Diocese of Beauvais, Archpresbytery and Parish of Senlis, (Oise.)

SENLIS, Jan. 8, 1915.

Monsieur: You do me the honor to ask for my testimony as to the

actions of the enemy at Senlis at the time of the occupation, on the

2d of September.

I beg to send you my attestation, and express my confusion and regret

at not having been able to do so sooner.

On the 2d of September an engagement took place between the French and

German troops on the plain of Senlis from 10 o'clock till about

half-past 2, and it was ended by the bombardment of our beautiful

cathedral and a part of the city. The enemy entered the city about

half-past 3 and were received at the end of the Faubourg St. Martin by

a fusillade directed against them by delayed soldiers and a company

armed with machine guns, charged with arresting the pursuit of the

French Army, which was bending back toward Paris.

Immediately the superior officer, who was conversing with M. Odent,

the Mayor of Senlis, accused the civilians of having fired on the

German Army, and rendered him responsible for it. Then began the

burning of the whole Rue de la Republique. This untruth was

immediately spread about, and two hours after the affray a General

said at Villers-Saint-Frambourg what another General said next morning

at Nanteuil-le-Haudouin: That Senlis was burned because the civilians

had fired on the German Army. The thirty-seven hostages brought to

Chamant heard the same statement.

To this testimony I will add my own, which will only confirm what is

said above: As soon as the enemy arrived soldiers of the cyclist corps

obliged me to conduct them to the top of the belfry of our cathedral,

from which they pretended that they had been shot at. Their inspection

revealed nothing of what they thought to find, for I alone had the key

and I had confided it to no one. Some moments later I was consigned to

the Hotel du Grand-Cerf as a hostage. The German General Staff had

gone to Chamant. Some hours later I accosted a superior officer and

asked him what I should do, seeing no one of whom I could inquire the

reason for my arrest. "Remain here, where you will at least be in

safety. Poor curate! Poor Senlis! But, then, why did you receive us as

you did? The civilians shot at us, and we were fired at from the tower

of your church. So Senlis is condemned. You see that street in flames?

(and, in fact, the Rue de la Republique was burning everywhere, 114

houses in ruins) well, this night the city itself will be entirely

burned down. We have the order to make of Senlis a French Louvain. At

Louvain the Belgians shot at us from their houses, from their

belfries--Louvain no longer exists. Tomorrow it will be the same with

your place. We admit fighting among soldiers, that is war; but we are

pitiless with civilians. Paris and the whole of France need a terrible

example which shall remind them that warfare by civilians is a crime

that cannot be too severely punished."

My energetic protest against the accusation concerning the cathedral

and my other doubts formulated against the intervention of civilians

(I did not know what was the nature of the engagement in the Faubourg)

seemed to interest the officer, who promised to make a report to the

General and to plead our cause. Thanks to God, the sentence was

repealed; our poor Mayor and ten hostages were shot, but the city was

spared.

Such are the facts, which I thought might be of interest in your

researches. I am at your orders to complete them if you need more.

I beg you, Sir, to accept the expression of my most respectful

sentiments.

(Signed.) DOURLENT.

Curate Archpresbyter of Senlis.

No. 5.

New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915 · 第 280 / 310 题