CHAPTER VI

Faith's Greatest Obstacle

DAILY READINGS

The speculative doubts leave many minds untouched, but one universal

human experience sooner or later faces every serious life with

questions about God's goodness. We all meet trouble, in ourselves or

others, and oftentimes the wonder why in God's world such calamities

should fall, such wretchedness should continually exist, plunges faith

into perplexity. Few folk of mature years can fail to understand Edwin

Booth when he wrote to a friend, "Life is a great big spelling book,

and on every page we turn the words grow harder to understand the

meaning of." Now, the basis of any intelligent explanation of faith's

problem must rest in a _right practical attitude toward trouble_.

To the consideration of that we turn in the daily readings.

Sixth Week, First Day

=Beloved, think it not strange concerning the fiery trial among you,

which cometh upon you to prove you, as though a strange thing

happened unto you: but insomuch as ye are partakers of Christ's

sufferings, rejoice; that at the revelation of his glory also ye may

rejoice with exceeding joy. If ye are reproached for the name of

Christ, blessed are ye; because the Spirit of glory and the Spirit of

God resteth upon you. For let none of you suffer as a murderer, or a

thief, or an evil-doer, or as a meddler in other men's matters: but

if a man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him

glorify God in this name.... Wherefore let them also that suffer

according to the will of God commit their souls in well-doing unto a

faithful Creator.--I Pet. 4:12-16, 19.=

Such an attitude toward trouble as Peter here recommends is the most

wholesome and hopeful possible to man. And it is reasonable too, if

only on the ground that trouble _develops in men the essential

qualities of strong character_. Our highest admiration is always

reserved for men who master difficult crises. If the story of Joseph,

begun beside Bedouin camp fires centuries ago, can easily be

naturalized beside modern radiators; if Robinson Crusoe, translated

into every tongue is understood by all, the reason lies in the depth

of man's heart, where to make the most out of untoward situations is a

daily problem. Not every one can grasp the argument or perceive the

beauty of "Paradise Lost" and "Paradise Regained," but one thing about

them every man appreciates--the blind Milton, sitting down to write

them:

"I argue not

Against Heaven's hand or will, nor bate a jot

Of heart or hope; but still bear up and steer

Right onward."

The full understanding of Ole Bull's playing on the violin was

necessarily restricted to the musical, but no restriction bounds the

admiration of men, learned or simple, when in a Munich concert, his A

string snaps and he finishes the composition on three strings. That is

the human problem in epitome. Getting music out of life's remainders

after the break has come; winning the battle with what is left from a

defeat; going blind, like Milton, and writing sublimest poetry, or

deaf, like Beethoven, and composing superb sonatas; being reared in an

almshouse and buried from Westminster Abbey, like Henry M. Stanley;

or, like Kernahan, born without arms or legs and yet sitting at last

in the British Parliament--all such hardihood and undiscourageable

pluck reach back in a man's bosom beyond the strings that ease and

luxury can touch, and strike there an iron, reverberating chord.

Nothing in human life is so impressive as pluck, "fighting with the

scabbard after the sword is gone." And no one who deeply considers

life can fail to see that our best character comes when, as Peter

says, we "suffer as a Christian."

_O Lord our God, let our devout approach to Thee be that of the

heart, not of the lips. Let it be in obedience to Thy spiritual law,

not to any outward ritual. Thou desirest not temples nor offerings,

but the sacrifice of a lowly and grateful heart Thou will not

despise. Merciful Father, to all Thy dispensations we would submit

ourselves, not grudgingly, not merely of necessity, but because we

believe in Thy wisdom, Thy universal rule, and Thy goodness. In

bereavement and in sorrow, in death as in life, in joys and in

happiness, we would see Thy Hand. Teach us to see it; increase our

faith where we cannot see; teach us also to love justice, and to do

mercy, and to walk humbly with Thee our God. Make us at peace with

all mankind, gentle to those who offend us, faithful in all duties,

and sincere in sorrow when we fail in duty. Make us loving to one

another, patient in distress, and ever thankful to Thy Divine power,

which keeps, and guides, and blesses us every day. Lord, accept our

humble prayer, accomplish in us Thy holy will. Let Thy peace reign in

our hearts, and enable us to walk with Thee in love; through Jesus

Christ our Lord. Amen._--Francis W. Newman, 1805.

Sixth Week, Second Day

=Even unto this present hour we both hunger, and thirst, and are

naked, and are buffeted, and have no certain dwelling-place; and we

toil, working with our own hands: being reviled, we bless; being

persecuted, we endure; being defamed, we entreat: we are made as the

filth of the world, the offscouring of all things, even until now.--I

Cor. 4:11-13.=

If Paul could be questioned about the experience of trouble which

these verses vividly express, would he not say that there had been

qualities of character in him and resources in his relationship with

God which he never would have known about had it not been for the test

of adversity? Trouble not only develops but also _reveals_ character;

we do not know ourselves until we have been tried out in calamity. The

simplest demand of adversity on every man is that he be "game." Henry

Newbolt is not indulging in rhetoric when he tells of a Soudan battle

where a British square made up of Clifton graduates is hard beset by a

charge of fierce enemies, and, in that crisis, makes the cry of a

Clifton football captain, "Play up, boys, play the game!" rally the

men and save the day. At school or in the Soudan the problem is the

same; the sling with which David plays in his youth is his chief

reliance when Goliath comes; a "game" spirit is essential to character

from birth to death. We turn from the story of Nelson at Aboukir,

nailing six flags to his mast so that if even five were shot away no

one would dream that he had surrendered, to find that the spirit there

exemplified is applicable to our most common day. The quality which

made Nelson an Admiral of England, in spite of his lost arm, his lost

eye, his small stature, and his feeble health is one of our elemental

needs. And to a supreme degree this quality was in great Christians

like Paul. Read his letter to the Philippians and see! Adversity

brought his spirit to light, and made it an asset of the cause. In a

real sense, trouble, however forbidding, was one of Paul's best

friends, and there was a good reason why he should "rejoice in

tribulations."

_O Father of spirits! Thou lovest whom Thou chastenest! Correct us in

our weakness as the children of men, that we may love Thee in our

strength as the sons of God. May the same mind be in us which was

also in Jesus Christ, that we may never shrink, when our hour comes,

from drinking of the cup that he drank of. Wake in us a soul to obey

Thee, not with the weariness of servile spirits, but with the

alacrity of the holy angels. Fill us with a contempt of evil

pleasures and unfaithful ease; sustain us in the strictness of a

devout life. Daily may we crucify every selfish affection, and

delight to bear one another's burdens, to uphold each other's faith

and charity, being tender-hearted and forgiving as we hope to be

forgiven. Hold us to the true humility of the soul that has not yet

attained; and may we be modest in our desire, diligent in our trust,

and content with the disposals of Thy Providence. O Lord of life and

death! Thy counsels are secret; Thy wisdom is infinite: we know not

what a day may bring forth. When our hour arrives, and the veil

between the worlds begins to be lifted before us, may we freely trust

ourselves to Thee, and say, "Father, into Thy hands I commend my

spirit." Amen._--James Martineau.

Sixth Week, Third Day

If adversity, rightly used, so develops and reveals character, we may

expect to find trouble as a background to the most admirable men of

the race. We read the luminous histories of Francis Parkman and do not

perceive, behind the printed page, the original manuscript, covered

with a screen of parallel wires, along which the blind author ran his

pencil that he might write legibly. We think of James Watt as a genius

at invention, and perhaps recall that Wordsworth said of him, "I look

upon him, considering both the magnitude and the universality of his

genius, as perhaps the most extraordinary man that this country ever

produced." But Watt himself we forget--sickly of body, starving on

eight shillings a week, and saying, "Of all things in life there is

nothing more foolish than inventing." Kant's philosophy was a turning

point in human thought, but lauding Kant, how few recall his struggle

with a broken body! Said he, speaking of his incurable illness, "I

have become master of its influence in my thoughts and actions by

turning my attention away from this feeling altogether, just as if it

did not at all concern me." Wilberforce, the liberator of British

slaves, we know, and beside his grave in Westminster Abbey we recall

the superb title that he earned, "the attorney general of the

unprotected and of the friendless," but the Wilberforce who for twenty

years was compelled to use opium to keep himself alive, and had the

resolution never to increase the dose--who knows of him? One of the

chief rewards of reading biography is this introduction that it gives

to handicapped men; the knowledge it imparts of the world's great

saints and scripture makers, conquerors and reformers, who, in the

words of Thucydides, "dared beyond their strength, hazarded against

their judgment, and in extremities were of excellent hope." And when

one turns to the supreme Character, could the dark background be

eliminated and still leave Him?

=But now we see not yet all things subjected to him. But we behold

him who hath been made a little lower than the angels, even Jesus,

because of the suffering of death crowned with glory and honor, that

by the grace of God he should taste of death for every man. For it

became him, for whom are all things, and through whom are all things,

in bringing many sons unto glory to make the author of their

salvation perfect through sufferings.--Heb. 2:8-10.=

_O God, who art unsearchable in Thy judgments, and in Thy ways past

finding out, we bow before the mystery of Thy Being, and confess that

we know nothing, and can say nothing worthy of Thee. We cannot

understand Thy dealings with us. We have faith, not sight; when we

cannot see, we may only believe. Sometimes Thou seemest to have no

mercy upon us. Thou dost pierce us through our most tender

affections, quenching the light of our eyes in dreadful darkness.

Death tears from us all that we love, and Thou art seemingly deaf to

all our cries. Our earthly circumstances are reversed and bitter

poverty is appointed us, yet Thou takest no heed, and bringest no

comfort to the sorrow and the barrenness of our life. Still would we

trust in Thee and cling to that deepest of our instincts which tells

us that we come from Thee and return to Thee. Be with us, Father of

Mercies, in love and pity and tenderness unspeakable. Lift our souls

into Thy perfect calm, where all our wills are in harmony with Thine.

Amen._--Samuel McComb.

Sixth Week, Fourth Day

To one perplexed and disheartened by adversity, a theoretical

explanation is generally not half as valuable as concrete instances of

courage and fortitude, founded on faith. Whether we be theologians or

scientists or as ignorant of both as Caliban, there is an immediate,

personal call to arms in the brave fight of George Matheson, one of

Scotland's great preachers for all his blindness, or in Louis

Pasteur's indomitable will, making his discoveries despite the

paralytic stroke that in his forty-sixth year crippled his strength.

The qualities which we admire in them are a sort of apotheosis of the

qualities which we need in ourselves. For we all are handicapped, some

by ill-starred heredity, by unhappy environment, or by the

consequences of our own neglect and sin; some by poverty, some by

broken bodies, or by dissevered family ties--and all of us by

unfortunate dispositions. It does us good then to know that Phillips

Brooks failed as a teacher. His biographer tells us that so did his

first ambition to be an educator cling to him, that in the prime of

life, when he was the prince of preachers, he came from President

Eliot's office, pale and trembling, because he had refused a

professorship at Harvard. So Robertson, of Brighton, whose sermons

began a new epoch in British Christianity, was prevented from being a

soldier only by the feebleness of his body, and Sir Walter Scott, who

wanted to be a poet, turned to novel writing, anonymously and

tentatively trying a new role, because, as he frankly put it, "Because

Byron beat me." He is an excellent cook who knows how to make a good

dinner out of the left-overs, and hardly a more invigorating truth is

taught by history than that most of the finest banquets spread for the

delectation of the race have been prepared by men who made them out of

the leavings of disappointed hopes.

=Therefore let us also, seeing we are compassed about with so great a

cloud of witnesses, lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so

easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set

before us, looking unto Jesus the author and perfecter of our faith,

who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising

shame, and hath sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. For

consider him that hath endured such gainsaying of sinners against

himself, that ye wax not weary, fainting in your souls.--Heb. 12:1-3.=

_Our Father, we thank Thee that while we are sure of Thy protecting

care, Thy causal providence, which foresees all things, we can bear

the sorrows of this world, and do its duties, and endure its manifold

and heavy cross. We thank Thee that when distress comes upon us, and

our mortal schemes vanish into thin air, we know there is something

solid which we can lay hold of, and not be frustrate in our hopes.

Yea, we thank Thee that when death breaks asunder the slender thread

of life whereon our family jewels are strung, and the precious stones

of our affection fall from our arms or neck, we know Thou takest them

and elsewhere givest them a heavenly setting, wherein they shine

before the light of Thy presence as morning stars, brightening and

brightening to more perfect glory, as they are transfigured by Thine

own almighty power._

_We thank Thee for all the truth which the stream of time has brought

to us from many a land and every age. We thank Thee for the noble

examples of human nature which Thou hast raised up, that in times of

darkness there are wise men, in times of doubt there are firm men,

and in every peril there stand up heroes of the soul to teach us

feebler men our duty, and to lead all of Thy children to trust in

Thee. Father, we thank Thee that the seed of righteousness is never

lost, but through many a deluge is carried safe, to make the

wilderness to bloom and blossom with beauty ever fragrant and ever

new, and the desert bear corn for men and sustain the souls of the

feeble when they faint. Amen._--Theodore Parker.

Sixth Week, Fifth Day

One distinguishing mark of the men who have won their victories with

the remnants of their defeat is that they refuse to describe their

unideal conditions in negative terms. If they cannot live in southern

California where they would choose to live, but must abide in New

England instead, they do not describe New England in terms of its

deficiencies--no orange groves, no acres of calla lilies, no palm

trees. There are compensations even in New England, if one will

carefully take account of stock and see what positively is there! Or

if a man would choose to live in Boston and must live in Labrador, the

case of Grenfell suggests that a positive attitude toward his

necessity will discover worth, and material for splendid triumphs even

on that inhospitable coast. The mark of the handicapped men who have

made the race's history glorious has always been their patriotism for

the country where they had to live. They do not stop long to pity

themselves, or to envy another's opportunity, or to blame circumstances

for their defeat, or to dream of what might have been, or to bewail

their disappointed hopes. If the soil of their condition will not grow

one crop, they discover what it will grow. They have insight, as did

Moses, to see holy ground where an ordinary man would have seen only

sand and sagebrush and sheep.

=Now Moses was keeping the flock of Jethro his father-in-law, the

priest of Midian: and he led the flock to the back of the wilderness,

and came to the mountain of God, unto Horeb. And the angel of Jehovah

appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush: and

he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was

not consumed. And Moses said, I will turn aside now, and see this

great sight, why the bush is not burnt. And when Jehovah saw that he

turned aside to see, God called unto him out of the midst of the

bush, and said, Moses, Moses. And he said, Here am I. And he said,

Draw not nigh hither: put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the

place whereon thou standest is holy ground.--Exodus 3:1-5.=

_Father of life, and God of the living, Fountain of our being and

Light of all our day; we thank Thee for that knowledge of Thyself

which lights our life with eternal splendor, for that giving of

Thyself which has made us partakers of Thy divine nature. We bless

Thee for everything around us which ministers Thee to our minds; for

the greatness and glory of nature, for the history of our race, and

the lives of noble men; for the thoughts of Thee expressed in human

words, in the art of painters and musicians, in the work of builders

and craftsmen. We bless Thee for the constant memories of what we are

that rise within ourselves; for the pressure of duty, the hush of

solemn thoughts, for moments of insight when the veil on the face of

all things falls away, for hours of high resolve when life is

quickened within, for seasons of communion when, earth and sense

forgotten, heaven holds our silent spirits raptured and aflame._

_We have learned to praise Thee for the darker days when we had to

walk by faith, for weary hours that strengthened patience and

endeavor, for moments of gloom and times of depression which taught

us to trust, not to changing tides of feeling, but to Thee who

changest not. And now since Christ has won His throne by His cross of

shame, risen from His tomb to reign forever in the hearts of men, we

know that nothing can ever separate us from Thee; that in all

conflicts we may be more than conquerors; that all dark and hostile

things shall be transformed and work for good to those who know the

secret of Thy love._

_Glory be to Thee, O Lord. Amen._--W. E. Orchard.

Sixth Week, Sixth Day

When folk have seen into human life deeply enough so that they

perceive how adversity can be used to high issues, faith in God

becomes not so much a speculative problem as a practical need. They

want to deal with trouble nobly. They see that faith in God gives the

outlook on life which makes the hopeful facing of adverse situations

reasonable and which supplies power to make it possible. The result is

that the _great sufferers have been the great believers_. The idea

that fortunate circumstances make vital faith in God probable is

utterly unsupported by history. Hardly an outstanding champion of

faith who has left an indelible impress on man's spiritual life can

anywhere be found, who has not won his faith and confirmed it in the

face of trouble. What is true of individuals is true of generations.

The days of Israel's triumphant faith did not come in Solomon's reign,

when wealth was plentiful and national ambitions ran high. The great

prophets and the great psalms stand out against the dark background of

the Exile and its consequences.

=Awake, awake, put on strength, O arm of Jehovah; awake, as in the

days of old, the generations of ancient times. Is it not thou that

didst cut Rahab in pieces, that didst pierce the monster? Is it not

thou that driedst up the sea, the waters of the great deep; that

madest the depths of the sea a way for the redeemed to pass over? And

the ransomed of Jehovah shall return, and come with singing unto

Zion; and everlasting joy shall be upon their heads: they shall

obtain gladness and joy; and sorrow and sighing shall flee away.=

=I, even I, am he that comforteth you: who art thou, that thou art

afraid of man that shall die, and of the son of man that shall be

made as grass; and hast forgotten Jehovah thy Maker, that stretched

forth the heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth; and fearest

continually all the day because of the fury of the oppressor, when he

maketh ready to destroy? and where is the fury of the oppressor? The

captive exile shall speedily be loosed; and he shall not die and go

down into the pit, neither shall his bread fail. For I am Jehovah thy

God, who stirreth up the sea, so that the waves thereof roar: Jehovah

of hosts is his name. And I have put my words in thy mouth, and have

covered thee in the shadow of my hand, that I may plant the heavens,

and lay the foundations of the earth, and say unto Zion, Thou art my

people.--Isa. 51:9-16.=

That is a voice out of the Exile. Such great believers, whose faith

shone brightest when the night was darkest, have not pretended to know

the explanation of suffering in God's world. But they have had insight

to see a little and trust for the rest. Stevenson has expressed their

faith: "If I from my spy-hole, looking with purblind eyes upon a least

part of a fraction of the universe, yet perceive in my own destiny

some broken evidences of a plan, and some signals of an overruling

goodness; shall I then be so mad as to complain that all cannot be

deciphered? Shall I not rather wonder, with infinite and grateful

surprise, that in so vast a scheme I seem to have been able to read,

however little, and that little was encouraging to faith?"

_We thank Thee, O God, that Thou dost ride upon the cloud, and govern

the storm. All that to us is dark is light to Thee. The night shineth

as the day. All that which seems to us irregular and ungoverned, is

held in Thine hand, even as the steed by the rein. From age to age

Thou dost control the long procession of events, discerning the end

from the beginning; and all the wild mixture, all the confusion, all

the sorrow and the suffering, is discerned of Thee. As is the palette

to the color, as is violence to development in strength, as is the

crushing of the grape to the wine, so in Thy sight all things are

beneficent that to us are most confusing and seemingly conflicting

and threatening. Sorrow and pain and disaster are woven in the loom

of God; and in the end we, too, shall be permitted to discern the

fair pattern, and understand how that which brought tears here shall

bring righteousness there._

_O, how good it is to trust Thee, and to believe that Thou art wise,

and that Thou art full of compassion, as Thou carriest on Thy great

work of love and benevolence, sympathizing with all that suffer on

the way, and gathering them at last with an exceeding great

salvation! We trust Thee, not because we understand Thee, but because

in many things Thou hast taught us where we should have been afraid

to trust. We have crossed many a gulf and many a roaring stream upon

the bridge of faith, and have exulted to find ourselves safe landed,

and have learned to trust Thee, as a child a parent, as a passenger

the master of a ship, not because we know, but because Thou knowest.

Amen._--Henry Ward Beecher.

Sixth Week, Seventh Day

=Every one therefore that heareth these words of mine, and doeth

them, shall be likened unto a wise man, who built his house upon the

rock: and the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds

blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded

upon the rock. And every one that heareth these words of mine, and

doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, who built his

house upon the sand: and the rain descended, and the floods came, and

the winds blew, and smote upon that house; and it fell: and great was

the fall thereof.--Matt. 7:24-27.=

An important fact is here asserted by the Master, which is commonly

obscured in the commentaries. He says that no matter whether a man's

life be built on sand or on rock, he yet will experience the blasts of

adversity; on both houses alike "the rain descended, and the floods

came, and the winds blew." The Master repeatedly affirmed that trouble

comes without necessary reference to character, that while we may

always argue that sin causes suffering, we never can confidently argue

that suffering comes from sin (Luke 13:4; John 9:1-3). Folks

needlessly and unscripturally harass their souls when they suppose

that some special trouble must have befallen them because of some

special sin. The book of Job was written to disprove that, and as for

the Master, he distinctly says that the man of faith with his house on

a rock faces the same storm that wrecks the faithless man. _The

difference is not in the adversity, but in the adversity's effect._

No more important question faces any soul than this: seeing that

trouble is an unevadable portion of every life, good or bad, what am I

to do with it? Says Oliver Wendell Holmes, "Did you ever happen to see

that most soft-spoken and velvet-handed steam-engine at the Mint? The

smooth piston slides backward and forward as a lady might slip her

delicate finger in and out of a ring. The engine lays one of its

fingers calmly, but firmly, upon a bit of metal; it is a coin now, and

will remember that touch, and tell a new race about it, when the date

upon it is crusted over with twenty centuries. So it is that a great

silent-moving misery puts a new stamp on us in an hour or a moment--as

sharp an impression as if it had taken half a lifetime to engrave it."

The only flaw in that simile is that the coin cannot decide what

impression shall be made. But we can. Rebellion, despair, bitterness,

or triumphant faith--we can say which impression adversity shall leave

upon us.

_O God of our life, whom we dimly apprehend and never can comprehend,

to whom nevertheless we justly ascribe all goodness as well as all

greatness; as a father teaches his children, so teach us, Lord, truer

thoughts of Thee. Teach us to aspire, so far as man may lawfully

aspire, to a knowledge of Thee. Thou art not only a God to be honored

in times of rest and ease, Thou art also the Refuge of the

distressed, the Comforter of the afflicted, the Healer of the

contrite, and the Support of the unstable. As we sympathize with

those who are sore smitten by calamity, wounded by sudden accident,

wrecked in the midst of security, so must we believe that Thy mighty

all-embracing heart sympathizes. Pitier of the orphan, God of the

widow, cause us to share Thy pity and become Thy messengers of

tenderness in our small measure. Be Thou the Stay of all in life and

death. Teach all to know and trust Thee, give us a portion here and

everywhere with Thy saints; through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Amen._--Francis W. Newman, 1805.

COMMENT FOR THE WEEK

I

Few who have sincerely tried to believe in God's goodness and who have

lived long enough to face the harrowing facts of human wretchedness

will doubt what obstacle most hampers faith. The major difficulty

which perplexes many Christians, when they try to reconcile God's love

with their experience, is not belief's irrationality but life's

injustice. According to the Psalmist, "The fool hath said in his

heart, 'There is no God'" (Psalm 14:1). But the fool is not the only

one who has said that. He said it, jeering; he announced it in

derision; he did not want God, and contemptuous denial was a joy. It

was the temper of his negation that made him a fool. But many hearts,

in tones far different from his, have said, "There is no God." Parents

cry it brokenheartedly beside the graves of children; the diseased cry

it, suffering from keener agony than they can bear; fathers cry it

when their battle against poverty has failed and their children plead

in vain for bread; and men who care about their kind say it as they

watch the anguish with which war, drunkenness, lust, disease, and

poverty afflict the race. No man of moral insight will call such folk

fools. The wretchedness and squalor, the misery and sin which rest

upon so much of humankind are a notorious difficulty in the way of

faith.

In dealing with this problem two short cuts are often tried, and by

them some minds endeavor to evade the issue which faith ought to meet.

Some _minimize the suffering_ which creation cost and which man

and animals are now enduring. We must grant that when we read the

experience of animals in terms of man's own life, we always exaggerate

their pain. Animals never suffer as we do; their misery is not

compounded by our mental agonies of regret and fear; and even their

physical wretchedness is as much lower in intensity as their nerves

are less exquisitely tuned. Darwin, who surely did not underestimate

the struggle for existence, said in a letter, "According to my

judgment, happiness decidedly prevails. All sentient beings have been

formed so as to enjoy, as a general rule, happiness." We must grant

also that man's practical attitude toward life gives the lie to

pessimism. Only the suicides are the logical pessimists, and all the

rest of men, most with good heart and multitudes with jubilant

enthusiasm, do actually cling to life. Indeed, all normal men

discover, that, within limits, their very hardships are a condition of

their happiness and do not so much abate their love of life is they

add zest and tang. We must grant further that suffering should be

measured not by quantity, but by intensity. One sensitive man enduring

bereavement, poverty, or disease represents _all_ the suffering

that ever has been or ever can be felt. To speak of limitless

suffering, therefore, is false. There is no more wretchedness anywhere

nor in all the world together, than each one can know in his own

person.

When all this, however, has been granted, the facts of the world's

misery are staggering. Modern science has given terrific sweep and

harrowing detail to Paul's assertion, "The whole creation groaneth and

travaileth in pain together until now" (Rom. 8:22). Let one whose

insight into misery's meanings is quickened by even a little

imagination, try to sum up the agony of drunkards' homes, of bereaved

families, of hospitals, insane asylums, jails, and prisons, of war

with its unmentionable horrors--its blinded, deafened, maddened,

raped--and no small palliatives can solve his problem. Rather he

understands the picture which James Russell Lowell said he saw years

ago in Belgium: an angel holding back the Creator and saying, "If

about to make such a world, stay thine hand."

Another short cut by which some endeavor to simplify the problem and

content their thought is _to lift responsibility for life's

wretchedness from God's shoulders and to put it upon man's_. Were

man's sin no factor in the world, some say, life's miseries would

cease; all the anguish of our earthly lot stands not to God's

responsibility but to man's shame. But the sufferings of God's

creatures did not begin with man's arrival, and the pain of creation

before man sinned is a longer story than earth's misery since. Let

Romanes picture the scene: "Some hundred of millions of years ago,

some millions of millions of animals must be supposed to have become

sentient. Since that time till the present, there must have been

millions and millions of generations of millions and millions of

individuals. And throughout all this period of incalculable duration,

this inconceivable host of sentient organizations have been in a state

of unceasing battle, dread, ravin, pain. Looking to the outcome, we

find that more than one-half of the species which have survived the

ceaseless struggle are parasitic in their habits, lower and insentient

forms of life, feasting on higher and sentient forms, we find teeth

and talons whetted for slaughter, hooks and suckers molded for

torture--everywhere a reign of terror, hunger, sickness, with oozing

blood and quivering limbs, with gasping breath and eyes of innocence

that dimly close in deaths of cruel torture." Is man responsible for

that? For cold that freezes God's living creatures, for lightning that

kills them, for volcanoes that burn them, for typhoons that crush

them--is man responsible? By no such easy evasion may we escape the

problem which faith must meet. "In sober truth," as John Stuart Mill

exclaimed, "nearly all the things which men are hanged or imprisoned

for doing to one another, are Nature's everyday performances." Who can

avoid seeing the patent contrast between the Father of Jesus and the

Creator of such a world? "The power that launches earthquakes and arms

cuttlefish," said one perplexed believer, "has but a meager

relationship to the power that blesses infants and forgives enemies."

II

Could we hold this problem at arm's length, discussing it in

speculative moods when we grow curious about the makeup of the

universe, our case would be more simple. But of all life's problems,

this most certainly--sometimes creeping, sometimes crashing--invades

our private lives. Every man has a date with adversity which he must

keep and which adversity does not forget. One notes the evidence of

this in every normally maturing life. As children we wanted happiness

and were impatient, lacking it. Our cups of pleasure easily brimmed

and overflowed. A Christmas tree or a birthday party--and our hearts

were like sun-parlors on cloudless days with all the windows open to

the light! But the time comes to all when happiness like this is not

our problem; we recognize that it is gone; our Edens are behind us

with flaming angels at the gate. We have had friends and lost them and

something has gone from our hearts that does not return; we have won

successes which we do not estimate as highly in possession as we did

in dreams, and it may be have lost what little we achieved; we have

sinned, and though forgiven, the scars are still upon us; we have been

weathered by the rains and floods and winds. Happiness in the old

fashion we no longer seek. We want peace, the power to possess our

souls in patience and to do our work. We want joy, which is a profound

and spiritually begotten grace as happiness is not. This maturity

which so has faced the tragic aspects of our human life is not less

desirable than childhood; it may be richer, fuller, steadier. We may

think of it as Wordsworth did about the English landscape--that not

for all the sunny skies of Italy would he give up the mists that

spiritualize the English hills. But when trouble comes, life faces a

new set of problems that childhood little knew. We have joined the

human procession that moves out into the inevitable need of comfort

and fortitude.

The decisive crisis in many lives concerns the attitude which this

experience evokes. Some are led by it more deeply into the meanings of

religion. The Bible grows in their apprehension with the enlarging of

their life; new passages become radiant as, in a great landscape,

hills and valleys lately unillumined catch the rays of the rising sun.

At first the human friendliness of Jesus is most real, and the Bible's

stories of adventure for God's cause; then knightly calls to character

and service become luminous; but soon or late another kind of passage

grows meaningful: "Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God, our

Father who loved us and gave us eternal comfort and good hope through

grace, comfort your hearts and establish them" (II Thess. 2:16).

Others, so far from being led by adversity into the deeper meanings

of faith, renounce faith altogether, and fling themselves into open

rebellion against life and any God who may be responsible for its

tragedy. They may not dare to say what James Thomson did, but they

think it--

"Who is most wretched in this dolorous place?

I think myself; yet I would rather be

My miserable self than He, than He

Who formed such creatures to his own disgrace.

The vilest thing must be less vile than Thou

From whom it had its being, God and Lord!

Creator of all woe and sin! abhorred,

Malignant and implacable! I vow

That not for all Thy power furled and unfurled,

For all the temples to Thy glory built,

Would I assume the ignominious guilt

Of having made such men in such a world!"

Many, however, are not by adversity made more sure of God, nor are

they driven into rebellion against him. They are perplexed. It had

been so much easier, in the sheltered and innocent idealism of their

youth, to believe in God than it is now. As children they looked on

life as they might have listened to Mozart's music, ravished with

unqualified delight; but now they know that Mozart died in abject

poverty, that the coffin which his wife could not buy was donated by

charity, that as the hearse went to the grave the driver loudly damned

the dead because no drink money had been given him, and that to this

day no one knows where Mozart's body lies. Maturity has to deal with

so much more tragic facts than youth can ever know. With all the

philosophy that man's wit can supply, the wisest find themselves

saying what Emerson did, two years after his son's death: "I have had

no experience, no progress to put me into better intelligence with my

calamity than when it was new." And in this inevitable wrestling with

adversity, the cry of men is not simply for more courage. They might

easily steady their hearts to endure and overcome, were only one

question's answer clear--is there any _sense_ in life's suffering? The

one unsupportable thought is that all life's pain and hardship is

meaningless and futile, that it has no worthy origin, serves no high

purpose, that in misery we are the sport of forces that have no

consciousness of what they do, no meaning in it and no care. Such folk

want to believe in God, but--can they?

III

Two preliminary facts about Christianity's relationship with our

problem may help to clarify our thought. The doubt sometimes obtrudes

itself on minds perplexed about life's tragedies that the Christian's

faith in a God of love is an idealistic dream. Such faiths as the

Fatherhood of God have come to men, they think, in happy hours when

calamity was absent or forgotten; they are the fruition of man's

fortunate days. And born thus of a view of life from which the

miseries of men had been shut out, this happy, ideal faith comes back

to painful realities with a shock which it cannot sustain. But is

Christian faith thus the child of man's happy days? Rather the very

symbol of Christianity is the Cross. Our faith took its rise in one of

history's most appalling tragedies, and the Gospel of a loving God, so

far from being an ideal dream, conceived apart from life's forbidding

facts, has all these centuries been intertwined with the public

brutality of a crucifixion. Every emphasis of the Christian's faith

has the mark of the Cross upon it. Jesus had said in words that God

was love, but it was at Calvary that the words took fire: "God so

loved the world that he gave his only begotten son" (John 3:16). Jesus

had preached the divine forgiveness, but on Golgotha the message grew

imperative: "God commendeth his own love toward us, in that, while we

were yet sinners, Christ died for us" (Rom. 5:8). Jesus had put into

parables the individual care of the Father for every child, but it was

the Cross that drove the great faith home: Christ tasted "death for

every man" (Heb. 2:9). Nothing in Christian faith has escaped the

formative influence of the Tragedy. The last thing to be said about

the Gospel is that it is a beautiful child-like dream which has not

faced the facts of suffering. In the New Testament are all the

miseries on which those who deny God's love count for support. We are

at home there with suffering men: "they were stoned, they were sawn

asunder, they were tempted, they were slain with the sword: they went

about in sheepskins, in goatskins; being destitute, afflicted,

ill-treated (of whom the world was not worthy), wandering in deserts

and mountains and caves and the holes of the earth" (Heb. 11:37, 38).

The men with whom Christianity began were not strangers to such

trouble, so that some modern need remind their innocent and dreaming

faith that life is filled with mysterious adversity. _Christianity was

suckled on adversity; it was cradled in pain. At the heart of its Book

and its Gospel is a Good Man crowned with thorns, nailed to a cross,

with a spear wound in his side._

Nor have the great affirmations of faith in God's fatherhood ever been

associated with men of ease in fortunate circumstance. The voice that

cried "Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit" spoke in agonizing

pain. And through history one finds those words best spoken with a

cross for a background. Thomas á Becket said them, martyred in his own

cathedral; John Huss said them, going to the stake at Constance;

George Wishart said them, roasted at the foot of the sea-tower of St.

Andrews. Christian faith is not a dream that came in hours when human

trouble had been forgotten; it has furnished from the beginning an

interpretation of human trouble and an attitude in meeting it that has

made men "more than conquerors."

The second preliminary fact is this: _Christianity has never pretended

to supply a theoretical explanation of why suffering had to be_. This

seeming lack has excellent reason, for such an explanation, if it be

complete, is essentially beyond the reach of any finite mind. The most

comprehensive question ever asked, some philosopher has said, was put

by a child. "Why was there ever anything at all?" No finite mind can

answer that. And next in comprehensiveness, and in penetration to the

very pith of creation's meaning, is this query, "Why, if something had

to be, was it made as it is?" One must be God himself fully to answer

that, or to comprehend the answer, could it be written down. To expect

therefore, from Christianity or from any other source a theoretical

explanation that will plumb the depths of the mystery of suffering is

to cry for the essentially impossible. So Carlyle says with typical

vividness: "To the minnow every cranny and pebble, and quality and

accident of its little native creek may have become familiar; but does

the minnow understand the Ocean Tides and periodic Currents, the

Trade-winds, and Monsoons, and Moon's Eclipses; by all which the

condition of its little Creek is regulated, and may, from time to time

(_un_-miraculously enough), be quite overset and reversed? Such a

minnow is Man; his Creek this Planet Earth; his Ocean the immeasurable

All; his Monsoons and periodic Currents the mysterious Course of

Providence through Aeons of Aeons."

So little is this inability of ours to know all that we wish about the

world a cause for regret, that it ought to be an occasion of positive

rejoicing. If _we_ could understand the universe through and

through, how small and meager the universe would have to be! The fact

is that we cannot understand anything through and through. If one is

disheartened because he cannot pierce to the heart of Providence and

know all its secrets, let him try his hand upon a pebble and see how

much better he will fare. What is a pebble? If one define it roughly

as granite he must ask what granite is; if that be defined in terms of

chemical properties, he must ask what they are; if they be defined as

ultimate forms of matter, he must inquire what matter is; and then he

will be told that matter is a "mode of motion," or will be assured by

a more candid scientist, like Professor Tait, that "we do not know and

are probably incapable of discovering what matter _is_." No one

ever solves the innermost problems of a stone, but what can be done

with stones our engineering feats are evidence.

If, therefore, we recognize at the beginning that the question why

suffering had to be is an ultimate problem, essentially insoluble by

finite minds, we need not be dismayed. Two opposing mysteries are in the

world--goodness and evil. If we _deny_ God, then _goodness_ is a

mystery, for no one has ever yet suggested how spiritual life could

rise out of an unspiritual source, how souls could come from dust. If

we _affirm_ God, then _evil_ is a mystery, for why, we ask, should

love create a world with so much pain and sin? Our task is not to

solve insoluble problems; it is to balance these alternatives--no God

and the mystery of man's spiritual life, against God and the mystery

of evil. Such a comparison is not altogether beyond our powers, nor

are weighty considerations lacking to affect our choice.

IV

For one thing, we may well inquire, when we complain of this world's

misery, what sort of world we are seeking in its place. Are we asking

for a perfectly happy world? But happiness, at its deepest and its

best, is not the portion of a cushioned life which never struggled,

overpassed obstacles, bore hardship, or adventured in sacrifice for

costly aims. A heart of joy is never found in luxuriously coddled

lives, but in men and women who achieve and dare, who have tried their

powers against antagonisms, who have met even sickness and bereavement

and have tempered their souls in fire. Joy is begotten not chiefly

from the impression of happy circumstance, but from the expression of

overcoming power. Were we set upon making a happy world, therefore, we

could not leave struggle out nor make adversity impossible. The

unhappiest world conceivable by man would be a world with nothing hard

to do, no conflicts to wage for ends worth while; a world where

courage was not needed and sacrifice was a superfluity. Beside such an

inane lotos-land of tranquil ease this present world with all its

suffering is a paradise. Men in fact find joy where in philosophy we

might not look for it. Said MacMillan, after a terrific twelve-month

with Peary on the Arctic continent: "This has been the greatest year

of my life."

The impossibility of imagining a worth-while world from which

adversity had all been banished is even more evident when one grows

ill-content to think of happiness as the goal of life. That we should

be merely happy is not an adequate end of the creative purpose for us,

or of our purpose for ourselves. In our best hours we acknowledge this

in the way we handle trouble. _However much in doubt a man may be

about the theory of suffering, he knows infallibly how suffering

practically should be met._ To be rebellious, cursing fate and

hating life; to pity oneself, nursing one's hurts in morbid

self-commiseration--the ignobility of such dealing with calamity we

indubitably know. Even where we fall feebly short of the ideal, we

have no question what the ideal is. When in biography or among our

friends we see folk face crushing trouble, not embittered by it, made

cynical, or thrust into despair, but hallowed, sweetened, illumined,

and empowered, we are aware that noble characters do not alone _bear_

trouble; they _use_ it. As men at first faced electricity in dread,

conceiving toward it no attitude beyond building lightning-rods to

ward away its stroke, but now with greater understanding harness it to

do their will, so men, as they grow wise and strong, deal with their

suffering. They make it the minister of character; they set it to

build in them what nothing save adversity can ever build--patience,

courage, sympathy, and power. They even choose it in vicarious

sacrifice for the good of others, and by it save the world from evils

that nothing save some one's suffering could cure. They act as though

_character_, not happiness, were the end of life. And when they are at

their best they do this not with stoic intrepidity, as though

trouble's usefulness were but their fancy, but joyfully, as though a

good purpose in the world included trouble, even though not intending

it. So Robert Louis Stevenson, facing death, writes to a friend about

an old woman whose ventriloquism had frightened the natives of

Vailima, "All the old women in the world might talk with their mouths

shut and not frighten you or me, but there are plenty of other things

that frighten us badly. And if we only knew about them, perhaps we

should find them no more worthy to be feared than an old woman talking

with her mouth shut. And the names of some of these things are Death

and Pain and Sorrow."

Whatever, then, may be our theoretical difficulty about suffering,

this truth is clear: when we are at our best we practically deal with

suffering as though moral quality were the goal of life. We _use_

adversity, as though discipline were its purpose and good its end. It

is worth noting that the only theory which fully fits this noblest

attitude toward trouble is Christianity. Men may think God a devil, as

James Thomson sang, and yet may be practically brave and cheerful, but

their theory does not fit their life. Men may believe in no God and no

purpose in the world, and yet may face adversity with courage and

hope, but their spirit belies their philosophy. When men are at their

best in hardship _they act as though the Christian faith in God were

true, as though moral quality were the purpose of creation_.

If now, we really want a world in which character is the end and

aim--and no other world is worth God's making--we obviously may not

demand the abolition of adversity. If one imagines a life from its

beginning lapped in ease and utterly ignorant what words like

hardship, sorrow, and calamity imply, he must imagine a life lacking

every virtue that makes human nature admirable. Character grows on

struggle; without the overcoming of obstacles great quality in

character is unthinkable. Whoever has handled well any calamitous

event possesses resources, insights, wise attitudes, qualities of

sympathy and power that by no other road could have come to him. For

all our complaints against life's misery, therefore, and for all our

inability to understand it in detail, who would not hesitate,

foreseeing the consequence, to take adversity away from men? He who

banishes hardship banishes hardihood; and out of the same door with

Calamity walk Courage, Fortitude, Triumphant Faith, and Sacrificial

Love. If we abolish the cross in the world, we make impossible the

Christ in man. It becomes more clear the more one ponders it, that

while this is often a hard world in which to be happy, to men of

insight and faith it may be a great world in which to build character.

V

Before too confidently, however, we accept this conclusion, there is

one objection to be heard. So far is the world from being absolved

from cruelty, on the plea of moral purpose, one may say, that _its

injustice is the very crux of its offense_. See how negligent of

justice the process of creation is! Its volcanoes and typhoons slay

good and bad alike, its plagues are utterly indifferent to character;

and in the human world which it embosoms some drunken Caesar sits upon

the throne while Christ hangs on the cross. Who for a single day can

watch the gross inequities of life, where good men so often suffer and

bad men go free, and still think that the world has moral purpose in

it? The Bible itself is burdened with complaint against the seeming

senselessness and injustice of God. Moses cries: "Lord, wherefore hast

thou dealt ill with this people? Neither hast thou delivered thy

people at all" (Exodus 5:22, 23); Elijah laments, "O Jehovah, my God,

hast Thou also brought evil upon the widow, with whom I sojourn, by

slaying her son?" (I Kings 17:20); Habakkuk complains, "Wherefore

lookest thou upon them that deal treacherously, and holdest thy peace,

when the wicked swalloweth up the man that is more righteous than he?"

(Hab. 1:13); and Job protests, "Although thou knowest that I am not

wicked, ... yet thou dost destroy me" (Job 10:7, 8). Man's loss of

faith springs often from this utter disparity between desert and

fortune. The time comes to almost every man when he looks on,

indignant, desperate, at some gross horror uninterrupted, some

innocent victim entreated cruelly. He understands Carlyle's impatient

cry, "God sits in heaven and does nothing!"

Natural as is this attitude, and unjust as many of life's tragic

troubles are, we should at least see this: _man must not demand that

goodness straightway receive its pay and wrong its punishment_. He

may not ask that every virtuous deed be at once rewarded by

proportionate happiness and every sin be immediately punished by

proportionate pain. That, some might suppose, would put justice into

life. But whatever it might put into life, such an arrangement

obviously would take out _character_. The men whose moral quality

we most highly honor were not paid for their goodness on Saturday

night and did not expect to be. They chose their course _for

righteousness' sake alone_, although they knew what crowns of

thorns, what scornful crowds about their cross might end the journey.

They did not drive close bargains with their fate, demanding insurance

against trouble as the price of goodness. They chose the honorable

deed for honor's sake; they chose it the more scrupulously, the more

pleasure was offered for dishonor; their tone in the face of

threatened suffering was like Milne's, Scotland's last martyr: "I will

not recant the truth, for I am corn and no chaff; and I will not be

blown away with the wind nor burst with the flail, but I will abide

both."

Every man is instinctively aware and by his admiration makes it known,

that the kind of character which chooses right, willing to suffer for

it, is man's noblest quality. The words in which such character has

found utterance are man's spiritual battle cries. Esther, going before

the King, saying, "If I perish, I perish" (Esther 4:16); the three

Hebrews, facing the fiery furnace saying, "Our God whom we serve is

able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace; and he will deliver

us out of thy hand, O king. But if _not_, be it known unto thee, O

king, that we will not serve thy gods" (Dan. 3:17, 18); Peter and the

apostles, facing the angry Council, saying, "We must obey God rather

than men" (Acts 5:29); Anaxarchus, the martyr, crying, "Beat on at the

case of Anaxarchus; Anaxarchus himself you cannot touch"; Luther,

defying the Emperor, "Here stand I; I can do no other"--most words of

men are easily dispensable, but no words like these can man afford to

spare. They are his best. _And this sort of goodness has been

possible, because God had not made the world as our complaints

sometimes would have it._ For such character, a system where goodness

costs is absolutely necessary. A world where goodness was paid cash in

pleasant circumstance would have no such character to show. Right and

wrong for their own sakes would be impossible; only prudence and

imprudence for happiness' sake could there exist. Out of the same door

with the seeming injustice of life goes the possibility of man's

noblest quality--his goodness "in scorn of consequence." Many special

calamities no one on earth can hope to understand. But when one has

granted that fitness to grow character is the only worthy test of

creation, it evidently is not so simple as at first it seemed to

improve the fundamental structure of the world.

VI

Indeed, when one in imagination assumes the task of omnipotence and

endeavors to construct a universe that shall be fitted for the growth

of character, he cannot long hesitate concerning certain elements

which must be there. _A system of regular law_ would have to be the

basis of that world, for only in a law-abiding universe could

obedience be taught. If the stars and planets behaved "like swarms of

flies" and nothing could be relied upon to act twice in the same way,

character and intelligence alike would be impossible. In this new

world, remolded, "nearer to our heart's desire," _progress_ also would

be a necessity. A stagnant world cannot grow character. There must be

real work to do, aims to achieve; there must be imperfections to

overpass and wrongs to right. Only in a system where the present

situation is a point of departure and a better situation is a

possibility, where ideal and hope, courage and sacrifice are

indispensable can character grow. In this improved world of our

dreams, _free-will_ in some measure must be granted man. If character

is to be real, man must not in his choice between right and wrong be

as Spinoza pictured him, a stone hurled through the air, which thinks

that it is flying; he must have some control of conduct, some genuine,

though limited, power of choice. And in this universe which we are

planning for character's sake, individuals could not stand separate

and unrelated; _they must be woven into a community_. Love which is

the crown of character, lacking this, would be impossible. What

happens to one must happen to all; good and ill alike must be

contagious in a society where we are "members one of another."

No one of these four elements could be omitted from a world whose test

was its adaptability for character. Men with genuine power of choice,

fused into a fellowship of social life, living in a law-abiding and

progressive world--on no other terms imaginable to man could character

be possible. _Yet these four things contain all the sources of our

misery._ Physical law--what tragic issues its stern, unbending

course brings with terrific incidence on man! Progress--how obviously

it implies conditions imperfect, wrong, through which we have to

struggle toward the best! Free-will--what a nightmare of horror man's

misuse of it has caused since sin began! Social fellowship--how surely

the innocent must suffer with the guilty, how impossible for any man

to bear the consequence of his own sin alone! We may not see why these

general conditions should involve the particular calamities which we

bewail, but even our finite minds can see thus far into the mystery of

suffering: _all our trouble springs from four basic factors in the

universe, without any one of which, great character would be

impossible_.

While, therefore, if one _deny_ God, the mystery of goodness lacks

both sense and solution; one may _affirm_ God and find the mystery of

evil, mysterious still but suffused with light. God is working out a

spiritual purpose here by means without which no spiritual purpose is

conceivable. Fundamentally creation is good. We misuse it, we fail to

understand its meaning and to appropriate its discipline, and

impatient because the eternal purpose is not timed by our small

clocks, we have to confess with Theodore Parker, "The trouble seems to

be that God is not in a hurry and I am." In hours of insight, however,

we perceive how little our complaints will stand the test of

dispassionate thought. Our miseries are not God's inflictions on us as

individuals, so that we may judge his character and his thought of us

by this special favor or by that particular calamity. The most

careless thinker feels the poor philosophy of Lord Londonderry's

petulant entry in his journal: "Here I learned that Almighty God, for

reasons best known to himself, had been pleased to burn down my house

in the county of Durham." One must escape such narrow egoism if he is

to understand the purposes of God; one must rise to look on a

creation, with character at all costs for its aim, and countless æons

for its settling. In the making of this world God has _limited

himself_; he cannot lightly do what he will. He has limited himself in

creating a law-abiding system where his children must learn obedience

without special exemptions; in ordaining a progressive system where

what _is_ is the frontier from which men seek what _ought to be_; in

giving men the power to choose right, with its inevitable corollary,

the power to choose wrong; in weaving men into a communal fellowship

where none can escape the contagious life of all. What Martineau said

of the first of these is true in spirit of them all: "The universality

of law is God's eternal act of self limitation or abstinence from the

movements of free affection, for the sake of a constancy that shall

never falter or deceive."

When once a man has risen to the vision of so splendid a purpose in so

great a world, he rejoices in the outlook. Granted that now he sees in

a mirror darkly, that many a cruel event in human life perplexes

still--he has seen enough to give solid standing to his faith. What if

an insect, someone has suggested, were born just after a thunderstorm

began and died just before it stopped--how dark would be its picture

of creation! But we who span a longer period of time, are not so

obsessed by thunderstorms, although we may not like them. They have

their place and serve their purpose; we see them in a broader

perspective than an insect knows and on sultry days we even crave

their coming. A broken doll is to a child a cruel tragedy, but to the

father watching the child's struggle to accept the accident, to make

the best of it and to come off conqueror, the event is not utterly

undesirable. He is not glad at the child's suffering, but with his

horizons he sees in it factors which she does not see. So God's

horizons infinitely overpass our narrow outlooks. There is something

more than whimsy in the theologian's saying, which President King

reports, that an insect crawling up a column of the Parthenon, with

difficulty and pain negotiating passage about a pore in the stone, is

as well qualified to judge of the architecture of the Parthenon, as we

of the infinitude of God's plans. Seeing as much as we have seen of

sense and purpose in the structure of creation, we have seen all that

our finite minds with small horizons could have hoped. We have gained

ample justification for the attitude toward suffering which Dolly

Winthrop in Silas Marner has immortalized: "Eh, there's trouble i'

this world, and there's things as we can niver make out the rights on.

And all as we've got to do is to trusten, Master Marner--to do the

right thing as far as we know and to trusten. For if us, as knows so

little, can see a bit o' good and rights, we may be sure as there's a

good and a rights bigger nor what we can know--I feel it i' my own

inside as it must be so."

VII

We may not truthfully leave our subject in such a case that faith's

concern with human misery will seem to lie merely in giving adversity

an explanation. Faith is concerned not alone to _explain_ misery

but to _heal_ it. For while it is impossible without hardship to

develop character, there are woeful calamities on earth that do not

help man's moral quality; they crush and mutilate it; they are

barbarous intruders on the plan of God and they have no business in

his world. Some ills are such that no theory can reconcile them with

the love of God and no man ought to desire such reconciliation; in the

love of God they ought to be abolished. Slavery must be a possibility

in a world where man is free; but God's goodness was not chiefly

vindicated by such a theory of explanation. It was chiefly vindicated

by slavery's abolishment. The liquor traffic and war, needless poverty

in a world so rich, avoidable diseases that science can overcome--how

long a list of woes there is that faith should not so much explain as

banish! When some ills like drunkenness and war and economic injustice

are thrust against our faith, and men ask that the goodness of God be

reconciled with these, faith's first answer should be not speculation

but action. Such woes, so far from being capable of reconciliation

with God's goodness, are irreconcilable with a decent world. God does

not want to be reconciled with them; he hates them "with a perfect

hatred." We may not make ourselves patient with them by any theory of

their necessity. They are not necessary; they are perversions of man's

life; and _the best defense of faith is their annihilation_.

Indeed, a man who, rebellious in complaint, has clamorously asked an

explanation of life's ills as the price of faith in God, may well in

shame consider God's real saints. When things were at their worst,

when wrong was conqueror and evils that seemed blatantly to deny the

love of God were in the saddle, these spiritual soldiers went out to

fight. The winds of ill that blow out our flickering faith made their

religion blaze--a pillar of fire in the night. The more evil they

faced, the more religion they produced to answer it. They were the

real believers, who "through faith subdued kingdoms, wrought

righteousness, obtained promises." In comparison with such, it is

obviously paltry business to drive a bargain with God that if all goes

well we will believe in him, but if things look dark, then faith must

go.

Many a man, therefore, who is no philosopher can be a great defender

of the faith. He may not weave arguments to prove that such a world as

this in its fundamental structure is fitted to a moral purpose. But he

can join the battle to banish from the world those ills that have no

business here and that God hates. He can help produce that final

defense of the Christian faith--a world where it is easier to believe

in God.

The Meaning of Faith · 第 6 / 12 章