Mr. _Selden_, in his preface to _Drayton's Polyolbion_, says,--

"I cannot but digresse to admonition of abuse which this learned

allusion, in his _Troilus_, by ignorance hath indured.

"'I am till God mee better mind send,

At _Dulcarnon_, right at my wit's end.'

It's not _Neckam_, or any else, that can make mee entertaine the

least thought of the signification of _Dulcarnon_ to be

_Pythagorus_ his sacrifice after his geometricall theorem in

finding the square of an orthogonall triangle's sides, or that

it is a word of _Latine_ deduction: but, indeed, by easier

pronunciation it was made of D'hulkarnyan[5], i.e. _two-horned_

which the _Mahometan Arabians_ {109} vie for a root in

calculation, meaning _Alexander_, as that great dictator of

knowledge, _Joseph Scaliger_ (with some ancients) wills, but, by

warranted opinion of my learned friend Mr. _Lydyat_, in his

_Emendatio Temporum_, it began in _Seleucus Nicanor_, XII yeares

after _Alexander's_ death. The name was applyed, either because

after time that _Alexander_ had persuaded himself to be _Jupiter

Hammon's_ sonne, whose statue was with _Ram's_ hornes, both his

owne and his successors' coins were stampt with horned images:

or else in respect of his II pillars erected in the East as a

_Nihil ultra_[6] of his conquest, and some say because hee had

in power the Easterne and Westerne World, signified in the two

hornes. But howsoever, it well fits the passage, either, as if

hee had personated _Creseide_ at the entrance of two wayes, not

knowing which to take; in like sense as that of _Prodicus_ his

_Hercules_, _Pythagoras_ his _Y._, or the Logicians _Dilemma_

expresse; or else, which is the truth of his conceit, that hee

was at a _nonplus_, as the interpretation in his next staffe

makes plaine. How many of noble _Chaucer's_ readers never so

much as suspect this his short essay of knowledge, transcending

the common Rode? And by his treatise of the _Astrolabe_ (which,

I dare sweare, was chiefly learned out of _Messahalah_) it is

plaine hee was much acquainted with the mathematiques, and

amongst their authors had it."

_D'Herbelot_ says:

"_Dhoul_ (or _Dhu_) _carnun_, _with the two horns_, is the

surname of _Alexander_, that is, of an ancient and fabulous

Alexander of the first dynasty of the Persians. 795. Article

Sedd, Tagioug and Magioug. 993. Article Khedher. 395. b. 335. b.

Fael.

"But 317. Escander, he says, Alexander the Great has the same

title secondarily. The truth probably is the reverse, that the

fabulous personage was taken from the real conqueror.

"_Hofmann_, in Seleucus, says that the area of Seleucus is

called Terik Dhylkarnain, i.e. Epocha Alexandri Cornigen. Tarik

means probably the date of an event."

There can be no doubt that the word in Chaucer is this Arabic word; nor,

I think, that Speght's story is really taught by the Arabs, our teachers

in mathematics. Whether the application is from Alexander, (they would

know nothing of his date with regard to Pythagoras), or merely from

two-horned, is doubtful. The latter might possibly mean the ox.

Mr. Halliwell gives a quotation from Stanyhurst, in which it means "dull

persons"--an obvious misuse of it for Englishmen, and which Skene

fortifies by an A.-S. derivation, but which is clearly not Cressida's

meaning, or she would have said, "I _am_ Dulcarnon," not "I _am at_

Dulcarnon;" and so Mrs. Roper.

It may seem difficult what Pandarus can mean:

"Dulcarnon clepid is fleming of wretches,

It semith hard, for wretchis wol nought lere

For very slouthe, or othir wilfull tetches,

This said is by them that ben't worth two fetches,

But ye ben wise."

Whether he means that wretches call it _fleming_ or not, his argument

is, "You are not a wretch." Speght's derivation seems to mean, "Quod

stultos vertit." _Fleamas_, A.-S. (Lye), is _fuga_, _fugacio_, from

_flean_, to flee. Pandarus, I think, does not mean to give the

derivation of the word, but its application of fools, a stumbling-block,

or puzzle.

Notes and Queries, Number 37, July 13, 1850 · 第 64 / 86 题