CHAPTER V

A MURDER MYSTERY

One day I entered the _Tribune_ office just as a tip came in of

a tragedy in the little village of Winnetka, in the northern suburbs.

Henry Lloyd, an editorial writer, lived there, and his wife had

telephoned that old Mr. Willson and his invalid wife had been found

horribly murdered in their home. The city editor directed me to go

after the story and I was the first one from the city to reach the

scene of the crime.

I found a crowd of excited villagers gathered at the home of the

murdered couple, but not one among them could tell much more than

that Mr. Willson was president of Winnetka, and its richest citizen

and that Mrs. Willson was so eccentric that servants would not remain

with them. For years they had lived alone, Mr. Willson caring for his

crazed wife and doing the housework. He was rated a millionaire and

had the reputation among his neighbors of being stingy, and a hard

man in business dealings. The murder was a mystery. No clues had been

discovered; no one was suspected.

Neal McKeague, who kept a butcher shop nearby, had been the last to see

the old man alive. He had told how Mr. Willson came into his shop the

night before and selected a larger steak than customary because he was

expecting company from Chicago. I inquired for the butcher and was told

that he had taken an early train to the city, leaving immediately after

the tragedy was discovered. He wouldn’t be back until night. His shop

was closed.

The Willson homestead was an attractive place, occupying an entire

block, the large, old-fashioned house standing in the middle, almost

concealed from the street by the great elm trees with which it was

surrounded. The village constable let me into the house through a

window. On the floor of the living-room was the body of the murdered

millionaire, a bullet wound in his breast. He had been shot through

the heart. There were signs of a violent struggle. The old man had

evidently made a hard fight for his life. Furniture was overturned

and near the body was an empty metal box, in which money and valuable

papers had probably been kept. Some of the papers, deeds and mortgages

among them, were scattered about the room, tossed hurriedly aside by

the murderer while searching for whatever he was after. There was no

money. If there had been it had been taken.

The constable showed me a vest button he found on the floor of the

living-room. There were broken threads in the eye to which bits of

shoddy were clinging. We compared it with the buttons of Mr. Willson’s

vest and found it distinctly different. Evidently it had been wrenched

from the vest of the murderer during the struggle. I cautioned the

constable to take good care of the button, as it might prove important

in identifying the murderer. It was the only clue.

When the constable led me to the floor above I was confronted with the

most gruesome sight I ever beheld. On a bed was the brutally mutilated

body of old Mrs. Willson the face horribly crushed. Everything near it

was bespattered with blood. What struck me as peculiar was that she had

not been shot to death, like her husband. There was no sign of a bullet

wound. The implements with which she was slain were on the floor. She

had first been beaten with a pair of heavy tongs the murderer had

snatched from the fireplace, and when they had come apart he had used

the saber of her dead soldier son that had hung in a scabbard on the

wall. The scabbard was dented by the savage blows that had been dealt

on the poor woman’s head.

Assuming that both Mr. Willson and Mrs. Willson had been killed by the

same person, why wasn’t the revolver used for both murders?

What prompted the murderer to discard the easier weapon after shooting

his first victim?

Why was Mrs. Willson so cruelly butchered?

These were the confusing thoughts that raced through my brain as I

gazed on the sickening tragedy. Descending the staircase, I noticed a

blood smear on the wallpaper, the entire length of the stairs, as if

made by a bloody raincoat. It had rained all of the night before.

We went into the kitchen to look for indications of company having been

there for supper, but the dishes from the evening meal had been washed

and put away. Everything was in order. We looked in the refrigerator

and searched the garbage can for traces of the steak the village

butcher said had been bought in anticipation of visitors coming to

supper from Chicago. There was not a scrap of meat to be found. If

company had come from Chicago, they couldn’t have remained long, else

how could the dishes have been put away and no remaining signs of the

evening meal be apparent, between their departure and the coming of the

murderer. Surely, if the visitors from Chicago had committed the crime,

they wouldn’t have remained to clear away the supper table and wash and

put away the dishes and silverware. The more I thought about this the

more desirous I became for the butcher to return from the city and tell

me what he could.

The crime had been discovered by a school-teacher, the only person

in the village who was privileged to come to the Willson home. The

constable summoned her from the crowd to tell me her story. It wasn’t

much. Mr. Willson had sent her a note the previous evening, asking her

to come in the morning and look after his wife, as he had to go into

the city on business. He would go by an early train, but she would find

the key to the front door under the mat. When she got to the house she

was surprised to find that the blinds had not been opened. The key

was not under the mat. As all of the doors were locked, she lifted a

window sash and crawled into the living-room. Mr. Willson lay dead on

the floor. There was a pool of blood near the body and the overturned

furniture and scattered papers told of a tragedy. She went no farther

and hurried from the house.

The first person she met as she ran excitedly up the street was butcher

McKeague. She told him what she had discovered, but he directed her

to tell others as he was on his way to the depot to catch a train for

Chicago.

She hurried on and spread the news as she went. This was about all she

could tell me. The only relative she ever heard of was James Appleton

Willson, a nephew. He was a Chicago real estate man, not on good terms

with his uncle and never visited at his home. Nor were there ever

any visitors. The school-teacher was the only villager who had been

permitted to enter the house since Mrs. Willson lost her mind. It was a

touching story of a husband’s devotion that she told me. He never left

her if he could avoid it, shutting his home against his neighbors that

her demented condition might not attract curious attention. For years

he had cared for her as tenderly as if she had been a sick child.

The next train from Chicago brought a squad of reporters and a

half-dozen Pinkerton detectives, with Superintendent Robertson of the

Pinkerton agency personally to direct the men. They began searching for

clues in the usual way. When Neal McKeague returned from the city he

was asked to tell about Mr. Willson coming to his place for a steak the

evening before and what was said about expecting visitors. Robertson

seemed to attach considerable importance to the statement, although I

told him that I had learned from the station agent that no strangers

arrived on any of the evening trains. The detectives suggested that

they might have driven out from Chicago. It was before the days of

motor cars. Drive twenty miles in a rainstorm when there were numerous

trains! I couldn’t reconcile it with my way of reasoning.

I learned from some of the villagers that Mr. Willson had befriended

McKeague, selling him the property where his shop stood on the

easy-payment plan and loaning him the money with which to establish

himself in business. There had been some ill feeling when McKeague

discovered that the lot where his shop stood had once belonged to the

village and that Mr. Willson couldn’t give clear title to it. The day

before the tragedy they had words about the title in the village post

office and Mr. Willson had angrily demanded the money that was due him.

McKeague was a good-looking young Canadian who had been employed

in a shop where Mr. Willson formerly traded. The close-fisted old

millionaire fell out with his butcher over prices and partly out of

spite and to establish a competitive shop, he set the butcher’s helper

up in business.

What impressed me strongly was that when McKeague was told of the

murder by the school-teacher he hurried off to Chicago without stopping

to investigate. I called his attention to this and he attempted to

explain by saying that he had promised to pay an overdue bill that

morning at a wholesale market and he was afraid if he delayed doing

so his meat supply would be shut off. He gave me the name of the

wholesaler with whom he traded and the names and addresses of persons

he had called on during the day. He appeared to have perfect control

and to answer without show of irritation any questions that were asked

him.

I couldn’t help thinking that McKeague knew more about the tragedy than

he professed to. That night I wrote a story that pointed a finger of

suspicion at McKeague.

I followed up the story the next day by visiting all of the addresses

the butcher had furnished, and one that he didn’t mention. At a

wholesale market on North Clark Street, where he was being pressed for

payment of a bill, I learned that in settling his account he tendered

a bank note of large denomination that had never been creased. This

further excited my suspicion, for a village butcher was not likely to

have so large a bank note come to him in his trade and the added fact

that it had never been creased by frequent handling, inspired a thought

that it had recently been in Mr. Willson’s treasure box that I had seen

on the floor near his dead body.

Inquiry revealed that at none of the places where he visited did

McKeague once mention the shocking tragedy that had been uncovered a

few minutes before he came to the city. I reasoned that an innocent man

would have talked of little else, particularly when the victim was the

most important man in his home town and his benefactor.

The place that he visited and didn’t tell me about, I found by

accident. After making the round of the addresses furnished by McKeague

I started for Winnetka to learn what the detectives had discovered

during the day. While crossing Wells Street bridge to reach the

Northwestern railroad station, a tugboat darted from under the bridge,

belching sooty smoke over me and soiling my linen.

I stepped into a small shop for a clean collar. The clerk said my

collar wasn’t so badly soiled as one a customer wore in the previous

morning. His was stained with blood. I don’t know why I asked, news

instinct, perhaps, but I did ask what time it was the customer called

and the time the clerk gave me corresponded with the arrival of the

train that brought the butcher from Winnetka. His description of the

customer tallied with McKeague.

The clerk told me that when the customer removed the bloodstained

collar he exclaimed: “I was in a hell of a fight last night.” After

putting on a fresh collar the customer went to the back of the shop and

had a tailor replace a missing button on his vest!

The next morning the heading over my story on the front page of the

_Tribune_ was: “THOU ART THE MAN!”

Superintendent Robertson was called off the case by the Pinkertons and

in his place came blue-eyed Jim Maginn, the ablest detective I ever

came in contact with. He had brains and he knew how to use them. Once

he struck a trail he was as tenacious as a bull dog. He had read my

story that morning and he followed up the lead.

In the heap of ashes back of McKeague’s shop Maginn found some metal

buttons and decided that the butcher had burned the bloodstained

raincoat that smeared the wallpaper in the Willson home. Next he

searched the butcher’s bedroom and in a closet found a vest from which

a button had been yanked with such force that it left a hole. Another

button, different from the others, had been sewed on without much

effort to darn the hole. There were stains on the vest that looked like

blood, but this didn’t count for much as a butcher might have blood

on any of his clothing. The detective said a chemical analysis of the

stains would determine if the corpuscles were of human blood.

While Maginn was finding the vest, I got possession of another

important link in the chain of circumstantial evidence. It was a

revolver with which I shall always believe McKeague killed the old

millionaire. I had luncheon that day at the home of Mr. Lloyd, of

the _Tribune_ editorial staff, and Mrs. Lloyd, who had taken an

active interest in the tragedy handed me a small weapon she had found

beneath the mattress in her maid’s room, the significance of which was

that Belle Hagin, the maid, was McKeague’s sweetheart. On examining

the weapon I found that the cylinder would not revolve. Evidently the

cylinder pin had been lost and the round nail that had been put in its

place prevented the cylinder from turning. One could fire a single

shot, but the next time the trigger was pressed the hammer fell on the

empty cartridge. This cleared up the mystery in my mind as to why the

murderer discarded the revolver after shooting Mr. Willson and attacked

the helpless old woman with tongs and saber.

I reasoned that after the quarrel in the post office, McKeague went

to the Willson house, where the quarrel was renewed, and that when

Mr. Willson brought out his box of valuables there was a struggle and

he was shot. Mrs. Willson heard the shot and screamed and McKeague,

realizing that she knew who killed her husband, ran up the stairs

to her room. Unable to fire his weapon again, he grabbed the first

implement his eyes fell upon and beat her to death.

I hurried to Maginn with the revolver and after telling him my theory,

suggested that McKeague be taken into custody. He didn’t want to make

an arrest without consulting Mr. Pinkerton, so he instructed his men

not to lose sight of the butcher and returned to Chicago with his newly

discovered evidence.

The vest was turned over to a famous microscopist and I recall how

excited I got when the vest was put under a powerful glass and the

threads in the eyes of the detached button matched the broken threads

in the vest, for under the microscope the threads were magnified to the

size of a half-inch rope. The shreds of woolly fluff clinging to the

torn threads in the eyes of the button, were identical with the shade

and texture of the shoddy of the vest.

The heading over my story the next morning was: “THE SHADOW OF A

NOOSE.”

Before noon McKeague was brought to Chicago and placed in jail.

Although the evidence against him was purely circumstantial, the

general opinion was that he would be easily convicted, but Belle Hagin

helped to save him by testifying that she took the revolver from him

at a party one night when he had been drinking, two months before the

tragedy. She swore that it was hidden ever since under her mattress

and was there on the night the Willsons were murdered. Luther Laflin

Mills, the then prosecuting attorney, was blamed for the acquittal by

the newspapers and the criticism was not undeserved, for the prosecutor

went away on a long fishing trip in Canada and did not return to

Chicago in time properly to prepare the case for trial.

McKeague celebrated his acquittal by getting drunk and a few days later

he returned to Canada. Within a month he was in jail for felonious

assault on a woman. Some time after that Belle Hagin admitted that

she didn’t tell the truth about the revolver at the trial and the

Pinkertons were about to arrest him again and put him on trial for the

murder of Mrs. Willson, but a cowboy spared them from further trouble

by killing McKeague in a bar-room brawl out in North Dakota.

Charles Chapin's story · 第 5 / 15 章