XIX. To Robert Burns.

Sir,--Among men of Genius, and especially among Poets, there are some to

whom we turn with a peculiar and unfeigned affection; there are others

whom we admire rather than love. By some we are won with our will, by

others conquered against our desire. It has been your peculiar fortune

to capture the hearts of a whole people--a people not usually prone to

praise, but devoted with a personal and patriotic loyalty to you and to

your reputation. In you every Scot who _is_ a Scot sees, admires, and

compliments Himself, his ideal self--independent, fond of whisky,

fonder of the lassies; you are the true representative of him and of his

nation. Next year will be the hundredth since the press of Kilmarnock

brought to light its solitary masterpiece, your Poems; and next year,

therefore, methinks, the revenue will receive a welcome accession from

the abundance of whisky drunk in your honour. It is a cruel thing for

any of your countrymen to feel that, where all the rest love, he can

only admire; where all the rest are idolators, he may not bend the knee;

but stands apart and beats upon his breast, observing, not adoring--a

critic. Yet to some of us--petty souls, perhaps, and envious--that loud

indiscriminating praise of 'Robbie Burns' (for so they style you in

their Change-house familiarity) has long been ungrateful; and, among the

treasures of your songs, we venture to select and even to reject. So it

must be! We cannot all love Haggis, nor 'painch, tripe, and thairm,'

and all those rural dainties which you celebrate as 'warm-reekin, rich!'

'Rather too rich,' as the Young Lady said on an occasion recorded by Sam

Weller.

Auld Scotland wants nae skinking ware

That jaups in luggies;

But, if ye wish her gratefu' prayer,

Gie her a Haggis!

You _have_ given her a Haggis, with a vengeance, and her 'gratefu' prayer' is

yours for ever. But if even an eternity of partridge may pall on the

epicure, so of Haggis too, as of all earthly delights, cometh satiety at

last. And yet what a glorious Haggis it is--the more emphatically rustic

and even Fescennine part of your verse! We have had many a rural bard

since Theocritus 'watched the visionary flocks,' but you are the only

one of them all who has spoken the sincere Doric. Yours is the talk of

the byre and the plough-tail; yours is that large utterance of the early

hinds. Even Theocritus minces matters, save where Lacon and Comatas

quite outdo the swains of Ayrshire. 'But thee, Theocritus, wha matches?'

you ask, and yourself out-match him in this wide rude region, trodden

only by the rural Muse.

'_Thy_ rural loves are nature's sel';' and the wooer of Jean Armour

speaks more like a true shepherd than the elegant Daphnis of the

'Oaristys.'

Indeed it is with this that moral critics of your life reproach you,

forgetting, perhaps, that in your amours you were but as other Scotch

ploughmen and shepherds of the past and present. Ettrick may still, with

Afghanistan, offer matter for idylls, as Mr. Carlyle (your antithesis,

and the complement of the Scotch character) supposed; but the morals of

Ettrick are those of rural Sicily in old days, or of Mossgiel in your

days. Over these matters the Kirk, with all her power, and the Free Kirk

too, have had absolutely no influence whatever. To leave so delicate a

topic, you were but as other swains, or, as 'that Birkie ca'd a lord,'

Lord Byron; only you combined (in certain of your letters) a libertine

theory with your practice; you poured out in song your audacious

raptures, your half-hearted repentance, your shame and your scorn. You

spoke the truth about rural lives and loves. We may like it or dislike

it; but we cannot deny the verity.

Was it not as unhappy a thing, Sir, for you, as it was fortunate for

Letters and for Scotland, that you were born at the meeting of two ages

and of two worlds--precisely in the moment when bookish literature was

beginning to reach the people, and when Society was first learning to

admit the low-born to her Minor Mysteries? Before you how many singers

not less truly poets than yourself--though less versatile not less

passionate, though less sensuous not less simple--had been born and had

died in poor men's cottages! There abides not even the shadow of a name

of the old Scotch song-smiths, of the old ballad-makers. The authors of

'Clerk Saunders,' of 'The Wife of Usher's Well,' of 'Fair Annie,' and

'Sir Patrick Spens,' and 'The Bonny Hind,' are as unknown to us as

Homer, whom in their directness and force they resemble. They never,

perhaps, gave their poems to writing; certainly they never gave them to

the press. On the lips and in the hearts of the people they have their

lives; and the singers, after a life obscure and untroubled by society

or by fame, are forgotten. 'The Iniquity of Oblivion blindly scattereth

his Poppy.'

Had you been born some years earlier you would have been even as

these unnamed Immortals, leaving great verses to a little clan--verses

retained only by Memory. You would have been but the minstrel of your

native valley: the wider world would not have known you, nor you the

world. Great thoughts of independence and revolt would never have burned

in you; indignation would not have vexed you. Society would not have

given and denied her caresses. You would have been happy. Your songs

would have lingered in all 'the circle of the summer hills;' and your

scorn, your satire, your narrative verse, would have been unwritten or

unknown. To the world what a loss! and what a gain to you! We should

have possessed but a few of your lyrics, as

When o'er the hill the eastern star

Tells bughtin-time is near, my jo;

And owsen frae the furrowed field,

Return sae dowf and wearie O!

How noble that is, how natural, how unconsciously Greek! You found,

oddly, in good Mrs. Barbauld, the merits of the Tenth Muse:

In thy sweet sang, Barbauld, survives

Even Sappho's flame!

But how unconsciously you remind us both of Sappho and of Homer in these

strains about the Evening Star and the hour when the Day _metenisseto

boulytoide_?* Had you lived and died the pastoral poet of some silent

glen, such lyrics could not but have survived; free, too, of all that

in your songs reminds us of the Poet's Corner in the 'Kirkcudbright

Advertiser.' We should not have read how

Phoebus, gilding the brow o' morning,

Banishes ilk darksome shade!

Still we might keep a love-poem unexcelled by Catullus,

Had we never loved sae kindly,

Had we never loved sae blindly,

Never met--or never parted,

We had ne'er been broken-hearted.

But the letters to Clarinda would have been unwritten, and the thrush

would have been untaught in 'the style of the Bird of Paradise.'

*Transliterated from Greek.

A quiet life of song, _fallentis semita vitae_', was not to be yours.

Fate otherwise decreed it. The touch of a lettered society, the strife

with the Kirk, discontent with the State, poverty and pride, neglect and

success, were needed to make your Genius what it was, and to endow the

world with 'Tam o' Shanter,' the 'Jolly Beggars,' and 'Holy Willie's

Prayer.' Who can praise them too highly--who admire in them too much the

humour, the scorn, the wisdom, the unsurpassed energy and courage? So

powerful, so commanding, is the movement of that Beggars' Chorus, that,

methinks, it unconsciously echoed in the brain of our greatest living

poet when he conceived the Vision of Sin. You shall judge for yourself.

Recall:

Here's to budgets, bags, and wallets!

Here's to all the wandering train!

Here's our ragged bairns and callers!

One and all cry out, Amen!

A fig for those by law protected!

Liberty's a glorious feast!

Courts for cowards were erected!

Churches built to please the priest!

Then read this: Drink to lofty hopes that cool

Visions of a perfect state:

Drink we, last, the public fool,

Frantic love and frantic hate.

......... Drink to Fortune, drink to Chance,

While we keep a little breath!

Drink to heavy Ignorance

Hob and nob with brother Death!

Is not the movement the same, though the modern speaks a wilder

recklessness?

So in the best company we leave you, who were the life and soul of so

much company, good and bad. No poet, since the Psalmist of Israel,

ever gave the world more assurance of a man; none lived a life more

strenuous, engaged in an eternal conflict of the passions, and by them

overcome--'mighty and mightily fallen.' When we think of you, Byron

seems, as Plato would have said, remote by one degree from actual truth,

and Musset by a degree more remote than Byron.

Letters to Dead Authors(#3319) · 第 25 / 28 题