Russia's Supply of Warriors

In an article headed "Ought the War to Last Long--and Can It Last

Long?" V. Kuzmin-Karavaeff says in the Russian European Messenger for

June:

It is, of course, impossible to say how long the war will

last. But the case is altered if the question be put in

another form: _Ought_ the war to last long, and _can_ it

last long? The ten months which have elapsed make it

entirely possible to answer it, for, in answering it, there

is no need to guess at the thoughts, wishes, and hopes of

the Germans which are bound up with the war.

In the eyes of Russia and her Allies the present war has as

its object the crushing and dispersing of "the nest of

militarism," constructed in the centre of Europe by the hand

of Bismarck and the vainglory of Wilhelm II. That was

clearly defined last autumn by our diplomatic department.

That is precisely the way in which it was and is defined by

all classes of the Russian people, not excluding those who

are represented by Kropotkin and Plekhanoff. The present war

became far more for Germany than a war for the integrity of

her territory, for her colonial interests, or for her

commercial supremacy, from the moment when three--now

four--great powers rose at her arrogant challenge. Germany

is everywhere attacking, but, in reality, she is conducting

a desperate war of defence for the organization of her

existence, which, for the space of forty years, has rested

on a nervous anticipation of war with her neighbors.

Germany's offensive is a strategical manoeuvre. As a

matter of fact, she is fighting like a wild animal

surrounded on all sides. And, of course, she will carry on

the war until the last degree of exhaustion is reached. She

has accumulated within her many forces--technical forces.

Mere technical forces cannot stand their ground in the end.

But no little time must still elapse. And the war _must_

continue for a long time still, if the "nest of militarism"

is to be annihilated.

But, on the other hand, _can_ it continue a long time? We

Russians have a complete right to say, with conviction: Yes.

Ten months of war have plainly demonstrated that we still

possess a land which is still intact, and personal and

economic forces.

To the east of the Dnieper and Moscow the war is hardly felt

at all. This is particularly true of the principal

foundations of our life--the peasant country parts numbering

their hundred millions. The villages have sent to the war

millions of young men, and even fathers of families, heads

of households. Many tears have already been shed in the

country, and there are many orphans, many cripples. But the

peasant countryside has not suffered economically. On the

contrary, after ten months of war and closed liquor-shops,

it has reconstructed itself and smartened itself up to a

noteworthy degree. The fields have been sown. From among the

huge mass only those laboring hands have been withdrawn for

the war which would not have remained at home in any case,

but would have been lured away to earn money elsewhere.

The same thing is observable also in the towns. The masses

in the towns have increased their deposits in the savings

banks tenfold, while consuming more meat than before the

war, and resorting less frequently to the loan banks.

Information made its way out of Germany long ago to the

effect that all the males there, with the exception of

decrepit old men and small children, have been called to the

army. The peculiar "crisis in men" in Berlin has frequently

served as a subject of jest in the humorous press.

In Russia, every railway station swarms with young, healthy,

powerful porters who offer their services; every large

restaurant has a host of waiters; the wharves on the Volga

and, in conclusion, the mere throngs on the streets bear

witness to the fact that nothing resembling the "crisis in

men" exists with us. Numerous as have been the soldiers who

have gone to the war, the supply of men who are capable of

bearing arms is still colossally great with us.

Consequently, we have the material to fill up losses in the

army. And that being the case, we can go on with the war for

a long time to come--for as long a time as may be necessary

to bring it to a proper ending.

[Illustration: TAKE JONESCO

New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915 · 第 243 / 310 题