The addresses of this "Infallible Interpreter" of the cult d

Produced by David Edwards, Matthew Wheaton and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This

file was produced from images generously made available

by The Internet Archive)

Bahaism and Its Claims

_By_

SAMUEL G. WILSON, M.A., D.D.

_Bahaism and Its Claims._

A Study of the Religions Promulgated by Baha Ullah and Abdul

Baha. 8vo, cloth, net $1.50.

Bahaism is a revolt from the fold of Islam which in recent years

has been bidding vigorously for the support of Occidental minds.

Many of its principles are culled from the Christian religion

which it insidiously seeks to supplant. What this Oriental cult

is, what it stands for, and what it aims at, is told in a volume

which forms a notable addition to the History of Comparative

Religions.

_Persian Life and Customs._

With Incidents of Residence and Travel in the Land of the Lion

and the Sun. With a map and other illustrations, and an index.

8vo, cloth, net, $1.25.

"Not only a valuable contribution to the missionary literature

of modern times, but is, in addition, a volume rich in the facts

it contains in regard to that historic country. The American

people generally should read this book, and thereby acquire much

needed information about the Persians."--_Religious Telescope._

Bahaism and Its Claims

_A Study of the Religion Promulgated by Baha Ullah and Abdul Baha_

By

SAMUEL GRAHAM WILSON, D. D.

_Thirty-two Years Resident in Persia

Author of "Persian Life and Customs," etc._

NEW YORK CHICAGO TORONTO

Fleming H. Revell Company

LONDON AND EDINBURGH

Copyright, 1915, by

FLEMING H. REVELL COMPANY

New York: 158 Fifth Avenue

Chicago: 125 North Wabash Ave.

Toronto: 25 Richmond Street, W.

London: 21 Paternoster Square

Edinburgh: 100 Princes Street

_To my Wife_

_whose love and appreciation are a constant

inspiration in our far-away home_

Contents

INTRODUCTION 11

I. HISTORICAL SKETCH 17

The East productive of religions--Imamat--Shiahism, its

sects--Sheikhiism--The Bab-Subh i Azal--Baha Ullah--His

policy--His haram--Abdul Baha--Journey to

Occident--Education--Number of Bahais.

II. THE GENERAL CLAIMS OF BAHAISM 29

(I) New religion needed--(II) Bahaism that new religion--To

supersede Christianity--Doctrines--Baha God--His

Revelation--The Akdas--Conditions of discipleship--Position

of Abdul Baha--(III) Claims superiority to former

religions--In founder, books and doctrines--Not

superlative--(IV) To be a universal religion--Defects in

rites, regulations, calendar, civil government--House of

Justice--Alphabet--Universal language.

III. ITS SPECIFIC CLAIMS 61

Unification of Mankind--Divisions in Persia--Of

Bahais--Compulsory uniformity--One Language--Peace

Movement--History of--Abdul Baha on war--Bahaism dogmatic

and boastful.

IV. BAHAISM AND CHRISTIANITY 81

Antagonistic--Makes Christianity one among many--Abrogates

it--Dethrones Christ--Presumes to be Christ's Second

Coming--And the fulfillment of prophecy--Bahai meeting in

Chicago--Method of interpretation--The "Ikan"--Dishonours

and belittles the historic Christ.

V. BAHAISM AND CHRISTIANITY (_Continued_) 109

Immortality and sin--Faith in Baha--Bahai Scriptures--Its

worship--Hierarchy--Substitutes for Baptism and Lord's

Supper--Christ's words

imitated--Rites--Ablution--Fast--Prayer--Pilgrimage--Acca

Shrines--Festivals--Era--Propaganda anti-Christian.

VI. BAHAISM AND THE STATE 131

Babism political Mahdiism--Hostile to

Shah--Insurrections--Bahaism opportunism--Sought

reconciliation--Tolerated--Indifferent to Constitutional

struggle--Aided reactionary Shah--Rewarded by him Its

political scheme--Houses of Justice--Dangerous to liberty.

VII. BAHAISM AND WOMAN 149

Abdul Baha teaches equality of sexes--Baha does

not--Education of girls neglected--Marriage

enjoined--Bigamyallowed--And practiced--Polygamy of

Baha--His family--Loose divorce--Intermarriage of

races--Aims at amelioration of woman--Moslem efforts--Babi

Kurrat ul Ayn--No successor to--Baha's haram--Men only to be

rulers--Women secluded.

VIII. ITS RECORD AS TO MORALS 177

Claim superior conduct--Falsification of religious

history--Suppression of facts--Changing sacred

Writings--Surat ul Maluk--Lawh i Basharat--Forging

quotations--Perversion of political history--Of Shahs--Of

plot to assassinate--False claim to Martyrs--Double view of

Abdul Hamid--Fact about imprisonment of

Baha--_Tagiya_--Dissimulation--Orient Occident

Unity--Pretense regarding Azal's succession--Maskin Kalam.

IX. ITS RECORD AS TO MORALS (_Continued_) 207

Boast of Love--Hatred for Shiahs--For Persecutors--For

Mullahs--Abusive language--Vindictiveness--Addiction to

alcohol and opium--Testimonies.

X. RELIGIOUS ASSASSINATION 219

Strife between Baha and Azal in Bagdad--Baha goes to

Kurdistan--Dissension at Adrianople--Testimony of an

eye-witness--Attempted assassinations--Plots and counter

plots--Bahais assassinate Azalis at Acca--Other

assassinations--In Bagdad, in Persia--Attitude towards

taking of life--Suicide commended--Psychological

attestation--Traditional custom--Assassination practiced in

Islam--Testimonies--Azali hatred.

XI. THE QUARREL OVER THE SUCCESSION 247

Claim to love refuted--Death of Baha--Titles of

sons--Quarrel over will--Abbas assumes Pontiffship--Brothers

protest--Bitter schism--Boycott, anathema--Appeal to Turkish

government--Results in restriction of liberty--Quarrel and

schism in Persia--In America.

XII. BAHAISM IN AMERICA 263

First notices of--Kheiralla--His converts--Writings--An

American Azali--Pilgrims to Acca--Quarrel and schism--Abdul

Karim--Abul Fazl--Methods of

propaganda--Publications--Orient Occident Unity--Abdul Baha

visits America--Press agents--Photographs,

movies--Addresses--Attitude of public--Communion service of

Bahais--Bahai Temple, Mashrak ul Azkar--Memorial

vase--Influence in America--Chicago congregation--Number in

U. S. A. exaggerated--Statistics of other religious

fads--Christian liberalism excessive.

BIBLIOGRAPHY 287

INDEX 291

Introduction

Among movements in the Mohammedan world in modern times Babi-Bahaism is

one of the most interesting. It is a definite revolt from Islam within

its own fold. It has won its way in Persia amid considerable persecution

to a position as a separate religion. It has added another to the

permanent sects of the Near East. There Christian missions, inspired to

long-postponed effort to convert Mohammedanism, have come face to face

with Bahaism as a new and aggressive force. It has laid out a program as

a universal religion, has crossed the seas and aspires to convert

Christendom. Interest in it has been increased by this propaganda in the

West and by the visits to Europe for this purpose of its present head,

Abdul Baha Abbas, in 1911 and 1912.

Besides those who are interested in Bahaism as students of history and

comparative religions, there are several classes who have shown marked

favour to Bahaism.

(1) One class are simply bent on seeking some novelty. They are well

described by the _Egyptian Gazette_, of Alexandria, in speaking of the

reception of Abdul Baha in London: "About the London meetings there was

a certain air of gush and self-advertisement on the part of Baha's

friends, which was quite patent to all who are familiar with that kind

of religion which will listen to anything so long as it is unorthodox,

new, and sensational."[1]

(2) Another class are believers in the truth of all great religions,

and, with a vague pantheistic notion, recognize all great men as

God-inspired. They are willing to put Baha Ullah and Abdul Baha on the

list of true religious leaders. Such is Rev. R.J. Campbell, who, in

receiving Abdul Baha in London, spoke of the "diverse religious faiths

that are all aspects of the one religion," and of the services as "a

wonderful manifestation of the Spirit of God." He said to the

congregation: "We as followers of the Lord Jesus Christ, who is to us

and always will be the Light of the World, give greeting to Abdul Baha."

Mr. Campbell gives opportunity to the Bahai propaganda in the _Christian

Commonwealth_, and has enlisted Abdul Baha as a contributor.

(3) Another class look on Bahaism as an ethical system, and Baha and

Abdul Baha as world teachers. Their relation to Christ has been only

that of a disciple to a teacher of morals. They recognize in Baha a new

schoolmaster. Being Bahais to them consists in admiration of certain

principles on which Abdul Baha is in the habit of dilating. But these

are not Bahaism any more than Romans xii.-xv. are Pauline Christianity.

Paul's gospel is Romans i.-viii. In its moral precepts and social

principles, Bahaism is a borrower from Christ's teaching, and sometimes

from Mohammed. However, Bahaism is a religion, not a system of morals.

(4) Some adherents regard Bahaism as Christianity continued or renewed

by the Second Coming of Christ, whom they recognize in Abdul Baha. Most

American Bahais are of this class, with faith in Baha Ullah as God the

Father.

How can I classify the late Prof. T. K. Cheyne of Oxford? This widely

known critic in his last work (1914), "The Reconciliation of Races and

Religions," bewilders me by his credulity. It is only charitable to

excuse it as the product of his dotage. How otherwise could an Oxford

scholar take pride in adopting the "new name" and titles given to him by

Abdul Baha, sign his preface "Ruhani," Spiritual, and have pleasure in

being called the "divine philosopher," "priest of the Prince of Peace

(Baha)," and being compared to St. Paul as a herald of the Kingdom, and

write himself a "member of the Bahai community." At the same time Doctor

Cheyne wrote himself down as a "member of the Nava Vidhan, Lahore"

(Brahma-Samaj).

At present there are Bahai congregations in sixteen of the United

States, in Canada, Hawaii, South Africa, England, Germany and Russia, as

well as in India and Burmah. The future of its propaganda in Christendom

lacks promise. Yet its measure of success makes it desirable to examine

its claims and the facts regarding them.

Fortunately besides the older Babi books, there is an abundance of Bahai

literature. There are (1) Treatises of Baha Ullah, (2) Tablets

(Letters) and Addresses of Abdul Baha, (3) Persian Narratives, (4)

Evidential books and tracts by its propagators, (5) Narratives of

pilgrimages to Acca. From an independent point of view, little has been

written. Nearly all of the many articles which have appeared in

periodical literature have been from the pens of Bahais, though often

not so ostensibly. Prof. E. G. Browne of Cambridge University, England,

has translated and edited important Babi-Bahai works. His Introductions,

Notes and Appendices to these books are storehouses of erudition and

enable the reader to correct the biased information of the text. They

pertain for the most part to the Babi period. So do the able

contributions of Mr. A. L. M. Nicolas, the Consul of France, with whom,

as my neighbour at Tabriz, I have had the pleasure of valuable

conversations on this subject on which he is such an authority. I have

had as sources of information also a manuscript "Life of Baha Ullah" by

Mohammed Javad Kasvini, the "Kitab-ul-Akdas," Most Holy Book, translated

by Dr. I. G. Kheiralla, in manuscript, and various unpublished letters

and documents. Besides all this, I have been in personal contact with

Bahais in Persia for a generation. My language teachers were Bahais, one

of them a convert to Christianity. I have found their journal, the _Star

of the West_, a prolific source of information. I may claim not to be of

the class referred to by Abdul Baha when he says, "Baha Ullah will be

assailed by those who are not informed of his principles."

After sketching, in brief, the history of Bahaism I will examine its

religious, moral, political and social doctrine and life. In doing this

I shall quote for the most part from the words of the "Revelation" and

its adherents, in order to insure fairness and justice. In the course of

the investigation, the history and character of the founders will be

considered. Finally I shall describe its propaganda in the Occident.

Bahais declare that Babism is abrogated and superseded. In reality it is

dead and I do not treat of it, except as it throws light on the history

or doctrines of Bahaism. To all intents and purposes, the Bab is as much

an obsolete prophet as Mani or Babak.

I am to deal with Bahaism in its latest phases. The term Babi is not

appropriate to the religion of Baha nor to his followers. Of the

"revelation," it may be said as Jacob said of his wages, they "have

changed them ten times." The Bab altered his declarations regarding

himself and his statements of doctrine. Subh-i-Azal made further

changes. Baha's standpoint in the "Ikan," at Bagdad, differs greatly

from that in the "Kitab-ul-Akdas," at Acca. Abbas gave the kaleidoscope

another whirl and added his interpretations and emendations. Besides all

these, it has been given a Western aspect for Christians. The Rev. H. H.

Jessup, D. D., compares it very aptly to the town clock in Beirut, which

has two kinds of dial plates. The face turned towards the Moslem quarter

has the hands set to tell the hour according to Oriental reckoning; the

face towards the Christian quarter, according to the European day. It

is the face towards the Christians that I shall look at specially in the

present investigation. However historical facts are the same and the

main doctrines taught in the West have no essential difference from

those of Persian Bahaism.

Acknowledgment and thanks are hereby tendered to _The Bibliotheca

Sacra_, _The Bible Magazine_, _The East and the West_, _The Church

Missionary Review_, _The Missionary Review of the World_, _The Moslem

World_, _The Union Seminary Review_, and The _Princeton Theological

Review_ for the use of materials which I have previously published in

their pages.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Nov. 16, 1911, quoted in _Star of the West_, Dec. 11, 1911.

I

Historical Sketch

Does it often happen that the earliest records of a religious

movement...pass, within a short time after their completion, into the

hands of strangers who, while interested in their preservation, have

no desire to alter them for better or worse. So far as my knowledge

goes, it has never happened save in the case of the Babi

religion.--_"The New History of the Bab," p. xi, by E. G. Browne._

Persia is, and always has been, a very hotbed of systems from the time

of Manes and Mazdak in the old Sassanian days, down to the present

age, which has brought into being the Babis and the Sheikhis.--_"A

Year Among the Persians," p. 122._

Outside of a certain mixture of Occidental science and philanthropy,

introduced largely for foreign consumption and in order to give an

up-to-date stamp or colouring to the movement, there is scarcely

anything that distinguishes Babism from its predecessors. The

materials are inextricably interwoven with the whole course of Persian

history in all its departments, political, religious, social, and

philosophical. Time has pronounced its verdict again and again in the

most unmistakable manner. So deep a hold have the ideas, which lie at

the foundation of Babism and similar sects, taken of the minds and

hearts of the people, that it may be said that as every American is a

possible president, so every Persian is a possible murshid. For every

sect that makes its appearance on the page of history, there are

hundreds of embryo sects, of whose existence no one knows outside of a

very limited circle.--_P. Z. Easton, quoted in Speer's "Missions and

Modern History," Vol. I, p. 121._

For the Bahais, the Bab became a sort of John the Baptist, sent to

announce to the world the coming of Mirza Husain Ali, Baha Ullah, and

perhaps of Abbas Effendi--a pitiable result of martyrdom. This thesis is

essentially false. Reading of the book (the "Bayan") will convince every

one of this.--_A. L. M. Nicolas, "Beyan Persan," Vol. I, p. 11._

The soil of the East has been fertile of religions. Montanus, Manes,

Mazdak, Babak, Mukanna--familiarized in Lalla Rookh as the Veiled

prophet of Khorasan,--Hasan Sabah chief of the Assassins, Hakim the

cruel God of the Druses, each of these propagated his doctrines, exerted

a wide influence, and left his mark on the people of the Orient.

Saad-i-Doulah the Jew, Argoon Khan the Mongol, Ala-i-Din al Khalig, king

of Delhi, and many others attempted to found new religions. In our own

day the Mahdi of the Sudan, Ahmad Quadiani of India and Sheikh Ali

Nur-i-Din of Tunis entered the lists. In the West, too, in America a

land unbridled by traditions, Mormonism, Dowieism and Christian Science

have flourished. To all these must be added Babism and Bahaism.

As an introduction to a discussion of Bahaism and its claims, I will

sketch briefly and simply its origin and history. Bahaism is derived

from Babism. Babism has its roots in Shiahism, a soil impregnated with

the doctrines of the Imamate and Mahdiism. The atmosphere is filled with

millennial hopes and dreamy mysticism, with Sufi philosophies and

allegorical fancies of its poets. This soil has been fruitful of many

sects. The Shiahism of Persia is called the "Religion of the Twelve"

because its fundamental doctrine is that the twelve Imams, the lineal

descendants of Ali and Fatima, the daughter of Mohammed, were the

rightful Caliphs of Islam, in succession to Mohammed. In the tenth

century (329 A. H. or 940 A. D.) the Twelfth Imam disappeared into a

well, and still lives in Jabulka or Jabulsa whence he is expected to

reappear as the Mahdi or Kaim. After his concealment, four persons in

succession were channels of communication between him and the faithful.

The title given to these was Bab or the Gate.

Among the sects which sprang up among the Shiahs or were related to them

were the Ismielis, Carmathians, Druses, Hurufis, Ali-Allahis or

Nusairiyeh, Assassins, Batinis and many others. A group of these were

called Ghulat, because they rendered excessive honour to the Imams,

believing them to be incarnations of the attributes or essence of God.

Those holding this view anticipated that the Imam Mahdi would be a

divine Manifestation.[2] At the beginning of the nineteenth century, a

sect arose in Persia, called Sheikhis. It received its name from its

founder, Sheikh Ahmad of Ahsa, 1752-1827. He taught that there was

always in the world a "perfect Shiah," who held communication with the

absent Imam and revealed his will. Sheikh Ahmad was that "perfect one."

He was favoured by the Kajar Shahs and had a considerable following. His

successor, Haji Kazim of Resht, near the time of his death, announced to

his disciples at Kerbela that the Manifestation was at hand. One of his

disciples was Mirza Ali Mohammed of Shiraz. When twenty-four years of

age in 1844, he laid claim to be the "promised one." He took the title

of "Bab," the Gate or Door of communication of the knowledge of God. His

followers were called Babis. He soon advanced his station and claimed to

be the Kaim or Mahdi. Still advancing he took the title of _Nukta_ or

Point of Divine Unity and announced his "Revelation" or "Bayan" as the

abrogation of Islam and the Koran. From Shiraz he went to Mecca and

proclaimed his manifestation. On his return he was imprisoned. Many of

the Sheikhis became his zealous followers and by their active propaganda

caused great agitation throughout Persia. The Bab was transferred to the

extreme northwest of Persia and confined in prison at Maku and Chirik.

His sectaries, oppressed and persecuted, rose in arms against Mohammed

Shah, anticipating victory through divine interposition. The Bab was

executed at Tabriz in 1850. The insurrections were put down and many of

the brave captives were treacherously slaughtered. A few Babis, seeking

revenge, attempted to assassinate the new Shah, Nasr-ud-Din. This led to

cruel reprisals. Four score Babis were executed at Teheran. Others fled

into exile, especially to Bagdad. Among these was Mirza Yahya whom the

Bab had appointed his successor. His title was Subh-i-Azal, the Dawn of

the Eternal, or His Holiness the Eternal.

A special point of the Bab's teaching was the announcement of the coming

of "Him whom God should manifest." After his death a number of the Babis

claimed to be the promised incarnation. There was a "chaos of divine

manifestations," including Hazret Zahib, Janab-i-Azim, Nabil and others.

Among these claimants was Mirza Husain Ali, a son of Mirza Abbas,

surnamed Buzurk, and his concubine. The father was steward or "vizier"

of the household of Imam Werdi Mirza, Governor of Teheran. He was half

brother to Mirza Yahya and thirteen years his senior. His title was Baha

Ullah, the splendour or glory of God. For many years Baha acted in

Bagdad (1852-67) as factotum for Azal, and acknowledged him as supreme.

Then he announced that he himself was "He whom God should manifest," and

took active measures to supplant Azal. About this time the Turkish

Government transferred them to Adrianople. Here developed bitter

jealousies, quarrels and foul play. The Sultan intervened and sent

Subh-i-Azal to Famagusta, Cyprus, and Baha Ullah to Acca[3] (Acre),

Syria, August 1868. Both were granted pensions and kept under police

surveillance as parties dangerous to religion and the state. Azal

continued to be the head of the Babis, called henceforth also Azalis.

Baha attracted most of the Babis to himself, and they became known as

Bahais. Baha relegated the Bab to the position of a forerunner, and

declared the "Bayan" and other books of the Bab to be superseded by his

own "Revelations." He changed in a measure the doctrines and laws of

Babism, liberalizing its provisions. He put himself forward as the Lord

of a new dispensation, the founder of a new religion.

During the next quarter of a century Bahaism made little stir in Persia.

Its advancement was by no means as rapid as during the earlier years of

the Bab. The zeal and devotion of the followers sensibly slackened.

_Tagiya_ (dissimulation regarding one's religion) was allowed and

practiced. The fierce warriors turned to professing the doctrines of

expediency, condemning as unwise zealots the fighting Babis of the

previous generation. During these years they escaped bloody persecutions

except in rare instances. They tried to make their peace with the Shah,

constantly emphasizing their loyalty, expurgating their books to

suppress condemnation of the dynasty, and inducing the Sadr-Azam, the

Prime Minister of Nasr-i-Din Shah, to tolerate and befriend them.

In Acca, too, Baha soon acquired considerable freedom, built a palace,

called Bahja, in a delightful garden and freely received the pilgrims.

He sent out many tablets, composed his Books of Revelation and had them

published in Bombay. He died at Acca in May, 1892, in his seventy-fifth

year. His temple tomb is near the Bahja.

Baha's haram consisted of two wives and a concubine. After his death,

the sons of the different wives quarrelled regarding the succession.

Abbas Effendi, the only son of the oldest wife, proclaimed himself the

successor, the Interpreter, the Centre of the Covenant, the Source of

Authority. Mohammed Ali and his brothers strenuously opposed Abbas and

intense animosity was engendered which divided the followers in Acca and

Persia. Abbas drew the greater number with him. He assumed the title of

Abdul Baha (Servant of Baha). He has the ambition to make the faith a

world religion and has inaugurated a propaganda in the West. After the

proclamation of constitutional liberty in Turkey, he resided in Egypt.

Later he made several journeys to Europe and one to North America. His

visit to the Occident brought him into the lime-light. He was given good

opportunity to present his cause.

The addresses of this "Infallible Interpreter" of the cult did not

reveal clearly the real doctrines and aim of the movement. Abdul Baha

confined himself mainly to the utterance of popular platitudes such as

are stock-in-trade for a multitude of social and religious reformers,

and most of which are original and accepted principles and precepts of

Christianity. The real claims of Bahaism are set forth in the Books and

Tablets (Epistles) of Baha Ullah and Abdul Baha, and in a considerable

literature by Persian and American Bahais.

Abdul Baha is an intelligent, well informed man, of fair sagacity. He

was educated at home after the custom of Persia. He says of himself, "I

have studied Arabic profoundly and know the Arabic better than the

Arabians themselves. I have studied the Persian and Turkish in my native

land, besides other languages of the East. But when I visit the West I

need an interpreter."[4] He said to Doctor Jessup, "Yes, I know your

Beirut Press and your books." His references to ancient and modern

philosophers, to historical events and to European writers, quoting from

the same, show some familiarity with literature.[5] He repudiates the

claims of some of his disciples that he has no literary culture, as that

of Abul Fazl[6] or of M. A. Lucas who says:[7] "He has had no access to

books, yet his knowledge is unbounded." On this point Professor Cheyne

remarks:[8] "His public addresses prove that through this and that

channel he has imbibed something of humanistic and even scientific

culture. He must have had some one to guide him in the tracks of modern

inquiry. I venture to hope that his expounding may not, in the future,

extend to philosophic, philological, scientific, and exegetical details.

Abdul Baha may fall into error on secular problems, among which it is

obvious to include Biblical and Koranic exegesis." "I am bound to say

that Baha Ullah has made mistakes and the almost equally venerated

Abdul Baha has made many slips."[9]

A word should be said about the number of Bahais. I have many data on

this point, but can here give only a summary. Regarding their numbers,

the Bahais have indulged in gross exaggeration. "Millions" is the usual

figure used by American Bahais. Thus Phelps[10] speaks of "the millions

of Bahais in Persia." MacNutt, in "Unity through Love," declares that

"His followers number millions from all the religious systems of the

world." Kheiralla[11] says: "Abdul Karim, 1896, assured me that the

believers in Baha were fifty millions. I wrote to Syria to ask. Sayid

Mohammed, secretary of Abbas Effendi, said that the number was

fifty-five million souls." Kheiralla afterwards denounces it as a gross

deceit. As to Persia, they place the proportion at one-third or

one-half. Dreyfus writes,[12] "Probably half the population of Persia is

Bahai." Some judicious non-Bahai writers allow them half a million or

less in Persia on a basis of ten millions of population. American

missionaries, as Jordan at Teheran, Frame at Resht and Shedd at Urumia,

calculate that the number in Persia does not exceed 100,000 to 200,000.

After careful inquiry I agree with this estimate.

As to other races and countries, let us see. Abul Fazl claims[13] that

"Jews, Zoroastrians, and Nusaireyah by thousands" are Bahais. M. Haidar

Ali[14] says: "The majority of Zoroastrians are recognized as Bahais in

all sincerity." On the contrary Professor Browne writes:[15] "I had been

informed that Zoroastrians were accepting Bahaism. However after much

intercourse with the Zoroastrians of Yezd and Kerman for the space of

three and a half months, I came to the conclusion that few, if any, had

adopted the Bahai creed." In India the proportion of Parsee-Bahais is

very small.

As to Jews:--Remey says: "In Hamadan there is a large Israelitish

following of Baha." A census made by a European Jew showed exactly 59

parents and with their children 194 persons out of a population of 6,000

Jews. As to the United States, I give some particulars in the closing

chapter. The census of 1906 reported 1,280 Bahais, which may have

increased to two or three thousand. In the Turkish empire they are few,

for Sunni Moslems are utterly indifferent to Bahaism. The Egyptian

_Gazette_ says of Egypt where Abdul Baha resided for two years, "The new

religion has made little perceptible progress; Islam remained

indifferent, and the Christian community was ignorant of his presence."

Of Syria, Mr. Phelps wrote:[16] "All the Bahais in Acca are Persians. No

other nationalities are among them." The inference is plain that no

native of Acca had become Bahai through forty years of contact with Baha

and his seventy followers. Bahais outside of Persia are probably all

told not more than 15,000 and one-third of these are Persians in Russia.

Abdul Baha gave the impression that many of the Christians of Persia are

converts to Baha. Dr. J. H. Shedd wrote, 1894, "I have heard of no case

of a Christian conversion to Bahaism." Dr. G. W. Holmes wrote, 1903, "I

do not know of a single Christian in Persia, who has been converted to

Bahaism. Some Bahais who made a profession of Christianity turned back

to Baha." Rev. J. W. Hawkes declares that in his observation none of the

members of the Syrian (Nestorian) or Armenian churches in Persia have

become Bahais.[17] I have known of one Armenian family in Resht and two

men in Maraga, one of whom was a notorious ne'er-do-well, who kept up

his opium using as before.

FOOTNOTES:

[2] Prof. E. G. Browne says ("A Literary History of Persia," p. 311),

"The resemblance between these numerous sects, whose history can be

traced through the last eleven centuries and a half, is most remarkable

and extends even to the minute details of terminology." "The doctrines

appear to be endemic in Persia, and in our own days appeared again in

the Babi movement."

[3] At that very time the chief of the Vashratis, who held that Sheikh

Ali Nur-i-Din, of Tunis, was a Manifestation of Mohammed, and his

essence divine, was in exile in Acca. He was in friendly relations with

Baha.

[4] _Star of the West_, April 9, 1913, p. 35.

[5] Phelps' "Life of Abbas Effendi," p. 227.

[6] "Bahai Proofs," pp. 94, 109.

[7] "My Visit to Acca."

[8] "The Reconciliation of Races and Religions," pp. 155, 159.

[9] "The Reconciliation of Races and Religions," p. 181.

[10] "Life of Abbas Effendi," p. 100.

[11] "Three Questions," p. 22.

[12] Page 42.

[13] Page 64.

[14] "Martyrdoms in 1903."

[15] _Jour. Roy. As. Soc._, p. 501, 1889.

[16] Page 109.

[17] R. E. Speer's "Missions and Modern Hist.," pp. 157, 181.

II

The General Claims of Bahaism

The conception on which Bahaism bases its claim is false. Truth does

not grow old, nor is it possible to change the religion with the

growth of the race. A universal religion must present truth in a form

that will reach men in every stage of civilization, for the reason

that in every period of the world since the dawn of history there have

been simultaneously men in every stage of intellectual

development.--_W. A. Shedd in "Miss. Review of the World."_

It (Bahaism) has not enough assurance of personal immortality to

satisfy such Western minds as are repelled by the barren and jejune

ethical systems of agnostics, positivists, and humanitarians who would

give us rules to regulate a life which they have rendered

meaningless.--_Professor Browne in Phelps' "Life of Abbas Effendi," p.

xviii._

The essence of being a Bahai is a boundless devotion to the person of

the Manifestation and a profound belief that he is divine and of a

different order from all other beings.--_Professor Browne, Art. "Bab"

in Ency. of Religion and Ethics._

The claims of Bahaism are many and varied. They cover a wide range. I

will first consider its general claims and of these the most

significant.

I. First of all, Bahais claim that a new religion is needed. All the

great religions, they say, were true in their day; not only Moses,

Christ, and Mohammed, but Zoroaster, Confucius, and Buddha were Divine

Manifestations, and revealed God's truth. But now the old religions are

dead. Abdul Baha[18] says: "The Spirit has passed away from the bodies

of the old religions. While the forms of their doctrines remain, the

Spirit has fled." "The principles of the religion[19] of Christ have

been forgotten. It is then clear and evident that in the passage of time

religions become entirely changed. Therefore they are renewed." "There

is to-day[20] nothing more than traditions to feed upon.... The world of

humanity is in the dark." One chapter in Thornton Chase's "The Bahai

Revelation" is headed "The Bahai Revelation is needed." This he argues,

stating (1) that Christianity is condemned because after 1900 years it

has not been accepted by all people; (2) because it refuses to reject

miracles and the blood atonement and will not confine itself to the

"principles of Jesus," as the Brahma Samaj; (3) because it tends to

separate peoples, holding itself to be the only religion authorized by

God; (4) because people are dwelling in bondage and are no longer

satisfied. Tares are many and Baha Ullah must come and uproot them.[21]

"The old order of things is passing away," says Sprague;[22] "people are

being tossed about with every wind of doctrine." "True religion is

forgotten," says Phelps,[23] "or has become a hollow name; faith has

waned, men are wandering in the dark." This decay, they teach, is

inevitable and in accord with divine arrangement. They deny the belief

of Christians that Christianity is the permanent religion of humanity;

and that of Moslems, that Mohammed was the "seal of the prophets," and

hold that Christianity was succeeded by Islam, Islam by Babism, and

Babism by Bahaism. Abdul Baha says: "Time changes all things.

Transmutation and change are requirements of life. All religions of God

are subject to the same law. They are founded in order to blossom out

and develop and fulfill their mission. They reach their zenith and then

decline and come to an end." "A new cycle must begin, for the world

needs a new luminary."

It is not necessary to refute the fundamental fallacy of this first

claim, for it is patent that Christianity is alive and growing. Its

manifold spiritual activities, its varied and progressive efforts for

righteousness and peace among men, for social and moral reforms, its

zeal for Missions and their marvellous success, show that Christianity

is neither stagnant nor dead. It has a forward triumphant movement. The

Church renews its strength from its divine Head; He, alive forevermore,

is its Light and its Life.

II. Bahaism claims to be the divine Revelation in this new cycle--a new

Dispensation or Covenant. It disclaims being a new religion, affirming

rather that it is a renewal of religion or religion renewed. One writes:

"The Revelation is not a new religion, but the very essence of God's

word as taught by Christ (and Moses and Mohammed), but not perceived by

Christians at large" (nor by Jews nor Mohammedans). Baha Ullah[24] says:

"Of the utterances of the prophets of the past we have taken the

essence, and in the garment of brevity clothed it." Abdul Baha says:

"The same basis, which was laid by Christ and later on forgotten, has

been renewed by Baha Ullah." "All that is true in all religions will

stand; by the new Dispensation, new spirit is infused into these

teachings."[25] Phelps[26] says: "The body of doctrine which Bahaism

teaches is not put forward in any sense or particular as new, but as a

unification and synthesis of all other religions." Of its system of

morals the same is true. It is a restatement in unsystematic form of

common ethics. It reiterates the second table of the Mosaic Law, and the

New Testament principles of brotherly love and unity. Yet in some of his

addresses Abdul Baha names certain principles as new in the Bahai faith,

such as universal peace, the unity of humanity, arbitration, compulsory

education of both sexes, the harmony of science and religion, the evil

of prejudice and fanaticism, need of investigating the truth, etc. Not

one of these is new; not one owes its position in the world of thought

or activity to the Bahai propaganda.

But whether Bahaism claims to be new in its principles or disclaims it,

in fact it is a new religion. The disavowals are, no doubt, made for the

sake of obtaining easier access to the followers of the old religions,

and are only a temporary expediency. In this they are simply following

the example of Mohammed, who proclaimed his message to the people of

Arabia as the religion of Abraham, and as the same as that of the Law

and the Gospels. But it is evident that Bahaism is inconsistent with

Christianity, as indeed with Islam. Bahais' claims, if admitted, would

lead to the superseding of Christianity. This will appear when I state

its doctrines. The present attitude of Bahais in maintaining connection

with Christian Churches and at the same time worshipping Baha and

propagating Bahaism is one of intellectual stultification or of moral

blindness.

In the same way, in Moslem lands, Bahais conform to the externals of

Islam. In the case of the latter the cause of this is often moral

obliquity or fear; with deceived Christian brethren it is probably

ignorance; by the Bahai propagandist it is allowed from astute policy.

It is an intellectual impossibility for one to accept the teachings of

Baha Ullah and to be his disciple and at the same time to be an

intelligent disciple of our Lord Jesus Christ. The one excludes the

other. Bahaism is a distinct religion. It is not even a sect of Islam.

It abrogates and annuls it. Professor Browne says: "As Christianity is a

different religion from Judaism, and as Islam is distinct from

Christianity, so Bahaism is a separate religion, distinct from

Christianity or Islam." It even superseded and abrogated Babism. The Bab

has been relegated to the background, and put into the position of a

John the Baptist. His book, the "Bayan," is long ago neglected to such

an extent that Professor Browne had difficulty in obtaining a copy in

Persia. Remey[27] says: "Babism fulfilled its purpose, and when this was

accomplished in the appearance of Baha Ullah, it, as such, ceased to

exist." Mirza Abul Fazl[28] says: Babism "is not the same religion or

creed as Bahaism."

A statement of the fundamental doctrines of Bahaism will suffice to show

that it is a distinct religion.

(1) The fundamental assertion of Bahaism is that Baha Ullah is the

Manifestation or Incarnation of God the Father. Baha Ullah says of

himself in his letter to the Pope: "O Pope! This is indeed the Father

of whom Isaiah gave you tidings and the Comforter whom Christ promised."

Abdul Baha affirms: "The Father, foretold by Christ, has come amongst

us." "The Father of Christ is come among you."[29] "The manifested God

Himself has come."[30] He is called the "Lord of Hosts," "the Lord God

Almighty," "Creator of whomsoever is in the world," also "the Ruler."

Abdul Baha cabled back to America after his voyage: "Thanks to Baha

Ullah, we arrived safely at Liverpool."[31] Instead of beginning a book,

as the Moslems do, "In the name of God," the Bahais begin, "In the Name

of our Lord El Baha."

The Persian Bahais accept this teaching. One of them in Tabriz declared

to me: "Baha is very God of very God." M. Abdul Karim delivered the

doctrine in this form to the disciples in America[32] and said: "Upon

the Day, when God Almighty, in the form of man known as Baha Ullah

declared Himself and said, 'I am God and there is no God but Me,' the

old heavens and old earth passed away, all things became new." So it

continues to be preached.

Mr. Remey[33] says in the Bahai monthly (the capitals are his): "This

one is THE FATHER Himself, The Manifested GOD _Himself_ BAHAULLAH."

(2) The Revelation of Baha is contained in his Books and Tablets

(Epistles). Some of these are the "Ikan," the "Surat ul-Haykal," the

"Hidden Words," the "Seven Valleys," and the "Kitab-ul-Akdas." Remey[34]

pronounces them "The latest and greatest of God's revelations to the

world." "They contain knowledge which was sealed and closed up by the

prophets of bygone cycles, so that the minds of the wisest of men were

unable to comprehend it." Thornton Chase, exceeding the others in his

extravagant language, declares that "were all the books of former days

lost and forgotten, the whole of true religious teaching could be found

in the 'Bahai Revelation.'"

The "Kitab-ul-Akdas," "The Most Holy Book," is called by M. Abul Fazl

the "greatest" and "most important." It consists of 146 pages of

manuscript, about 10,000 words. It was written at Acca in Persian and

Arabic. It has been translated into Russian, and a synopsis of it is

given by Professor Browne,[35] of Cambridge University, in the _Journal

of the Royal Asiatic Society_, 1892, of which I make use. The

"Kitab-ul-Akdas" warns the learned against criticizing it, and in

imitation of Mohammed challenges them to produce the like of it. It is

similar in its teachings to the "Bayan" of the Bab, though less

fantastic and mystical. Its contents are confused and unsystematic. It

has laws--ceremonial, moral, civil, criminal--mingled with rhapsodies,

exhortations, addresses, and various digressions. After an introduction

and some laws, follow addresses to the Emperor of Germany and to the

Sultan of Turkey, to the cities of Teheran and Kirman, and to the

province of Khorasan. After more laws there is a digression about

revelation; then more laws and a digression about the Bab; again sundry

laws, followed by a denunciation of Subh-i-Azal, and this by various

civil laws, ending with a command to select a universal language.

The book is a medley, and bears internal evidence of the truth of the

tradition that it was written piecemeal in answer to various questions

from believers. The fragments were jumbled together without order. The

learned are reminded by Baha that he never studied the sciences, and

there is too abundant evidence in the book itself to confirm the

statement. It ranks far below Deuteronomy as a system of laws or a

literary composition.

The opening words of the Book of Akdas state the conditions of entrance

into the religion of Baha: (1) "Verily the first thing which God hath

ordained unto His servants is the knowledge of the Dawning-Place of the

Revelation [_i. e._, of Baha]. Whosoever hath attained thereunto hath

attained unto all good; and he who is deprived thereof is indeed of the

people of error--even though he bringeth all good actions." (2) "It

behoveth every one to follow that whereunto he is commanded. These two

things are inseparable." Acceptance of Baha as the Manifestation of God

and following Him in obedience are the two conditions of discipleship.

(3) A third condition has been added since the death of Baha--namely,

adherence to Abdul Baha Abbas as supreme Head, "the centre of the

covenant." This assumption of authority by Abbas caused a bitter and

angry schism at Acca.

Remey[36] says: "He [Baha] has pointed to the one who should be looked

upon as authority by all, and has closed the doors to outside

interpretation. Therefore obedience and submission must be shown

completely to him." Mirza Asad Ullah[37] says: "Whosoever turns away

from Abdul Baha is one of the companions of the left hand [a goat], and

one of the letters of hell-fire." The rejectors of Abdul Baha are termed

Nakazeen--"the violators." They are "cut off," are "no longer of the

Kingdom." They are "spiritual corpses," from them "goes forth a

poisonous infection," "they have a vile odour," says Abdul Baha,[38] the

preacher of brotherly love and unity. In this way they fulfill their

boast of consorting with all men in "harmony and fragrance."

The minority seem to have the best of the argument,[39] but Abbas has

established himself as Supreme Pontiff. His most honoured agents call

him by titles which imply his divinity. American pilgrims worship him as

"Christ, the Master."[40] Sprague[41] declares him to be "the third of

the great Trinity of Revelators." M. Abul Karim[42] writes: "God

appeared in the Bab as the Holy Ghost, in Baha as the Father, in Abbas

as His Son." Mrs. Grundy[43] says: "Within Abdul Baha is the

inexhaustible fountain of knowledge." Remey[44] says: "Through Abdul

Baha and through him only can believers receive the spiritual power and

sustenance necessary for their growth." Among Abbas's titles are the

"Greatest Branch of God," the "Mystery of God."[45]

These are a few of the salient points of the "new revelation."

III. Another claim of Bahaism is that of superiority to former

religions.

(_a_) Its founder is declared to be superior in his personality, in his

divine knowledge, in his power of revealing. In what has already been

quoted, this is evident. The great cycle which began in Adam is said to

have reached its culmination in Baha Ullah. "The Manifestations are

ended by the appearance of this, which is the greatest of all

Manifestations," which "manifests itself only once in 500,000 years."

"He is exalted above all those who are upon earth and in the heaven."

Abdul Baha[46] says: "Consider the time of Jesus. This is greater than

that for as much as it is the calling of the Lord of Hosts." "All the

great prophets were perfect mirrors of God--manifestations of the

'Primal Will' of God--and sinless, but in Baha[47] in some sense the

Divine Essence is manifested." Phelps[48] says: "He is greater than his

predecessors." "Baha," says Kheiralla,[49] "is the Everlasting Father,

who spoke in Abraham, Moses, and Jesus Christ, who were His ministers,

and at these latter days He came Himself in the flesh to judge the quick

and the dead." Abbas said to Mrs. Grundy: "Baha is the consummation of

all degrees. He is the Revelation of all truth and light." "Christ is

the vine, Baha is the husbandman--the Lord of the vineyard." A poem says

of Baha:

By His life-fostering lip live a hundred such as Jesus;

By the Sinai of His aspect sit a thousand such as Moses;

Thou, on the night of ascent, didst entertain the prophet as Thy

guest.

Refrain:--

The Temple of God's glory is none other than Baha;

If one seeks God, let him seek Him in Baha.

Thou art the King of the Realm of the everlasting,

Thou art the Manifestation of the essence of the Lord of Glory,

The Creator of Creation.

Bahaism and Its Claims A Study of the Religion Promulgated by Baha Ullah and Abdul Baha · 第 1 / 17 段