AMMUNITION IN FRANCE

_M. Millerand, French Minister of War, after the Senate had approved,

on June 29, the bill appropriating $1,200,000,000 for war expenses of

the third quarter of the year, reported as quoted by the Associated

Press:_

From August 1 to April 1 France has increased her military production

sixfold. The curve for munitions has never ceased to mount, nor that

representing the manufacture of our 75s. I can give satisfying

assurances also regarding the heavy artillery and small arms. From the

1st of January to the 15th of May the other essentials of the war have

been equally encouraging. We are determined to pursue our enemies,

whatever arms they may employ.

_Yves Guyot, the economist and late Minister of Public Works in

France, said to_ THE NEW YORK TIMES _correspondent on July 3:_

France can hold her own against Germany. She herself makes all the

shells that play such havoc in the enemy's ranks, and she will keep on

making all she needs.

The munitions problem in France is not so acute as in England. In

France as soon as the war started we began turning out the shells as

fast as our factories could work. So, in a short time, they were going

full blast. We have been able to supply our army with ample ammunition

and to have shells enough to shake up the enemy whenever we put on

spurts.

It is vitally important that England has come to the realization of

the need of equipping her own army with adequate ammunition. Up to now

the English Army has been sadly handicapped, but with the energetic

Lloyd George in command the munitions output in the near future is

certain to bring a sudden change in the status of England in the war.

We in France being in such immediate contact with the horrors of war

had a stern sense of the necessity of fully equipping our army forced

upon us at the very beginning of the conflict. The only thing we have

lacked has been steel, and we have been getting some of that from our

old friend, the United States. France has steel plants, and they do a

tremendous amount of work, but altogether they do not turn out enough

for our ammunition works. So we had to turn elsewhere for some of this

product, and it was America that came to our aid.

We have got the steel with which to make shells. Our workmen are well

organized and the whole spirit prevailing among them is to help France

to win the bloodiest war of her history.

_The London Daily Chronicle in an interview with Albert Thomas, French

Minister of Munitions, quoted him as follows on July 8:_

It is our duty to organize victory. To this we are bending all our

energies. The war may be long; difficulties may reach us of which we

had no prevision at the start; but we shall keep on until the end.

We know how great are the resources of Britain. We know what immense

efforts she has put forth, which have been a surprise not only to us

but to the enemy as well, and we have every reason for believing and

knowing that these immense resources will continue to be used in the

service of the Allies.

Understand me, I do not say that our common task is an easy one, nor

do I say that we are on the eve of a speedy victory; but what I do say

is that be the struggle long or short, we are both ready to double, to

treble, to quadruple, and, if necessary, to increase tenfold the

output of munitions of war.

We have pooled our resources, and I, for one, have no doubt, that

these resources are great enough to stand any strain which we may be

called upon to put upon them; nor have I any fear of an ultimate

triumph. All the great moral forces of the world are on our side. The

Allies are fighting for the freeing of Europe from the domination of

militarism; and that is fighting into which every democrat can throw

himself heart and soul. Defeat in such a cause is unthinkable.

New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915 · 第 215 / 310 题