XVI. To Eusebius of Caesarea.

(Concerning the Gods of the Heathen.)

Touching the Gods of the Heathen, most reverend Father, thou art not

ignorant that even now, as in the time of thy probation on earth, there

is great dissension. That these feigned Deities and idols, the work of

men's hands, are no longer worshipped thou knowest; neither do men eat

meat offered to idols. Even as spoke that last Oracle which murmured

forth, the latest and the only true voice from Delphi, even so 'the

fair-wrought court divine hath fallen; no more hath Phoebus his home,

no more his laurel-bough, nor the singing well of water; nay, the

sweet-voiced water is silent.' The fane is ruinous, and the images of

men's idolatry are dust.

Nevertheless, most worshipful, men do still dispute about the beginnings

of those sinful Gods: such as Zeus, Athene, and Dionysus: and marvel

how first they won their dominion over the souls of the foolish peoples.

Now, concerning these things there is not one belief, but many;

howbeit, there are two main kinds of opinion. One sect of philosophers

believes--as thyself, with heavenly learning, didst not vainly

persuade--that the Gods were the inventions of wild and bestial folk,

who, long before cities were builded or life was honourably ordained,

fashioned forth evil spirits in their own savage likeness; ay, or in the

likeness of the very beasts that perish. To this judgment, as it is set

forth in thy Book of the Preparation for the Gospel, I, humble as I

am, do give my consent. But on the other side are many and learned men,

chiefly of the tribes of the Alemanni, who have almost conquered the

whole inhabited world. These, being unwilling to suppose that the

Hellenes were in bondage to superstitions handed down from times of

utter darkness and a bestial life, do chiefly hold with the heathen

philosophers, even with the writers whom thou, most venerable, didst

confound with thy wisdom and chasten with the scourge of small cords of

thy wit.

Thus, like the heathen, our doctors and teachers maintain that the Gods

of the nations were, in the beginning, such pure natural creatures as

the blue sky, the sun, the air, the bright dawn, and the fire; but, as

time went on, men, forgetting the meaning of their own speech and no

longer understanding the tongue of their own fathers, were misled and

beguiled into fashioning all those lamentable tales: as that Zeus, for

love of mortal women, took the shape of a bull, a ram, a serpent, an

ant, an eagle, and sinned in such wise as it is a shame even to speak

of.

Behold, then, most worshipful, how these doctors and learned men argue,

even like the philosophers of the heathen whom thou didst confound. For

they declare the Gods to have been natural elements, sun and sky and

storm, even as did thy opponents; and, like them, as thou saidst, 'they

are nowise at one with each other in their explanations.' For of old

some boasted that Hera was the Air; and some that she signified the love

of woman and man; and some that she was the waters above the Earth; and

others that she was the Earth beneath the waters; and yet others

that she was the Night, for that Night is the shadow of Earth: as if,

forsooth, the men who first worshipped Hera had understanding of these

things! And when Hera and Zeus quarrel unseemly (as Homer declareth),

this meant (said the learned in thy days) no more than the strife

and confusion of the elements, and was not in the beginning an idle

slanderous tale.

To all which, most worshipful, thou didst answer wisely: saying that

Hera could not be both night, and earth, and water, and air, and the

love of sexes, and the confusion of the elements; but that all these

opinions were vain dreams, and the guesses of the learned. And why--thou

saidst--even if the Gods were pure natural creatures, are such foul

things told of them in the Mysteries as it is not fitting for me to

declare. 'These wanderings, and drinkings, and loves, and corruptions,

that would be shameful in men, why,' thou saidst, 'were they attributed

to the natural elements; and wherefore did the Gods constantly show

themselves, like the sorcerers called were-wolves, in the shape of

the perishable beasts?' But, mainly, thou didst argue that, till the

philosophers of the heathen were agreed among themselves, not all

contradicting each the other, they had no semblance of a sure foundation

for their doctrine.

To all this and more, most worshipful Father, I know not what the

heathen answered thee. But, in our time, the learned men who stand to it

that the heathen Gods were in the beginning the pure elements, and that

the nations, forgetting their first love and the significance of their

own speech, became confused and were betrayed into foul stories about

the pure Gods--these learned men, I say, agree no whit among themselves.

Nay, they differ one from another, not less than did Plutarch and

Porphyry and Theagenes, and the rest whom thou didst laugh to scorn.

Bear with me, Father, while I tell thee how the new Plutarchs and

Porphyrys do contend among themselves; and yet these differences of

theirs they call 'Science'!

Consider the goddess Athene, who sprang armed from the head of Zeus,

even as--among the fables of the poor heathen folk of seas thou never

knewest--goddesses are fabled to leap out from the armpits or feet of

their fathers. Thou must know that what Plato, in the 'Cratylus,' made

Socrates say in jest, the learned among us practise in sad earnest. For,

when they wish to explain the nature of any God, they first examine

his name, and torment the letters thereof, arranging and altering them

according to their will, and flying off to the speech of the Indians and

Medes and Chaldeans, and other Barbarians, if Greek will not serve their

turn. How saith Socrates? 'I bethink me of a very new and ingenious idea

that occurs to me; and, if I do not mind, I shall be wiser than I should

be by to-morrow's dawn. My notion is that we may put in and pull out

letters at pleasure and alter the accents.' Even so do our learned--not

at pleasure, maybe, but according to certain fixed laws (so they

declare); yet none the more do they agree among themselves. And I deny

not that they discover many things true and good to be known; but,

as touching the names of the Gods, their learning, as it standeth, is

confusion. Look, then, at the goddess Athene: taking one example out of

hundreds. We have dwelling in our coasts Muellerus, the most erudite

of the doctors of the Alemanni, and the most golden-mouthed. Concerning

Athene, he saith that her name is none other than, in the ancient tongue

of the Brachmanae, _Ahana'_, which, being interpreted, means the Dawn.

'And that the morning light,' saith he, 'offers the best starting-point;

for the later growth of Athene has been proved, I believe, beyond the

reach of doubt or even cavil.' (1)

(1) 'The Lesson of Jupiter.'--_Nineteenth Century_, October, 1885.

Yet this same doctor candidly lets us know that another of his nation,

the witty Benfeius, hath devised another sense and origin of Athene,

taken from the speech of the old Medes. But Muellerus declares to us

that whosoever shall examine the contention of Benfeius 'will be bound,

in common honesty, to confess that it is untenable.' This, Father, is

one for Benfeius, as the saying goes. And as Muellerus holds that these

matters 'admit of almost mathematical precision,' it would seem

that Benfeius is but a _Dummkopf_, as the Alemanni say, in their own

language, when they would be pleasant among themselves.

Now, wouldst thou credit it? despite the mathematical plainness of

the facts, other Alemanni agree neither with Muellerus, nor yet with

Benfeius, and will neither hear that Athene was the Dawn, nor yet that

she is 'the feminine of the Zend _Thra'eta'na athwya'na_.' Lo, you! how

Prellerus goes about to show that her name is drawn not from _Ahana'_

and the old Brachmanae, nor _athwya'na_ and the old Medes, but from 'the

root _aith_*, whence _aither_*, the air, or _ath_*, whence _anthos_*, a

flower.' Yea, and Prellerus will have it that no man knows the verity of

this matter. None the less he is very bold, and will none of the Dawn;

but holds to it that Athene was, from the first, 'the clear pure height

of the Air, which is exceeding pure in Attica.'

Now, Father, as if all this were not enough, comes one Roscherus in,

with a mighty great volume on the Gods, and Furtwaenglerus, among

others, for his ally. And these doctors will neither with Rueckertus and

Hermannus, take Athene for 'wisdom in person;' nor with Welckerus

and Prellerus, for 'the goddess of air;' nor even, with Muellerus and

mathematical certainty, for 'the Morning-Red:' but they say that Athene

is the 'black thunder-cloud, and the lightning that leapeth therefrom'!

I make no doubt that other Alemanni are of other minds: _quot Alemanni

tot sententiae_.

Yea, as thou saidst of the learned heathen, _Oude gar allelois symphona_

_physiologousis_. Yet these disputes of theirs they call 'Science'!

But if any man says to the learned: 'Best of men, you are erudite,

and laborious and witty; but, till you are more of the same mind, your

opinions cannot be styled knowledge. Nay, they are at present of no

avail whereon to found any doctrine concerning the Gods'--that man is

railed at for his 'mean' and 'weak' arguments.

* Transliterated from Greek.

Was it thus, Father, that the heathen railed against thee? But I

must still believe, with thee, that these evil tales of the Gods were

invented 'when man's life was yet brutish and wandering' (as is the life

of many tribes that even now tell like tales), and were maintained in

honour of the later Greeks 'because none dared alter the ancient beliefs

of his ancestors.' Farewell, Father; and all good be with thee, wishes

thy well-wisher and thy disciple.

Letters to Dead Authors(#3319) · 第 22 / 28 题