the 'Conservatives' that any thing

should be said or done which would in any way injure the

'susceptibilities' of their beloved rebel friends.

If we are really _at war_, it is neither fit nor proper that such

expressions of sympathy for the enemy should continually appear, to keep

alive in the heart of the foe continual hopes of Northern aid. What does

the reader think, for instance, of such a paragraph as the following

from the Washington correspondence of the New-York _Herald_--which has

been copied with commendation by its colleagues:

'All conservative men here are shocked at the sweeping measures of

confiscation proposed by the radicals. They provide substantially

for the abolition of slavery, because slaveholders, for the most

part, are considered as rebels by these bills. _There are a quarter

of a million of slaveholders_, and a quarter of a million of other

property-holders in the South, _that would be made beggars by the

execution of this programme_. It is pretended that this wholesale

confiscation is for the purpose of compensating for the expenses of

the war; but none will dare to go into the Africanized South among

an infuriated people to purchase estates. It is proposed, also, to

arm the negroes, and in effect make them superior to the million of

whites, who are to be deprived of their property. Of course, under

such circumstances, there will be no cotton or other crops, nor any

demand for Northern manufactures from the South.'

Really! and so legislation at Washington is to be conducted with special

reference to protecting the property of the rebels! No confiscation,

forsooth, because the half million of rebels who have plunged us into

this iniquitous and horrible war, in the hope of utterly ruining us,

might thereby be reduced to poverty! Northern men may pay a million a

day in taxes, but the select slaveholding few who caused the taxation

are to be exempted. How shallow is the concluding '_of course_, under

such circumstances there will be no demand for Northern manufactures

from the South.' Will there not? Wait until the South has been well

subdued, thoroughly Butlered and vigorously Northed; wait till the

Yankee is at home there, and then see if there will be 'no demand for

Northern manufactures.' Quite as tender to the rebels is the spirit of

the following from the Boston _Post_ of May 31st:

'Senator Sumner,' a correspondent writes, 'in an argument against

the proposed tax on cotton, not only opposed it as _an act of

injustice to the unrepresented South_--for grain, hemp, and flax

are left untouched--but as oppressive on manufacturers.' Mr.

Sumner's sense of justice is called into exercise only when it

suits its owner's convenience. He has no thought of 'injustice to

the unrepresented South,' when he wishes to tax negroes, emancipate

slaves, and confiscate Southern property.'

Such remarks require no comment. If a rebel in arms, disgraced by every

infamy of treason, is only to be treated as his representatives would

like, then it is indeed time for the honest friends of the Union to

inquire what safeguard we have in the future against national ruin?

* * * * *

The Continental Monthly, Vol. 2 No 4, October, 1862 Devoted To Literature And National Policy · 第 47 / 86 题