Another proof that 'public opinion,' in the slave states, plunders,

tortures, and murders the slaves, instead of _protecting_ them, is

found in the fact, that the laws of slave states inflict _capital_

punishment on slaves for a variety of crimes, for which, if their

masters commit them, the legal penalty is merely _imprisonment_. Judge

Stroud in his Sketch of the Laws of Slavery, says, that by the laws of

Virginia, there are 'seventy-one crimes for which slaves are capitally

punished though in none of these are whites punished in manner more

severe than by imprisonment in the penitentiary.' (P. 107, where the

reader will find all the crimes enumerated.) It should be added,

however, that though the penalty for each of these seventy-one crimes

is 'death,' yet a majority of them are, in the words of the law,

'death within clergy;' and in Virginia, _clergyable_ offences, though

_technically_ capital, are not so in fact. In Mississippi, slaves are

punished capitally for more than _thirty_ crimes, for which whites are

punished only by fine or imprisonment, or both. Eight of these are not

_recognized as crimes_, either by common law or by statute, when

committed by whites. In South Carolina slaves are punished capitally

for _nine_ more crimes than the whites--in Georgia, for _six_--and in

Kentucky, for _seven_ more than whites, &c. We surely need not detain

the reader by comments on this monstrous inequality with which the

penal codes of slave states treat slaves and their masters. When we

consider that guilt is in proportion to intelligence, and that these

masters have by law doomed their slaves to ignorance, and then, as

they darkle and grope along their blind way, inflict penalties upon

them for a variety of acts regarded as praise worthy in whites;

killing them for crimes, when whites are only fined or imprisoned--to

call such a 'public opinion' inhuman, savage, murderous, diabolical,

would be to use tame words, if the English vocabulary could supply

others of more horrible import.

But slaveholding brutality does not stop here. While punishing the

slaves for crimes with vastly greater severity than it does their

masters for the same crimes, and making a variety of acts _crimes_ in

law, which are right, and often _duties_, it persists in refusing to

make known to the slaves that complicated and barbarous penal code

which loads them with such fearful liabilities. The slave is left to

get a knowledge of these laws as he can, and cases must be of constant

occurrence at the south, in which slaves get their first knowledge of

the existence of a law by suffering its penalty. Indeed, this is

probably the way in which they commonly learn what the laws are; for

how else can the slave get a knowledge of the laws? He cannot

_read_--he cannot _learn_ to read; if he try to master the alphabet,

so that he may spell out the words of the law, and thus avoid its

penalties, the law shakes its terrors at him; while, at the same time,

those who made the laws refuse to make them known to those for whom

they are designed. The memory of Caligula will blacken with execration

while time lasts, because be hung up his laws so high that people

could not read them, and then punished them because they did not keep

them. Our slaveholders aspire to blacker infamy. Caligula was content

with hanging up his laws where his subjects could _see_ them; and if

they could not read them, they knew where they were, and might get at

them, if, in their zeal to learn his will, they had used the same

means to get up to them that those did who hung them there. Even

Caligula, wretch as he was, would have shuddered at cutting their legs

off, to prevent their climbing to them; or, if they had got there, at

boring their eyes out, to prevent their reading them. Our slaveholders

virtually do both; for they prohibit their slaves acquiring that

knowledge of letters which would enable them to read the laws; and if,

by stealth, they get it in spite of them, they prohibit them books and

papers, and flog them if they are caught at them. Further--Caligula

merely hung his laws so high that they could not be _read_--our

slaveholders have hung theirs so high above the slave that they cannot

be _seen_--they are utterly out of sight, and he finds out that they

are there only by the falling of the penalties on his head.[35] Thus

the "public opinion" of slave states protects the defenceless slave by

arming a host of legal penalties and setting them in ambush at every

thicket along his path, to spring upon him unawares.

[Footnote 35: The following extract from the Alexandria (D.C.) Gazette

is all illustration. "CRIMINALS CONDEMNED.--On Monday last the Court

of the borough of Norfolk, Va. sat on the trial of four negro boys

arraigned for burglary. The first indictment charged them with

breaking into the hardware store of Mr. E.P. Tabb, upon which two of

them were found guilty by the Court, and condemned to suffer the

penalty of the law, which, in the case of a slave, is death. The

second Friday in April is appointed for the execution of their awful

sentence. _Their ages do not exceed sixteen_. The first, a fine active

boy, belongs to a widow lady in Alexandria; the latter, a house

servant, is owned by a gentleman in the borough. The value of one was

fixed at $1000, and the other at $800; which sums are to be

re-imbursed to their respective owners out of the state treasury." In

all probability these poor boys, who are to be hung for stealing,

never dreamed that death was the legal penalty of the crime.

Here is another, from the "New Orleans Bee" of ---- 14, 1837--"The

slave who STRUCK some citizens in Canal street, some weeks since, has

been tried and found guilty, and is sentenced to be HUNG on the 24th."]

Stroud, in his Sketch of the Laws of Slavery, page 100, thus comments

on this monstrous barbarity.

"The hardened convict moves their sympathy, and is to be taught the

laws before he is expected to obey them;[36] yet the guiltless slave

is subjected to an extensive system of cruel enactments, of no part of

which, probably, has he ever heard."

[Footnote 36: "It shall be the duty of the keeper [of the penitentiary]

on the receipt of each prisoner, to _read_ to him or her such parts of

the penal laws of this state as impose penalties for escape, and to

make all the prisoners in the penitentiary acquainted with the same.

It shall also be his duty, on the discharge of such prisoner, to read

to him or her such parts of the laws as impose additional punishments

for the repetition of offences."--_Rule 12th_, for the internal

government of the Penitentiary of Georgia. Sec. 26 of the Penitentiary

Act of 1816.--Prince's Digest, 386.]

Having already drawn so largely on the reader's patience, in

illustrating southern 'public opinion' by the slave laws, instead of

additional illustrations of the same point from another class of those

laws, as was our design, we will group together a few particulars,

which the reader can take in at a glance, showing that the "public

opinion" of slaveholders towards their slaves, which exists at the

south, in the form of law, tramples on all those fundamental

principles of right, justice, and equity, which are recognized as

sacred by all civilized nations, and receive the homage even of

barbarians.

1. One of these principles is, that the _benefits_ of law to the

subject should overbalance its burdens--its protection more than

compensate for its restraints and exactions--and its blessings

altogether outweigh its inconveniences and evils--the former being

numerous, positive, and permanent, the latter few, negative, and

incidental. Totally the reverse of all this is true in the case of the

slave. Law is to him all exaction and no protection: instead of

lightening his _natural_ burdens, it crushes him under a multitude of

artificial ones; instead of a friend to succor him, it is his

deadliest foe, transfixing him at every step from the cradle to the

grave. Law has been beautifully defined to be "benevolence acting by

rule;" to the American slave it is malevolence torturing by system. It

is an old truth, that _responsibility_ increases with _capacity_; but

those same laws which make the slave a "_chattel_," require of him

_more_ than of _men_. The same law which makes him a _thing_ incapable

of obligation, loads him with obligations superhuman--while sinking

him below the level of a brute in dispensing its _benefits_, he lays

upon him burdens which would break down an angel.

2. _Innocence is entitled to the protection of law._ Slaveholders make

innocence free plunder; this is their daily employment; their laws

assail it, make it their victim, inflict upon it all, and, in some

respects, more than all the penalties of the greatest guilt. To other

innocent persons, law is a blessing, to the slave it is a curse, only

a curse and that continually.

3. _Deprivation of liberty is one of the highest punishments of

crime_; and in proportion to its justice when inflicted on the guilty,

is its injustice when inflicted on the innocent; this terrible penalty

is inflicted on two million seven hundred thousand, innocent persons

in the Southern states.

4. _Self-preservation and self-defence_, are universally regarded as

the most sacred of human rights, yet the laws of slave states punish

the slave with _death_ for exercising these rights in that way, which

in others is pronounced worthy of the highest praise.

5. _The safeguards of law are most needed where natural safe-guards

are weakest._ Every principle of justice and equity requires, that,

those who are totally unprotected by birth, station, wealth, friends,

influence, and popular favor, and especially those who are the

innocent objects of public contempt and prejudice, should be more

vigilantly protected by law, than those who are so fortified by

defence, that they have far less need of _legal_ protection; yet the

poor slave who is fortified by _none_ of these _personal_ bulwarks, is

denied the protection of law, while the master, surrounded by them

all, is panoplied in the mail of legal protection, even to the hair of

his head; yea, his very shoe-tie and coat-button are legal protegees.

6. The grand object of law is to _protect men's natural rights_, but

instead of protecting the natural rights of the slaves, it gives

slaveholders license to wrest them from the weak by violence, protects

them in holding their plunder, and _kills_ the rightful owner if he

attempt to recover it.

This is the _protection_ thrown around the rights of American slaves

by the 'public opinion,' of slaveholders; these the restraints that

hold back their masters, overseers, and drivers, from inflicting

injuries upon them!

In a Republican government, _law_ is the pulse of its _heart_--as the

heart beats the pulse beats, except that it often beats _weaker_ than

the heart, never stronger--or to drop the figure, laws are never

_worse_ than those who make them, very often better. If human history

proves anything, cruelty of practice will always go beyond cruelty of

law.

Law-making is a formal, deliberate act, performed by persons of mature

age, embodying the intelligence, wisdom, justice and humanity, of the

community; performed, too, at leisure, after full opportunity had for

a comprehensive survey of all the relations to be affected, after

careful investigation and protracted discussion. Consequently laws

must, in the main, be a true index of the permanent feelings, the

settled _frame of mind_, cherished by the community upon those

subjects, and towards those persons and classes whose condition the

laws are designed to establish. If the laws are in a high degree cruel

and inhuman, towards any class of persons, it proves that the feelings

habitually exercised towards that class of persons, by those who make

and perpetuate those laws, are at least _equally_ cruel and inhuman.

We say _at least equally_ so; for if the _habitual_ state of feeling

towards that class be unmerciful, it must be unspeakably cruel,

relentless and malignant when _provoked_; if its _ordinary_ action is

inhuman, its contortions and spasms must be tragedies; if the waves

run high when there has been no wind, where will they not break when

the tempest heaves them!

Further, when cruelty is the _spirit_ of the law towards a proscribed

class, when it _legalizes great outrages_ upon them, it connives at,

and abets _greater_ outrages, and is virtually an accomplice of all

who perpetrate them. Hence, in such cases, though the _degree_ of the

outrage is illegal, the perpetrator will rarely be convicted, and,

even if convicted, will be almost sure to escape punishment. This is

not _theory_ but _history_. Every judge and lawyer in the slave states

_knows_, that the legal conviction and _punishment_ of masters and

mistresses, for illegal outrages upon their slaves, is an event which

has rarely, if ever, occurred in the slave states; they know, also,

that although _hundreds_ of slaves have been _murdered_ by their

masters and mistresses in the slave states, within the last

twenty-five years, and though the fact of their having committed those

murders has been established beyond a _doubt_ in the minds of the

surrounding community, yet that the murderers have not, in a single

instance, suffered the penalty of the law.

Finally, since slaveholders have deliberately legalized the

perpetration of the most cold-blooded atrocities upon their slaves,

and do pertinaciously refuse to make these atrocities _illegal_, and

to punish those who perpetrate them, they stand convicted before the

world, upon their own testimony, of the most barbarous, brutal, and

habitual inhumanity. If this be slander and falsehood, their own lips

have uttered it, their own fingers have written it, their own acts

have proclaimed it; and however it may be with their _morality_, they

have too much human nature to perjure themselves for the sake of

publishing their own infamy.

Having dwelt at such length on the legal code of the slave states,

that unerring index of the public opinion of slaveholders towards

their slaves; and having shown that it does not protect the slaves

from cruelty, and that even in the few instances in which the letter

of the law, if _executed_, would afford some protection, it is

virtually nullified by the connivance of courts and juries, or by

popular clamor; we might safely rest the case here, assured that every

honest reader would spurn the absurd falsehood, that the 'public

opinion' of the slave states protects the slaves and restrains the

master. But, as the assertion is made so often by slaveholders, and

with so much confidence, notwithstanding its absurdity is fully

revealed by their own legal code, we propose to show its falsehood by

applying other tests.

We lay it down as a truth that can be made no plainer by reasoning,

that the same 'public opinion,' which restrains men from _committing_

outrages, will restrain them from _publishing_ such outrages, if they

do commit them;--in other words, if a man is restrained from certain

acts through fear of losing his character, should they become known,

he will not voluntarily destroy his character by _making them known_,

should he be guilty of them. Let us look at this. It is assumed by

slaveholders, that 'public opinion' at the south so frowns on cruelty

to the slaves, that _fear of disgrace_ would restrain from the

infliction of it, were there no other consideration.

Now, that this is sheer fiction is shown by the fact, that the

newspapers in the slaveholding states, teem with advertisements for

runaway slaves, in which the masters and _mistresses_ describe their

men and women, as having been 'branded with a hot iron,' on their

'cheeks,' 'jaws,' 'breasts,' 'arms,' 'legs,' and 'thighs;' also as

'scarred,' 'very much scarred,' 'cut up,' 'marked,' &c. 'with the

whip,' also with 'iron collars on,' 'chains,' 'bars of iron,'

'fetters,' 'bells,' 'horns,' 'shackles,' &c. They, also, describe them

as having been wounded by 'buck-shot,' 'rifle-balls,' &c. fired at

them by their 'owners,' and others when in pursuit; also, as having

'notches,' cut in their ears, the tops or bottoms of their ears 'cut

off,' or 'slit,' or 'one ear cut off' or 'both ears cut off' &c. &c.

The masters and mistresses who thus advertise their runaway slaves,

coolly sign their names to their advertisements, giving the street and

number of their residences, if in cities, their post office address,

&c. if in the country; thus making public proclamation as widely as

possible that _they_ 'brand,' 'scar,' 'gash,' 'cut up,' &c. the flesh

of their slaves; load them with irons, cut off their ears, &c.; they

speak of these things with the utmost _sang froid_, not seeming to

think it possible, that any one will esteem them at all the less

because of these outrages upon their slaves; further, these

advertisements swarm in many of the largest and most widely circulated

political and commercial papers that are published in the slave

states. The editors of those papers constitute the main body of the

literati of the slave states; they move in the highest circle of

society, are among the 'popular' men in the community, and _as a

class_, are more influential than any other; yet these editors publish

these advertisements with iron indifference. So far from proclaiming

to such felons, homicides, and murderers, that they will not be their

blood-hounds, to hunt down the innocent and mutilated victims who have

escaped from their torture, they freely furnish them with every

facility, become their accomplices and share their spoils; and instead

of outraging 'public opinion,' by doing it, they are the men after its

own heart, its organs, its representatives, its _self_.

To show that the 'public opinion' of the slave states, towards the

slaves, is absolutely _diabolical_, we will insert a few, out of a

multitude, of similar advertisements from a variety of southern papers

now before us.

The North Carolina Standard, of July 18, 1838, contains the

following:--

"TWENTY DOLLARS REWARD. Ranaway from the subscriber, a negro woman and

two children; the woman is tall and black, and _a few days before she

went off_, I BURNT HER WITH A HOT IRON ON THE LEFT SIDE OF HER FACE; I

TRIED TO MAKE THE LETTER M, _and she kept a cloth over her head and

face, and a fly bonnet on her head so as to cover the burn;_ her

children are both boys, the oldest is in his seventh year; he is a

_mulatto_ and has blue eyes; the youngest is black and is in his fifth

year. The woman's name is Betty, commonly called Bet."

MICAJAH RICKS.

_Nash County, July 7_, 1838.

Hear the wretch tell his story, with as much indifference as if he

were describing the cutting of his initials in the bark of a tree.

_"I burnt her with a hot iron on the left side of her face,"--"I tried

to make the letter M_," and this he says in a newspaper, and puts his

name to it, and the editor of the paper who is, also, its proprietor,

publishes it for him and pockets his fee. Perhaps the reader will say,

'Oh, it must have been published in an insignificant sheet printed in

some obscure corner of the state; perhaps by a gang of 'squatters,' in

the Dismal Swamp, universally regarded as a pest, and edited by some

scape-gallows, who is detested by the whole community.' To this I reply

that the "North Carolina Standard," the paper which contains it, is a

large six columned weekly paper, handsomely printed and ably edited;

it is the leading Democratic paper in that state, and is published at

Raleigh, the Capital of the state, Thomas Loring, Esq. Editor and

Proprietor. The motto in capitals under the head of the paper is, "THE

CONSTITUTION AND THE UNION OF THE STATES--THEY MUST BE PRESERVED." The

same Editor and Proprietor, who exhibits such brutality of feeling

towards the slaves, by giving the preceding advertisement a

conspicuous place in his columns, and taking his pay for it, has

apparently a keen sense of the proprieties of life, where _whites_ are

concerned, and a high regard for the rights, character and feelings of

those whose skin is colored like his own. As proof of this, we copy

from the number of the paper containing the foregoing advertisement,

the following _Editorial_ on the pending political canvass.

"We cannot refrain from expressing the hope that the Gubernatorial

canvass will be conducted with a _due regard to the character_, and

_feelings_ of the distinguished individuals who are candidates for

that office; and that the press of North Carolina will _set an

example_ in this respect, worthy of _imitation and of praise_."

What is this but chivalrous and honorable feeling? The good name of

North Carolina is dear to him--on the comfort, 'character and

feelings,' of her _white_ citizens he sets a high value; he feels too,

most deeply for the _character of the Press_ of North Carolina, sees

that it is a city set on a hill, and implores his brethren of the

editorial corps to 'set an example' of courtesy and magnanimity worthy

of imitation and praise. Now, reader, put all these things together

and con them over, and then read again the preceding advertisement

contained in the same number of the paper, and you have the true

"North Carolina STANDARD," by which to measure the protection extended

to slaves by the 'public opinion' of that state.

J.P. Ashford advertises as follows in the "Natchez Courier," August

24, 1838.

"Ranaway, a negro girl called Mary, has a small scar over her eye, a

_good many teeth missing_, the letter A. _is branded on her cheek and

forehead_."

A.B. Metcalf thus advertises a woman in the same paper, June 15,

1838.

"Ranaway, Mary, a black woman, has a _scar_ on her back and right arm

near the shoulder, _caused by a rifle ball_."

John Henderson, in the "Grand Gulf Advertiser," August 29, 1838,

advertises Betsey.

"Ranaway, a black woman Betsey, has an _iron bar on her right leg_."

Robert Nicoll, whose residence is in Mobile, in Dauphin street,

between Emmanuel and Conception streets, thus advertises a woman in

the "Mobile Commercial Advertiser."

"TEN DOLLARS REWARD will be given for my negro woman Liby. The said

Liby is about 30 years old and VERY MUCH SCARRED ABOUT THE NECK AND

EARS, occasioned by whipping, had on a handkerchief tied round her

ears, as she COMMONLY wears it to HIDE THE SCARS."

To show that slaveholding brutality now is the same that it was the

eighth of a century ago, we publish the following advertisement from

the "Charleston (S.C.) Courier," of 1825.

"TWENTY DOLLARS REWARD.--Ranaway from the subscriber, on the 14th

instant, a negro girl named Molly.

"The said girl was sold by Messrs. Wm. Payne & Sons, as the property

of an estate of a Mr. Gearrall, and purchased by a Mr. Moses, and sold

by him to a Thomas Prisley, of Edgefield District, of whom I bought

her on the 17th of April, 1819. She is 16 or 17 years of age, slim

made, LATELY BRANDED ON THE LEFT CHEEK, THUS, R, AND A PIECE TAKEN OFF

OF HER EAR ON THE SAME SIDE; THE SAME LETTER ON THE INSIDE OF BOTH HER

LEGS.

"ABNER ROSS, Fairfield District."

But instead of filling pages with similar advertisements, illustrating

the horrible brutality of slaveholders towards their slaves, the

reader is referred to the preceding pages of this work, to the scores

of advertisements written by slaveholders, printed by slaveholders,

published by slaveholders, in newspapers edited by slaveholders and

patronized by slaveholders; advertisement describing not only men and

boys, but women aged and middle-aged, matrons and girls of tender

years, their necks chafed with iron collars with prongs, their limbs

galled with iron rings and chains, and bars of iron, iron hobbles and

shackles, all parts of their persons scarred with the lash, and

branded with hot irons, and torn with rifle bullets, pistol balls and

buck shot, and gashed with knives, their eyes out, their ears cut off,

their teeth drawn out, and their bones broken. He is referred also to

the cool and shocking indifference with which these slaveholders,

'gentlemen' and 'ladies,' Reverends, and Honorables, and Excellencies,

write and print, and publish and pay, and take money for, and read and

circulate, and sanction, such infernal barbarity. Let the reader

ponder all this, and then lay it to heart, that this is that 'public

opinion' of the slaveholders which protects their slaves from all

injury, and is an effectual guarantee of personal security.

However far gone a community may be in brutality, something of

protection may yet be hoped for from its 'public opinion,' if _respect

for woman_ survive the general wreck; that gone, protection perishes;

public opinion becomes universal rapine; outrages, once occasional,

become habitual; the torture, which was before inflicted only by

passion, becomes the constant product of a _system_, and, instead of

being the index of sudden and fierce impulses, is coolly plied as the

permanent means to an end. When _women_ are branded with hot irons on

their faces; when iron collars, with prongs, are riveted about their

necks; when iron rings are fastened upon their limbs, and they are

forced to drag after them chains and fetters; when their flesh is torn

with whips, and mangled with bullets and shot, and lacerated with

knives; and when those who do such things, are regarded in the

community, and associated with as 'gentlemen' and 'ladies;' to say

that the 'public opinion' of _such_ a community is a protection to its

victims, is to blaspheme God, whose creatures they are, cast in his

own sacred image, and dear to him as the apple of his eye.

But we are not yet quite ready to dismiss this protector, 'Public

Opinion.' To illustrate the hardened brutality with which slaveholders

regard their slaves, the shameless and apparently unconscious

indecency with which they speak of their female slaves, examine their

persons, and describe them, under their own signatures, in newspapers,

hand-bills, &c. just as they would describe the marks of cattle and

swine, on all parts of their bodies; we will make a few extracts from

southern papers. Reader, as we proceed to these extracts, remember our

motto--'True humanity consists _not_ in a squeamish ear.'

Mr. P. ABDIE, of New Orleans, advertises in the New Orleans Bee, of

January 29, 1838, for one of his female slaves, as follows;

"Ranaway, the negro wench named Betsey, aged about 22 years,

handsome-faced, and good countenance; having the marks of the whip

behind her neck, and SEVERAL OTHERS ON HER RUMP. The above reward,

($10,) will be given to whoever will bring that wench to P. ABDIE."

The New Orleans Bee, in which the advertisement of this Vandal

appears, is the 'Official Gazette of the State--of the General

Council--and of the first and third Municipalities of New Orleans.' It

is the largest, and the most influential paper in the south-western

states, and perhaps the most ably edited--and has undoubtedly a larger

circulation than any other. It is a daily paper, of $12 a year, and

its circulation being mainly among the larger merchants, planters, and

professional men, it is a fair index of the 'public opinion' of

Louisiana, so far as represented by those classes of persons.

Advertisements equally gross, indecent, and abominable, or nearly so,

can be found in almost every number of that paper.

Mr. WILLIAM ROBINSON, Georgetown, District of Columbia, advertised for

his slave in the National Intelligencer, of Washington City, Oct. 2,

1837, as follows:

"Eloped from my residence a young negress, 22 years old, of a

chestnut, or brown color. She has a very singular mark--this mark, to

the best of my RECOLLECTION, covers a part of her _breasts_, _body_,

and _limbs_; and when her neck and arms are uncovered, is very

perceptible; she has been frequently seen east and south of the

Capitol Square, and is harbored by ill-disposed persons, of every

complexion, for her services."

Mr. JOHN C. BEASLEY, near Huntsville, Alabama, thus advertises a young

girl of eighteen, in the Huntsville Democrat, of August 1st, 1837.

"Ranaway Maria, about 18 years old, _very far advanced with child._"

He then offers a reward to any one who will commit this young girl, in

this condition, _to jail_.

Mr. JAMES T. DE JARNETT, Vernon, Autauga co. Alabama, thus advertises

a woman in the Pensacola Gazette, July 14, 1838. "Celia is a _bright_

copper-colored negress, _fine figure_ and _very smart_. On EXAMINING

HER BACK, you will find marks caused by the whip." He closes the

advertisement, by offering a reward of _five hundred dollars_ to any

person who will lodge her in _jail_, so that he can get her.

A person who lives at 124 Chartres street, New Orleans, advertises in

the 'Bee,' of May 31, for "the negress Patience, about 28 years old,

has _large hips_, and is _bow-legged_." A Mr. T. CUGGY, in the same

paper, thus describes "the negress Caroline." "_She has awkward feet,

clumsy ankles, turns out her toes greatly in walking, and has a sore

on her left shin_."

In another, of June 22, Mr. P. BAHI advertises "Maria, with a clear

white complexion, and _double nipple on her right breast_."

Mr. CHARLES CRAIGE, of Federal Point, New Hanover co. North Carolina,

in the Wilmington Advertiser, August 11, 1837, offers a reward for his

slave Jane, and says "_she is far advanced in pregnancy_."

The New Orleans Bulletin, August 18, 1838, advertises "the negress

Mary, aged nineteen, has a scar on her face, walks parrot-toed, and is

_pregnant_."

Mr. J.G. MUIR, of Grand Gulf, Mississippi, thus advertises a woman in

the Vicksburg Register, December 5, 1838. "Ranaway a negro girl--has a

number of _black lumps on her breasts, and is in a state of

pregnancy_."

Mr. JACOB BESSON, Donaldsonville, Louisiana, advertises in the New

Orleans Bee, August 7, 1838, "the negro woman Victorine--she is

_advanced in pregnancy_."

Mr. J.H. LEVERICH & Co. No. 10, Old Levee, New Orleans, advertises in

the 'Bulletin,' January 22, 1839, as follows.

"$50 REWARD.--Ranaway a negro girl named Caroline about 18 years of

age, is _far advanced in child-bearing_. The above reward will be paid

for her delivery at either of the _jails_ of the city."

Mr. JOHN DUGGAN, thus advertises a woman in the New Orleans Bee, of

Sept. 7.

"Ranaway from the subscriber a mulatto woman, named Esther, about

thirty years of age, _large stomach_, wants her upper front teeth, and

walks pigeon-toed--supposed to be about the lower fauxbourg."

Mr. FRANCIS FOSTER, of Troop co. Georgia, advertises in the Columbus

(Ga.) Enquirer of June 22, 1837--"My negro woman Patsey, has a stoop

in her walking, occasioned by a _severe burn on her abdomen_."

The above are a few specimens of the gross details, in describing the

persons of females, of all ages, and the marks upon all parts of their

bodies; proving incontestably, that slaveholders are in the habit not

only of stripping their female slaves of their clothing, and

inflicting punishment upon their 'shrinking flesh,' but of subjecting

their naked persons to the most minute and revolting inspection, and

then of publishing to the world the results of their examination, as

well as the scars left by their own inflictions upon them, their

length, size, and exact position on the body; and all this without

impairing in the least, the standing in the community of the shameless

wretches who thus proclaim their own abominations. That such things

should not at all affect the standing of such persons in society, is

certainly no marvel: how could they affect it, when the same

communities enact laws _requiring_ their own legal officers to inspect

minutely the persons and bodily marks of all slaves taken up as

runaways, and to publish in the newspapers a particular description of

all such marks and peculiarities of their persons, their size,

appearance position on the body, &c. Yea, verily, when the 'public

opinion' of the community, in the solemn form of law, commands

jailors, sheriffs, captains of police, &c. to divest of their clothing

aged matrons and young girls, minutely examine their naked persons,

and publish the results of their examination--who can marvel, that the

same 'public opinion' should tolerate the slaveholders themselves, in

doing the same things to their own property, which they have appointed

legal officers to do as their proxies.[37]

[Footnote 37: 'As a sample of these laws, we give the following extract

from one of the laws of Maryland, where slaveholding 'public opinion'

exists in its mildest form.'

"It shall be the duty of the sheriffs of the several counties of this

state, upon any runaway servant or slave being committed to his

custody, to cause the same to be advertised, &c. and to make

particular and minute descriptions of _the person and bodily marks_,

of such runaway."--_Laws of Maryland of 1802_, Chap. 96, Sec. 1 and 2.

That the sheriffs, jailors, &c. do not neglect this part of their

official 'duty,' is plain from the minute description which they give

in the advertisements of marks upon all parts of the persons of

females, as well as males; and also from the occasional declaration,

'no scars discoverable on any part,' or 'no marks discoverable _about_

her;' which last is taken from an advertisement in the Milledgeville

(Geo.) Journal, June 26, 1838, signed 'T.S. Denster, Jailor.']

The zeal with which slaveholding '_public opinion_' protects the lives

of the slaves, may be illustrated by the following advertisements,

taken from a multitude of similar ones in southern papers. To show

that slaveholding 'public opinion' is the same _now_, that it was half

a century ago, we will insert, in the first place, an advertisement

published in a North Carolina newspaper, Oct. 29, 1785, by W. SKINNER,

the Clerk of the County of Perquimons, North Carolina.

"Ten silver dollars reward will be paid for apprehending and

delivering to me my man Moses, who ran away this morning; or I will

give five times the sum to any person who will make due proof of his

_being killed_, and never ask a question to know by whom it was done."

W. SKINNER.

_Perquimons County, N.C. Oct. 29, 1785._

The late JOHN PARRISH, of Philadelphia, an eminent minister of the

religious society of Friends, who traveled through the slave states

about _thirty-five years_ since, on a religious mission, published on

his return a pamphlet of forty pages, entitled 'Remarks on the Slavery

of the Black People.' From this work we extract the following

illustrations of 'public opinion' in North and South Carolina and

Virginia at that period.

"When I was traveling through North Carolina, a black man, who was

outlawed, being shot by one of his pursuers, and left wounded in the

woods, they came to an ordinary where I had stopped to feed my horse,

in order to procure a cart to bring the poor wretched object in.

Another, I was credibly informed, was shot, his head cut off, and

carried in a bag by the perpetrators of the murder, who received the

reward, which was said to be $200, continental currency, and that his

head was stuck on a coal house at an iron works in Virginia--and this

for going to visit his wife at a distance. Crawford gives an account

of a man being gibbetted alive in South Carolina, and the buzzards

came and picked out his eyes. Another was burnt to death at a stake in

Charleston, surrounded by a multitude of spectators, some of whom were

people of the _first rank_; ... the poor object was heard to cry, as

long as he could breathe, 'not guilty--not guilty.'"

The following is an illustration of the 'public opinion' of South

Carolina about fifty years ago. It is taken from Judge Stroud's Sketch

of the Slave Laws, page 39.

"I find in the case of 'the State vs. M'Gee,' I Bay's Reports, 164, it

is said incidentally by Messrs. Pinckney and Ford, counsel for the

state (of S.C.), 'that the _frequency_ of the offence (_wilful_ murder

of a slave) was owing to the _nature of the punishment_', &c.... This

remark was made in 1791, when the above trial took place. It was made

in a public place--a courthouse--and by men of great personal

respectability. There can be, therefore, no question as to its

_truth_, and as little of its _notoriety_."

In 1791 the Grand Jury for the district of Cheraw, S.C. made a

_presentment_, from which the following is an extract.

"We, the Grand Jurors of and for the district of Cheraw, do present

the INEFFICACY of the present punishment for killing negroes, as a

great defect in the legal system of this state: and we do earnestly

recommend to the attention of the legislature, that clause of the

negro act, which confines the penalty for killing slaves to fine and

imprisonment only: in full confidence, that they will provide some

other _more effectual_ measures to prevent the FREQUENCY of crimes of

this nature."--_Matthew Carey's American Museum, for Feb.

1791_.--Appendix, p. 10.

The following is a specimen of the 'public opinion' of Georgia twelve

years since. We give it in the strong words of COLONEL STONE, Editor

of the New York Commercial Advertiser. We take it from that paper of

June 8, 1827.

"HUNTING MEN WITH DOGS.-A negro who had absconded from his master, and

for whom a reward of $100 was offered, has been apprehended and

committed to prison in Savannah. The editor, who states the fact,

adds, with as much coolness as though there were no barbarity in the

matter, that he did not surrender till _he was considerably_ MAIMED BY

THE DOGS that had been set on him--desperately fighting them--one of

which he badly cut with a sword."

Twelve days after the publication of the preceding fact, the following

horrible transaction took place in Perry county, Alabama. We extract

it from the African Observer, a monthly periodical, published in

Philadelphia, by the society of Friends. See No. for August, 1827.

"Tuscaloosa, Ala. June 20, 1827.

"Some time during the last week a Mr. M'Neilly having lost some

clothing, or other property of no great value, the slave of a

neighboring planter was charged with the theft. M'Neilly, in company

with his brother, found the negro driving his master's wagon; they

seized him, and either did, or were about to chastise him, when the

negro stabbed M'Neilly, so that he died in an hour afterwards. The

negro was taken before a justice of the peace, who _waved his

authority_, perhaps through fear, as a crowd of persons had collected

to the number of seventy or eighty, near Mr. People's (the justice)

house. _He acted as president of the mob,_ and put the vote, when it

was decided he should be immediately executed by _being burnt to

death_. The sable culprit was led to a tree, and tied to it, and a

large quantity of pine knots collected and placed around him, and the

fatal torch applied to the pile, even against the remonstrances of

several gentlemen who were present; and the miserable being was in a

short time burned to ashes.

"This is the SECOND negro who has been THUS put to death, without

judge or jury, in this county."

The following advertisements, testimony, &c. will show that the

slaveholders of _to-day_ are the _children_ of those who shot, and

hunted with bloodhounds, and burned over slow fires, the slaves of

half a century ago; the worthy inheritors of their civilization,

chivalry, and tender mercies.

The "Wilmington (North Carolina) Advertiser" of July 13, 1838,

contains the following advertisement.

"$100 will be paid to any person who may apprehend and safely confine

in any jail in this state, a certain negro man, named ALFRED. And the

same reward will be paid, if satisfactory evidence is given of _having

been_ KILLED. He has one or more scars on one of his hands, caused by

his having been shot.

"THE CITIZENS OF ONSLOW.

"Richlands, Onslow co. May 16th, 1838."

In the same column with the above and directly under it is the

following:--

"RANAWAY my negro man RICHARD. A reward of $25 will be paid for his

apprehension DEAD or ALIVE. Satisfactory proof will only be required

of his being KILLED. He has with him, in all probability, his wife

ELIZA, who ran away from Col. Thompson, now a resident of Alabama,

about the time he commenced his journey to that state. DURANT H.

RHODES."

In the "Mason (Georgia) Telegraph," May 28, is the following:

"About the 1st of March last the negro man RANSOM left me without the

least provocation whatever; I will give a reward of twenty dollars for

said negro, if taken DEAD OR ALIVE,--and if killed in any attempt, an

advance of five dollars will be paid. BRYANT JOHNSON.

"_Crawford co. Georgia_"

See the "Newbern (N.C.) Spectator," Jan. 5, 1838, for the

following:--

"RANAWAY, from the subscriber, a negro man named SAMPSON. Fifty

dollars reward will be given for the delivery of him to me, or his

confinement in any jail so that I get him, and should he resist in

being taken, so that violence is necessary to arrest him, I will not

hold any person liable for damages should the slave be KILLED. ENOCH

FOY.

"Jones County, N.C."

From the "Macon (Ga.) Messenger," June 14, 1838.

"TO THE OWNERS OF RUNAWAY NEGROES. A large mulatto Negro man, between

thirty-five and forty years old, about six feet in height, having a

high forehead, and hair slightly grey, was KILLED, near my plantation,

on the 9th inst. _He would not surrender_ but assaulted Mr. Bowen, who

killed him in self-defence. If the owner desires further information

relative to the death of his negro, he can obtain it by letter, or by

calling on the subscriber ten miles south of Perry, Houston county.

EDM'D. JAS. McGEHEE."

From the 'Charleston (S.C.) Courier,' Feb. 20, 1836.

"$300 REWARD. Ranaway from the subscriber, in November last, his two

negro men, named Billy and Pompey.

"Billy is 25 years old, and is known as the patroon of my boat for

many years; in all probability he may resist; in that event 50 dollars

will be paid for his HEAD."

From the 'Newbern (N.C.) Spectator,' Dec 2. 1836.

"$200 REWARD. Ranaway from the subscriber, about three years ago, a

certain negro man named Ben, commonly known by the name of Ben Fox. He

had but one eye. Also, one other negro, by the name of Rigdon, who

ranaway on the 8th of this month.

"I will give the reward of one hundred dollars for each of the above

negroes, to be delivered to me or confined in the jail of Lenoir or

Jones county, or FOR THE KILLING OF THEM, SO THAT I CAN SEE THEM. W.D.

COBB."

In the same number of the Spectator two Justices of the Peace

advertise the same runaways, and give notice that if they do not

immediately return to W.D. Cobb, their master, they will be considered

as outlaws, and any body may kill them. The following is an extract

from the proclamation of the JUSTICES.

"And we do hereby, by virtue of an act of the assembly of this state,

concerning servants and slaves, intimate and declare, if the said

slaves do not surrender themselves and return home to their master

immediately after the publication of these presents, _that any person

may kill and destroy said slaves by such means as he or they think

fit, without accusation or impeachment of any crime or offence for so

doing, or without incurring any penalty or forfeiture thereby._

"Given under our hands and seals, this 12th November, 1836.

"B. COLEMAN, J.P. [Seal.]

"JAS. JONES, J.P. [Seal.]"

On the 28th, of April 1836, in the city of St Louis, Missouri, a black

man, named McIntosh who had stabbed an officer, that had arrested him,

was seized by the multitude, fastened to a tree _in the midst of the

city_, wood piled around him, and in open day and in the presence of

an immense throng of citizens, he was burned to death. The Alton

(Ill.) Telegraph, in its account of the scene says;

"All was silent as death while the executioners were piling wood

around their victim. He said not a word, until feeling that the flames

had seized upon him. He then uttered an awful howl, attempting to sing

and pray, then hung his head, and suffered in silence, except in the

following instance:--After the flames had surrounded their prey, his

eyes burnt out of his head, and his mouth seemingly parched to a

cinder, some one in the crowd, more compassionate than the rest,

proposed to put an end to his misery by shooting him, when it was

replied, 'that would be of no use, since he was already out of pain.'

'No, no,' said the wretch, 'I am not, I am suffering as much as ever;

shoot me, shoot me.' 'No, no,' said one of the fiends who was standing

about the sacrifice they were roasting, 'he shall not be shot. _I

would sooner slacken the fire, if that would increase his misery_;'

and the man who said this was, as we understand, an OFFICER OF

JUSTICE!"

The St. Louis correspondent of a New York paper adds,

"The shrieks and groans of the victim were loud and piercing, and to

observe one limb after another drop into the fire was awful indeed. He

was about fifteen minutes in dying. I visited the place this morning,

and saw his body, or the remains of it, at the place of execution. He

was burnt to a crump. His legs and arms were gone, and only a part of

his head and body were left."

Lest this demonstration of 'public opinion' should be regarded as a

sudden impulse merely, not an index of the settled tone of feeling in

that community, it is important to add, that the Hon. Luke E. Lawless,

Judge of the Circuit Court of Missouri, at a session of that Court in

the city of St. Louis, some months after the burning of this man,

decided officially that since the burning of McIntosh was the act,

either directly or by countenance of a _majority_ of the citizens, it

is 'a case which transcends the jurisdiction,' of the Grand Jury! Thus

the state of Missouri has proclaimed to the world, that the wretches

who perpetrated that unspeakably diabolical murder, and the thousands

that stood by consenting to it, were _her representatives_, and the

Bench sanctifies it with the solemnity of a judicial decision.

The 'New Orleans Post,' of June 7, 1836, publishes the following;

"We understand, that a negro man was lately condemned, by the mob, to

be BURNED OVER A SLOW FIRE, which was put into execution at Grand

Gulf, Mississippi, for murdering a black woman, and her master."

Mr. HENRY BRADLEY, of Pennyan, N.Y., has furnished us with an extract

of a letter written by a gentleman in Mississippi to his brother in

that village, detailing the particulars of the preceding transaction.

The letter is dated Grand Gulf, Miss. August 15, 1836. The extract is

as follows:

"I left Vicksburg and came to Grand Gulf. This is a fine place

immediately on the banks of the Mississippi, of something like fifteen

hundred inhabitants in the winter, and at this time, I suppose, there

are not over two hundred white inhabitants, but in the town and its

vicinity there are negroes by thousands. The day I arrived at this

place there was a man by the name of G---- murdered by a negro man

that belonged to him. G---- was born and brought up in A----, state of

New York. His father and mother now live south of A----. He has left a

property here, it is supposed, of forty thousand dollars, and no

family.

"They took the negro, mounted him on a horse, led the horse under a

tree, put a rope around his neck, raised him up by throwing the rope

over a limb; they then got into a quarrel among themselves; some swore

that he should be burnt alive; the rope was cut and the negro dropped

to the ground. He immediately jumped to his feet; they then made him

walk a short distance to a tree; he was then tied fast and a fire

kindled, when another quarrel took place; the fire was pulled away

from him when about half dead, and a committee of twelve appointed to

say in what manner he should be disposed of. They brought in that he

should then be cut down, his head cut off, his body burned, and his

head stuck on a pole at the corner of the road in the edge of the

town. That was done and all parties satisfied!

"G---- _owned the negro's wife, and was in the habit of sleeping with

her!_ The negro said he had killed him, and he believed he should be

rewarded in heaven for it.

"This is but one instance among many of a similar nature.

S.S."

We have received a more detailed account of this transaction from Mr.

William Armstrong, of Putnam, Ohio, through Maj. Horace Nye, of that

place. Mr. A. who has been for some years employed as captain and

supercargo of boats descending the river, was at Grand Gulf at the

time of the tragedy, and _witnessed_ it. It was on the Sabbath.

From Mr. Armstrong's statement, it appears that the slave was

a man of uncommon intelligence; had the over-sight of a large

business--superintended the purchase of supplies for his master,

&c.--that exasperated by the intercourse of his master with his wife,

he was upbraiding her one evening, when his master overhearing him,

went out to quell him, was attacked by the infuriated man and killed

on the spot. The name of the master was Green; he was a native of

Auburn, New York, and had been at the south but a few years.

Mr. EZEKIEL BIRDSEYE, of Cornwall, Conn., a gentleman well known and

highly respected in Litchfield county, who resided a number of years

in South Carolina, gives the following testimony:--

"A man by the name of Waters was killed by his slaves, in Newberry

District. Three of them were tried before the court, and ordered to be

burnt. I was but a few miles distant at the time, and conversed with

those who saw the execution. The slaves were tied to a stake, and

pitch pine wood piled around them, to which the fire was communicated.

Thousands were collected to witness this barbarous transaction. _Other

executions of this kind took place in various parts of the state,

during my residence in it, from 1818 to 1824_. About three or four

years ago, a young negro was burnt in Abbeville District, for an

attempt at rape."

In the fall of 1837, there was a rumor of a projected insurrection on

the Red River, in Louisiana. The citizens forthwith seized and hanged

NINE SLAVES, AND THREE FREE COLORED MEN, WITHOUT TRIAL. A few months

previous to that transaction, a slave was seized in a similar manner

and publicly burned to death, in Arkansas. In July, 1835, the citizens

of Madison county, Mississippi, were alarmed by rumors of an

insurrection arrested five slaves and publicly executed them without

trial.

The Missouri Republican, April 30, 1838, gives the particulars of the

deliberate murder of a negro man named Tom, a cook on board the

steamboat Pawnee, on her passage up from New Orleans to St. Louis.

Some of the facts stated by the Republican are the following:

"On Friday night, about 10 o'clock, a deaf and dumb German girl was

found in the storeroom with Tom. The door was locked, and at first Tom

denied she was there. The girl's father came. Tom unlocked the door,

and the girl was found secreted in the room behind a barrel. The next

morning some four or five of the deck passengers spoke to the captain

about it. This was about breakfast time. Immediately after he left the

deck, a number of the deck passengers rushed upon the negro, bound his

arms behind his back and carried him forward to the bow of the boat. A

voice cried out 'throw him overboard,' and was responded to from every

quarter of the deck--and in an instant he was plunged into the river.

The whole scene of tying him and throwing him overboard scarcely

occupied _ten minutes_, and was so precipitate that the officers were

unable to interfere in time to save him.

"There were between two hundred and fifty and three hundred passengers

on board."

The whole process of seizing Tom, dragging him upon deck, binding his

arms behind his back, forcing him to the bow of the boat, and throwing

him overboard, occupied, the editor informs us, about TEN MINUTES, and

of the two hundred and fifty or three hundred deck passengers, with

perhaps as many cabin passengers, it does not appear that _a single

individual raised a finger to prevent this deliberate murder_; and the

cry "throw him overboard," was it seems, "responded to from every

quarter of the deck!"

Rev. JAMES A. THOME, of Augusta, Ky., son of Arthur Thome, Esq., till

recently a slaveholder, published five years since the following

description of a scene witnessed by him in New Orleans:

"In December of 1833, I landed at New Orleans, in the steamer W----.

It was after night, dark and rainy. The passengers were called out of

the cabin, from the enjoyment of a fire, which the cold, damp

atmosphere rendered very comfortable, by a sudden shout of, 'catch

him--catch him--catch the negro.' The cry was answered by a hundred

voices--'Catch him--_kill_ him,' and a rush from every direction

toward our boat, indicated that the object of pursuit was near. The

next moment we heard a man plunge into the river, a few paces above

us. A crowd gathered upon the shore, with lamps and stones, and clubs,

still crying, 'catch him--kill him--catch him--shoot him.'

"I soon discovered the poor man. He had taken refuge under the prow of

another boat, and was standing in the water up to his waist. The

angry vociferation of his pursuers, did not intimidate him. He defied

them all. 'Don't you _dare_ to come near me, or I will sink you in the

river.' He was armed with despair. For a moment the mob was palsied by

the energy of his threatenings. They were afraid to go to him with a

skiff, but a number of them went on to the boat and tried to seize

him. They threw a noose rope down repeatedly, _that they might pull

him up by the neck_! but he planted his hand firmly against the boat

and dashed the rope away with his arms. One of them took a long bar of

wood, and leaning over the prow, endeavored to strike him on the head,

The blow must have shattered the skull, but it did not reach low

enough. The monster raised up the heavy club again and said, 'Come out

now, you old rascal, or die.' 'Strike,' said the negro;

'strike--shiver my brains _now_; I want to die;' and down went the

club again, without striking. This was repeated several times. The

mob, seeing their efforts fruitless, became more enraged and

threatened to stone him, if he did not surrender himself into their

hands. He again defied them, and declared that he would drown himself

in the river, before they should have him. They then resorted to

persuasion, and promised they would not hurt him. 'I'll die first;'

was his only reply. Even the furious mob was awed, and for a while

stood dumb.

"After standing in the cold water for an hour, the miserable being

began to fail. We observed him gradually sinking--his voice grew weak

and tremulous--yet he continued to _curse_! In the midst of his oaths

he uttered broken sentences--'I did'nt steal the meat--I did'nt

steal--my master lives--master--master lives up the river--(his voice

began to gurgle in his throat, and he was so chilled that his teeth

chattered audibly)--I did'nt--steal--I did'nt steal--my--my

master--my--I want to see my master--I didn't--no--my mas--you

want--you want to kill me--I didn't steal the'--His last words could

just be heard as be sunk under the water.

"During this indescribable scene, _not one of the hundred that stood

around made any effort to save the man until he was apparently

drowned_. He was then dragged out and stretched on the bow of the

boat, and soon sufficient means were used for his recovery. The brutal

captain ordered him to be taken off his boat--declaring, with an oath,

that he would throw him into the river again, if he was not

immediately removed. I withdrew, sick and horrified with this

appalling exhibition of wickedness.

"Upon inquiry, I learned that the colored man lived some fifty miles

up the Mississippi; that he had been charged with stealing some

article from the wharf; was fired upon with a pistol, and pursued by

the mob.

"In reflecting upon this unmingled cruelty--this insensibility to

suffering and disregard of life--I exclaimed,

'Is there no flesh in man's obdurate heart?'

"One poor man, chased like a wolf by a hundred blood hounds, yelling,

howling, and gnashing their teeth upon him--plunges into the cold

river to seek protection! A crowd of spectators witness the scene,

with all the composure with which a Roman populace would look upon a

gladiatorial show. Not a voice heard in the sufferer's behalf. At

length the powers of nature give way; the blood flows back to the

heart--the teeth chatter--the voice trembles and dies, while the

victim drops down into his grave.

"What an atrocious system is that which leaves two millions of souls,

friendless and powerless--hunted and chased--afflicted and tortured

and driven to death, without the means of redress.--Yet such is the

system of slavery."

The 'public opinion' of slaveholders is illustrated by scores of

announcements in southern papers, like the following, from the

Raleigh, (N.C.) Register, August 20, 1838. Joseph Gale and Son,

editors and proprietors--the father and brother of the editor of the

National Intelligence, Washington city, D.C.

"On Saturday night, Mr. George Holmes, of this county, and some of his

friends, were in pursuit of a runaway slave (the property of Mr.

Holmes) and fell in with him in attempting to make his escape. Mr. H.

discharged a gun at his legs, for the purpose of disabling him; but

unfortunately, the slave stumbled, and the shot struck him near the

small of the back, of which wound he died in a short time. The slave

continued to run some distance after he was shot, until overtaken by

one of the party. We are satisfied, from all that we can learn, that

Mr. H. had no intention of inflicting a mortal wound."

Oh! the _gentleman_, it seems, only shot at his legs, merely to

'disable'--and it must be expected that every _gentleman_ will amuse

himself in shooting at his own property whenever the notion takes him,

and if he should happen to hit a little higher and go through the

small of the back instead of the legs, why every body says it is

'unfortunate,' and the whole of the editorial corps, instead of

branding him as a barbarous wretch for shooting at his slave, whatever

part be aimed at, join with the oldest editor in North Carolina, in

complacently exonerating Mr. Holmes by saying, "We are satisfied that

Mr. H. had no intention of inflicting a mortal wound." And so 'public

opinion' wraps it up!

The Franklin (La.) Republican, August 19, 1837, has the following:

"NEGROES TAKEN.--Four gentlemen of this vicinity, went out yesterday

for the purpose of finding the camp of some noted runaways, supposed

to be near this place; the camp was discovered about 11 o'clock, the

negroes four in number, three men and one woman, finding they were

discovered, tried to make their escape through the cane; two of them

were fired on, one of which made his escape; the other one fell after

running a short distance, his wounds are not supposed to be dangerous;

the other man was taken without any hurt; the woman also made her

escape."

Thus terminated the mornings amusement of the '_four gentlemen_,'

whose exploits are so complacently chronicled by the editor of the

Franklin Republican. The three men and one woman were all fired upon,

it seems, though only one of them was shot down. The half famished

runaways made not the least resistance, they merely rushed in panic

among the canes, at the sight of their pursuers, and the bullets

whistled after them and brought to the ground one poor fellow, who was

carried back by his captors as a trophy of the 'public opinion' among

slaveholders.

In the Macon (Ga.) Telegraph, Nov. 27, 1838, we find the following

account of a runaway's den, and of the good luck of a 'Mr. Adams,' in

running down one of them 'with his excellent dogs:'

"A runaway's den was discovered on Sunday near the Washington Spring,

in a little patch of woods, where it had been for several months, so

artfully concealed under ground, that it was detected only by

accident, though in sight of two or three houses, and near the road

and fields where there has been constant daily passing. The entrance

was concealed by a pile of pine straw, representing a hog bed--which

being removed, discovered a trap door and steps that led to a room

about six feet square, comfortably ceiled with plank, containing a

small fire-place the flue of which was ingeniously conducted above

ground and concealed by the straw. The inmates took the alarm and made

their escape; but Mr. Adams and his excellent dogs being put upon the

trail, soon run down and secured one of them, which proved to be a

negro fellow who had been out about a year. He stated that the other

occupant was a woman, who had been a runaway a still longer time. In

the den was found a quantity of meal, bacon, corn, potatoes, &c., and

various cooking utensils and wearing apparel."

Yes, Mr. Adams' 'EXCELLENT DOGS' did the work! They were well trained,

swift, fresh, keen-scented, 'excellent' men-hunters, and though the

poor fugitive in his frenzied rush for liberty, strained every muscle,

yet they gained upon him, and after dashing through fens, brier-beds,

and the tangled undergrowth till faint and torn, he sinks, and the

blood-hounds are upon him. What blood-vessels the poor struggler burst

in his desperate push for life--how much he was bruised and lacerated

in his plunge through the forest, or how much the dogs tore him, the

Macon editor has not chronicled--they are matters of no moment--but

his heart is touched with the merits of Mr. Adams' 'EXCELLENT DOGS,'

that 'soon _run down_ and _secured_' a guiltless and trembling human

creature!

The Georgia Constitutionalist, of Jan. 1837, contains the following

letter from the coroner of Barnwell District, South Carolina, dated

Aiken, S.C. Dec. 20, 1836.

"_To the Editor of the Constitutionalist:_

"I have just returned from an inquest I held over the body of a negro

man, a runaway, that was shot near the South Edisto, in this District,

(Barnwell,) on Saturday last. He came to his death by his own

recklessness. He refused to be taken alive--and said that other

attempts to take him had been made, and he was determined that he

would not be taken. He was at first, (when those in pursuit of him

found it absolutely necessary,) shot at with small shot, with the

intention of merely crippling him. He was shot at several times, and

at last he was so disabled as to be compelled to surrender. He kept in

the run of a creek in a very dense swamp all the time that the

neighbors were in pursuit of him. As soon as the negro was taken, the

best medical aid was procured, but he died on the same evening. One of

the witnesses at the Inquisition, stated that the negro boy said he

was from Mississippi, and belonged to so many persons, that he did not

know who his master was, but again he said his master's name was

Brown. He said his name was Sam, and when asked by another witness,

who his master was, he muttered something like Augusta or Augustine.

The boy was apparently above thirty-five or forty years of age, about

six feet high, slightly yellow in the face, very long beard or

whiskers, and very stout built, and a stern countenance; and appeared

to have been a runaway for a long time.

WILLIAM H. PRITCHARD,

_Coroner (Ex-officio,) Barnwell Dist. S.C._"

The Norfolk (Va.) Herald, of Feb. 1837, has the following:

"Three negroes in a ship's yawl, came on shore yesterday evening, near

New Point Comfort, and were soon after apprehended and lodged in jail.

Their story is, that they belonged to a brig from New York bound to

Havana, which was cast away to the southward of Cape Henry, some day

last week; that the brig was called the Maria, Captain Whittemore. I

have no doubt they are deserters from some vessel in the bay, as their

statements are very confused and inconsistent. One of these fellows is

a mulatto, and calls himself Isaac Turner; the other two are quite

black, the one passing by the name of James Jones and the other John

Murray. They have all their clothing with them, and are dressed in

sea-faring apparel. They attempted to make their escape, and _it was

not till a musket was fired at them, and one of them slightly

wounded_, that they surrendered. They will be kept in jail till

something further is discovered respecting them."

The 'St. Francisville (La.) Chronicle,' of Feb. 1, 1839. Gives the

following account of a 'negro hunt,' in that Parish.

"Two or three days since a gentleman of this parish, in _hunting

runaway negroes_, came upon a camp of them in the swamp on Cat Island.

He succeeded in arresting two of them, but the third made fight; and

upon _being shot in the shoulder_, fled to a sluice, where the _dogs

succeeded_ in drowning him before assistance could arrive."

"'The dogs _succeeded_ in drowning him'! Poor fellow! He tried hard for

his life, plunged into the sluice, and, with a bullet in his shoulder,

and the blood hounds unfleshing his bones, he bore up for a moment

with feeble stroke as best he might, but 'public opinion,'

'_succeeded_ in drowning him,' and the same 'public opinion,' calls

the man who fired and crippled him, and cheered on the dogs, 'a

gentleman,' and the editor who celebrates the exploit is a 'gentleman'

also!"

A large number of extracts similar to the above, might here be

inserted from Southern newspapers in our possession, but the foregoing

are more than sufficient for our purpose, and we bring to a close the

testimony on this point, with the following. Extract of a letter, from

the Rev. Samuel J. May, of South Scituate, Mass. dated Dec. 20, 1838.

"You doubtless recollect the narrative given in the Oasis, of a slave

in Georgia, who having ranaway from his master, (accounted a very

hospitable and even humane gentleman,) was hunted by his master and

his retainers with horses, dogs, and rifles, and having been driven

into a tree by the hounds, was shot down by his more cruel pursuers.

All the facts there given, and some others equally shocking, connected

with the same case, were first communicated to me in 1833, by Mr. W.

Russell, a highly respectable teacher of youth in Boston. He is

doubtless ready to vouch for them. The same gentleman informed me that

he was keeping school on or near the plantation of the monster who

perpetrated the above outrage upon humanity, that he was even invited

by him to join in the hunt, and when he expressed abhorrence at the

thought, the planter holding up the rifle which he had in his hand

said with an oath, 'damn that rascal, this is the third time he has

runaway, and he shall never run again. I'd rather put a ball into his

side, than into the best buck in the land.'"

Mr. Russell, in the account given by him of this tragedy in the

'Oasis,' page 267, thus describes the slaveholder who made the above

expression, and was the leader of the 'hunt,' and in whose family he

resided at the time as an instructor he says of him--he was "an

opulent planter, in whose family the evils of slaveholding were

palliated by every expedient that a humane and generous disposition

could suggest. He was a man of noble and elevated character, and

distinguished for his generosity, and kindness of heart."

In a letter to Mr. May, dated Feb. 3, 1839, Mr. Russell, speaking of

the hunting of runaways with dogs and guns, says: "Occurrences of a

nature similar to the one related in the 'Oasis,' were not unfrequent

in the interior of Georgia and South Carolina twenty years ago.

_Several_ such fell under my notice within the space of fifteen

months. In two such 'hunts,' I was solicited to join."

The following was written by a sister-in-law of Gerrit Smith, Esq.,

Peterboro. She is married to the son of a North Carolinian.

"In North Carolina, some years ago, several slaves were arrested for

committing serious crimes and depredations, in the neighborhood of

Wilmington, among other things, burning houses, and, in one or more

instances, murder.

"It happened that the wife of one of these slaves resided in one of

the most respectable families in W. in the capacity of nurse. Mr. J.

_the first lawyer in the place_, came into the room, where the lady of

the house, was sitting, with the nurse, who held a child in her arms,

and, addressing the nurse, said, Hannah! would you know your husband

if you should see him?--Oh, yes, sir, she replied--When HE DREW FROM

BENEATH HIS CLOAK THE HEAD OF THE SLAVE, at the sight of which the

poor woman immediately fainted. The heads of the others were placed

upon poles, in some part of the town, afterwards known as 'Negro Head

Point.'"

We have just received the above testimony, enclosed in a letter from

Mr. Smith, in which he says, "that the fact stated by my

sister-in-law, actually occurred, there can be no doubt."

The following extract from the Diary of the Rev. ELIAS CORNELIUS, we

insert here, having neglected to do it under a preceding head, to

which it more appropriately belongs.

"New Orleans, Sabbath, February 15, 1818. Early this morning

accompanied A.H. Esq. to the _hospital_, with the view of making

arrangements to preach to such of the sick as could understand

English. The first room we entered presented a scene of human misery,

such as I had never before witnessed. A poor negro man was lying upon

a couch, apparently in great distress; a more miserable object can

hardly be conceived. His face was much _disfigured_, an IRON COLLAR,

TWO INCHES WIDE AND HALF AN INCH THICK, WAS CLASPED ABOUT HIS NECK,

while one of his feet and part of the leg were in a state of

putrefaction. We inquired the cause of his being in this distressing

condition, and he answered us in a faltering voice, that he was

willing to tell us all the truth.

"He belonged to Mr. ---- a Frenchman, ran-away, was caught, and

punished with one hundred lashes! This happened about Christmas; and

during the cold weather at that time, he was confined in the

_Cane-house, with a scanty portion of clothing, and without fire_. In

this situation his foot had frozen, and mortified, and having been

removed from place to place, he was yesterday brought here by order of

his new master, who was an American. I had no time to protract my

conversation with him then, but resolved to return in a few hours and

pray with him.

"Having returned home, I again visited the hospital at half past

eleven o'clock, and concluded first of all [he was to preach at 12,]

to pray with the poor lacerated negro. I entered the apartment in

which he lay, and observed an old man sitting upon a couch; but,

without saying anything went up to the bed-side of the negro, who

appeared to be asleep. I spoke to him, but he gave no answer. I spoke

again, and moved his head, still he said nothing. My apprehensions

were immediately excited, and I felt for his pulse, but it was gone.

Said I to the old man, 'surely this negro is dead.' 'No,' he answered,

'he has fallen asleep, for he had a very restless season last night.'

I again examined and called the old gentleman to the bed, and alas, it

was found true, that he was dead. Not an eye had witnessed his last

struggle, and I was the first, as it should happen, to discover the

fact. I called several men into the room, and without ceremony they

wrapped him in a sheet, and carried him to the _dead-house_ as it is

called."--Edwards' Life of Rev. Elias Cornelius, pp. 101, 2, 3.

THE PROTECTION EXTENDED BY 'PUBLIC OPINION,' TO THE HEALTH[38] OF THE

SLAVES.

This may be judged of from the fact that it is perfectly notorious

among slaveholders, both North and South, that of the tens of

thousands of slaves sold annually in the northern slave states to be

transported to the south, large numbers of them die under the severe,

process of acclimation, _all_ suffer more or less, and multitudes

_much_, in their health and strength, during their first years in the

far south and south west. That such is the case is sufficiently proved

by the care taken by all who advertise for sale or hire in Louisiana,

Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, &c. to inform the reader, that their

slaves are 'Creoles,' 'southern born,' 'country born,' &c. or if they

are from the north, that they are 'acclimated,' and the importance

attached to their _acclimation_, is shown in the fact, that it is

generally distinguished from the rest of the advertisements either by

_italics_ or CAPITALS. Almost every newspaper published in the states

far south contains advertisements like the following.

[Footnote 38: See pp. 37-39.]

From the "Vicksburg (Mi.) Register," Dec. 27, 1838.

"I OFFER my plantation for sale. Also seventy-five _acclimated

Negroes_. O.B. COBB."

From the "Southerner," June 7, 1837.

"I WILL sell my Old-River plantation near Columbia in Arkansas;--also

ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY ACCLIMATED SLAVES.

BENJ. HUGHES."

_Port Gibson, Jan. 14, 1837._

From the "Planters' (La.) Intelligencer," March 22.

"Probate sale--Will be offered for sale at Public Auction, to the

highest bidder, ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY _acclimated_ slaves."

G.W. KEETON.

Judge of the Parish of Concordia"

From the "Arkansas Advocate," May 22, 1837.

"By virtue of a Deed of Trust, executed to me, I will sell at public

auction at Fisher's Prairie, Arkansas, sixty LIKELY NEGROES,

consisting of Men, Women, Boys and Girls, the most of whom are WELL

ACCLIMATED.

GRANDISON D. ROYSTON, _Trustee_."

From the "New Orleans Bee," Feb. 9, 1838.

"VALUABLE ACCLIMATED NEGROES"

"Will be sold on Saturday, 10th inst. at 12 o'clock, at the city

exchange, St. Louis street."

Then follows a description of the slaves, closing with the same

assertion, which forms the caption of the advertisement "ALL

ACCLIMATED."

General Felix Houston, of Natchez, advertises in the "Natchez

Courier," April 6, 1838, "Thirty five very fine _acclimated_ Negroes."

Without inserting more advertisements, suffice it to say, that when

slaves are advertised for sale or hire, in the lower southern country,

if they are _natives_, or have lived in that region long enough to

become acclimated, it is _invariably_ stated.

But we are not left to _conjecture_ the amount of suffering

experienced by slaves from the north in undergoing the severe process

of 'seasoning' to the climate, or '_acclimation_' A writer in the New

Orleans Argus, September, 1830, in an article on the culture of the

sugar cane, says; 'The loss by _death_ in bringing slaves from a

northern climate, which our planters are under the necessity of doing,

is not less than TWENTY-FIVE PER CENT.'

Nothwithstanding the immense amount of suffering endured in the

process of acclimation, and the fearful waste of life, and the

_notoriety_ of this fact, still the 'public opinion' of Virginia,

Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, Missouri, &c. annually DRIVES to the far

south, thousands of their slaves to undergo these sufferings, and the

'public opinion,' of the far south buys them, and forces the helpless

victims to endure them.

THE 'PROTECTION' VOUCHSAFED BY 'PUBLIC OPINION,' TO LIBERTY.

This is shown by hundreds of advertisements in southern papers, like

the following:

From the "Mobile Register," July 21. 1837. "WILL BE SOLD CHEAP FOR

CASH, in front of the Court House of Mobile County, on the 22d day of

July next, one mulatto man named HENRY HALL, WHO SAYS HE IS FREE; his

owner or owners, _if any_, having failed to demand him, he is to be

sold according to the statute in such cases made and provided, _to pay

Jail fees._

WM. MAGEE, Sh'ff M.C."

From the "Grand Gulf (Miss.) Advertiser," Dec. 7, 1838.

"COMMITTED to the jail of Chickasaw Co. Edmund, Martha, John and

Louisa; the man 50, the woman 35, John 3 years old, and Louisa 14

months. They say they are FREE and were decoyed to this state."

The "Southern Argus," of July 25, 1837, contains the following.

"RANAWAY from my plantation, a negro boy named William. Said boy was

taken up by Thomas Walton, and says _he was free_, and that his

parents live near Shawneetown, Illinois, and that he was _taken_ from

that place in July 1836; says his father's name is William, and his

mother's Sally Brown, and that they moved from Fredericksburg,

Virginia. I will give twenty dollars to any person who will deliver

said boy to me or Col. Byrn, Columbus. SAMUEL H. BYRN"

The first of the following advertisements was a standing one, in the

"Vicksburg Register," from Dec. 1835 till Aug. 1836. The second

advertises the same FREE man for sale.

"SHERIFF'S SALE" "COMMITTED, to the jail of Warren county, as a

Runaway, on the 23d inst. a Negro man, who calls himself John J.

Robinson; _says that he is free_, says that he kept a baker's shop in

Columbus, Miss. and that he peddled through the Chickasaw nation to

Pontotoc, and came to Memphis, where he sold his horse, took water,

and came to this place. The owner of said boy is requested to come

forward, prove property, pay charges, and take him away, or he will be

dealt with as the law directs.

WM. EVERETT, Jailer.

Dec. 24, 1835"

"NOTICE is hereby given, that the above described boy, who calls

himself John J. Robinson, having been confined in the Jail of Warren

county as a Runaway, for six months--and having been regularly

advertised during this period, I shall proceed to sell said Negro boy

at public auction, to the highest bidder for cash, at the door of the

Court House in Vicksburg, on Monday, 1st day of August, 1836, in

pursuance of the statute in such cases made and provided.

E. W. MORRIS, Sheriff.

_Vicksburg, July 2, 1836._"

See "Newborn (N.C.) Spectator," of Jan. 5, 1838, for the following

advertisement.

"RANAWAY, from the subscriber a negro man known as Frank Pilot. He is

five feet eight inches high, dark complexion, and about 50 years old,

_HAS BEEN FREE SINCE_ 1829--is now my property, as heir at law of his

last owner, _Samuel Ralston_, dec. I will give the above reward if he

is taken and confined in any jail so that I can get him.

SAMUEL RALSTON. Pactolus, Pitt County."

From the Tuscaloosa (Ala.) "Flag of the Union," June 7.

"COMMITTED to the jail of Tuscaloosa county, a negro man, who says his

name is Robert Winfield, and _says he is free_.

R.W. BARBER, _Jailer_."

That "public opinion," in the slave states affords no protection to

the liberty of colored persons, even after those persons become

legally free, by the operation of their own laws, is declared by

Governor Comegys, of Delaware, in his recent address to the

Legislature of that state, Jan. 1839. The Governor, commenting upon

the law of the state which provides that persons convicted of certain

crimes shall be sold as servants for a limited time, says,

"_The case is widely different with the negro(!)_ Although ordered to

be disposed of as a servant for a term of years, _perpetual slavery in

the south is his inevitable doom_; unless, peradventure, age or

disease may have rendered him worthless, or some resident of the

State, from motives of _benevolence_, will pay for him three or four

times his intrinsic _value_. It matters not for how short a time he is

ordered to be sold, so that he can be carried from the State. Once

beyond its limits, _all chance of restored freedom is gone_--for he is

removed far from the reach of any testimony to aid him in an effort to

be released from bondage, when his _legal_ term of servitude has

expired. _Of the many colored convicts sold out of the State, it is

believed none ever return_. Of course they are purchased _with the

express view to their transportation for life_, and bring such

enormous prices as to prevent all _competition_ on the part of those

of our citizens who _require_ their services, and _would keep them in

the State_."

From the "Memphis (Ten.) Enquirer," Dec. 28, 1838.

"$50 REWARD. Ranaway, from the subscriber, on Thursday last, a negro

man named Isaac, 22 years old, about 5 feet 10 or 11 inches high, dark

complexion, well made, full face, speaks quick, and very correctly for

a negro. _He was originally from New-York_, and no doubt will attempt

to pass himself as free. I will give the above reward for his

apprehension and delivery, or confinement, so that I obtain him, if

taken out of the state, or $30 if taken within the state.

JNO. SIMPSON. _Memphis, Dec. 28._"

Mark, with what shameless hardihood this JNO. SIMPSON, tells the

public that _he knew_ Isaac Wright was a free man! 'HE WAS ORIGINALLY

FROM NEW YORK,' he tells us. And yet he adds with brazen effrontery,

'_he will attempt to pass himself as free._' This Isaac Wright, was

shipped by a man named Lewis, of New Bedford, Massachusetts, and sold

as a slave in New Orleans. After passing through several hands, and

being flogged nearly to death, he made his escape, and five days ago,

(March 5,) returned to his friends in Philadelphia.

From the "Baltimore Sun," Dec. 23, 1838.

"FREE NEGROES--Merry Ewall, a FREE NEGRO, from Virginia, was committed

to jail, at Snow Hill, Md. last week, for remaining in the State

longer than is allowed by the law of 1831. The fine in his case

amounts to $225. Capril Purnell, a negro from Delaware, is now in jail

in the same place, for a violation of the same act. His fine amounts

to FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS, and he WILL BE SOLD IN A SHORT TIME."

The following is the decision of the Supreme Court, of Louisiana, in

the case of Gomez _vs_. Bonneval, Martin's La. Reports, 656, and

Wheeler's "Law of Slavery," p. 380-1.

_Marginal remark of the Compiler.--"A slave does not become free on

his being illegally imported into the state."_

"_Per Cur. Derbigny_, J. The petitioner is a negro in actual state of

slavery; he claims his freedom, and is bound to prove it. In his

attempt, however, to show that he was free before he was introduced

into this country, he has failed, so that his claim rests entirely on

the laws prohibiting the introduction of slaves in the United States.

That the plaintiff was imported since that prohibition does exist is a

fact sufficiently established by the evidence. What right he has

acquired under the laws forbidding such importation is the only

question which we have to examine. Formerly, while the act dividing

Louisiana into two territories was in force in this country, slaves

introduced here in contravention to it, were freed by operation of

law; but that act was merged in the legislative provisions which were

subsequently enacted on the subject of importation of slaves into the

United States generally. Under the now existing laws, the individuals

thus imported acquire _no personal right_, they are mere passive

beings, who are disposed of _according to the will_ of the different

state legislatures. In this country they are to _remain slaves_, and

TO BE SOLD FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE STATE. The plaintiff, therefore, has

nothing to claim as a freeman; and as to a mere change of master,

should such be his wish, _he cannot be listened to in a court of

justice_."

Extract from a speech of Mr. Thomson of Penn. in Congress, March 1,

1826, on the prisons in the District of Columbia.

"I visited the prisons twice that I might myself ascertain the truth.

* * In one of these cells (but eight feet square,) were confined at

that time, seven persons, three women and four children. The children

were confined under a strange system of law in this District, by which

a colored person who _alleges_ HE IS FREE, and appeals to the

tribunals of the country, to have the matter tried, is COMMITTED TO

PRISON, till the decision takes place. They were almost naked--one of

them was sick, lying on the damp brick floor, _without bed, pillow, or

covering_. In this abominable cell, seven human beings were confined

day by day, and night after night, without a bed, chair, or stool, or

any other of the most common necessaries of life."--_Gales'

Congressional Debates_, v.2, p. 1480.

The following facts serve to show, that the present generation of

slaveholders do but follow in the footsteps of their fathers, in their

zeal for LIBERTY.

Extract from a document submitted by the Committee of the yearly

meeting of Friends in Philadelphia, to the Committee of Congress, to

whom was referred the memorial of the people called Quakers, in 1797.

"In the latter part of the year 1776, several of the people called

Quakers, residing in the counties of Perquimans and Pasquotank, in the

state of North Carolina, liberated their negroes, as it was then clear

there was no existing law to prevent their so doing; for the law of

1741 could not at that time be carried into effect; and they were

suffered to remain free, until a law passed, in the spring of 1777,

under which they were taken up and sold, contrary to the Bill of

Rights, recognized in the constitution of that state, as a part

thereof, and to which it was annexed.

"In the spring of 1777, when the General Assembly met for the first

time, a law was enacted to prevent slaves from being emancipated,

except for meritorious services, &c. to be judged of by the county

courts or the general assembly; and ordering, that if any should be

manumitted in any other way, they be taken up, and the county courts

within whose jurisdictions they are apprehended should order them to

be sold. Under this law the county courts of Perquimans and

Pasquotank, in the year 1777, ordered A LARGE NUMBER OF PERSONS TO BE

SOLD, WHO WERE FREE AT THE TIME THE LAW WAS MADE. In the year 1778

several of those cases were, by certiorari, brought before the

superior court for the district of Edentorn, where the decisions of

the county courts were reversed, the superior court declaring, that

said county courts, in such their proceedings, have exceeded their

jurisdiction, violated the rights of the subject, and acted in direct

opposition to the Bill of Rights of this state, considered justly as

part of the constitution thereof; by giving to a law, not intended to

affect this case, a retrospective operation, thereby to deprive free

men of this state of their liberty, contrary to the laws of the land.

In consequence of this decree several of the negroes were again set at

liberty; but the next General Assembly, early in 1779, passed a law,

wherein they mention, that doubts have arisen, whether the purchasers

of such slaves have a good and legal title thereto, and CONFIRM the

same; under which they were again taken up by the purchasers and

reduced to slavery."

[The number of persons thus re-enslaved was 134.]

The following are the decrees of the Courts, ordering the sale of

those freemen:--

"Perquimans County, July term, at Hartford, A.D. 1777.

"These may certify, that it was then and there ordered, that the

sheriff of the county, to-morrow morning, at ten o'clock, expose to

sale, to the highest bidder, for ready money, at the court-house door,

the several negroes taken up as free, and in his custody, agreeable to

law.

"Test. WM. SKINNER, Clerk. "A true copy, 25th August, 1791. "Test. J.

HARVEY, Clerk."

"Pasquotank County, September Court, &c. &c. 1777.

"Present, the Worshipful Thomas Boyd, Timothy Hickson, John Paelin,

Edmund Clancey, Joseph Reading, and Thomas Rees, Esqrs. Justices.

"It was then and there ordered, that Thomas Reading, Esq. take the

FREE negroes taken up under an act to prevent domestic insurrections

and other purposes, and expose the same to _the best bidder_, at

public vendue, for ready money, and be accountable for the same,

agreeable to the aforesaid act; and make return to this or the next

succeeding court of his proceedings.

"A copy. ENOCH REESE, C.C."

THE PROTECTION OF "PUBLIC OPINION" TO DOMESTICS TIES.

The barbarous indifference with which slaveholders regard the forcible

sundering of husbands and wives, parents and children, brothers and

sisters, and the unfeeling brutality indicated by the language in

which they describe the efforts made by the slaves, in their yearnings

after those from whom they have been torn away, reveals a 'public

opinion' towards them as dead to their agony as if they were cattle.

It is well nigh impossible to open a southern paper without finding

evidence of this. Though the truth of this assertion can hardly be

called in question, we subjoin a few illustrations, and could easily

give hundreds.

From the "Savannah Georgian," Jan. 17, 1839. "$100 reward will be

given for my two fellows, Abram and Frank. Abram has a _wife_ at

Colonel Stewart's, in Liberty county, and a _sister_ in Savannah, at

Capt. Grovenstine's. Frank has a _wife_ at Mr. Le Cont's, Liberty

county; a _mother_ at Thunderbolt, and a _sister_ in Savannah.

WM. ROBARTS. Wallhourville, 5th Jan. 1839"

From the "Lexington (Ky.) Intelligencer." July 7, 1838.

"$160 Reward.--Ranaway from the subscribers living in this city, on

Saturday 16th inst. a negro man, named Dick, about 37 years of age. It

is highly probable said boy will make for New Orleans as _he has a

wife_ living in that city, and he has been heard to say frequently

that _he was determined to go to New Orleans_.

"DRAKE C. THOMPSON. "Lexington, June 17, 1838"

From the "Southern Argus," Oct. 31, 1837.

"Runaway--my negro man, Frederick, about 20 years of age. He is no

doubt near the plantation of G.W. Corprew, Esq of Noxubbee County,

Mississippi, as _his wife belongs to that gentleman, and he followed

her from my residence_. The above reward will be paid to any one who

will confine him in jail and inform me of it at Athens, Ala. "Athens,

Alabama. KERKMAN LEWIS."

From the "Savannah Georgian," July 8, 1837.

"Ran away from the subscriber, his man Joe. He visits the city

occasionally, where he has been harbored by his _mother_ and _sister_.

I will give one hundred dollars for proof sufficient to _convict his

harborers_. R.P.T. MONGIN."

The "Macon (Georgia) Messenger," Nov. 23, 1837, has the following:--

"$25 Reward.--Ran away, a negro man, named Cain. He was brought from

Florida, and _has a wife near Mariana_, and probably will attempt to

make his way there. H.L. COOK."

From the "Richmond (Va.) Whig," July 25, 1837.

"Absconded from the subscriber, a negro man, by the name of Wilson. He

was born in the county of New Kent, and raised by a gentleman named

Ratliffe, and by him sold to a gentleman named Taylor, on whose farm

he had a _wife_ and _several children_. Mr. Taylor sold him to a Mr.

Slater, who, in consequence of removing to Alabama, Wilson left; and

when retaken was sold, and afterwards purchased, by his present owner,

from T. McCargo and Co. of Richmond."

From the "Savannah (Ga. ) Republican," Sept. 3, 1838.

"$20 Reward for my negro man Jim.--Jim is about 50 or 55 years of age.

It is probable he will aim for Savannah, as he said _he had children_

in that vicinity.

J.G. OWENS.

Barnwell District, S.C."

From the "Staunton (Va.) Spectator," Jan. 3, 1839.

"Runaway, Jesse.--He has a _wife_, who belongs to Mr. John Ruff, of

Lexington, Rockbridge county, and he may probably be lurking in that

neighborhood. MOSES McCUE."

From the "Augusta (Georgia) Chronicle," July 10, 1837.

"$120 Reward for my negro Charlotte. She is about 20 years old. She

was purchased some months past from Mr. Thomas. J. Walton, of Augusta,

by Thomas W. Oliver; and, as her _mother_ and acquaintances live in

that city, it is very likely she is _harbored_ by some of them. MARTHA

OLIVER."

From the "Raleigh (N.C.) Register," July 18, 1837.

Ranaway from the subscriber, a negro man named Jim, the property of

Mrs. Elizabeth Whitfield. He _has a wife_ at the late Hardy Jones',

and may probably be lurking in that neighborhood. JOHN O'RORKE."

From the "Richmond (Va.) Compiler," Sept. 8, 1837.

"Ranaway from the subscriber, Ben. He ran off without any known cause,

and _I suppose he is aiming to go to his wife, who was carried from

the neighborhood last winter_. JOHN HUNT."

From the "Charleston (S.C.) Mercury," Aug. 1, 1837.

"Absconded from Mr. E.D. Bailey, on Wadmalaw, his negro man, named

Saby. Said fellow was purchased in January, from Francis Dickinson, of

St. Paul's parish, and is probably now in that neighborhood, _where he

has a wife_. THOMAS N. GADSDEN."

From the "Portsmouth (Va.) Times," August 3, 1838.

"$50 dollars Reward will be given for the apprehension of my negro man

Isaac. He _has a wife_ at James M. Riddick's, of Gates county, N.C.

where he may probably be lurking. C. MILLER."

From the "Savannah (Georgia) Republican." May 24, 1838.

"$40 Reward.--Ran away from the subscriber in Savannah, his negro girl

Patsey. She was purchased among the gang of negroes, known as the

Hargreave's estate. She is no doubt lurking about Liberty county, at

which place _she has relatives_. EDWARD HOUSTOUN, of Florida"

From the "Charleston (S.C.) Courier," June 29, 1837.

"$20 Reward will be paid for the apprehension and delivery, at the

workhouse in Charleston, of a mulatto woman, named Ida. It is probable

she may have made her way into Georgia, where she has _connections_.

MATTHEW MUGGRIDGE."

From the "Norfolk (Va.) Beacon," March 31, 1838.

"The subscriber will give $20 for the apprehension of his negro woman,

Maria, who ran away about twelve months since. She is known to be

lurking in or about Chuckatuch, in the county of Nansemond, where _she

has a husband_, and _formerly belonged_. PETER ONEILL."

From the "Macon (Georgia) Messenger," Jan. 16, 1839.

"Ranaway from the subscriber, two negroes, Davis, a man about 45 years

old; also Peggy, his wife, near the same age. Said negroes will

probably make their way to Columbia county, as _they have children_

living in that county. I will liberally reward any person who may

deliver them to me. NEHEMIAH KING."

From the "Petersburg (Va.) Constellation," June 27, 1837.

"Ranaway, a negro man, named Peter. _He has a wife_ at the plantation

of Mr. C. Haws, near Suffolk, where it is supposed he is still

lurking. JOHN L. DUNN."

From the "Richmond (Va.) Whig," Dec. 7, 1739.

"Ranaway from the subscriber, a negro man, named John Lewis. It is

supposed that he is lurking about in New Kent county, where he

professes to have a _wife_. HILL JONES, Agent for R.F. & P. Railroad Co."

From the "Red River (La.) Whig," June 2d, 1838.

"Ran away from the subscriber, a mulatto woman, named Maria. It is

probable she may be found in the neighborhood of Mr. Jesse Bynum's

plantation, where _she has relations_, &c. THOMAS J. WELLS."

From the "Lexington (Ky.) Observer and Reporter," Sept. 28, 1838.

"$50 Reward.--Ran away from the subscriber, a negro girl, named Maria.

She is of a copper color, between 13 and 14 years of age--_bare

headed_ and _bare footed_. She is small of her age--very sprightly and

very likely. She stated she was _going to see her mother_ at

Maysville. SANFORD THOMSON."

From the "Jackson (Tenn.) Telegraph," Sept. 14, 1838.

"Committed to the jail of Madison county, a negro woman, who calls her

name Fanny, and says she belongs to William Miller, of Mobile. She

formerly belonged to John Givins, of this county, who now owns

_several of her children_. DAVID SHROPSHIRE, Jailor."

From the "Norfolk (Va.) Beacon," July 3d, 1838.

"Runaway from my plantation below Edenton, my negro man, Nelson. _He

has a mother living_ at Mr. James Goodwin's, in Ballahack, Perquimans

county; and _two brothers_, one belonging to Job Parker, and the other

to Josiah Coffield. WM. D. RASCOE."

From the "Charleston (S.C.) Courier," Jan. 12, 1838.

"$100 Reward.--Run away from the subscriber, his negro fellow, John.

He is well known about the city as one of my bread carriers: _has a

wife_ living at Mrs. Weston's, on Hempstead. John formerly belonged to

Mrs. Moor, near St. Paul's church, where his _mother_ still lives, and

_has been harbored by her_ before.

JOHN T. MARSHALL.

60, Tradd street."

From the "Newbern (N.C.) Sentinel," March 17, 1837.

"Ranaway, Moses, a black fellow, about 40 years of age--has a _wife_

in Washington.

THOMAS BRAGG, Sen.

Warrenton, N.C."

From the "Richmond (Va.) Whig," June 30, 1837.

"Ranaway, my man Peter.--He has a _sister_ and _mother_ in New Kent,

and a _wife_ about fifteen or eighteen miles above Richmond, at or

about Taylorsville. THEO. A. LACY."

From the "New Orleans Bulletin," Feb. 7, 1838.

"Ranaway, my negro Philip, aged about 40 years.--He may have gone to

St. Louis, as _he has a wife there_. W.G. CLARK, 70 New Levee."

From the "Georgian," Jan. 29, 1838.

"A Reward of $5 will be paid for the apprehension of his negro woman,

Diana. Diana is from 45 to 50 age. She formerly belonged to Mr. Nath.

Law, of Liberty county, _where her husband still lives_. She will

endeavor to go there perhaps. D. O'BYRNE."

From the "Richmond (Va.) Enquirer," Feb. 20, 1838.

"$10 Reward for a negro woman, named Sally, 40 years old. We have just

reason to believe the said negro to be now lurking on the James River

Canal, or in the Green Spring neighborhood, where, we are informed,

_her husband resides_. The above reward will be given to any person

_securing_ her.

POLLY C. SHIELDS.

Mount Elba, Feb. 19, 1838."

"$50 Reward.--Ran away from the subscriber, his negro man Pauladore,

commonly called Paul. I understand GEN. R.Y. HAYNE _has purchased his

wife and children_ from H.L. PINCKNEY, Esq. and has them now on his

plantation at Goosecreek, where, no doubt, the fellow is frequently

_lurking_. T. DAVIS."

"$25 Reward.--Ran away from the subscriber, a negro woman, named

Matilda. It is thought she may be somewhere up James River, as she was

claimed as _a wife_ by some boatman in Goochland. J. ALVIS."

"Stop the Runaway!!!--$25 Reward. Ranaway from the Eagle Tavern, a

negro fellow, named Nat. He is no doubt attempting to _follow his

wife, who was lately sold to a speculator_ named Redmond. The above

reward will be paid by Mrs. Lucy M. Downman, of Sussex county, Va."

Multitudes of advertisements like the above appear annually in the

southern papers. Reader, look at the preceding list--mark the

unfeeling barbarity with which their masters and _mistresses_ describe

the struggles and perils of sundered husbands and wives, parents and

children, in their weary midnight travels through forests and rivers,

with torn limbs and breaking hearts, seeking the embraces of each

other's love. In one instance, a mother torn from all her children and

taken to a remote part of another state, presses her way back through

the wilderness, hundreds of miles, to clasp once more her children to

her heart: but, when she has arrived within a few miles of them, in

the same county, is discovered, seized, dragged to jail, and her

purchaser told, through an advertisement, that she awaits his order.

But we need not trace out the harrowing details already before the

reader.

Rev. C.S. RENSHAW, of Quincy, Illinois, who resided some time in

Kentucky, says;--

"I was told the following fact by a young lady, daughter of a

slaveholder in Boone county, Kentucky, who lived within half a mile of

Mr. Hughes' farm. Hughes and Neil traded in slaves down the river:

they had bought up a part of their stock in the upper counties of

Kentucky, and brought them down to Louisville, where the remainder of

their drove was in jail, waiting their arrival. Just before the

steamboat put off for the lower country, two negro women were offered

for sale, each of them having a young child at the breast. The traders

bought them, took their babes from their arms, and offered them to the

highest bidder; and they were sold for one dollar apiece, whilst the

stricken parents were driven on board the boat; and in an hour were on

their way to the New Orleans market. You are aware that a young babe

_decreases_ the value of a field hand in the lower country, whilst it

increases her value in the 'breeding states.'"

The following is an extract from an address, published by the

Presbyterian Synod of Kentucky, to the churches under their care, in

1835:--

"Brothers and sisters, parents and children, husbands and wives, are

_torn asunder_, and permitted to see each other no more. These acts

are DAILY occurring in the midst of us. The _shrieks_ and the _agony,

often_ witnessed on such occasions, proclaim, with a trumpet tongue,

the iniquity of our system. _There is not a neighborhood_ where these

heart-rending scenes are not displayed. _There is not a village or

road_ that does not behold the sad procession of manacled outcasts,

whose mournful countenances tell that they are exiled by _force_ from

ALL THAT THEIR HEARTS HOLD DEAR."--_Address_, p. 12.

Professor ANDREWS, late of the University of North Carolina, in his

recent work on Slavery and the Slave Trade, page 147, in relating a

conversation with a slave-trader, whom he met near Washington City,

says, he inquired,

"'Do you _often_ buy the wife without the husband?' 'Yes, VERY OFTEN;

and FREQUENTLY, too, they _sell me the mother while they keep her

children. I have often known them take away the infant from its

mother's breast, and keep it, while they sold her_.'"

The following sale is advertised in the "Georgia Journal," Jan, 2,

1838.

"Will be sold, the following PROPERTY, to wit: One ---- CHILD, by the

name of James, _about eight months old_, levied on as the property of

Gabriel Gunn."

The following is a standing advertisement in the Charleston (S.C.)

papers:--

"120 Negroes for Sale--The subscriber has _just arrived from

Petersburg, Virginia_, with one hundred and twenty _likely young_

negroes of both sexes and every description, which he offers for sale

on the most reasonable terms.

"The lot now on hand consists of plough boys several likely and

well-qualified house servants of both sexes, several _women with

children, small girls_ suitable for nurses, and several SMALL BOYS

WITHOUT THEIR MOTHERS. Planters and traders are earnestly requested to

give the subscriber a call previously to making purchases elsewhere,

as he is enabled and will sell as cheap, or cheaper, than can be sold

by any other person in the trade. BENJAMIN DAVIS. Hamburg, S.C. Sept.

28, 1838."

Extract Of a letter to a member of Congress from a friend in

Mississippi, published in the "Washington Globe," June, 1837.

"The times are truly alarming here. Many plantations _are entirely

stripped of negroes_ (protection!) and horses, by the marshal or

sheriff.--Suits are multiplying--two thousand five hundred in the

United States Circuit Court, and three thousand in Hinds County

Court."

Testimony of MR. SILAS STONE, of Hudson, New York. Mr. Stone is a

member of the Episcopal Church, has several times been elected an

Assessor of the city of Hudson, and for three years has filled the

office of Treasurer of the County. In the fall of 1807, Mr. Stone

witnessed a sale of slaves, in Charleston, South Carolina, which he

thus describes in a communication recently received from him.

"I saw droves of the poor fellows driven to the slave markets kept in

different parts of the city, one of which I visited. The arrangements

of this place appeared something like our northern horse-markets,

having sheds, or barns, in the rear of a public house, where alcohol

was a handy ingredient to stimulate the spirit of jockeying. As the

traders appeared, lots of negroes were brought from the stables into

the bar room, and by a flourish of the whip were made to assume an

active appearance. 'What will you give for these fellows?' 'How old

are they? 'Are they healthy?' 'Are they quick?' &c. at the same time

the owner would give them a cut with a cowhide, and tell them to dance

and jump, cursing and swearing at them if they did not move quick. In

fact all the transactions in buying and selling slaves, partakes of

jockey-ship, as much as buying and selling horses. There was as little

regard paid to the feelings of the former as we witness in the latter.

"From these scenes I turn to another, which took place in front of the

noble 'Exchange Buildings,' in the heart of the city. On the left side

of the steps, as you leave the main hall, immediately under the

windows of that proud building, was a stage built, on which a mother

with eight children were placed, and sold at auction. I watched their

emotions closely, and saw their feelings were in accordance to human

nature. The sale began with the eldest child, who, being struck off to

the highest bidder, was taken from the stage or platform by the

purchaser, and led to his wagon and stowed away, to be carried into

the country; the second, and third were also sold, and so until seven

of the children were torn from their mother, while her discernment

told her they were to be separated probably forever, causing in that

mother the most agonizing sobs and cries, in which the children seemed

to share. The scene beggars description; suffice it to say, it was

sufficient to cause tears from one at least 'whose skin was not

colored like their own,' and I was not ashamed to give vent to them."

THE "PROTECTION" AFFORDED BY "PUBLIC OPINION"

TO CHILDHOOD AND OLD AGE.

In the "New Orleans Bee," May 31, 1837, MR. P. BAHI, gives notice that

he has _committed to_ JAIL as a runaway 'a _little_ negro AGED ABOUT

SEVEN YEARS.'

In the "Mobile Advertiser," Sept. 13, 1838, WILLIAM MAGEE, Sheriff,

gives notice that George Walton, Esq. Mayor of the city has

_committed_ to JAIL as a runaway slave, Jordan, ABOUT TWELVE YEARS

OLD, and the Sheriff proceeds to give notice that if no one claims him

the boy will be _sold as a slave_ to pay jail fees.

In the "Memphis (Tenn.) Gazette," May 2, 1837, W.H. MONTGOMERY

advertises that he will sell at auction a BOY AGED 14, ANOTHER AGED

12, AND A GIRL 10, to pay the debts of their deceased master.

B.F. CHAPMAN, Sheriff, Natchitoches (La.) advertises in the

'Herald,' of May 17, 1837, that he has "_committed to_ JAIL, as a

runaway a negro boy BETWEEN 11 AND 12 YEARS OF AGE."

In the "Augusta (Ga.) Chronicle," Feb. 13, 1838. R.H. JONES, jailor,

says, "Brought to _jail_ a negro _woman_ Sarah, she is about 60 or 65

_years old_."

In the "Winchester Virginian," August 8, 1837, Mr. R.H. MENIFEE,

offers ten dollars reward to any one who will catch and lodge in jail,

Abram and Nelly, _about_ 60 _years old_, so that he can get them

again.

J. SNOWDEN, Jailor, Columbia, S.C. gives notice in the "Telescope,"

Nov, 18, 1837, that he has committed to jail as a runaway slave,

"_Caroline fifty years of age_."

Y.S. PICKARD, Jailor, Savannah, Georgia, gives notice in the

"Georgian," June 22, 1837, that he has taken up for a runaway and

lodged in jail Charles, 60 _years of age_.

In the Savannah "Georgian," April 12, 1837, Mr. J. CUYLER, says he

will give five dollars, to anyone who will catch and bring back to him

"Saman, _an old negro man, and grey, and has only one eye_."

In the "Macon (Ga.) Telegraph," Jan. 15, 1839, MESSRS. T. AND L.

NAPIER, advertise for sale Nancy, a woman 65 _years of age_, and

Peggy, a woman 65 _years of age_.

The following is from the "Columbian (Ga.) Enquirer," March 8, 1838.

"$25 REWARD.--Ranaway, a Negro Woman named MATILDA, aged about 30 or

35 years. Also, on the same night, a Negro Fellow of small size, VERY

AGED, _stoop-shouldered_, who walks VERY DECREPIDLY, is supposed to

have gone off. His name is DAVE, and he has claimed Matilda for wife.

It may be they have gone off together.

"I will give twenty-five dollars for the woman, delivered to me in

Muscogee county, or confined in any jail so that I can get her. MOSES

BUTT."

J.B. RANDALL, Jailor, Cobb (Co.) Georgia, advertises an old negro man,

in the "Milledgeville Recorder," Nov. 6, 1838.

"A NEGRO MAN, has been lodged in the common jail of this county, who

says his name is JUPITER. He _has lost all his front teeth above and

below--speaks very indistinctly, is very lame, so that he can hardly

walk_."

Rev. CHARLES STEWART RENSHAW, of Quincy, Illinois, who spent some time

in slave states, speaking of his residence in Kentucky, says:--

"One Sabbath morning, whilst riding to meeting near Burlington, Boone

Co. Kentucky, in company with Mr. Willis, a teacher of sacred music

and a member of the Presbyterian Church, I was startled at mingled

shouts and screams, proceeding from an old log house, some distance

from the road side. As we passed it, some five or six boys from 12 to

15 years of age, came out, some of them cracking whips, followed by

two colored boys crying. I asked Mr. W. what the scene meant. 'Oh,' he

replied, 'those boys have been whipping the niggers; that is the way

we bring slaves into subjection in Kentucky--we let the children beat

them.' The boys returned again into the house, and again their

shouting and stamping was heard, but ever and anon a scream of agony

that would not be drowned, rose above the uproar; thus they continued

till the sounds were lost in the distance."

Well did Jefferson say, that the children of slaveholders are 'NURSED,

EDUCATED, AND DAILY EXERCISED IN TYRANNY.'

The 'protection' thrown around a mother's yearnings, and the

helplessness of childhood by the 'public opinion' of slaveholders, is

shown by _thousands_ of advertisements of which the following are

samples.

From the "New Orleans Bulletin," June 2.

"NEGROES FOR SALE.--A negro woman 21 years of age, and has two

children, one eight and the other three years. Said negroes will be

sold SEPARATELY or together _as desired_. The woman is a good

seamstress. She will be sold low for cash, or _exchanged_ for

GROCERIES. For terms apply to MAYHEW BLISS, & CO. 1 Front Levee."

From the "Georgia Journal," Nov. 7.

"TO BE SOLD--One negro girl about 18 _months old_, belonging to the

estate of William Chambers, dec'd. Sold for the purpose of

_distribution!!_ JETHRO DEAN, SAMUEL BEALL, Ex'ors."

From the "Natchez Courier," April 2, 1838.

"NOTICE--Is hereby given that the undersigned pursuant to a certain

Deed of Trust will on Thursday the 12th day of April next, expose to

sale at the Court House, to the highest bidder for cash, the following

Negro slaves, to wit; Fanny, aged about 28 years; Mary, aged about 7

years; Amanda, aged about 3 months; Wilson, aged about 9 months.

Said slaves, to be sold for the satisfaction of the debt secured in

said Deed of Trust. W.J. MINOR."

From the "Milledgeville Journal," Dec. 26, 1837.

"EXECUTOR'S SALE.

"Agreeable to an order of the court of Wilkinson county, will be sold

on the first Tuesday in April next, before the Court-house door in the

town of Irwington, ONE NEGRO GIRL _about two years old_, named Rachel,

belonging to the estate of William Chambers dec'd. Sold _for the

benefit_ of the heirs and creditors of said estate.

SAMUEL BELL, JESSE PEACOCK, Ex'ors."

From the "Alexandria (D.C.) Gazette" Dec. 19.

"I will give the highest cash price for likely negroes, _from 10 to 25

years of age_.

GEO. KEPHART."

From the "Southern Whig," March 2, 1838.--

"WILL be sold in La Grange, Troup county, one negro girl, by the name

of Charity, aged about 10 or 12 years; as the property of Littleton L.

Burk, to satisfy a mortgage fi. fa. from Troup Inferior Court, in

favor of Daniel S. Robertson vs. said Burk."

From the "Petersburgh (Va.) Constellation," March 18, 1837.

"50 _Negroes wanted immediately_.--The subscriber will give a good

market price for fifty likely negroes, _from 10 to 30 years of age_.

HENRY DAVIS."

The following is an extract of a letter from a gentleman, a native and

still a resident of one of the slave states, and _still a

slaveholder_. He is an elder in the Presbyterian Church, his letter is

now before us, and his name is with the Executive Committee of the Am.

Anti-slavery Society.

"Permit me to say, that around this very place where I reside, slaves

are brought almost constantly, and sold to Miss. and Orleans; that _it

is usual_ to part families forever by such sales--the parents from the

children and the children from the parents, of every size and age. A

mother was taken not long since, in this town, from a _sucking child_,

and sold to the lower country. Three young men I saw some time ago

taken from this place in chains--while the mother of one of them, old

and decrepid, _followed with tears and prayers her son, 18 or 20

miles, and bid him a final farewell_! O, thou Great Eternal, is this

justice! is this equity!!--Equal Rights!!"

We subjoin a few miscellaneous facts illustrating the INHUMANITY of

slaveholding 'public opinion.'

The shocking indifference manifested at the death of slaves as _human

beings_, contrasted with the grief at their loss _as property_, is a

true index to the public opinion of slaveholders.

Colonel Oliver of Louisville, lost a valuable race-horse by the

explosion of the steamer Oronoko, a few months since on the

Mississippi river. Eight human beings whom he held as slaves were also

killed by the explosion. They were the riders and grooms of his

race-horses. A Louisville paper thus speaks of the occurrence:

"Colonel Oliver suffered severely by the explosion of the Oronoko. He

lost _eight_ of his rubbers and riders, and his horse, Joe Kearney,

which he had sold the night before for $3,000."

Mr. King, of the New York American, makes the following just comment

on the barbarity of the above paragraph: