The sale, within ten years, of 670,733 copies of Gene Stratton-Porter’s

story, _Freckles_, approaches a 100 per cent. sale but with far too

much retardation.

3

How has the 100 per cent. sale for the Harold Bell Wright books been

brought within hailing distance?

Before us lies a circular which must have been mailed to most

booksellers in the United States early in the spring of 1919. It is

headed: “First Publicity Advertisement of Our $100,000 Campaign.”

Below this legend is an advertisement of _The Re-Creation of Brian

Kent_. Below that is a statement that the advertisement will appear,

simultaneously with the book’s publication, in “magazines and national

and religious weeklies having millions upon millions of circulation.

In addition to this our newspaper advertising will cover all of the

larger cities of the United States.” Then follows a list of “magazines,

national and religious weeklies covered by our signed advertising

contracts.”

There are 132 of them. The range is from the _Atlantic Monthly_ and the

_New Republic_ to _Vanity Fair_ and _Town Topics_ in one slant; from

_System_ and _Physical Culture_ to _Zion’s Herald_ and the _Catholic

News_; from _Life_ to _Needlecraft_; from the _Photoplay World_ to the

_Girl’s Companion_; from the _Outlook_ to the _Lookout_--and to and

fro and back and forth in a web covering all America between the two

Portlands.

There are about 140,000,000 persons in the United States and Great

Britain together. Over 100,000,000 of them, we are told, have read a

Harold Bell Wright book or seen a Harold Bell Wright movie.

The secret of the sale of Mr. Wright’s books, so far as the external

factor is concerned, resides in the fact that his stories have been

brought to the attention of thousands upon thousands who, from one

year’s end to the other, never have a new book of fiction thrust upon

their attention by advertising or by sight of the book itself.

4

We speak of the “external factor.” There is an external factor quite

as much as an internal factor in the success of every best seller of

whatever sort. The tendency of everybody who gives any attention to the

subject, but particularly the book publisher, is to study the internal

factor almost to the exclusion of the other. What, you naturally ask

yourself, are the qualities in this book that have made it sell so

remarkably?

The internal factor is important. Its importance, doubtless, cannot be

overrated. But it is not the whole affair. Before we go further let us

lay down some general principles that are not often formulated clearly

enough even in the minds of those to whom they import most.

1. The internal factor--certain qualities of the book

itself--predetermines its possible audience.

2. The external factor--the extent to which it is brought to public

attention, the manner in which it is presented to the public, the

ubiquity of copies for sale--determines its actual audience.

3. The internal factor can make a best seller of a book with almost no

help from the external factor, but cannot give it a 100 per cent. sale.

4. The external factor cannot make a big seller where the internal

factor is not of the right sort; but it can always give a 100 per cent.

sale.

5. The internal factor is only partly in the publisher’s control; the

external factor is entirely controllable by the publisher.

There are two secrets of the best seller. One resides in the book

itself, the other rests in the manner of its exploitation. One is

inherent, the other is circumstantial. One is partly controllable by

the publisher, the other is wholly so. Since a book possessing certain

qualities in a sufficient degree will sell heavily anyway, it is

human nature to hunt ceaselessly for this thing which will triumph

over every sort of handicap and obstacle. But it is a lazy way to do.

It is not good business. It cannot, ultimately, pay. The successful

book publisher of the future is going to be the publisher who works

for a 100 per cent. sale on all his books. When he gets a book with

an internal factor which would make it a best seller anyway, it will

simply mean that he will have to exert himself markedly less to get

a 100 per cent. result. He will have such best sellers and will make

large sums of money with them, but they will be incidents and not

epochal events; for practically all his books will be good sellers.

5

Before we go on to a discussion of the internal factor of the

best seller we want to stress once more, and constructively and

suggestively, the postnatal attention it should receive. The first

year and the second summer are fatal to far too many books as well as

humans. And this is true despite the differences between the two. If

100,000 copies represent the 100 per cent. sale of a given volume you

may declare that it makes no difference whether that sale is attained

in six months or six years. From the business standpoint of a quick

turnover six months is a dozen times better, you may argue; and if

interest on invested money be thought of as compounding, the apparent

difference in favor of the six-months’ sale is still more striking.

This would perhaps be true if the author’s next book could invariably

be ready at the end of the six-months’ period. Other ifs will occur to

those with some knowledge of the publishing business and a moderate

capacity for reflection.

Most books are wrongly advertised and inadequately advertised, and

rather frequently advertised in the wrong places.

Of the current methods of advertising new fiction only one is

unexceptionably good. This is the advertising which arrests the

reader’s attention and baits his interest by a few vivid sentences

outlining the crisis of the story, the dilemma that confronts the

hero or heroine, the problem of whether the hero or heroine acted

rightly; or paints in a few swift strokes some exciting episode of

the action--ending with a question that will stick in the reader’s

mind. Such an advertisement should always have a drawing or other

illustration if possible. It should be displayed in a generous space

and should be placed broadcast but with much discrimination as to where

it is to appear.

A kind of advertisement somewhat allied to this, but not in use at

all despite its assured selling power would consist of the simple

reproduction of a photographed page of the book. The Detroit _News_

has used such reproduced pages so effectively as illustrations that

it seems strange no publisher (so far as we know) has followed suit.

Striking pages, and pages containing not merely objective thrill but

the flavor which makes the fascination of a particular book, can be

found in most novels. The Detroit _News_ selected a page of the highest

effectiveness from so subtle a romance as Joseph Conrad’s _The Arrow of

Gold_. This manner of advertising, telling from its complete restraint,

is applicable to non-fiction. A page of a book of essays by Samuel

Crothers would have to be poorly taken not to disclose, in its several

hundred words, the charm and fun of his observations. Publishers of

encyclopædias have long employed this “page-from-the-book” method of

advertisement with the best results.

The ordinary advertisement of a book, making a few flat assertions

of the book’s extraordinary merit, has become pretty hopelessly

conventionalized. The punch is gone from it, we rather fear forever.

In all conscience, it is psychologically defective in that it tries

to coerce attention and credence instead of trying to attract,

fascinate or arouse the beholder. The advertiser is not different,

essentially, from the public speaker. The public speaker who aims to

compel attention by mere thundering or by extraordinary assertions has

no chance against the speaker who amuses, interests, or agreeably

piques his audience, who stirs his auditors’ curiosity or kindles their

collective imagination.

There is too little personality in the advertising of books, and when

we say personality we mean, in most cases, the author’s personality.

The bald and unconvincing recital of the opinion of the _Westminster

Gazette_, that this is a book every Anglo-American should read, is as

nothing compared with a few dozen words that could have been written

of, or by, no man on earth except H. G. Wells.

The internal factor of H. G. Wells’s novel _The Undying Fire_ is so big

that it constitutes a sort of a least common multiple of the hopes,

doubts and fears of hundreds of thousands of humans. A 100 per cent.

sale of the book, under existing merchandising conditions, would be

400,000 copies, at the very least. It ought to be advertised in every

national and religious weekly of 10,000 circulation or over in the

United States, and in every periodical of that circulation reaching a

rural audience. And it ought to be advertised, essentially, in this

manner:

SHALL MAN CURSE GOD AND DIE?

_No! Job Answered_

NO! H. G. WELLS TELLS STRICKEN EUROPE

_Read His New Short Novel, “The Undying Fire,”

in Which He Holds Out the Hope that Men

May Yet Unite to Organize the World and

Save Mankind from Extinction_

Such an appeal to the hope, the aspiration, the unconquerable idealism

of men everywhere, to the social instinct which has its roots in

thousands of years of human history, cannot fail.

6

Books are wrongly advertised, as we have said, and they are

inadequately advertised, by which we mean in too few places; and

perhaps “insufficiently advertised” had been a more accurate phrase.

It is correct and essential to advertise books in periodicals appealing

wholly or partly to book readers. It is just as essential to recruit

readers.

Book readers can be recruited just as magazine readers are recruited.

The most important way of getting magazine readers is still the

subscription agent. Every community of any size in these United States

should have in it a man or woman of at least high school education and

alert enthusiasm selling books of all the publishers. Where there is

a good bookstore such an agent is unnecessary or may be found in the

owner of the store or an employee thereof. Most communities cannot

support a store given over entirely to bookselling. In them let there

be agents giving their whole time or their spare time and operating

with practically no overhead expense. Where the agents receive salaries

these must be paid jointly by all the publishers whose books they

handle. This should naturally be done through a central bureau or

selling agency. Efficient agencies already exist.

The “book agent” is a classical joke. He is a classical joke because he

peddled one book, and the wrong sort of a book, from door to door. You

must equip him with fifty books, new and alluring, of all publishers;

and arm him with sheets and circulars describing enticingly a hundred

others. He must know individuals and their tastes and must have one or

more of the best book reviewing periodicals in the country. He must

have catalogues and news notes and special offers to put over. If he

gives you all his time he must have assurance of a living, especially

until he has a good start or exhibits his incapacity for pioneering. He

must have an incentive above and beyond any salary that may be paid him.

But the consideration of details in this place is impossible. The

structural outline and much adaptable detail is already in highly

successful use by periodicals of many sorts. In fundamentals it

requires no profounder skill than that of the clever copyist.

7

We charged in the third count of our indictment that books are rather

frequently advertised in the wrong places. We had in mind the principle

that for every book considerable enough to get itself published by a

publisher of standing there is, somewhere, a particular audience; just

as there is a certain body of readers for every news item of enough

moment to get printed in a daily newspaper. A juster way of expressing

the trouble would be this: Books are rather frequently not advertised

in the right places.

The clues to the right places must be sought in the book itself and its

authorship, always; and they are innumerable. As no two books are alike

the best thing to do will be to take a specific example. Harry Lauder’s

_A Minstrel in France_ will serve.

The first and most obvious thing to do is to advertise it in every

vaudeville theatre in America. Wherever the programme includes motion

pictures flash the advertisement on the screen with a fifteen second

movie of Lauder himself. Posters and circulars in the lobby must serve

if there are no screen pictures.

The next and almost equally obvious thing is to have Lauder make a

phonograph record of some particularly effective passage in the book,

marketing the record in the usual way, at a popular price. Newspaper

and magazine advertising must be used heavily and must be distributed

on the basis of circulation almost entirely.

8

The external factor in the success of the best seller is so undeveloped

and so rich in possibilities that one takes leave of it with regret;

but we must go on to some consideration of the internal factor that

makes for big sales--the quality or qualities in the book itself.

Without going into a long and elaborate investigation of best-seller

books, sifting and reasoning until we reach rock bottom, we had better

put down a few dogmas. These, then, are the essentials of best-selling

fiction so far as our observation and intellect has carried us:

1. A good story; which means, as a rule, plenty of surface action

but always means a crisis in the affairs of one or two most-likable

characters, a crisis that is _satisfactorily_ solved.

Mark the italicized word. Not a “happy ending” in the twisted sense in

which that phrase is used. Always a happy ending in the sense in which

we say, “That was a happy word”--meaning a fit word, the “mot juste”

of the French. Always a fitting ending, not always a “happy ending” in

the sense of a pleasant ending. The ending of _Mr. Britling Sees It

Through_ is not pleasant, but fitting and, to the majority of readers,

uplifting, ennobling, fine.

2. Depths below the surface action for those who care to plumb them.

No piece of fiction can sell largely unless it has a region of

philosophy, moral ideas--whatever you will to call it--for those who

crave and must have that mental immersion. The reader must not be led

beyond his depth but he must be able to go into deep water and swim as

far as his strength will carry him if he so desires.

3. The ethical, social and moral implications of the surface action

must, in the end, accord with the instinctive desires of mankind. This

is nothing like as fearful as it sounds, thus abstractly stated. The

instinctive desires of men are pretty well known. Any psychologist can

tell you what they are. They are few, primitive and simple. They have

nothing to do with man’s reason except that man, from birth to death,

employs his reason in achieving the satisfaction of these instincts.

The two oldest and most firmly implanted are the instinct for

self-preservation and the instinct to perpetuate the race. The social

instinct, much younger than either, is yet thousands upon thousands of

years old and quite as ineradicable.

Because it violates the self-preservative instinct no story of suicide

can have a wide human audience unless, in the words of Dick at the

close of Masefield’s _Lost Endeavour_, we are filled with the feeling

that “life goes on.” The act of destruction must be, however blindly,

an act of immolation on the altar of the race. Such is the feeling we

get in reading Jack London’s largely autobiographical _Martin Eden_;

and, in a much more striking instance, the terrible act that closed

the life of the heroine in Tolstoy’s _Anna Karenina_ falls well before

the end of the book. In _Anna Karenina_, as in _War and Peace_, the

Russian novelist conveys to every reader an invincible conviction of

the unbreakable continuity of the life of the race. The last words of

_Anna Karenina_ are not those which describe Anna’s death under the car

wheels but the infinitely hopeful words of Levin:

“I shall continue to be vexed with Ivan the coach-man, and get into

useless discussions, and express my thoughts blunderingly. I shall

always be blaming my wife for what annoys me, and repenting at once. I

shall always feel a certain barrier between the Holy of Holies of my

inmost soul, and the souls of others, even my wife’s. I shall continue

to pray without being able to explain to myself why. But my whole life,

every moment of my life, independently of whatever may happen to me,

will be, not meaningless as before, but full of the deep meaning which

I shall have the power to impress upon it.”

9

It is because they appeal so strongly and simply and directly to our

instinctive desires that the stories of Jack London are so popular; it

is their perfect appeal to our social instinct that makes the tales of

O. Henry sell thousands of copies month after month. Not even Dickens

transcended O. Henry in the perfection of this appeal; and O. Henry set

the right value on Dickens as at least one of his stories shows.

Civilization and education refine man’s instinctive desires, modify the

paths they take, but do not weaken them perceptibly from generation to

generation except in a few individual cases. Read the second chapter

of Harold Bell Wright’s _The Shepherd of the Hills_ and observe the

tremendous call to the instinct of race perpetuation, prefaced by a

character’s comment on the careless breeding of man as contrasted

with man’s careful breeding of animals. And if you think the appeal

is crude, be very sure of this: The crudity is in yourself, in the

instinct that you are not accustomed to have set vibrating with such

healthy vigor.

10

All this deals with broadest fundamentals. But they are what the

publisher, judging his manuscript, must fathom. They are deeper down

than the sales manager need go, or the bookseller; deeper than the

critic need ordinarily descend in his examination into the book’s

qualities.

Ordinarily it will be enough for the purpose to analyze a story along

the lines of human instinct as it has been modified by our society

and our surroundings and conventionalized by habit. The publishers

of Eleanor H. Porter’s novel _Oh, Money! Money!_ were not only

wholly correct but quite sufficiently acute in their six reasons for

predicting--on the character of the story alone--a big sale.

The first of these was that the yarn dealt with the getting and

spending of money, “the most interesting subject in the world,”

asserted the publishers--and while society continues to be organized

on its present basis their assertion is, as regards great masses of

mankind, a demonstrable fact.

The second reason was allied to the first; the story would “set every

reader thinking how _he_ would spend the money.” And the third: it

was a Cinderella story, giving the reader “the joy of watching a

girl who has never been fairly treated come out on top in spite of

all odds.” This is a powerful appeal to the modified instinct of

self-preservation. The fourth reason--“the scene is laid in a little

village and the whole book is a gem of country life and shrewd Yankee

philosophy”--answers to the social hunger in the human heart. Fifth:

“A charming love theme with a happy ending.” Sixth: “The story teaches

an unobtrusive lesson ... that happiness must come from within, and

that money cannot buy it.” To go behind such reasons is, for most

minds, not to clarify but to confuse. Folks feel these things and care

nothing about the source of the river of feeling.

11

With the non-fictional book the internal factor making for large sales

is as diverse as the kinds of non-fictional volumes. A textbook on a

hitherto untreated subject of sudden interest to many thousands of

readers has every prospect of a large sale; but this is not the kind

of internal factor that a publisher is likely to err in judging! Any

alert business man acquiring correct information will profit by such an

opportunity.

But there is a book called _In Tune with the Infinite_, the work of

a man named Ralph Waldo Trine, which has sold, at this writing, some

530,000 copies, having been translated into eighteen languages. A man

has been discovered sitting on the banks of the Yukon reading it; it

has been observed in shops and little railway stations in Burmah and

Ceylon. This is what is called, not at all badly, an “inspirational

book.” Don’t you think a publisher might well have erred in judging

that manuscript?

Mr. Trine’s booklet, _The Greatest Thing Ever Known_, has sold 160,000

copies; his book _What All the World’s A-Seeking_, is in its 138,000th.

It will not do to overlook the attractiveness of these titles. What,

most people will want to know, is “the greatest thing ever known”? And

it is human to suppose that what you are seeking is what all the world

is after, and to want to read a book that holds out an implied promise

to help you get it.

The tremendous internal factor of these books of Mr. Trine’s is that

they articulate simple (but often beautiful) ideas that lie in the

minds of hundreds of thousands of men and women, ideas unformulated and

by the hundred thousand unutterable. For any man who can say the thing

that is everywhere felt, the audience is limitless.

In autobiography a truly big sale is not possible unless the narrative

has the fundamental qualities we have designated as necessary in the

fictional best seller. All the popular autobiographies are stories

that appeal powerfully to our instinctive desires and this is the

fact with such diverse revelations as those of Benjamin Franklin and

Benvenuto Cellini, Jean Jacques Rousseau and Henry Adams. The sum of

the instinctive desires is always overwhelmingly in favor of normal

human existences. For this reason the predetermined audience of Mr.

Tarkington’s _Conquest of Canaan_ is many times greater than that of

Mr. Dreiser’s _Sister Carrie_. A moment’s reflection will show that

this is inevitable, since these instinctive desires of ours are so many

resistless forces exerted simultaneously on us and combining, in a

period of years, to make a single resultant force impelling us to lead

normal, sane, “healthy” and wholesome lives. On such lives, lived by

the vast majority of men and women everywhere, the security of every

form of human society depends; indeed, the continued existence of man

on the face of the earth is dependent upon them.

You may say that Rousseau, Cellini, Marie Bashkirtseff, even Franklin

and Henry Adams, led existences far from normal. The answer is that

we accept the stories of their lives in fact where we (or most of us)

would never accept them in fiction. We know that these lives were

lived; and the very circumstance that they were abnormal lives makes

us more eager to know about and understand them. What most of us care

for most is such a recital as Hamlin Garland’s _A Son of the Middle

Border_. The secret of the influence of the life of Abraham Lincoln

upon the American mind and the secret of the appeal made by Theodore

Roosevelt, the man, to his countrymen in general during his lifetime

is actually one and the same--the triumph of normal lives, lived

normally, lived up to the hilt, and overshadowing almost everything

else contemporary with them. Such men vindicate common lives, however

humbly lived. We see, as in an apocalyptic vision, what any one of us

may become; and in so far as any one of us has become so great we all

of us share in his greatness.

12

Why Authors Go Wrong, and Other Explanations · 第 7 / 10 段